Showing posts with label attacks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label attacks. Show all posts

Thursday, May 10, 2018

Iran Claims Israel Attack Was A False Flag

This report was originally published by Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge



In the aftermath of one of the most severe Israeli attacks on Syria “in decades,” Iranian lawmakers said Thursday that Iran had no role in the attack, and that Shia nation doesn’t operate any bases in Syria.


Mohammad Javad Jamali Nobandegani, a member of the Iranian Parliament’s national security and foreign policy committee, said Israel’s claim that Iran had provoked Israel by firing first was “a lie,” adding that “Israel’s history of carrying out unprovoked attacks in Syria has been well-documented.”


“Iran does not have military base in Syria,” Nobandegani added.


And while Iran maintains that last night’s skirmish between the Israeli Defense Force and Syrian Army forces was a false flag, and that the IDF struck first (continuing its pattern of airstrikes and other military assaults in Syria), the IDF boasted Thursday morning that Tehran “will need a lot of time to recover” from the most extensive Israeli attack in Syria since 1974.


Meanwhile, Israel said Iran paid a “heavy price” for its (nonexistent) aggression following multiple Israeli airstrikes against what Tel Aviv said were targets belonging to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp’s Quds Force.


Unsurprisingly, the alleged Iranian attack resulted in no casualties or damage to Israeli infrastructure, with no rockets hitting Israeli-held territory (the Golan Heights border region is considered Syrian territory occupied by Israel).


“Iran will need a lot of time and resources to rehabilitate its operational, military and intelligence infrastructures we hit tonight,” an IDF spokesman said. The spokesman warned that “any other attempt” to hurt Israel will “pay even more.”


A map of the military targets published by the IDF shows multiple sites near Damascus and also near the Syria-Israel border.


Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman claims “all the Iranian infrastructure” in the Arab republic was hit.




During the attack, Israeli jets and mortars struck intelligence sites and arms depots, among other military targets allegedly operated by the Iranian forces. Syria’s SANA state news channel said earlier that a Syrian radar installation was hit in the attack while “tens” of missiles were intercepted.


Though the IDF says it’s not seeking “further escalation,” the IDF says that “the Syrian regime will be held accountable for everything happening in its territory,” and has warned against any retaliatory attack.


“They must understand that if it rains here, it will pour there,” said Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who spoke at the Herzliya security conference near Tel Aviv several hours after the skirmish began.


Lieberman added that Israeli forces remain on high alert, but said he hopes this “chapter” is finished.


Naturally, most Western media like the New York Times – which has repeatedly demonstrated a fervent pro-Israeli bias – opted to take the IDF at its word, a move that drew consternation from independent Syrian journalists.




Of course, in the aftermath of recent attacks on Syria over “chemical attacks” which were alleged but never actually proven, why even bother to verify Iran’s claims when it’s easier to just quote Israel.

Thursday, April 19, 2018

Interview With Boy In ‘Chemical Attack’ Video: ‘We Didn’t See Any Chemical Attack Symptoms’


A new interview with the now infamous boy in the alleged chemical attack video used as a justification for the United States-led bombing of Syria is adding more doubt to the official narrative.  The boy says he was told to go to the hospital where people started dousing him with water.


One of the main “characters” in the footage at the hospital is a water-soaked boy, who is seen being sprayed with water by people who claim to be “rescue workers.” It’s not clear whether they are doctors from the hospital, human rights activists, or White Helmets members. The latter usually make such videos and send them to news agencies, including Reuters.


In what could be the biggest fabrication in recent months, the Douma boy in the chemical attack video and his family have spoken about their ordeal to a Russian TV crew.  It sure appears that the chemical attack was “staged suffering” by the White Helmets.  The boy said that he was asked to go to the hospital, where people “grabbed” him and started “pouring water” over his head for no apparent reason.


Panic, fear, screaming adults, and frightened children featured in the purported footage of the aftermath following the alleged chemical attack in the Eastern Ghouta city. The video has been widely circulated by the mainstream media since April 7 after being posted by the so-called Douma Revolution group and “evidence” of the aftermath of the alleged attack.


A Russian broadcaster VGTRK said it found the boy in the video, who appeared to be 11-year-old Hassan Diab. His story differed from the one presented by the activists and later propagated by the mainstream media.


Hassan said he was in the basement with his mother, who said they ran out of food when they heard some noise outside. When they went outside, they heard random shouting that they should go to the hospital, so they did. “Somebody was shouting that we had to go to the hospital, so we went there. When I came in, some people grabbed me and started pouring water over my head,” he told Evgeny Poddubny, a war correspondent from Russian broadcaster VGTRK. Hassan confirmed that he was the boy in the video, and was very scared when the whole situation unfolded. He is now fine and shows no symptoms of having experienced a chemical attack two weeks ago.


Instagram Photo


In an Instagram post, Poddubny claimed that 11-year-old Hassan got some much-needed food in exchange for his participation in the staged video.  Hassan’s father’s story corroborates his son’s.  The boy was eventually found by his father, who said he didn’t hear about any chemical attack that day. “I went to the hospital, walked upstairs, and found my wife and children. I asked them what had happened, and they said people outside were shouting about some smell and told them to go to the hospital. At the hospital, they gave dates and cookies to the kids,” he said.


One of the medical workers, who was reportedly on shift at the time, said he was surprised by the sudden influx. “Some people came here and washed people. They said: ‘Chemical attack. Chemical attack.’ We didn’t see any chemical attack symptoms,” he added. He did, however, say that there were many people with respiratory problems as a result of dust from recent bombings in the city. British war journalist Robert Fisk also noted that that was the story he’d gotten when speaking with a doctor from Douma.


More importantly, The Independent‘s famous war journalist Robert Fisk haspublished a report which affirms the story so many western government lapdogs have been dismissing as Kremlin propaganda for days now. After interviewing a doctor from the hospital of the area where the Douma attack was supposed to have occurred, Fisk was told by Dr. Assim Rahaibani that what was in actuality an outbreak of respiratory distress among occupants of a dusty oxygen-deprived tunnel was made to look like the aftereffects of a chemical weapons attack when a member of the White Helmets started shouting about a gas attack in front of a bunch of video cameras. Everyone panicked and started hosing themselves down, but in the video, according to Rahaibani, “what you see are people suffering from hypoxia — not gas poisoning.” –SHTFPlan


Moscow is planning to show the video about Hassan’s experience at the next meeting of the United Nations Security Council, Russia’s UN envoy Vassily Nebenzia told Rossiya 1 on Thursday.


The U.S, the U.K., and France launched a coordinated attack on Syria using the video young Hassan says was staged as justification. Also damming for the West was that the timing of the strikes. The announcement of the attack on Syria came hours before the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) team was scheduled to arrive in Douma to determine whether chemical weapons had been used there.  It appears that the West was all too eager to destroy evidence, or lack thereof, of alleged chemical weapons use.

Friday, February 9, 2018

SELCO: The Brutal Truth About Violence When the SHTF

This article was originally published by Daisy Luther at The Organic Prepper


betrayal-3


Selco interviewed by Daisy Luther


Are you prepared for the extreme violence that is likely to come your way if the SHTF? No matter what your plan is, it’s entirely probable that at some point, you’ll be the victim of violence or have to perpetrate violence to survive. As always, Selco is our go-to guy on SHTF reality checks and this thought-provoking interview will shake you to your core.


If you don’t know Selco, he’s from Bosnia and he lived through a year in a city that was blockaded with no utilities, no deliveries of supplies, and no services. In his interviews, he shares what the scenarios the rest of us theorize about were REALLY like. He mentioned to me recently that most folks aren’t prepared for the violence that is part and parcel of a collapse, which brings us to today’s interview.


How prevalent was violence when the SHTF in Bosnia?


It was wartime and chaos, from all conflicts in those years in the Balkan region Bosnian conflict was most brutal because of multiple reasons, historical, political and other.


To simplify the explanation why violence was common and very brutal, you need to picture a situation where you are “bombarded” with huge amount of information (propaganda) which instills in you very strong feelings of fear and hate.


Out of fear and hate, violence grows easy and fast, and over the very short period of time you see how people around you (including you) do things that you could not imagine before.


I can say that violence was almost an everyday thing in the whole spectrum of different activities because it was a fight for survival.


Again, whenever (and wherever) you put people in a region without enough resources, you can expect violence.


We were living a normal life, and then suddenly we were thrown in a way of living where if you could not “negotiate” something with someone, you solve the problem by launching a rocket from an RPG through the window of his living room.


Hate stripped down the layers of humanity and suddenly it was “normal” to level an apartment building with people inside with shells from a tank or form private prisons with imprisoned civilians for slave work or sex slaves.


Nothing that I saw or read before could have prepared me for the level of violence and blindness to it, for the lives of kids, elders, civilians, and the innocent.


Again, the thing that is important for readers is that we were a modern society one day, and then in few weeks it turned into carnage.


Do not make the mistake of saying “it cannot happen here” because I made that mistake too.


Do not underestimate power of propaganda, fear, hate, and the lowest human instincts, no matter how modern and good your society is right now and how deeply you believe that “it can not happen here”.


You’ve mentioned warlords and gangs in several of your articles. Were they responsible for the majority of the violence or was it hungry families?


Fighting of the armies through the whole period of war brings violence in terms of constant shelling from a distance from different kind of weapons.


For example a few multiple rocket launchers (VBR) could bring in 30 seconds the destruction in an area of 3-4 apartment buildings, and being there in that moment and surviving it gives you a completely new view on life.


Snipers were a constant threat and over time you simply grow a way of living that you constant scan area in front of you where your next steps gonna be. Are you gonna be visible and from where? Etc.


Most brutal violence was actually lawlessness and complete lack of order between different factions and militias, so in some periods there were militias or gangs who simply ruled the cities or part of the city where they were absolutely masters of everything in terms of deciding of taking someone’s life.


In lawlessness, you as one person could be really small and not interesting, or join some bigger group of people to be stronger, some family or militia or gang.


An example of a gang would be group of people of some 300 or 500 people who “officially” were a unit or militia and operate for some faction, but in reality they operate mostly for themselves.


That included owning part of the black market, having prison (for forced labor or ransom), attacking people and houses for resources, smuggling people from dangerous areas.


Violence from those kinds of group was the most immediate violence, the most visible in terms of SHTF talking.


If those people came on your door you could obey, fight, or negotiate, but mostly you could not not ask for help from any kind of authority, because there was no real authority.


In any society, no matter where you are living, there are a great number of people who are waiting for the SHTF to go out and do violent things. Small time criminals or simply violent persons who are not openly violent because system is there to punish them for that. It is like that.


Some gang leaders that I knew were actually completely sick people with a strange type of charisma that makes people follow them, weird situations that can happen only in a real collapse.


They are people who just waited for their time to rise.


Those kinds of people together with criminal organization that are already there in any city in the world will be the backbone of SHTF gangs.


Who were the most likely victims?


A very simple answer would be that the most likely victims were people who had interesting things without enough defense.


But it was not always that simple.


For example one of the first houses that got raided in my neighborhood, right at the beginning of collapse while there was still some kind of order, was a rich family’s home.


They had a nice house with bars on the windows, a pretty good setup for defense, and they had enough people inside so they could give pretty good resistance to the mob.


But they got raided simply because they were known that they are rich, so they were attacked with enough force to be overwhelmed.


It was not only about how much manpower you had and how well-organized defense of your home was, it was also about how juicy a target you were.


If you are faced with 150 angry people attacking your home because they are sure you have good stuff inside your chances are low, no matter how good and tough you are.


People who were alone were a pretty easy target and old people without support of family or friends.


It was not always about killing someone or violence. For example, if you were alone and without resources but you had something else valuable like some kind of skill or knowledge you could easily be “recruited” for some faction or group, not by your will of course.


What were some ways to prevent yourself from becoming a victim of violence? How do you recommend that people prepare themselves for the possibility of violence?


It can be done in steps, or in layers.


Do not be interesting (or attract attention) when the SHTF.


This means a lot of things, for this article I can give a few examples with shortened explanations because it is a huge topic:



  • Do not look like a prepper (before or after SHTF). There is no sense in announcing that you are prepping for EMP, civil collapse, apocalypse, or whatever. With that you are risking the probability that when the SHTF, people will remember that you have interesting things in your home

  • Your home should look ordinary. For example, if you are living in the city on a street where all houses look similar, there is not  much sense in making your home look like a fortress. You’ll just attract attention.

  • Your defense should be based on more subtle means. Some examples are having means to reinforce doors and windows quickly when you need it, or to reinforce them from inside. Make changes in your yard to funnel possible attackers where you want them to be (trees, fence, bush…). You can make your home look abandoned or already looted.


Think about what survival is!


Survival is about staying alive, it is not about being comfortable at the expense of losing your life.


I have seen many times people lose their lives simply because they were too attached to their belongings (house, car, land, goods…) so they simply did not want to leave something and run in a particular moment.


Everything can be earned and bought again except life.


Forget about statements like “I will defend it with my life” or “over my dead body” or similar because the real SHTF is usually not heroic or noble. It is hard and brutal. When you are gone you are gone and there might be nobody to take care of your family just because you have been stubborn or trusted in movies when it came to violence.


To rephrase it: Be ready to leave your home in a split second if that means you and your family will survive, no matter how many good things you have stored there.


Be mentally ready for violence


In a way, it is impossible to be ready for violence, especially widespread violence when the SHTF, but you can minimize shock when that happens with some things.


If you are not familiar with what violence is, you can try to get yourself close” to it today (in normal times). It can be done, for example, by doing some voluntary work for example in a local hospital, ER or similar… or simply by working with homeless people.


Sounds maybe strange but activities like this can get you a bit of a feeling of what it is all about, not to mention that you can learn some practical and useful skills for SHTF.


Have means and skills  (physically) to defend – or to do violence


No matter how old or young you are, your gender or religion I assure you that you are capable of doing violence. It is only a matter of the situation and how far you are going to be pushed.


It is not just “some people are capable of violence.” Everybody is capable. Not everybody enjoys doing it or is willing to do it so easily.


In today (normal times) you can learn some violence skills and you should do it, again no matter if you are a woman or old or young.


You should own a weapon and know how to use it. You should practice with it, or have at least some basic knowledge about hand-to-hand combat.


The worst case scenario is to have a weapon that you try for the first time when SHTF.


Be familiar with your means for defense, let your family members know what they need to do in case of attack of your home, have plan, and go through it.


Only through practice will you minimize chances for mistakes.


Use common sense


I know lot of survivalists almost dream about how they are going to use weapons against bad guys when SHTF, and that they will be something like super heroes from movies, saving innocents and killing villains.


Truth is that in a real collapse, a lot of things are kind of blurred and you are not sure who the bad guys are. Good guys turn out to be lunatic gang members who want to bring food to their kids.


There are no super heroes when SHTF, and if some of them show up they end up dead quickly.


There is only you and your skills and mindset and what you prepared.


Use  violence as a last resort because of the simple fact that by using violence you are risking of getting killed or hurt. Remember when SHTF there is maybe no doctor or hospital to take care of your wound.


It is a time when even a small cut can eventually kill you through infection and lack of proper care.


I’m a single mom with a household full of girls. In an SHTF situation, what would our best strategies be to remain safe?


Just like I have mentioned before, strategy is always same for any part of survival, and shooting from the rifle is pretty similar no matter are you man or woman.


Being single mom with household full of girls on first look make you as a ideal target in some situations, but we are talking here in prepper terms so there is no reason not to be perfectly well prepared as a single mom with girls.


But yes I admit it is not perfect situation, even if you are prepared well, some things are sure, you need to connect with other people even more.


House with couple of girls will always look like easy prey for some people.


It is like that.


Were people in the city safer than people in the country? Can you tell us more about rural living during this time?


In my case definitely no.


In the essence it always come to the resources and people.


City meant more people less resources, country (rural) meant less people more resources, and because that level of violence simply was lower. That was most important reason.


There are few more reasons why it was much better in the country.


People in the country (rural settings) were much more “connected to ground”  they were more tough if you like, they grew their own food, had cattle, lived more simple life prior SHTF and when everything collapsed they had less problems getting use to it.


Yes they also did not have electricity and phones, running water or connection to other places but they adapted easier to the new life because they had more useful skills then people in the city.


Life was harder for them too than prior to the collapse, but they had means to get resources: land, woods, river…


Another thing is that people in small rural communities “in the country” were more connected to each other, people knew their neighborhood and some things were easier to organize, like community security watch, help in case of diseases and similar.


What types of weapons did people have for self-defense?


It was different political system prior the collapse where it was not so usual to own a weapon legally. And to own one illegally could mean a lot of troubles.


Right prior to SHTF, it became possible to buy different weapons on the black market but still, a majority of people did not own weapons.


When it all collapsed, it was possible to get a weapon through trade.


Because of the military doctrine here prior to the collapse, we used “East Bloc” weapons. A favorite was AK-47 in all different kind of editions, or older weapons like M-48 rifle, SKS rifle, 22 and similar.


People used what they had, so in one period you would be lucky if you had any kind of pistol and knife.


Later through the different channels weapon become more available so people had them more. A lot of that was actually junk that some warlords somehow “imported”.


Weapons 50-60 years old without proper ammunition, or not in operating condition. A lot of people simply did not have a clue how to use any kind of weapon so a lot of accidental deaths happened.


I remember people storming abandoned army barracks that was mostly looted, but they found in one building a lot of RPGs while other part of the same building was burning.


Two guys were trying to figure out a single-use RPG, and while they were messing with it clearly not knowing how that thing worked, they accidentally armed it and launched a rocket that flew through the crowd, not hurting anyone and exploding in wall 100 meters from where they stood.


They were smiling, clearly happy because they thought they figured out how that thing worked.


What weapons do you suggest to have for SHTF?


It is a never-ending discussion and a favorite prepper topic, and I must say that whole discussion is overrated.


I have used them in a real situation, and tried and tested lot of different kind of weapons and what works for me may simply not work for you.


For example, here for me good choice is AK-47 rifle, maybe for you wherever you are it is very bad choice.


Good advice is : you need to have a weapon that most people have around you because of multiple reasons: spare parts, repairing, ammunition availability, possibility that you can pick that rifle from other people and you know how to use it.


What caliber and similar is a matter of discussion again. I am talking from the point of owning a rifle.


Another thing is that you need to know how that weapon works. Luckily, most of my readers live in an area where gun laws are great comparing to region where I am.


You have much more choices when it comes to owning a weapon and practicing with it. Use that.


And do not forget that using weapon in a real life situation is not like shooting at beer bottles with your friends after a barbecue.


In real life you might be in a situation to use a weapon while you are tired, dirty, and hungry and while someone is screaming next to you.


It is going to be maybe when you are not ready to do that, maybe in pitch dark, maybe after you have been awake for 48 hours.


At least think about that.


When should you use violence?


Contrary to some popular beliefs in the prepper community, the point is to use violence only as a last solution.


The reason is as I mentioned already, the risk that you can be hurt or killed too, but also once you do violence you change your own rules, or push it more forward, and it is easy to get lost in violence.


There are consequences to that, and you are not going to be the same person ever again.


Violence is a tool, not a toy. You need to know how to use it as best as possible, but also to avoid using it when it is not necessary.


It is a good idea to set up a clear set of rules (mentally too) when you are gonna use violence and to try to stick to it.


For example you will use weapon if someone tries to break your home and attack you, and you need to be ready to do that without hesitation.


What else should we know about post-collapse violence?


Think with your head and research.


One thing that is absolutely important when it comes to understanding how violent it is going to be and what can you expect in your own case of SHTF, is to understand how much media can influence people in making their decisions about violence.


In my case, the media built up situation where people feared so much from other people that they actually hated them. They hated them so much that they actually strip them down from humanity.


In a real-life example, it works in a way that people killed other people, including kids and women, because they hated them so much because media told them.


It may look ridiculous and not possible to you, and you might again think “that can not happen here” but please trust your own resources, look for independent information, not mainstream media, in order to get the right information about what is really happening in the beginning of collapse.


Do not be pulled into “popular opinion” just because the “man from TV” (whoever he might be) told you so.


It is easier today. Because of the internet, you have much more choices for correct information than in my time. But still be careful, you might find yourself rioting together with 500 people just because you trusted some media.


More from Selco 



More information about Selco


Selco survived the Balkan war of the 90s in a city under siege, without electricity, running water, or food distribution.


In his online works, he gives an inside view of the reality of survival under the harshest conditions. He reviews what works and what doesn’t, tells you the hard lessons he learned, and shares how he prepares today.


He never stopped learning about survival and preparedness since the war. Regardless what happens, chances are you will never experience extreme situations like Selco did. But you have the chance to learn from him and how he faced death for months.


Real survival is not romantic or idealistic. It is brutal, hard and unfair. Let Selco take you into that world.


Read more of Selco’s articles here: https://shtfschool.com/blog/


And take advantage of a deep and profound insight into his knowledge and advice by signing up for the outstanding and unrivaled online course. More details here: https://shtfschool.com/survival-boot-camp/




The Pantry Primer


Please feel free to share any information from this article in part or in full, giving credit to the author and including a link to The Organic Prepper and the following bio.


Daisy Luther is the author of The Pantry Primer: A Prepper’s Guide To Whole Food on a Half Price Budget.  Her website, The Organic Prepper, offers information on healthy prepping, including premium nutritional choices, general wellness and non-tech solutions. You can follow Daisy on Facebook and Twitter, and you can email her at daisy@theorganicprepper.ca


Saturday, August 19, 2017

‘Let’s Get Rid of Mount Rushmore’; Anti-Confederate Movement Spreads To Founders

‘Let’s Get Rid of Mount Rushmore’; Anti-Confederate Movement Spreads To Founders

Image source: Pixabay.com



The attack on statues of Confederate leaders has now spread to the Founding Fathers and even Abraham Lincoln.


Op-Eds and news articles around the web chronicle proposals and actual efforts to erase America’s history from the public square. Some of the most disturbing efforts include:


Blasting Mount Rushmore


“Let’s Get Rid of Mount Rushmore” – the headline on a Vice op-ed by Wilbert L. Cooper reads.


“Fact is, I’m not sure there is any American president worthy of being etched into the side of a 60-foot mountain with explosives and jackhammers,” Cooper wrote. “I mean, every single one has at least been partially complicit in horrific atrocities.


Put God Back Into History And Teach Your Kids What They Won’t Learn Anywhere Else!


“… Obviously, Washington and Thomas Jefferson were remarkable individuals who helped usurp British rule in America and, eventually, establish a new empire. But they also enslaved their fellow man, committing special kinds of inhumane acts that should never be confined to footnotes. Unfortunately, that is exactly how those troublesome truths are treated when you face the awesome grandeur of Rushmore, a monument so incredible it obscures the multifaceted nature of these old dudes, transmogrifying them from individuals with a capacity both for greatness and evil into pure American deities.”


Interestingly enough, Cooper says he’d oppose a statue of Obama, too. Obama ordered some morally questionable actions, including drone strikes and unconstitutional surveillance programs, Cooper wrote.


“What I am suspicious of are monuments produced by the state, which tend to flatten out nuances and turn flawed individuals into tools of propaganda that bolster a kind of religious patriotism,” he wrote.


In Chicago, Bishop James Dukes, pastor of Liberation Christian Center, wants a statue of George Washington removed in his community and a street named for Andrew Jackson to be changed.


Lincoln Under Attack


A bust of Abraham Lincoln on Chicago’s Southside was vandalized and burned on Wednesday, NBC 5 TV reported. The statue was erected in 1926.


“What an absolute disgraceful act of vandalism,” Chicago Alderman Raymond Lopez wrote on Facebook.


Monument to Supreme Court Justice Removed


A crane lifted a monument to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert B. Taney from a pedestal in front of the Old State House in Annapolis, Md., on Thursday, CBS Baltimore reported. Taney wrote the infamous Dred Scott decision in 1857 declaring that African-Americans were not US citizens.


Taney remained loyal to the Union during the Civil War and remained on the job until his death in 1865. A group cheered as the statue was removed.


Blasting Stone Mountain?


A gigantic carving of Confederate President Jefferson Davis and Generals Robert E. Lee and “Stonewall” Jackson should be blasted off the side of Stone Mountain in Georgia, Hontas Farmer wrote at Science20.com.


“Sign this petition if you don’t want to be defined forever by the face of traitors arguably worse than Benedict Arnold, who fought for a version of slavery which was more dehumanizing than even that practiced by George Washington,” Farmer wrote. She was referring to a MoveOn.org petition.


“Those men were traitors at best,” Farmer complained. “They are in the same league as Benedict Arnold.”


Confederate Reenactors Attacked


A man attacked Civil War reenactors dressed as Confederate soldiers with pepper spray at a parade in Newton, N.C., WSCO TV reported. The reenactors were taking part in the 128th Annual Soldiers’ Reunion Parade.


Things might have been much worse. Karl Smith, the man who pepper-sprayed the reenactors, was carrying a revolver when police arrested him, WSCO reported.


Do you think the Confederate statues should be removed? Share your thoughts in the section below:

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

The Mystery of Wikileaks’ Cryptic “Vault 7”: Do You Know What This Means?

wikileaks-insurance-leak-document-encrypted-si_-e1476470042793


This article was written by Melissa Dykes and originally published at The Daily Sheeple.


Editor’s Comment: It seems that there is more mysterious to be had with Wikileaks and other hactivists working to expose the system. Their role in the election defeat of Hillary was huge, but will they now expose a bigger piece on the board? Is there hypocrisy and misdeeds further into the system? Of course. Does it have anything to do with major crimes and tricks pulled by the shadow government? Will something as big as 9/11 ever be porven for what it is?


There is no way to know the answer to these questions until or unless Wikileaks brings us into the loop… until then, feel free to speculate and put together your own pieces.


The Mystery of Wikileaks’ Cryptic “Vault 7”: Do You Know What This Means?


by Melissa Dykes


Starting on February 4th, each day Wikileaks began sending out a series of cryptic question Tweets teasing the world about “Vault 7”.


The questions were framed in Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How format (but not in that order). Each came with an image “clue”.


Here they are in chronological order starting with the earliest.














The first image, What, is the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, also referred to as the “doomsday seed vault” in Norway.


The second image, Where, reportedly shows a cave Nazis used to store gold and other valuables in during World War II.


The third image, When, has been located here:


C3-PZxcWYAAa330


The fourth image, Who, shows whistleblowers Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden, and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange on newspapers under the headline “infamous spies”.


The fifth image, Why, shows a welder… and gives us yet another Air Force reference.


2017-02-13_12-08-15


The sixth and final image asks “How did #Vault7 make its way to WikiLeaks?” and shows us a retro image of a woman in a beret mailing something at a mailbox.


So… What, Where, When, Who, Why and How did WikiLeaks Acquire Vault 7?


People have a lot of theories on what this series of Tweets refers to.


First, the Tweet Wikileaks sent immediately before its first Vault 7 Tweet had to do with the FBI releasing “Vault 6” of Hillary Clinton’s emails.




Others, however, think it might have something to do with 9/11 and Building 7, considering the references to gold vaults, welding, and drones.








Maybe its about both, considering Hillary Clinton was a New York senator at the time of the 9/11 attacks.


Either way, thousands of people are waiting on pins and needles wondering if Wikileaks is going to deliver on its conspiracy theory scavenger hunt. With a build up like that, it better be something good.


We could use a little truth in this world right about now…


This article was written by Melissa Dykes and originally published at The Daily Sheeple.

Friday, December 16, 2016

Economics, Immigration and Terrorism: Europeans “Could See Civil War, Unrest And Utter Chaos”


europe-break2


Are we witnessing the end of the EU as we know it?


Things have become so utterly unstable in the European forecast that experts are now expecting to see full on clashes, and eventually, even civil war in the streets.


The pressure of increasing terror attacks in major EU countries, a populist revolt against economic tyranny and the ongoing refugee crisis have been threatening to bust open the seams of order.


Europe is said to be “on the brink,” as things are coming to a head, and drastic measures are being considered to keep order and maintain EU authority against a tide of uprisings.


The European Union itself could fall under votes against its authority, now in the UK and in Italy.


via the UK Daily Star:



It comes after months of warnings from experts – including top military brasses – that massive economic issues, mass immigration, and terrorism will lead to a full-scale crisis.


They have predicted this will affect the entire continent, eventually leading to civil war on the streets.



It seems that Switzerland’s Lieutenant General and Chief of the Armed Forces, André Blattmann, has foreseen what is to come. He warned last year:



[T]he combination of hybrid wars, the economy, and the refugee crisis would have “unforeseen dimensions”.


He then claimed social unrest was something Europe’s leaders and armies had to be prepared for.



The Swiss might be historically neutral, but they aren’t blind to the upheaval that could threaten stability both at home in their independent nation, and surrounding them on the rest of the European continent.


The Swiss population is armed and trained; meanwhile, disarmed countries, including Germany and Austria, are buying up pepper spray and other self-defense tools, while their governments are warning them to be prepared for domestic war, and to keep at least 10 days of storable food on hand along with other emergencies supplies.


The situation is, and has been, very serious. And things are only escalating from there.


Of course, the agenda of Muslim and extremists is only driving more populist pressure to restrict immigration, and restore nativist and nationalist policies – which is making the whole cycle more grandiose, and more destined for a clash.


Terrorists incidents have been particularly shocking over the past several years, with gunmen, vehicle drivers and the like carrying out random attacks, and often killing dozens or even hundreds in the commission of their crimes.


Some experts in Europe are even claiming that members of ISIS and other Muslim extremists are carrying out violent attacks with the express purpose of inciting widespread hatred against Muslim immigrants, and thereby sparking a bigger reaction, a greater division and the rise of a Caliphate to create a new order out of the chaos:



French scholar of Islam, Gilles Kepel, told German newspaper Die Welt that the eventual goal of Islamic terrorism was not to simply murder western people in Europe.


He explained the purpose of bloody and vicious attacks on innocent people is to incite hatred among the general population of Muslims in general… encourag[ing] more young believers to take up arms against westerners which would eventually lead to civil war on the streets.



This is madness… and there is no sign of its stopping!


Rapefugees attack and wound Swedish policeman


European CIVIL WAR – Europe vs Islam – Islam vs The World


Lawless Berlin Where invaders and Rapefugees are terrorizing


WARNING from Ex- MI6 HEAD: EUROPE FACES “POPULIST UPRISING”


Read more:


Trump: Muslim Migration “Destroying Europe, I’m Not Gonna Let That Happen To The U.S.”


European Official Warns: “The Whole System Will Completely Break Down”


Under Siege By Terrorism, Germany Warns “Population Obliged to Hold Supply of Food For 10 Days”


ISIS Sends 400 Trained Fighters to Europe To Attack From “Interlocking, Semiautonomous Cells”


Invaded and Overrun: Is Putin “Weaponizing Refugees To Break Europe”?



Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.

Advanced Tactical Gas Mask

Please Spread The Word And Share This Post






Author: Mac Slavo
Views: Read by 35 people
Date: December 16th, 2016
Website: www.SHTFplan.com


Copyright Information: Copyright SHTFplan and Mac Slavo. This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.shtfplan.com. Please contact us for permission to reproduce this content in other media formats.