Showing posts with label Energy economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Energy economics. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Is U.S. Gasoline Consumption Set To Collapse?

Authored by Tsvetana Paraskova via OilPrice.com,


U.S. individual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) growth has been flat since June 2017, and the potential end of the VMT growth that started in early 2014 may be an indicator of slowing oil consumption, according to government data compiled by Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.



(Click to enlarge)


Gasoline is the most consumed petroleum product in the U.S. Last year, motor gasoline consumption averaged about 9.3 million bpd, or 391 million gallons per day - the largest amount recorded and equal to about 47 percent of total U.S. petroleum consumption, data by the EIA shows.


Some 29 percent of all U.S. energy consumption in 2016 was for transporting people and goods from one place to another, the EIA says. Petroleum products provided around 92 percent of the total energy the U.S. transportation sector used last year.


The latest available data by the U.S. Department of Transportation shows that the seasonally adjusted vehicle miles traveled for October 2017 stood at 268 billion miles, a 0.8-percent increase over October 2016, and 0.2-percent growth as compared to September 2017. The cumulative estimate for this year is 2,685 billion vehicle miles of travel.


In its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO), the EIA said that in November, U.S. regular gasoline retail prices averaged $2.56/gallon, an increase of nearly 6 cents/gal from the average in October, primarily reflecting rising crude oil prices. EIA forecasts the U.S. regular gasoline retail price will average $2.59/gal this month, 34 cents/gal higher than at the same time in 2016. For 2018, EIA expects U.S. regular gasoline retail prices to average $2.51/gal.


Gasoline prices and increases in fuel efficiency are important factors in U.S. gasoline sales that are also highly seasonal, but according to Jill Mislinski at Advisor Perspectives, there are also some significant demographic and cultural dynamics affecting the U.S. gasoline consumption trends.


In a post from November 2017, Advisor Perspectives said that apart from fuel efficiency improvements, declines in gasoline consumption can be attributable in large part to factors such as an aging population leaving the workforce; growing trend toward working from home; social media providing alternatives to face-to-face interaction requiring transportation; a general trend in young adults to drive less; and accelerating urban population growth, which reduces the per-capita dependence on gasoline.  









Friday, December 15, 2017

California Moves One Step Closer To "Mileage Tax"; Could Require Tracking Your Cell Phone Movements

Just a few months after implementing a massive 60% hike in gasoline taxes, raising them from $0.297 per gallon to $0.417, the state of California is now one step closer to implementing a brand new tax that would charge drivers for each mile driven. 


As a quick example of how shockingly misguided such a piece of legislation would be, the logical conclusion here is that poor people who have been forced out of cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego due to rising rents would now be forced to incur yet another massive tax for simply commuting into city centers to do their jobs...in essence, in many cases, it would serve as a regressive tax on the poorest families...


So how did we get here?  It all started back in 2014 when California passed Senate Bill 1077 calling for a mileage tax.  The bill kicked off the California Road Charge Pilot Program which sought to design and test various strategies for implementing a mileage tax.



Now, after 3 full years of studying various methodologies for tracking mileage, from requiring a "plug-in" for each vehicle to tracking your smart phone movements to more manual systems that would track odometers, the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA), according to a newly filed report is officially ready to declare a mileage tax "feasible".  Here"s what they found:








The Road Charge Pilot Program successfully tested the functionality, complexity, and feasibility of the critical elements of this new potential revenue system - road charge - for transportation funding.


 


  • Manual options provide the highest degree of privacy and data security, but will in all likelihood be the most difficult to enforce, and could be costly to administer

 


  • Plug-in devices are the most reliable options, however as new technology emerges this methodology could be obsolete by the time a road charge program is adopted

 


  • More technologically advanced methods, such as the smartphone application with location services and the in-vehicle telematics show great promise, but need further refinement



Of course, as State Senator Scott Wiener points out, a mileage tax will be a huge blow to all the folks that have been coaxed into electric vehicles over the years by tax subsidies which made them more affordable.  While those folks have been able to avoid gasoline taxes, part of the calculus that supposedly makes them "affordable", they won"t be able to avoid a mileage tax.  Per CBS:








But it’s not just a question about money, it’s also a question about fairness.


 


State Senator Scott Wiener and others are saying that when it comes to road taxes, it’s time to start looking at charging you by the mile rather than by the gallon.


 


“If you own an older vehicle that is fueled by gas, you’re paying gas tax to maintain the roads. Someone who has an electric vehicle or a dramatically more fuel efficient vehicle is paying much less than you are. But they are still using the roads,” Wiener said.


 


“People are going to use less and less gas in the long run,” according to Wiener.


 


And less gas means less gas tax, and less money for road repair.


 


“We want to make sure that all cars are paying to maintain the roads,” Wiener said.



Yet another reason for California residents to promptly consider a move to Texas...









Wednesday, December 6, 2017

WTI/RBOB Extend Losses On Biggest Gasoline Build In 11 Months, Record Crude Production

Following last night"s API-reported huge product inventory builds, bulls were hoping DOE would rescue WTI/RBOB prices but it did not as the dat confirmed a huge crude draw and even bigger product build (gasoline"s biggest weekly build since January). Adding to the pain, US crude production rose to another new record.


A gasoline build is likely as “refineries have been running very high, so it’s pretty natural,” James Williams, president of energy researcher WTRG Economics, says, adding that investors will also look to see the magnitude of a potential drop at Cushing.


API


  • Crude -5.48mm (-2.5mm exp)

  • Cushing -1.95mm (-2.4mm exp)

  • Gasoline +9.196mm - biggest build since Jan 2016

  • Distillates +4.259mm - biggest build since Jul 2017

DOE


  • Crude -5.61mm (-2.5mm exp)

  • Cushing -2.753mm (-2.4mm exp)

  • Gasoline +6.78mm (+2.56mm exp) - biggest build since Jan 2017

  • Distillates +1.667mm

Confirming API"s data, DOE showed a major crude draw, big drop at Cushing but major builds in products...



 


US Crude production rose 25k b/d to a new record high...



 


And WTI/RBOB prices were unable to bounce...










Wednesday, November 29, 2017

WTI/RBOB Spike On OPEC Headlines After Bearish Inventory/Production Data

Update: WTI/RBOB was fading after DOE data but then Kuwait dropped the following meaningless headline: OPEC JMMC RECOMMENDS EXTENSION, DIDN"T FINALIZE DURATION. And the algos took over...



*  *  *


Last night"s API-reported surprise crude build sparked selling that not even Russia/Saudi jawboning could rescue, but DOE data showed the exact opposite with a big crude draw and even bigger gasoline draw. Added to a new record high in US crude production and RBOB is fading and WTI is not rallying.


As Bloomberg reports, the U.S. has proven at least one thing this year with its expansion of crude and products exports: we are becoming more energy independent than ever before.


Last week net imports of all crude and refined products dipped to a new record low.



That"s coupled with record-high gasoline exports, a truly spectacular sea change in our world"s oil flows.


API


  • Crude +1.82mm (-2.95mm exp)

  • Cushing -3.178mm - most since Sept 2009

  • Gasoline -1.529mm (+1.2mm exp)

  • Distillates +2.696mm (+200k exp) - biggest since July

DOE


  • Crude -3.43mm (-2.95mm exp)

  • Cushing -2.914mm - biggest draw since Sept 2009

  • Gasoline +3.63mm (+1.2mm exp) - biggest build since July

  • Distillates  (+200k exp) - biggest buils since Jan

DOE data showed the exact reverse of API with big surprise draw in crude and build in gasoline... Additionally Cushing saw the biggest destocking since Sept 2009 last week...



US crude production rose 24k b/d - to a new record high...



Gasoline exports hit a record high...



 


WTI was lower and RBOB higher heading into the DOE data but the trend reversed after on the surprise bearish product builds...










Wednesday, November 15, 2017

WTI/RBOB Slide On Surprise Build As US Crude Production Hits New Record High

WTI/RBOB extended yesterday"s IEA-driven losses after a big crude build reported overnight by API, and DOE did nothing to assuage that with a 1.85mm crude build (admittedly smaller than API"s projected 6.5mm, but notably different from the 2.4mm draw expected), Gasoline also surprised with a build and WTI/RBOB extended losses. Additionally US Crude production rose to a new record high.


Bloomberg Intelligence energy analyst Fernando Valle notes:


Weaker demand drove a negative print for crude and product stocks. Strong refinery runs and rising crude exports were not enough to offset rising U.S. crude production. This latest increase, combined with reduced demand for refined products should put a damper on the oil-price recovery.



API


  • Crude +6.513mm  (-2.4mm exp) - biggest build in 9 months

  • Cushing -1.803mm - biggest draw in 4 months

  • Gasoline +2.399mm (-1.5mm exp) - biggest build in 3 months

  • Distillates -2.527

DOE


  • Crude +1.854mm (-2.4mm exp)

  • Cushing -1.504mm

  • Gasoline +894k (-1.5mm exp)

  • Distillates -799k

DOE data confirmed API"s reported builds in crude and gasoline (and a big drawdown in Cushing stocks)



US Crude production reached a new record high the previous week - not what OPEC hoped for - and last week"s big surge in the rig count suggests this is not about to slowdown as iot rose 25k b/d to a new record high...



 


WTI was hovering right at $55 heading into the DOE data and broiefly broke below on the print. RBOB is notably weaker...



“All of a sudden it seems that positives are in short supply for market bulls,” PVM Oil Associates analyst Stephen Brennock wrote in emailed report. “Yesterday’s slide is being compounded this morning by a fresh dose of price angst” sparked by the API report









Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Ruble, Real Tumble As Oil Slumps On Weaker IEA Outlook

WTI Crude is tumbling this morning, breaking down below $56 following a monthly report Tuesday from the International Energy Agency that said 2017 price gains along with milder-than-normal winter weather are slowing demand growth. This drop is weighing on oil-producers with the Ruble and Real dropping most...


The IEA reduced its demand estimate for next year by 200,000 barrels a day to 98.9 million a day, according to projections in its report. Forecasts for demand growth next year also fell by 100,000 barrels a day to 1.3 million a day.


“The market balance in 2018 does not look as tight as some would like, and there is not in fact a new normal” that would buoy prices above $60, said the Paris-based agency.



“If you put two and two together, it shows that we are going to be a little bit oversupplied in 1Q,” Michael Loewen, a commodities strategist at Scotiabank in Toronto, said by telephone referring to the IEA report. “Traders in the market are focusing on that right now. We rallied too far, too quick.”


This oil move has pushed the Ruble down to 3-month lows...back over 60 Ruble per USD...










Monday, October 9, 2017

The Geopolitical Consequences Of U.S. Oil Exports

Authored by Kent Moors via OilPrice.com,


Two crucial things happened last week.


The first you may have noticed – oil prices moved back up briefly.



As for the second, most so-called “experts” seemed to have missed.


See, the environment we’re seeing in energy markets is very different from what we saw only a week ago, when oil prices were also rising.


Because last week also saw – for the first time in world history – a reigning Saudi Arabian monarch in Moscow for talks with Russia’s head of state.


Historically, Russia has been much closer to Iran – Saudi Arabia’s main regional enemy.


Now, King Salman and President Putin are expected to endorse the plan to extend the OPEC-Russia deal to cut oil production and boost prices beyond the current end date of March 2018.


But that’s not all they’re going to talk about…


Other, more far-ranging matters will also be on the agenda, including the war in Syria.


And the catalyst for this huge shift in global geopolitics is surprisingly simple.


It’s all about America’s record-breaking oil exports…


Russia and Saudi Arabia Need Each Other… for Now


Now, there’s no indication that Russia and Saudi Arabia are on the road to an alliance on anything beyond oil prices.


Even then, that accord remains only as long as it is in the subjective interest of the parties.


Nonetheless, it is disquieting to Washington that any such prospects may be on the horizon… or that U.S. oil exports may be introducing a range of foreign policy concerns.


From an energy perspective, the main issue at hand is the OPEC-Russian deal to cap oil production, which is now almost certain to continue further than the agreed-on end date of March next year.


And after some concerns had been raised over individual OPEC members exceeding the quotas the deal assigned them, evidence is now emerging that the restraint is holding.


As I’ve several times before here in Oil & Energy Investor, there’s no genuine alternative.


The major global sources of oil need to allow the worldwide market to rebalance.


That’s the only genuine basis for stability and a slow increase in prices.


Now, with some of Libya’s oil production coming back on line, it may seem like there’s less flexibility for some producers to increase their crude output and still “hide” within the overall figures set by the cap accord.


But that’s ignoring four major factors that could cut into oil supply, and send prices higher…


Massive problems are accelerating in Venezuela, Nigerian extraction levels remain under threat from domestic instability, non-OPEC producer Mexico faces a continuing shortfall, and even the news from Libya – that a major field is coming back online – belies the ongoing civil unrest there, and lack of forward production expectations.


The international balance between supply and demand will provide a rising price.


Yet that rise will remain a gradual one.


And this balance doesn’t actually mean that there will only be exactly as much oil available as is needed at any given time.


That kind of “just in time” availability, where crude is lined only to meet immediate demand, is a certain recipe for high volatility and huge spikes in price.


Even a minor problem could create chaos in the markets.


Rather, a stable balance presupposes a continuing surplus of excess market volume.


That not only cushions the pricing dynamics from wide swings in demand, but it also allows producers the luxury of being able to predict the price range.


Anybody in the business will tell you that this predictability is far more important to maintaining profit margins than are the occasional large jumps in price.


An operator’s financial survivability requires that futures sales be calculated into the estimate of the cost of producing the oil and selling it on.


These prices, called “wellhead prices,” are the real revenue a producer receives in the first arms-length transaction as oil comes out of the ground.


These prices are also well below the market price quoted throughout a trading day.


U.S. Oil Production is at Record Highs


But the primary caveat in all of this talk about an emerging balance remains U.S. production.


It’s once again increasing and now has a more immediate impact on global pricing levels than has been the case previously.


That’s because American exports have become a major factor in the global market.


For some time, oil prices have not been determined by what occurs in developed markets of North America and Western Europe.


West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brent, the benchmark crude rates set in New York and London, may dictate daily trade. Yet the demand fueling the market is generated in developing areas worldwide.


Until recently, the U.S. only indirectly impacted upon the international determination of price.


In the past, the only effect came from how much the American market imported from elsewhere.


For over four decades, Congress banned the export of crude oil from the country on national security grounds.


Those restrictions resulted from the Arab oil embargo boycott of the U.S. during the 1973-74 Arab-Israeli War.


Today’s situation, where America has huge domestic extractable reserves of shale and tight oil, combined with significant improvements in production efficiency, has turned those security concerns obsolete.


There’s also the simple fact that no producing country in the world (with the possible exception of Iran, for political reasons) can afford not to sell to the U.S.


As a result, as part of a budget reconciliation two years ago, Congress lifted the ban on crude exports.


American refineries by that point were already leading the world in the export of processed oil products.


What followed was a quick move of American crude oil production back into the market…


Despite the Hurricanes, Oil Exports are Breaking Records


Exports had risen to a 1.1 million barrel a day level by the time Hurricane Harvey hit the Texas coast.


The hurricane slashed exports 60 percent. Refineries were also taken off line.


That combination should have pulverized crude oil prices, at least if you listened to the so-called “experts” on TV.


But that didn’t happen.


Instead, what happened next was nothing short of astounding.


Exports swiftly returned. Record levels were reached in each of the last two weeks.



As of last Friday, the U.S. was exporting 1.98 million barrels a day. The rising level of American volume in the broader market now has an impact on global price and the saliency of the OPEC-Russian agreement limiting production.


Because remember, U.S. production is not a party to that agreement.


The rising spread between WTI and Brent has also served as an additional inducement to increasing U.S. exports. The more international Brent prices have been increasing quicker than America’s WTI.


The difference, calculated as a percentage of WTI (the more accurate way of doing this), has now averaged more than 10 percent for the past 30 consecutive daily sessions – something that has not happened in over six years. Related: OPEC Producers Unmoved By U.S. Shale Threat In Asia


The advantage to American producers is simple. Exporting oil that costs less to produce at home into markets were the oil price is higher is a direct route to improving bottom lines.


As long as this situation remains, there will be additional U.S. production coming, because it’s profitable to extract and export.


And the more U.S. oil is exported, the less immediate effect higher production here has on domestic prices.


But this is also resulting in changes to foreign expectations.


Some of these are having spillover effects in other quarters…


Including sending Saudi Arabia and Russia into each other’s arms…


At least for now.

Friday, September 8, 2017

Rig Count Slumps To 3-Month Lows As US Crude Production Collapses

US crude production collapsed this week with most of Texas offline and we would expect rig counts to have continued to stabilize (if not fall) following the lagged track of WTI, and they did - oil rigs dropped 3 to 756, the lowest since June.




As a reminder, Crude production in the Lower 48 collapsed...



This is the biggest week-on-week fall since August 2012, when Hurricane Isaac shut in more than 1.3 million barrels a day of Gulf of Mexico production.



WTI prices tumbled today after China refinery cut headlines...



Uncertainty has the “market pulling in their horns ahead of the storm. They are worried about demand destruction,” Phil Flynn, senior market analyst at Price Futures Group, says. The market also “seems to be a little technically heavy”

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

How Trading Renewable Energy Will Grow the Industry

As the world becomes more environmentally aware, all eyes are on finding sustainable, long-term solutions to replace the use of non-renewable materials such as fossil fuels. Great steps are being taken to reduce greenhouse gases, notably carbon emissions, with recruiters like NES constantly looking to place talented individuals into key positions within the energy industry – but what could Europe’s renewable energy revolution have in store for the industry?


International power grid


Believe it or not, a relatively quiet mission is currently underway to create an economically significant and internationally successful power grid. It will help many countries benefit from natural resources like never before. It may sound like something from a futuristic movie, but an impressively intricate project has already begun to connect Britain to Norway’s huge hydroelectric power supplies.


The project will take years to complete, but when finished power lines running through a Norwegian mountain near Kvilldal will connect to Blythe in Northumberland via the longest undersea power cable in the world, stretching 450 kilometers.


The plan? To allow the UK and Norway to import and export natural power sources. The UK could import 1400 megawatts of electricity, enough to power over 750,000 homes. Norway will benefit from wind energy exported from the UK in a scheme that’s both intelligent and efficient.


The trade of surplus energy


The trade of surplus energy from one country to another forms the backbone of Europe’s renewable energy revolution. Using power interconnectors to link nations together in an eco-friendly way is a logical step when it comes to reducing emissions. But what does this mean for the future of energy usage?


An international power grid can theoretically produce more reliable energy supplies by helping to reduce the effects of intermittent energy produced by renewables such as wind and solar power.


Northern European countries, for instance, that produce large amounts of energy from the wind can trade electricity with sunnier European climates offering reliable and efficient solar power. The use of surplus energy is an innovative and forward-thinking approach to reducing the carbon footprint here on Earth and, if successful, could go a long way to reducing greenhouse gases. A successful international network of natural power could also drive down wholesale energy prices as people are given an alternative to how they fuel their lives.


Interconnectors already in use


With the Norwegian-UK project well underway, it’s also worth noting that interconnectors are already being used. The UK is connected to electricity sources in France and Ireland. Interconnectors in multiple other countries, including Belgium are in the advanced stages of planning or construction. Indeed a new interconnector linking the UK with France has recently been approved and looks set to power up to two million homes ensuring Britain’s energy supply is continuously resilient.


Europe’s large-scale renewable energy revolution will potentially make the world a greener environment with cleaner living gathering momentum across the globe.


Pay with rays

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Visualizing "Things To Come" - A Timeline Of Future Technology

Making predictions about future technology is both fun and notoriously difficult.


However, as Visual Capitalist"s Jeff Desjardins explains, such predictions also serve a very practical purpose for investors and business leaders, since failing to adapt to changing industry paradigms can completely decimate a business venture, turning it into the next Blockbuster, Kodak, or Sears.


Today’s infographic from Futurism rounds up some of the most interesting predictions about the future, from trusted sources such as Scientific American and The National Academy of Sciences.




MACHINES, BIG AND SMALL


The confluence of robotics, artificial intelligence, and increasing levels of automation is a prevailing trend throughout the projected timeline of future technology.


In less than 10 years, we will be able to control machines based on eye movements, while ingesting nano-sized robots to repair injuries from within our bodies. Later on, it’s also expected that the next wave of AI will be a reality: by 2036, predictive AI will be able to predict the near-future with impressive precision. Elections, weather, geopolitical events, and other dynamic systems will be analyzed in real-time using thousands or millions of data streams.


Even further down the line, human brains and machines will be continue to become closer to interfacing directly, creating all kinds of possibilities.


THE ENERGY REVOLUTION CONTINUES


If you think the current progress in clean energy is exciting – wait until you see the technologies in the queue.


The future of battery technology will include carbon-breathing batteries that turn CO2 into generate electricity, as well as diamond-based “nuclear batteries” that run off of nuclear waste.


Meanwhile, solar power will be even cheaper as cells operate at near 100% efficiency, and commercial fusion power will be available by 2044. Climate change will also be tackled by interesting techniques, such as geoengineering with calcite aerosols, and carbon sequestration.


MORE ON FUTURE TECHNOLOGY


Want to see more bold predictions about the future of technology?


Check out the future of alternative energy, the military, or the futuristic tech that could be inside your home.


Lastly, check out some very speculative predictions about what the world could look like, 100 years from now.

Friday, July 14, 2017

This Nation Just Became The World's Newest Energy Superpower

Authored by Dave Forest via OilPrice.com,


Lots of news this week on energy companies from one particular spot on Earth.


India.



In Lebanon — where reports suggest Indian state oil firm ONGC will bid for offshore blocks. In Canada — where Indian officials are said to be negotiating coking coal supplies. And even in Venezuela, where the cash-strapped government is seeking to sell ONGC a 9 percent stake in the key San Cristobal oil field.


And a new study released this week suggests it’s not coincidence we’re hearing so much about Indian companies on the energy stage.


In fact, India has quietly become one of the world’s biggest energy investors.


That revelation came from the International Energy Agency (IEA) — which released a report yesterday on energy investment trends for 2016. Showing that India’s investment in energy projects surged during the past year.


All told, India’s spending on electricity, oil and gas, coal and renewables jumped by 7 percent in 2016, as compared to the previous year. Reaching nearly $100 billion.


As the chart below shows, that rise was enough to vault India into third place globally for energy investment. Edging out oil giant Russia. India moved into third place globally for energy spending in 2016.



(Click to enlarge)


Of course, India’s energy spending is still a long way off second-place U.S. and top investor China. But the rapid rise of energy investment here shows this is an up-and-coming spot for project funding in oil and gas, and beyond.


IEA attributed India’s ascent to new government policies helping to modernize and expand the economy. Further evidence the country is “getting its act together” in becoming a true natural resource superpower.


That’s an important point of note for project developers globally. Especially given Indian firms seem to have appetite for places further out on the risk spectrum — evidenced by this week’s action in places like Lebanon and Venezuela.


As a final point of interest, the IEA study also showed that — for the first time ever — electricity passed oil and gas as the top energy sector for investment in 2016. Coming as capital spending in the global petroleum space plunged 38 percent between 2014 and 2016.


The group says however, that petro-spending should jump in 2017. Watch for Indian companies to be a big part of those deals and new projects.

Monday, July 10, 2017

Why Crude Oil Trades So Poorly

Via Global Macro Monitor,


Crude oil is the new widow maker.  It trades heavier than a wet dawg in a New York thunderstorm.    Rallies have no legs and its seems the only bid these days are the shorts with their family jewels caught in a vice grip.


ST_Crude Price


Note the recent lower highs and lower lows and stiff  resistance at the 50 and 200-day moving averages.


Technology Rapidly Changing Oil Industry


Maybe it because of the huge technological progress, which, has, for example,  driven the cost of the breakeven for some deep water drilling projects down 50 percent in the past few years.   Deep water projects, some of which, used to cost north of $100 per bbl elsewhere throughout the world have fallen to around $40–$50 per barrel in the Gulf of Mexico.   Absoulutely stunning!


OPEC is fighting the same forces that did “John Henry, the steel driving man” in.  And, for that matter, the same changes that have wiped out most of the floor traders on the NYSE.  Technology.


We came across this Foreign Affairs piece yesterday that absolutely floored us (be sure to click Foreign Affairs to read full article),





 The technology revolution has transformed one industry after another, from retail to manufacturing to transportation. Its most far-reaching effects, however, may be playing out in the unlikeliest of places: the traditional industries of oil, gas, and electricity.



…These technologies have helped drive oil prices down from an all-time high of $145 per barrel in July 2008 to less than a third of that today, and supply has become much more responsive to market conditions, undercutting the ability of OPEC, a group of the world’s major oil-exporting nations, to influence global oil prices.



…. As the price of oil tumbled from above $100 per barrel in early 2014 to below $50 per barrel in January 2015, many of these projects [deep water] stalled. By early 2016, companies had put on hold an estimated four million barrels per day of new oil output, 40 percent of it from deep-water sources.



…As drilling stalled, oil and gas operators, desperate to cut costs, began to rethink the complex systems they used.



…Today, thanks to these innovations, the average breakeven prices of new deep-water projects have fallen, to just $40–$50 per barrel in the Gulf of Mexico—an important global bellwether because it is one of the most responsive regions in the world to changes in market conditions. Even though oil prices remain low (and many in the industry expect them to stay low), investment is once again growing. Ten deep-water projects were approved for investment in 2016 and the first half of 2017 alone.  – Foreign Affairs



Technology only moves forward unless the Luddites take power, which given recent events can’t be entirely dismissed.   So, our guess is the long-term pressure on crude prices is lower.


The Middle East Mess


Shorter term,  however, we wouldn’t be surprised to see a “wag the dog” event in the Middle East and a price spike as there is currently no geopolitical risk premium in the crude price.  The Saudi-Iran conflict continues to heat up as they fight their  proxy wars across the region from Yemen to Syria.


Just yesterday, for example,  Iran took four Saudi sailors into custody and seized their naval vessel  after they entered Iran’s territorial waters in the Persian Gulf.     One stray missile into the side of an oil tanker in the Straights of Hormuz could send prices up $20 per bbl..  Certain emasculation of the leveraged shorts.   Suppliers would jump on those prices faster than a portfolio manager chasing a 7 percent yield on a 100-year Argentina bond, however.


Being short crude here is therefore not a sleep easy trade.   But, when is it ever an easy trade?


Conclusion


If the above is true, and we could be entirely wrong as articles such as these are not uncommon at bottoms,  the world and geopolitical forces that drive it are in for huge upheaval.


Breakeven_Crude Prices


Not only has the supply curve shifted way right it has become flatter or more elastic, that is sensitive to price moves.   The same is true for demand, which has shifted left in the west though it has increased in the emerging markets.   We wouldn’t bet on a huge spike in longer-term demand as technology - as in electric cars (hint Volvo) – continues to evolve at a rapid pace.    “In 2016, approximately 45 percent of the global oil demand was attributable to the road transportation sector.”


Oil Demand



Crude Prices_July8


Crude_Oil_July8.


Real Crude Prices


Finally,  it is important not to conflate crude oil’s relative price decline with a generalized global deflation.  It’s kind of frustrating to observe policy makers and market watchers exclude energy prices from the inflation indices when prices are rising and include them when prices are falling.  Easy money bias.


Maybe it’s time to sell those buggy whips.

Sunday, July 9, 2017

The Inevitability Of DeGrowth

Even though we don"t know precisely how the future will unfold, we know a few things about it:


  1. Of the 7.5 billion humans on the planet, virtually every individual wants to enjoy a high-energy consumption “middle-class” lifestyle. As a generous estimate, 1.5 billion people enjoy a high-energy consumption lifestyle today; the remaining six billion are aspirants hungry for all the goodies enjoyed by the 1.5 billion—all goodies based on affordable, abundant energy.

  2. Our dependence on debt to fuel growth—more extraction of resources, more energy, more manufacturing, more consumption and more earned income to pay for all this expansion of debt and consumption—has built-in limits: debt accrues interest and principal payments, which reduce the remaining income available to spend on consumption.  Our dependence on fast-rising debt just to maintain low rates of growth eventually limits our ability to pay for more consumption/growth. When most income is devoted to servicing debt, there isn’t enough left to buy more stuff or support additional debt.

  3. The debt needed to move the growth needle is expanding at a much higher rate than the growth it generates. While growth is stagnant, debt is expanding by leaps and bounds to unprecedented levels. (Global Debt Hits A New Record High Of $217 Trillion; 327% Of GDP)

  4. Wages are stagnating for the bottom 90% of the workforce. We can quibble about the causes, but there is no plausible evidence to support a belief that this trend will magically reverse.

  5. The cost of the most valuable energy--high-density, easy to transport—will slowly but surely become more expensive as the cheap, easy-to-extract energy sources are depleted, notwithstanding the temporary boost provided by the fast-depleting wells of the fracking “miracle.”

  6. There are limits on our exploitation of resources such as fresh water and wild fisheries. Humans can print currency (money) but we can’t print fresh water, energy, wild fisheries, etc. If one unit of currency currently buys one liter of petrol, printing 10 more units of money doesn’t create 10 more liters of fuel.  

  7. Creating currency out of thin air isn’t free in our system: all new currency is loaned into existence and accrues interest. As a result, all currency is a claim on future earnings. If we borrow enough from the future, and earnings remain flat or decline, eventually there’s not enough income left to support the debt service and the expanding consumption the status quo needs to keep itself glued together.


What’s the result if we add these up?


Simply put, debt-dependent consumption in a world in which wages stagnate for the bottom 90% and energy costs increase as demand outstrips supply is a system with only one possible end-point: collapse.


The Energy-Debt-Growth Connection


If we accept that energy will get increasingly scarce and costly, and real earned income for the vast majority of households is in structural decline, that means the global economy is in terminal trouble. As this chart shows, energy consumption per capita and GDP (gross domestic product, a measure of growth) are in near-perfect correlation: rising energy consumption per person is the foundation of economic expansion:



If energy consumption per person declines, so does GDP. If GDP/ economic expansion stalls, the global financial system--dependent as it is on the permanent expansion of debt and income to service that debt--has a problem.


In other words, energy, growth and debt are intrinsically linked. Analysts Gail Tverberg and Chris Martenson, among others, have been discussing the causal connections between energy, debt and the financial system for years. Here are recent examples of their work:


- The Looming Energy Shock (PeakProsperity.com)


- The Next Financial Crisis Is Not Far Away (OurFiniteWorld.com)


Simply put, the extraction of fossil fuel energy and the development of alt energy on a vast scale both require an equally vast expansion of interest-accruing debt, both to fund the actual extraction, processing and transport of energy and the consumers’ purchases of all the energy-intensive goods and services that keep the economy expanding.


Right now, oil and natural gas are relatively inexpensive compared to historical peaks, especially when prices are adjusted for inflation. Broadly speaking, the fracking “miracle” (based on expanding debt) has pushed supply temporarily higher than demand. (By temporary I refer to a timeline of a few years.)


The resulting collapse in energy prices, while welcome to consumers, negatively impacts energy companies" ability to seek new reserves (exploration and production), tap existing reserves that cost a lot to extract or build new alternative energy facilities on a large enough scale to matter.


As we witnessed in the 2008 spike in oil prices to $140 per barrel, soaring energy prices crush consumer spending, triggering stagflation and recession.


The solution is a Goldilocks price structure—energy prices that are not too high (for consumers), and not too low (for producers). The problem is that as energy costs ratchet higher while wages stagnate or decline, the financial capability of households and businesses to pay higher energy and debt-service costs and expand their consumption vanishes.


Something has to give: either consumption declines (triggering structural, permanent recession) or the energy sector goes bankrupt as its production costs cannot be covered by the price of energy consumers can afford to pay.


Meanwhile, the skyrocketing debt required to keep the entire status quo glued together is sapping income, reducing the every participants’ ability to pay for future growth.


These realities leave three possible futures:


  1. Energy prices move beyond what’s affordable, and the system breaks.

  2. Debt service costs rise above what’s affordable, and the system breaks.

  3. Both energy and debt service costs rise in tandem, and the system breaks. 

Magic Technology and Wishful Thinking to the Rescue


The consensus solutions to increasingly unaffordable energy are technological: new technologies are going to make energy abundant and so cheap it’s practically free.


While it’s true that there are many alternative energy technologies in development, the reality is few make financial sense and few have the potential to scale up rapidly enough to replace oil/coal/natural gas.


Take liquid fluoride thorium reactors. The consensus is that this form of nuclear energy is reliable and safe. Yet not a single working thorium reactor is in operation. (An update on the potential of LFTR power - PeakProsperity.com)


How about all those solar power technologies that are going to make electricity abundant and cheap everywhere? Magical thinking is appealing, but the reality is wind and solar make up roughly 2% of all energy consumed globally. These could double, triple, quadruple and then double again, and they wouldn"t even begin to replace fossil fuels.



Even if wind/solar became dirt-cheap to manufacture, install and maintain (in the real world, we have to measure total life-cycle costs, not just the initial purchase price), these alt energy sources are intermittent, and that"s a big problem for two reasons:





1. Batteries are not “free” and current technologies rely on scarce resources (lithium, etc.)



2. Utilities need to maintain significant power generation capacity to replace these sources during night, cloudy days, when the wind decreases, etc.



This means the entire infrastructure of fossil-fuel generated electricity must be maintained--a very costly requirement.


The other problem with the “electricity and storage will be nearly free” line of magical thinking is much of our transport system can"t be switched to electricity--aircraft, container ships, etc.


Virtually every optimistic vision of a cheap, abundant energy future overlooks these problems, or assumes each will effortlessly be solved with some new whiz-bang technology that just so happens to be dirt-cheap.


But not all technologies that work on in lab are affordable and not all technologies scale from the lab to production on a global scale.


Maybe some lab will invent a battery based on a cheap, abundant resource like silicon, but the process of manufacture may still be horrendously expensive, i.e. require a lot of energy and costly machinery. Even if batteries can be manufactured at a low cost, they’re only serving the 2% of total energy being generated by intermittent sources.


Technological solutions are always the "answer," but the actual costs of scaling up new technologies to offset the decline in conventional oil is ignored or glossed over.


If scaling up a new energy source bankrupts consumers and producers alike, is it a solution?


Magical Thinking: Debt Doesn’t Matter


The other line of magical thinking is that debt doesn’t matter, because future growth will always provide us with enough income to service debt.  As noted above, the structural stagnation of earned income means this assumption is no longer valid.


The next line of defense is that super-low interest rates will make debt practically weightless.  But back in the real world, we find even interest rates near zero eventually burden governments and economies. Consider Japan, which has been running a 25+ year experiment in “debt doesn’t matter.” In 2015, the cost of servicing its astronomical debt was the largest single item in the government’s budget:



If this is the result of near-zero .1% interest rates, imagine the eventual impact of 1% or (gasp) 2% interest rates—never mind 4% or higher.


Let’s also consider the central bank balance sheet and policy that undergirds this hyper-expansion of debt.  This is a chart of the Bank of Japan’s balance sheet. If this looks sustainable to you, hmm, you might want to dial back your happy-meds:



And what good came of this unprecedented expansion of central bank “monetary easing”? The net result is a near-zero growth stagnant economy burdened with exploding debt remained glued together, arguably rescued not by the central bank but by the collapse of energy prices and the one-off expansion of China’s economy.


These realities force fact-based observers into pondering a future that consumes less energy per person and generates less income and debt per person--a DeGrowth economy.


The status quo—highly centralized, dominated by self-serving elites gorging on a highly unequal distribution of wealth and income--cannot survive a structural decline in earned income and the resulting collapse of debt, or a reduction in energy consumption per capita.  But humanity could do just fine.



In Part 2: A Blueprint For DeGrowth, we provide the blueprint for a DeGrowth economy that’s more sustainable than the status quo, and that leaves magical thinking at the door.


The economic/political paradigm of rising energy consumption and debt required to keep the whole status quo glued together is going away.  We can’t retain the existing socio-political-financial structures of this paradigm and expect to get different results; that’s a pretty good definition of insanity.


We need new models; not just for energy consumption and distribution, but for the creation and distribution of currency and political power. The good news is: they"re out there.


Click here to read the report (free executive summary, enrollment required for full access)

BofA Stunned By Drop In Gasoline Demand: "Where Is Driving Season?"

Exactly six months ago, when oil bulls still held on to some fleeting hope that OPEC may somehow stabilize the crash in oil prices despite the shift in marginal oil production from low-cost OPEC producers to US shale (a hope which is now gone as the just disclosed letter from Andy Hall demonstrates), Goldman noticed something troubling: an unprecedented collapse in gasoline demand. As the firm"s energy analyst Damien Courvalin said on February 8, when discussing the 6% fall in US gasoline demand, such a plunge "would require a US recession" and add that "implied demand data points to US gasoline demand in January declining 460 kb/d or 5.2% year-on-year. In the absence of a base effect, such a decline has only occurred in four periods since 1960 during which time PCE contracted."


Now, 6 months later, the situation is very much different: with the US now inside peak summer driving season, the cyclical drivers behind gasoline supply and demand are vastly different, and yet something has remained the same: gasoline demand in the US simply refuses to rebound, surprising analysts by how weak it is. So weak, in fact, that Bank of America has released a note which, like Goldman half a year ago, reveals confusion about why - if the economy is indeed strong -  demand hasn"t kept up and has prompted BofA"s energy analyst Francisco Blanch to ask "where is the driving season?" and, more specifically, "is this year"s driving season over before it began?"


Here"s why some of the biggest banks continue to be amazed at the relentless failure of gasoline demand to validate an economic recovery, courtesy of BofA:





Gasoline demand is extremely price-elastic



In a U-turn from the last two years, when demand growth for gasoline was running at phenomenal speed, gasoline consumption in the Atlantic Basin has fallen by 1% on last year. In the US, lower demand growth seems largely a function of higher retail gasoline prices, underscoring how extremely price elastic oil demand is (Chart 1). Annual growth in miles driven has slowed to 1.5% from 3.4% in the same period last year. Higher prices are turning people back on to smaller and more fuel-efficient cars, reviving the well-established trend prior to 2015. Sales growth for SUVs, which averaged 7% YoY in 2016, has now slowed to 2%, allowing fuel efficiency gains in the US fleet to come through more forcefully (Chart 2). More recently, slowing employment growth, as well as a slowdown in construction activity, may have also played a marginal role.



 



Is this year"s summer driving season over before it began?



But the latest weekly data is somewhat disconcerting. Despite a sequential pick-up, gasoline demand is 180 thousand b/d, or 1.8%, down on the same four-week period last year. Gasoline demand in the US tends to reach a peak around the July 4th weekend, when Americans drive for pleasure, and then declines sharply between mid-August and late September, which is what creates the seasonality in the gasoline futures curve. But, increasingly, one has to wonder whether the summer driving season is already over before it has even begun (Chart 3)? Indeed, RBOB gasoline relative to US diesel prices has collapsed in recent weeks and is now trading near parity (Chart 4).





In other words, while the reasons may be different, the structural gasoline demand malaise that was first observed in the start of the year has persisted half a year later. Who knows: maybe, just maybe the failure of oil prices to stage any rebound just might have something to do with this lack of end demand.


Big picture considerations aside, Bank of America sees little - if anything - to be excited about in gasoline"s near-term and no to near-term future, mostly as a result of gasoline demand weakening not only in the US, but also globally, with distillates close behind:





While the gasoline market may find some temporary support on a demand improvement, elevated exports and inventory declines, we still see little structural tightness ahead. This year has seen a number of gasoline-geared refinery expansions in Asia, which is supporting gasoline supply. At the same time, the price-driven boost to demand is disappearing, with gasoline demand weakening globally, while distillate demand growth may play catch up. On our estimates, global gasoline refinery utilization rates are set to fall quite sharply this year and in 2018, likely taking the wind out of the sails behind gasoline cracks (Chart 26). In our view, winter gasoline cracks are likely to see further downside. True, crack timespreads currently stand at the bottom of the range, but should weaken post summer (Chart 27). Gasoline cracks are likely to see further downside and we expect diesel to reclaim a more typical pronounced premium to gasoline this winter.





The bad news is not over, however, as "any mid-to-late-summer rally in gasoline, if it materializes, is unlikely to be sustainable. Simply because there is a lot of work left in draining gasoline inventories before the end of the driving season. Contrary to common wisdom, gasoline stocks are anything but tight in the Atlantic Basin, even relative to both demand and exports. Flagging refinery utilization rates in places like LatAm or Africa have increased demand on other regions to run harder, in part explaining why US crude runs recently pushed to a record level, while European runs are also elevated. After the summer, gasoline cracks are likely to see further downside and we expect diesel to reclaim a more typical pronounced premium to gasoline this winter."


And while the future for RBOB is certainly not bright - especially now that even the biggest crude bulls have thrown in the towel - with a new deflationary wave likely imminent and set to spoil the central banks" reflationary party yet again, a bigger question, as both Goldman and now BofA pose, is what is going on with gasoline demand: is it more efficient cars, is it a reduction in miles driven, or is it simply that the US consumer continues to contract, between declining real wages and deteriorating labor market conditions, with gasoline demand just one of the very few undoctored indicators giving a glimpse into the true state of US consumption?


Whatever the answer, the same stagnant demand that stunned Goldman in February is now "shocking" Bank of America. At what point will these, and other banks, finally connect the dots that this is not some "one-time, non-recurring" event.