Showing posts with label terror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label terror. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 3, 2017

‘Doomsday Preacher’ On Train Scares Passengers


doomsday-preacher


When a man with a rucksack began reading what appeared to be excerpts from the Old Testament, train passengers began to get frightened.  This caused hundreds of thousands of commuters to experience major travel disruptions and delays during rush hour on Monday morning in London.


When the train stopped at a red light outside the south-west London rail station, a “doomsday preacher” began reading. The incident, which took place at about 8:30 am just outside Wimbledon station on a South Western Railway train running from Shepperton to Waterloo, forced Network Rail to switch off power in the area, causing long delays.


“He was quite well spoken and calm,” said Ian O’Sullivan, a witness, and fellow train passenger. “He said, ‘Ladies and gentlemen, I’d like to talk to you about something and that something is the word of the Lord, Jesus Christ. He’s here to heal your sins. The Bible tells you that homosexuality is a sin and sex before marriage is a sin. You need to repent.’”  Other witnesses also said that the man talked about “doomsday” and the “afterlife.”




Although O’Sullivan didn’t find the “doomsday preacher” to be any sort of a threat, others apparently did. “It suddenly became a Chinese whisper and [there was] panic,” he said. “It was quite a full train, but the area around him was suddenly quite empty.”



“We could hear a woman [outside] saying there’s a man and he’s going to kill everybody,” he said. “But everybody in the carriage said he never said that.”


He said the guard came to the carriage, spoke to the now “sheepish” man and searched his bag, but found only a water flask and books.


“The guard did a brilliant job of trying to keep things under control,” O’Sullivan said. “He established pretty quickly that there wasn’t a threat.” -The Guardian



Many evacuated the train out of fear, after prying open the doors, and the guard had to allegedly tell people not to touch the rails while standing on the tracks or they could die.




No one knows what happened to the “doomsday preacher,” however.  He seems to have vanished in the melee after causing hours long delays.



Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.

Gas Masks, Filters, Body Suits, Anti Radiation Pills

Please Spread The Word And Share This Post






Author: Mac Slavo
Views: Read by 1 people
Date: October 3rd, 2017
Website: www.SHTFplan.com


Copyright Information: Copyright SHTFplan and Mac Slavo. This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.shtfplan.com. Please contact us for permission to reproduce this content in other media formats.


Sunday, September 17, 2017

US Coalition Announces They’ll Defend ISIS by Attacking Syrian Army if They Go After Them

isis

Syria — In a blatantly ominous move—solidifying the notion that the U.S. military machine supports and sustains the proliferation of ISIS—U.S.-backed rebels openly stated they will prevent the Syrian army from crossing the Euphrates River to recover eastern Syria from ISIS militants.


The oil-rich province of Deir al-Zor is Islamic State’s last major foothold in Syria and Iraq. It is bisected by the Euphrates River. The threats by the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to attack the Syrian army for attempting to cross the river is in de facto defense of ISIS.


As Reuters reports, military council commander Ahmed Abu Khawla warned government forces and their militia allies against firing across the river as his fighters close in — something he said had happened in recent days.


“Now we have 3 km between us and the eastern riverbank, once our forces reach the area, any shot fired into that area we will consider an attack on the military council,” he said.


“We have notified the regime and Russia that we are coming to the Euphrates riverbank, and they can see our forces advancing,” he said. “We do not allow the regime or its militias to cross to the eastern riverbank.”


As we’ve seen this year, when the Assad regime is allowed to go after ISIS, they are successful. When the US is not destroying their military bases or shooting down its jets, the Syrian army has proven that they are quite capable of taking back their country from the clutch of terrorists.


Advertisment



Because the US can’t complete their mission of destabilizing Syria without ISIS, the announcement by the SDF to protect the terrorist-held region should come as no surprise.



READ MORE:  U.S. War on Terror Defined: Video Shows Opposing Groups Both Using US-Supplied Weapons



However, that point may be moot because according to Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, the Syrian Army has already crossed.


“The suburbs of this provincial center (Deir al-Zor) have been liberated. Advance units have successfully crossed the Euphrates and are holding positions on its eastern bank,” she said.


SDF’s Abu Khawla answered Russia’s claim by immediately denouncing it as “mere propaganda,” adding that “no one has crossed.”


Bouthaina Shaaban, an aide to Assad, said they are ready to fight the SDF to free the rest of their country.



“Whether it’s the Syrian Democratic Forces, or Daesh (Islamic State) or any illegitimate foreign force in the country … we will fight and work against them so our land is freed completely from any aggressor,” she said in an interview with Hezbollah’s Al Manar TV.


“I‘m not saying this will happen tomorrow … but this is the strategic intent,” she said.


As TFTP has consistently reported, it is no secret that much of the opposition forces in Syria, like the SDF, are aligned with ISIS. In fact, there was actually proposed in legislation by Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard in the House and Senator Rand Paul in the Senate to stop arming the US-backed rebels—because they are terrorists.


“For years, our government has been providing both direct and indirect support to these armed militant groups, who are working directly with or under the command of terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, all in their effort and fight to overthrow the Syrian government,” Gabbard said earlier this year.




READ MORE:  Sheriff Arrested for Assaulting Innocent 77yo Woman, Using Stingray to Spy on Judge — Still Sheriff



As the Free Thought Project reported in April, the US knew Al-Qaeda leader al-Zawahiri called on Muslims in Turkey and the Middle East to aid the rebels in the Free Syrian Army. From this day forward, the lines between who Al-Qaeda or the ‘rebels’ actually were — became heavily blurred. But, according to the email, the state department did not care as they knew Al-Qaeda was on their side.


As the email states:



UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05789138 Date: 10/30/2015 AL-ZAWAHIRI URGES MUSLIM SUPPORT FOR OPPOSITION (U) Al-Qaida leader al-Zawahiri called on Muslims in Turkey and the Middle East to aid rebel forces in their fight against supporters of Syrian President Asad in an interne video recording. Al-Zawahiri also urged the Syrian people not to rely on the AL, Turkey, or the United States for assistance.euters)



Once this wire went out to multiple departments in the form of an Ops Alert, apparently there may have been some original concern about Al-Qaeda joining the ranks of the US-supported rebels — who are being used by the American Deep State to destabilize Syria on behalf of special interests. However, Sullivan quickly replied to his master, Hillary Clinton, to let her know that Al-Qaeda “is on our side in Syria.”


syria


In spite of Trump ending the CIA’s program of funding and arming ISIS in Syria, the Pentagon was exposed using backdoors to continue their support for the terrorist network.


As TFTP reported, a damning new report by the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN) and the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), published this week, exposes the Pentagon’s falsifying of documents – likely to hide the use of a shady network of private arms dealers, intimately connected to Eastern European organized crime groups, to transfer some $2.2 billion dollars worth of mostly old Soviet weaponry to al-Qaeda affiliates in Syria.



READ MORE:  The CIA Has Given So Many Weapons to Syrian Jihadis, ISIS is Now Selling Them on Facebook



Sadly, the funds flowing to Syria to support terror are whitewashed and justified by the government because they are aiding “moderate rebels” in their battle against Assad.


However, as Congresswoman Gabbard noted, who actually went to Syria to see for herself, there are no moderate rebels.


“The reality is… every place that I went, every person that I spoke to, I asked this question to them, and without hesitation, they said, there are no moderate rebels. Who are these moderate rebels that people keep speaking of?



Regardless of the name of these groups, the strongest fighting force on the ground in Syria is al Nusra, or al-Qaeda and ISIS. That is a fact,” Gabbard said.

Monday, September 11, 2017

9/11 remembrance: POTUS and FLOTUS observe moment of silence







WASHINGTON (INTELLIHUB) — President Donald Trump along with the First Lady Melania and others gathered at the White House Monday morning where they took a moment of silence in remembrance of the victims of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks which occurred 16-years ago.


After the ceremony, President Trump spoke about how “our whole world changed” when that first plane struck the tower.


“This was an attack on civilians,” the President said. “Innocent men, women, and children who’s lives were taken so needlessly.”


A total of “2,977 innocent souls […] were murdered by terrorists […] on that terrible, terrible day,” he said.


Featured Image: Screencapture via The White House/YouTube

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.




Children Held Hostage During Disturbing 9/11 Drill by School Official Threatening to Kill Them

drill

Honolulu, HI — In America’s modern-day police state, it seems the state knows no bounds as to how far it will go to keep children and adults in a perpetual state of fear. A recent lawsuit out of Hawaii illustrates the extent of the American fear culture and how its insanity is tormenting and traumatizing America’s youth.


For more than 10 minutes, middle school children were held hostage by a raging lunatic in a mask, swinging a hammer while threatening to kill them all. Naturally, officials claim this drill, involving a school official wearing a mask and holding a hammer while threatening to kill children, was done for the “safety of those children.” Well, Michelle and Eddie Chavez aren’t buying that excuse.


According to a report from Courthouse News, the couple has since filed a federal lawsuit over this incident.


Advertisment




An abusive lockdown drill in which a masked man threatened a middle-school classroom with a hammer left the entire class in tears and at least one girl with post-traumatic stress disorder, her parents say in court.


Michelle and Eddie Chavis sued Hawaii and the state Department of Education on Sept. 7 in First Circuit state Court.


According to the bizarre complaint, their daughter and her class at Kaimuki Middle were watching a video about the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2015. Suddenly, “a man wearing a mask rushed into the classroom swinging a large hammer while threatening the students with serious bodily injury and/or death,” the complaint states.


The complaint continues: “Minor and her classmates were immediately placed in fear for their lives. The masked man then walked out of the classroom with the classroom teacher running out behind the masked man, apparently in pursuit of the masked man. Upon the classroom teacher’s return, the teacher locked the classroom doors and called the school office to notify the school administration of the masked man.


“Minor and other students in the classroom were crying and feared for their lives, as they believed they were going to be killed. The classroom teacher was pacing around the classroom and appeared scared, as well.”


Only then, the parents say, did the school administration announce that it was a lockdown drill, planned ahead of time, “to be as realistic as possible.”


The Chavis’s daughter already had been under the case of a psychologist for two years, and the school knew it, they say. She continues to suffer from the stress of the drill, and post-traumatic stress syndrome.


Her parents seek damages and special damages for negligence, breach of duty of care, personal injuries, medical expenses and loss of enjoyment of life.


They are represented by Harrison Kiehm.



After the drill first became public in 2015, school officials were quick to defend the decision. In response to an inquiry from KHON 2 news, the Department of Education released a statement at the time noting, “Safety drills provide real-life situations where schools can analyze areas of strengths and weaknesses. In order to accomplish this, students are not notified when a drill will take place.”



READ MORE:  Education in a Police State: Schools Across US Firing Guidance Counselors -- Opt for Cops Instead



According to KHON, the principal at Kaimuki Middle School told KHON2 sometimes they do notify students about these lockdown drills and sometimes they don’t, and they don’t plan on changing that because they want to make sure they know how students will react during these very different situations.



According to psychologist Dr. Suzanne Gelb, however, these experiences “can be very devastating. It can result in nightmares. It can be a result in a resurgence of problem behaviors that maybe were taken care of already, like rebelliousness, acting out.” Many of the parents whose children witnessed this drill agree.


Parents, who did not want to be identified, told KHON2 their kids were in tears and terrorized by the scene.



“(My child has had) sleepless nights since it’s happened, very anxious, concerned about going to school,” one parent said.


The student said at least six kids in her class were crying during the drill.


Another parent said her daughter “was afraid, and she was crying, and another friend was crying as well, and they thought they were going to die.”


What, exactly, the school was attempting to ‘teach’ the kids with this drill remains to be seen. No lessons were learned and the end result was simply a long list of traumatized children.

Friday, September 1, 2017

Petition to Declare George Soros a ‘Terrorist’ & Seize His Assets Gains 70k Signatures

petition

Washington, D.C. — (RT) In less than a fortnight, more than 70,000 people have signed a petition accusing billionaire investor George Soros of sedition against the US and demanding that he and his affiliates be declared “domestic terrorists” and that his assets be seized.



The petition was initially launched on August 20 by “E.B.” on the White House petitions website and has gained more than 70,500 signatures as of Friday morning. If it reaches the threshold of 100,000 signatures before September 19, the White House will have to provide a formal response.


The creators of the petition on the website ‘We the People’ say that Soros has “willfully” tried to “destabilize and otherwise commit acts of sedition against the United States and its citizens.” To achieve these goals, the author says, “Soros has created multiple organizations with a sole purpose is to apply Alinsky model terrorist tactics to destroy the US government.”


Advertisment




Read more



© Rodrigo Garcia / Global Look Press




The “Alinsky model” refers to American community organizer and writer Saul Alinsky. In his book ‘Rules for Radicals,’ he outlines 13 rules for political struggle to seize power.


The petition calls on the Department of Justice to “immediately declare George Soros and all of his organizations and staff members to be domestic terrorists, and have all of his personal an organizational wealth and assets seized under Civil Asset Forfeiture law.”



Another recent high-profile petition, which has already exceeded the 100,000-signature threshold by three times, calls on US President Donald Trump to classify the Antifa activist group as a terrorist organization, accusing them of violence at demonstrations and incitement to kill police.



READ MORE:  Trump Chooses "Lawlessness Over Justice"—Pardons Convicted Sheriff Joe Arpaio



The White House, however, has left almost a dozen petitions unanswered since Donald Trump took office in February, and is considering shutting the service down.


George Soros is a Hungarian-American billionaire with a net worth of $25 billion and 33rd richest man in the world, according to Forbes. The 87-year-old investing heavyweight is behind many organizations and projects, some of which have been the target of criticism for years. His Open Society Foundation, along with USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy, have been accused of fomenting color revolutions to install governments friendly to the US – from Serbia in 2000 to Ukraine in 2014.



Monday, August 28, 2017

ANTIFA terrorists savagely attack, beat, non-violent Trump supporters at rally


... pour urine on them






BERKLEY, Calif. (INTELLIHUB) — ANTIFA thugs were caught on camera assaulting Donald Trump supporters at Sunday’s “cancelled” rally where many were arrested.


Not only did members of the George Soros-backed terror group assault various Trump supporters who were attending the ‘peaceful protest’ dubbed “No Marxism in America,” they poured urine on them as well.


Josh Caplan reports: “#Antifa beat and pour urine on Trump supporter at #Berkeley.”




Here is a clip of a Trump supporter being savagely beaten by ANTIFA thugs.


https://twitter.com/DBloom451/status/901917760044892161


And…


https://twitter.com/PoliticalShort/status/901915055213625344


Featured Image: Screen capture via @DBloom451/Twitter

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.




Monday, June 19, 2017

Tyranny in Britain

Tyranny in Britain | british-flag | Special Interests World News


In 2015 as home secretary, Theresa May introduced draconian investigatory powers legislation, authorizing enhanced surveillance – on the phony pretext of combating terrorism ruling Tories support.


Sacrificing fundamental freedoms for greater security assures losing both, May at it again as prime minister – ahead of June 8 snap elections.



“I’ll rip up human rights laws that impede new terror legislation,” she roared, her declaration coming 36 hours before polls open.


Muslims are enemies of choice in America, Britain and other European countries, justifying the unjustifiable, waging war OF terror, not on it as claimed.


May favors greater domestic war on Muslims living in Britain, including the right to deport alleged terrorist suspects, even without evidence suggesting it.


In an effort to bolster her sagging support pre-election, she said “I can tell you a few of the things I mean, (urging) longer prison sentences for people convicted of terrorist offenses.”



“I mean making it easier for the authorities to deport foreign terror suspects to their own countries.”


“And I mean doing more to restrict the freedom and the movements of terrorist suspects when we have enough evidence to know they present a threat, but not enough evidence to prosecute them in full.”


“And if human rights laws stop us from doing it, we will change those laws so we can do it.”



Britain already has draconian tools in place, headed by so-called Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures (TPIMs), enhanced for added toughness in September 2011.


They permit forced relocation of individuals to government-owned accommodations elsewhere in the country, based solely on suspicions, nothing indicating they pose a threat – an extrajudicial practice grossly infringing on fundamental civil liberties.


In March 2005, so-called control orders were instituted – a social control system placing suspects under virtual house arrest, including restrictions on movement, association and employment, along with electronic tagging. Forced relocation is permitted.


These orders were issued in closed court hearings, individuals affected and their lawyers not allowed to attend – punishing people unfairly, denying them due process, based on secret “evidence” not subject to appeal.


This practice undermines judicial fairness, the presumption of innocence unless proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt denied – the defining feature of police state governance.


Control orders were later struck down judicially and abandoned. May wants TPIMs toughened, restoring some or perhaps all abhorrent practices control orders authorized – making Britain more of a police state than already.


Earlier promising not to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (1950), perhaps Tories now have second thoughts.



They could amend or replace the 1998 UK Human Rights Act. Following last Saturday’s London Bridge/Borough Market attack, May promised to introduce new anti-terrorism laws, without elaboration.


In response, Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said “(i)n her years as home secretary, she was willing to offer up the police for cut after cut.”



“We have been here before. A kind of nuclear arms race in terror laws might give the appearance of action, but what the security services lack is not more power, but more resources. And responsibility for that lies squarely with Theresa May.”



For the moment, focus is on Thursday’s snap elections, polls suggesting a possible hung parliament, coalition governance needed if things turn out this way.


If Tories retain power individually or with a hardline partner, Britain looks headed toward becoming more of a police state than already.


Perhaps other European countries and America will follow the same path.

Friday, May 26, 2017

Dear UK: Your Government Already Let the Terrorists Win — but Not How You Think

(ANTIMEDIA Op-Ed) In the aftermath of the gruesome Manchester bombing, which killed 22 people Monday evening, the British government rushed to the rescue, deploying soldiers into the streets of the U.K. in the name of guaranteeing security.





But as the country’s government purports to protect its citizens, it has already proven its incompetence many times over — and it let the terrorists win long before this week. According to a report published Thursday by the Telegraph, British authorities had the suicide bomber, Abed Salman Abedi, in their grasp five times before he blew himself up at a concert Monday evening.



Sources suggest that authorities were informed of the danger posed by Abedi on at least five separate occasions in the five years prior to the attack on Monday night,” the outlet reported, also adding that “authorities were also aware that Abedi’s father was linked to a well-known militant Islamist group in Libya, which is proscribed in Britain. Abedi also had links to several British-based jihadis with Isil connections.”







People who knew Abedi had called the government’s anti-terrorism hotline to report concerns about his radicalism.


They had been worried that ‘he was supporting terrorism’ and had expressed the view that ‘being a suicide bomber was ok,’ a source told the BBC,” as noted by the Telegraph. Further, a community leader “said that Abedi was reported two years ago ‘because he thought he was involved in extremism and terrorism.’”


Despite all the clear signs Abedi posed a threat, the British government failed to prevent him from planning and executing the attack (this is also a common theme with U.S. intelligence agencies, which have shrugged off legitimate threats only to have suspects go on to commit attacks). This is the same government now claiming to hold British citizens’ safety in the highest regard.







The U.K. government’s failures are even more glaring considering the British government has one of the most extensive surveillance systems in the world. The country has one surveillance camera for every eleven people. It has sweeping mass spying capabilities. Last year, Parliament passed the Investigatory Powers Act, a sweeping anti-privacy bill that, as the Guardian reported, “legalise[d] a whole range of tools for snooping and hacking by the security services unmatched by any other country in western Europe or even the US.”


After its passage, whistleblower Edward Snowden remarked that “The UK has just legalised the most extreme surveillance in the history of western democracy. It goes further than many autocracies.”


This bill legalized spying powers the government had already been using, largely in tandem with the United States government’s surveillance apparatus. Lawmakers passed the bill without making any substantial concessions to privacy advocates, thanks in part to widespread fears of terror attacks.


Upon the Investigatory Powers Act’s passage, Jim Killock, executive director of Open Rights Group, said:


The UK now has a surveillance law that is more suited to a dictatorship than a democracy. The state has unprecedented powers to monitor and analyse UK citizens’ communications regardless of whether we are suspected of any criminal activity.”


And still, the government failed to stop Abedi. As Ron Paul’s Liberty Report observed after the Manchester bombing, “All individuals in the UK gave up their liberty for security, and as Ben Franklin warned, they ended up with neither.


Prime Minister Theresa May, who advocated the passage of the bill when she was Home Secretary, has made grandiose statements about the barbarism of the terror attack but has taken no responsibility for her government’s failure to adequately use the invasive, rights-violating tools at its disposal to ‘do its job.’


Instead, May is implying that further U.K. and N.A.T.O. intervention in Syria is a solution to preventing more attacks on British soil. Unsurprisingly, absent from her condemnations of the terror attack were any acknowledgments that the U.K. has armed and empowered the oppressive Saudi Arabian regime, which exports radical Islam and almost certainly funds ISIS, the terror group increasingly implicated in Monday’s carnage.


Her advocacy of further intervention is indisputably the worst possible course of action considering Abedi’s sister, Jomana Abedi, disclosed to the Wall Street Journal that Abedi was specifically resentful toward Western airstrikes in Syria. “I think he saw children – Muslim children – dying everywhere, and wanted revenge,” she said. If she’s correct, he can be added to the growing list of terrorists who have cited Western intervention in the Middle East as the main driver in their radicalization. The Orlando shooter, Boston bombers, and Charlie Hebdo shooters all decried Western wars in the region.


Further, the British government also participated in the 2011 ousting of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, where Abedi visited just weeks prior to inflicting the attack. Libya became a hotbed of terrorist activity after Western governments ousted Middle Eastern the dictator from power and to this day hosts a broad range of terror groups from ISIS to al-Qaeda. The West has also spent vast resources arming al-Qaeda-affiliated groups, further bolstering the proliferation of terrorism.


Regardless, it’s safe to say that no matter one’s perspective on why Abedi committed the attack, the evidence suggests the British government has failed in its responsibility to protect its citizenry. As it attempts to seize even more power and encroach even further on individuals’ civil liberties, it appears more of the same tactics will only encourage further attacks.


Opinion / Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo






Sunday, May 7, 2017

Racist Fresno killer shouted Allahu Akbar, specifically targeted whites during shooting spree

(INTELLIHUB) — The 39-year-old suspect in the Fresno shooting spree that left three dead and one in critical condition was an anti-white propagandist who called whites the devil on social media while telling his family that he believed a war between races was on the horizon.


Kori Ali Muhammad randomly opened fire on four different white males, hitting three and missing the fourth, before being taken into custody after he was spotted by officers and dove to the ground shouting “Ali Akbar”.


Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer told the local media that he did not believe the case was terrorism related despite the clear references but that the evidence so far indicates a hate crime.


“If in fact he’s lashing out at white people, white males in this case, that would constitute a hate crime,” Dyer said. “We believe it is a hate crime, definitely a hate crime.”


According to a report by the LA Times, Muhammad has a detailed social media history that includes direct references to black nationalism and numerous attacks on the “white devils”.


“A Facebook profile page for a Kori Ali Muhammad from Fresno paid homage to black pride and black nationalism, with images of the red, green and black Pan-African flag and a raised fist,” reported the Times.


“The rambling profile includes militant and apocalyptic language and repeated demands to “let black people go.” He referenced “white devils” and praised melanoma skin cancer.”



On Saturday afternoon, Muhammad posted a photo of himself in a colorful garment, with his head covered, and the words: “LET BLACK PEOPLE GO OR THE DOOM INCREASES REPARATIONS & SEPARATION NOW.”


On Monday he wrote: “MY KILL RATE INCRESASES TREMENDOUSLY ON THE OTHER SIDE ASÈ ALLAH U AKBAR.”



It will certainly be interesting to see the response in the liberal mainstream media to this horrific attack as it is basically the exact opposite of the narrative they usually push.


Alex Thomas is an opinion journalist and editor for Intellihub News. He was a founding member of what later became Intellihub.com and an integral part of the team that destroyed the mainstream media blockade on Bilderberg in 2012. You can contact him here.

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.

Friday, May 5, 2017

ISIS’ Next Plan Involves U.S. Gun Shows

ISIS’ Next Plan Involves U.S. Gun Shows


The terror masterminds at ISIS are urging their followers to adopt a horrific new tactic: Buy weapons at U.S. gun shows and use them to take innocent people hostage.


A gun show purchase would allow them to get around background checks.


“Ideal target locations for hostage-taking scenarios include night clubs, movie theaters, busy shopping malls and large stores, popular restaurants, concert halls, university campuses, public swimming pools, indoor ice skating rinks, and generally any busy en­closed area,” an article in the May 4 edition of the ISIS online magazine Rumiyah recommends.


Rumiyah is used to instruct ISIS sympathizers and lone-wolf terrorists in the art of wreaking havoc.


The Self-Defense And Hunting Weapon That Doesn’t Require A Firearms License!


“Such an environment allows for one to take control of the situation by rounding up the kuf­far (nonbelievers) present inside and allows one to massacre them while using the building as a natural defense against any responding force attempting to enter and bring the operation to a quick halt,” the text continues.


Another frightening recommendation is to place a fake job ad to lure a person to a remote location so they can be killed or taken hostage. Non-Muslim men in countries such as the United States seem to be ISIS’ target of choice.


“As an example, one might advertise a job vacancy that Muslims would not seek, or that may only appeal to men,” Rumiyah recommends.


Other methods of luring innocent people to their deaths include advertising rooms for rent on eBay Listings and Craigslist ads.


The Middle East Media Research Institute’s Jihad & Terrorism Threat Monitor speculated that ISIS wants to recruit Muslims in the West to commit such atrocities. The murders would be in retaliation for the recent military setbacks the group has suffered on the battlefield.


What is your reaction? Share it in the section below:

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

800 families file lawsuit against Saudi Arabia over 9/11

New York, NY — Eight-hundred families of 9/11 victims and 1,500 first responders, along with others who suffered as a result of the attacks, have filed a lawsuit against Saudi Arabia over its alleged complicity in the 2001 terror attacks, according to an exclusive report by local New York outlet Pix 11.


The legal document, filed in a federal court in Manhattan, describes the Saudi role in the attacks. Pix 11 reports:


The document details how officials from Saudi embassies supported hijackers Salem al-Hazmi and Khalid Al-Mihdhar 18 months before 9/11.


The officials allegedly helped them find apartments, learn English and obtain credit cards and cash. The documents state that the officials helped them learn how to blend into the American landscape.”


For years, suspicions have swirled that some Saudi officials had ties to the gruesome attacks. The recent release of FBI reports produced shortly after the attacks provided details to justify growing skepticism against the Saudis. These details were further bolstered by the release of 28 pages originally withheld from the 9/11 commission report. Though the U.S. government downplayed the findings, even some lawmakers expressed concern.


Pix 11 further described the lawsuit, which reportedly relies on information from the FBI’s investigations:


The suit also produces evidence that officials in the Saudi embassy in Germany supported lead hijacker Mohamed Atta. It claims that a Saudi official was in the same hotel in Virginia with several hijackers the night before the attacks.


The suit also alleges “some of the hijackers had special markers in their passports, identifying them as al-Qaida sympathizers.


According to the suit, filed by aviation law firm Kreindler & Kreindler, “Saudi royals, who for years had been trying to curry favor with fundamentalists to avoid losing power, were aware that funds from Saudi charities were being funneled to al-Qaida.


The charities were alter egos of the Saudi government,” Jim Kreindler told Pix 11.


According to Kreindler, “there was a direct link between all the charities and Osama bin Laden and…they operated with the full knowledge of Saudi officials.”


The lawsuit reportedly details how funds were transferred from charities inside Saudi Arabia to the terror group. One of those charities, Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, has been designated a sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. government.


Kreindler insists Saudi involvement occurred and was blatantly malicious.


The Saudis were so duplicitous,” he said. “They claim to be allies fighting with U.S. against Iran, while at the same time working with the terrorists. There’s no question they had a hand in the 9/11 attacks.”


Via Anti-Media


Featured Image: Wajahat Mahmood/Flickr

Saturday, February 25, 2017

Bill Gates: ‘Bioterror is far scarier than nuclear war and a bigger threat’

MUNICH, Germany (INTELLIHUB) — Billionaire and founder of Microsoft Bill Gates briefed world leaders and others at the Munich Security Conference last Saturday on emerging megatrends which Gates said could lead to the demise of the human race.


Gates told Vice President Michael Pence and other attendees that bioterrorism would be far more deadly than a nuclear war by comparison.


“The next epidemic could originate on the computer screen of a terrorist intent on using genetic engineering to create a synthetic version of the smallpox virus, or a super contagious and deadly strain of the flu,” Gates told officials. “Getting ready for a global pandemic is every bit as important as nuclear deterrence and avoiding a climate catastrophe.”


Before his speech, the richest man in the world told the Telegraph that although natural epidemics have been known to be deadly, “intentionally caused epidemics, bioterrorism, would be the” deadliest of all.



“With nuclear weapons, you’d think you would probably stop after killing 100million. Smallpox won’t stop. Because the population is naïve, and there are no real preparations. That, if it got out and spread, would be a larger number.”



According to Gates, breakthrough advancements in the genetic engineering field have made it easy for just about any science-savvy person to develop a bioweapon.


(Ad) Have You Ever Considered a 4-Week Emergency Food Kit?



“Biology is making it way easier to create these things.”



bill gatesMaik Meid/Flickr

Gates said that he anticipates such an event to occur within the next 15 years.



“Whether it occurs by a quirk of nature or at the hand of a terrorist, epidemiologists say a fast-moving airborne pathogen could kill more than 30 million people in less than a year. And they say there is a reasonable probability the world will experience such an outbreak in the next 10 to 15 years”



[…]



“You might be wondering how real these doomsday scenarios really are. The fact that a deadly global pandemic has not occurred in recent history shouldn’t be mistaken for evidence that a deadly pandemic will not occur in the future. And even if the next pandemic isn’t on the scale of the 1918 flu, we would be wise to consider the social and economic turmoil that might ensue if something like ebola made its way into urban centers.”



The Guardian reported that “US and UK intelligence agencies have said that Islamic State has been trying to develop biological weapons at its bases in Syria and Iraq,” but have “played down” the revelation order to quell any fears the general public may have.


All in all, Gates said that there has never been a better time for both governments and individuals to prepare.


Other Sources:


Superbugs, Climate Chaos Have Bill Gates and the UN Worried — Bloomberg


Bill Gates Warns That A Devastating Pandemic Is Right Around The Corner — Huffington Post


Shepard Ambellas is an opinion journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub News & Politics (Intellihub.com). Shepard is also known for producing Shade: The Motion Picture (2013) and appearing on Travel Channel’s America Declassified (2013). Shepard is a regular contributor to Infowars. Read more from Shep’s World. Get the Podcast. Follow Shep on Facebook and Twitter.

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.






Comment Policy: Threats of violence, foul language, bullying, and spam will not be tolerated and may be flagged.

Friday, February 17, 2017

Govt Engineer Found Guilty of Building an Army to Kill Muslims & Burn Mosque

Congressional candidate and former government engineer, Robert Doggart was convicted this week in U.S. District Court of recruiting people to burn down a mosque in a Muslim community in New York — and kill those who opposed it.


“Unless somebody goes up there and burns down their buildings and kills whoever opposes the burning down of those buildings, [Islamberg] is gonna do that,” Doggart, 65, said on a government-tapped line as he voiced his delusional fears about a peaceful Muslim community in New York.


Prosecutors had Doggart recorded in multiple damning calls and argued that the former Tennessee Valley Authority employee be convicted of one count of solicitation to commit a civil rights violation, one count of solicitation to commit arson of a building, and two counts of threat in interstate commerce.


Absent from the conviction, however, were any charges related to terrorism or the plotting of. Lawyers representing the Islamberg community, the target of Doggart’s deranged attack, claim a loophole in federal law allows defendants such as Doggart to escape terrorism charges.


“There’s a gap in the law,” lawyer Tahirah Amatul-Wadud told the NY Post. “Frankly, there is nothing on terrorism unless it’s connected to a foreign element. You won’t see the KKK charged with domestic terror even though that’s what they do.”


According to the Patriot Act, the freedom-stripping Orwellian-named set of laws passed in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, prosecutors can only charge a defendant with domestic terrorism if he or she had the intention to “intimidate” or “coerce” a civilian population, or influence the “policy of a government” to affect the conduct of government by “mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.”



READ MORE:  12 Cops Raid the House of a Mother and Daughter After Mistaking Her for a Male Fugitive



Arguably, Doggart was guilty of all these acts. “He did it to intimidate Muslims throughout the country – a civilian population – and acted as if he was going to be the world police, which is very anti-government,” said Ms. Amatul-Wadud.



According to the Times Free Press, during Doggart’s proceedings, attorneys for Islamberg reiterated their desire to have a federal charge that could apply to alleged domestic terrorists, like Dylann Roof, the convicted white supremacist who killed nine African-American churchgoers in South Carolina.


Attorney Tahirah Clark, who is representing the town of Islamberg in a lawsuit against Doggart, praised the jury’s courage, saying their verdict delivered a strong message to all Americans. “To sit there for a week and listen to this criminal, this terrorist, speak to others about killing our families, about burning down our village, that was very difficult I think the jury should be commended.”


However, likely due to his state connections, Doggart got off easy. Even with the audio, proving Doggart had been recruiting militiamen from across the country to help him carry out this attack, the jury almost forced a mistrial after being unable to reach a unanimous verdict.


“I don’t know when it’s going to happen,” Doggart said, “but it’s got to be —”, he was then cut off by one of his recruits, a militiaman from South Carolina, William Tint.


“I have two cousins that are captains in police departments out in New York as well,” Tint interjected, implicating police in the attack as well. “If you’re a man short, I will jog out there and stand by you.




READ MORE:  Largest Human Rights Group in the World Calls for Investigation into Chicago"s Police "Black Site"



“Senator Doggart, how do you feel about being my running mate?” Tint asked.


As the Times Free Press reports, Tint offered to provide 50 men from South Carolina and another 150 from New York, and said he had experience in demolitions, and agreed the men should meet.


Luckily, these men were stopped before they carried out this destruction and murder.


“Our nation cannot tolerate threats by those who are willing to kill innocent children, women, and men who do not share their religious beliefs or philosophy,” Nancy Harr, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, said in a statement.


As a result of the conviction, Doggart faces up to 10 years maximum on each of the four charges for which he will be sentenced on May 31.


What Doggart’s case illustrates and what is also backed up by loads of data, is the fact that far more Americans are targeting Muslims than Muslims are targeting Americans.





As Claire Bernish eloquently pointed out, Terrorism doesn’t practice one religion, or have a single nationality. It doesn’t have a specific appearance, gender, motivation, cause, or mindset.


You can’t fight terrorism by ignoring facts — and the fact is, we have our own terrorists. 



Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. and now on Steemit

Sunday, February 12, 2017

UK Moves One Step Closer to Orwell’s 1984 Nightmare

Carey Wedler
January 13, 2015







(ANTIMEDIA) In the United States, government officials responded to Apple and Droid’s new encryption services by throwing temper tantrums in speeches and making archaic arguments in court. In the United Kingdom, home of big brother and big brother to the U.S., they simply want to ban forms of communication they cannot intrude upon.


British Prime Minister David Cameron drew media attention this week when, in response to the Paris terrorist attacks, he said



“In our country, do we want to allow a means of communication between people which […] we cannot read?”








He is opposed to the reality that encrypted data on services like the iPhone’s iMessage (iPhone to iPhone texting) and international communication app “WhatsApp” cannot be accessed, even with a warrant, and suggested such tools should be outright banned. Droid operating systems would also fall into this category. Cameron’s statement has strong implications in implying that people should not be allowed to communicate unless the government is privy to it.


Cameron’s comments came as a part of a broader push for more state surveillance powers in the name of “safety.” Legislation
nicknamed the “snooper’s charter” was blocked previously by liberals in the British legislature, but Cameron is pouncing on the Charlie Hebdo tragedy to push for support in a newer version. He will re-introduce the bill if he wins the next general election, set for May of this year.


Director of Big Brother Watch, Emma Carr, condemned such a move:



“It is the wrong solution and would divert resources from focused surveillance operations at a time when
the agencies are already struggling to cope with the volume of information available.”



Since Edward Snowden’s leaks in 2013, there has been powerful opposition to state surveillance. However, many citizens
cower to privacy violations when global tragedies occur and lawmakers exploit the surrounding fear to expand state reach. It is difficult to believe that the British people would tolerate banning many of the world’s most common and convenient forms of text messaging, but Conservatives (Cameron’s party) are currently ahead in electoral polls. At


At the same time, the establishment’s preferences are strong and vocal. London’s Mayor Boris Johnson declared



“I’m not particularly interested in all this civil liberties stuff when it comes to these people’s emails and
mobile phone conversations. If they’re a threat to our society then I want them properly listened to.”



The ambiguity of words like “these people” and “threat,” however, are exactly why companies enhanced encryption features in the first place.



This article (UK Moves One Step Closer to Orwell’s 1984 Nightmare) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter to receive our latest articles.

Thursday, February 9, 2017

White House fires back at immigration order critics with list of terror arrests



White House fires back at immigration order critics with list of terror arrests







The White House moved Wednesday to counter critics who claim President Trump’s travel ban goes too far, circulating a list of terror cases involving suspects who came to the U.S. from the seven countries in question.


The list, obtained by Fox News, gave 24 examples of refugees and other immigrants from Somalia, Sudan, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Syria and Libya who have been arrested on terror-related charges; most have been convicted.


Those seven, mostly Muslim countries were singled out in Trump’s executive order, which suspended immigration for 90 days from those nations.


The document of terror arrests appears to be, in part, a rebuke to Seattle U.S. District Judge James Robart who, in questioning a Justice Department lawyer last week about the number of post-9/11 arrests of foreign nationals from those countries, incorrectly asserted: “Let me tell you … The answer to that is none, as best I can tell.”


Robart halted the rollout of the executive order. The case is now before the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, where Justice Department lawyers are arguing for the restoration of the measure.


The White House document itself names 10 individuals from Somalia, six from Iraq, one from Yemen, two from Sudan, two from Iran, two from Libya and one from Syria. The cases span the last eight years, and include most recently a case in June in which two Somali refugees were jailed for conspiring to commit murder in Syria on behalf of ISIS.


It also includes a case from March of last year, where a Yemeni native who became a U.S. citizen was sentenced to 22 years in prison for attempting to provide “material support” to ISIS and planning to shoot and kill members of the U.S. military who had returned from Iraq.


Read more at Fox News


John Roberts and Adam Shaw contributed to this report.


Photo credit: CNBC.com




Secret List of 24 Refugees Charged with Terrorism Revealed by Trump Administration




H/T Matt Bracken


Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com

Thursday, January 26, 2017

The U.S. Had a Plan to Topple All 7 Countries on Trump’s Refugee Ban List

January 25, 2017   |   Darius Shahtahmasebi




(ANTIMEDIA) According to Reuters, Donald Trump is set to sign an executive order that would include a temporary refugee ban on and a suspension of visas for citizens of Syria and six other Middle Eastern and African countries.


The list is expected to include Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. If those countries are starting to sound familiar, there’s a reason for that.



According to four-star General Wesley Clark, shortly after the attacks of 9/11, the Pentagon adopted a plan to topple the governments of seven countries; Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.



Although such a refugee ban is welcomed by many frightened Americans due to the overplayed hype that the media has reported on the threat of refugees sweeping into western nations, these Americans cannot turn their attention away from the hand America has had in creating these refugees in the first place.


Clark’s list of countries is not an irrelevant conspiracy theory. These countries have seen heavy interference from the United States in the last decade or so. In 2016, the country Obama bombed the most was Syria. The United States was spending approximately $1 billion a year assisting rebels who have known ties to al-Qaeda, the majority of whom share ISIS’ core belief system. The U.S. air war against ISIS has now cost American taxpayers over $11 billion. Iran is bound to Syria by a mutual defense agreement and has lost significant personnel in the battle. Iran has also taken full advantage of poor Afghans, recruiting them to fight in Syria.



Libya was destroyed in 2011 by NATO powers, an offensive in which the U.S. played the most integral role. The U.S. was backing jihadists who fought against the U.S. in Iraq to topple the Libyan regime (these fighters were later rebranded as ISIS). Even up until his last day in office, Obama was still bombing Libya (from Missouri, believe it or not.)


Obama bombed Somalia throughout his presidency. He not only relentlessly bombed Yemen, but he also supported the Saudi-led coalition’s brutal assault on Yemen’s civilian population. It could be argued that Trump is set to discontinue these practices, but so far, he is well on his track to rapidly pursuing them. In his first weekend since inauguration, his administration conducted a number of drone strikes in Yemen with no hint at a reversal of Obama’s policies, though his approval was not required for those particular strikes.


Further, is the American public even aware that American troops are stationed in Sudan? American troops can go there, but refugees fleeing a brutal conflict can’t come to the United States?



It’s not really clear why Iran is on the list, other than the fact that Trump opposes the Iranian nuclear deal and has a love affair with Israel, Iran’s number one nemesis. Internally, Iran is not embroiled in any significant military conflict (for the time being), something Trump may look to change.


Notable omissions from the refugee ban list include Saudi Arabia, a country that admitted aiding terrorists as a tool of foreign policy and that has exported its radical Wahhabism ideology (incidentally, the majority of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis); the United Arab Emirates (where the majority of the funding for 9/11 passed through); Turkey, which has been shown to aid ISIS fighters as they travel to and from Syria; Qatar, which has spent an immense amount of its vast wealth arming fanatical jihadists to fight in Syria; and Afghanistan, where al-Qaeda was born.


In essence, the countries kept off the list are the ones that arguably create the problem, yet the countries on the list are the ones that have to deal with the problem. Sound fair?


It’s one thing to want to keep your country safe from infiltrating terrorists; it’s another thing to stay silent about the atrocities your military is committing abroad and to ignore the numerous suspicious countries that have escaped such a ban. If your military can go somewhere to wreak havoc, that nation’s civilians should be allowed to come to you.


Additionally, keep in mind that Trump’s proposal may also be illegal.



This article (The U.S. Had a Plan to Topple All 7 Countries on Trump’s Refugee Ban List) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Darius Shahtahmasebi and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11 pm Eastern/8 pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, please email the error and name of the article to edits@theantimedia.org.

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Finally they Admit It! — FBI’s Own Study Proves the No. 1 Cause of Terrorism is Violent US Foreign Policy

To those of us who’ve been paying attention, it is no secret that the vicious cycle of US-led Western foreign policy has led to the creation and growth of terrorism worldwide. As the Free Thought Project has extensively noted over the years, the preemptive and oppressive tactics of the Pentagon have created a million Osama bin Ladens over the past decade alone. However, this problem has become so obvious, that even the US government has been forced to acknowledge it.


The Intercept recently reported it was given exclusive access to an internal FBI research study which surveyed FBI agents across the country, asking them their thoughts on homegrown terrorists. All of the agents surveyed were involved with over 200 open and closed cases of homegrown terrorism. Here’s a brief summary of the findings from the study titled, “Homegrown Violent Extremists: Survey Confirms Key Assessments, Reveals New Insights about Radicalization.”


  1. Anger over U.S. military operations overseas was the most often cited reason for individuals getting involved in cases of “homegrown” terrorism.

  2. Radicalization of homegrown terrorists follow no perceptible pattern.

  3. Radical terrorist believe the U.S. military commits atrocities in Muslim countries, and so homegrown terrorists justify their desires to retaliate.

  4. Online relationships with terrorists overseas (like Anwar Al-Awlaki) is a contributing factor driving extremism.

  5. Exposure to English-language militant propaganda is also cited as key factor driving extremism.

  6. Displeasure with U.S. military action was by far the most common factor in homegrown extremism found in 18 percent of the surveys taken.

  7. The U.S. being perceived to be at war against Islam and other factors associated with discrimination were also factors.

All of the aforementioned factors may be why, as the study notes, 10 of the 16 terrorist attacks (achieved or attempted), committed between 2009 and 2012, targeted military personnel or facilities.


According to The Intercept, “the report ends with recommendations that agents focus their attention on web forums, social media, and other online interactions, and step up surveillance of ‘known radicalizers’ and those who contact them.”


The Intercept cited Marc Sageman, a former CIA officer and author of “Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century”. Sageman says, politicians are partly to blame. “Politicians try very hard not to talk about foreign policy or military action being a major contributor to homegrown terrorism,” he said.



Sageman declares that radicalized homegrown terrorists identify with the victims of atrocities committed, they believe, by the U.S. Military. “Terrorism is very much a product of individuals identifying themselves with a group that appears to be the target of aggression and reacting violently to that,” he stated. “Continued U.S. military action will inevitably drive terrorist activities in this country, because some local people here will identify themselves with the victims of those actions abroad.”


If U.S. Military presence overseas, and perceived atrocities by the military is a driving factor in homegrown terrorism, then the most logical way, it appears, to keep Americans safer from domestic terrorism is to bring the troops home. But currently, there remains nearly 5,000 troops in Iraq, and President Obama promises to leave 8,400 troops in Afghanistan.


But even before he was Commander in Chief, in 2007, then Senator Barack H. Obama ran on a campaign promising to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and bring all U.S. troops home from the battlefield. He said, “I will promise you this…It is the first thing I will do. I will bring our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank.”


But even in the last three months of his presidency, after eight years of broken promises, he still has not fulfilled his commitment. And an enduring presence overseas, according to FBI agents here in the U.S., is a contributing factor to our own safety here at home. These wars need to stop now before they spill over into countries like Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Israel, creating an even bigger mess to clean up and leading to more instability in the homeland.