Showing posts with label Futures contract. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Futures contract. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

The #BitcoinBreakdown: Demigod in the Details

First Appearing on HedgeAccordingly.com


Sixth in a series. Part 1Part 2Part 3, Part 4Part 5


By @sellputs


Seems like everybody wants to buy in on bitcoin, and if you do, brace for a gut-tossing rollercoaster ride and another drawback, as well:  Trading costs in crypto are astonishingly high. 


Comparison: on TD Ameritrade, you can do a $10 million transaction in stocks on the New York Stock Exchange and it will cost you as little as $6.99; sell $10 million in bitcoin, and the transaction fee could come to $100,000 or more. And stocks are safer!


Opening an account with Coinbase (see Part 3 of this series), is more of a beginner’s way, admittedly, to go to the market to “buy” crypto-coins.  It also is the better option for buy-and-hold fans of bitcoin, though holding anything too long in cryptos may be risky on its face.


Coinbase imposes a fee on every transaction you undertake, charging 1.5% of the total value of the purchase or sale. And if you want to use your credit card to set up an account, Coinbase will charge you a 4% fee for the pleasure.  That’s $400 to hand ’em $10,000.


The GDAX trading platform is the more advanced way to play, ideal for day trading and high-frequency trading if you have the nerve.  It assesses no transaction fees at all as you trade, and it allows more sophisticated techniques that Coinbase doesn’t enable, such as limit orders letting you set stop-losses (sell when the price falls to a particular level) and buy limits letting you trigger a “buy” only when a coin hits the price you specified.


The platform exacts an ample vig, however, once you take cash out of your GDAX account, whether it’s an exponential windfall or the remaining shreds of cash from a bitcoin beating. GDX charges a fee of 25 to 100 basis points, or 0.25% to 1.0% of the total sum you withdraw. In some cases the fees run even higher than that.


Plus, on Coinbase and GDAX the only way to bet on bitcoin et al is to bet their prices will rise—so far, you cannot hedge that gamble by actively betting that bitcoin will actually go down in price, by selling short.  At least, you can’t do that on Coinbase and GDX and their rivals. Now, though, you can short elsewhere, via futures contracts on both CBOE and the CME


One futures contract on the CBOE involves one full bitcoin, while at the CME, one contract covers five bitcoins. Thus, the CME contract has higher leverage than the CBOE contract. The CME contract is based on the average price taken from five exchanges, while the CBOE’s contract is priced off of a single exchange, run by Gemini Trust Co. 


Those differences create gaps and fleeting, short-lived anomalies, and professional traders and their Ph.D. mathematicians will be brainstorming this one, figuring out new algorithms aimed at exploiting those spreads between the two markets.  It is unclear how much bitcoin prices could gyrate around as a result of such computerized trading.


As you read this—most of you didn’t get down this far, and for those of you who did—I’d bet you some holders of real bitcoins are slowly converting a portion of them into dollars and investing the cash in new bitcoin futures on CBOE and the CME.  In some ways that may be the ultimate sign of how bitcoin gradually will get co-opted by Wall Street and superseded by trading in derivatives-of-derivatives based on bitcoin prices.


Hold on to your hats for this ride.


Next: A new way to predict bitcoin’s pricing patterns.









Thursday, December 21, 2017

Bitcoin Trust Plunges As Arbitrage Spreads Collapse

Just a week after CME started Bitcoin futures trading (and 2 weeks after CBOE), a number of massive arbitrage premiums have finally started to collapse as shorts dip their toes in a risk-limited way...


The first "arbitrage" is the Bitcoin Futures-Spot spread which was well over $2000 in the first few days of Bitcoin Futures trading. As volumes have picked up in recent days, the premium has compressed to zero today...



This is the worst 3-day run for Bitcoin in over a month.


And perhaps an even more profitable arbitrage has been the compression of the spread between Bitcoin futures and the Bitcoin price implied by GBTC (The Bitcoin Investment Trust) which traded at a truly stunning premium to NAV, has collapsed in the last 3 days from over $35,000 to below $20,000...



This was the trade that Citron"s Andrew Left suggested...


“There’s an incredibly naïve investor base behind this who doesn’t want to check the extra boxes off to open a futures account,” he said.


 


The gap between the trust’s price and holdings “has to do with investors out there that do not know what they’re doing.”


 


Left also said that the current challenge for investors interested in shorting the trust is finding shares to borrow.



Still some room to go but the trend is coming back...



As liquidity picks up in Bitcoin futures, so these arbs should evaporate further.


We also note considerably higher volume today going through both futures contracts as more brokers begin trading and "shorts" are enabled...



 


Cryptos are largely under pressure today...



 


With the recently heralded Bitcoin Cash crashing 45% and fading drastically against Bitcoin...



 









Monday, December 18, 2017

Nasdaq Tops 7,000 For First Time Ever As VIX Crashes

Having passed 6,000 for the first time in April, Nasdaq has now soared 17% since then to surpass 7,000 today...


 


As soon as cash markets closed last Friday (quad witch), US equity futures spiked... then spiked again on Sunday night"s open, and again at the US equity cash open this morning...



 


And VIX has been crushed this morning...










Thursday, December 14, 2017

China Regulators Complete Final "Drill" In Preparation For Petro-Yuan Futures Trading

Amid all the chatter of Venezuela and Russia potentially creating oil-backed cryptocurrencies, the "huge news" of China"s launch of the Petro-Yuan has fallen off the front page... until now.


This week saw the Shanghai Futures Exchange complete its fifth yuan-back oil futures contract trading drill successfully...


As Bloomberg reports, 149 members of Shanghai International Energy Exchange traded 647,930 lots in the drill with total value of 268.2b yuan, according to a statement from the exchange, which added that the system basically met the listing requirements of crude futures after the drill.



While this was a success, it"s not all plain-saling...


As Bloomberg notes, as the world’s largest energy consumer and an increasing source of investment capital for oil-producing nations, China has an interest in using its own currency rather than that of a geopolitical competitor.


One hurdle for setting up a rival to Brent or West Texas Intermediate: Overseas oil producers and traders would need to swallow China’s capital controls and penchant for occasional market interventions.


Similar hurdles have kept foreign investors as bit players in China’s giant mainland stock and bond markets, and the share of payments in Yuan in the Global SWIFT system has fallen...



"This contract has the potential to greatly help China’s push for yuan internationalization," said Yao Wei, chief China economist at Societe Generale SA in Paris.


 


"But its success will hinge critically on the degree of freedom allowed for the capital flows related to the contract," she said.


 


"It is not unreasonable to envision a world in which the overwhelming share of commodity contracts, especially for oil, are no longer denominated just in dollars," said Eswar Prasad, a former China division chief at the IMF.


 


But "the yuan’s role in global finance will ultimately be determined by the degree of commitment of Xi Jinping’s government to economic and financial market reforms."



But, as we detailed previously, the writing is on the wall for dollar hegemony, and we suspect teh decline in global yuan trade volumes is another reason for China to push ahead sooner.



As Russian President Vladimir Putin said almost two months ago during the BRICs summit in Xiamen,


“Russia shares the BRICS countries’ concerns over the unfairness of the global financial and economic architecture, which does not give due regard to the growing weight of the emerging economies. We are ready to work together with our partners to promote international financial regulation reforms and to overcome the excessive domination of the limited number of reserve currencies.”



As Pepe Escobar recently noted, "to overcome the excessive domination of the limited number of reserve currencies" is the politest way of stating what the BRICS have been discussing for years now; how to bypass the US dollar, as well as the petrodollar.


Beijing is ready to step up the game. Soon China will launch a crude oil futures contract priced in yuan. This means that Russia – as well as Iran, the other key node of Eurasia integration – may bypass US sanctions by trading energy in their own currencies, or in yuan. Inbuilt in the move is a true Chinese win-win; the yuan - according to some - will be fully convertible into gold on both the Shanghai and Hong Kong exchanges.


The new triad of oil, yuan and gold is actually a win-win-win. No problem at all if energy providers prefer to be paid in physical gold instead of yuan. The key message is the US dollar being bypassed.


China"s plans for oil futures trading go back more than two decades, with the government introducing a domestic crude contract in 1993 and stopping a year later amid an overhaul of its energy industry. But in 2013, we first hinted at the birth of the petroyuan was looming...


In doing so China is effectively lobbing the first shot across the bow of the Petrodollar system, and more importantly, the key support of the USD in the international arena... setting the scene for the petroyuan.



*  *  *


And now it just became one step closer to reality, as Bloomberg reports, China’s government State Council has officially approved the listing of a crude futures contract in Shanghai, according to people familiar with the matter.


While the date of launch will be determined by China Securities Regulatory Commission and Shanghai Futures Exchange, it would appear we are within weeks of it becoming a reality as China prepares to roll out a yuan-denominated oil contract...


"Approval of the trading rules by the securities regulator marks the clearance of a major hurdle toward launch of the contract," Li Zhoulei, an analyst with Everbright Futures, said by phone.


 


"The latest rules raised entry threshold for investors from the draft rules, which shows the government wants to avoid volatility when it first starts trading."



Which, according to Adam Levinson, of hedge fund manager Graticule Asset Management Asia, will be a “wake up call” for investors who haven’t paid attention to the plans.









Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Bitcoin (BTCUSD) Testing Daily Chart Upchannel Resistance

Bitcoin (BTCUSD) Weekly/Daily


Bitcoin (BTCUSD) was rejected yesterday at upchannel resistance (on the weekly and daily chart), and may see a few days of profittaking as hinted by the daily MACD histogram sliding down.  A stronger selloff could quickly coincide with the daily MACD negatively crossing.  Nevertheless, longer term bulls will take comfort in the weekly MACD still sloping strongly up.  I suspect that after the next few days of consolidation, BTCUSD bulls may try once again to reach the psychologically key 20,000 whole figure level (which BTCUSD nearly did with a rise to over 19500 last Thursday on GDAX) ahead of the highly anticipated CME Bitcoin futures launch Monday (Sunday night Chicago).  For those who haven"t seen the BTCUSD price performance relative to other bubbles throughout history, or for those who are buying out of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out), take a moment to review the following chart.  


Bitcoin Tulip Bubble


 


BTCUSD (Bitcoin) Weekly Technical Analysis


 


BTCUSD (Bitcoin) Daily Technical Analysis


 


 


Ethereum (ETHUSD) Weekly/Daily



Ethereum (ETHUSD) is seeing strong profittaking today, forming what appears to be upchannel resistance (on the daily chart).  The rally yesterday to just above 700 fulfills the 300 in gains that could have been projected based on the approximate height of the ascending triangle (as calculated from the mid May low of 100 to the triangle resistance at 400), and the point of triangle breakout at 400.   After another day or so of further consolidation, ETHUSD may want to retest the same upchannel resistance at 700 especially as BTCUSD stands a decent chance of reaching for the psychologically key 20,000 whole figure level (which BTCUSD nearly did with a rise to over 19500 last Thursday on GDAX) ahead of the highly anticipated CME Bitcoin futures launch Monday (Sunday night Chicago).  The weekly and daily MACD are still sloping strongly up, suggesting bulls will continue buying on pullbacks. 


 


ETHUSD Weekly Technical Analysis


 


ETHUSD (Ethereum) Daily Technical Analysis


 


Click here for today"s technical analysis on USDCAD 


Tradable Patterns was launched to demonstrate that the patterns recurring in liquid futures, spot FX and cryptocurrency markets can be analyzed to enhance trading performance. Tradable Patterns’ daily newsletter provides technical analysis on a subset of three CME/ICE/Eurex futures (commodities, equity indices, and interest rates), spot FX and cryptocurrency markets, which it considers worth monitoring for the day/week for trend reversal or continuation. For less experienced traders, tutorials and workshops are offered online and throughout Southeast Asia.


Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Finally, Gold Speculators Start To Bail, Setting Up A Big Q1 2018

 




Finally, Gold Speculators Start To Bail, Setting Up A Big Q1 2018


Posted with permission and written by John Rubino, Dollar Collapse 


 



Finally, Gold Speculators Start To Bail, Setting Up A Big Q1 2018 - John Rubino


 


It took a lot longer than it should have, but gold futures traders have finally started behaving “normally.” The speculators who were extremely, stubbornly long – and who are usually wrong when they’re this excited — had maintained their over-optimistic bets when they should have been stampeding for the exits, making the last few months both boring and depressing for gold bugs and related investors.


 


This departure from the familiar script raised questions about whether the action in futures (aka paper gold) was still relevant in the age of Chinese physical gold exchanges and cryptocurrency. The jury’s still out on that one, but for now the numbers are reassuring.


 


The following table (courtesy of GoldSeek) shows speculators cutting way back on long bets and adding to short bets, while the “commercials” – who tend to be right at sharp turns — did the opposite, going a lot less short.


 




 


Same thing only more so in silver, where another week like the last one will bring net positions into balance for both groups, which has historically been extremely bullish.


 




 


Here’s the same data depicted graphically for gold: Note how both the speculators (silver columns) and the commercials (red columns) held their positions from spring into fall, producing the previously-mentioned boredom and depression. Also note the sharp drop in the most recent reporting week.


 




 


The numbers we’re seeing here are as of Tuesday the 5th, and the final three days of last week were a bloodbath for precious metals, so it’s highly likely that the next COT numbers – due out on Friday the 15th – will show absolute panic among speculators, leading to an even bigger swing in the right direction.


 


If history is still reliable, January will be a great month to own precious metals and mining stocks.


 


 


Questions or comments about this article? Leave your thoughts HERE.


 


 


 


 


Finally, Gold Speculators Start To Bail, Setting Up A Big Q1 2018


Posted with permission and written by John Rubino, Dollar Collapse 


 


 


 


Check out these other articles by our contributors:


 



CPM Group’s Jeff Christian Responds “NEGATIVELY” To The SRSrocco Report On Silver Investment Demand - Steve St. Angelo





Eric Sprott Forecasts Status Quo Now, But Big Rally in 2018 (Weekly Wrap-Up, December 8, 2017)

Monday, December 11, 2017

Interactive Brokers Allows Long-Only Bitcoin Futures Trading (At 50% Margin)

Following the "successful" launch of Bitcoin futures overnight, Interactive Brokers - whose founder had been adamantly against the CME/CBOE product over risk concerns - has enabled clients to trade the crypto-craziness on its platform... but with some notable constraints.


Interactive Brokers began offering clients the ability to trade bitcoin futures at the start of trading on the Cboe Futures Exchange (CFE) on Sunday night, December 10th, 2017.








“Interactive Brokers was on the buy side of the low print of 14,710,” said Thomas Peterffy, founder, Chairman and CEO of Interactive Brokers.


 


“A Registered Investment Advisor on the Interactive Brokers platform purchased two March contracts in the first minute of trading.”



However, as Interactive Brokers explains, there are some notable constraints...








Due to the extreme volatility of cryptocurrencies, clients will be unable to assume a short position.


 


In addition, only limit orders will be accepted.


 


IBKR’s margin requirement on long positions will be at least 50%.


 


The company will continue to monitor concerns surrounding the market"s ability to process bitcoin futures risk.



Billionaire crypto fund manager Mike Novogratz was on tape this morning, speaking positively about the launch of Bitcoin futures,








“The market trades like it wants to go up, not down...We are in a speculative mania and my sense is we are still fairly early.”



For now, Bitcoin futures prices are holding their gains, outperforming spot Bitcoin and spot Gold...










Eric Peters: Today"s Opportunities Include Negative Convexity, Complexity, Illiquidity, Leverage, Or All The Above

From the latest Weekend Notes by Eric Peters, CIO of One River Asset Management


Anecdote


“What are the odds we come across an opportunity in the coming 4yrs to earn 20%?” the investor asked his team.


“High,” they answered. “The odds are 100%,” he said, having seen this movie a few times. “So our cost of capital is 5% per year (20% divided by 4yrs), plus the 1% we earn on cash,” he said. His team nodded.


“Under no circumstances should we deploy capital unless it earns well more than 6% per year from here on out.” It made sense.


“What do we see that earns more than this hurdle?” he asked. His team’s list was as short today as it was long in 2016, 2011, 2009, 2003, 1998, 1997, 1994, 1992, 1990, 1987, etc. Today’s few opportunities have much in common with previous peaks: negative convexity, complexity, illiquidity, leverage, and/or all the above.


Investors confuse a 7.5% average annualized return target with a 7.5% annual return target,” he explained. “They’re entirely different things.”


Targeting average annualized returns allows you to accept what the market gives you, while targeting annual returns forces you to leverage investments near peak valuations to hit your bogey. “Typical pension and endowment boards want incoming investment returns to consistently exceed outgoing flows.”


So most investors attempt to produce the highest return every year, no matter what it takes. “But that’s the wrong objective. Never underestimate the value of cash and patience in achieving the real goal; superior returns over the complete cycle,” he explained.


“Markets tell you what to do if you listen,” he said. “Near the highs, few opportunities exist to earn substantial returns, so you should take little risk. Near the lows, opportunities to earn attractive returns are abundant.” You should take a lot of risk. “This sounds simple because it is. It’s obvious. But obvious is not easy.”









All You Need To Know About Today"s Bitcoin Futures Contract

CBOE Global Markets Inc and CME Group Inc will launch futures contracts on bitcoin on Dec. 10 and Dec. 17 respectively. Here are some of the differences between the products to be offered by the exchange operators.



CONTRACT UNIT


  • The Cboe Bitcoin Futures Contract will use the ticker XBT and will equal one bitcoin.

  • The CME Bitcoin Futures Contract will use the ticker BTC and will equal five bitcoins.

PRICING AND SETTLEMENT


  • Both Cboe’s and CME’s bitcoin futures contracts will be settled in U.S. dollars, allowing exposure to the bitcoin without actually having to hold any of the cryptocurrency.

  • Cboe’s contract will be priced off of a single auction at 4 p.m. Eastern time (2100 GMT) on the final settlement date on the Gemini cryptocurrency exchange.

  • CME’s contract will be priced off of the CME Bitcoin Reference Rate, an index that references pricing data from cryptocurrency exchanges, currently made up of Bitstamp, GDAX, itBit and Kraken.

TRADING HOURS


  • Cboe’s XBT contract will trade on CFE, with regular trading hours of 9:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Eastern time on Mondays and 9:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m Tuesday through Friday. Extended hours will be 6 p.m. Sunday to 9:30 a.m. Monday, and 4:30 p.m. Monday through to 9:30 a.m. Friday.

  • CME’s BTC will trade on CME Globex and CME ClearPort Sunday to Friday from 6 p.m. - 5 p.m. Eastern time with a one-hour break each day beginning at 5 p.m.

MARGIN RATE AND CLEARING


  • Cboe’s contract will clear through the Options Clearing Corporation and a 30 percent margin rate will apply.

  • CME’s contract will clear through CME ClearPort and will have a 35 percent initial margin rate.

CONTRACT EXPIRATIONS


  • Cboe said it may list up to four weekly contracts, three near-term serial months, and three months on the March quarterly cycle.

  • CME said it will list monthly contracts for the nearest two months in the March quarterly cycle (March, June, Sept., Dec.) plus the nearest two serial months not in the March quarterly cycle.

PRICE LIMITS AND TRADING HALTS


  • Cboe will halt trading in its contract for 2 minutes if the best bid in the XBT futures contract closest to expiration is 10 percent or more above or below the daily settlement price of that contract on the prior business day.

  • Once trading resumes, if the best bid in the XBT futures contract closest to expiration is 20 percent or more above or below the daily settlement price of that contract on the prior business day, the futures will be halted for 5 minutes.

  • CME will apply price limits, also known as circuit breakers, to its bitcoin futures of 7 percent, 13 percent, and 20 percent to the futures fixing price. Trading will not be allowed outside of the 20 percent price limit.

Sources: Reuters, Cboe, and CME









Sunday, December 10, 2017

Bitcoin"s Growing Price Gap Between Exchanges Creates Potential Headaches For Futures Trading

On Thursday, as the Bitcoin price made record high after record high, spiking to somewhere between $16,000-19,500, it was one of the top stories across mainstream media outlets, never mind Reuters, Bloomberg and the FT.



However, what exactly was the all-time high for Bitcoin? Because of Bitcoin"s growing "price gap", it depended where you looked. But a price gap of more than $3,000…really? Actually yes, as Bloomberg explains.


Bitcoin traded above $19,000 on Thursday, but you may have missed it. As it was reaching $19,500 just after 11 a.m. on the GDAX exchange, which is run by the popular bitcoin brokerage firm Coinbase, bitcoin was still stuck in the high $15,000"s on other trading platforms. Similarly, most U.S. traders woke up on Thursday to news that bitcoin was above $15,000, unless they were following it on Bitfinex, where it didn"t cross $15,000 until soon before 10 a.m.



This is nothing new. Bitcoin trades on dozens of exchanges, and the prices get out of whack at times. But as the price of bitcoin rises more rapidly into the tens of thousands, the gap seems to be getting worse. It was particularly bad on Thursday, when for several hours in the morning the difference between the price of bitcoin on the exchanges remained thousands of dollars, more than the total price of bitcoin just a few months ago.



The chart below compares the price of Bitcoin on two separate exchanges, GDAX and BitStamp, from 12.00am to 5.00pm yesterday.



To some extent, this might not seem to matter, Bloomberg suggests. So what if you could sell at a higher price on GDAX, it’s likely that you paid a higher price in the first place. As we discussed yesterday, GDAX is Coinbase’s exchange and the higher price probably reflects  Coinbase being the easiest way for new Bitcoin investors to participate. And…let’s face it, most investors in Bitcoin have been making money. Furthermore, yesterday was an unusual day as the whole world seem to be momentarily gripped by Bitcoin mania. Congestion problems on the Gemini exchange, for example, forced it to suspend redemptions for several hours.


While people might not care about the price divergence right now, they might do in the next few days. As we know only too well, Bitcoin trading is about to change dramatically, with the launch of the CBOE and CME Bitcoin futures contracts. The former starts trading on Sunday after which investors will be able to buy, sell and short the Bitcoin price without having to buy the digital currency itself. Unlike the current Bitcoin exchanges, the futures exchanges are heavily regulated (except when it comes to trading gold and silver, of course).


The intersection of trading on "wild west" Bitcoin exchanges with conventional futures exchanges is a potentially dangerous mix. While the CEO of ICE, which owns the NYSE, has lamented that the CBOE and CME have beaten him in launching Bitcoin products. He also said this week that his organisation wouldn’t be offering futures contracts soon due to the lack of transparency and structural integrity in existing Bitcoin markets. Those cautionary words are looking prescient all of a sudden. As Bloomberg notes.


The price gap creates some structural problems for the futures market. Consider hedging. The Cboe and the CME contracts will reference prices on different exchanges. So if investors are trying to hedge a bitcoin purchase, they will have to make sure they buy bitcoins on an exchange that matches up most closely with a particular contract.


But the bigger problem is that the price gap gives some credence to Sprecher"s argument. Large price spreads indicate liquidity problems and a lack of active professional dealers or traders who would normally arbitrage these differences away rapidly. Less liquidity suggests prices will drop more quickly when they inevitability do, though not everyone agrees.



Paul Puey, the CEO of Airbitz, a bitcoin wallet company, told me on Thursday that bitcoin"s fractured market was a feature, not a bug. If a large trade were to start a tumble in one exchange, the prices would be safe elsewhere, the thinking goes, though I"m not sure I believe that the bitcoin whales wouldn"t rush in to sell on a sustained plunge.



On balance, Bloomberg comes down favourably on the introduction of Bitcoin futures trading, expecting it to reduce volatility. However, any conviction is lacking as Bloomberg Gadfly analyst, Stephen Gandel, acknowledges that he might be wrong and it could have the opposite effect.


And more liquidity by way of the futures market should make bitcoin prices less volatile. But it could go the other way, too. A drop in the price could send futures traders heading for the exits, stoking more fears in the traditional bitcoin exchanges. That could create negative feedback loops, like the ones in mortgage markets during the financial crisis. What"s more, if there is some pent-up demand to short bitcoin, a rush of traders could cause futures to plunge when they start trading, pushing down the price of bitcoins.



Exactly.


As the clock running down to futures trading, we are waiting to see whether big banks and “official” interventionists launch a pre-emptive strike in a desperate effort to cool the Bitcoin bull market. Whether or not that happens, we aren’t convinced that Bitcoin’s volatility, or its price, will be tamed for long.









Friday, December 8, 2017

Gold Hangs Above 2016 Low Despite BTC (Now in BitCon Futures), Brexit Deal,Tax Bill, and Fund Pukers







The only thing that truly trends is humans extrapolating their rates of return emotionally. Everything else will regress to the mean at some point.  


Investors are being given a gift and do not see it. Every rally in stocks should be used to lighten exposure to a crash  and every corresponding dip in gold should be bought from a balanced portfolio approach.  You should be peeling back equity exposure on every new high and adjusting your risk into something that is stable, holds buying power, and is liquid. That is the point of investing. Your home, your art, and your bitcoin will not fit those guidelines. Gold and silver do.


Do you think the millennials will be buying your 401k shares in 5 Years? Don’t be naive. No one went broke banking profits. And the Fed is handing you an opportunity retire with enough money now as they have moved the housing bubble back into the stock market. It took 10 years. Do you have another 10 years to wait if we crap out again? Protect your profits now. 



 


Admittedly the title sounds like a Gold Bull rationalizing a losing position, as so many gold salesmen do, and we are long and are not selling you Gold. We are also swing trading from the short side. So it is what it is.


It"s jobs day and noone really thnks that matters to Fed policy anymore,  Brexit breakthrough agreed, and shutdown avoided for now. A couple points before getting to the reason for our title. Let’s first count the ways in which Gold has had to deal with bad news these past 2 months. 


Counting the Ways Gold is Bashed


Fund liquidation, Trump Tax Bill, Bitcoin, Brexit deal, Venezuela default (bearish for gold as they had to sell), and the usual short side players with deeper Fed sponsored  pockets than the longs woth which they do battle. These are a few of Gold’s obstacles these past couple months. And yet here we are $100 above last years lows. 


Kicking Gold Today’s Edition


The Brexit deal and Govt shutdown avoidance alluded to above, along with the end of year puke-age and Trump’s Tax Bill (as we have written about here extensively) have all been major negatives for Gold the past few weeks. And yet gold sells off (again) before the news comes out.. strange... 


To be fair, we are seeing more longs with end of year hopes dashed selling these last couple days. There are some shorts getting in now however. Just not enough to spur  a sustainable  a rally we think. 


Banks and The Fed in Bed Again And Gold Suffers for It


Post 2008 banks have been on the outs with The Fed as risk managers. The Fed had mandated more risk be cleared through exchanges. And they have succeeded somewhat.


In doing so, the border collies that run our monetary system have herded much derivative risk into a larger basket. TBTF became Bigger and more centralized (like Fannie Mae..).Their reason is this basket is more easily watched, and since they regulate exchanges, can be “advised” on policy.


But along comes an existential threat not just to global fiat backed governments, but to the US Banks that are their overlords. And boom! They have a common enemy. And that Enemy is Bitcoin.


Gold is suffering real collateral damage now as the banks pitch their new wonderful product to replace gold.. and it’s having an effect. 


BTC Futures: Regulation and Repression to Follow


Note the complete banking industry turnabout to hailing BTC as the new gold on the coincidental heels of new futures contracts approved by the CFTC. Banks and brokers have a new product to sell you folks, and they are actually calling it a store of value, a new gold, if you will. This is in complete contrast not just to BTC behavior (volatile and a wealth generating currency, but don’t call it money yet), but to gold itself (low volatility, wealth preserver, money but not currency)  Line up suckers for a new product to be castrated, regulated, and repressed by banks through exchanges with government blessing and oversight. People not long  Bitcoins will be buying futures on margin while banks long BTC  will be hedging and killing their much shallower pocketed but greedy clients. Let the fleecing begin in the NEW GOLD.  JPM Calls BTC “New Gold”; Spoofing Starts Monday



Love Michael, Hate it When he’s Right


Michael Moor has been spot-on in handicapping market moves given price triggers. Read UPDATE: “Bear Trend with a $1700 Target” Has Problems for more. He saw for different reasons than us, a large bull move fermenting last month. He gave a level where that was negated. That level was breached. Now,to our chagrin, he’s called this sell-off from the $1272 area very nicely. In the process, he stopped us from buying dips for now. But we wish he’d see the end.. for our sake! 


UPDATING OUR LEVELS


1-Our macro trade system says we should be out If the market is here come December 31.


2-The VBS indicator has yet to be triggered for a longer term volatility expansion. So according to that indicator we are still in a trading range, hard as that is to feel when you are long as we are. 


 


Point being; Nothing has Changed


We made the observation that funds like to get in above the 12 month MA for punts. They did and they are now puking. We have a long position based on this and are swing trading around it. 


We secondly stated that volatility would be expanding in 90 days. We are 45 into that and things are starting to percolate. We did say November would be one to remember. So that was a bit premature.


We believed a $50 move one way was coming which would cause  a spike in volatility and a follow up move anywhere between $50 and $200.


All of this is in play and lining up from our original statements to today’s activity.


The only thing you have to ask yourself is will you be in a position to buy gold if it drops another $50 and then another $100 from there. Because that is what gold is for. It is to be bought when it gets cheaper. We will be buying to hold for 12-18 months at least as we roll equity profits into wealth preservation vehicles. We will also be trading it from both sides of the table. But this is what we do professionally. 


You should be peeling back equity exposure on every new high and adjusting risk into something that is stable, holds buying power, and is liquid. Your home, your art, and your bitcoin will not fit those guidelines. Gold and silver do.


On combination, Michael says we may have another $30 or so of downside coming. This would trigger the VBS indicating a $50-$200 move relatively quickly in one or the other direction. 


Which brings us back to our original post a month ago declaring volatility is soon to expand in about 90 days. We also stated then a $50 move in either direction will yield another $200 in continuation or reversal of that first move. 








VBS Trading Algo Levels for Gold Oct 25th


Notes From a call today on potential gold trades.


  1. It looks like we will be seeing a move of $50 to $75 in either direction in the next 90 days. 

  2. That move could be slow and orderly, or fits and starts, that is not handicappable  or important to the system

  3. If a move like above occurs, then we will most definitely get a signal to be long Vol. on a risk reward basis as the monthly indicator will expand

  4.  Directionally, our first play would be to go with the direction at time of the trigger. Our second would be to stop and reverse at a predetermined level.

  5. this is a longer term play than usual for the VBAS so we will most likely express the position traditional way via long straddles. 

  6. Direction would then be expressed by NOT hedging gamma on daily break evens but more like every 2 weeks, and then only half of accumulated deltas. In this way we would remain long/ short in direction of the trend.

Monthly:


  1. Buy straddles or hedged call spreads on a monthly settlement above 1305 or below 1191 [Edit- now $1338 and $1192 per chart below]

  2. early entry- put on 1/2 position on a day signal as described above.

  3. exit everything on 3 bars if not profitable. 

  4. Gamma hedging TBD.


Monthly chart updated today. Gold has dropped approximately $35 thus far from that call. A $75 drop from Oct 25th"s level would be in shouting distance of $1192 and likely trigger the indicator of even higher volatility.



The plan is: Gold drops $50 from that post date, triggering the VBS for expanding volatility. 


At that point one either goes with the trend, or waits for a quick exhaustive selloff and reversal for a major rally. In simple terms: of Gold trades $1192, it will not sir there long. We will sell if it hits there, initiating a short. But that is only to keep our finger on the pulse. Having a position in a market heightens your radar and forces you to respect your discipline. Doing so will tell us if being short is wrong. This will in turn mean being long is right. And we will reverse hard. 


So, here’s to a market dump to $1193 and what could be the beginning of a new run higher. Yes, VBS also implies lower is equally possible from $1193, but given the seasonal nature of Gold and it’s tendency to make lows at end of the year as funds sell, we’re optimistic that the buy low and sell high rule of investment will replace our current swing trading behavior of selling weakness and buying it lower. This as we described all part of trading around a core long position. We’d love to start swing- trading from the long side with a core long position. Stay tuned.


Previously:



About the author:Vince Lanci has 27 years’ experience trading Commodity Derivatives. Retired from active trading in 2008 after netting $90MM in an Energy arbitrage strategy he devised for a NY hedge fund; Vince now manages personal investments through his Echobay entity and advises natural resource firms on market risk. Over the years, his expertise and testimony have been requested in energy, precious metals, and derivative fraud cases. Lanci is known for his passion in identifying unfairness in market structure and uneven playing fields going back to his first anonymous Zerohedge post on Silver. He remains a contributor to Kitco, Zerohedge, and Marketslant on such topics. Vince contributes to Bloomberg and Reuters finance articles as well. He continues to lead the Soren K. Group of writers on Marketslant. 


Bloomberg reports:


Progress


An early-morning breakthrough on Brexit first-round negotiations takes the process toward the next stage of forging the U.K.’s post-exit relationship with the European Union. The thorny issue of the Irish border was effectively parked while outline agreements on citizen rights and the divorce bill were achieved.  Leading Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage labeled the deal a “humiliation.” Gilts dropped and the pound remained relatively unchanged in the wake of the deal. 


Bank rally


Shares in European lenders are soaring this morning, with the Stoxx 600 Banks Index climbing as much as 3 percent, after Basel III capital rules will see “no significant increase” in provisioning for the institutions. The final batch of post-crisis regulations announced yesterday will see requirements decline for some large banks. The agreement and culmination of intense lobbying removes a regulatory risk which had been hanging over the sector for almost a decade. 


Markets rise


Overnight, the MSCI Asia Pacific Index added 0.6 percent, while Japan’s Topix index closed 1 percent higher following data showing the country’s economy expanded faster than expected. In Europe, the surge in bank shares is lifting the Stoxx 600 Index, which was trading 0.9 percent higher at 5:45 a.m. S&P 500 futures added 0.3 percent, the 10-year Treasury yield was at 2.389 percent and gold continued its recent slide. 


Shutdown


Congress sent President Donald Trump a bill extending federal funding for government spending to Dec. 22, avoiding a shutdown which was scheduled to begin today. Lawmakers, who already have a busy schedule coming into the year end, will seek to resolve issues on spending limits in the next couple of weeks which would allow for agreement on a longer-term budget.









Thursday, December 7, 2017

Banks Issue Last Minute Warning About Risks Of Bitcoin Futures, Ask Regulator For Review

As we countdown to the launch of bitcoin futures trading on the CBOE (10 December) and CME (18 December), the big banks – via the Futures Industry Association - have suddenly got cold feet about the risks. We don"t blame them, somebody"s going to get hurt, the only question is who. The banks are worried it could be them. The FIA’s “primary” members include all of the usual suspects like JPM, Goldman, Citi, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, etc. The risk they are most concerned about relates to clearing houses which, ultimately, they stand behind. The problem, of course, boils down to Bitcoin’s volatility, something we flagged after the CME announced circuit breakers early last month.


Having taken a gamble on bitcoin futures, which are set to begin trading by the end of the year, the CME is now seeking to avoid the consequences of what has emerged as both the cryptocurrency"s best and worst selling point: its unprecedented volatility…While the CME already uses daily vol limits on most other markets, including crude, gold and market futures, to temporarily halt trading when price swings get out of control, the CME has never before dealt with something like bitcoin



In June, Bloomberg showed how Bitcoin’s 30-day volatility had risen to 100%, which was comparable (at the time) with one of the most volatile financial instruments they (and we) could probably think of - a three-times levered ETF in junior gold miners.



The CME has proposed three trading limits for Bitcoin futures, 7%, 13% or 20% up or down from the previous day’s closing price. The first two thresholds, for 7% and 13% moves, are “soft” limits, which would trigger a two-minute pause in trading of bitcoin futures. The 20% limit would be a hard stop after which trading would be halted. In the first ten months of Bitcoin trading in 2017, Coindesk calculated there had been 69 days in which Bitcoin moved at least 7%, 11 days in which it moved 13% and two days in which it moved 20%. In fact, we had another 20% intra-day move on 29 November 2017.



As the Financial Times reports, the banks – via the Futures Industry Association – is sending a letter to the CFTC which it will publish today.


The world’s largest banks are pushing back on the introduction of bitcoin futures, raising concerns with US regulators that the financial system is ill-prepared for the launch of the contracts as the value of the volatile cryptocurrency has soared. On Wednesday, the price of bitcoin climbed to a fresh record high of more than $14,000. Institutional investors have been keen to trade the asset but only via a regulated market.



However, the planned launch in the next 10 days of futures contracts by the Chicago exchanges CME Group and CBOE Global Markets, given a green light from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission last week, has prompted a backlash among the major brokers who backstop trading across the industry. The Futures Industry Association, the main futures industry lobby group, plans to send a letter to the CFTC that will be published on Thursday.



We could be forgiven for thinking this is all very “last minute”. The CME announced its launch of Bitcoin futures trading back in October and had been canvassing opinion from market participants, including the banks, for months beforehand. The FT confirms that it was seen a draft of the FIA’s letter in which the latter states that the introduction of Bitcoin futures “did not allow for proper public transparency and input”. This is self-evident, resulting from the launch of futures trading contracts being fast-tracked by all parties after Bitcoin’s price rose parabolically this year. As part of this fast track process, the CME and CBOE adopted a “self-certified regime” for the contracts, meaning that the normal regulatory oversight didn’t take place. As the FT notes, the FIA is belatedly calling for a review.


Using it (self-certified regime) for “these novel products does not align with the potential risks that underlie their trading and should be reviewed”, the draft reads. The CFTC warned last week during its approval process that the emerging cryptocurrency markets were largely unregulated and the agency had “limited statutory authority”. “It is also our understanding that not all risk committees of the relevant exchanges were consulted before the certification to launch these products,” the letter added.



Getting into the “nitty gritty”, even though the banks have been discussing the specification of the contracts for about six months (according to the CME), as the moment of truth approaches, they’ve “zeroed in” on the fragility of clearing houses. With so much Bitcoin trading occurs on other exchanges and outside the hours of CME/CBOE (even if they trade Sundays), the banks have realised their vulnerability.


Futures brokers are worried they will bear the brunt of the risk associated with bitcoin futures, because the margin that backstops the contract is placed in a clearing house. Clearing houses stand between two parties in a trade, managing the risk to the rest of the market if one side should default. They are mutually funded in part by banks to guard against the failure of their largest members. Several brokers among the top 10 largest providers have privately confirmed to the Financial Times that they will not clear the products immediately.



One clearing broker said that it would be open-minded about cryptocurrencies, as they were US dollar products, but only if they were “properly controlled and regulated”. However he added: “We’d still be on the hook in a worst-case scenario as we are exposed as members of the clearing house.”



Sometimes “old heads” are useful in these circumstances. Speaking on Bloomberg TV, Royal Bank of Scotland Chairman, Howard Davies, said he would advise the CME and CBOE against launching Bitcoin futures.


"I’m not quite sure that they know enough about what the underlying is, about the nature of the supply and demand of the underlying. I think it would be a very risky move for them in reputation terms. This is irrational exuberance. This is a very, very unusual market, that shows we’re not in a normal two- way trading market. Blockchain is much more interesting. The idea of a distributed ledger, which makes transactions and payment systems much cheaper and faster in real time is a good one. Blockchain, I think, has got life in it.”



Thomas Peterrfy, the founder, Chairman and CEO of Interactive Brokers (the one who fronts the company’s slightly irritating TV ads) is one of the “giants” of electronic trading in US financial markets. The FT noted Interactive Brokers" stance.


”Thomas Peterffy, a pioneer of electronic trading and head of Interactive Brokers, has warned that the introduction of bitcoin futures into a clearing house could increase systemic risk. On Wednesday Interactive said its clients would be unable to short the bitcoin futures market because of the extreme volatility of bitcoin.



It looks like the banks have realised Peterffy might be right in limiting trading of Bitcoin futures.









The End Is Near?

 




The End Is Near?


Written by Craig Hemke, Sprott Money News & TF Metals Report


 





The End Is Near? - Craig Hemke

 


For gold investors, the major thorn in our side continues to be the USDJPY so we need to discuss it again.


 


Over the past weekend at TFMR, we had a discussion about how so many well-intentioned people could have been so wrong about "the metals" over the past five years. It included this sentence: "What we failed to predict was the successful, collective manipulation of nearly all "markets" by the CBs, their primary dealers and their willing/sycophant media through HFT."


 


That one sentence could be the subject of a full post or podcast but, for now, let"s just focus upon the market manipulation through HFT. As you know by now, the USDJPY is just about the single most important general input for HFT buy/sell decisions. Whether it"s S&P futures, bond futures or Comex Gold, the direction of the USDJPY generally impacts all of these "markets" more than anything else. The chart below plots the inverse of USDJPY (JPYUSD) with gold futures. Note clear correlation that began in 2008.


 


 




 


 



 


 


In observing the central bank market manipulation...when we see the same pattern again and again...and this pattern is followed by the desired equity or bond market reaction...then you know something is up. How many times have we captured screenshots of the BoJ, Fed, SNB or whomever buying the USDJPY in size at just the right moment to create and paint a double bottom on the chart? From there, how many times have we watched a near perfect and uninterrupted, 45-degree angle recovery ensue?


 


Here are just a couple of egregious examples that I just chose at random from my desktop folder that holds about 40 charts. (I"ve only been keeping them since late summer.)


 


 




 


 


 


 



 


 


Well, since we just used the term "egregious", let"s apply it again to the charts below. Recall that things were sailing along surprisingly well last Monday. Over the previous week, the USDJPY had failed to hold support near 113 and again near 112 and it had fallen to near and just below the very-important 111 level. Then, as we chronicled that day, a sudden spike occurred on NO NEWS and not even any rumors. Just a spike from out of the blue that drove the pair immediately back above 111.


 


 




 


 


And what followed over the next five days? Well, outside of the sudden plunge on the now disproven stories from Brian Ross at ABC News, the USDJPY has followed the same glide path all the way back to 113. Also, IT"S VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE where USDJPY reopened Sunday afternoon...RIGHT ON the glidepath. Remove the reaction to Friday"s unexpected headlines and it"s a near-perfect, 45-degree angle for nearly FIVE FULL DAYS.


 


 




 


 



 


 


(And in case you"re wondering which tail wags which dog, note the turn in USDJPY last Monday clearly preceded the turn in the S&P.)


 


How is this even possible? It"s not...well, at least not in the traditional and "free market" sense...the pre-2008 and pre-2012 sense. All of these things used to move somewhat independently as human, carbon-based traders made rational investment decisions based upon a number of inputs. However, in 2017, where 90% of all trading is now done through HFT....well, the results are pretty clear. The Central Banks and their Primary Dealer trading desks manipulate the key inputs and HFT does the rest. This is why yours truly and so many other "experts and mavens" have been confounded for the past five years. It"s not nefarious intent and it"s not because gold bugs are cruel, heartless charlatans who are intent upon stealing as many dollars as possible from the easily-duped. Instead, it is a failure to anticipate the levels to which The Central Banks would successfully go to keep their system alive.


 


Understanding this is why you consistently hear me cite the refrain of PHYSICAL DEMAND. It is only through a renewed crisis of confidence that this system can be broken...at least as it pertains to the precious metals. Physical demand will bust The Bullion Banks by breaking their just-in-time and unallocated delivery system. Physical demand will force price to be discovered through the exchange of physical metal, not the alchemized digital garbage that permeates the system today.


 


We"ll leave you today with stories from each end of The Bank monster. The first, and one that we"ve been following closely since last March, is the continued run-up to renewed war on The Korean Peninsula. WHILE NO ONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND IS CHEERING THIS ON, it is important to be prepared for all of the unknown unknowns that would come with such a catastrophe, one of them being financial calamity that could again shatter confidence in the current system.


 



http://theweek.com/articles/740264/why-north-korea...


 


And the other story deals with gold alchemy and the continued shunting of physical demand into sham/scam paper investments. It seems the World Gold Council is hungry to increase their fees. They are apparently planning to offer a whole new "gold" ETF, perhaps designed to compete with the IAU. Ask yourself, from where will this fund get the 200-300 metric tonnes of gold needed to fund its "inventory"? Once again, The Banks will simply perform the alchemy of leveraging current unallocated stockpiles into more and more digital "gold".


 



http://www.etf.com/sections/daily-etf-watch/new-ph...


 


Again, true physical demand is the only antidote to the poison created by the Central Bankers and the Bullion Banks. Sadly, 2018 promises another surge in war, debt, negative interest rates and de-dollarization. Will these events finally prompt enough physical demand to break The Banks? Only time will tell.


 


 


 


Questions or comments about this article? Leave your thoughts HERE.


 


 


 


The End Is Near?


Written by Craig Hemke, Sprott Money News & TF Metals Report


 


 


Check out these other articles by our contributors:




Craig Hemke -   Another Tradable Low Coming


John Rubino - Finally, An Honest Inflation Index – Guess What It Shows


Jeff Thomas - Tilt! Game Over



Ask The Expert: Jim Willie