Showing posts with label Anthony Scaramucci. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anthony Scaramucci. Show all posts

Thursday, August 17, 2017

Bannon Breaks Silence: Slams "Far-Right Clowns", Vows "Economic War With China"

After weeks of speculation about his future, Trump White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon has broken free of his self-imposed exile, unloading a torrent of Scaramucci-esque comments to none other than Robert Kuttner - the editor of The American Prospect, a progressive publication (the cover lines on whose first two issues after Trump’s election were “Resisting Trump” and “Containing Trump."


Kuttner sets the surprising scene...





Trump’s embattled strategist phones me, unbidden, to opine on China, Korea, and his enemies in the administration...



Needless to say, I was a little stunned to get an email from Bannon’s assistant midday Tuesday, just as all hell was breaking loose once again about Charlottesville, saying that Bannon wished to meet with me.



But unload Bannon did:


He began with China...





“We’re at economic war with China,” he added. “It’s in all their literature. They’re not shy about saying what they’re doing. One of us is going to be a hegemon in 25 or 30 years and it’s gonna be them if we go down this path.



Bannon said he might consider a deal in which China got North Korea to freeze its nuclear buildup with verifiable inspections and the United States removed its troops from the peninsula, but such a deal seemed remote. Given that China is not likely to do much more on North Korea, and that the logic of mutually assured destruction was its own source of restraint, Bannon saw no reason not to proceed with tough trade sanctions against China.



“To me,” Bannon said, “the economic war with China is everything. And we have to be maniacally focused on that. If we continue to lose it, we"re five years away, I think, ten years at the most, of hitting an inflection point from which we"ll never be able to recover.”



Contrary to Trump’s threat of fire and fury, Bannon said of Korea:





"On Korea, [China"s] just tapping us along. It’s just a sideshow."



“There’s no military solution [to North Korea’s nuclear threats], forget it.



Until somebody solves the part of the equation that shows me that ten million people in Seoul don’t die in the first 30 minutes from conventional weapons, I don’t know what you’re talking about, there’s no military solution here, they got us.”



Bannon went on to describe his battle inside the administration to take a harder line on China trade, and not to fall into a trap of wishful thinking in which complaints against China’s trade practices now had to take a backseat to the hope that China, as honest broker, would help restrain Kim.



Bannon’s plan of attack includes: a complaint under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act against Chinese coercion of technology transfers from American corporations doing business there, and follow-up complaints against steel and aluminum dumping.





“We’re going to run the tables on these guys. We’ve come to the conclusion that they’re in an economic war and they’re crushing us.”



With regard his internal adversaries, at the departments of State and Defense, who think the United States can enlist Beijing’s aid on the North Korean standoff, and at Treasury and the National Economic Council who don’t want to mess with the trading system, Bannon was ever harsher...





“Oh, they’re wetting themselves,” he said, explaining that the Section 301 complaint, which was put on hold when the war of threats with North Korea broke out, was shelved only temporarily, and will be revived in three weeks. As for other cabinet departments, Bannon has big plans to marginalize their influence.



“That’s a fight I fight every day here,” he said. “We’re still fighting. There’s Treasury and [National Economic Council chair] Gary Cohn and Goldman Sachs lobbying.”



“We gotta do this. The president’s default position is to do it, but the apparatus is going crazy. Don’t get me wrong. It’s like, every day.”



Bannon dismissed the far-right as irrelevant:





“Ethno-nationalism—it"s losers. It"s a fringe element. I think the media plays it up too much, and we gotta help crush it, you know, uh, help crush it more.”



“These guys are a collection of clowns,” he added.



And finally, Bannon scoffed at The Democrats...





“...the longer they talk about identity politics, I got ’em. I want them to talk about racism every day. If the left is focused on race and identity, and we go with economic nationalism, we can crush the Democrats.



Read more here...


Bannon going down with a fight or a massive effort to distract from the carnage of the last few days? You decide.

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Speculation Of Bannon's Demise Floods The Media, Again

Bannon"s imminent demise has been predicted by the media on so many different occasions since Trump moved into the White House that we"ve lost count.  Not surprisingly, the media sometimes has difficultly deciphering between "news" and the propagation of their own wishful thinking.  We noted a couple of the false alarms here:






But, despite their inaccurate past predictions, the rampant speculation of Bannon"s early demise rages on in the mainstream media with the latest installment coming from the New York Times.





Rupert Murdoch has repeatedly urged President Trump to fire him. Anthony Scaramucci, the president’s former communications director, thrashed him on television as a white nationalist. Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, the national security adviser, refused to even say he could work with him.



For months, Mr. Trump has considered ousting Stephen K. Bannon, the White House chief strategist and relentless nationalist who ran the Breitbart website and called it a “platform for the alt-right.” Mr. Trump has sent Mr. Bannon to a kind of internal exile, and has not met face-to-face for more than a week with a man who was once a fixture in the Oval Office, according to aides and friends of the president.



But the choice might not be his. At a recent dinner at the White House with Mr. Kushner and Mr. Kelly, before Mr. Trump decamped for a working vacation at his private golf club in Bedminster, N.J., the president listened while one of the guests, Mr. Murdoch, a founder of Fox News, said Mr. Bannon had to go.



Mr. Trump offered little pushback, according to a person familiar with the conversation, and vented his frustrations about Mr. Bannon. Mr. Murdoch is close to Mr. Kushner, who has been in open warfare with Mr. Bannon since the spring.



Bannon



Meanwhile, Anthony Scaramucci, who lasted all of 10 days in the White House, once again took shots at Bannon last night in an interview with Stephen Colbert saying "if it was up to me, he"d be gone."




According to the New York Times, Bannon has allegedly hedged his future prospects in the White House by telling friends that he never really expected to last long in the Chief Strategist position anyway.





From the start, Mr. Bannon, 63, has told people in his orbit that he never expected to last in his current position longer than eight months to a year, and hoped to ram through as much of his agenda as he could while he stood in the president’s favor. More recently he has told friends that he is working in the White House one day at a time, and constantly asks himself whether he could better pursue his to-do list — including cracking down on legal and illegal immigration — on the outside.



So, will Nancy Pelosi, and the mainstream media, finally get their wish?


Monday, August 7, 2017

Stephen Miller Is Reportedly In The Running For Scaramucci's Old Job At The White House

President Donald Trump has barely been in office for six months and already he"s seen three communications directors come and go – Mike Dubke, Sean Spicer (who handled its duties when the post was vacant) and Anthony Scaramucci.


And now sources inside the White House are telling Axios that Senior Policy Adviser Stephen Miller is in the running for the communications director job after his on-camera thrashings of CNN’s Jim Acosta and the NYT’s Glenn Thrush elicited widespread praise from conservatives last week and reportedly made an impression on the president.



To be sure, the Trump administration is still “in the name-gathering process” and Miller isn’t even the top contender for the job. Miller faces some opposition, including from members of the Republican establishment, who believe he’s “unpersuasive.” But the fact that he made Acosta look like a “jacka**” in front of the whole country has helped him in Trump’s estimation. 


Miller’s experience working with the media began during his stint as an aide to then-Senator Jeff Sessions. At the time, he “was effectively an adjunct of the Breitbart team,” according to Axios. During his tenure in the White House, he’s already helped shape the administration’s communications strategy by working on some of Trump’s biggest speeches, including the “American Carnage” inaugural address, which he co-wrote with Steve Bannon.



Miller also has a reputation for “bugging reporters at all hours with his story pitches, and seemingly had a direct line to Matt Drudge. The running joke was that the Sessions" office had a permanent lease on at least one of the prized top-left Drudge links.”


As Axios notes, the quality that Trump values most is an aide"s ability to make him look good on television – particularly if they can do it at the expense of a CNN or NYT reporter, like Miller did.



Even Thrush admits that Miller is obviously qualified.



But the most important question, which Axios doesn’t address, is what’s the relationship like between Miller and Trump’s new Chief of Staff John Kelly, who was widely credited with ousting Scaramucci from the communications director post last month after he had held the job for only 10 days. Miller’s knack for currying favor with the Jared and Ivanka faction in the West Wing has helped him establish a reputation as someone who’s widely liked and respected in the administration, particularly for his “rainman” like ability to recall immigration statistics.


Still, does he have the "General"s" respect? His chances of lasting in the job more than just a few weeks depend on it.
 

Thursday, August 3, 2017

President Trump Says He Will Make A "Very Big Announcement" Tonight

President Trump just teased a "very big announcement for the press and everyone else" that will take place at his planned rally in West Virginia tonight....



President Trump is due to arrive at the the event at 18:20 ET and is due to begin speaking at 19:05 ET (departing at 20:30 ET).


So - what will it be?


His resignation? War with North Korea? Perry as Homeland Security head? Scaramucci is coming back? Sessions is fired? Rewriting the Constitution? Martial Law? Mueller fired? Or... more on record high stocks, great jobs, and how awesome he is doing?

Wednesday, August 2, 2017

What Are Generals Mattis & Kelly So Afraid Of?

Pragmatic top-down policy or anxious bottom-up babysitting?


Deep in the background of an AP report on the decision to replace Anthony Scaramucci with  John Kelly, The Hill reports that two of President Trump"s top advisers reportedly agreed in the early days of the administration that they would not leave the United States at the same time, in order to ensure they could monitor orders coming from the White House.



The pact, revealed to The AP by an anonymous official close to Mattis and Kelly, seems to hint at the nature of the Trump administration"s internal relations.





Secretary of Defense James Mattis and then-Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly also agreed in the earliest weeks of Trump"s presidency that one of them should remain in the United States at all times to keep tabs on the orders rapidly emerging from the White House, according to a person familiar with the discussions. The official insisted on anonymity in order to discuss the administration"s internal dynamics.




Both Mattis and Kelly have been active in providing clarification of executive orders released by the White House.


With Kelly now Trump"s right hand, we suspect the "control" will improve (though the tweets haven"t slowed down yet). Citi was very positive on Kelly"s appointment.





From a markets perspective, I see this as exceedingly positive - Kelly"s appointment should lead to a tighter message, far less drama (and the accompanying headline risk) and a focus on passing Trump"s business-friendly agenda. 



As an American, I am cautiously optimistic, trying to believe this transition as “bouncing off the bottom” following a difficult week for the administration. 



Trump, a graduate of adolescent military school, is expected to embrace the new, disciplined WH culture that should allow him to focus on his agenda as opposed to bouncing from controversy to tweet to controversy to tweet.



But we still wonder - as we did at the start - are Mattis and Kelly staying close to Trump by the president"s pragmatic leadership demanding his highest ranking generals are close... or did they decide unilaterally that Trump should not be left alone?


And if so - what are they so afraid of?

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Scaramucci Listed As Dead In Latest Harvard Alumni Directory

It was a bad day for Anthony Scaramucci: first the Mooch was fired just ten days after he was first hired, in the brief process getting served with divorce papers and missing the birth of his baby while unleashing a bizarre rant for the ages, and then shortly after, his now former boss, the president of the US, the same one who earlier said there was no chaos at the White House, tweeted that it was "A great day at the White House"


In this case, one of the responses to the Trump tweet was substantially more informative than the original:



And then, adding insult to pink slip, CBS reported that Harvard Law School apologized for erroneously listing Anthony Scaramucci as dead in its new alumni directory.


No, really: a directory mailed to alumni this week included an asterisk by the name of Scaramucci, a 1989 graduate of the Cambridge, Massachusetts, university, indicating he had died.





A statement from the law school apologizes for the error and says it will be corrected in future editions. It doesn"t provide an explanation for the error. The directory is published every five years and is available only to alumni of the Ivy League law school.



If there was any consolation for Scaramucci, it came from People Magazine, which reported that the lawyer representing the estranged wife of ousted White House communications director denied the NY Post report that the couple ended their marriage because of President Trump.


"I don’t know where that came from, but it is not accurate. It is a false fact,” divorce lawyer Jill Stone, who represents Deidre Ball, told People magazine on Monday.


So at least that wasn"t Trump"s fault. And now that he is once again out of the public eye, Scaramucci may finally get what he requested just 48 hours ago: a plea to leave his family out of it.



To top off an emotional day for all, here is some humor from The Onion:





Following his abrupt dismissal just 10 days after being named White House communications director, Anthony Scaramucci reportedly received an outpouring of sympathetic texts Monday from friends and family expressing that they were “so fuckin’ sorry to hear about this shit.”



“My deepest motherfuckin’ condolences, Tony, it’s terrible to hear you got shit-canned by these ass-munching cocks in D.C.,” read a text message in part, just one of dozens sent by old buddies at Goldman Sachs, current business partners at SkyBridge Capital, and extended family in New Jersey in response to his “goddamn bullshit” dismissal.



“Sorry to hear those bitches gave you the fucking ax, Mooch. That jackass [John] Kelly got no fucking clue what a good fuckin’ dude you are. Just know your mother and I always got your fucking back.” At press time, Scaramucci’s New York office was reportedly filled with flower arrangements and handwritten cards lamenting that this was “absolute fucking trash.”


Monday, July 31, 2017

Scarmucci did well during his 10-day tenure as W.H. communications director, stirred hornets’ nest


scaramucciNew York financier Anthony Scaramucci (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)




(INTELLIHUB) — President Donald Trump abruptly removed White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci from his post on Monday after Scarmucci repeatedly verbally lashed out towards other staffers on multiple occasions over the past week.


Although Scarmucci’s tenure as communications director was short-lived and only lasted 10-days — you have to give the man credit for stirring up the hornets’ nest. After all, he wanted to “kill leakers.”


The brash New Yorker was the reason that Sean Spicer resigned. He even called Reince Priebus a “fu*king paranoid schizophrenic” and slammed Bannon as a “co*ksucker.”


The man was on fire! How else were leakers to be flushed out and dealt with?


So who’s decision was it to get rid of Scaramucci?


According to the New York Times: “The decision to remove Mr. Scaramucci, who had boasted about reporting directly to the president, not the chief of staff, John F. Kelly, came at Mr. Kelly’s request, the people said. Mr. Kelly made clear to members of the White House staff at a meeting Monday morning that he is in charge.”


©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.



Kiss The Mooch Goodbye

(ZHE) — That didn’t take long: just ten days after Anthony Scaramucci was appointed as the new White House communications director, the NYT reports that Trump has removed Scaramucci from the role of Communications Director, as requested by the new chief of staff, John Kelly.



According to the NYT, Scaramucci’s abrupt removal came just 10 days after the wealthy New York financier was brought on to the West Wing staff, a move that convulsed an already chaotic White House and led to the departures of Sean Spicer, the former press secretary, and Reince Priebus, the president’s first chief of staff.








The decision to remove Mr. Scaramucci, who had boasted about reporting directly to the president not the chief of staff, John F. Kelly, came at Mr. Kelly’s request, the people said. Mr. Kelly made clear to members of the White House staff at a meeting Monday morning that he is in charge.


It was not clear whether Mr. Scaramucci will remain employed at the White House in another position or will leave altogether.



ABC adds that Scaramucci offered his resignation to Gen. Kelly this morning, with a request to be moved to the Ex-Im bank.




Or, as Trump would say, no chaos at all, just look at the stock market.










By Tyler Durden / Republished with permission / Zero HedgeReport a typo





This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.





Saturday, July 29, 2017

Trump Fires Priebus, Names Gen. Kelly New Chief Of Staff

Update:  As speculation abounds over social media over precisely when Reince was fired or quit, he has just released the following statement:





"It has been one of the greatest honors of my life to serve the President and our country.  I want to thank the President for giving me this very special opportunity.  I will continue to serve as a strong supporter of the President"s agenda and policies.  I can"t think of a better person that General John Kelly to succeed me and I him God"s blessings and great success."




* * *


After Thursday"s bizarre, widely publicized breakdown by Anthony Scaramucci, Trump had no choice: he had to pick either the former SkyBridge founder or his Chief of Staff, Reince "paranoid schizophrenic" Priebus.



Moments ago Trump made his decision - Priebus has been fired, replaced by retired four-star Marine general John Kelly, and current Homeland Security head, John Kelly who Trump frequently credits for dramatically reducing the number of undocumented immigrants coming into the U.S. from Mexico. He called Kelly "a true star" in a tweet announcing the appointment.


Trump tweeted: "I am pleased to inform you that I have just named General/Secretary John F Kelly as White House Chief of Staff. He is a Great American and a Great Leader. John has also done a spectacular job at Homeland Security. He has been a true star of my Administration."




Trump announced the decision on Twitter as his plane landed at Andrews. Trump also tweeted his token thanks to Priebus "for his service and dedication to his country" saying "we accomplished a lot together and I am proud of him!."



The circumstances of Priebus" exit were curious. The now former Chief of Staff parted ways with Trump on the tarmac outside of Air Force One Friday following the announcement he would no longer serve as President Trump"s chief of staff. Priebus was returning with Trump and other White House staff from an event in Long Island, New York, the Hill reported. Upon their return to Andrews Air Force Base, Trump made the announcement Priebus was out of the top White House position.


In a rain-soaked Washington, D.C., Priebus had initially gotten into a van with White House Policy Adviser Stephen Miller and White House Social Media Director Dan Scavino on the tarmac, but shortly after, the two men left the van and left Priebus alone, according to a White House press pool report.


The former chief of staff"s car then peeled away from the president"s motorcade and left while Trump remained on Air Force One.


* * *


Also according to press reports the final straw for Reince Priebus was the overnight failure by Senate republicans to pass Obamacare repeal as a result of John McCain"s stunning decision to vote against the GOP.


Then again, NBC reports that it wasn"t Trump who fired Priebus, but Priebus who resigned on Thursday. And just to make things even more convoluted, Reuters also reports that Trump originally informed Priebus two weeks ago that he would be replacing him as White House chief of staff.


Assuming Priebus was indeed fired first, that would mark the11th time Trump has told someone "you"re fired" since the election. The list, in chronological order, includes:


  • Yates

  • Flynn

  • Walsh

  • Bharara

  • Comey

  • Dubke

  • Shaub

  • Corralo

  • Spicer

  • Short

  • Priebus

In any case, speaking to reporters, Trump called Priebus a "good man" but called Kelly a "star." 


"Reince is a good man," he said at Andrews Air Force Base outside of Washington, D.C., after a trip to New York to talk about his push to end gang violence. "John Kelly will do a fantastic job. Gen. Kelly has been a star, done an incredible job thus far, respected by everybody. He"s a great American," he said.


WaPo"s Robert Kosta tweets that "Kushner"s allies soured on Priebus b/c they saw the msg/strategy on Russia as off/weak..."


How Trump"s decision will be greeted by the more moderate part of his base remains to be seen, although with Trump siding against Priebus, it may mean that Bannon could be next on the chopping block, a move which would infuriate a core part of Trump"s electorate, a material gamble for a president with a precarious approval rating.


As for ret. Gen. John Kelly, the current low profile Homeland Security Secretary, a quick reminder who he is: he he was in the military for 45 years - a very long time, even for a general. He was once the head of US Southern Command, putting much of the US" immediate vicinity under his purview - including the control of Guantanamo Bay.


Here Kosta adds that "Kushner and Bannon both really like Kelly, which made the decision easier. Someone who has appeal to the two main blocs in WH..."


His full bio is below.





General Kelly was born and raised in Boston, MA. He enlisted in the Marine Corps in 1970, and was discharged as a sergeant in 1972, after serving in an infantry company with the 2nd Marine Division, Camp Lejeune, NC. Following graduation from the University of Massachusetts in 1976, he was commissioned and returned to the 2nd Marine Division where he served as a rifle and weapons platoon commander, company executive officer, assistant operations officer, and infantry company commander. Sea duty in Mayport, FL, followed, at which time he served aboard aircraft carriers USS Forrestal and USS Independence. In 1980, then Captain Kelly transferred to the U.S. Army"s Infantry Officer Advanced Course in Fort Benning, GA. After graduation, he was assigned to Headquarters Marine Corps, Washington, DC, serving there from 1981 through 1984, as an assignment monitor. Captain Kelly returned to the 2nd Marine Division in 1984, to command a rifle and weapons company. Promoted to the rank of Major in 1987, he served as the battalion"s operations officer.



In 1987, Major Kelly transferred to the Basic School, Quantico, VA, serving first as the head of the Offensive Tactics Section, Tactics Group, and later assuming the duties of the Director of the Infantry Officer Course. After three years of instructing young officers, he attended the Marine Corps Command and Staff College, and the School for Advanced Warfare, both located at Quantico. Completing duty under instruction and selected for Lieutenant Colonel, he was assigned as Commanding Officer, 1st Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion, 1st Marine Division, Camp Pendleton, CA. Holding this command position for two years, Lieutenant Colonel Kelly returned to the East Coast in 1994, to attend the National War College inWashington, DC. He graduated in 1995, and was selected to serve as the Commandant"s Liaison Officer to the U.S. House of Representatives, Capitol Hill, where he was promoted to the rank of Colonel.



In 1999, Colonel Kelly transferred to joint duty and served as the Special Assistant to the Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, in Mons, Belgium. He returned to the United States in 2001, and was assigned to a third tour of duty at Camp Lejeune, now as the Assistant Chief of Staff G-3 with the 2nd Marine Division. In 2002, selected to the rank of Brigadier General, Colonel Kelly again served with the 1st Marine Division, this time as the Assistant Division Commander. Much of Brigadier General Kelly"s two-year assignment was spent deployed in Iraq. He then returned to Headquarters Marine Corps as the Legislative Assistant to the Commandant from 2004 to 2007. Promoted to major general, he returned to Camp Pendleton as the Commanding General, I Marine Expeditionary Force (Forward). The command deployed to Iraq in early 2008 for a year-long mission, replacing II Marine Expeditionary Force (Forward) as Multinational Force-West in Al Anbar and western Ninewa provinces. LtGen Kelly commanded Marine Forces Reserve and Marine Forces North from October 2009 to March 2011. General Kelly comes to United States Southern Command from his previous position as the Senior Military Assistant to the Secretary of Defense from March 2011 to October 2012.



What happens next is a great unknown for this rollercoaster administration, but with a military veteran now whispering in Trump"s ear every day, Kim Jong-Un"s days are now numbered.


Meanwhile, the message from today"s events seems to be that Trump has largely cut most - if not all - ties with the Republican party.

Friday, July 28, 2017

Scaramucci: “Priebus is a f**king paranoid schizophrenic”, slams “cocksucker” Bannon, wants to “kill” leakers

Update: After what was either (i) his first White House nervous breakdown or (ii) a carefully disguised distraction intended to give the media something other than Russia to discuss on this weekend’s political talk show circuit, Anthony Scaramucci has just issued the following statement via Twitter:




And then, the White House communications director followed up with this:




* * *


Details have emerged about Anthony Scaramucci’s bizarre overnight breakdown, in which he accused Trump’s chief of staff Reince Priebus of leaking details of a private dinner he had with Trump,  Melania, Sean Hannity and Bill Shine, as well as accusing the former GOP head of a “felony” leak of Scaramucci’s financial disclosures.


The New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza has released the details of a phone call he received on Wednesday night from Scaramucci, after tweeting shortly prior that “Trump is dining tonight w/Sean Hannnity, Bill Shine (former Fox News executive), & Anthony Scaramucci, per to 2 knowledgeable sources.” As discussed earlier, Scaramucci was furious that Lizza found out about the dinner and convinced that Priebus was the one who told Lizza about it, tried to get an admission out of Lizza. After threatening to fire the entire White House communication staff if Lizza did not reveal the identity of his source, Trump’s new communications chief furiously blasted that “Reince is a fucking paranoid schizophrenic, a paranoiac,” and claimed that Priebus would be asked to resign.





“Who leaked that to you?” he asked. I said I couldn’t give him that information. He responded by threatening to fire the entire White House communications staff. “What I’m going to do is, I will eliminate everyone in the comms team and we’ll start over,” he said. I laughed, not sure if he really believed that such a threat would convince a journalist to reveal a source. He continued to press me and complain about the staff he’s inherited in his new job. “I ask these guys not to leak anything and they can’t help themselves,” he said. “You’re an American citizen, this is a major catastrophe for the American country. So I’m asking you as an American patriot to give me a sense of who leaked it.”


* * *


He reiterated that Priebus would resign soon, and he noted that he told Trump that he expected Priebus to launch a campaign against him. “He didn’t get the hint that I was reporting directly to the President,” he said. “And I said to the President here are the four or five things that he will do to me.” His list of allegations included leaking the Hannity dinner and the details from his financial-disclosure form.



After this gentle gambit failed to generate the desired outcome, Scaramucci then warned that “they’ll all be fired by me,” he said of the White House communications staff. “I fired one guy the other day. I have three to four people I’ll fire tomorrow. I’ll get to the person who leaked that to you. Reince Priebus—if you want to leak something—he’ll be asked to resign very shortly.”


The enraged Scaramucci continued chanelling Priebus: “‘Oh, Bill Shine is coming in. Let me leak the fucking thing and see if I can cock-block these people the way I cock-blocked Scaramucci for six months.’ ”


Earlier in the day, the fund manager insinuated on twitter that Trump’s top aide was behind the “leak” of his financial disclosure forms, which subsequently it turned out were not leaked, but we public for anyone to access.


As Lizza notes, while Scaramucci’s first public appearance as communications director was a slick and conciliatory, suggesting it was time for the White House to turn a page, since then, he has become obsessed with leaks and threatened to fire staffers if he discovers that they have given unauthorized information to reporters. Michael Short, a White House press aide considered close to Priebus, resigned on Tuesday after Scaramucci publicly spoke about firing him. Meanwhile, several damaging stories about Scaramucci have appeared in the press, and he blamed Priebus for most of them.


Separately, Scaramucci also lashed out at Trump’s chief strategist Stephen Bannon in the same phone call.


“I’m not Steve Bannon, I’m not trying to suck my own cock,” he said, speaking of Trump’s chief strategist. “I’m not trying to build my own brand off the fucking strength of the President. I’m here to serve the country.”


Lizza’s assessment of the bizarre behavior: “I got the sense that Scaramucci’s campaign against leakers flows from his intense loyalty to Trump. Unlike other Trump advisers, I’ve never heard him say a bad word about the President. “What I want to do is I want to fucking kill all the leakers and I want to get the President’s agenda on track so we can succeed for the American people,” he told me.”


Trump, who has previously expressed his strong support and admiration for Scaramucci, has yet to opine.


Via Zero Hedge

Scaramucci: "Priebus Is A F**king Paranoid Schizophrenic", Slams "Cocksucker" Bannon, Wants To "Kill" Leakers

Update: After what was either (i) his first White House nervous breakdown or (ii) a carefully disguised distraction intended to give the media something other than Russia to discuss on this weekend"s political talk show circuit, Anthony Scaramucci has just issued the following statement via Twitter:



* * *


Details have emerged about Anthony Scaramucci"s bizarre overnight breakdown, in which he accused Trump"s chief of staff Reince Priebus of leaking details of a private dinner he had with Trump,  Melania, Sean Hannity and Bill Shine, as well as accusing the former GOP head of a "felony" leak of Scaramucci"s financial disclosures. 


The New Yorker"s Ryan Lizza has released the details of a phone call he received on Wednesday night from Scaramucci, after tweeting shortly prior that "Trump is dining tonight w/Sean Hannnity, Bill Shine (former Fox News executive), & Anthony Scaramucci, per to 2 knowledgeable sources." As discussed earlier, Scaramucci was furious that Lizza found out about the dinner and convinced that Priebus was the one who told Lizza about it, tried to get an admission out of Lizza. After threatening to fire the entire White House communication staff if Lizza did not reveal the identity of his source, Trump"s new communications chief furiously blasted that “Reince is a fucking paranoid schizophrenic, a paranoiac,” and claimed that Priebus would be asked to resign.





“Who leaked that to you?” he asked. I said I couldn’t give him that information. He responded by threatening to fire the entire White House communications staff. “What I’m going to do is, I will eliminate everyone in the comms team and we’ll start over,” he said. I laughed, not sure if he really believed that such a threat would convince a journalist to reveal a source. He continued to press me and complain about the staff he’s inherited in his new job. “I ask these guys not to leak anything and they can’t help themselves,” he said. “You’re an American citizen, this is a major catastrophe for the American country. So I’m asking you as an American patriot to give me a sense of who leaked it.”



* * *


He reiterated that Priebus would resign soon, and he noted that he told Trump that he expected Priebus to launch a campaign against him. “He didn’t get the hint that I was reporting directly to the President,” he said. “And I said to the President here are the four or five things that he will do to me.” His list of allegations included leaking the Hannity dinner and the details from his financial-disclosure form.



After this gentle gambit failed to generate the desired outcome, Scaramucci then warned that “they’ll all be fired by me,” he said of the White House communications staff. “I fired one guy the other day. I have three to four people I’ll fire tomorrow. I’ll get to the person who leaked that to you. Reince Priebus—if you want to leak something—he’ll be asked to resign very shortly.”


The enraged Scaramucci continued chanelling Priebus: “‘Oh, Bill Shine is coming in. Let me leak the fucking thing and see if I can cock-block these people the way I cock-blocked Scaramucci for six months.’ ”


Earlier in the day, the fund manager insinuated on twitter that Trump’s top aide was behind the “leak” of his financial disclosure forms, which subsequently it turned out were not leaked, but we public for anyone to access.



As Lizza notes, while Scaramucci’s first public appearance as communications director was a slick and conciliatory, suggesting it was time for the White House to turn a page, since then, he has become obsessed with leaks and threatened to fire staffers if he discovers that they have given unauthorized information to reporters. Michael Short, a White House press aide considered close to Priebus, resigned on Tuesday after Scaramucci publicly spoke about firing him. Meanwhile, several damaging stories about Scaramucci have appeared in the press, and he blamed Priebus for most of them.


Separately, Scaramucci also lashed out at Trump"s chief strategist Stephen Bannon in the same phone call.


“I’m not Steve Bannon, I’m not trying to suck my own cock,” he said, speaking of Trump’s chief strategist. “I’m not trying to build my own brand off the fucking strength of the President. I’m here to serve the country.”


Lizza"s assessment of the bizarre behavior: "I got the sense that Scaramucci’s campaign against leakers flows from his intense loyalty to Trump. Unlike other Trump advisers, I’ve never heard him say a bad word about the President. “What I want to do is I want to fucking kill all the leakers and I want to get the President’s agenda on track so we can succeed for the American people,” he told me."


Trump, who has previously expressed his strong support and admiration for Scaramucci, has yet to opine.

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Scaramucci Implicates Priebus In Now-Deleted Tweet Following 'Felony' Leak Of $85 Mil Net Worth

 

White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci set of a firestorm of speculation last night with a now deleted tweet following a Politico article containing information he claimed was leaked - revealing his net worth at $85 million. Scaramucci stated that he "will be contacting @FBI and the @TheJusticeDept #swamp @Reince45," oddly tagging White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus.



In response, Twitter exploded with rumors that Priebus was a White House leaker - an implication which Ryan Lizza of The New Yorker (and contributor to CNN) somehow confirmed.







30 minutes later, another "blue check" Twitter user - Josh Kraushaar from National Journal, tweeted "@RyanLizza reports on CNN that Mooch already contacted the FBI about Reince // not just a threat (as he said in tweet)."




As speculation reached a fevered pitch, Scaramucci - who keeps his phone at 100% charge - poured cold water over the hopes and dreams of everyone who hates Reince, tweeting "Wrong! Tweet was public notice to leakers that all Sr Adm officials are helping to end illegal leaks. @Reince45"


 



While Scaramucci said the "leak" of his financial disclosure form was a "felony," The New York Times reported that the document, filed on June 23, could have been released July 23 upon a journalist"s request. When reached for comment as to why he thought there was an illegal leak, Scaramucci told the NYT "They aren"t in process yet."


Hannity interview - and then dinner? 


Earlier in the evening, Scaramucci appeared on Fox News with Sean Hannity to discuss the leaks, where he said that the leaks were actually orders from senior officials handed down to underlings.



One of the big problems here that I"m discovering in the comms team is that senior people are really the guys doing the leaking, and they ask junior people to leak for them. So, I"m very proud to be reporting directly to the president so that I can hermetically seal off the comms team from this sort of nonsense.


You and I both know that there are political holdovers from the Obama administration that want to put a hurt on the Trump administration, so we have to sort of move quickly there as well. -Anthony Scaramucci



  


In response to Scaramucci"s appearance on Hannity, the DOJ issued this statement:




And in yet another "leaked" tidbit from earlier yesterday, Ryan Lizza also reported that president Trump, Sean Hannity, Bill Shine, and Anthony Scaramucci had plans to eat dinner together last night.


 



Don"t read too much into it, but apparently Reince wasn"t there...

Wednesday, July 26, 2017

Scaramucci Singles Out Obama's "Political Holdovers" As White House Leakers

Having "terminated" his first White House leaker yesterday, President Trump"s newly-minted comms director has wasted no time in making many feel uncomfortable in the their roles (and rightly so).



Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com


Speaking on Fox News, The Hill reports that Scaramucci said that "political holdovers" from the Obama White House "aren"t helping," and hinted that more staff changes could be on the way.



"Listen, we have to crack down on leaks on a number of different fronts," Scaramucci told "Fox and Friends."



"There seems to be some holdovers, political holdovers from the Obama administration that are not helping," he added.



"I certainly have the full responsibility in the comms shop, which I do believe will be corrected shortly."



Scaramucci cautioned viewers to remember that it"s impossible for him to reach a point of absolutely no leaks, but pledged to clean up the White House press office.





"People are suggesting I"m going to try to get the leaks down to zero, that is absolutely impossible in Washington, I"m learning a little about this town, but what I do want to have happen is people who report to me, if there are senior people in the administration trying to get them to leak information on each other, we"re getting that to stop right now."



Finally, Mooch The Merciless told Fox:





D.C. is the kind of town where people are "very nice to your face," but then stab you in the back.


"I"m more of a front-stabbing person," he said.



It appears that is just what The White House needs.

Sunday, July 23, 2017

Scaramucci: "If The Leaks Don't Stop, I’m Going To Pare Down The Staff"

One day after new White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci scoured through his Twitter account, deleting any tweets (mostly critical of Trump) that could be a "distraction" for the White House, on Sunday morning the former Goldman employee pledged that as one of his first steps, he would "take dramatic action" to halt the biggest problem plaguing the Trump White House: the endless torrent of leaks. 


"I will take dramatic action to stop those leaks," Scaramucci told Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday" adding that while he could not control leaks coming from the intergovernmental agencies, he would take action in the White House communications department.


"If the leaks don"t stop, I’m going to pare down the staff because it"s not fair to the president, to America, and to the people in government" he threatened while adding that "everyone can stay if the follow protocol against the leaks."



Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com



Scaramucci"s appointment as communications director on Friday set off the latest in a series of leaks describing White House in-fighting, with Scaramucci"s appointment eventually prompting then-White House press secretary Sean Spicer to resign.


The incoming communications director also said he would focus on refining White House-press relations. "There is some fake news unfortunately," he said, adding that there were specific people in the media who "stretch or fabricate things."  Scaramucci also explained that he would use social media and Trump"s abilities as a communicator to overcome negative stories.


Later in the same interview, Scaramucci said that the Russia "situation" has been "overblown," and the  White House is looking to "deescalate" it. 


“We certainly want to deescalate things," Scaramucci told Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday.” "I think the Russian situation is overblown” he said, adding that the meeting with the Russian attorney was a non-event.



Scaramucci addressed the recent WaPo report that Trump and his legal team are exploring ways he could potentially pardon himself and those close to him in regards to the ongoing probe into alleged collusion between his campaign and Russia. “He has no one to pardon. He hasn’t done anything wrong. He was just making a statement about power to pardon,” he said.


Trump on Saturday said "all" agree that he has "complete power to pardon" in a tweet blasting leaks in his administration.


Separately, during a whirlwind Sunday morning media tour, Scaramucci addressed the same topic during an interview on CNN"s "State of the Union," in which he was asked about Trump"s tweet in which he said: "while all agree the U. S. President has the complete power to pardon, why think of that when only crime so far is LEAKS against us."


Scaramucci responded that the tweet is proof that Trump isn"t thinking about pardons related to the investigation.


"He"s basically saying he doesn"t have to pardon anybody," Scaramucci said when asked who the president is thinking about pardoning.


"The president is thinking about pardoning nobody...The president is not going to have to pardon anybody because the Russia thing is a nonsensical thing."


During the same interview, Scaramucci said he expects achievements to be made on both healthcare and tax reform over the next six months. "These things, they go up and down, president is an experienced business person, he"s a very effective politician," he said.


"I just think we need to deliver the messaging a little bit differently than we"ve been doing it in the past." The new White House comms director also said the economy is "super strong" and business optimism is "way up.

Friday, July 21, 2017

Spicer Resigns As White House Press Secretary, Replaced By Anthony Scaramucci

It"s official: moments ago the much anticipated departure of (now former) White House press secretary and communications director, Sean Spicer took place, when according to the NYT, Spicer resigned on Friday morning, "telling President Trump he vehemently disagreed with the appointment of New York financier Anthony Scaramucci as communications director."





Mr. Trump offered Mr. Scaramucci the job at 10 a.m. The president requested that Mr. Spicer stay on, but Mr. Spicer told Mr. Trump that he believed the appointment was a major mistake, according to person with direct knowledge of the exchange.



News of Spicer"s resignation was promptly greeted with trolling by many...



... including Maxine Waters:



To all those who bought the "No" contract: congratulations: it"s payout time:




Meanwhile, as noted above, Trump appointed former SkyBridge Capital founder Anthony Scaramucci as White House Communications Director.



Scaramucci has been a vocal supporter of the president, having served in a top financial advisory role on Trump’s campaign. He has been an ardent defender of the president in television interviews.



He was also the subject of the recent hit piece from CNN that the network was forced to retract and apologize to him for, a piece that inaccurately accused him of being under multiple investigations—he is not under any—for “meetings” that never happened with Russian bankers. Three senior CNN editorial officials resigned over the story, amounting to what is still developing into one of the biggest scandals in journalistic history.


While news of Scaramucci"s appointment first broke on Thursday night, White House chief of staff Reince Priebus tried to scuttle the appointment of Scaramucci due to a reported long-running feud with him, according to Breitbart, which adds that Steve Bannon, the ex-Executive Chairman of Breitbart News now the White House chief strategist, also objected to the Scaramucci appointment.





Bannon and Priebus have an alliance inside the White House where they are frequently at loggerheads with the “West Wing Democrats” like National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, National Economic Council director Gary Cohn, Jared Kusher, Ivanka Trump, and others.



Those opposed to the Scaramucci appointment did not succeed.



Sean Spicer Resigns as White House Press Secretary

(ZHEIt’s official: moments ago the much anticipated departure of (now former) White House press secretary, Sean Spicer took place, when according to the NYT Spicer resigned on Friday morning, “telling President Trump he vehemently disagreed with the appointment of New York financier Anthony Scaramucci as communications director.”




Mr. Trump offered Mr. Scaramucci the job at 10 a.m. The president requested that Mr. Spicer stay on, but Mr. Spicer told Mr. Trump that he believed the appointment was a major mistake, according to person with direct knowledge of the exchange.



News of Spicer’s resignation was promptly greeted with trolling by many, including Maxine Waters:









To all those who bought the “No” contract: congratulations: it’s payout time:









Meanwhile, as hinted above, Trump appointed former SkyBridge Capital founder Anthony Scaramucci as White House Communications Director.







Scaramucci has been a vocal supporter of the president, having served in a top financial advisory role on Trump’s campaign. He has been an ardent defender of the president in television interviews.




He was also the subject of the recent hit piece from CNN that the network was forced to retract and apologize to him for, a piece that inaccurately accused him of being under multiple investigations—he is not under any—for “meetings” that never happened with Russian bankers. Three senior CNN editorial officials resigned over the story, amounting to what is still developing into one of the biggest scandals in journalistic history.


While news of Scaramucci’s appointment first broke on Thursday night, White House chief of staff Reince Priebus tried to scuttle the appointment of Scaramucci due to a reported long-running feud with him, according to Breitbart, which adds that Steve Bannon, the ex-Executive Chairman of Breitbart News now the White House chief strategist, also objected to the Scaramucci appointment.



Bannon and Priebus have an alliance inside the White House where they are frequently at loggerheads with the “West Wing Democrats” like National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, National Economic Council director Gary Cohn, Jared Kusher, Ivanka Trump, and others.



Those opposed to the Scaramucci appointment did not succeed.






By Tyler Durden / Republished with permission / ZeroHedge.com / Report a typo


This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.





Monday, March 20, 2017

FLOOD THE SWAMP




(ANTIMEDIA) The duty of a Washington DC lobbyist is to bend the ears of lawmakers and administration officials in the hopes of influencing bills and initiatives that might divvy out taxpayer dollars to corporations or keep regulatory agencies sniffing in other directions. When Trump assumed the presidency, many lobbyists were wringing their hands. His pledge to “drain the swamp” and widely praised policy to discourage revolving doors between the private and public sectors indicated they would fall on hard times. However, President Trump’s choices of appointees to his administration have repeatedly shown that even if Trump appears unswayed by lobbyist influence, D.C.’s love affair with the corporate state is far from over.




We"re revolutionizing the news industry, but we need your help! Click here to get started.




Goldman Sachs was, to some extent, ousted from a long-standing seat of power after the recession. Though President Obama invited Wall Street insiders into his administration, he also signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law, a bill that, among other things, established the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, an agency designated to place a stricter emphasis on evaluating the practices of big banks.





Trump, whose administration is filled with Goldman Sachs affiliates, has repeatedly expressed his eagerness to repeal that bill. Sach’s spent millions on the election cycle alone; the Center for Responsive Politics reported that the Wall Street juggernaut forked over upwards of $5 million. Though the Trump administration did not receive those funds, he has nevertheless appointed a number of Sach’s alumni, including Treasury Secretary Steve Mnunchin and Senior Adviser Anthony Scaramucci. Even Steve Bannon, who is widely regarded as the most influential man in Washington, cut his teeth at the bank. Gary Cohn was working as Goldman’s Chief Operation Officer until Trump appointed him Director of the National Economic Council.


Despite Trump’s strong support among voters who feel ostracized by big industries, corporate America seems to have a seat at the table in the White House. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson faced a blistering confirmation hearing in which his ties to Exxon Mobil, the company he once led, were scrutinized. CNN reported that Tillerson has placed his stocks in that company under a blind trust, and while Exxon was one of the top spenders on lobbying during 2016, many hoped Tillerson’s former employer wouldn’t enjoy any privileges. Yet in a press release, the White House appeared to have plagiarized from the oil giant. Both press releases, one from the company and one from the White house, praised Exxon, reading:


“ExxonMobil is strategically investing in new refining and chemical-manufacturing projects in the U.S. Gulf Coast region to expand its manufacturing and export capacity. The company’s Growing the Gulf expansion program, consists of 11 major chemical, refining, lubricant and liquefied natural gas projects at proposed new and existing facilities along the Texas and Louisiana coasts. Investments began in 2013 and are expected to continue through at least 2022.”







Like Goldman Sachs, Exxon did not contribute funds to Trump’s campaign (Exxon employees did contribute over $90,000 to Hillary Clinton’s campaign while Sachs paid big fees to entice the former secretary of state to deliver private speeches at their company). Nevertheless, Exxon is enjoying ties to positions of extreme influence.


Trump continued this trend with his appointment of Patrick Shanahan as deputy defense secretary this week. The move gives another company — this time, Boeing — a voice inside the administration. The Hill notes that “Shanahan has been Boeing’s senior vice president for supply chain and operations since April.” On Boeing’s website, Shanahan enjoys a lengthy bio that states he “was vice president and general manager of Boeing Missile Defense Systems, starting in December 2004.” He held that position, one based out of Washington DC, until 2007, and worked in the company in various positions for years before assuming that role.


Boeing has a longstanding relationship with the government as a leading supplier of military aircraft, and they’ve spent a great deal of money on lobbyists ($17 million in 2016) to ensure that their relationship with the Pentagon is strong, regardless of who is in the White House.


On Twitter, the president previously criticized government deals with Boeing. In December, he wrote, “Boeing is building a brand new 747 Air Force One for future presidents, but costs are out of control, more than $4 billion. Cancel order!” However, he has also praised the company. In February, he visited a Boeing plant in South Carolina where he declared, “[W]e are looking seriously at a big order…the problem is that [Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg] is a very, very tough negotiator, but I think we may get it.”


Earlier this week, Trump unveiled his budget, which among other things, proposed a $54 million increase in military spending. That weighty investment could spell a big payday for industries like Boeing, and while there will likely be plenty of lobbying before the budget is finalized, companies like Boeing, Exxon, and Goldman Sachs each have inside men and are likely to continue to enjoy loud voices in Washington D.C. — without paying the president a dime.


Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo

Sunday, January 15, 2017

Trump Team Will Not Attend Davos: "Would Betray Populist-Fueled Movement"

One of the reasons behind the first ever visit by a Chinese president to next week"s Davos boondoggle is that, as reported last week, president Xi was open to a meeting with US president-elect Donald Trump’s team, if clearly not the president-elect himself, who will be far busier on January 20 - the day the World Economic Forum in Davos ends - getting inaugurated.


“China has good contacts with the present US government, and also has a smooth communication channel with Trump’s team,” deputy foreign minister Li Baodong said on Wednesday. Li was responding to a query on the possibility of a meeting between President Xi Jinping and Trump’s team members when they attend the World Economic Forum in Davos from January 17 to 20, according to SCMP.



However, while the world"s elite eats "$43 Hot Dogs; $47 Burgers And $55 Caesar Salads", Xi will have to do without a close encounter with members of Trump"s, because as Bloomberg reports, "Trump won’t send an official representative to the annual gathering of the world’s economic elite in Davos, taking place next week in the days leading up to his inauguration." The stated reason by a senior member of Trump’s transition team is that "the president-elect thought it would betray his populist-fueled movement to have a presence at the high-powered annual gathering in the Swiss Alps."


During the campaign Trump labeled his opponent Hillary Clinton, as “a globalist” and portrayed himself as a champion for the working class fighting an unfair economic system. Since the election, Trump, who will be the nation’s first billionaire president, has nominated for his Cabinet two billionaires and about a dozen millionaires.


And yet, the gathering of millionaires, billionaires, political leaders and celebrities "represents the power structure that fueled the populist anger that helped Trump win the election", said the person, who Bloomberg said asked for anonymity to discuss the matter. Amusingly, it also leads to such Bloomberg articles as "Davos Wonders If It’s Part of the Problem" (spoiler alert: yes). Additionally, former Goldman Sachs President Gary Cohn, a regular attendee in the past, told the group he would skip 2017 after being named in December to head the National Economic Council. Other top Trump appointees will also pass up the forum.


And yet, there are several reasons to be just a little skeptical of Trump"s adherence to his "populist-fueled movement." One is tweets like the following:



Another is that while no Trump member will be there officially, unofficially at least two people from Trump"s immediate orbit will be dancing with the DJs late in the night. One is SkyBridge"s Anthony Scaramucci, who is planning to travel to Davos.The early backer of Trump’s campaign, Scaramucci was named on Thursday as an assistant to the president.





Scaramucci, who has attended the forum several times, made plans before being selected for the White House team and is traveling in an unofficial capacity, said Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks. The forum schedule lists him on a Jan. 17 panel that will cover “the priorities, challenges and opportunities for the incoming government of the United States,” and identifies him as an executive member of Trump’s transition team.



“Anthony Scaramucci has been a long-standing participant at the annual meeting, and as such has been registered to attend since last spring,” Paul Smyke, head of the North America World Economic Forum, said in a statement. Scaramucci will depart in time to attend Trump’s swearing-in on Jan. 20.


Additionally, Trump"s close political adviser Rebekah Mercer is also registered to attend. A major Republican donor, Mercer is a member of Trump’s transition team and has been influential in helping to hire senior staff, but doesn’t have an official role in the incoming administration, opting to work behind the scenes. Rebekah is, of course, wife of Bob Mercer, co-CEO of Renaissance Technologies, which as we profiled last August was "perfectly hedged" between Mercer, who funded and spearheded the Trump campaign on one hand, and RenTec"s chain-smoking billionaire founder Jim Simons, who together with George Soros, was one of the most generous sponsors of the Clinton campaign.


* * *


Meanwhile, as the Trump team stays away, if only "officially", China"s Xi is set to become the first Chinese president to attend the forum, bringing with him a contingent of China’s wealthiest executives. China is casting itself as an advocate of globalization, in contrast to Trump’s “America First” platform critical of free-trade deals. According to Reuters, during his visit, Xi Jinping will promote "inclusive globalization" and will warn that populist approaches can lead to "war and poverty."


Jiang Jianguo, head of the State Council Information Office, told a symposium hosted by the World Trade Organization in Geneva that President Xi would go to Davos to push for development, cooperation and economic globalization in order to build "a human community with shared destiny." "With the rise of populism, protectionism, and nativism, the world has come to a historic crossroad where one road leads to war, poverty, confrontation and domination while the other road leads to peace, development, cooperation and win-win solutions," Jiang said.



Xi will join about 3,000 others, who will include U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May, outgoing U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and South African President Jacob Zuma.  The forum wraps up on Trump’s Inauguration Day.


This year"s forum is expected to be dominated by discussion of a surge in public hostility toward globalization and the rise of Trump, whose tough talk on trade, including promises of tariffs against China and Mexico, helped win him the White House. Previously, we laid out the top risks envisioned by the WEF in 2017, and which will be topic of much discussion by those present. They are summarized in the chart below.


Monday, January 2, 2017

Angela Merkel To Skip Davos Amid Blowback Against "Global Elite"

Last week we were surprised to learn that demand for hotel rooms at the annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, where the world"s billionaires, CEOs, politicians, celebrities and oligarchs mingle every year (while regaled by their public relations teams known as the "media", for whom getting an invite to the DJ event du jour is more important than rocking the boat by asking unpleasant questions) was so great, not only are hotel rooms running out, but local employees may be put up in shipping containers in car parks to free up much needed accommodations.


This scramble to attend what has traditionally been perceived as the hangout for those who have benefited the most from "peak globalization" was in some ways surprising: coming after a year in which "populism" emerged as a dominant global force, while sending establishment politics, legacy policies and even globalization reeling, the message - in terms of lessons learned from 2016 - sent to the masses from the world"s 0.1% was hardly enlightened.


However, while most Davos participants remain tone deaf, one person has gotten the message loud and clear.


According to Reuters, German Chancellor Angela Merkel - who faces a crucial election this year as she runs for her 4th term as German chancellor amid sagging approval ratings - is steering clear of the World Economic Forum in Davos, a meeting expected to be dominated by debate over the looming presidency of Donald Trump "and rising public anger with elites and globalization", which is ironic because just two years prior, the topic was rising wealth inequality which the world"s billionaires blasted, lamented and, well, got even richer as nothing at all changed.



What is surprising about Merkel"s absence in 2017 is that the Chancellor has been a regular at the annual gathering of political leaders, CEOs and celebrities, traveling to the snowy resort in the Swiss Alps seven times since becoming chancellor in 2005. But her spokesman told Reuters she had decided not to attend for a second straight year.


This year"s conference runs from Jan. 17-20 under the banner "Responsive and Responsible Leadership". Trump"s inauguration coincides with the last day of the conference.


"It"s true that a Davos trip was being considered, but we never confirmed it, so this is not a cancellation," the spokesman said.


Reuters adds that this is the first time Merkel has missed Davos two years in a row since taking office over 11 years ago and her absence may come as a disappointment to the organizers because her reputation as a steady, principled leader fits well with the theme of this year"s conference.


There was little additional information behind her continued absencea the government spokesman declined to say what scheduling conflict was preventing her from attending, nor would it say whether the decision might be linked to the truck attack on a Berlin Christmas market that killed 12 people in mid-December.


The reason for her absence, however, may be far more prosaic: as Reuters echoes what we said previously, "after the Brexit vote in Britain and the election of Trump were attributed to rising public anger with the political establishment and globalization, leaders may be more reluctant than usual to travel to a conference at a plush ski resort that has become synonymous with the global elite."


Another potential complication is that this year"s Davod event concludes just hours before Trump"s inauguration. As a result, one European official suggested to Reuters that "the prospect of having to address questions about Trump days before he enters the White House might also have dissuaded Merkel, whose politics is at odds with the president-elect on a broad range of issues, from immigration and trade, to Russia and climate change."


During the U.S. election campaign, Trump described Merkel"s refugee policies as "insane". Like Merkel, French President Francois Hollande, who announced in early December that he would not seek a second term next year, will not be in Davos.


Most other European political leaders are expected to be present, despite the furious changes in Europe"s political landscape in the past year: the Forum had hoped to lure Matteo Renzi, but he resigned as Italian prime minister last month. European leaders that are expected include Mark Rutte of the Netherlands and Enda Kenny of Ireland. British Prime Minister Theresa May could also be there.


German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen, who was elected to the WEF board of trustees last year, is expected to attend, as are senior ministers from a range of other European countries, as well as top figures from the European Commission.


Members of Donald Trump"s team, including Davos regulars like former Goldman Sachs president Gary Cohn and fund manager Anthony Scaramucci, are also expected. Reuters reminds us that WEF Chairman Klaus Schwab was invited to Trump Tower last month, although the purpose of the visit was unclear.


Although the WEF does not comment on which leaders it is expecting until roughly a week before the meeting, the star attraction is expected to be Xi Jinping, the first Chinese president to attend. Meanwhile, it is was highly unlikely that the one person everyone would like to seek answers from at Davos, Russian president Vladimir Putin, will be present.