Showing posts with label Mnuchin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mnuchin. Show all posts

Sunday, November 19, 2017

Mnuchin On Bond-Villain Comparison: "I Guess I Should Take That As A Compliment"

Treasury Secretary and noted Hollywood producer Steven Mnuchin provoked criticisms from his political opponents after photos surfaced last week of Mnuchin and his wife Louise Linton posing with a sheet of newly printed dollar bills bearing Mnuchin’s signature.



Asked by Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace what it was like being compared with a bond villain after the photos went viral, Mnuchin said he took it as a compliment.


“I heard that. I never thought I’d be quoted as looking like a villain from the James Bond [movies]. I guess I should take that as a compliment that I look like a villain in a great, successful James Bond movie,” Mnuchin said.


 


“I was very excited about having my signature on the money and it’s something I’m very proud of being the secretary and helping the American people.”



Mnuchin said he thought nothing of it at the time the photo was taken, saying he didn’t expect it to be so widely shared on the Internet.


“I didn’t realize the pictures were public and going on the internet and viral but people have the right to do that people can do that that’s the great thing about social media today people can say what they want.”



Asked why he chose to print his signature in script instead of using cursive, Mnuchin explained that he felt his ordinary signature was too sloppy to print on US currency.



“I had a very, very messy signature that you could barely read, and I felt that since it’s going to be on the dollar bill forever that I should have a very clean signature,” Mnuchin said.



An Associated Press photographer captured Mnuchin and Linton posing with the sheet of dollar bills - the first to include Mnuchin’s signature - at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing last week, according to Politico.


After photos of the couple posing with the sheet of newly minted $1 bills went viral, twitter users poked fun at the pair"s expensive tastes, with one joking they were shopping for "bathroom mats" and another calling the sheet of bills, "their new line of luxury toilet paper."


This isn’t the first time Mnuchin and his wife have been criticized for appearing out-of-touch: The mockery comes just months after Louise Linton was roundly mocked for a tone-deaf Instagram post authored in response to criticisms of her posing next to a taxpayer funded jet.


Before that, the two were cleared after an investigation into whether they timed a flight in another taxpayer funded chartered jet to coincide with the solar eclipse that happened back in August.


The new bills are expected to enter circulation next month.









Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Yields Slide As Market Smells A Squeeze On Powell Fed Chair Chatter

Having noted earlier the 44%, or 11-year high, in short Treasury positions among all bond traders (according to the latest JPM client survey), and a record high 70% among JPM"s "active" clients, we suggested that the most likely next move in the Treasury sector is a squeeze on even the faintest news that derails the recent hawkish narrative. And, predictably if aonly for now, this morning Treasuries have ground higher, with 10-year note futures matching Asia session highs, and the yield on the 10Y sliding to session lows of 2.33%.



What about the catalyst?


It appears that the news that spooked the weaker shorts into covering this morning is a rerun of a story from Politico that contrary to last week"s speculation that noted Fed "maverick hawk" Kevin Warsh is the frontrunner to replace Janet Yellen, that honor may fall to Fed governor Jerome Powell, a far more "dovish" candidate who, unlike Warsh, has never lashed out at the Fed"s policies and who is the favored candidate of Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. As a reminder, Treasuries tumbled last week following the widely circulated report that Trump was said to meet Warsh about Fed chair position, suggesting he was the President"s preferred candidate. As Politico notes, that may not be the case:





MM spoke to a couple of other sources close to the Fed Chair selection process and they confirmed Kevin Warsh and Jerome Powell as the current front-runners with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said to be favoring Powell. That’s something of a head scratcher to outside observers of the process who did not have Powell on short-lists before the process began. Warsh was always viewed as a top contender though he does not really know President Trump.



These sources also said that Trump’s comment that he could make a decision in “two or three weeks” was not really a throwaway line and that the president really could tap someone in that short a time-frame. Or it could take a couple of months. It’s really up to the president to make a decision. The vetting process for the finalists is evidently very far along. Obviously some of the other final candidates including NEC Director Gary Cohn and current Fed Chair Janet Yellen are already heavily vetted and have all their paperwork in place.



Add to this what we noted earlier, and what Bloomberg"s Edward Bolingbroke wrote this morning, namely that as a result of the extreme short positioning in the TSY space, the "the market leaves Treasuries open for short squeeze-driven gains", and one can explain today"s sharp move lower in TSY yields.


Then again, the squeeze may be short-lived, because if one trusts the online betting market, despite the chatter of Mnuchin"s support for the "conventional" Jerome Powell, Warsh remains a distant favorite even after the Politico report, with a 42% probability of being Yellen"s replacement, more than Powell, whose latest contract has jumped to 35% (+8 on the day), with Yellen and Cohn a distant 3rd and 4th, with 18% and11% respectively. The latest rack from PredictIt:


Saturday, September 23, 2017

"The End Is Nigh"

Authored by Jeff Thomas via InternationalMan.com,


Recently, US Secretary of the Treasury Steve Mnuchin stated, "If China doesn"t follow these sanctions [against North Korea], we will put additional sanctions on them and prevent them from accessing the US and international dollar system."


By this, he meant that the US would shut China out of the SWIFT system, through which the great majority of international settlements are facilitated. In stating this, the US government is doing nothing less than threatening economic warfare against China, which would unquestionably prove catastrophic to the global economy.


This is astonishingly shortsighted, as the US can no more do without trade with China than China can do without trade with the US. Further, the US will unquestionably pressure its other trading partners (particularly the EU) to endorse and follow the sanctions. This they will not comply with, as it would serve to cut their own economic throats. The relationships between the US and their partners have been wearing thin in recent years, and the present threat against China is very likely to prove to be the final straw. The net effect would be to place the US out on an economic limb, alone.


There may be those who disagree with this premise, under the assumption that, to cut China out of the SWIFT system would destroy China"s ability to make international transactions, forcing them to cave to US demands.


However, China, Russia, and others have seen this day coming and have created their own SWIFT system, world cable network, and world banking system. All that"s needed to kick it all into gear is a major international need to bypass SWIFT. The US government has just provided that need with this threat. There would certainly be teething pains in getting the new system running on a massive scale, but the sudden worldwide need would drive the implementation.


This threat by the US at a time when it"s broke is, in effect, economic suicide.


But, just as the ink is drying on this announcement, the increasingly impetuous US president has cracked a deal with Democrats to permanently abolish the US debt ceiling. As the debt ceiling was the last safeguard in governmental fiscal responsibility, he"s effectively chosen to assure that the US will experience economic collapse.


Again, economic suicide.


It could be argued that the insatiable ego of “The Donald” has driven him to recklessness. Indeed, it"s been his habit, when opposed on anything he wishes to do, to lash out, often creating far more dangerous deals, and saying, effectively, "So, there. I showed you. I"ll do as I please, no matter the damage." This would suggest that he"s the "Lemming in Chief," leading the US over a fiscal cliff.


It could also be argued that he is, instead, the "Patsy in Chief," and is being cleverly played by those who understand his personality weaknesses and repeatedly goad him into unwise decisions that will benefit them, but will ultimately be disastrous for the country.



Either way, what we"re witnessing is a train wreck about to happen, and we"re all, to a greater or lesser extent, on that train.


For many years, in predicting the economic collapse of what was once known as the “free world,” I"ve stated my belief that, whilst we cannot predict the actual dates when the primary events will occur, we can observe the lead-up events—that they"ll increase in both frequency and magnitude the closer we get to the collapse. We"ve recently been in the stage where lead-up events have become weekly. We now appear to be entering the stage where lead-up events become daily. Once we"ve reached this stage, it"s time to fasten our seat belts.


So, in returning to the image above, is this the end of the world? In a word, no. Those who profess the coming end of the world have been with us for, literally, thousands of years. They"re just as misguided and incorrect today as they"ve always been.


It is true, however, that the world as we know it is about to undergo the most dramatic change that we"ll witness in our lifetimes. Most certainly, we"re presently in the greatest economic bubble the world has ever seen, which assures us that, when it breaks, the damage it causes will be correspondingly great.


But let"s have a second look at the image above. It seems apparent that the three men in it are part of a religious group, recommending that mankind repent. As can be seen on the placard in the middle, "Ye must be cleansed."


Regardless of any religious connotations to this placard, there"s accuracy in its economic connotations. A collapse is inescapable at this point. The system must be cleansed, much in the way an alcoholic must dry out, or an addict must get the drugs out of his system, before the recovery can begin.


When a crisis of these proportions occurs, it"s not possible to simply acknowledge the collapse, then begin anew the next day. Just like the alcoholic or the addict, we can"t just hit the reset button and start anew. After a collapse, a long and painful process must begin to cleanse the system. In a collapse of the severity of the one we"re facing, the cleansing promises to be quite long and quite painful.


Twenty years ago, in predicting the coming collapse, Harry Schultz predicted, “ten years down; ten years up.” It may well be that his prediction was actually conservative, and we"re now looking at a longer period, as so much additional damage has been done since his prediction.


But, before we leave this topic, it"s important to look at one more factor. Historically, economic wars have a habit of becoming shooting wars.


It"s not commonly known that the US war with Japan was precipitated by the US repeatedly putting the squeeze on Japan economically.


President Roosevelt froze Japanese assets in the US. He subsequently succeeded in cutting Japan off from three-quarters of their international trade. Finally, he cut them off from almost 90% of their oil supply.


It could be argued that, at that point, Japan had no choice but to go to war, however badly it might turn out for them.


Could it be that the US government imagines that similar tactics will force China into a war, so that, when that war ends, the US would control China as it did Japan after 1945?


If that"s their intent, the outcome would be unlikely to turn out as they imagine. Although the sabre rattling by US political leaders and retired generals is heard daily on the American news programmes, and the American people are clearly being indoctrinated to believe that war might be necessary, America has never been less ready for a war.


The US is a very different country from what it was in 1941. It does possess a sizable military; however, that military is no match for the combined forces of China and Russia. Moreover, the US is not the industrial giant it was in 1941. Its factories have largely closed and moved overseas. What remains is not sufficient for wartime production. The American people as a whole are heavily in debt and the government itself is broke.


By any standard, the actions being taken by the US are therefore reckless indeed. The end of the world is not nigh, but the end of the world as we know it most certainly is.


If there"s a light at the end of the tunnel, it may lie in the fact that, in previous world wars, there were always countries that simply didn"t take part. They sat it out in peace, while the rest of the world went mad. This is still true today.


*  *  *


Unfortunately, most people have no idea what really happens when an economy collapses, let alone how to prepare. We think everyone should own some physical gold. Gold is the ultimate form of wealth insurance. It"s preserved wealth through every kind of crisis imaginable. It will preserve wealth during the next crisis, too. But if you want to be truly "crisis-proof," there"s more to do... How will you protect yourself in the next crisis? We just released a PDF guide that will show you exactly how. Click here to download it now.

Thursday, August 31, 2017

Same Day FX Wars? Dollar Tumbles After Mnuchin Says "Weaker Dollar Better", Undoing Euro Losses

The smell of currency war is rising in the air.


Less than six hours after the ECB lobbed the first trial balloon of the day, when Reuters reported that ECB policymakers were "growing worried" about the recent rapid gains in the Euro, sending the EURUSD sharply, if briefly lower, the entire move is now a distant memory following jawboning from US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who moments ago said on CNBC that "having a weaker dollar is somewhat better for trade", a statement which immediately spooked algos into dumping the USD...



... selling the USDJPY by 30 pips to 109.90...



... and sending the EURUSD right back to 1.19, where it was before the ECB"s Reuters "intervention."



And while Mnuchin also added that a strong USD in the long-term "reflects confidence", algos decided to ignore that. His key statement below:





"As it relates to trade, having a weaker dollar is somewhat better for us. What I’ve said consistently is: Where the dollar is in the short-term is less of a concern for me. I do think over long periods of time, the dollar strength is an indication of the reserve currency and the confidence that people have in the U.S. economy."



Then again, when asked by Liesman if a strong dollar is good for the U.S., he responded “it’s not a question of whether it’s better or not, it’s somewhat inevitable given the strength of the U.S. economy and the confidence that people have.”


While not nearly as FX moving, Mnuchin also said that the Administration"s aim is to get a 15% tax rate, explicitly said he was working with Gary Cohn and other lawmakers on the tax plan. Mnuchin also said that he meets with Yellen on a weekly basis and has a "constructive dialog" with the Fed chair, although he refused to comment on her future, and said Trump would decide the next Fed chair.


More amusingly, on the topic of the tax package he vowed that "there absolutely is a tax package", that revenue neutrality remains under discussion, and promised that the tax reform package will pacy for itself with US "growth."


Finally, he said that while more money is needed for Harvey, he wouldn"t say how much, while on the topic of the debt ceiling he did note that "nobody would let the US default."


His key comments courtesy of Bloomberg:


  • MNUCHIN: HAVING A WEAKER USD IS SOMEWHAT BETTER FOR U.S. TRADE

  • MNUCHIN: THERE ABSOLUTELY IS A TAX PACKAGE

  • MNUCHIN: TAX PACKAGE SHOULD BE PAID FOR WITH ECONOMIC GROWTH

  • MNUCHIN HE"S BEEN WORKING WITH COHN, LAWMAKERS ON TAX PLAN

  • MNUCHIN SAYS BLUEPRINT TO BE RELEASED FOR CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW

  • MNUCHIN SAYS REVENUE NEUTRALITY IS UNDER DISCUSSION

  • MNUCHIN: PLAN INCLUDES MIDDLE-CLASS TAX CUT, SIMPLIFICATION

  • MNUCHIN SAYS OBJECTIVE IS TO GET CORPORATE TAX RATE TO 15%

  • MNUCHIN: TAX PACKAGE SHOULD BE PAID FOR WITH ECONOMIC GROWTH

  • MNUCHIN: SEPT. 29 DEBT CEILING DATE COULD MOVE A LITTLE

  • MNUCHIN SAYS WE"RE ON TRACK TO GET TAX PLAN BY YEAR END

  • MNUCHIN SAYS NEXT BIG CASH DATE IS SEPT. 15 W/ CORPORATE TAXES

Thursday, August 24, 2017

Mnuchin’s PR Visit to Fort Knox proves nothing about the US Gold Reserves

Submitted by Ronan Manly, BullionStar.com


On the afternoon of Monday, August 21, US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin, and Kentucky Congressman Brett Guthrie took a visit to the vault of the US Mint’s gold depository in Fort Knox, Kentucky, a vault which, according to the US Treasury, holds gold bars containing 147,341,858 fine troy ounces of gold (4583 tonnes of gold).


The trip was notable in that it is one of the rare occasions in history that a US political/congressional delegation has ever visited the Fort Knox depository, and Mnuchin is now only the 3rd treasury secretary ever to make this visit.


The trip was also notable in that unlike previous political excursions to the vault, the Mnuchin-led visit was very low-key, it was announced to the media and public at extremely short notice, and there is no evidence that any media representatives participated, or at least if they did, they have kept very quiet about it.



US Mint Depository, Fort Knox, Kentucky


In contrast, the previous congressional visit to the Fort Knox depository in September 1974 was heavily publicised in advance, was accompanied by 100 news reporters and photographers, and it even documented the visit via photographs and film which were released to the public.


Mnuchin’s visit to the vault merely appears to have taken the form of a quick peek into one of the cramped vault compartments within the Fort Knox vault, and therefore can only be seen as an odd PR stunt whose real intent remains unclear, which does nothing to improve the transparency of the notoriously secretive gold depository, and which on balance has now re-opened scrutiny on how much gold is, or is not, actually stored in the compartments of the Fort Knox vault.


The trip to the Fort Knox vault was only announced by Mnuchin on Monday morning, August 21 (the morning of the Fort Knox visit) during a speech to the Chamber of Commerce in Louisville, Kentucky, which Mnuchin and Mitch McConnell were attending.


As Grace Schneider, a business reporter for the Louisville, Kentucky based Courier-Journal tweeted that morning.



So Mnuchin announced the visit literally a few hours before it took place. Fort Knox is located about 40 miles south-west of Louisville. In his Monday morning speech at the Chamber of Commerce, the Washington Examiner reports that Mnuchin made the bizarre comment that “I assume the gold is still there”. McConnell, at the same time, quipped that “we’re going to find out”. Mnuchin’s comment is bizarre because as US Treasury Secretary, he is top official of the US Treasury.


The US Treasury owns the gold in Fort Knox. The US Mint is just the custodian. The Director of the US Mint and all other senior officials report to Mnuchin. At any time, Mnuchin can get a full and complete high-level briefing on the real status of the US gold reserves. He can also get a full de-briefing on the extent to which the US gold reserves have been audited over the years – or not audited as the case may be. To say that he assumes the gold is still there shows either a flippant view of the expected accountability of a US Treasury Secretary, or else a disregard for the responsibility to which the US public has entrusted him.


Media Presence


It’s not clear whether any journalists actually accompanied the politicians on last Monday’s visit to the Fort Knox depository. An article by an AP journalist from Kentucky named Adam Beam was published on August 22, the day after the visit to the Fort Knox depository.


Beam, based in Frankfort, Kentucky is listed as a Kentucky Statehouse reporter for AP, so would presumably, due to this role, be well-known in Kentucky political circles and would have privileged access to the Mnuchin & Co delegation. AP’s Beam wrote that:


“Inside the famed vaults at Fort Knox, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell held a 27-pound gold bar in his hands Monday as part of the first civilian delegation to see most of the country’s bullion reserves in more than 40 years.”


But AP’s Beam also wrote in the same article that:


“in an interview, McConnell said he could not say much about the visit for security reasons”


suggesting that Beam may not have been on the actual visit to the vault, because if he was, he would have no need to interview McConnell and could have recorded the vault details himself. if the AP Kentucky Statehouse reporter wasn’t even on the visit, what hope was there for other reporters?


As far as I can see from related coverage, there are no photos of any of the delegation either inside the depository. This would suggest that there were no media photographers nor camera people present inside the vault. For such a historic trip, this is itself quite bizarre. Until that is, you realize that in 1978, the US Mint made the internal plans and structures of Fort Knox classified, which effectively bans any photography or filming from inside the depository.



Only One Compartment Viewed


The same AP article quoted Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin as saying that [Fort Knox] “officials had to cut a seal to open the vault for them“. What Bevin means is that the seal on the door of one of the compartments in the vault was cut so that they could open the door to the compartment. According to the US Mint, Fort Knox stores US Treasury gold bars in 13 compartments within the Fort Knox vault. See BullionStar article “Second Thoughts On US Official Gold Reserves Audits” for details.


By opening just one of the 13 compartments for Mnuchin & Co to peer into, that leaves 12 of the supposed gold storage compartments that were not opened. Still, this didn’t stop Mnuchin stating on Twitter that “Glad gold is safe“. This is a ridiculous statement from a US Treasury Secretary when you consider what the actual visit consisted of, and it would be remiss of the US public to put any trust in it.



Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin also said something similar in a radio interview following the vault visit, i.e. that the delegation only saw a subset of the supposed gold. Interviewed by Newradio 840 WHAS, and quoted by televison channel WHAS 11, Governor Bevin said:


“I didn’t see every bit of it [the gold], but the amount that I saw was impressive”


 See WHAS 11 video segment here.


The US Treasury Secretary takes a quick look into one of 13 compartments in the vault and says “Yep, the gold is safe, it’s there“. Imagine a commercial gold vault operating on the basis of how Fort Knox operates. It couldn’t. I have been in BullionStar’s precious metals vault in Singapore. I have looked around. There are a lot of gold bars, silver bars, gold coins and silver coins. But I couldn’t say based on a quick casual observation that ‘yep, all the gold and silver is there’.


That’s why there is a rigorous inventory system at BullionStar, and that’s why BullionStar employs a transparent multi-layered auditing system comprising 5 different audit schemes that are all accessible to customers. To ensure that at any given time, both BullionStar staff and customers know exactly what is inside the BullionStar vault.


But the US Treasury seems to think its sufficient that a quick unrecorded trip by 4 US political insiders can somehow instill confidence that all the gold that is claimed to be in Fort Knox is actually there. In case readers may think BullionStar is being unfair to the US Treasury, its worth noting that there have been many articles published on the BullionStar website by Koos Jansen that highlight the myriad of inconsistencies about the supposed gold reserves stored at Fort Knox and US government auditing of said gold reserves. See for example:


A First Glance At US Official Gold Reserves Audits”, March 2014


Second Thoughts On US Official Gold Reserves Audits”, February 2015


US Government Lost 7 Fort Knox Gold Audit Reports”, June 2015


Dear US Mint, We Gave You The FOIA Funds, Now Give Us The Fort Knox Audit Documents!”, November 2016


US Mint Releases New Fort Knox “Audit Documentation”. The First Critical Observations”, February 2017


 Conclusion


As a freebie trip for 4 select political insiders, last Monday’s trip to Fort Knox was undoubtedly a memorable one for them. In the same radio interview Bevin said that:


“This is like the mother of all field trips. This is pretty cool”


But as a validation and verification of over 56% of the supposed US Official Gold Reserves, the visit was a complete farce. Announced the morning it took place. No evidence that any media were allowed to participate. Only peeked into one of the 13 storage compartments. And then to round it off, Mnuchin (an ex Goldmanite) tweets that ‘Glad gold is safe“. You couldn’t make this up. And finally, no mention of the fact that most of the gold bars even supposedly stored in Fort Knox are low purity ‘coin bars’ made from melted down gold coins. In fact, of all the gold bars reported to be held within the US Gold Reserves, only 16% of these bars are of LBMA Good Delivery size and purity range.


This article originally appeared on the BullionStar website under the same title "Mnuchin’s PR Visit to Fort Knox proves nothing about the US Gold Reserves”.

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Mnuchin Visits Fort Knox, Says "Gold Is Safe"

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin had a busy day today: shortly after warning once again that a US debt ceiling deal has to be done by late September or else the country would run out of cash and suffer a technical default, roughly around the time he hinted that Trump may keep carried interest tax breaks for some firms that create jobs (while eliminating it for hedge fund managers), the former hedge fund manager and Hollywood producer paid a rare official visit to Fort Knox to check out the nation’s gold stash on Monday, while - as Bloomberg put it - keeping an open mind for future film projects.


“I assume the gold is still there,” Mnuchin told an audience in Louisville, Kentucky some 40 miles north of the biggest U.S. Bullion Depository (except of course for the foreign gold stash at the NY Fed). “It would really be quite a movie if we walked in and there was no gold.” It"s unclear if Mnuchin was envisioning a comedy or a drama.


After the visit, Mnuchin who was the first US Treasury Secretary to visit Fort Knox in nearly 70 years, "playfully" reassured Americans the treasure was still secure.


“Glad gold is safe!” he wrote in a post on Twitter.



Mnuchin, whose action-film credits include ‘‘Mad Max: Fury Road,” “The Lego Batman Movie” and “Suicide Squad,” according to Bloomberg, said that he would be only the third secretary of the Treasury to go inside the vault since it was created in 1936 by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.


“We have approximately $200 billion of gold at Fort Knox,” said Mnuchin. “The last time anybody went in to see the gold, other than the Fort Knox people, was in 1974 when there was a congressional visit. And the last time it was counted was actually in 1953.


Which is why the American public is so lucky it can take the word of a former Goldman partner without any trace of doubt... 

Sunday, August 20, 2017

Mnuchin Rejects Call From Yale Classmates To Resign, Defends Trump

In a long statement issued by the Treasury Secretary, Steven Mnuchin rejected and pushed back against an urging from his former classmates at Yale University that he resign from Donald Trump’s cabinet, while defending the president’s response to last weekend’s deadly protests in Charlottesville, Virginia.


The statement was in response to a letter posted online on Friday by about 300 of Mnuchin’s classmates from the Yale University undergraduate class of 1985, asking Mnuchin to resign in protest of Trump’s comments. “It is your moral obligation,” they said. “We know you are better than this, and we are counting on you to do the right thing.”


Mnuchin, realizing that with Bannon gone, Trump"s future policies are now a "clean slate" for the Wall Street/MIC complex to rewrite as it sees fit with no internal opposition, disagreed.


"I am writing in response to my Yale Classmates and many other comments I have received urging me to "speak out." I believe that your letter and these comments raise several Important issues and misconceptions that I am prepared to address", Mnuchin begins, adding that "some of these issues are far more complicated than we are led to believe by the mass media,’ the former Goldman employee and hedge fund manager said, paraphrasing the Dude"s legendary "lotta ins, lotta outs, lotta what-have-you"s."





"As someone who Is Jewish, I believe I understand the long history of violence and hatred against the Jews (and other minorities) and circumstances that give rise to these sentiments and actions. While I find it hard to believe I should have to defend myself on this,
or the president, I feel compelled to let you know that the president
in no way, shape or form believes that neo-Nazi and other hate groups
who endorse violence are equivalent to groups that demonstrate in
peaceful and lawful ways.



In his statement Saturday, Mnuchin suggested that Trump’s political opponents, including Republican rivals in last year’s primary campaign, were unfairly seizing on the Charlottesville uproar to “distract the administration” from policy issues. Just like Bannon, Mnuchin"s ties with Trump go back to the summer of 2016, when he first started as Trump’s campaign finance chairman before being named as Treasury secretary; according to the WSJ he has a close personal relationship with the president.





Mnuchin also referenced a broader national dialogue about the legacy of slavery and how historical figures should be remembered.



“Some of these issues are far more complicated than we are led to believe by the mass media, and if it were so simple, such actions would have been taken by other presidents, governors and mayors, long before President Trump was elected by the American people,” Mnuchin wrote.


Meanwhile, seeking to distance himself from the "nationalist" angle of his administration in the aftermath of Bannon"s firing, Trump extended an olive branch to Saturday"s demonstrators, saying that protests can be cathartic as thousands swarmed into downtown Boston on Saturday to speak out against white nationalists.


“Our great country has been divided for decades. Sometimes you need protest in order to heal, & we will heal, & be stronger than ever before!” the president said in a pair of tweets. “I want to applaud the many protesters in Boston who are speaking out against bigotry and hate. Our country will soon come together as one!”


And yet, just one hour before lauding Saturday’s protesters, Trump, who’s spending the weekend at his Bedminster, New Jersey, golf resort, was less sympathetic. “Looks like many anti-police agitators in Boston. Police are looking tough and smart!” He praised the effort of law enforcement officers and Boston Mayor Marty Walsh.


Mnuchin isn"t the only ex-Goldmanite who is staying: last week the market turmoiled on speculation that Trump"s top economic adviser and former Goldman COO Gary Cohn, was upset by Trump’s remarks and thinking about quitting. Cohn will remain in his position, a White House official said on Thursday.


With the "globalists" having won decisively the war for Trump"s Inner circle of influence, the markets are eagerly awaiting to see what if any change in tone, rhetoric and policies will be unveiled by the president. With the debt ceiling deadline looming, Trump has little time in which to make a decision what his upcoming pivot will look like.


Mnuchin"s full letter is below.


Monday, July 10, 2017

Mnuchin Kills Idea Of Tax Hike For The Wealthy

Last week the Republican party was at arms after Axios reported that Steve Bannon was said to be pushing president Trump to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans. According to the website, Trump’s chief strategist was urging to raise the top tax rate on individuals, with Axios saying the former Breitbart CEO looking for the top rate to have “a 4 in front of it” (currently, the highest income-tax bracket in the US is 39.6% for individuals earning more than $414,000 a year).


Well, they can now sleep easier after Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Sunday killed that particular idea, saying that the Trump administration is not considering a plan to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans in order to pay for tax breaks for the middle class. Speaking on ABC"s "This Week," Mnuchin said the administration plans is “absolutely committed” to releasing its tax plan in early September, and getting it through Congress by the end of the year - and that plan won’t include a 40 percent tax rate for the richest Americans.


“Our plan is to have a full-blown release of the plan in the beginning of September, with being able to vote and getting this passed before the end of the year,” Mnuchin said on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday.


The “objective” of the proposal is still that no one in the middle class will have a tax increase, Mnuchin said. “We’re finalizing the details of the plan, so there’s certain issues that are still on the table.”



Referring to the Axios report that Bannon was advocating a proposal to raise the highest tax bracket to 40% or above, Mnuchin responded "I"ve never heard Steve mention that" and added that “it’s very clear, kind of, we have a proposal out there that the administration has put out, with a top rate of 35% where we reduce and eliminate almost every single deduction.”


Mnuchin said the administration’s plan would pay for itself, but that’s only if about $2 trillion in increased revenue resulting from projected faster economic growth is included. Yet congressional budget scorekeepers may not agree that tax cuts would produce such growth. Under congressional budget rules, tax cuts can be passed with a simple majority in the U.S. Senate, but only if they don’t increase the deficit after 10 years. That would allow Republicans, who have 52 Senate seats, to pass the bill without any Democratic votes.


The Treasury Secretary also said that the administration is aware of the concerns in high-tax states, where taxpayers could have no tax reductions as well as fewer deductions. “We’ve heard a lot of feedback from New York, California, New Jersey, Connecticut, Illinois, and I think we want to be sensitive to those states and those economies as we shape the plan,” Mnuchin said.


Separately, Mnuchin - who spoke after returning from the Group of 20 meeting in Hamburg - dodged a question about whether President Donald Trump had accepted President Vladimir Putin’s denial of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.


“Why would President Trump broadcast exactly what he said in the meeting?” Mnuchin said, adding that Trump is focused on “strategically negotiating” with Putin.


Thursday, February 23, 2017

Mnuchin Praises Strong Dollar, Adds To Currency Confusion

Following today"s more dovish than most expected minutes, the dollar tumbled and its main carry counterpart, the yen spiked. However, shortly after 4pm, the USDJPY resumed its levitation, a time when the traditional trust bank intervention on behalf of the BOJ was not yet in play. The reason for the updraft in the dollar was the publication of an interview in the WSJ with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, his first since being sworn in as Treasury Secretary last week, in which he appeared to advocate a "strong dollar", and said the strong U.S. currency "is a reflection of confidence in the U.S. economy", adding that its performance compared with the rest of the world and was a “good thing” in the long run.



“I think the strength of the dollar has a lot to do with kind of where our economy is relative to the rest of the world, and that the dollar continues to be the leading currency in the world, the leading reserve currency, and a reflection of the confidence that kind of people have in the U.S. economy,” Mr. Mnuchin said.


Mnuchin"s remarks are notable because like in his confirmation hearing in January, he contradicts many other White House officials, including not only Trump"s key trade advisor Peter Navarro, but President Donald Trump himself, both of whom have suggested in the past that they favored a weaker currency to support the U.S. trade position.


The dollar has appreciated by 23% over the past three years and added to those gains since Mr. Trump’s November election; recent US export weakness and numerous disappointing corporate earnings results have been blamed on the stronger dollar. A stronger dollar goes against the very basis of Trump"s desire to make the US into an export powerhouse.


“For longer-term purposes, an appreciation of the dollar is a good thing, and I would expect longer-term, as you’ve seen over periods of time, the dollar does appreciate,” Mr. Mnuchin added.


It was the short term, however, that was far more interesting to FX traders whose P&L is updated on a daily, not decade basis


“In the short term, there are certain aspects [of a strong currency] that are positive about the dollar for our economy and there are certain aspects that are not as positive,” Mr. Mnuchin said. “A lot of the appreciation of the dollar since the election in particular is a sign of confidence in the Trump administration and the economic outlook for the next four years.”


It is unclear if that statement was a veiled pitch to begin selling the dollar.


As reported yesterday, perhaps it was the "short term" that Mnuchin was discussing when he held his first phone call with Christine Lagarde, and told the IMF"s managing director that he expects the IMF to provide "frank and candid" analysis of exchange rate policies.


As the WSj adds, the Treasury Department traditionally has been the leading voice from the U.S. on foreign exchange policy and notes that "the past several administrations have for the most part signaled support for a strong currency, even though at times an appreciation of the currency has hurt exports." Of course that ignores the fact that it was the historic debasement of the dollar with the Fed"s various QE programs that provided the US with an extensive trade advantage for years against its main trading peers, who only joined the currency devaluation race far later.


Mnuchin deferred when asked about China’s currency and said he looked forward to “healthy bilateral relations” with the world’s second largest economy.


“There’s trade issues that will make sense to look at, and I think there’s investment issues that will make sense to look at,” he said. “There are many things that we will need to collaborate on.” Previously Trump said he would label China a currency manipulator on his first day as president, although he may have since changed his mind upon learning that for the past two years China was intervening to strengthen, not weaken, its currency in order to mitigate and prevent China"s historical capital outflows, which have so far resulted in over $1 trillion in capital flight.

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

The Guy Trump Just Put in Charge of the Economy Has Deep Ties to George Soros




(ANTIMEDIA) Donald Trump’s cabinet picks have raised doubts about his commitment to the anti-establishment platform he promoted during the presidential race. Though he drew praise shortly after the election for taking meetings with people as diverse as Democratic Senator Tulsi Gabbard and a libertarian who advocates abolishing the Federal Reserve, his final selections were less predictable.


The president’s selection of hedge fund manager Steven Mnunchin as Treasury Secretary — and Mnunchin’s subsequent confirmation on Monday — has drawn criticism, in part, because of Mnunchin’s seventeen-year career at Goldman Sachs. However, the loathed financial giant’s presence in American politics is, at this point, par for the course — even when it’s instigated by a candidate who campaigned on “draining the swamp.”







Beyond Goldman Sachs, more concerning to Trump supporters who expect change from their new president should be Mnunchin’s ties to one of the most hated leftist figures in America: George Soros.




Join the Revolution: Click Here for the Homepage of Independent Media




It’s one thing to purchase stock or invest in a company whose values you disagree with. After all, Green Party candidate Jill Stein admitted last year that regretfully, her investment portfolio includes companies reliant on fossil fuel and other industries that clash with her ideology. Still, she noted they were choices made by investors who manage her wealth.


But Mnunchin didn’t just invest in a company tied to George Soros — or have others do so. He actually started an investment fund with him. From Newsweek:







After departing Goldman, Mnuchin went to work for SFM Capital Management, a firm backed by billionaire George Soros, known for bankrolling liberal causes and candidates. Mnuchin later worked directly for Soros Fund Management. During the 2016 campaign season, Soros donated heavily to Priorities USA Action, a pro-Hillary Clinton super PAC.”


Though Newsweek notes it is “not clear from news reports how close Mnuchin and Soros were, if at all,” the outlet continued:


In 2004, Mnuchin departed to start his own hedge fund, Dune Capital Management. Bloomberg News reported that Dune ‘got hundreds of millions of dollars from Soros.’”


This is particularly newsworthy, especially considering Trump mouthpiece Breitbart News has covered the revelation that Soros allegedly donated $650,000 to Black Lives Matter, which many on the right have accused of being a terrorist organization. In their article on Trump’s selection of Munchin, however, Breitbart’s only acknowledgment of the candidate’s ties to Soros read:


He also partnered briefly with liberal financier George Soros.


They made no mention of the “hundreds of millions of dollars” tied up between Trump’s pick and the alleged neoliberal puppet master, nor that the actual ties of Soros’ organizations to protesters are scant — and about as extensive as Mnunchin’s own ties to the billionaire financier.


As journalist Justin King reported for Fifth Column News shortly after the election, when protesters were accused of being hired by Soros:


There it was. Money had certainly flowed from Soros to these organizations. Three in particular.


“United We Dream: This organization received $75,000 from Open Societies.


Clean Water Action: Received about $36,000 from an organization called America Votes that draws funding from an organization Soros is said to support.


“Washington CAN!: This organization received $50,000 from Open Societies.


“While this may seem like concrete evidence, there’s a problem. United We Dream received that money in 2010. Clean Water Action obtained their funds two years ago. Washington CAN! obtained its money seven years ago. Incidentally, their funds were used to purchase telemarketing equipment.”


As King established, the ties Soros had to protest and activist groups were circumstantial and failed to prove any direct links between the funds and actions taken in the streets following the election. But that didn’t stop many right-leaning news organizations from reporting heavily on the Soros-funded resistance. If these tenuous ties are to be taken seriously, however, the same standard must also be applied to Soros’ ties to Mnunchin; they may not be explicit or reveal that Mnunchin has taken tangible actions taken as a result of the money. But the investment endeavors and transfer of hundreds of millions of dollars is, by the logic used to indict protests, enough to discredit Mnunchin.


King astutely notes:


If these circumstantial ties through years-old financial deals are enough to make you believe Soros is in control of these organizations, then it doesn’t matter what the protesters do because Soros is in control of President Trump. Soros funded Trump Tower. In 2008, Trump and Soros were both defendants in a RICO complaint. Trump and Soros are such good friends, they spent Christmas Eve together. Those are the same sort of open-ended ties that are being used to confirm this theory.


Soros has largely become a kiss of death to politicians, especially those on the right. Often, conspiracy theories swirl around Soros’ plots to take over the world and institute a new liberal order. While these theories are difficult to prove simply through financial ties and the billionaire’s emphatic support for Hillary Clinton, the stigma surrounding the mogul continues.


Whether or not these theories about Soros are true, the Trump-supporting wing of the United States would do well to function from principle and question Trump’s appointment. After all, according to Breitbart, which now holds a powerful position in the Trump administration, Soros is a dangerous man. Of his initiative to work with the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Breitbart wrote:


The institutional left’s funding behemoth W.K. Kellogg Foundation has partnered with and given major donations to George Soros’s Open Society Institute and the Tides Center as part of its massive push to promote a far-left agenda.” [emphasis added]


Though Mnunchin’s ties to Goldman Sachs hardly imply Trump’s pick is eager to push a “far-left agenda,” his proximity to Soros in any capacity — let alone a profit-making venture — should be cause for alarm among a demographic that claims to be eager to remove special influences from positions of power.


But it’s not just Mnucnhin’s ties to Soros that should raise eyebrows. In the 2016 election, Mnunchin donated to only four entities: Donald Trump, who received the vast majority of funds; Kamala Harris, a Democrat; Michael Wildes, a Democrat; and ActBlue, a super PAC that describes itself as a “the online clearinghouse for Democratic action.”


In 2008, he donated to the presidential campaigns of Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, and…wait for it… Democrats Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Chris Dodd, Bill Richardson, and John Edwards, as well as several Democrats running for Congress. He also donated funds to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama when they were running for Senate. He has an indisputably extensive history of contributing election funds to Democrats.


Ultimately, what Mnunchin’s financial ties prove is not only that he represents the swamp Trump vowed to drain, but that when it comes to financial moguls seeking to wield influence over the political process, there is little room for partisanship.


Though Mnunchin’s ties to reviled financial institutions may be easy for Trump supporters to dismiss – just as many Obama loyalists did — it should be more difficult for them to explain away the new Treasury Secretary’s ties to the leftist archvillain.


Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Republicans Change Confirmation Rules To Overcome Democrat Boycott

In an unexpected move on Tuesday, Senate Democrats announced they would boycott the votes of Steven Mnuchin and Tim Price, effectively blocking the confirmation process which requires the presence of at least one Democrat. However, on Wednesday, Senate Republicans found a loophole to push through Trump’s two Cabinet nominees Wednesday, by upending standard committee rules to circumvent a Democratic boycott.


As Bloomberg reports, the Senate Finance Committee - with only Republican members present - advanced Steven Mnuchin to head the Treasury Department, and Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) as secretary of Health and Human Services. They did so when the Republicans gathered in the hearing room and unanimously agreed to change the committee’s standing rules, which normally require at least one member of each party to be in attendance for committee work to proceed.


“It’s just another way of roughing up the president’s nominees,” said committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). “They have been treated fairly. We have not been treated fairly.”


Republicans made the unusual move after Democrats refused to attend a vote on the nominees for two days running, arguing the pair had made misleading statements to lawmakers that needed to be rectified. The nominees now head to the Senate floor, as partisan tensions over filling out Trump’s White House continued to intensify.


The reason for the Democrat boycott is that allegedly questions continue to swirl for weeks around Price’s investment activity, including whether his political actions benefitted his personal portfolio. “Both nominees have yet to answer important questions that impact the American people,” committee Democrats wrote in a letter sent to Hatch Wednesday. 


“Further, we have significant concern that both Mr. Mnuchin and Mr. Price gave inaccurate and misleading testimony and responses to questions to the Committee. These cabinet nominees should answer basic questions that the American people deserve answers to before moving forward.”


Hatch was dismissive of that argument Wednesday. “Oh, come on. Come on,” he said. “They don’t have one argument that’s worthwhile. Not one. And if they had, they should have shown up."


Ultimately, The Senate Finance Committee moved to report both of President Donald Trump’s nominees to the Senate floor on 14-0 votes, with only Republicans participating, after voting to suspend the panel’s rules.  “I don’t care what they do, but the parliamentarian said this is a proper decision.” Hatch told reporters after the votes.


The latest Democratic blockade was the latest example of the party’s efforts to slow the consideration of Trump’s nominees to a crawl, as the party and its base hardens in opposition to the new president; however, for now it appears to have its work cut out. That said, with animosity between the two parties already at nosebleed levels, it is unlikely that any laws demanding a bipartisan effort - such as the replacement of Obamacare - will be implemented.

Sunday, January 8, 2017

Steven Mnuchin Donated To One Democrat In 2016 – The Woman Who Declined To Prosecute His Bank

Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,



Wednesday’s post, Donald Trump Has an Enormous and Very Dangerous Wall Street Blind Spothighlighted the fact that the bank run by Trump’s Treasury Secretary nominee, Steven Mnuchin, was given a pass by California attorney general Kamala Harris, despite the discovery of over a thousand legal violations. Kamala Harris has since been (s)elected to the U.S. Senate.


Let’s recap some of what we learned:





In the memo, the leaders of the state attorney general’s Consumer Law Section said they had “uncovered evidence suggestive of widespread misconduct” in a yearlong investigation. In a detailed 22-page request, they identified over a thousand legal violations in the small subsection of OneWest loans they were able to examine, and they recommended that Attorney General Kamala Harris file a civil enforcement action against the Pasadena-based bank. They even wrote up a sample legal complaint, seeking injunctive relief and millions of dollars in penalties.



But Harris’s office, without any explanation, declined to prosecute the case.



Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, warned: “Given Mr. Mnuchin’s history of profiting off the victims of predatory lending, I look forward to asking him how his Treasury Department would work for Americans who are still waiting for the economic recovery to show up in their communities.”



The consistent violations of California foreclosure processes outlined in the memo would indicate that Mnuchin’s bank didn’t merely act callously, but did so with blatant disregard for the law.



According to the memo, OneWest also obstructed the investigation by ordering third parties to refuse to comply with state subpoenas.



The memo also raises questions about then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris, who was sworn in as a U.S. senator on Tuesday, and who will soon have to vote on Mnuchin’s appointment.



Why did her office close the case, deciding not to “conduct a full investigation of a national bank’s misconduct and provide a public accounting of what happened,” as her own investigators had urged?



In the days since this story broke, there’s been a lot of well deserved scrutiny pointed in the direction of Ms. Harris, yet she’s failed to provide a satisfactory answer as to why her office failed to prosecute. Which got me thinking about another paragraph from the above article:





Harris’s prodigious fundraising also raises questions about how attentive she is to the needs of campaign contributors. Prior to signing on with Trump, Mnuchin donated to members of both parties. He gave $2,000 to Harris’ Senate campaign in February 2016. Among the investors in OneWest Bank was major Democratic donor George Soros, who maxed out to Harris’ campaign in 2015.



Did he really “donate to members of both parties.” Technically, yes, but it appears Kamala Harris was the only Democrat he donated to in 2016. Which raises all sorts of obvious questions. As the Sacramento Bee noted last month in its article, Kamala Harris Won Over Many Californians, Steve Mnuchin Included:





Donald Trump, promising to drain the swamp, picked former Goldman Sachs executive and Hollywood financier Steven Mnuchin to be his Treasury secretary, fitting because Mnuchin helped fatten Trump’s campaign treasury as his campaign finance chairman. Mnuchin donated $592,600 to Republicans in 2016, including $430,000 to Trump, Federal Election Commission records show. A onetime Hillary Clinton donor, Mnuchin gave one donation this year to a Democrat, $2,000 to help elect Attorney General Kamala Harris to the U.S. Senate.



Well isn’t that interesting. Mnuchin gives one donation to a Democrat, and it just so happens to be the woman who inexplicably protected his bank from prosecution. Click here to see his 2016 donations.


While $2,000 is a small amount of money, the entire thing stinks. Kamala Harris should resign from her Senate seat immediately unless she can provide a reasonable explanation of why she let OneWest off the hook. Likewise, Steven Mnuchin should be replaced by Trump as Treasury Secretary nominee. Both are swamp creatures, and we should demand better than these two.