Showing posts with label hunger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hunger. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Socialism: Child Gangs Fight For ‘Quality Garbage’ With Machetes In Venezuela


While many politicians and civilians in the United States focus on making the country a socialist regime, Venezuela’s children are forming gangs and using machetes to fight each other for “quality garbage” so they have something to eat.


Socialism is only good for those already at the very top.  It’s a very important lesson for anyone seeking to “remove the wealth” from the 1%.  Never assume that the rich will allow you vote their money away in the first place. The other issue most socialists forget that the 1% is made up the very wealthy politicians from both parties who will profit immensely from the implementation of socialism.  Of course, when that does happen children starve and become violent as a means to survive and have just one more meal.



The Miami Herald has detailed the lives of children forced to live under the harsh realities of socialism. Liliana, at the age of only 16, has become the mother figure for a gang of Venezuelan children and young adults called the Chacao, named after the neighborhood they’ve claimed as their territory. The 15 members, ranging in age from 10 to 23, work together to survive vicious fights for “quality” garbage in crumbling, shortage-plagued, socialist dystopia of Venezuela. Their weapons are knives and sticks and machetes. And their only prize is garbage that contains food scrapes barely good enough to eat.


Many of the children in the Chacao gang flock to a life of violence but a family-oriented one because there’s no other option if they want to eat.  There are at least 10 gangs in the capital of Caracas according to social workers and police estimate. “There were always children on the street in Venezuela but now we are seeing a new phenomenon — kids who get more food on the street than at their homes,” says Beatriz Tirado, who leads “Angeles de Calle,” or Street Angels, a non-governmental charity.


“Our kids are finding ways to survive because neither in their homes nor in their communities is there enough food,” explains social worker Roberto Patino, who has established 29 public diners all over the country to feed the massive numbers of hungry children. But Patino also bemoans that there are not enough resources to help the children get their lives back on track let alone feed them properly. For now, many have turned to trash bags as a source of nutrition.


But the gang life is dangerous for the children. Often, they venture into the more affluent neighborhoods of the politicians. One of those territories is Las Mercedes. It has high-end restaurants that attract the political elite Venezuelans. Because garbage bags there often contain leftovers and even untouched food, they are sought after by a number of the gangs. The clashes over bags of trash can be deadly.


The children often take to the consumption of street drugs at an early age as well.  They become criminals, tossing the law out the window to survive.  They steal, assault people, and use drugs like crack, sometimes smoked in makeshift pipes made from the parts of discarded plastic dolls, but for a very disturbing reason. “When you smoke you don’t feel hungry,” explains Patricio.


The few failures of capitalism are much preferable to the few success of socialism. Although one can argue that there haven’t been any successes with regards to socialism unless you count the lining of the pockets of the politicians who rule over everyone else.

Monday, January 29, 2018

The Importance Of Prepping: Alaskans Turn To Government For Food Amid Recession

foodstamps


Tens of thousands of people have turned to the government for healthcare and food amid Alaska’s recession, prompting questions from state lawmakers about the sustainability of those “safety-net” programs. Simple state-wide recessions such as Alaska’s highlight the importance of being prepared.


According to Alaskan Governor Bill Walker’s administration, the estimates are 240,000 people will be enrolled in the Medicaid health-care program next year, up from 163,000 in 2015. And 101,000 Alaskans were receiving food stamps in September, up from 72,000 a year earlier, according to preliminary federal data. Although the federal government covers most of the cost of Alaska’s food stamp program, Medicaid is supported by both the state and federal governments and is one of the biggest line-items in Alaska’s budget, at about $700 million. And some conservative lawmakers say they’re worried about the growth in enrollment.


Anti-hunger advocates want to see adequate budgets for their government programs rather than rely on the free market. They also oppose making it more difficult for people to qualify for assistance programs given how many Alaskans are struggling, said Sarra Khlifi, program manager at the Alaska Food Coalition.


Khlifi said her members — social service organizations focused on fighting hunger and its causes — have been noticing more consistent demand, instead of in the past when clients arrived at the end of the month after using up their food stamps.


But higher taxes to fund government programs only force those living paycheck to paycheck to also enter into these very programs, which were supposed to be designed to eliminate hunger. It’s the vicious cycle of a government attempt to fix a problem they started. But simply storing canned foods can be a good start to prepare for a recession.


Due to the overwhelming nature of preparedness, it can be difficult to simply begin the journey. But as we all know, anything can happen, and when it does, we could benefit from having extra food on hand.


preppers-blueprint


Recessions, such as the one Alaskans are experiencing, dictate the importance of a backup plan. Being prepared to the best of your ability rather than relying on the dwindling funds from government programs will give someone the best chance at survival without putting yourself at the mercy of the state. Great references exist to help anyone prepare for any situation.

Friday, December 15, 2017

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

World"s First Vending-Machine For The Homeless To Be Unveiled In UK In December; LA, NYC Next Year

This is a first, a new charity in the UK called Action Hunger plans to install a vending machine for the homeless in December. The organization describes itself as a charity with a “new approach to combating homelessness.” The initial plan will be installing a machine in the town of Nottingham in the December time-period, then a second machine in Manchester sometime early 2018. If all goes well, Action Hunger plans to do a full release across the UK in attempt to alleviate poverty and hardships– something the government is having trouble in doing.



Action Hunger is working with Tesco and other partners to stock the machines with water, fresh fruit, energy bars, crisps, chocolate, and sandwiches, as well as socks, sanitary towels, antibacterial lotion, toothbrush and toothpaste combination packs, and books. A majority of the food will be provided by a localized network of regional food vendors who will donate excessive food waste.


The charity has partnered with The Friary, an outreached centre in the city, to oversee the people’s access to the vending machines. The machines will operate 24-hours a day accessed by a special card given out by the Friary and can service up to 100 homeless people per day. Key cards are programmed to permit up to three items per day, which offers a low-cost automated solution in dealing with the poor.


Action Hunger explains how the process works: 



According to the Independent, homelessness has increased 34% per cent since the Conservatives came to power in 2010, partly due to benefit cuts and welfare changes. A new study reveals that 300,000 people in Britain are now homeless, with the crisis growing as much as 13 per cent last year alone.


Number of rough sleepers across England on a given night



Number of homelessness applications made to local authorities



Action Hunger is targeting Nottingham and Manchester, two areas where homelessness is out of control.



Across England, housing market affordability is once again above 2006 to 2008 levels— signaling that house prices are once more outpacing income.



Besides the exploding homelessness situation in the UK, there is an even larger market in the United States, where Action Hunger will be installing the vending machines next year in Seattle, New York, and LA.


In August, we reported 1 in 7 New York City Public-School students is homeless. On top of that, NYC shelter officials have admitted a record number of homeless to shelters each night.



In a preview of things to come, automation in the form of vending machines seems to be the short term solution in dealing with the homeless in the UK. The next step for Action Hunger appears to be a multi-city rollout in the United States targeting a much larger homeless population as the middle class deteriorates.


For our American audience, an automated vending machine for the homeless is coming to a town near you. The dying middle class will no longer be able to shop at the Dollar Tree nor Walmart, as they will resort to automated vending machines. The future is bleak.









Wednesday, November 22, 2017

The Psychology Of Desperate People: 15 Dead, 40 Injured In Food Stampede In Morocco

Authored by Daisy Luther via The Organic Prepper blog,


In prepper lore, there is a theory about how badly desperate people are likely to behave.


Many folks outside the community scoff at this theory. They believe that we have become more civilized than to utilize violent measures when hunger strikes.


But an incident in Morocco the other day showed us exactly how hungry people behave.



And it isn’t pretty.


Food was being distributed in a rural market in Sidi Boulaalam, a poor village. Women had come to the market with baskets to get food for their families, when suddenly, what could only be described as a stampede erupted.


 


At least 15 women died and five were wounded in a stampede during a food distribution operation on Sunday morning in rural Morocco, government officials said.


 


The victims were crushed as hundreds of people, mostly women, gathered to collect baskets of food at the market…


 


…In the aftermath of the stampede, clothes and other personal items were left scattered across the ground. (source)



That number was later updated to 40 people who were injured in the crush.


Witnesses told local media that this year’s annual food aid distribution at a local market in Sidi Boulaalam, an impoverished town with just over 8,000 inhabitants, attracted a larger crowd than usual.


 


“This year there were lots of people, several hundred people,” a witness who asked to remain anonymous told AFP news agency.


 


“People shoved, they broke down the barriers,” he said, adding that the injured had been evacuated to a hospital in Marrakesh. (source)



Here’s a video of the aftermath in this Tweet. (If it won’t play for you, go here.)



The value of the food being handed out? $16


15 families were left without mothers over $16 of food. To be fair, villagers in that part of the world live on about $3 per day, but still – this shows what desperation can do.


It’s not just Morocco.


It happens somewhere in the world every day. Here are some acts of desperation that have happened just in recent months.


When you are desperate, the normal rules do not apply.


Every year, we get a glimpse of this kind of insanity in America


Every year, on “Black Friday” we get a glimpse of the kind of behavior that causes people to be crushed to death and assaulted. The day after Thanksgiving (ironically) people get up before daylight, stand in line, and shove their way through a crowd to get the best deals. (Stay tuned this weekend for the 2017 Black Friday Hall of Shame.)


And they aren’t even hungry.


People climb all over each other for cheap electronics. Fistfights erupt over vegetable steamers. People are ready to throw down and do battle for sale priced bath towels and televisions.



I’d hazard a guess that folks who spend time and money fighting over electronics are not the kind of people who prep. That means that these are the people who will be hungry in a long-term disaster.  Look at those people, stampeding to get to a sale on things that they don’t actually need to survive. Their inhibitions are loosened because those around them are behaving in the same way.


You have to look at the psychology of this.


People can justify pretty much anything when they or their children are starving. And I can understand that to a large degree – who could stand to watch their babies suffering?  But if someone can devolve to the above degree just to because everyone else is doing it, the chaos we saw above is only a tiny sample of what could come if people were truly hungry.


The line between civilization and THIS is very thin.


Desperate people do desperate things.


We need to be prepared by having the essential supplies on hand to keep us from becoming one of those desperate people in the middle of a stampede for a few days’ worth of food, but what’s more, we need to be prepared for the prospect of those desperate people. Keeping a low profile is the best defense but sometimes it’s not enough.


In a desperate situation, you have to be ready for desperate people to behave in a desperate manner. It happens in real life all the time. Somewhere on this planet, someone is desperate and they will do anything to meet their needs.


It only takes one person to start the charge in a tense scenario, and when that happens, the others will follow.


Don’t count on the rules of “civilization” to save you.









Thursday, September 28, 2017

Dark Humor From Socialist Hellhole Venezuela

Authored by Daniel Mitchell via The Foundation for Economic Education,


Back in 2015, I mocked Venezuelan socialism because it led to shortages of just about every product. Including toilet paper.


But maybe that doesn’t matter. After all, if people don’t have anything to eat, they probably don’t have much need to visit the bathroom.


The Washington Post reports that farmers are producing less and less food because of government intervention, even though the nation is filled with hungry people.





Venezuela, whose economy operates on its own special plane of dysfunction. At a time of empty supermarkets and spreading hunger, the country’s farms are producing less and less, not more, making the caloric deficit even worse. Drive around the countryside outside the capital, Caracas, and there’s everything a farmer needs: fertile land, water, sunshine and gasoline at 4 cents a gallon, cheapest in the world. Yet somehow families here are just as scrawny-looking as the city-dwelling Venezuelans waiting in bread lines or picking through garbage for scraps.



 …“Last year I had 200,000 hens,” said Saulo Escobar, who runs a poultry and hog farm here in the state of Aragua, an hour outside Caracas. “Now I have 70,000.” Several of his cavernous henhouses sit empty because, Escobar said, he can’t afford to buy more chicks or feed. Government price controls have made his business unprofitable…the country is facing a dietary calamity. With medicines scarce and malnutrition cases soaring, more than 11,000 babies died last year, sending the infant mortality rate up 30 percent, according to Venezuela’s Health Ministry.



…Child hunger in parts of Venezuela is a “humanitarian crisis,” according to a new report by the Catholic relief organization Caritas, which found 11.4 percent of children under age 5 suffering from moderate to severe malnutrition… In a recent survey of 6,500 Venezuelan families by the country’s leading universities, three-quarters of adults said they lost weight in 2016 — an average of 19 pounds. This collective emaciation is referred to dryly here as “the Maduro diet,” but it’s a level of hunger almost unheard-of… Venezuela’s disaster is man-made, economists point out — the result of farm nationalizations, currency distortions and a government takeover of food distribution. …The price controls have become a powerful disincentive in rural Venezuela. “There are no profits, so we produce at a loss,” said one dairy farmer.



Here’s where we get to the economics lesson. When producers aren’t allowed to profit, they don’t produce.


And when we’re looking at the production of food, that means hungry people.


Even the left-wing Guardian in the U.K. has noticed.





Hunger is gnawing at Venezuela, where a government that claims to rule for the poorest has left most of its 31 million people short of food, many desperately so.



…Adriana Velásquez gets ready for work, heading out into an uncertain darkness as she has done since hunger forced her into the only job she could find at 14. She was introduced to her brothel madam by a friend more than two years ago after her mother, a single parent, was fired and the two ran out of food. “It was really hard, but we were going to bed without eating,” said the teenager, whose name has been changed to protect her.



…Venezuela’s crisis has deepened, the number of women working at the brothel has doubled, and their ages have dropped. “I was the youngest when I started. Now there are girls who are 12 or 13. Almost all of us are there because of the crisis, because of hunger.” She earns 400,000 bolivares a month, around four times the minimum wage, but at a time of hyperinflation that is now worth about $30, barely enough to feed herself, her mother and a new baby brother.



This is truly sad.


Our leftist friends like to concoct far-fetched theories of how prostitution is enabled by everything from low taxes to global warming.


In the real world, however, socialism drives teenage girls (or even younger) to work in brothels.


That’s such a depressing thought that let’s shift the topic back to hunger and toilet paper.


Especially since Venezuela’s dictator is bragging that the nation’s toilet paper shortage has been solved!



This is definitely a dark version of satire.


But Venezuela is such a mess that it’s hard to know where to draw the line between mockery and reality.


For instance, here’s another “benefit” of limited food. If you don’t eat, it’s not as necessary to brush your teeth.


And in the socialist paradise of Venezuela, that makes a virtue out of necessity since – surprise – there’s a shortage of toothpaste.


The Washington Post has the grim details.





Ana Margarita Rangel…spends everything she earns to fend off hunger. Her shoes are tattered and torn, but she cannot afford new ones. A tube of toothpaste costs half a week’s wages.



“I’ve always loved brushing my teeth before going to sleep I mean, that’s the rule, right?” said Rangel, …“Now I have to choose,” she said. “So I do it only in the mornings.” …The government sets price caps on some basic food items, such as pasta, rice and flour.



…those items can usually be obtained only by standing in lines for hours or by signing up to receive a subsidized monthly grocery box from the government… Since 2014, the proportion of Venezuelan families in poverty has soared from 48 percent to 82 percent…



Fifty-two percent of families live in extreme poverty, according to the survey, and about 31 percent survive on two meals per day at most.



Isn’t socialism wonderful! You have the luxury of choosing between two meals a day, or one meal a day plus toothpaste!


By the way, the central planners have a plan.


Though it won’t make Bugs Bunny happy.


Rabbit is now on the menu! Here are some excerpts from a CNN report.





Let them eat rabbits. That was basically the message from President Nicolas Maduro to Venezuelans starving and struggling through severe food shortages… 


 


The Venezuelan leaders…recommend that people raise rabbits at home as a source of food.


 


…The agriculture minister argued that rabbits easily reproduce and are a source of protein. He also recommended citizens consider raising and growing other animals and vegetables at home. It’s just the latest attempt to try and solve the food shortage problem. The government forces citizens to pick up groceries on certain days of the week depending on social security numbers.



Gee, isn’t this wonderful. The government cripples markets so they can’t function and then advocates people live like medieval peasants.


Maybe there should be price controls on clothing, along with having the government in charge of distribution. That will wreck that market as well, so people can make their own clothes out of rabbit pelts.


I wonder whether a certain American lawmaker is rethinking his praise of Venezuelan economic policy?



Based on what he said as recently as last year, the answer is no.

Saturday, August 26, 2017

Mindful Eating Shown to Help People Lose Weight

If you mindlessly watch TV, you could easily wind up wasting the entire day. If you mindlessly drive, you could wind up getting lost, or worse. Likewise, mindlessly eating will cause you to gain weight, especially if the food is void of nutrition. The exact opposite is also true, a study foundgiving your full attention to the food in front of you can lead to weight loss[1]


Carolyn Dunn, a professor and nutrition specialist at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, and a team of colleagues evaluated the effectiveness of increasing mindful eating in an online weight loss program called Eat Smart, Move More, Weigh Less (ESMMWL).


The 15-week program, developed by NC State University and the NC Division of Public Health, uses the concept of “planned behavior” to help participants alter habits that are associated with weight management. Participants are invited to focus on their relationships and interactions with food, including paying attention to how it tastes, tuning into feelings of hunger and fullness, and planning mealtimes and snacks. [2]


Source: The Huffington Post

With mindful eating, participants don’t have to give up high-calorie foods. Instead, they are encouraged to take 2 or 3 bites, and “just savor the flavor.” You can eat whatever you want, but there’s one caveat: You must focus on nothing but enjoying your food. [1]


Read: Scientists Prove you can Think Your Way to Wellness


Dunn explained:



“For example, if one of us was going to eat a food that has very high calories, we would tell them to eat one or two bites, but to eat those one or two bites with awareness, so they are getting the most pleasure out of those one to two bites.” [2]



She went on:




“Mindfulness is paying attention to your surroundings, being in the present moment.


Mindful eating is eating with purpose, eating with awareness, eating without distraction, when eating only eating, not watching television or playing computer games or having any other distractions, not eating at our desks.”



Past research shows that the first 2 bites of food provide the most enjoyment, and eating more just leads to more calorie consumption, but not more enjoyment.


Really, mindful eating doesn’t begin at mealtime, it begins before you even start cooking. Mindfulness involves the way you shop for food, and the choices you make in restaurants.


Read: 5 Tips to “Trick Yourself” into Eating Less and Eating Healthier


Dunn said:



“Are you letting your emotions drive your eating? Are you eating out of fear or depression? Are you letting external cues drive your eating because you are in line in the grocery store and that food is being heavily marketed to us?”



To see what kind of impact mindful eating had on participants’ weight-loss efforts, researchers had them complete a questionnaire, called the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ), which assesses 5 different areas of mindful eating. [1]


Those who enrolled in the ESMMWL program were invited to participate in the randomized clinical trial portion of the study. Of the 80 people who agreed to participate, 42 were randomly assigned to the intervention group, and the remaining 38 people were assigned to the control group. [2]


The researchers found that participants who completed the program lost more weight than those in the control group. On average, the volunteers in the mindfulness group lost 4.2 lbs. compared to 0.7 lbs. in the control group – a result the team called “statistically significant.” [1]


After 6 months, about 75% of the participants had not regained the weight they lost in the program, and someone even lost additional weight. [2]


When the control group finally got the opportunity to participate in the program, they saw similar results.


The team concluded:



“Results suggest that there is a beneficial association between mindful eating and weight loss. The current study contributes to the mindfulness literature as there are very few studies that employed rigorous methodology to examine the effectiveness of an intervention on mindful eating.” [3]



Sources:


[1] Medical News Today


[2] Pulse Headlines


[3] The Guardian


The Huffington Post



Storable Food





About Julie Fidler:
Author Image
Julie Fidler is a freelance writer, legal blogger, and the author of Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or the Absolute Worst. She lives in Pennsylvania with her husband and two ridiculously spoiled cats. She occasionally pontificates on her blog.

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Yemen Decimated by Cholera, Hunger and War

Yemen Decimated by Cholera, Hunger and War | yemen-physical-map-1024x692 | Special Interests World News [image: World Maps]In Yemen, the cholera epidemic is out of control. It already affects 300,000 people while 1,700 Yemenis have lost their lives.


The current epidemic is the culmination of a catastrophic situation, which includes a plunge into a war – for more than two years – since March 2015.


Civil confrontation faces pro-government forces and Hutu rebels.


This battle cannot be understood in its amplitude without taking into account the fact that powerful Saudi Arabia, as a proxy US actor, and Iran, also measure their forces in the poorest Middle East country.



Riyadh leads a so-called coalition that supports the Sunni government and Tehran supports the Shi’ite rebels. The fatricidal struggle between Shiites and Sunnis is at the origin of the conflict.


At this juncture, the civilian population is subjected to atrocious survival conditions.


The displaced, who have had to leave their homes or be bombed to death, are counted by the thousands. Along with war, or because of war, the levels of malnutrition are very high.


In April, the UN spoke of “the greatest crisis of hunger on the planet” – and how the infrastructure of the country, especially sanitation, is destroyed.


“Land for cholera”, explains Roger Gutiérrez, intervention coordinator of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in Abs, Yemen’s rural district most affected by the epidemic.


Gutierrez spent seven months in the area putting up the MSF hospital bombed by the US-led coalition and warning that cholera “is out of control.”


The latest figures, provided by the International Committee of the Red Cross, are 300,000 people affected and 1,700 dead due to the rampant epidemic.


Cholera is a disease caused by a virus found in contaminated water.


Its treatment is simple and with surprising results – hydration of the patient who can lose 25 litrers of fluids daily as a result of diarrhea and vomiting – but, similarly, if not treated, the mortality rate is very high.


One in two people dies if they do not receive treatment. The symptoms are very acute and the intervention should be immediate.


“It is urgent to have more means and dedication to eradicate the disease,” warns the coordinator of MSF for which the Yemeni situation is, at the moment, the “worst humanitarian crisis” in the world.


His opinion is supported by figures: more than 19 million people or 70% of the population are in need of help. “The levels of malnutrition,” warns Gutierrez, “are unprecedented.”


As for cholera in particular, it is necessary to increase the supply of drinking water and sanitation activities.


MSF explains that it is precisely the lack of water and the poor state of the pipeline system and drains that are facilitating the spread of the disease.


The communities most affected are those living in remote areas, forcing those affected to travel tens of kilometers to the nearest health center.


In addition to caring for patients, it is necessary to have people’s homes disinfected and water supplies be chlorinated.



“Potable water distribution points should be set up,” he adds, “and places where people gather, such as markets and bus stations, should be disinfected regularly.”



Apart from cholera, MSF teams have detected a significant increase in the number of emergency consultations, many for children, and surgical interventions.


Outbreaks of measles, whooping cough and malaria, diseases supposedly eradicated, have reappeared again.



“It is a clear sign that the Yemeni health system, suffering from lack of resources and personnel, is collapsed,” according to MSF.



The country’s health officials, some of whom do not charge, are making efforts to continue serving their fellow citizens at the height of the crisis, but the effort is not enough at the moment.


Meanwhile, those responsible for inciting war and conflict among locals are not held responsible for their crimes against Yemen.


The United States just agreed to provide the Saudis with a large cache of weapons, which will be sent to Yemen, where the US and Iran iron out their differences on a “neutral” battlefield, just as the US and Russia did in Afghanistan, Cuba and now in Syria.

Monday, April 3, 2017

A Record 67% Of Low-Income Americans Are Worried "A Great Deal" About Hunger And Homelessness

Something unexpected happened on the road to Obama"s economic "recovery" - according to Gallup, over the past two years, a record two-thirds, or an average of 67% of lower-income U.S. adults, up from 51% from 2010-2011, have worried "a great deal" about the problem of hunger and homelessness in the country. They are not alone: concern has also increased among middle- and upper-income Americans, but they still worry far less than do lower-income Americans.



Some details: since 2001, worry has been highest among those residing in lower-income households, likely because those with limited financial resources are more at risk of going hungry or becoming homeless. A consistent majority of lower-income adults worried about the problem before 2012, but that has only increased in the past five years. Concern among middle-income Americans in 2016-2017 falls just short of the majority level at 47%, while 37% of upper-income Americans are worried.


Rising concern among all income groups could be a result of the political and media attention devoted to U.S. income inequality in recent years. Americans may also worry more about hunger and homelessness when other issues are not dominating the national consciousness, such as the economy and budget deficit were in 2010-2011 and terrorism was in the years after 9/11.


Overall, 47% of Americans now worry about hunger and homelessness "a great deal," according to Gallup"s March 1-5 survey, tied with 2016 as the high in the trend. Previously, concern had been as low as 35% in 2004 and as high as 45% in 2001, the first year Gallup asked the question.



Concern about hunger and homelessness now ranks as high as, or higher than, concern about most other issues tested in Gallup"s annual Environment survey. The only issue with a significantly higher "worried a great deal" percentage in this year"s poll is the availability and affordability of healthcare, at 57%.


But among lower-income Americans, hunger and homelessness eclipses healthcare, making it the top-ranking issue of the 13 tested in the March 1-5 survey. Among middle- and upper-income Americans, the availability and affordability of healthcare generates the greatest worry, with hunger further down the list.


Crime and violence, as well as healthcare, also are prominent concerns for lower-income Americans. Crime is a prominent concern for middle-income Americans as well, but much less so for upper-income Americans. It does not rank among upper-income Americans" top concerns.



Lower-income Americans do tend to worry more about all of these problems than do those with higher incomes. On average, across the 13 issues, the percentage of lower-income adults who worry a great deal is seven percentage points higher than among middle-income Americans, and 17 points higher than among upper-income Americans.


But differences in concern about hunger and homelessness far exceed those norms. In fact, the 20-point difference in worry about hunger and homelessness between lower-income and middle-income Americans is higher than for any of the other issues. Similarly, the 30-point difference in worry about hunger and homelessness between lower-income and upper-income Americans ties for the highest, along with concern about crime and violence.


What, according to Gallup, are the Implications?


Americans at all income levels are expressing greater concern about hunger and homelessness, and it is the top worry among lower-income Americans, who are most likely to struggle to pay for adequate food and housing.


Curiously Gallup says that "it is unclear why Americans are worrying more about hunger and homelessness now, since it is an ever-present problem" although one can make some educated assumptions.


The polling compny the notes that "at times the issue may fade from public consciousness when other matters dominate the national agenda. It is possible that greater concern will lead to greater public pressure for action on the issue. However, President Donald Trump"s first federal budget has been criticized for deep cuts to federal anti-poverty programs. If Trump"s budget passes largely as it has been outlined, then state and local governments, charitable organizations and private citizens would need to increase their efforts to help reduce poverty and its effects -- or hope that the president"s economic policies expand opportunities for the most financially vulnerable in society."


That, or simply the economic situation for the poorest Americans - those who have virtually no savings to their name - has gotten so bad that they are worried "a great deal" because they believe they may be next...

This Economy Is Ruined For Many Americans

Authored by Wolf Richter via WolfStreet.com,


Those who lost out on the Fed’s “wealth effect.”


Here’s a mystery: Has this “wealth-effect” economy that the Fed so beautifully engineered since the Financial Crisis gotten a lot riskier, scarier, and uglier in some profound ways for lower-income Americans, those making $30,000 or less a year?


One of the questions that Gallup posed was this:





Next, I’m going to read a list of problems facing the country. For each one, please tell me if you personally worry about this problem a great deal, a fair amount, only a little, or not at all? First, how much do you personally worry about –



Then came 13 issues, including “hunger and homelessness.”


Turns out, among Americans making $30,000 or less a year, 67% worry “a great deal” about hunger and homelessness! Food and shelter, two of the most basic human needs. That’s the highest percentage ever in Gallup’s data series on this question going back to 2001.


It’s up from 52% in 2001/2004; up from 56% in 2007/2008; and up from 51% in 2010/2011.


Median annual household income in February was $58,714, according to Sentier Research. On an inflation-adjusted basis, this was about flat with February 2016 and below February 2000. Median income means 50% make more and 50% make less. Other studies have shown that incomes have risen sharply at the upper end of the spectrum, but have fallen at the lower end, with the gap widening. Thus the median might have stagnated, but for many of those below the median, things haven’t turned out so well. And there are a lot of them!


With the prices of stocks, homes, art, classic cars, commercial real estate, and the like inflated to dizzying heights after eight years of radical monetary policies, why would these folks, making $30,000 or less – worry more than ever about such basic and dreadful conditions?


More on that in a moment. There are other elements in this mystery: Even among people making $30,000 to $75,000, a record 47% worry “a great deal” about hunger and homelessness, up from 40% in 2010-2011. And even among high-income Americans, the percentage, though small, has risen (chart by Gallup):



Rising worries about hunger and homelessness can have a number of causes, including media coverage of those topics, or coverage of rising income and wealth inequality in America. In its survey report, Gallup points out that occasionally, when something terrible happens, such as 9/11, it might be “dominating the national consciousness,” and hunger and homelessness recede as primary concerns.


We get that. But Gallup goes on:





Since 2001, worry has been highest among those residing in lower-income households, likely because those with limited financial resources are more at risk of going hungry or becoming homeless. A consistent majority of lower-income adults worried about the problem before 2012, but that has only increased in the past five years.



Lower-income Americans worry about basic problems, in this order:


  1. Hunger/homelessness

  2. Crime/violence

  3. Healthcare

  4. Drug use

  5. Terrorism

  6. Social Security

  7. Economy

At the upper section of the spectrum, at incomes over $75,000, things look different, in that order:


  1. Healthcare

  2. Budget deficit

  3. Economy

  4. Social Security

  5. Environment

  6. Race relations

  7. Hunger/homelessness

Lower-income Americans worry more in general than those with higher incomes. Everything is riskier and tougher for them. But nothing compares to the worries about hunger and homelessness. Gallup:





On average, across the 13 issues, the percentage of lower-income adults who worry a great deal is seven percentage points higher than among middle-income Americans, and 17 points higher than among upper-income Americans.



But differences in concern about hunger and homelessness far exceed those norms. In fact, the 20-point difference in worry about hunger and homelessness between lower-income and middle-income Americans is higher than for any of the other issues. Similarly, the 30-point difference in worry about hunger and homelessness between lower-income and upper-income Americans ties for the highest, along with concern about crime and violence.



In the dazzling glitter and excitement of soaring asset prices that central banks around the world, and particularly the Fed, have tried so hard to engineer, it’s easy to forget that not everyone has those assets, that a lot of people can’t get “rich” just sitting on inflated assets, that they have to work long hours in measly jobs just to stay one paycheck ahead of hunger and homelessness.


These Americans are paying the price for the Fed’s efforts to “heal” the housing market. The Fed has implemented elaborate strategies since 2008, among them: cutting its policy rate to near zero, embarking on QE, and bailing out banks and their richest investors, including Warren Buffett and his financial and insurance empire. In 2011, the Fed began encouraging and enabling Wall Street’s biggest private equity firms and other investors to buy up hundreds of thousands of homes out of foreclosure to push up home prices.


This has led to soaring housing costs that have by far outpaced wage growth, if any. And it made it that much harder for these Americans to stay that one paycheck ahead of hunger and homelessness. There are a lot of them. They’re consumers too. And this could be why the economy, which has been ruined for them, has since then not been able to grow at a reasonable pace.


And so, America becomes “Landlord Land.” Read…  So Who’s Pumping Up this “New Normal” Housing Market?