Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

5 of the Most Violent Cities in the WORLD Are Right Here in America

5 of the Most Violent Cities in the WORLD Are Right Here in America | violence | Sleuth Journal Society US News


When you think of the most dangerous, violent cities in the world, do you picture slums in Third World countries with vicious drug cartels or arrogant warlords? Maybe the kind of violence where enemies are decapitated and whole families are murdered seem like things that happen far away in some terrifying, exotic locale.


Some of this is true – but FIVE of the world’s most violent cities are right here on the American mainland and another is in an American territory. The list was created by researchers of anti-violence think-tank Seguridad, Justicia Y Paz (Security, Justice, and Peace), who made their rankings based on statistics of homicides per 100,000 residents.


The vast majority of the cities on the list were in Central and South America. Interestingly, the violence in Venezuela appears to have dropped in violence this year, but not because it’s suddenly become a mecca of safety. The official situation there has devolved so much that they simply can’t track all the homicides.


But back to America


We pride ourselves on our first world status and civilized societies, and yet four of our cities ended up on the list of the most dangerous and violent locales on the planet.


They are:



  • #13 St. Louis

  • #21 Baltimore

  • #32 San Juan

  • #41 New Orleans

  • #42 Detroit


How did these cities make the list?



  • St. Louis, Missouri: Since the Ferguson riots, the entire state of Missouri has seen a sharp increase in violence. This has culminated in the city of St. Louis, which had a 2017 murder rate of 65.83 per hundred thousand people. There are thousands of violent crimes each year in the city, which only has a population of about 320,000 people.

  • Baltimore, Maryland: The city of Baltimore has an astounding murder rate of 55.48 people per hundred thousand. Last year’s murder rate was nearly as high as the year that the riots erupted over the killing of Freddie Gray by city police officers.  There’s a murder nearly every day of the year in Baltimore and the police force there is widely considered to be one of the most corrupt – if not the most corrupt – in the nation.

  • San Juan, Puerto Rico:  Many will think that San Juan earned its place on the list due to the devastation wrought by two back to back hurricanes, but it was already bad for years before. DHS ties this to drug trafficking. The island territory had begun to see signs of improvement in 2015 after a massive spike in 2011 that brought murders to an all-time high. The homicide numbers didn’t immediately escalate after Hurricane Maria, but as the unrelenting darkness continued, violent crime began to increase until it reached 48.70 murders per hundred thousand residents.

  • New Orleans, Louisiana: Murders in New Orleans, Louisiana fell last year but armed robberies and non-fatal shootings have risen by a whopping 30% since 2010. The city is renowned for its food, music, and festivals, making it a popular destination for tourists. Yet, the 40.10 murders per hundred thousand people rank The Big Easy as more dangerous than some of the most notorious cities in Brazil and Columbia.

  • Detroit, Michigan: Detroit is the fourth American city to be featured on the list of places you’re most likely to be murdered. With a homicide rate of 39.69 per one hundred thousand people, Detroit was the 42 most dangerous city in the world according to these statistics. The city used to be an American hub of industry, but when the automotive manufacturers left, it fell into disrepair and poverty. Residents have a whopping unemployment rate of almost 11%, the population has plummeted, and since it is one of the poorest cities in the nation, perhaps the residents who remain simply can’t afford to get out.


For those who are interested in preparedness, the collapse of these cities is something to watch. Note how the increase of violence in many cases ties in with a lack of confidence in local law enforcement officers. A failing economy is another factor, as increased desperation leads to increased crime.


What other cities made the list?


Here’s the list of the 50 most violent cities in the world in its entirety:



  1. Los Cabos, Mexico

  2. Caracas, Venezuela

  3. Acapulco, Mexico

  4. Natal, Brasil

  5. Tijuana, Mexico

  6. La Paz, Mexico

  7. Fortaleza, Brazil

  8. Victoria, Mexico

  9. Guayana, Mexico

  10. Belem, Brazil

  11. Vitória da Conquista, Brazil

  12. Culicacan, Mexico

  13. St. Louis, Missouri, USA

  14. Maceio, Brazil

  15. Cape Town, South Africa

  16. Kingston, Jamaica

  17. San Salvador, El Salvador

  18. Aracaju, Brazil

  19. Feira de Santana, Brazil

  20. Juarez, Mexico

  21. Baltimore, Maryland, USA

  22. Recife, Brazil

  23. Maturin, Venezuela

  24. Guatemala City, Guatemala

  25. Salvador, Brazil

  26. San Pedro Sula, Honduras

  27. Valencia, Venezuela

  28. Cali, Colombia

  29. Chihuahua, Mexico

  30.  João Pessoa, Brazil

  31. Obregon, Mexico

  32. San Juan, Puerto Rico

  33. Barquisimeto, Venezuela

  34. Manaus, Brazil

  35. Distrito Central, Honduras

  36. Tepic, Mexico

  37. Palmira, Colombia

  38. Reynosa, Mexico

  39. Porto Alegre. Brazil

  40. Macapa, Brazil

  41. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

  42. Detroit, Michican, USA

  43. Mazatlán, Mexico

  44. Durban, South Africa

  45. Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil

  46. Nelson Mandela Bay, South Africa

  47. Campina Grande, Brazil

  48. Teresina, Brazil

  49. Vitoria, Brazil

  50. Cúcuta, Colombia


Seguridad, Justicia Y Paz blames much of the violence on drug cartel turf wars, economic crises, and violence perpetrated by gangs like MS-13.


Do you have any doubt that violence will be abundant when the SHTF?


All you need to do is look at this list and study these cities to see how violence escalates when the rule of law collapses, when economies crash and people starve, when police officers go dirty, and when criminal gangs turn into the ruling class.


This is just further evidence to support my belief that preppers must be armed. If you are prepping to survive a long-term event, make sure that you plan to survive the escalation of violence, too.


The post 5 of the Most Violent Cities in the WORLD Are Right Here in America appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Monday, March 12, 2018

5 of the Most Violent Cities in the WORLD Are Right Here in America

This report was originally published by Daisy Luther at The Organic Prepper



When you think of the most dangerous, violent cities in the world, do you picture slums in Third World countries with vicious drug cartels or arrogant warlords? Maybe the kind of violence where enemies are decapitated and whole families are murdered seem like things that happen far away in some terrifying, exotic locale.


Some of this is true – but FIVE of the world’s most violent cities are right here on the American mainland and another is in an American territory. The list was created by researchers of anti-violence think-tank Seguridad, Justicia Y Paz (Security, Justice, and Peace), who made their rankings based on statistics of homicides per 100,000 residents.


The vast majority of the cities on the list were in Central and South America. Interestingly, the violence in Venezuela appears to have dropped in violence this year, but not because it’s suddenly become a mecca of safety. The official situation there has devolved so much that they simply can’t track all the homicides.


But back to America


We pride ourselves on our first world status and civilized societies, and yet four of our cities ended up on the list of the most dangerous and violent locales on the planet.


They are:



  • #13 St. Louis

  • #21 Baltimore

  • #32 San Juan

  • #41 New Orleans

  • #42 Detroit


How did these cities make the list?



  • St. Louis, Missouri: Since the Ferguson riots, the entire state of Missouri has seen a sharp increase in violence. This has culminated in the city of St. Louis, which had a 2017 murder rate of 65.83 per hundred thousand people. There are thousands of violent crimes each year in the city, which only has a population of about 320,000 people.

  • Baltimore, Maryland: The city of Baltimore has an astounding murder rate of 55.48 people per hundred thousand. Last year’s murder rate was nearly as high as the year that the riots erupted over the killing of Freddie Gray by city police officers.  There’s a murder nearly every day of the year in Baltimore and the police force there is widely considered to be one of the most corrupt – if not the most corrupt – in the nation.

  • San Juan, Puerto Rico:  Many will think that San Juan earned its place on the list due to the devastation wrought by two back to back hurricanes, but it was already bad for years before. DHS ties this to drug trafficking. The island territory had begun to see signs of improvement in 2015 after a massive spike in 2011 that brought murders to an all-time high. The homicide numbers didn’t immediately escalate after Hurricane Maria, but as the unrelenting darkness continued, violent crime began to increase until it reached 48.70 murders per hundred thousand residents.

  • New Orleans, Louisiana: Murders in New Orleans, Louisiana fell last year but armed robberies and non-fatal shootings have risen by a whopping 30% since 2010. The city is renowned for its food, music, and festivals, making it a popular destination for tourists. Yet, the 40.10 murders per hundred thousand people rank The Big Easy as more dangerous than some of the most notorious cities in Brazil and Columbia.

  • Detroit, Michigan: Detroit is the fourth American city to be featured on the list of places you’re most likely to be murdered. With a homicide rate of 39.69 per one hundred thousand people, Detroit was the 42 most dangerous city in the world according to these statistics. The city used to be an American hub of industry, but when the automotive manufacturers left, it fell into disrepair and poverty. Residents have a whopping unemployment rate of almost 11%, the population has plummeted, and since it is one of the poorest cities in the nation, perhaps the residents who remain simply can’t afford to get out.


For those who are interested in preparedness, the collapse of these cities is something to watch. Note how the increase of violence in many cases ties in with a lack of confidence in local law enforcement officers. A failing economy is another factor, as increased desperation leads to increased crime.


What other cities made the list?


Here’s the list of the 50 most violent cities in the world in its entirety:



  1. Los Cabos, Mexico

  2. Caracas, Venezuela

  3. Acapulco, Mexico

  4. Natal, Brasil

  5. Tijuana, Mexico

  6. La Paz, Mexico

  7. Fortaleza, Brazil

  8. Victoria, Mexico

  9. Guayana, Mexico

  10. Belem, Brazil

  11. Vitória da Conquista, Brazil

  12. Culicacan, Mexico

  13. St. Louis, Missouri, USA

  14. Maceio, Brazil

  15. Cape Town, South Africa

  16. Kingston, Jamaica

  17. San Salvador, El Salvador

  18. Aracaju, Brazil

  19. Feira de Santana, Brazil

  20. Juarez, Mexico

  21. Baltimore, Maryland, USA

  22. Recife, Brazil

  23. Maturin, Venezuela

  24. Guatemala City, Guatemala

  25. Salvador, Brazil

  26. San Pedro Sula, Honduras

  27. Valencia, Venezuela

  28. Cali, Columbia

  29. Chihuahua, Mexico

  30.  João Pessoa, Brazil

  31. Obregon, Mexico

  32. San Juan, Puerto Rico

  33. Barquisimeto, Venezuela

  34. Manaus, Brazil

  35. Distrito Central, Honduras

  36. Tepic, Mexico

  37. Palmira, Columbia

  38. Reynosa, Mexico

  39. Porto Alegre. Brazil

  40. Macapa, Brazil

  41. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

  42. Detroit, Michican, USA

  43. Mazatlán, Mexico

  44. Durban, South Africa

  45. Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil

  46. Nelson Mandela Bay, South Africa

  47. Campina Grande, Brazil

  48. Teresina, Brazil

  49. Vitoria, Brazil

  50. Cúcuta, Colombia


Seguridad, Justicia Y Paz blames much of the violence on drug cartel turf wars, economic crises, and violence perpetrated by gangs like MS-13.


Do you have any doubt that violence will be abundant when the SHTF?


All you need to do is look at this list and study these cities to see how violence escalates when the rule of law collapses, when economies crash and people starve, when police officers go dirty, and when criminal gangs turn into the ruling class.


This is just further evidence to support my belief that preppers must be armed. If you are prepping to survive a long-term event, make sure that you plan to survive the escalation of violence, too.

Friday, March 2, 2018

Contrary to What The TV is Telling You, There Are Fewer School Shooting Now Vs. the 1990s

school

Contrary to what the mainstream media is trying to portray, American schools are far less violent now than they were two, three, or even four decades ago and the trend is getting better.


The post Contrary to What The TV is Telling You, There Are Fewer School Shooting Now Vs. the 1990s appeared first on The Free Thought Project.

Friday, February 16, 2018

Far-Left Group Calls For Murdering Republicans as Revenge For Florida School Shooting

This article was originally published by Paul Joseph Watson at Infowars



A far-left group on Facebook is calling on people to murder Republican lawmakers who support the NRA as revenge for the Florida school shooting.


The unhinged posts appeared on a Facebook group called ‘Milkshakes Against the Republican Party’ in the hours after the massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.


“Dear Crazed Shooters, The GOP has frequent baseball practice. You really wanna be remembered, that’s how you do it. Signed, Americans tired of our politicians bathing in the blood of the innocent for a few million dollars from the terrorist organization NRA,” states one of the posts.



The irony of openly encouraging terrorist attacks as revenge against a “terrorist organization” is seemingly lost on whoever posted the message.


“You remember the shooting at the Republican baseball game?” asks another post. “One of those should happen EVERY WEEK until those NRA-funded sons of bitches do something about this.”



Neither of the posts has been removed by Facebook despite being online for approaching 48 hours.


The mention of GOP baseball practice is in reference to the June 2017 shooting of Congressman Steve Scalise, which was carried out by a far-left Bernie Sanders supporter, James T. Hodgkinson, who was attempting to murder as many Republicans as possible.


These posts again illustrate how extremists on both the far left and far right are exploiting the hyper-partisan environment to spread hate and encourage violence.


Leftists on Twitter responded to a parent of one of the victims who lost his daughter in the school shooting with total vitriol merely because the man was wearing a ‘Trump 2020’ t-shirt.




SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:



Follow on Twitter:






Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71






*********************






Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

Friday, February 9, 2018

SELCO: The Brutal Truth About Violence When the SHTF

This article was originally published by Daisy Luther at The Organic Prepper


betrayal-3


Selco interviewed by Daisy Luther


Are you prepared for the extreme violence that is likely to come your way if the SHTF? No matter what your plan is, it’s entirely probable that at some point, you’ll be the victim of violence or have to perpetrate violence to survive. As always, Selco is our go-to guy on SHTF reality checks and this thought-provoking interview will shake you to your core.


If you don’t know Selco, he’s from Bosnia and he lived through a year in a city that was blockaded with no utilities, no deliveries of supplies, and no services. In his interviews, he shares what the scenarios the rest of us theorize about were REALLY like. He mentioned to me recently that most folks aren’t prepared for the violence that is part and parcel of a collapse, which brings us to today’s interview.


How prevalent was violence when the SHTF in Bosnia?


It was wartime and chaos, from all conflicts in those years in the Balkan region Bosnian conflict was most brutal because of multiple reasons, historical, political and other.


To simplify the explanation why violence was common and very brutal, you need to picture a situation where you are “bombarded” with huge amount of information (propaganda) which instills in you very strong feelings of fear and hate.


Out of fear and hate, violence grows easy and fast, and over the very short period of time you see how people around you (including you) do things that you could not imagine before.


I can say that violence was almost an everyday thing in the whole spectrum of different activities because it was a fight for survival.


Again, whenever (and wherever) you put people in a region without enough resources, you can expect violence.


We were living a normal life, and then suddenly we were thrown in a way of living where if you could not “negotiate” something with someone, you solve the problem by launching a rocket from an RPG through the window of his living room.


Hate stripped down the layers of humanity and suddenly it was “normal” to level an apartment building with people inside with shells from a tank or form private prisons with imprisoned civilians for slave work or sex slaves.


Nothing that I saw or read before could have prepared me for the level of violence and blindness to it, for the lives of kids, elders, civilians, and the innocent.


Again, the thing that is important for readers is that we were a modern society one day, and then in few weeks it turned into carnage.


Do not make the mistake of saying “it cannot happen here” because I made that mistake too.


Do not underestimate power of propaganda, fear, hate, and the lowest human instincts, no matter how modern and good your society is right now and how deeply you believe that “it can not happen here”.


You’ve mentioned warlords and gangs in several of your articles. Were they responsible for the majority of the violence or was it hungry families?


Fighting of the armies through the whole period of war brings violence in terms of constant shelling from a distance from different kind of weapons.


For example a few multiple rocket launchers (VBR) could bring in 30 seconds the destruction in an area of 3-4 apartment buildings, and being there in that moment and surviving it gives you a completely new view on life.


Snipers were a constant threat and over time you simply grow a way of living that you constant scan area in front of you where your next steps gonna be. Are you gonna be visible and from where? Etc.


Most brutal violence was actually lawlessness and complete lack of order between different factions and militias, so in some periods there were militias or gangs who simply ruled the cities or part of the city where they were absolutely masters of everything in terms of deciding of taking someone’s life.


In lawlessness, you as one person could be really small and not interesting, or join some bigger group of people to be stronger, some family or militia or gang.


An example of a gang would be group of people of some 300 or 500 people who “officially” were a unit or militia and operate for some faction, but in reality they operate mostly for themselves.


That included owning part of the black market, having prison (for forced labor or ransom), attacking people and houses for resources, smuggling people from dangerous areas.


Violence from those kinds of group was the most immediate violence, the most visible in terms of SHTF talking.


If those people came on your door you could obey, fight, or negotiate, but mostly you could not not ask for help from any kind of authority, because there was no real authority.


In any society, no matter where you are living, there are a great number of people who are waiting for the SHTF to go out and do violent things. Small time criminals or simply violent persons who are not openly violent because system is there to punish them for that. It is like that.


Some gang leaders that I knew were actually completely sick people with a strange type of charisma that makes people follow them, weird situations that can happen only in a real collapse.


They are people who just waited for their time to rise.


Those kinds of people together with criminal organization that are already there in any city in the world will be the backbone of SHTF gangs.


Who were the most likely victims?


A very simple answer would be that the most likely victims were people who had interesting things without enough defense.


But it was not always that simple.


For example one of the first houses that got raided in my neighborhood, right at the beginning of collapse while there was still some kind of order, was a rich family’s home.


They had a nice house with bars on the windows, a pretty good setup for defense, and they had enough people inside so they could give pretty good resistance to the mob.


But they got raided simply because they were known that they are rich, so they were attacked with enough force to be overwhelmed.


It was not only about how much manpower you had and how well-organized defense of your home was, it was also about how juicy a target you were.


If you are faced with 150 angry people attacking your home because they are sure you have good stuff inside your chances are low, no matter how good and tough you are.


People who were alone were a pretty easy target and old people without support of family or friends.


It was not always about killing someone or violence. For example, if you were alone and without resources but you had something else valuable like some kind of skill or knowledge you could easily be “recruited” for some faction or group, not by your will of course.


What were some ways to prevent yourself from becoming a victim of violence? How do you recommend that people prepare themselves for the possibility of violence?


It can be done in steps, or in layers.


Do not be interesting (or attract attention) when the SHTF.


This means a lot of things, for this article I can give a few examples with shortened explanations because it is a huge topic:



  • Do not look like a prepper (before or after SHTF). There is no sense in announcing that you are prepping for EMP, civil collapse, apocalypse, or whatever. With that you are risking the probability that when the SHTF, people will remember that you have interesting things in your home

  • Your home should look ordinary. For example, if you are living in the city on a street where all houses look similar, there is not  much sense in making your home look like a fortress. You’ll just attract attention.

  • Your defense should be based on more subtle means. Some examples are having means to reinforce doors and windows quickly when you need it, or to reinforce them from inside. Make changes in your yard to funnel possible attackers where you want them to be (trees, fence, bush…). You can make your home look abandoned or already looted.


Think about what survival is!


Survival is about staying alive, it is not about being comfortable at the expense of losing your life.


I have seen many times people lose their lives simply because they were too attached to their belongings (house, car, land, goods…) so they simply did not want to leave something and run in a particular moment.


Everything can be earned and bought again except life.


Forget about statements like “I will defend it with my life” or “over my dead body” or similar because the real SHTF is usually not heroic or noble. It is hard and brutal. When you are gone you are gone and there might be nobody to take care of your family just because you have been stubborn or trusted in movies when it came to violence.


To rephrase it: Be ready to leave your home in a split second if that means you and your family will survive, no matter how many good things you have stored there.


Be mentally ready for violence


In a way, it is impossible to be ready for violence, especially widespread violence when the SHTF, but you can minimize shock when that happens with some things.


If you are not familiar with what violence is, you can try to get yourself close” to it today (in normal times). It can be done, for example, by doing some voluntary work for example in a local hospital, ER or similar… or simply by working with homeless people.


Sounds maybe strange but activities like this can get you a bit of a feeling of what it is all about, not to mention that you can learn some practical and useful skills for SHTF.


Have means and skills  (physically) to defend – or to do violence


No matter how old or young you are, your gender or religion I assure you that you are capable of doing violence. It is only a matter of the situation and how far you are going to be pushed.


It is not just “some people are capable of violence.” Everybody is capable. Not everybody enjoys doing it or is willing to do it so easily.


In today (normal times) you can learn some violence skills and you should do it, again no matter if you are a woman or old or young.


You should own a weapon and know how to use it. You should practice with it, or have at least some basic knowledge about hand-to-hand combat.


The worst case scenario is to have a weapon that you try for the first time when SHTF.


Be familiar with your means for defense, let your family members know what they need to do in case of attack of your home, have plan, and go through it.


Only through practice will you minimize chances for mistakes.


Use common sense


I know lot of survivalists almost dream about how they are going to use weapons against bad guys when SHTF, and that they will be something like super heroes from movies, saving innocents and killing villains.


Truth is that in a real collapse, a lot of things are kind of blurred and you are not sure who the bad guys are. Good guys turn out to be lunatic gang members who want to bring food to their kids.


There are no super heroes when SHTF, and if some of them show up they end up dead quickly.


There is only you and your skills and mindset and what you prepared.


Use  violence as a last resort because of the simple fact that by using violence you are risking of getting killed or hurt. Remember when SHTF there is maybe no doctor or hospital to take care of your wound.


It is a time when even a small cut can eventually kill you through infection and lack of proper care.


I’m a single mom with a household full of girls. In an SHTF situation, what would our best strategies be to remain safe?


Just like I have mentioned before, strategy is always same for any part of survival, and shooting from the rifle is pretty similar no matter are you man or woman.


Being single mom with household full of girls on first look make you as a ideal target in some situations, but we are talking here in prepper terms so there is no reason not to be perfectly well prepared as a single mom with girls.


But yes I admit it is not perfect situation, even if you are prepared well, some things are sure, you need to connect with other people even more.


House with couple of girls will always look like easy prey for some people.


It is like that.


Were people in the city safer than people in the country? Can you tell us more about rural living during this time?


In my case definitely no.


In the essence it always come to the resources and people.


City meant more people less resources, country (rural) meant less people more resources, and because that level of violence simply was lower. That was most important reason.


There are few more reasons why it was much better in the country.


People in the country (rural settings) were much more “connected to ground”  they were more tough if you like, they grew their own food, had cattle, lived more simple life prior SHTF and when everything collapsed they had less problems getting use to it.


Yes they also did not have electricity and phones, running water or connection to other places but they adapted easier to the new life because they had more useful skills then people in the city.


Life was harder for them too than prior to the collapse, but they had means to get resources: land, woods, river…


Another thing is that people in small rural communities “in the country” were more connected to each other, people knew their neighborhood and some things were easier to organize, like community security watch, help in case of diseases and similar.


What types of weapons did people have for self-defense?


It was different political system prior the collapse where it was not so usual to own a weapon legally. And to own one illegally could mean a lot of troubles.


Right prior to SHTF, it became possible to buy different weapons on the black market but still, a majority of people did not own weapons.


When it all collapsed, it was possible to get a weapon through trade.


Because of the military doctrine here prior to the collapse, we used “East Bloc” weapons. A favorite was AK-47 in all different kind of editions, or older weapons like M-48 rifle, SKS rifle, 22 and similar.


People used what they had, so in one period you would be lucky if you had any kind of pistol and knife.


Later through the different channels weapon become more available so people had them more. A lot of that was actually junk that some warlords somehow “imported”.


Weapons 50-60 years old without proper ammunition, or not in operating condition. A lot of people simply did not have a clue how to use any kind of weapon so a lot of accidental deaths happened.


I remember people storming abandoned army barracks that was mostly looted, but they found in one building a lot of RPGs while other part of the same building was burning.


Two guys were trying to figure out a single-use RPG, and while they were messing with it clearly not knowing how that thing worked, they accidentally armed it and launched a rocket that flew through the crowd, not hurting anyone and exploding in wall 100 meters from where they stood.


They were smiling, clearly happy because they thought they figured out how that thing worked.


What weapons do you suggest to have for SHTF?


It is a never-ending discussion and a favorite prepper topic, and I must say that whole discussion is overrated.


I have used them in a real situation, and tried and tested lot of different kind of weapons and what works for me may simply not work for you.


For example, here for me good choice is AK-47 rifle, maybe for you wherever you are it is very bad choice.


Good advice is : you need to have a weapon that most people have around you because of multiple reasons: spare parts, repairing, ammunition availability, possibility that you can pick that rifle from other people and you know how to use it.


What caliber and similar is a matter of discussion again. I am talking from the point of owning a rifle.


Another thing is that you need to know how that weapon works. Luckily, most of my readers live in an area where gun laws are great comparing to region where I am.


You have much more choices when it comes to owning a weapon and practicing with it. Use that.


And do not forget that using weapon in a real life situation is not like shooting at beer bottles with your friends after a barbecue.


In real life you might be in a situation to use a weapon while you are tired, dirty, and hungry and while someone is screaming next to you.


It is going to be maybe when you are not ready to do that, maybe in pitch dark, maybe after you have been awake for 48 hours.


At least think about that.


When should you use violence?


Contrary to some popular beliefs in the prepper community, the point is to use violence only as a last solution.


The reason is as I mentioned already, the risk that you can be hurt or killed too, but also once you do violence you change your own rules, or push it more forward, and it is easy to get lost in violence.


There are consequences to that, and you are not going to be the same person ever again.


Violence is a tool, not a toy. You need to know how to use it as best as possible, but also to avoid using it when it is not necessary.


It is a good idea to set up a clear set of rules (mentally too) when you are gonna use violence and to try to stick to it.


For example you will use weapon if someone tries to break your home and attack you, and you need to be ready to do that without hesitation.


What else should we know about post-collapse violence?


Think with your head and research.


One thing that is absolutely important when it comes to understanding how violent it is going to be and what can you expect in your own case of SHTF, is to understand how much media can influence people in making their decisions about violence.


In my case, the media built up situation where people feared so much from other people that they actually hated them. They hated them so much that they actually strip them down from humanity.


In a real-life example, it works in a way that people killed other people, including kids and women, because they hated them so much because media told them.


It may look ridiculous and not possible to you, and you might again think “that can not happen here” but please trust your own resources, look for independent information, not mainstream media, in order to get the right information about what is really happening in the beginning of collapse.


Do not be pulled into “popular opinion” just because the “man from TV” (whoever he might be) told you so.


It is easier today. Because of the internet, you have much more choices for correct information than in my time. But still be careful, you might find yourself rioting together with 500 people just because you trusted some media.


More from Selco 



More information about Selco


Selco survived the Balkan war of the 90s in a city under siege, without electricity, running water, or food distribution.


In his online works, he gives an inside view of the reality of survival under the harshest conditions. He reviews what works and what doesn’t, tells you the hard lessons he learned, and shares how he prepares today.


He never stopped learning about survival and preparedness since the war. Regardless what happens, chances are you will never experience extreme situations like Selco did. But you have the chance to learn from him and how he faced death for months.


Real survival is not romantic or idealistic. It is brutal, hard and unfair. Let Selco take you into that world.


Read more of Selco’s articles here: https://shtfschool.com/blog/


And take advantage of a deep and profound insight into his knowledge and advice by signing up for the outstanding and unrivaled online course. More details here: https://shtfschool.com/survival-boot-camp/




The Pantry Primer


Please feel free to share any information from this article in part or in full, giving credit to the author and including a link to The Organic Prepper and the following bio.


Daisy Luther is the author of The Pantry Primer: A Prepper’s Guide To Whole Food on a Half Price Budget.  Her website, The Organic Prepper, offers information on healthy prepping, including premium nutritional choices, general wellness and non-tech solutions. You can follow Daisy on Facebook and Twitter, and you can email her at daisy@theorganicprepper.ca


Thursday, January 25, 2018

Sweden Hell: Armed Migrant Teens Roaming With Kalashnikovs; Military May Be Deployed

This report was originally published by Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge


malmo


Rosengård district of Malmö. Photo: Johan Nilsson/TT


As we reported last week, Sweden may or may not be preparing for civil conflict – as Prime Minister Stefan Lofven said that the government would do whatever it takes – including deploying the military – to end the wave of gang violence coming primarily from young migrants in the country’s “no-go” zones.


“It’s not my first action to put in a military, but I’m prepared to do what it takes to ensure that the seriously organized crime goes away,” Lofven said after the party leadership discussion in parliament, adding “it is also obvious that there are social problems… …We see criminals with total lack of respect for human life, it’s a terrible development I’m determined to turn around.”Lofven’s comments come on the heels of a spate of gang related murders, including that of a 21-year-old man in Malmö last weekend, shot in the head as he stepped out of a taxi near a grocery store.The same weekend, a 16 year old boy found shot in Rosengård district of Malmö died in the hospital next to a bus stop. Two people were taken in for questioning by the police.

And on January 3rd a 22-year-old man was shot in the Fosie district of Malmö, the day after an 18-year-old woman was taken to the hospital with gunshot wounds ten minutes away in Rosengård.


In Malmö, where a fifth of the 340,000 inhabitants are under 18, children as young as 14 roam the streets with Kalashnikov assault rifles and bulletproof vests. The average age of gang members is 22, the vast majority of them hailing from migrant families. –thetimes.co.uk


The increase in crime has been so overwhelming that Swedish authorities admit they are unable to investigate rape cases right now because of the enormous backlog of gang crime under investigation. “We are forced to choose between two evils,” said police.



Prime Minister Lofven’s strong language also follows an attack on the Rosengård police station last Wednesday after an explosive device was lobbed at the electric-fenced building – the latest in ongoing violence against Swedish peacekeepers.



Rosengard police station was attacked (thetimes.co.uk)



Last August, Stockholm police officer Ted Eriksson, 34, was stabbed in the neck by an Afghan asylum seeker who claimed to be 17 but was suspected of being in his late twenties. The man said he wanted to kill a policeman, however officer Eriksson fortunately suffered minor injuries.




Ted Eriksson (LISA MATTISSON/TT NEWS AGENCY)


In April, 2017, three Swedish female police officers were beaten as they attempted to apprehend a violent refugee.



In 2013, Swedish police were targeted several times during the Stockholm riots – which saw a police station burned down, several officers injured, and rocks thrown at firefighters and other first responders.


(Editor’s Note: The video below does work, despite the screen appearance)



And in 2016, migrants even attacked the crew of ’60 Minutes’ while they were filming a segment on… migrants.



Meanwhile, increasingly powerful weapons have been turning up in Swedish neighborhoods. In 2015, anti-tank missiles were found in a basement of a 36-year-old man suspected of smuggling guns from his brothers in Bosnia into the Swedish no-go zone of Örebro – considered an “Especially vulnerable area” according to a 2017 police report.



The man and five others – described by Bosnian media as linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, were arrested in a series of seven raids. Bosnian Authorities, however, told SVT News that the smugglers are not members of any extremist organizations and have no known links to terrorist activities.


After an investigation following seven raids in mid-2016, Swedish authorities dropped the smuggling charges and prosecuted the Örebro man for possession. He is currently in prison for drug offenses during his ongoing arms-related prosecution.


Police also found a trove of firearms, 16 hand grenades, the four anti-tank missiles pictured above and various other armaments.





Speaking of explosive devices, grenade attacks in Sweden have been on the rise since 2012, although 2017 was a considerably better year, at 10 attacks vs. 34 in 2016.



That year, an 8 year old boy sleeping in the Gothenburg, Sweden living room of relatives was killed by a grenade thrown into the room. “At least five children and several adults were in the flat when the grenade was hurled inside,” according to the BBC, who added that the boy died in his mother’s arms.


And in February, 2017 a man was injured outside of a residence after a grenade was thrown:




It seems, perhaps, that Sweden’s ultra-liberal, open-border, self-described feminist government is realizing they may have screwed up by allowing unchecked migration from Islamic countries associated with terrorism, violence, and perhaps containing people with an axe to grind against the West. As The Times notes:


Sweden has pursued a liberal immigration policy for more than a generation; its government speaks of being a “humanitarian superpower” for having taken in a large number of asylum seekers. After the migrant crisis of 2015, when more than 160,000 people sought asylum, the policy was abruptly changed. Yet there is little debate or reliable data about the integration of the 12% of the population that derive from non-western countries.


For a long time the Swedish establishment played down the decay of immigrant-dominated suburbs, but it can no longer ignore the explosion of violence.


It should also be noted that 70% of migrants coming into Europe as of 2015 were men of fighting age according to a Pew Research Center study.


Even Swedish Democratic party leader Jimmie Akesson “declared war” against organized crime and suggested that Sweden should deploy the military to no-go zones to counter the out of control violence.


“People are shot to death in pizza restaurants, people are killed by hand grenades they find on the street,” Akesson said in parliament on Wednesday.


“This is the new Sweden; the new, exciting dynamic, multicultural paradise that so many here in this assembly … have fought to create for so many years,” he said sarcastically.


And now the Swedish government is distributing survivalism pamphlets (for war with Russia, of course) and considering deploying the military to deal with idealistic gun-toting migrant youth gangs from brutally war-torn countries.


Who could have possibly seen this coming?



Feb, 2017 – Sweden’s Deputy Prime Minister, Feminist Isabella Lövin mocks U.S. President Trump with all-female colleagues – one week before donning hijabs to meet with Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Wednesday, January 3, 2018

Men From “Syria Or Afghanistan” Arrested In German New Year’s Eve Sex Attacks

This report was originally published by Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge


 german-police


German police report 10 arrests have been made for sexual assault

following New Year’s Eve celebrations


Over a dozen arrests were made for New Year’s Eve sex attacks in Germany as women were groped in Berlin and Cologne by “predominantly young men from Syria or Afghanistan,” despite “safety areas” set up to curb sexual offenses. Meanwhile, thugs in France torched nearly 1,000 cars and brutally kicked a French policewoman in the head as other thugs filmed the attack and uploaded it to the internet.






The two officers arrived at the scene of an out of control party in Champigny in the south-east Paris suburb of Champigny-sur-Marne, a 12 minute drive from the “no-go zone” in Noisy-le-Grand.


After they were attacked, the thugs ran into a nearby housing complex after destroying the patrol car – which was turned upside down. One source told the Daily Mail, “The captain had tried to defend the pair using a tear gas canister, but was badly beaten up,” adding “At one stage he produced his service weapon, but did not get a shot off. The female officer has been written off work for at least a week, while the captain will be off for at least 10 days.”


asd


Flipped over police car, Champigny-sur-Marne (Daily Mail)


1


Thugs assault policewoman, Champigny-sur-Marne (Daily Mail)


The incident sparked outrage across France – prompting president Emmanuel Macron to decree that the culprits would be brought to justice, stating “Those guilty of the cowardly and criminal lynching of police doing their duty on the night of December 31st will be found and punished,” adding “Force will support the law. Honour to the police and full support to all the agents attacked in such a low level fashion.”


In Berlin, at least 13 cases of sexual assault were reported on New Year’s Eve despite a widely touted “safety area” set up by the German Red Cross at the Brandenburg Gate – intended to protect women trying to ring in the new year without getting felt up or raped.


A tweet made by the Berlin police reads (translated): “At events to #Welcome2018 in #Berlin so far unfortunately occasional sexual assaults were reported. We do not tolerate such acts. Suspects were arrested.”




Thomas Neuendorf, of Berlin police, told Ruptly that the victims were “groped between their legs and on their buttocks,” adding that the perpetrators were “predominantly young men from Syria or Afghanistan.”


Meanwhile in Cologne, Germany, nine women reported being inappropriately touched during New Year’s Eve celebrations, according to Police – who added that three suspects had been identified and arrested. 


ad


German police frisk a man in front of the Central Station in Cologne (Image: EPA)



In Hamburg, “a very small number” of sexual assaults were reported, while Munich police have yet to report in. “Experience shows that such a thing [sexual assault] often emerges only one or two days later,” said a spokesman for the Munich police.


In 2015, Germany suffered the worst string of New Years Eve attacks in modern history, with over 1,500 criminal cases reported – including one in which “heavily intoxicated” men of “Arab or North African” origin were accused of attacking local women in the Cologne city center.


Automobiles in France didn’t escape the torch this year either, despite the deployment of 90,000 security forces. 945 cars were set on fire in Paris despite some 99,000 soldiers and police officers patrolling the country after two years of high-profile New Year’s Eve attacks.


According to the French interior ministry, most of the cars were either “totally destroyed” or “more lightly affected,” a 17% rise over last year’s car torchings according to The Telegraph. The custom is said to have began in Strasbourg, France in the 1990’s, in the city’s high-immigrant districts – which quickly caught on across the country.


French police arrested 454 people overnight, 301 of which were taken into custody. The French interior ministry had originally released the much lower figure of 650 cars torched, claiming “once again this year, the overall number of vehicles burned demonstrates that, however intolerable, the phenomenon is contained.”


The far-Right Front National, however, denounced what it called the government’s “extremely hazy security record”.


“The new interior minister Bruno Le Roux…(initially) didn’t communicate the number of vehicles burned and considers that the number of cars directly set on fire to be ‘contained’ while even this constitutes a significant rise” the FN said in a statement.


Torched cars, sexual assaults, and thugs beating up the police: just part of life in Europe’s new normal. Just don’t thank Angela Merkel’s “open door” policies for the outcome: you may be branded a extremist who gets their talking points from the KGB, and promptly sequestered.


Friday, December 15, 2017

PCR: "In A Triumph For Feminism Police Say A Mistletoe Kiss Without Consent Is Rape"

Authored by Paul Craig Roberts,


Criminalizing a bit of Christmas fun has to make you wonder...



Is there any aspect of our life left into which the police state does not intrude?


Parents are regulated as to how they discipline their children. Spankings that were the tool of choice in my day are now illegal. Spanking is considered child abuse and can result in state seizure of the child and prosecution of the parent.


The state prescribes the terms on which children can be transported in cars. The cars themselves can only be designed within safety and fuel economy parameters determined by the state.


The unsupervised children at play of my generation no longer exist outside of small towns. Not that long ago I reported on the arrest of a mother on the grounds that she permitted an underage kid to play unsupervised in the front yard of the home on a cul-de-sac. The arrest was made on the false report of a neighbor. The police seized the opportunity to arrest a mother on the basis of “failure to supervise an underage child.” The family was traumatized. The mother was put in jail, the child in Child Protective Custody, and the father rushed home from work to see if he could rescue his family from the intrusion of the American Police State. It has happened to many, and Americans sit there sucking their thumbs, hoping the lion will choose another antelope.


The parents, grandparents, and aunts and uncles of my day would all have been locked up. My entire generation would have been raised in orphanages.


When the state substitutes its judgment for that of parents, it takes the job away from them. Even within the same family children differ. Parents have to find the best approach for each child. Moreover, children who are always supervised never grow up. They learn neither responsibility nor street smarts. Children are even regulated how they can play. No pointing the finger and saying “bang, bang.” Even words are policed, some words no longer being permissible.


Perhaps someone has studied the impact on culture of such intense state intrusion into private life. And there are other culture-changing factors. Consider Identity Politics. The other day I listened to a recording of Barbara Streisand singing “A Woman In Love” from 1980, and Celine Dion’s “The Power of Love” from years ago. Both of these performers are gifted with beautiful and powerful voices. I wondered if they have a counterpart today.


I haven’t time to listen to much music, so I do not know. But the thought occurred to me that these are songs about love between a woman and a man. Moreover, in the official videos, the man is white.


Identity Politics is gradually delegitimizing heterosexual relationships, especially if the male is white, as Identity Politics defines the white heterosexual male as the oppressor of all other races and genders.


Having heard that in “advanced circles” women are subjected to peer pressure not to have relationships with “white, sexist, racist males,” I was wondering if today Streisand would have to have a black lover in her video and whether Dion would have to pitch her song to a lesbian lover.
Otherwise, would they be the hits they were during their time? Indeed, could Dion survive using the politically incorrect word, “lady”?


People are born into what exists. They have no experience of what previously existed. Therefore, they do not know what has been lost. This generational effect is the best ally of the police state.


People born into a country, in which unaccountable police can brutalize and murder and steal, born into a country, the government of which declares itself above both domestic and international law and the US Constitution, a country that ignores constitutional protections such as habeas corpus and due process of law, a country that based on a false claim that the country is indispensable and exceptional claims the right to destroy entire countries whose governments refuse to follow Washington’s orders, a country that claims the right to control explanations and that brands those who tell the truth to be conspiracy theorists, Russian agents, anti-semites, and enemies of the people, know no different. What to my generation is totalitarian horror is normal to them.


That country is the United States of America. It is the most shameful country on earth. The United States is a country whose rulers regard their hegemony as more important than the wellbeing of people and the life of the planet.


If the world is to survive America and if America is to survive as a country in which citizens are permitted free thought, free speech, to make their own decisions, to raise their own children and otherwise to be a free people, Americans will have to get angry at those who are destroying them and reply to the everyday violence that they experience in many different forms with violence of their own.


There are two forces in history. One is ideas. The other is violence. Karl Marx said that ideas, although sometimes effective, such as his own, can become the control mechanism of the ruling class. In contrast, Marx said that violence is the effective force in history.


In Marx’s analysis violence serves the working class, but this is no more than Marx’s assumption. Violence serves those who use it most forcefully.


Today Washington’s violence has brought America up against Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. Washington has outmatched itself.


US President Trump, by seeking protection from Israel against his own government, has re-ignited Arab hostility to Israel and to the US.


Today Israel is alone, defended only by Washington whose own stupidity has created powerful enemies.


Washington has proved itself incapable of leadership. Russia, China, and Iran have proven that they are capable of leadership, and they are also making it clearer by the day that they are fed up with Washington.


It is past time for Americans to get fed up with Washington, its lies and its abuse of power.









Monday, November 20, 2017

Big Brother Is Here: Twitter Will Monitor Users Behavior "Off Platform"

In perhaps the most intrusive move of social media platforms" efforts signal as much virtue as possible and appease their potentially-regulating government overlords, Twitter has announced that it is cracking down on what it defines at hate-speech and not just by looking at its own site.



In what amounts to a major shift in Twitter policy, Mashable"s Kerry Flynn reports that the company announced on Friday that it will be monitoring user"s behavior "on and off the platform" and will suspend a user"s account if they affiliate with violent organizations, according to an update to Twitter"s Help Center on Friday.


Abusive Behavior


We believe in freedom of expression and open dialogue, but that means little as an underlying philosophy if voices are silenced because people are afraid to speak up. In order to ensure that people feel safe expressing diverse opinions and beliefs, we prohibit behavior that crosses the line into abuse, including behavior that harasses, intimidates, or uses fear to silence another user’s voice.


 


Context matters when evaluating for abusive behavior and determining appropriate enforcement actions. Factors we may take into consideration include, but are not limited to whether:


  • the behavior is targeted at an individual or group of people;

  • the report has been filed by the target of the abuse or a bystander;

  • the behavior is newsworthy and in the legitimate public interest.

 


Violence: You may not make specific threats of violence or wish for the serious physical harm, death, or disease of an individual or group of people. This includes, but is not limited to, threatening or promoting terrorism.


 


You also may not affiliate with organizations that - whether by their own statements or activity both on and off the platform - use or promote violence against civilians to further their causes.


 


Abuse: You may not engage in the targeted harassment of someone, or incite other people to do so. We consider abusive behavior an attempt to harass, intimidate, or silence someone else’s voice.


 


Hateful conduct: You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.


 


Hateful imagery and display names: You may not use hateful images or symbols in your profile image or profile header. You also may not use your username, display name, or profile bio to engage in abusive behavior, such as targeted harassment or expressing hate towards a person, group, or protected category.



Furthermore, Twitter says it will control the stream of information more broadly...


At times, we may prevent certain content from trending.



As Kerry Flynn notes, these changes comes amid aggressive moves by Twitter to curb abuse and harassment on the site after more than a decade of essentially letting the abusers operate freely.


Over the last week, Twitter has taken action against the accounts of white supremacists. Twitter permanently banned Tim "Treadstone" Gionet, a prominent alt-right troll more widely known as Baked Alaska, earlier this week. It also removed the verification badges of Jason Kessler, one of the organizers of the racist Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, and of alt-right activist Richard Spencer.



Twitter"s decision to monitor users off site sparked concern from free speech advocates such as Andrew Torba, founder of social network Gab.


"This is a scary precedent to set," he wrote in an email to Mashable.


 


"Rules like this will only force dissidents and those who are speaking truth to power to silence themselves or risk being silenced by Twitter."



Twitter"s new rules will not be enforced until December 18th...



And of course, "if you"re doing nothing wrong, then why would this be an issue for you" will be instant reposte of those defending yet more intrusion within America"s surveillance state.









Friday, November 10, 2017

Mass Shootings, Mass Psychology, And Self-Defense

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,


There is an unfortunate correlation between crises and catastrophes and mass psychology.


For those with a decent long-term memory, you may have noticed that the frequency of attacks and tragedies taking place today around the world is far above and beyond what occurred 10 years ago. So much so that many in the public have moved beyond the point of outrage and have now embraced complacency.


The mass shooting issue, for example, once inspired fevered debate over gun rights. Not so much anymore. While I am happy that the relentless attempts by leftists to exploit every shooting as a tool for their gun grabbing agenda have taken a backseat, I see a trend in another direction which is equally dangerous. That trend is a move towards acceptance that "these things happen," instead of a healthy discussion on real solutions (and no, more gun control is not one of them).


A decade ago the Vegas shooting would have inspired media and social discussion for at least a year. Now, the story disappears in two weeks and is replaced with 10 others. I will be surprised if the latest church shooting in Texas in which 26 people were killed stays on the news feeds for more than a few days.


Where does this complacency come from?


It is a complex problem, but one that I think relates to the state of decline within any particular society. In Carl Jung"s The Undiscovered Self, Jung mentions a consistent element of latent sociopathy and psychopathy within most cultures. Perhaps 10% of people within a society are latent sociopaths and psychopaths, and around 1% or less represent full blown sociopaths/psychopaths. Most of the latent people will never become truly dangerous if they are living within a culture that is healthy and morally balanced. In fact, those with inherent sociopathic traits can become very high functioning human beings who are adept at careers that many other people avoid (surgeons and career soldiers are two examples).


However, in the event that there is cultural rot and a degradation of principles, environmental influences come into play and latent sociopaths/psychopaths have the potential to mutate into something far more dangerous. Jung examines this dynamic as an explanation for the sudden and accelerated decline of Germany in the 1920s and 1930s into totalitarianism and moral relativism. When the mentally disturbed 1% turns into 10% or more, entire nations can be dragged along into the abyss.


As a litmus test I find it valuable to look at popular culture when trying to determine if a society is on the brink of collapse into a singularity of moral relativism, because popular culture often reflects these elements more honestly than the supposed "experts" will. When examining Germany before its fall, I recommend studying the films of Fritz Lang; particularly his movie "M" released in 1931, which depicts a serial killer with a penchant for children being put on trial by a group of underworld criminals, not because they abhor what he does on moral grounds, but because his activities are drawing too much unwanted attention from authorities on their own criminal enterprises. If the dark world of "M" doesn"t perfectly showcase the decline of Germany, I don"t know what does.


Today, we are constantly surrounded by popular culture which leans towards the morally relative; stories in which the heroes must become monsters in order to defeat other supposedly worse monsters.


At another level, our popular culture tells us that it is only the fantastical, the super powered and the government contracted heroes that have the ability to affect change and disrupt disaster.  Underlying all of this seems to be a narrative of defeat; the notion that there is nothing the average person can do.  And, of course, we are also bombarded with stories in which gluttony and decadence are applauded while anyone that takes a more responsible path is portrayed as unhappy or joyless in the long run.


Translate this to the developing trend of mass shootings around the world and the public reaction to them. On one end of the spectrum, in the past it was the sociopathic left that saw mass death as an opportunity to enforce political control over gun rights advocates, with the goal of eventually achieving total disarmament. These people do not care about the dead, let alone logic, they only care about furthering their agenda.  They see government power as the answer to every problem.


If you were to hold up examples like the Paris or Mumbai attacks to gun grabbers and point out that disarmament only makes mass shootings EASIER for criminals and terrorists, they would not listen. Obviously, if any of the citizens including the off-duty police officers had been armed in Paris, the attack might have been stopped much sooner.


In the case of the church shooting near San Antonio, that attack WAS interrupted by an armed neighbor of the church who used his rifle to fend off Devin Kelley, forcing him to escape in his vehicle. Had that neighbor not been armed, the massacre might have gone on much longer. Had one of the people within the church been armed, the attack might have ended in seconds, as we saw in Denver in 2007.


Now, as I said earlier, there are sociopathic members of the political left that seek to take advantage of these scenarios, but these people have fallen by the wayside recently.


On the political right, sadly, I have seen another brand of sociopathy rising, with some arguing that all the people within the San Antonio church that were unarmed "deserved to die." This is just as dangerous a mentality as the exploitations of the left. If the liberty movement itself sets aside empathy and resorts to sensationalist or morally relative methods to drive forward a political agenda, then we are only hastening the fall of our culture, not protecting it. And, we become no better that the leftist disarmament thugs we abhor.


In between these two extremes sits a coagulated mass of people who simply don"t care much as long as a particular disaster doesn"t involve them. These are the folks who are uninterested in solutions and don"t really want to hear anything about it. It is these people who tend to become wreckage floating on the tides of history; their lack of concern eventually comes back to haunt them in the future.


So, if these are the wrong ways to approach the mass shooting problem, then what are the right ways?


I think it is vital that Americans in particular maintain our care and concern for the victims of these events. The solution to mass shootings is clearly a responsibly armed populace.  According to all the stats on active shooters, defense by citizens is the only factor that seems to make much difference. But to convince more and more people of this requires a level of conscience and empathy that inspires confidence, and perhaps brotherhood. When people know that you give a damn and aren;t simply pursuing an agenda like the political left does, it is more likely that they will listen to what you have to say.


As I noted in my article How To Stop All Future Mass Shootings, the Vegas attack was organized by someone who was smart enough to avoid a point-blank engagement in a city and state in which concealed-carry firearms are more common. Point-blank attacks are by far the most common because they are generally attempted by people who have minimal training or because the attackers are relatively certain that their victims will be disarmed in the area they have chosen (gun free zones).


The Vegas attacker (or attackers) chose to use sniper-like tactics to prolong the massacre. However, what this shows is that an armed citizenry is a factor or barrier in how an attack is planned. With properly trained and armed security overwatching major events along with an armed population, there may never be another mass shooting again.


This is what Americans should be talking about, yet, there is no practical discussion on solving the problem. Is this a symptom of impending collapse within our society? Possibly. If there was ever an honorable task for the liberty movement today, it is to inspire solutions and to maintain moral balance. These shootings and other crisis events should not be forgotten within a week. They should at the very least be a learning process, a means by which we evolve our way of life and become more self reliant and by extension more safe.


If you are not a conceal- or open-carry proponent, then you should be. If you understand that the majority of shooting events that are stopped are stopped by average citizens that are armed, then it should only follow that you should become one of those armed citizens. In the meantime, it is not for us who are consistently armed to admonish disarmed victims as if they "deserve what they got." Their failure is our failure as well. For if we are not working diligently to convince others of the importance of citizen self defense, then we have contributed to the conditions that led to these massacres taking place.


There are methods of stemming the tide of social collapse. There are in fact solutions. They begin with each individual acting in small ways and big ways everyday. Complacency and zealotry are the enemy, as well as those that would encourage such mentalities.