Showing posts with label Bank of Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bank of Canada. Show all posts

Saturday, December 16, 2017

Bank of Canada Governor Is Right To Be Worried About The Economy

 


Bank of Canada Governor Is Right To Be Worried About The Economy


Written by Peter Diekmeyer, Sprott Money News


 


 



Stephen Poloz Right To Be Worried - Peter Diekmeyer

 


Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz cited numerous worries plaguing the economy during his speech to Toronto’s financial elites yesterday at the prestigious Canadian Club.





However, the title of Poloz’s presentation, “Three things keeping me awake at night” seemed odd, given positive recent Canadian employment, GDP and other data.





Poloz highlighted high personal debts, housing prices, cryptocurrencies and other causes for concern, along with actions that the BoC is taking to alleviate them. His implicit message was (as always) “We have things under control.”





But if that’s all true, then Canada’s central bank governor should be sleeping like a baby. So, what is really keeping Mr. Poloz up at night? Three possibilities come to mind.





The Poloz Bubble




Firstly, far from just a housing bubble, Canada’s economy shows signs of being in the midst of an “everything bubble.” Bitcoin, for example, hovered near CDN $23,000 this week. Stock and bond valuations are not far behind in their relative loftiness.





Worse for Poloz, who took office four years ago, his fingerprints are all over those bubble-like levels.





Canadian stock, bond and house prices were already at dizzying heights when Stephen Harper hired Poloz with the implicit expectation that he would juice up the economy, in preparation for what Canada’s then-Prime Minister knew would be a tough upcoming election.





Poloz didn’t disappoint, promptly delivering a nice Benjamin Strong-styled “coup de whiskey” to asset prices in the form of two interest rate cuts, which brought the BoC’s policy rate down to just 0.50% during the ensuing months.





Although Harper lost the election, loose BoC policy continues to provide the Canadian government with free money to borrow and spend as it wishes.





More broadly, the Poloz BoC’s current policy, like that of the US Federal Reserve, is to boost asset prices even higher in the hope that the resulting wealth effect will trickle down to spur economic activity among ordinary Canadians.






 


At the household level, the BoC’s low interest rates enticed Canadian families to borrow themselves to the hilt. Businesses haven’t been that far behind.





The upshot is that total government, private sector and personal debts are now in nosebleed territory with Canada’s economy seemingly on a knife’s edge, in danger of crumbling at the first patch of rough road.





Chained to a Ponzi




Another worry is that the Poloz BoC, by broadly mirroring the Federal Reserve’s actions, has firmly lashed Canada to a US economy which could prove to be an even bigger Ponzi than its own.





America’s “everything bubble”, like Canada’s, has been stroked by a central bank that has been pushing credit growth at a rate faster than GDP growth, a textbook Ponzi scenario.




 




 


One result, as Grant Williams, co-founder of Real Vision Television, noted in a recent presentation, is that US stock prices are currently far higher than they were during the Internet and housing bubbles. “[Central bankers] keep hoping that this time is different,” Williams warned. “But ladies and gentlemen – it’s never different.”





Refusal to ring fence Canada




Another worry for Poloz to ponder, is that although the BoC has identified financial system interconnectedness as a key concern, the central bank has done little to ring fence Canada’s economy from huge global macro threats on the horizon.





That’s particularly true of the hundreds of trillions of dollars in global derivatives books, many of which are unquantifiable, as they are trading outside of traditional exchanges. This threat is particularly acute, as it was the failure of AIG, a derivatives player, to cover its bets (not the subprime mortgage and Lehman implosions as most assume) that sparked the 2008 financial crisis.





Poloz, had he been ready to condone a recession, could have encouraged broader interest rate hikes to incentivize Canadian governments, businesses and households to pay down debts, build up savings and increase overall system stability.





Similarly, instead of building up Canada’s gold reserves to cushion against potential external shocks, the supposedly-independent BoC (as noted above) gives the money it prints to the big banks and the Canadian government to help it finance raises for politicians and bureaucrats.





Government and academic elites would argue that Poloz’s actions are understandable as he has only limited powers. They cite key constraints on the central bank’s actions.





These range from the BoC’s agreement with the Department of Finance to target 2% inflation, the fact that the government has primary authority over foreign exchange purchases and by realpolitik which dictates that Canada has to follow US policies – or else.





Tied to discredited Keynesian econometrics




Others, such as James Rickards, author of The Road to Ruin, would argue that Poloz is plagued with the same “group think” problem that faces Fed Chairmen.





Almost all the top economists these days, despite obvious brilliance, remain trapped by Keynesian/econometrics educations they endured to get their graduate degrees, which left them with few ideas regarding how to generate growth other than to print more money.





Canada’s top central banker rarely deviates from his talking points. So, it’s almost impossible to know what he really thinks.





However, a base case scenario suggests that Poloz (who has considerable private sector experience from his days at BCA Research) knows full well the treacherous position in which the BoC has placed the Canadian economy.





If that’s true, it’s little wonder that he is having trouble sleeping.


 


 


 


Questions or comments about this article? Leave your thoughts HERE.


 


 


 


 


Bank of Canada Governor Is Right To Be Worried About The Economy




Written by Peter Diekmeyer, Sprott Money News


 


 


Check out these other articles by our contributors:




Bitcoin Proves You Cannot Have Your Digital Cake and Eat it Too - Nathan McDonald


Political Pizza - Jeff Thomas


For Clues On The Economy, Follow The Money - Dave Kranzler




Eric Sprott Talks Lows in Gold, Comex Shenanigans, and Answers Your Questions (Weekly Wrap-Up, December 15, 2017)


 

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

Loonie Tumbles After BOC Keeps Rates On Hold, Signals "Continued Caution", "Considerable Uncertainty"

After two rate hikes earlier in the year, one of which caught traders by surprise, moments ago the Bank of Canada announced that it had kept its rate on hold at 1.00% as expected.


Stateing that "the global economy is evolving largely as expected in the Bank’s October Monetary Policy Report (MPR)" the central bank noted that while in the United States, "growth in the third quarter was stronger than forecast but is still expected to moderate in the months ahead." It added that "growth has firmed in other advanced economies. Meanwhile, oil prices have moved higher and financial conditions have eased."


Looking back the data was "in line with October’s outlook, which was for growth to moderate while remaining above potential in the second half of 2017." Employment growth has been very strong and wages have shown some improvement, supporting robust consumer spending in the third quarter. Business investment continued to contribute to growth after a strong first half, and public infrastructure spending is becoming more evident in the data. Following exceptionally strong growth earlier in 2017, exports declined by more than was expected in the third quarter. However,  the latest trade data support the MPR projection that export growth will resume as foreign demand strengthens. Housing has continued to moderate, as expected.


The BOC also noted that it "inflation has been slightly higher than anticipated and will continue to be boosted in the short term by temporary factors, particularly gasoline prices."








Measures of core inflation have edged up in recent months, reflecting the continued absorption of economic slack. Revisions to past quarterly national accounts have resulted in a higher level of GDP. However, this is unlikely to have significant implications for the output gap because the revisions also imply a higher level of potential output. Meanwhile, despite rising employment and participation rates, other indicators point to ongoing­ – albeit diminishing – slack in the labour market



However, while recent BOC announcement have sent the loonie surging, today the Canadian currency tumbled after it reiterated that it "while higher interest rates will likely be required over time, Governing Council will continue to be cautious, guided by incoming data in assessing the economy’s sensitivity to interest rates, the evolution of economic capacity, and the dynamics of both wage growth and inflation."


And another caution: "the global outlook remains subject to considerable uncertainty, notably about geopolitical developments and trade policies."


In immediate kneejerk response, the loonie is lower some 100 pips against the dollar, with the USDCAD rising to 1.2745 at publication time.










Monday, December 4, 2017

Crypto Surge Sparks Establishment Panic: Bans, Crackdowns, & Fatwas As Bitcoin "Undermines Governments, Destabilizes Economies"

The last few months have seen increasing notice being paid to Bitcoin (and the broader cryptocurrency space) by those that control the status quo.


At first it was simple "negative"-speak - "you"d be a fool to buy Bitcoin"-esque comments spewed forth from the truly ignorant or intentionally-ignorant (this group included bank CEOs, asset managers, payments systems, and remittance services) but to no avail, those fools saw the value of their bitcoins surge... Like the Winklevoss twins...



Then - as the price soared and the market cap of Bitcoin topped that of General Electric and Goldman sachs - the world"s central bankers began to take notice... but in their standard manner, played down any risks, explaining that any systemic fragility "was contained" since cryptocurrencies were not big enough (this group included various Fed presidents, Bank of Canada, Bank of France, Bank of Japan, Bank of Korea, and so on all echoing similar phrases)... even though Bitcoin is now the 6th largest currency in circulation...



But this week has seen a new group of establishmentarians jump on to the offensive against anti-decentralization, de-control, pro-freedom cryptocurrencies - urging bans, crackdowns, fatwas, taxation, creating their own cryptocurrencies, demanding citizens sell, and outright confiscation (this group includes governments world wide and their mainstream media mouthpieces)...


India


India"s finance minister, Arun Jaitley, has clarified that the government does not recognize bitcoin as legal tender. According to the Economic Times, when asked about the government"s plans to regulate the cryptocurrency, Jaitley told reporters, "recommendations are being worked at." He continued:


"The government"s position is clear, we don"t recognize this as legal currency as of now."



 

Concerned over bitcoin"s anonymity and its potential illicit uses, justices issued a notice to the central bank and other agencies asking them to answer a petition on the matter, reports indicated.


Turkey


Turkey has claimed Bitcoin is in fact “not compatible” with Islam due to its government being unable to control it.


In a statement from a meeting of the state Directorate of Religious Affairs (Diyanet), lawmakers said that Bitcoin’s “speculative” nature meant that buying and selling it was inappropriate for Muslims.


“Buying and selling virtual currencies is not compatible with religion at this time because of the fact that their valuation is open to speculation. They can be easily used in illegal activities like money laundering, and they are not under the state’s audit and surveillance,” Euronewstranslates the statement republished by local news outlet Enson Haber.



Diyanet added that the same principles of “unsuitability” in particular applied to Ethereum.


South Korea


Kim Dong-yeon, South Korea’s deputy prime minister and the minister of strategy and finance, revealed earlier this week that the government is investigating various methods to better regulate the local Bitcoin market and tax Bitcoin users accordingly.


While the South Korean government and its local financial authorities are actively discussing the possibility of enforcing a policy on Bitcoin taxation, at a press conference, Deputy Prime Minister Kim stated that the government does not intend to include any Bitcoin taxation policy in 2018’s amendment of the tax law.


Holland


A Dutch news paper urges its citizens to sell their bitcoins patriotically because cryptocurrencies can undermine government and destabilize the economy.


A bitcoin world can destabilize the real economy, a euro is also solidified trust.


First, the bitcoin undermines the government because a lot of transactions are about money laundering and tax avoidance. Another problem is that the profits of new bitcoins that come with it do not benefit the government (as with normal money creation), but are absorbed in heavily environmentally harmful computer power.


Central banks also have less influence on keeping the economy stable. In times of crisis, central banks can, through their influence on ordinary banks, ease credit conditions and encourage people to consume. The bank has no control over the bitcoin economy and an economic crisis can become deeper.


The investor has air in his hands when the bitcoin crashes, but also when the company turns out to produce baked air.


France


Putting money in an empty type of asset is “very, very worrying,” Robert Ophele, chairman of France’s market regulator. Bitcoin has no link to the real economy, Ophele says in a panel discussion at the Paris Europlace Financial Forum, warning that cryptocurrencies are a way to commit cybercrimes, allowing access to illicit goods and services.


If bitcoin was a currency, "it would be a bad one," Ophel exclaimed, as it poses major challenge for central banks and regulators.


UK


The Telegraph reported just around the time of the big drop, UK "ministers are launching a crackdown on the virtual currency Bitcoin amid growing concern it is being used to launder money and dodge tax."


Taking a page out of the Chinese playbook, the UK Treasury has announced plans to regulate the Bitcoin that will force traders in so-called crypto-currencies to disclose their identities and report suspicious activity. 


According to the Telegraph, while "until now, anybody buying and selling Bitcoins and other  digital currencies have been able to do so anonymously, making it attractive to criminals and tax avoiders. But the Treasury has now said it intends to begin regulating the virtual currency, which has a total value of £145 billion, to bring it in line with rules on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financial legislation."


 

 

John Mann, a member of the Treasury select committee, said he expected to hold an inquiry into the need for better regulation of Bitcoin and other alternative currencies in the new year.


 


He said: "These new forms of exchange are expanding rapidly and we"ve got to make sure we don"t get left behind - that"s particularly important in terms of money-laundering, terrorism or pure theft.


 


"I"m not convinced that the regulatory authorities are keeping up to speed. I would be surprised if the committee doesn"t have an inquiry next year. "It would be timely to have a proper look at what this means. It may be that we want speed up our use of these kinds of thing in this country, but that makes it all the more important that we don"t have a regulatory lag."



The proposed changes come amid increasing fears that Bitcoin is being used by gangs to launder the proceeds of crime while also attracting currency speculators - with the value of the coin soaring in the past 12 months.


In other words, the same reason why the IRS is cracking down on Coinbase clients in the US is also why UK and European regulators are joining China in cracking down on capital flight.


United States


The US Senate Judiciary Committee is currently tackling bill S.1241 that aims to criminalize the intentional concealment of ownership or control of a financial account. The bill also would amend the definition of ‘financial account’ and ‘financial institution’ to include digital currencies and digital exchanges, respectively. According to ranking committee member Senator Dianne Feinstein, the proposed bill is needed to modernize existing AML laws.


The bill would amend the definition of ‘financial institution,’ in Section 53412(a) of title 31, United States Code, to include:


“An issuer, redeemer, or cashier of prepaid access devices, digital currency, or any digital exchanger or tumbler of digital currency.”



If passed, the bill would likely have far-reaching effects for users of digital currencies both in the US and abroad.


Earlier reports also indicate that the White House is actively monitoring cryptocurrencies which could only mean more attempts to regulate the world’s first successful decentralized monetary system. With the growing involvement of Wall Street and the ever escalating media attention, it is not surprising that governments are stepping up their attempts to regulate digital currency.



image courtesy of CoinTelegraph


But as usual, any regulation-related-headline that the machines instantly sell, is bid back up, since it seems the algorithms have not figured out that there is no real way to "stop" Bitcoin... which is exactly why the world"s elite are so desparate.



Several industry commentators have issued their opinions on the various proposed laws. Tone Vays claimed that he expects a confrontation between the Bitcoin team, including the holders and users, and the US government.


“It’s bad... I think it’s gonna end in a very confrontational way between Bitcoin - even Bitcoin holders and users - and the US Government.”










Sunday, November 19, 2017

The Coming Economic Downturn In Canada

Authored by Deb Shaw via MarketsNow.com,



  • Canadian GDP growth has outperformed this year, helping the Canadian dollar

  • As GDP growth slows and the Bank of Canada turns neutral, catalysts turning negative

  • Crude oil and real estate look set for a downturn, with negative implications for the currency



Given its natural resource-based economy, Canada is a boom and bust kind of place. This year, the country has enjoyed a significant boom. Thanks to a government stimulus program, rising corporate capital expenditures and consumer spending, Canada’s GDP growth has been nothing short of spectacular in 2017. According to Statistics Canada, the latest reading for year-over-year GDP growth is a healthy 3.5% (as of August 2017). While this is stronger than all major developed countries, growth is decelerating from its most recent peak in May 2017 (when GDP growth was an astounding 4.7%). A visual overview of historical GDP growth is shown below for reference:


Turning a corner: Canadian growth comes back down to earth


11-17-2017 CAD GDP growth


Source: Statistics Canada


Following the crude oil bust in the second quarter of 2014, Canadian growth rates cratered. While the country avoided a technical recession, the economic outlook was poor until early 2016. After crude oil returned to a bull market in the first quarter of 2016, the fortunes of the country turned. Given limited growth in 2015, the economy had no problem delivering 2%+ year-over-year growth rates in 2016. As a substantial stimulus program ramped up government spending in 2017, growth rates have continued to accelerate this year.


Storm clouds on the horizon: crude oil and real estate


While Canada has delivered exceptional growth in the last two years, the future outlook is much more challenging. Beyond the issue of base effects (mathematically, year-over-year GDP growth will be much tougher next year), key sectors including the oil & gas industry and Canadian real estate look ripe for a downturn.


Crude bull market intact today, but at risk in 2018


As WTI crude strengthens beyond $55, crude oil is clearly in a bull market today. Looking at figures from the International Energy Agency, global demand growth continues to run ahead of supply growth. Thus the ongoing bull market is supported by fundamentals. Thanks to the impact of hurricanes and infrastructure bottlenecks in 2017, US shale hasn’t entirely fulfilled its role as the global ‘swing producer’ this year. The dynamics of supply growth versus demand growth are shown below:


Who invited American shale? US supply ruins the crude oil party


10-13-2017 crude oil supply demand


Source: International Energy Agency, forward OPEC supply estimates via US EIA


Unfortunately, the status quo looks set to change as US supply returns with a vengeance. According to estimates from the IEA, supply growth will outstrip demand growth in the first quarter of 2018. Digging deeper into supply estimates, US shale is once again to blame. Our view is that this changing dynamic will lead to a new bear market in crude oil. Looking back at recent history, crude prices formed a long-term top in the second quarter of 2014 once supply growth overtook demand. Similarly, crude prices bottomed in the first quarter of 2016 once supply growth fell below demand in early 2016. Given Canada"s dependence on crude oil exports, a bear market for the commodity is likely to result in a weaker currency.


As China enters its latest real estate downturn, Canada not far behind


While Canadian real estate has enjoyed a great year, the future outlook is much tougher. Similar to its peers in Australia and New Zealand, Canadian real estate prices tend to lag real estate prices in China. This is both because Canada’s economy is deeply intertwined with China, and because the country is a big destination for overseas investment from China. While overseas investors make up a relatively small portion of buyers (around 5% according to government estimates), they serve an important role by acting as the marginal buyer for prime property. A comparison of new house prices in China versus Canada is shown below for reference:


Canadian real estate boom set to run out of steam


11-17-2017 China Canada real estate


Source: Statistics Canada, China National Bureau of Statistics


As Chinese new house prices accelerated significantly in early 2015, Canadian real estate prices followed in 2016. As the Chinese market is now decelerating, negative growth appears to be on the horizon. In March 2015, Chinese house price growth bottomed at -6.1%. While the Canadian bull market continues for now (September new house prices registered at 3.8%), a downturn is likely over the next 6-12 months. As real estate makes up 13% of Canadian GDP, a significant decline in the fortunes of the industry are likely to spill over to the broader economy.


Implications for the Canadian dollar


At the beginning of the year, the Canadian dollar enjoyed a wide number of bullish catalysts including accelerating GDP growth, rising rate hike expectations, a relatively strong crude oil market and speculator sentiment that was at a bearish extreme. These catalysts, and the Bank of Canada’s actions in particular, helped the currency strengthen until late September.


Today, almost every factor that drives the Canadian dollar is working against it. Future GDP growth rates are set to keep decelerating. Looking at the Bank of Canada, its outlook for future rate hikes is now “cautious”. This is a big change from its hawkish tilt earlier this year. While speculator sentiment is no longer at bullish extremes, waning interest in the Canadian dollar is weighing on the currency. The ongoing NAFTA negotiations are another source of potential political risk. Finally, an impending downturn for both crude oil and Canadian real estate further worsen the picture. Thus, our longer term outlook on the Canadian dollar is bearish.



 









Monday, November 6, 2017

The Central Bank Bubble: How Will It Burst?

Alberto Gallo of Algebris Investments steps up to take his shot at the $64,000 (more like trillion) question in a report published this week “The Central Bank Bubble: How Will It Burst?”


Gallo manages the Algebris Macro Credit Fund described as “an unconstrained strategy investing across global bond and credit markets, and with lead responsibility for Macro Strategies” on the company’s website.



Gallo sets the scene as follows.


Most investors are still playing the game, and in the same direction. We estimate there are currently around $11tn in negative-yielding bonds and over $2tn in strategies that explicitly or implicitly depend on stable volatility and asset correlations. If low interest rates and QE have been the lever pushing up prices of dividend and coupon-paying assets, central banks are the fulcrum.


This fulcrum is slowly shifting: the ECB has just announced a reduction in its bond purchase programme, the Bank of England is likely to hike this month – even in the face of economic weakness –the Fed will likely hike rates again in December, and the PBoC has recently warned of asset overvaluation.


One of our favourite parts of the report is “The Magic Money Tree” infographic which explains how QE has benefited a plethora of investment strategies and created the current bubble to end all bubbles.



Now Gallo is obviously savvy because he doesn’t nail his colours to the mast on one factor which will prick the central bank bubble. Instead he offers four scenarios. The first threat is a rise in inflation, which he summarises as follows.


1. Inflation: after nine years of low-flation, the probability of a sudden rise in inflation is increasing, as job markets get tighter, globalisation leaves way to protectionist policies and liquidity reaches job-creating small and medium businesses as banks re-start lending.


Wage inflation aside, Gallo believes China could continue to export inflation based on a more resilient than expected Chinese economy. Gallo believes that China may have sufficient policy options to smoothly deflate its credit bubble. While we might disagree, it is a possibility.


The second threat to the central bank bubble is…central bankers.


2. Central bankers themselves: central banks appear to have shifted their tone to worry increasingly about financial stability. There are good reasons to do so. We are many years into a global synchronous expansion, and there will be little monetary policy ammunition to fight a new slowdown, with interest rates near record lows and $20tn in global central bank balance sheets. In some countries, like Japan and Switzerland, central banks have grown their balance sheets to sizes similar to their respective economies. The good news is some central banks are trying to curb stimulus before their mandate ends. The Federal Reserve is poised to raise rates again in December, the Bank of England will likely hike, the ECB has announced a reduction in purchases and the Bank of Canada has hiked too. The bad news is that markets have so far largely ignored this reduction in stimulus.


It makes sense…central banks created the bubble via QE and ZIRP/NIRP, so reversing that strategy might prick their own bubble.


The third threat is another merry band of miscreants.


3. Politicians: central bank QE has not only lowered yields and boosted asset prices. It has also artificially suppressed volatility. Yet volatility may come back as the consequences of rising inequality in the distribution of wealth, opportunity and natural resources across the world. The last decade has been great for billionaires, not so good for Main Street. Inequality of wealth and opportunity in developed economies has fuelled anti-establishment protest votes like the ones for Brexit or President Trump. Other populist parties are on the rise in Continental Europe and Scandinavia. In turn, domestic populism and nationalism in developed countries can increase commercial conflict and protectionism - see for instance the potential withdrawal from NAFTA, or the EU-UK tariff threat - as well as exacerbate militarism and geopolitical conflict. Populism has historically fuelled government spending and fiscal stimulus, higher taxes and aggressive redistribution policies, which could all re-price overvalued assets and/or target assets used as a store of value. 


We have nothing to add.


4. The market: rising growth, low inflation and low interest rates have proven a boon to global markets. There are now $20tn in central bank assets globally, and around 10% of global sovereign debt is yielding negative. Investors have been buying equities for yield and bonds for capital gains, and have been selling volatility explicitly or positioned in strategies that are implicitly short volatility. These assume a stable volatility and correlation among the price of assets. For example, risk-parity strategies assume a negative correlation between risky assets, like stocks, and "risk-free assets", like U.S. treasuries. But what happens if both decline together, and short volatility investors become forced to unwind their portfolios?


Exactly, this is what we’re waiting for, but what is the catalyst? Nobody knows.


If we were forced to guess what will prick the bubble, we would probably place more emphasis on China than the Algebris report does. However, putting aside what causes it, we share Gallo’s view on some of the key mechanics which will be “in play” when a crisis unfolds.


What will the next crisis look like?


The over $2tn in explicit and implicit short-volatility strategies could be the spark, similar to sub-prime for credit markets in 2008, which was $1.4tn. However, a future crisis would be very different from 2008. Growth in passive investing vehicles and in the mismatch between assets they buy and liabilities they issue, lack of risk-free assets and growing collateral chains, diminishing trading liquidity due to higher capital requirements for dealers point to more fragility in financial markets.


It"s perfectly set up, if we only knew when.


*  *  *


Full report below...










Monday, October 23, 2017

It"s Time To Take Central Bankers" "Calm Assurances" With A Pinch Of Salt

"It could be time to fire up your engines," suggests former fund manager Richard Breslow, urging some life back into the seemingly oblivious markets...



Via Bloomberg,


There’s a lot of uncertainty out there and the response to it shouldn’t be an inability to trade. How about a little frenetic back and forth?


We could use some of the good kind of noise, as in, let’s show a little life. Markets are inching toward some really interesting levels and it’s time for them to show a little spirit and giddy up.


For once, try taking central bankers at their word that tapering and, eventually, rates, are on the move. And take all of these blithe assurances that everything during the process will be calm, cool and collected with a grain of salt. We need to stop saying global economic growth and trade are showing meaningful strength and then agree that everything is still horrible and we can’t afford to change.


 



 


Do you know why there’s no inflation? We measure it incorrectly. I can assure you it’s more expensive to live than it used to be. Which is the simplest and truest definition. Why isn’t wage growth higher? Because we’ve utterly skewed the relative bargaining power between capital and labor. Monetary policy will never be able to fix that. Nor the masses forever soothed by rolling out another reality show.


 


No matter who is selected as the next Fed Chair, rates are likely going up in December and will be in play for March. Tapering is beginning. The BOE is looking to pull back some stimulus and the ECB wants to as well. Even the BOJ has begun to include warnings about investor complacency in their comments. Yesterday’s Japanese election may seem like a strong endorsement of the status quo, but it has also changed the underlying discussion on a number of topics in a meaningful way. The Bank of Canada may be on pause, but they are among a number of banks waiting to pull the switch.


 


At whatever point along the Treasury yield curve you look, the charts suggest we have crept up to important pivot points. And it’s going to be even more apparent if the recent mini bounce in its steepness can generate some momentum. What a difference it will feel like if the 10-year can break above 2.40%. Not a big ask given we sit so close below. Yet, if it was so easy, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. Twos and fives are right where they will have to decide whether to fish or cut bait. Where they go from here matters. And if I wanted to be a starry-eyed optimist, I’d point out that while it remains low, option volatility has traced out a nice floor since July and has been trying to push higher in the last week.


 



 


The dollar, too, is showing some signs of life, even though the majors continue to see volatility selling. The dollar index traded at 94 this morning and if it can eke out another half-percent, there’s going to be a different narrative circulated.


 



 


Which countries’ set of woes will take center stage? Or to put it another way, how much of whose bad news is already priced into prevailing levels?



As Brewslow concludes, "I hope this all leads to something interesting... Because who wants to sit around watching the paint dry some more."


In any case, at these prices, you definitely have something well worth watching. Volatility pricing can be backward looking as well as prescriptive.









Wednesday, September 27, 2017

Loonie Loses All 'Surprise Rate Hike' Gains As Canada's Poloz Gets Cold Feet

The Canadian Dollar is tumbling - erasing all the gains following September"s surprise rate-hike - as in his first speech since the, Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz warns there is no “predetermined path for interest rates” and said the central bank will proceed “cautiously” as it assess the performance of the economy from here on.





“Monetary policy will be particularly data dependent in these circumstances and, as always, we could still be surprised in either direction. We will continue to feel our way cautiously as we get closer to home”



“The appropriate path for interest rates in this situation is very difficult to know, because there are a number of unknowns around the inflation outlook”



“We will not be mechanical in our approach to monetary policy”



And on that the Loonie is tumbling...



As Bloomberg notes, Poloz is seeking to balance bringing interest rates back to more normal levels amid the strongest growth spurt in more than a decade, while at the same time not harming the fledgling recovery. Wednesday"s speech -- like one given by Deputy Governor Tim Lane last week -- may be interpreted as a further attempt by policy makers to pare expectations that the central bank is moving headlong into more rate increases, after hiking borrowing costs twice since July.

Thursday, September 21, 2017

The Real Threat Remains - Brandon Smith Warns "Do Not Be Fooled By The Fed's Magic Show"

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,


I remember back in mid-2013 when the Federal Reserve fielded the notion of a "taper" of quantitative easing measures. More specifically, I remember the response of mainstream economic analysts as well as the alternative economic community. I argued fervently in multiple articles that the Fed would indeed follow through with the taper, and that it made perfect sense for them to do so given that the mission of the central bank is not to protect the U.S. financial system, but to sabotage it carefully and deliberately. The general consensus was that a taper of QE was impossible and that the Fed would "never dare." Not long after, the Fed launched its taper program.



Two years later, in 2015, I argued once again that the Fed would begin raising interest rates even though multiple mainstream and alternative sources believed that this was also impossible. Without low interest rates, stock buybacks would slowly but surely die out, and the last pillar holding together equities and the general economy (besides blind faith) would be removed. The idea that the Fed would knowingly take such an action seemed to be against their "best self interest;" and yet, not long after, they initiated the beginning of the end for artificially low interest rates.


The process that the Federal Reserve has undertaken has been a long and arduous one cloaked in disinformation. It is a process of dismantlement. Through unprecedented stimulus measures, the central bank has conjured perhaps the largest stock and bond bubbles in history, not to mention a bubble to end all bubbles in the U.S. dollar.


Stocks in particular are irrelevant in the grand scheme of our economy, but this does not stop the populace from using them as a reference point for the health of our system. This creates an environment rife with delusion, just as the open flood of cheap credit created considerable delusion before the crash of 2008.


Today, we find our economic fundamentals in complete disarray, but the overwhelming fantasy within stocks still remains. Why? Because yet again, for some reason, no one is ready to accept the reality that the Fed is pulling the plug on America"s fiscal life support. Nary a handful of economists in the world think that the Fed will raise interest rates one more time this year if ever again, and the threat of a balance sheet reduction is the furthest thing from everyone"s mind. Daytrading investors are utterly convinced they have the Fed by the short hairs. I say, the situation is actually in reverse.


The minutes from the Fed"s July Open Market Committee Meeting indicate that while the central bank has been the savior of stock investors for several years, the party is about to end. Comments on the risks a bull market might pose to "financial stability" have been more frequent the past couple of months


Only a few weeks ago, former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan commented that bond markets could collapse and bring stocks down with them do to overvaluations and increasing interest rates.


Recent spikes in markets despite a steady stream of natural disasters, threats of war with North Korea, as well as "increased inflation" (according to Fed models) due to the damage wrought by Hurricane Harvey suggest that the Fed will indeed continue hiking rates into our ongoing financial collapse.


The next FOMC meeting will conclude on the 20th of this month, and the question is, will the Fed surprise with a rate hike and/or balance sheet reduction program? I believe the odds are much higher than many people seem to think. [ZH: we now know that The Fed did announce the start of the balance sheet reduction program as Brandon forecast]


First, let"s be clear, historically the Fed"s predictable behavior has been to skip major policy actions in September and then startle markets with renewed and aggressive actions in December. People placing bets on a Fed rate hike in September would look at this pattern and say "no way." However, the narrative I see building in Fed rhetoric and in the mainstream media is that stock markets have become "unruly children" and that the Fed must become a "stern parent," reigning them in before they are crushed under the weight of their own naive enthusiasm.


In my view, the Fed will continue to do what it says it is going to do — raise interest rates and reduce and remove stimulus, and that the mainstream narrative will soon be adjusted to suggest that this is "necessary;" that stock markets need a bit of tough love.


If the Fed means to follow through with its stated plans for "financial stability" in markets, then the only measure that would be effective in shell-shocking stocks back to reality would be a surprise hike, a surprise announcement of balance sheet reduction or both at the same time.


If the Fed intends to continue cutting off life support to equities and bonds in preparation for a controlled demolition of the U.S. economy, then there is a high probability at the very least of a balance sheet reduction announcement this week with strong language indicating another rate hike in December. I also would not completely rule out a surprise rate hike even though September is usually a no-action month for central banks.


This would fit the trend of central banks around the globe strategically distancing themselves from artificial support for the financial structure. Last week, the Bank of England surprised investors with an open indication that they may begin raising interest rates "in the coming months." The Bank Of Canada surprised some economists with yet another rate hike this month and mentions of "more to come." The European Central Bank has paved the way for a tapering of stimulus measures according to comments made during its latest meeting early this month. And, the Bank of Japan initiated taper measures in July.


Even Forbes is admitting that there appears to be a "coordinated tightening of monetary policy" coming far sooner than the mainstream expects. If you understand how the Bank for International Settlements controls policy initiatives of national central bank members, then you should not be surprised that central banks all over the world are pursuing the same actions and the same rhetoric. The only difference between any of them is the pace they have chosen in taking the punch bowl away from the party.


The point is, when it comes to the fiat peddlers, there are indeed a few sure things, but continued stimulus is not one of them. One thing that is certain is that they will act in concert as they are clearly doing now in terms of policy tightening. Another thing that is certain is that if they plant a notion in the mainstream media — such as the notion that they are "worried about overvaluations in stocks" and that interest rates must rise, then they will follow through as they always have. Perhaps not at the pace the mainstream expects, or the pace I expect, but certainly somewhere in-between.


Finally, it behooves me to mention again that the Fed has done all of this before. In the lead up to the stock market crash of 1929, the central bank bloated stocks with easy credit measures and low interest rates, only to hike rates in the name of "quelling inflation." This hacked the legs out from under markets with a machete, and the rest is history. The hidden purpose behind this tactic is extraordinary centralization on a global scale. The Fed is not interested in the health of the U.S. economy, it is interested in total globalization of all economies under one totalitarian umbrella. To make an omelet, you have to break a few eggs.


Of course, the Fed will not engineer a market crash in a vacuum. It is my suspicion that the next Fed meeting will be followed by a geopolitical distraction — the most likely candidate being increasing conflict with North Korea.


Do not be fooled by the magic show. The real threat to us all is the central banking and international banking apparatus, including the BIS and the IMF. From now until the end of this year, remain vigilant.

Saturday, September 16, 2017

Stossel slams BOC Alt-Media ban: "Be nice or we kick you out."

Contributed by Sprott Money


Original available here:



Stossel, Moen Weigh In on Bank of Canada Free Market Economist, Alt-media Ban - Peter Diekmeyer


September 15, 2017



Criticism continues to mount in the wake of the Bank of Canada’s exclusion of free market
economists and the two-tier media strategy it implemented for a key policy-making conference, held yesterday in Ottawa.


The conference’s goal was to air out preliminary issues related to the BOC’s inflation-control
agreement with the Canadian government, which is renewed every five years.


Canada’s monetary policy politburo, which, through its interest rate policies, sets or influences
prices throughout the economy, is currently reflecting on how much more it
will ask ordinary Canadians to pay for their food, clothing and shelter during
the coming years.


Stossel: the establishment protects itself


However, there were few ordinary Canadians to be seen at the BOC workshop, which was essentially paneled
by bureaucrats, university professors and other government-financed officials.


“The establishment protects itself,” said John Stossel, a Fox News contributor, who was in town to address the
Montreal Economics Institute about the perils of central planning.
“People have become comfortable with the idea of a few old men setting public
policy in a back room.”


The long-time investigative journalist, author and consumer activist, who has followed
government closely for decades, was more nuanced regarding the Bank of Canada’s
ban on alternative media.


“I can understand their reasoning,” said Stossel. “You can’t really have a rabble disturbing things.”


BOC to MSM: be nice or we will kick you out


Stossel was more concerned about the message the BOC ban sends to mainstream media, such as the
Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg News, who were given preferential
access to the policy event.


“That’s a club that all governments have,” said Stossel, who recently began contributing to
Reason TV, a US-based free markets
web-cast. “It’s “be nice or we will kick you out.” The White House does that
too.”


Tim Moen, leader of the Libertarian Party of Canada, also broke his silence on the issue by
issuing a strong condemnation.


“The Bank of Canada is suffering from a real lack of free market input,” Moen wrote on a party-affiliated social media page. “It"s probably naive to imagine an institution charged with centrally planned
money creation would want input from critics.”




A perfect time to look “outside the box”


Surprisingly, one of the most obvious free market voices that the Bank of Canada ignored during
its consultation process came to the central bank’s defence.


“The reality is that most top monetary policy experts already work at central banks or at
university research departments that accept their ideas,” said David Howden, academic vice-president at the Mises Institute of Canada, and author of numerous papers dealing with monetary policy from a free markets
perspective.


“The bad news is that central banks are forced to refer to the same specialists over and over
again,” said Howden, who is currently working on a paper dealing with central
bank balance sheet analysis. “The fact that the current process is a multi-year
reflection makes it especially important that they consult outside opinions and
not rely on the presumption that the current framework is OK.”


Howden cited George Bragues, a professor at the University of Guelph-Humber, as one
example of an “outside the box” thinker who the BOC might have consulted.


A return to a gold standard?


Ironically, Stossel, who admits to not being a monetary expert nor an expert on Canada, has
offered interesting advice on the subject in the past.


“(Americans) should learn from Canada,” he wrote back in 2013. “The Canadians had no central bank when the Great Depression began, just
private banks issuing currency backed by gold. During the 1930s, not even one
Canadian bank failed. Thousands failed in the U.S.”


Stossel, who during his many years at ABC was regarded as one of America’s top
reporters, may be right. But a cursory glance suggests that they don’t make Canadians like they used to.


They don’t make economists the way they used to either.

Friday, September 8, 2017

Toronto Home Price Bubble Bursts Into Bear Market

Authored by Wolf Richter via WolfStreet.com,


With surprise rate hike, Bank of Canada turns against housing market...


Home sales in the Greater Toronto Area, the largest housing market in Canada, plunged 34.8% in August compared to a year ago, to 6,357 homes, with sales of detached homes and semi-detached homes getting eviscerated:


Sales by type:


  • Detached houses -41.6%

  • Semi-detached houses -37.3%

  • Townhouses -27.5%:

  • Condos -28.0%.

Even as total sales plunged, the number of active listings of homes for sale soared 65% year-over-year to 16,419, with 11,523 new listings added in August, according to the Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB).


“The relationship between sales [plunging] and listings in the marketplace today [soaring] suggests a balanced market,” the report explained, adding hopefully:





“If current conditions are sustained over the coming months, we would expect to see year-over-year price growth normalize slightly above the rate of inflation. However, if some buyers move from the sidelines back into the marketplace, as TREB consumer research suggests may happen, an acceleration in price growth could result if listings remain at current levels.”



And the average price of all homes, at C$732,292 in August, plunged 20.5% from the crazy peak in April (C$920,761). By this measure, it has now entered a bear market.


The average price in April had shot up 30% year-over-year.


To cool this nutty business, the Ontario government introduced a laundry list of measures on April 20. It included most prominently a 15% transfer tax on nonresident foreign speculators. That appears to have done the trick.


Given the enormous price gains in recent years, the market remains hyper-inflated, and the four-month downturn into a bear market hasn’t even brought prices back to the year-ago level, with the average price for all types of housing up 3%, and the condo price up 21.4% year-over-year.


To cool a similarly nutty housing bubble in Vancouver, the government of British Columbia had passed a year ago similar legislation with a 15% nonresident foreign speculator tax. But worried about an outright implosion of the bubble, it has since been subsidizing with taxpayer money down-payments aimed at first-time buyers and condos, which has inflated the condo bubble and condo speculation to new heights.


Politicians – they’re desperately dependent on extracting property taxes from homeowners – don’t want the world’s most majestic housing bubble to implode. They just want it to remain stable so that taxes can be extracted from willing homeowners that have gotten rich off years of house-price inflation. But for now, the Ontario government is letting the market ride.


The TREB report said that the sharp drop in average prices “points to fewer high-end home sales this year compared to last.” So are speculators with the most money abandoning the market?


Even the Bank of Canada has been warning home buyers – particularly speculators – all year long about big potential losses. Then in July, it raised its target for the overnight rate by 0.25 percentage points. Another rate hike was expected in December, to match the Fed’s presumed rate hike.


But today, in a surprise move, it raised rates again by 0.25 percentage points, to 1% – and there are now expectations that it might raise its target rate a third time later this year. In response, the loonie jumped 1.3% against the US dollar this morning.


These rate hikes “would just further dampen” the housing market, explained Bank of Montreal chief economist Doug Porter, adding that the surprise increase so soon after July’s rate hike “accentuates” the Bank of Canada’s urgency to raise rates.





“So I wouldn’t brush it off – I think that will put a bit more upward pressure on some of the medium and longer-term mortgage rates as well, and of course the variable rates will move almost instantaneously,” he said.



Variable-rate mortgages account for about 30% of all mortgages in Canada. So these rates ticked up after the July hike; they will after this hike; and if there’s another hike later this year, they’ll tick up again. A 0.75 percentage points increase in the interest rate on a C$800,000 mortgage would raise the annual interest costs by C$6,000.


Homeowners with variable-rate mortgages will now have to come up with more money to pay for their homes. And potential homebuyers are looking at steeper costs – something they will likely keep in mind, now that easy price gains may no longer be so easy, and that the Bank of Canada, rather than just warning about it, is actively working to deflate the housing bubble.


And the housing bubble in the US? Read… The US Cities with the Biggest Housing Bubbles

The Trump 'Eclipse Bottom'

Authored by Kevin Muir via The Macro Tourist blog,


Last night the US stock market sold off on headlines that Trump had taken Gary Cohn’s name out of the running for the next Fed Chairman.


https://www.thefringenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/themacrotourist.comGarySep0717-e13164cace189fcda9c00f13029006d930d3e6fd.png


From CNBC:





A senior administration official told CNBC that Trump is considering several candidates for Fed chair.






CNN reporter Jake Tapper tweeted that a source close to the White House told him that Cohn is “more likely to get electric chair than Fed Chair.”



I have been skeptical that Trump would give the nod to Gary. First of all, he’s a Democrat. Secondly, he’s got squid stench all over him. But most importantly, he ain’t going to do what Trump wants. Gary is way too much of his own man to appeal to Trump. Trump wants an Arthur Burns character that can be bossed around like Nixon did. No, Gary will stick around with the administration for his full year so he will be eligible for the tax deferral deal on his Goldman stock, and then he will quietly split.


And the prediction markets have correctly taken Cohn’s chances for Fed Chair down to almost 10%.


https://www.thefringenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/themacrotourist.comCohnSep0717-c7874bc1878ba22ca1e4c17b5cf130115a9c85a0.png


But many pundits believe eliminating Cohn somehow increases Yellen’s chances.


https://www.thefringenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/themacrotourist.comFedSep0717-c85f407c2b2137e222da8225ec266b2a87eb6f4e.png


Yellen upticked on the news, but that’s also a pipe dream. Yellen doesn’t want the job, nor does Trump want Yellen.


No, Yellen will follow her Vice Chairman, Stanley Fischer’s lead, who abruptly resigned yesterday for “personal reasons.”


All of a sudden, Trump can pick more board members than anytime before the Fed was conceived in 1913.


Today, Kevin Warsh is one of the leading contenders. When I was discussing this development with the always entertaining Mark Spiegel, I expressed my view that Kevin Warsh was far too hawkish for Trump. To which Mark replied, “but Trump might not realize what Warsh really means until it is too late…” Yup, I can always count on Mark to make me smile. There is definitely a chance that Trump doesn’t bother to take the time to understand the implications of nominating Warsh, but I think the odds are slim.


Trump is the King of Debt. If there is one thing he is good at - it’s debt. And let’s not forget his comments about renegotiating the Federal debt. Obviously he can’t default like he did when he was a real estate developer, but he can do what governments throughout the ages have always done - inflate their way out.


Market strategists who toss around names for a new Fed Chair like Warsh and Taylor, both of who are now academics, are completely missing the boat. Trump will surprise us with the most unorthodox, easy money, lunatic you could ever dream up. The only conventional candidate that stands a chance is Neel Kashkari. He is currently on the FOMC board, is a Republican, and most importantly, is a huge dove. If not Chair, could he maybe take over as Vice Chairman when Fischer leaves?


Regardless of the exact composition of the FOMC, the correct bet is to assume it will become significantly easier in the years to come. I guess to some extent the market has already figured this out. Over the past month, gold has exploded higher and the US dollar sold off hard. I suspect it might be only the beginning.


*  *  *


Today the market is panicking and bidding up fixed income across the board on news that ECB Chairman, Mario Draghi, was not prepared to announce the start of their tapering. And the reason for his reluctance to commence winding down Quantitative Easing? Inflation had not hit his target.


My favourite part? Mario said in no uncertain terms:





“NOTHING WILL DERAIL THE ECB’S WILL TO DELIVER INFLATION”



The head of a Central Bank says that come hell or high water, he will deliver inflation of 2%, so what do investors do? They buy long dated German bunds yielding 30 basis points, locking in a real loss of 170 basis points if he achieves his goal. Yeah, makes complete sense.


*  *  *


I had to laugh this morning when Eurasia Group’s Ian Bremmer tweeted the following:


https://www.thefringenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/themacrotourist.comIanSep0717-def2aaa7de69a18b71cd78a198b5ee7f316b62a6.png


I can’t say I disagree. Trump seems to be sticking his foot in his mouth a lot less often these days.


And with the recent debt ceiling deal with the Democrats, you could almost say he is acting Presidential.


Dave Lutz, from JonesTrading, had a great observation regarding this change:





“…we could be on the cusp of a sea change here in D.C. Ryan and the Tea / Freedom Party shoved out of the picture, while Trump shows his true stripes and embraces the middle ground. If he’s cutting deals with the Dem leadership - he doesn’t need any of those cats. I wouldn’t short Trump at these prices.”



I couldn’t agree more. I think Trump staring at the Solar eclipse was the bottom for his Presidency.


https://www.thefringenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/themacrotourist.comEclipseSep0717-5ef7eec584172676b588830a9e77fbb5865b169b.png


After that bonehead move, it’s all uphill. Seriously, there is so little expected of him, he is bound to outperform.


And if that is indeed the case, have a look at this chart of Trump’s approval rating versus US 10 year yields.



I lagged the yield series by a couple of weeks, and I suspect that Trump’s recent performance might help slow down this bond rally.


Right now it seems like nothing can stop this bond move, but remember the market always looks best at the top. I still see all sorts of reasons to be skeptical of this squeeze into fixed income.


*  *  *


Finally, I will write about this in a little more detail in the coming days, but I wanted to quickly review a potential trade for those who think Bank of Canada Governor Poloz just pulled a Trichet, and double hiked into a slowdown.


https://www.thefringenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/themacrotourist.comEDM9Sep0717-c5f7a192cf78c520a9b78b01525d9d11704d7bf4.png


Earlier in the year, the difference between the front end of the US and Canadian money market curves had more than 3 more relative tightenings priced in for the US out to June 2019. With the recent flattening of the US curve, and the surprise hike by the Bank of Canada, this spread has spiked to a point where Canada is now priced to have 1.5 more tightenings than the US.


No way the highly levered Canadian economy can handle the increased rates and the massive strength of the Loonie.


I am buying June 2019 BAX’s and shorting the equivalent Eurodollar contract. I expect these two contracts to converge back to zero in the coming months.

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Is Canada Really "In Serious Trouble": Goldman Responds

One week after we channeled Deutsche Bank"s Torsten Slok, who two years ago warned that "Canada is in serious trouble", a warning which was especially resonant after last week"s rate hike by the Bank of Canada - the first since 2010 -  which we argued threatens to burst Canada"s gargantuan housing bubble...



... resulting in dramatic negative consequences for Canada"s construction-heavy economy...



... Goldman has released a report titled "Does Canada 2017 = US 2007?" seeking to answer whether Canada"s economy is indeed on the verge of a housing bubble burst and which - considering it was the most read piece on GS360 this morning - touches on a question many investors the seeking the answers, especially after the IMF echoed our concerns last Thursday, when it issued a report in which it warned about the "danger of a sharp correction in the housing market."


By way of background, Goldman notes the following:





"nominal home prices in Canada have grown by 13% over the past year, and by 200% since 2000. These sharp increases in home prices in Canada have invited comparisons with the US housing market in the period leading up to the Global Financial Crisis (Exhibit 1). A large downturn in the Canadian housing market in 2017 would seem particularly untimely given the likelihood of rising mortgage rates in Canada. Most Canadian mortgages have 25-year amortization schedules but 5-year terms, and so borrowers typically have to re-qualify for new mortgages every 5 years. Under our rates view, many Canadian mortgage borrowers may be forced in the coming years to refinance their loans at higher mortgage rates.



To frame Goldman"s take, the bank"s housing strategist Marty Young writes that "given the potential risks that a housing downturn could pose to the Canadian economy, we address here the questions (1) “is Canada’s housing market in 2017 comparable to the US’s in 2007?”, and (2) “will rising interest rates lead to significant payment shocks and mortgage defaults among Canadian homeowners?”.


Young"s answer to the first question is as follows:





Our answer is “in some respects, Canada in 2017 and US in 2007 are similar, but in many respects they are not”. One important difference is with respect to the mortgage lending standards prevailing in the two times and places. Exhibit 2 charts an indicator of US lending standards vs. the US house price index, showing that standards were still loosening during 2005-2007 even as house prices were approaching a peak. In 2006, over 40% of US mortgages were funded via the non-agency RMBS market, where no-doc and low-doc lending and usage of “exotic” loan products such as negatively amortizing adjustable rate mortgages  were most common.





By comparison, Canadian banking regulators have generally tightened lending standards since the financial crisis, including reducing maximum LTV ratios and amortization terms, and, more recently, Vancouver and Toronto have introduced foreign buyer taxes to dampen house price growth... Canada’s mortgage delinquency rates have remained structurally lower than the delinquency rates in the US for the past several decades (Exhibit 3). These lower delinquency rates reflect a combination of more conservative underwriting and more lender-friendly mortgage foreclosure laws in Canada. The lower baseline mortgage default rates in Canada, combined with stronger bank capitalization, suggest that a house price decline in Canada of the magnitude experienced in the US during 2007-2011 would likely pose smaller systemic risks than were realised in the US during the financial crisis period.



Another argument from Goldman: household mortgage debt service ratios remain low.





Exhibit 3 shows that delinquency rates in the US had already started trending up by 2007, whereas delinquency rates in Canada remain low, suggesting that Canada’s mortgage market is at least not yet at the same distressed stage as the US’s was in 2007. Similarly, Exhibit 4 shows that the mortgage debt service ratio in US was historically elevated by 2007, whereas the comparable ratio in Canada remains near historically normal levels. Rental vacancy rates and unsold housing inventories are among the other indicators that were already showing stress in the US by 2007, but which still appear healthy in Canada as of 2017.





To this, however, once can simply respond that while mortgage debt service ratios remain low, simply due to sticky low rates, total Canadian household debt service is substantially higher than in the US:



Putting the above together, Goldman says that while a Canadian housing bubble burst would be bad, it would not be quite as bad as what happened in the US a decade ago.


As for the second question, will rising rates leads to payment shocks and a spike in mortgage defaults, here Goldman is less sanguine, even if it contends that the outcome would not be "disastrous":





Whereas backward-looking indicators of the Canada housing market may still appear relatively benign, market observers have expressed concern that rising interest rates will lead to significant stress, since most Canadian mortgages have only 5-year terms and thus will need to be refinanced at higher rates. Our calculations suggest that this risk, while non-negligible, may not be disastrous. As an example, a borrower who took out a 25-year amortization, 5-year term, 4% mortgage for $300K in 2013 would have been paying a monthly principal plus interest payment of $1,584. If this borrower is forced to refinance the remaining $262K balance in 2018 at a higher 6% rate – a fairly extreme scenario – and takes another 25-year amortization loan, the monthly payment would increase to $1,688, just a 7% increase relative to the original loan payment.


...


The payment increase is relatively modest because (a) the rising interest rate leads to a higher interest payment but also to a smaller monthly principal payment; and (b) the original 2013 loan was scheduled to fully amortize by 2038, but the new 2018 mortgage is not scheduled to pay down until 2043. By extending the final amortization date, the payment shock is partly mitigated. We thus do not expect a large pickup in mortgage defaults due to higher payment burdens among existing borrowers.



So while the modest - for now - rate increase won"t lead to a payment "shock", and induce a surge of defaults among existing borrowers, Goldman admits that "higher rates can negatively affect housing affordability for future potential homebuyers" adding that "our previous research in the US and other international housing markets has suggested that if higher rates are associated with a strengthening economy or stronger inflation, then the overall impact on house prices can be limited, but if higher rates are driven by an adverse policy shock, the impact may be more negative."


Considering that Canadian hourly wages have plunged in recent months, it is difficult to make the case that the BOC"s rate hike was warranted, and may indeed by interpreted as an "adverse policy shock"



Goldman tries to spin the reality, suggesting that "In the case of Canada, we expect rising rates to be correlated with a stronger labor market, and thus expect the negative impact on housing affordability to be real but manageable." That said, this "stronger labor market", at least in the form of rising wages, has yet to emerge.


Goldman"s summary:





The recent rapid rise in house prices in Canada presents a risk of eventual over-heating. A model of bust risk that accounts for house price-to-rent ratios, past changes in real house prices, investment-to-GDP ratios, real GDP growth and inflation puts the probability of a 5% or larger downturn in real house prices over the next 5-8 quarters at around 30%. At the same time, we see significant differences between the US housing market in 2007 and the Canadian market in 2017, and for this reason we think it may be early to look for a downturn in Canadian house prices of close to the magnitude seen in the US before the financial crisis.



It was not immediately clear if it is "early to look for a downturn" because of Goldman"s infamous, chronic sellside overoptimism about, well, everything (recall the bank had initially forecast US GDP would grow just shy of 3% by the end of 2018, and now a 2% print appears optimistic), or because Goldman needs some more time to put on Canadian housing shorts for its prop group and its best clients.