Confirmed: Numerous Agencies Held ‘Mass Casualty Incident’ Drills on Same Day as Amtrak Derailment

Training for the same scenario on the same day it happens —similar to 9/11, the London subway bombings and Paris theater mass terror attacks.

‘Lucky’ Larry Silverstein Set to Receive Another $95 Million in New 9/11 Settlement

"Lucky" Larry Silverstein is set to receive a $95.2 million settlement with American and United Airlines to settle claims resulting from the 9/11 attacks

9/11 remembrance: POTUS and FLOTUS observe moment of silence

WASHINGTON (INTELLIHUB) — President Donald Trump along with the First Lady Melania and others gathered at the White House Monday morning where they took a moment of silence in remembrance of the victims of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks which occurred 16-years ago.

After the ceremony, President Trump spoke about how “our whole world changed” when that first plane struck the tower.

“This was an attack on civilians,” the President said. “Innocent men, women, and children who’s lives were taken so needlessly.”

A total of “2,977 innocent souls […] were murdered by terrorists […] on that terrible, terrible day,” he said.

Featured Image: Screencapture via The White House/YouTube

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.

Larry Silverstein said he redesigned WTC 7 a year before 9/11

(INTELLIHUB) The CEO of Silverstein Properties, Larry Silverstein himself who was the owner of the World Trade Center when it was destroyed on Sept. 11, 2001, gave a speech in which he admitted to attendees that the new 7 World Trade Center was already designed and planned for in 2000, over a year before the September attacks involving ‘hijacked jet liners’ ever took place.

So why the new design?

At the beginning of the millennium, the infamous New York businessman had lease obligations to pay the Port Authority $120 million dollars a year for a term of 99-years.

Did Silverstein want out?

Silverstien admitted that his lease term seemed like “forever.” So if were were putting 2 and 2 together I would bet so. However, judging by his statement it’s guaranteed in my humble opinion.

“I had to rebuild, like kind, like quality, and I had an obligation to collect the insurance proceeds from the policies because that’s the only place that money could come from, was from the insurance proceeds,” he explained. “[…] when the antennae come down from the top of the North Tower it went right through the facade of 7 World Trade Center and started a fire and by the end of the afternoon the building just collapsed.”

The businessman recounts the attack

“Everybody was moving out of Lower Manhattan,” Silverstein said, appearing to have recounted the day of Sept. 11, 2001, after the planes struck. “Everybody wanted to get out of there. It was as if somebody said ‘if you’re the last one out please turn out the lights,’ it was terrible.”

7 World Trade, completed in 2006 (Sweeneyr)

“So I looked and I thought and I said to myself: ‘I’m going to have to do something here quickly’ because people were leaving, going uptown. And I said to myself, and then I said to Clara, and I said to everyone else: ‘We can’t leave this building this way. We can’t leave it with this big open expanse.”

“We have to show them a sign that this is not going to stay like this forever that that we are going to rebuild. […] we are going to get the money from the insurance companies to rebuild.,” he explained.

Silverstein’s comments lead some to believe that he ordered the demolition of WTC 7 on Sept. 11, 2001, after seeing a gaping hole in its side. Silverstein later admitted that he told firefighters to “pull it” which is commonly used demolition industry terminology meaning: to demolish the building.

The new and improved 7 World Trade Center (7 WTC) has a sprawling 1,700,000 of tenant space and was completed in 2006 after being fast-tracked by Silverstein so it could be rented to new and fearless tenants.

A reported 2,650 people were killed in the complex as the result of the attack.

“The first design meeting was in April of 2000 and construction began shortly after that in 2001,” he admitted.

Via Intellihub

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.

---

Shepard Ambellas is an opinion journalist, analyst, and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub News & Politics (Intellihub.com). Shepard is also known for producing Shade: The Motion Picture (2013) and appearing on Travel Channel’s America Declassified (2013). Shepard is a regular contributor to Infowars. Read more from Shep’s World. Follow Shep on Facebook and Twitter.

---

Three-dimensional computer analysis of 9/11 video footage yields astonishing results

The object that hit the North Tower "was masquerading as a passenger plane," researcher claims

(INTELLIHUB) — A three-dimensional computer model mimicking the alleged plane strike to the World Trade Center’s North Tower on Sept. 11, 2001, concludes, at the least, that something very suspicious is going on. In fact, the findings paint a clear picture of just how deep the now fully-discredited mainstream media’s lies and deceptions actually go and it may shock you.

For the analysis, researcher Richard D. Hall assembled a 3D computer model of the airspace near the WTC North Tower as it existed on Sept. 11, 2001, when attackers allegedly flew a Boeing 767 into the tower’s north face.

53 video clips in total were assembled by Hall for a 1-minute presentation to determine if the footage shown on the news that day matched up with the “official flight path” based on actual radar data taken from a radar impact speed study of the event.

“The model was constructed perfectly to scale [and] I also included a large aerial photograph of the land ensuring that the image was resized such that the scale on the ground was identical to the vertical scale of the buildings,” Hall explained. “I added a few more land marks, the Statue of Liberty and the Empire State Building.”

Through his research, Hall found that in all 53 images, “the alleged plane” does, in fact, follow the “official radar path” provided in the radar impact speed study. However, Hall’s analysis concludes that it was not a Boeing 767 that struck the North Tower as the media reported.

The video shows impossible impact dynamics, proving that what we are looking at is not a Boeing 767,” he stated.

Hall said that the aircraft’s wing structure is far to fragile, especially near the tips, to slice through reinforced steel columns on the tower’s exterior on impact, as depicted in videos provided publicly by the media.

“It’s made up of extremely thin aluminum ribs,” he said. “There is no way the wing is going to win.”

The planes were crated using “cartoon physics or butter planes,” Hall maintains. “In my opinion, we are not seeing a 767 with fragile aluminum plane impacting on solid steel columns.”

Through his research Hall concluded that a physical object did fly through the sky on 9/11 but the object was not a Boeing 767 as reports claim. Hall said that the wing-shaped cuts into the tower were formed seconds after the object’s impact.

Additionally, Hall’s analysis found that a Boeing 767 can not travel near sea-level at the speed of over 505 knots (578 mph) as a prominent 9/11 report claims. However, Hall independently confirmed that the object was traveling at a speed of “583 mph” in all of the 53 different video clips, again proving that a physical object, not a Boeing 767, did fly through the airspace and impact the tower.

If you remember, most images of the North Tower plane strike on 9/11 show a very dark looking plane with no windows. Moreover, eyewitnesses of the plane could be heard saying things like: “What the hell is that?” As the object was not perceived as a plane to the physical eye.

“What were we really looking at?” Hall questioned. “The true answer is: I don’t know but I will go as far as to say that it was not a 767 and whatever it was was masquerading as a passenger plane. In other words, the videos were real and the planes were at least to some degree fake.”

Via Intellihub

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.

---

Shepard Ambellas is an opinion journalist, analyst, and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub News & Politics (Intellihub.com). Shepard is also known for producing Shade: The Motion Picture (2013) and appearing on Travel Channel’s America Declassified (2013). Shepard is a regular contributor to Infowars. Read more from Shep’s World. Follow Shep on Facebook and Twitter.

---

One of the best 9/11 discussions ever with Eddie Bravo & architect Richard Gage

(INTELLIHUB) — Architect Richard Gage joins Eddie Bravo to talk about the September 11th, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and some of the technical details which led to three separate buildings falling at near freefall speeds that day.

The conversation goes far but fails to mention the use of nuclear and barometric bombs, as reported by Intellihub’s Shepard Ambellas.

Further Reading:

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.