Chevy Forced To Extend Shutdown Of Bolt Plant After Realizing That Literally No One Wants A Bolt

General Motors launched it"s much-hyped, all electric Chevy Bolt at the end of 2016.  The Bolt was expected to make a splash as it was the first electric car in the U.S. market to offer 200 miles of driving range at an affordable price starting around $35,000.  The only problem is that pretty much no one seems to want one.

Unfortunately, that lack of demand is about to earn a bunch of UAW workers at GM"s Orion, Michigan plant an extended summer vacation.

As AOL Finance points out today, GM has managed to sell just over 7,500 Chevy Bolts through the first six months of 2017.  Moreover, since dealers are sitting on about 111 days worth of inventory, we"re going to go out on a limb and say the Bolt launch slightly underperformed expectations.  All of which has resulted in GM"s decision to extend the shutdown currently in effect at it"s Orion plant for just a little while longer.

General Motors Co has extended a shutdown at the Michigan factory that builds the new Chevrolet Bolt electric car as part of a broader effort to get control of bulging inventories of unsold vehicles in the United States.

"Shutdown periods vary by plant based on launch timing of new or refreshed models across the portfolio and our ongoing efforts to align production with market demand," GM said in a statement.

But it"s not just the Chevy Bolt that GM is having a hard time selling.  Overall, the company is battling a massive inventory glut, some 126 days of supplies, in passenger cars.  As such, the company has extended summer vacation shutdowns at three other North American assembly plants. The assembly plant at Lordstown, Ohio, that makes the Chevrolet Cruze and a plant near Kansas City, Missouri, that produces the Malibu sedan both have three additional weeks of downtime. An assembly plant in Oshawa, Ontario, will be idled for two extra weeks to reduce inventories of the Chevrolet Impala large sedan.

Of course, this shouldn"t be much of a surprise for our readers as we recently pointed out that GM"s "channel stuffing" hit a new all time high for the restructured company in June 2017, with the number of GM vehicles parked at dealer lots and patiently waiting for a buyer rising to the highest since the summer before recession officially began, when GM was still pre-bankruptcy GM, with far greater (if ultimately superfluous and in need of restructuring) production.

All of which kind of makes you wonder just how well that other, highly-anticipated, mass-produced, affordable, all-electric vehicle will perform when/if it officially starts to ship later this year.

First Production Model 3 pic.twitter.com/TCa2NSUNI3

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 9, 2017

Chinese Corporate Financials Continue Disturbing Trend Of Deterioration

Authored by Bryce Coward via Knowledge Leaders Capital blog,

Highlighting the deteriorating trend in Chinese corporate financials has been an annual feature our of this blog. This year, instead of looking at just the CSI 300 constituents, we chose to broaden our universe by using the FTSE All A Share Index, an index of about 2000 Chinese A shares. This should give us the most accurate read on the state of corporate China.

For at least the last decade Chinese corporations have levered up, both through debt and working capital, in an attempt to keep the music playing and without regard to stability or profitability. As we will see, 2016 was no different. As an aside, all of the data in this post show aggregated (summed up) metrics for all non-financial companies. For example, sales growth numbers show the sum total of 2016 non-financial constituent sales relative to the sum total of 2015 non-financial constituent sales. Aggregating the data in this way gives us a good top down view without having to control for outlier companies that may be small and irrelevant.

Starting with the balance sheet, one constant characteristic of Chinese corporate behavior has been their willingness to lever up. There are a number of ways to measure leverage, but one of our favorites is net debt as a percent of equity. From 2005-2016 net debt as a percent of equity increased 126%. From 2015-2016 along it increased by 13% to 143%, the highest on record. Meanwhile debt as a percent of capital ticked up again to 63% in 2016 – also the highest reading on record – while cash as a percent of total capital fell to its lowest ever reading of 9%. Luckily, financial leverage (assets relative to equity) remained constant at an egregiously high 6.9x.

Moving on to some ratios of working capital metrics as a percent of sales, we can see that 2016 was just a continuation of an alarming decade-long trend of Chinese companies gutting corporate efficiency to finance sales. From 2005-2016 accounts receivable as a percent of sales has increased 173%, accounts payable as a percent of sales has increased 73% and inventory as a percent of sales has increased 86%. All three metrics increased to an all-time high in 2016.

Building up one’s working capital could be a strategy to manage exploding top line growth, but unfortunately that is not the case for Chinese companies. Sales and net income haven’t grown since 2014 and net income actually contracted in 2016. Cash flow from operations also fell 18% for the largest year-on-year contraction since at least 2006. Plunging cash flow is an indication that the earnings decline of 1% could be painting too rosy a picture.

This brings us to something we like to call Chinese channel stuffing – or the tendency of corporate China to stuff the supply chain with accounts receivable and accounts payable so as to keep sales/sales growth at the desired level. Since 2012 both current liabilities and current assets have outpaced sales growth by between 2%-10% annually. In 2016 both metrics outpaced sales growth by 6%. This is to say, in order for corporate China in aggregate to have generated flat sales in 2016, they needed to grow working capital by 6%. In order for corporate China to have generated flat sales for two consecutive years they needed to grow working capital by a cumulative 16%.

The good thing is that, if you can believe the earnings and cash flow numbers, margins have remained relatively healthy. Net profit margins have remained at the historical average of 8% while cash flow margins stood at a robust 27% in 2017.

But, flat margins and growing balance sheets make for deteriorating profitability stats. In 2016 ROE dropped to an all-time low of 9%, ROA dropped to 5% and ROIC dropped to an all-time low of 4%.

There unfortunately are not a lot of positive things to say about the trends in corporate China. Much of the above is of course driven by SOEs at the behest of the government, but that doesn’t make the trends look any better. No one knows what the tipping point is and how long this can continue, but it goes without saying that we’d like to see these firms align the growth of their balance sheets to the growth of their income statements as soon as possible.

Carmageddon: Record Incentives And Financing Terms Fail To Stem The Auto Bleeding In June

Yesterday we noted that auto investors celebrated the fact that, while auto sales were down massively year-over-year (to the tune of nearly 6% for the Detroit 3), June figures were "less bad" than expected, so "good".  All of which sparked even more "irrational exuberance" among OEM equity owners and sent Ford/GM shares soaring. 

But, rather than focus on the headline numbers, perhaps those equity owners should spend a little more time analyzing the record incentives and deteriorating underwriting standards that have been required to generate those "less bad" results.

Take, for example, incentive spending for the month of June.  As Automotive News points out, overall industry incentive spending soared nearly 10% YoY with brands like Hyundai and Honda slashing 42% and 20%, respectively, to move their bloated dealer inventories.

ALG reports automakers spent an average of $3,550 per new vehicle sold in June, up 9.7 percent from a year ago. The average discount is expected to account for 10.8 percent of the average transaction price of vehicles sold last month -- marking the 11th time in the past year that incentive spending has accounted for 10 percent or more of the sale price, according to industry forecasters.

Autodata Corp. says average incentive spending heading into June was up 15 percent to $3,516 per vehicle sold. Despite weakening demand for cars, incentive spending for light-duty truck increased 16 percent compared to 13 percent for light-duty passenger cars during the first five months of the year.

American automakers, which continue to offer the most cash on the hood, matched the industry average for incentive spending, up 14 percent through May, while average discounts at Asian brands increased 19 percent and deals at European automakers rose only 3.9 percent.

ALG reported Subaru, Hyundai and Kia experienced the largest increases in incentive spending in June compared with a year ago. Average discounts at Subaru -- the lowest spender in the industry -- increased 63 percent to $1,032; followed by Hyundai, rising 42 percent to $3,259; and Kia, with an increase of 25 percent to $3,384.

Meanwhile, Edmunds notes that auto loan terms continue to get stretched out to record new highs each month all in an effort to continually lower monthly payments so that entitled Americans can buy cars they really can"t afford.

Edmunds analysts found that the average loan term for new vehicles soared to a record high of 69.3 months in June, an increase of 1 percent from June 2016 and up 6.8 percent from five years ago. In addition, the average amount financed by new-car buyers jumped to $30,945, which is a 2.6 percent increase from this time last year and 17.2 percent more than five years ago. And the average monthly car payment is now $517: That"s 2.1 percent more than in June 2016 and an 11.3 percent increase over five years.

"Stretching out loan terms to secure a monthly payment they"re comfortable with is becoming buyers" go-to way to get the cars they want, equipped the way they want them," said Jessica Caldwell, executive director of industry analysis for Edmunds. "It"s financially risky, leaving borrowers exposed to being upside down on their vehicles for a large chunk of their loans, but it"s also a sign that consumers are still confident enough in the economy to spend more on their vehicles and commit to paying for them longer."

And it"s not just new car loans as used car terms are getting stretched out as well...a fact that we"re sure will serve consumers well if Morgan Stanley"s downside case for used car prices ever actually plays out (see "Morgan Stanley: Used Car Prices May Crash 50%").

Consumers in the market for a used vehicle are also willing to stretch their payments. An Edmunds analysis found that the average loan length for a used car is now 66.9 months, up 0.1 percent from June 2016 and up 6 percent than five years ago. The average amount financed has risen to $21,142, a 0.4 percent jump from last year and an increase of 9.9 percent over five years. And the average used-car payment in June was $383, which is 0.8 percent more than a year ago and up 3.5 percent from five years ago.

And don"t even get us started on the record level of "channel stuffing" going on the industry...

...with GM being the biggest culprit with inventory days up a modest 46% YoY to an all new record high of 105 days.

???? GM"s inventory has officially hit a 10-year high. 980,454 units in stock (a 105-day supply) as of June 30, the most since June 2007.

— Nick Bunkley (@nickbunkley) July 3, 2017

Finally, as Stone McCarthy Research points out, Americans, flush with their $0 down, 0% interest for 84 month auto loans, continued to shun cars for much more expensive, and profitable, trucks and SUV"s.  Another "positive" for the industry...if you manage to ignore those record incentives we mentioned above which are eroding away all that extra profit.

General Motors domestic car sales came in much lower than we expected, and declined nearly 34% from June 2016. Their domestic light truck sales were much stronger than we expected, and were up over 7% from last year.

Domestic car sales were weaker than expected for Ford as well, and fell 23% from last year. Ford domestic light truck sales also came in below our expectations, though were not weak as ford domestic car sales, and were only up about 6% from June 2016.

Chrysler domestic light car sales came in right where we expected, down 19% from last year. Domestic light truck sales for Chrysler were below our expectations though, and fell around 3% from last year.

Car sales:

Truck sales:

Of course, things like math and critical thought are way more complicated than quickly reacting to "less bad" headlines.  That said, in the long run, math and logic tend to prevail.

 

GM Reports Record "Channel Stuffing": Dealer Auto Inventory Highest Since June 2007

As we await all US carmakers to report June auto sales, we remind readers that when we discussed last month"s disappointing monthly car sales report, which badly missed expectations showing the fifth consecutive month of declining auto sales - the first time this has happened since July 2009 -  with domestic light vehicle auto sales printing at an annualized 12.59, the lowest sales number going back more than three years - we noted what may be the biggest concern for the auto industry: inventory days continued to trend higher as OEMs push product on to dealer lots even though sale-through to end customers has seemingly stalled.

Of note, we highlighted GM, one of the few OEMs to actually disclose dealer inventories in monthly sales releases, which reported that May inventories increased to 101 days (963,448 vehicles) from 100 days at the end of April and just 71 days (681,402 vehicles) in April 2016. Indicatively, analysts say an overall inventory level of 60 to 70 days is healthy. 100 is not. GM management was eager to deflect attention from this troubling statistic, and said that soaring inventories are normal and, somehow, "reflect strong sales", as per the press release: "As planned, GM’s inventories reflect strong sales, lower car production and strategic, launch-related growth in truck and crossover stocks."

Or maybe not, because as Automotive News reporter Nick Bunkley pointed out something troubling: with 935,758 unsold GM units collecting dust in dealer lots at the end of June, this was the highest inventory number in 9.5 years,  the highest since November 2007, one month before the recession began.

Fast forward to today when GM reported its June results which again disappointed, and were down 4.7%, more than the expected 3.4% decline (although one wouldn"t know it by looking at the stock which was up as much as 3%). GM sales were dragged by most brands: Chevy -6.4%, GMC -3.6%, Buick +16.4%, Cadillac -11.8%. But that"s not what caught our attention: a bigger problem is what GM revealed in its deliveries report which disclosed a whopping 980,454 units in dealer inventory at the end of June, up nearly 17k from the past month, and representing 105 days of supply, up from an already red-flag raising 101 in May. As Buntkley notes, "GM"s inventory has officially hit a 10-year high. 980,454 units in stock (a 105-day supply) as of June 30, the most since June 2007."

???? GM"s inventory has officially hit a 10-year high. 980,454 units in stock (a 105-day supply) as of June 30, the most since June 2007.

— Nick Bunkley (@nickbunkley) July 3, 2017

In short: GM "channel stuffing" just hit a new all time high for the restructured company, with the number of GM vehicles parked at dealer lots and patiently waiting for a buyer rising to the highest since the summer before recession officially began, when GM was still pre-bankruptcy GM, with far greater (if ultimately superfluous and in need of restructuring) production.

Carmageddon: After Abysmal April Sales, Auto Workers Prepare For "Extended" Summer Shutdowns

Auto OEMs typically shut down plants once a year during the summer to retool for model changeovers and whatever general maintenance is required.  But this year summer shutdowns will be about much more than just retooling plants.  With inventory soaring on dealer lots, auto OEMs will likely have no choice but to extend their typically summer shut down schedule and it will take a "yuge" toll on the 1,000s of auto workers that are considered "short term" employees and not eligible for unemployment benefits...the folks who pretty much single-handedly voted Trump into the White House.

As we noted yesterday (see "Auto Bloodbath: Every OEM Misses April Sales Estimates As Inventories Continue To Soar"), after an abysmal March print and growing speculation on wall street that auto sales are looking less like a "plateau" (Ford"s label not ours) and more like a debt-fueled bubble on the verge of an epic collapse, auto investors were looking toward April auto sales for signs of hope.  Unfortunately, the "hope" trade failed to materialize as every single, major auto OEM missed their April sales estimates in fairly spectacular fashion. 

The total auto SAAR came in at 16.8mm for April, compared to hopes of 17.1mm, and the YoY change in unit sales was the worst since 2011.

Meanwhile, inventory days continued to soar to multi-year highs with GM leading the pack on "channel stuffing" with over 935,000 unsold cars sitting on dealer lots.

All of which has automotive analysts now predicting that the "typical" summer shutdown cycle in 2017 will be anything but typical and could include 3-4 shutdowns for plants producing some of the worst performing models.  Per Bloomberg:

“We’re not seeing the same picture as the president,” said Michelle
Krebs, a senior analyst with Cox Automotive. “We are not seeing any new plants being built in the United States or increases in production. The fact is we have passed the sales peak and we’re now seeing decreases in production.”

Even if that happens, weeks of production suspension seem almost certain to be on tap for the industry, said Mark Wakefield, managing director and head of the automotive practice at AlixPartners. He said automakers have aggressive plans for temporarily shuttering assemblies that make slow-selling sedans and small models.

“For certain plants, we’ll see three or four summer shutdowns for the tougher-selling products,” Wakefield said. Right now, automakers “are a little less worried about inventories because they know they’ll be taking the plants down more.”

“People are starting to see that this is not necessarily a plateau,” Wakefield said. “It’s a meaningful reduction, and they’re starting to make plans around that.”

Of course, as J.D. Power recently pointed out, growing inventories on dealer lots come despite OEM"s spending $16.4 billion on incentives through April, or roughly $3,800 per car, up 13% vs. last year.

“While industry retail sales pace remains high, it is being powered by elevated levels of incentive spending which pose a serious threat to the long-term health of the industry. The total value of incentives used to sell new vehicles has increased by $1.9 billion through the first four months of the year.”

Total incentive spending in the marketplace stands at $16.4 billion through April, up 13% from last year. On a per unit basis, spending for the average new vehicle through April was $3,814, up $460 from a year ago.  On trucks and SUVs, spending was $3,740, up $578, while on cars, spending was $3,938, up $308.

Despite record incentive levels, average days to turn continues to rise. Nearly 30% of vehicles sold in 2017 sat on dealer lots for over 90 days, up from 27% last year. “With flat retail demand and inventory at record levels, manufacturers will continue to face a difficult choice between maintaining elevated incentives or making production cuts,” Borrego said.

On the bright side, for Trump anyway, at least the auto jobs aren"t going to Mexico.