Showing posts with label mass murder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mass murder. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Big Pharma Paid Millions in Secret Settlements After Antidepressants Linked to Mass Murder

 Big Pharma Paid Millions in Secret Settlements After Antidepressants Linked to Mass Murder | Big-Pharma-medicine-pills-money | Big Pharma General Health Medical & Health Special Interests US News


By Rachel Blevins, thefreethoughtproject.com


Every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of people who automatically question whether the suspect had mental health issues or was taking prescription medications such as antidepressants.


While history has shown that the most notorious mass shooters in this century were taking antidepressants or Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) before they carried out the deadly rampages, there are a number of killings that have been linked directly to the dangerous drugs. In fact, the pharmaceutical companies behind the most popular SSRI’s have paid hundreds of millions of dollars in damages:


Eli Lilly Paid Secret Settlements to Survivors After Man on Prozac Went on Shooting Rampage in 1989


Joseph T. Wesbecker, 47, carried out a mass shooting in which he shot 20 workers at Standard Gravure Corp. in Kentucky, in September 1989. Eight of the victims were fatally wounded, and Wesbecker ended the rampage by shooting and killing himself.


Just one month earlier, Wesbecker had started taking the antidepressant Prozac, which included side effects such as “obsession with suicide and dangerously violent behavior,” according to an article in the American Journal of Psychiatry.


When the survivors of the shooting filed a lawsuit against Eli Lilly arguing that it had known about the propensity of Prozac to cause violent outbursts and suicidal tendencies, the company convinced the victims to agree to secret settlements outside of court.


GlaxoSmithKline Paid $6.4 Million to the Family of a Man Who Murdered Three Family Members Hours After Taking Paxil in 1998


Donald Schell, 60, was prescribed the antidepressant Paxil to treat depression in Wyoming in February 1998. Within hours of taking the first dosage, he burst into a fit of rage and fatally shot his wife, Rita; their daughter, Deborah Tobin; and their 9-month-old granddaughter, Alyssa.


Schell then shot and killed himself. His remaining family members filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company behind Paxil, and they were awarded $6.4 million based on “the company’s failure to sufficiently warn doctors and patients that the effects of the drug could include agitation and violence.”


GlaxoSmithKline Also Paid $3 Million to the Widow of a Man Who Committed Suicide After Taking Paxil in 2010


Stewart Dolin, 57, was working as a corporate attorney in Illinois when he was prescribed the generic version of the antidepressant Paxil for depression and anxiety. While taking the drug, he committed suicide by jumping in front of a Chicago Transit Authority train.


His widow, Wendy Dolin, filed a lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline, arguing that the company failed to warn her husband’s doctor that the drug he was being prescribed would increase his risk of suicidal behavior, which led to his death.


“This for me has not just been about the money. This has always been about awareness to a health issue, and the public has to be aware of this,” Wendy Dolin told the Chicago Tribune after she was awarded $3 million in compensation.


While the cases mentioned above are notable because they received significant media attention, there is still an overwhelming number of lawsuits that stemmed from cases in which pharmaceutical companies paid millions of dollars for failing to warn doctors that the antidepressants they were prescribing could drive patients to kill themselves and others.


According to reports, the first lawsuit involving a Paxil suicide case went to trial in 2001, and since then, GlaxoSmithKline has paid more than $390 million in settlements or verdicts for Paxil-related cases. If that is the price they are willing to pay, then the profit they are making off of the controversial drug must be incredible.


The post Big Pharma Paid Millions in Secret Settlements After Antidepressants Linked to Mass Murder appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Big Pharma Paid Millions in Secret Settlements After Antidepressants Linked to Mass Murder

 Big Pharma Paid Millions in Secret Settlements After Antidepressants Linked to Mass Murder | Big-Pharma-medicine-pills-money | Big Pharma General Health Medical & Health Special Interests US News


By Rachel Blevins, thefreethoughtproject.com


Every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of people who automatically question whether the suspect had mental health issues or was taking prescription medications such as antidepressants.


While history has shown that the most notorious mass shooters in this century were taking antidepressants or Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) before they carried out the deadly rampages, there are a number of killings that have been linked directly to the dangerous drugs. In fact, the pharmaceutical companies behind the most popular SSRI’s have paid hundreds of millions of dollars in damages:


Eli Lilly Paid Secret Settlements to Survivors After Man on Prozac Went on Shooting Rampage in 1989


Joseph T. Wesbecker, 47, carried out a mass shooting in which he shot 20 workers at Standard Gravure Corp. in Kentucky, in September 1989. Eight of the victims were fatally wounded, and Wesbecker ended the rampage by shooting and killing himself.


Just one month earlier, Wesbecker had started taking the antidepressant Prozac, which included side effects such as “obsession with suicide and dangerously violent behavior,” according to an article in the American Journal of Psychiatry.


When the survivors of the shooting filed a lawsuit against Eli Lilly arguing that it had known about the propensity of Prozac to cause violent outbursts and suicidal tendencies, the company convinced the victims to agree to secret settlements outside of court.


GlaxoSmithKline Paid $6.4 Million to the Family of a Man Who Murdered Three Family Members Hours After Taking Paxil in 1998


Donald Schell, 60, was prescribed the antidepressant Paxil to treat depression in Wyoming in February 1998. Within hours of taking the first dosage, he burst into a fit of rage and fatally shot his wife, Rita; their daughter, Deborah Tobin; and their 9-month-old granddaughter, Alyssa.


Schell then shot and killed himself. His remaining family members filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company behind Paxil, and they were awarded $6.4 million based on “the company’s failure to sufficiently warn doctors and patients that the effects of the drug could include agitation and violence.”


GlaxoSmithKline Also Paid $3 Million to the Widow of a Man Who Committed Suicide After Taking Paxil in 2010


Stewart Dolin, 57, was working as a corporate attorney in Illinois when he was prescribed the generic version of the antidepressant Paxil for depression and anxiety. While taking the drug, he committed suicide by jumping in front of a Chicago Transit Authority train.


His widow, Wendy Dolin, filed a lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline, arguing that the company failed to warn her husband’s doctor that the drug he was being prescribed would increase his risk of suicidal behavior, which led to his death.


“This for me has not just been about the money. This has always been about awareness to a health issue, and the public has to be aware of this,” Wendy Dolin told the Chicago Tribune after she was awarded $3 million in compensation.


While the cases mentioned above are notable because they received significant media attention, there is still an overwhelming number of lawsuits that stemmed from cases in which pharmaceutical companies paid millions of dollars for failing to warn doctors that the antidepressants they were prescribing could drive patients to kill themselves and others.


According to reports, the first lawsuit involving a Paxil suicide case went to trial in 2001, and since then, GlaxoSmithKline has paid more than $390 million in settlements or verdicts for Paxil-related cases. If that is the price they are willing to pay, then the profit they are making off of the controversial drug must be incredible.


The post Big Pharma Paid Millions in Secret Settlements After Antidepressants Linked to Mass Murder appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Friday, November 10, 2017

Mass Shootings, Mass Psychology, And Self-Defense

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,


There is an unfortunate correlation between crises and catastrophes and mass psychology.


For those with a decent long-term memory, you may have noticed that the frequency of attacks and tragedies taking place today around the world is far above and beyond what occurred 10 years ago. So much so that many in the public have moved beyond the point of outrage and have now embraced complacency.


The mass shooting issue, for example, once inspired fevered debate over gun rights. Not so much anymore. While I am happy that the relentless attempts by leftists to exploit every shooting as a tool for their gun grabbing agenda have taken a backseat, I see a trend in another direction which is equally dangerous. That trend is a move towards acceptance that "these things happen," instead of a healthy discussion on real solutions (and no, more gun control is not one of them).


A decade ago the Vegas shooting would have inspired media and social discussion for at least a year. Now, the story disappears in two weeks and is replaced with 10 others. I will be surprised if the latest church shooting in Texas in which 26 people were killed stays on the news feeds for more than a few days.


Where does this complacency come from?


It is a complex problem, but one that I think relates to the state of decline within any particular society. In Carl Jung"s The Undiscovered Self, Jung mentions a consistent element of latent sociopathy and psychopathy within most cultures. Perhaps 10% of people within a society are latent sociopaths and psychopaths, and around 1% or less represent full blown sociopaths/psychopaths. Most of the latent people will never become truly dangerous if they are living within a culture that is healthy and morally balanced. In fact, those with inherent sociopathic traits can become very high functioning human beings who are adept at careers that many other people avoid (surgeons and career soldiers are two examples).


However, in the event that there is cultural rot and a degradation of principles, environmental influences come into play and latent sociopaths/psychopaths have the potential to mutate into something far more dangerous. Jung examines this dynamic as an explanation for the sudden and accelerated decline of Germany in the 1920s and 1930s into totalitarianism and moral relativism. When the mentally disturbed 1% turns into 10% or more, entire nations can be dragged along into the abyss.


As a litmus test I find it valuable to look at popular culture when trying to determine if a society is on the brink of collapse into a singularity of moral relativism, because popular culture often reflects these elements more honestly than the supposed "experts" will. When examining Germany before its fall, I recommend studying the films of Fritz Lang; particularly his movie "M" released in 1931, which depicts a serial killer with a penchant for children being put on trial by a group of underworld criminals, not because they abhor what he does on moral grounds, but because his activities are drawing too much unwanted attention from authorities on their own criminal enterprises. If the dark world of "M" doesn"t perfectly showcase the decline of Germany, I don"t know what does.


Today, we are constantly surrounded by popular culture which leans towards the morally relative; stories in which the heroes must become monsters in order to defeat other supposedly worse monsters.


At another level, our popular culture tells us that it is only the fantastical, the super powered and the government contracted heroes that have the ability to affect change and disrupt disaster.  Underlying all of this seems to be a narrative of defeat; the notion that there is nothing the average person can do.  And, of course, we are also bombarded with stories in which gluttony and decadence are applauded while anyone that takes a more responsible path is portrayed as unhappy or joyless in the long run.


Translate this to the developing trend of mass shootings around the world and the public reaction to them. On one end of the spectrum, in the past it was the sociopathic left that saw mass death as an opportunity to enforce political control over gun rights advocates, with the goal of eventually achieving total disarmament. These people do not care about the dead, let alone logic, they only care about furthering their agenda.  They see government power as the answer to every problem.


If you were to hold up examples like the Paris or Mumbai attacks to gun grabbers and point out that disarmament only makes mass shootings EASIER for criminals and terrorists, they would not listen. Obviously, if any of the citizens including the off-duty police officers had been armed in Paris, the attack might have been stopped much sooner.


In the case of the church shooting near San Antonio, that attack WAS interrupted by an armed neighbor of the church who used his rifle to fend off Devin Kelley, forcing him to escape in his vehicle. Had that neighbor not been armed, the massacre might have gone on much longer. Had one of the people within the church been armed, the attack might have ended in seconds, as we saw in Denver in 2007.


Now, as I said earlier, there are sociopathic members of the political left that seek to take advantage of these scenarios, but these people have fallen by the wayside recently.


On the political right, sadly, I have seen another brand of sociopathy rising, with some arguing that all the people within the San Antonio church that were unarmed "deserved to die." This is just as dangerous a mentality as the exploitations of the left. If the liberty movement itself sets aside empathy and resorts to sensationalist or morally relative methods to drive forward a political agenda, then we are only hastening the fall of our culture, not protecting it. And, we become no better that the leftist disarmament thugs we abhor.


In between these two extremes sits a coagulated mass of people who simply don"t care much as long as a particular disaster doesn"t involve them. These are the folks who are uninterested in solutions and don"t really want to hear anything about it. It is these people who tend to become wreckage floating on the tides of history; their lack of concern eventually comes back to haunt them in the future.


So, if these are the wrong ways to approach the mass shooting problem, then what are the right ways?


I think it is vital that Americans in particular maintain our care and concern for the victims of these events. The solution to mass shootings is clearly a responsibly armed populace.  According to all the stats on active shooters, defense by citizens is the only factor that seems to make much difference. But to convince more and more people of this requires a level of conscience and empathy that inspires confidence, and perhaps brotherhood. When people know that you give a damn and aren;t simply pursuing an agenda like the political left does, it is more likely that they will listen to what you have to say.


As I noted in my article How To Stop All Future Mass Shootings, the Vegas attack was organized by someone who was smart enough to avoid a point-blank engagement in a city and state in which concealed-carry firearms are more common. Point-blank attacks are by far the most common because they are generally attempted by people who have minimal training or because the attackers are relatively certain that their victims will be disarmed in the area they have chosen (gun free zones).


The Vegas attacker (or attackers) chose to use sniper-like tactics to prolong the massacre. However, what this shows is that an armed citizenry is a factor or barrier in how an attack is planned. With properly trained and armed security overwatching major events along with an armed population, there may never be another mass shooting again.


This is what Americans should be talking about, yet, there is no practical discussion on solving the problem. Is this a symptom of impending collapse within our society? Possibly. If there was ever an honorable task for the liberty movement today, it is to inspire solutions and to maintain moral balance. These shootings and other crisis events should not be forgotten within a week. They should at the very least be a learning process, a means by which we evolve our way of life and become more self reliant and by extension more safe.


If you are not a conceal- or open-carry proponent, then you should be. If you understand that the majority of shooting events that are stopped are stopped by average citizens that are armed, then it should only follow that you should become one of those armed citizens. In the meantime, it is not for us who are consistently armed to admonish disarmed victims as if they "deserve what they got." Their failure is our failure as well. For if we are not working diligently to convince others of the importance of citizen self defense, then we have contributed to the conditions that led to these massacres taking place.


There are methods of stemming the tide of social collapse. There are in fact solutions. They begin with each individual acting in small ways and big ways everyday. Complacency and zealotry are the enemy, as well as those that would encourage such mentalities.









Sunday, October 8, 2017

Harvard Trained Psychiatrist Says Medication Could Have Caused Vegas Shooter’s Madness

paddock

Dr. Peter R. Breggin, psychiatrist and leading expert in the field of anti-depressant induced mass murders said, “It’s premature, really at this point,” to determine if psychiatric medicines such as anti-depressants were being taken by Stephen Paddock.


Author of more than 20 books and publications including Medication Madness: The role of Psychiatric drugs in cases of Violence, Suicide, and Murder, Breggin said just because we know the mass murderer was taking benzodiazepines, “doesn’t tell us a lot yet,” the doctor stated but later explained it should be a starting point in the search for explanations.


In a Free Thought Project exclusive, Dr. Breggin acknowledged that sedatives such as Diazepam are often given in conjunction with anti-depressants. He said doctors do so;



Often because the anti-depressant tends to be stimulating and doctors have learned that, and they often give a sedating drug  (such as Diazepam) along with them (anti-depressants).



Anti-depressants have often been blamed by families of those accused of homicide and mass murder, and even by the murderers themselves. David Crespi, a Matthews, NC banker is one such person. In 2006, Crespi was at one minute playing with his daughters, and the next minute he was stabbing his two twin daughters to death. According to WSOC TV9,


Advertisment




he and his family appeared in a Danish documentary in 2013, in which he insisted, as he has for years, that his decision to chase his young daughters through the house before stabbing them a total of 32 times was the result of a psychotic episode brought on by prescription medication he was taking to treat depression.



If Americans are in shock with Paddock’s actions they only need to be reminded of another mass murderer who killed nearly three times as many people as Paddock. Andreas Lubitz, pilot of Germanwings flight 9525, killed all 150 of the passengers aboard his plane when he flew it into a mountain in the French Alps. According to reports, Lubitz was taking several anti-depressants including Celexa, at the time he flew his passenger plane under controlled flight into terrain. According to Forbes, along with Lorazepam, Lubitz was taking:


  • Mirtazapine–the generic name for Remeron, an atypical antidepressant that affects norepinephrine and serotonin neurotransmission but is not a reuptake inhibitor for either transmitter.

  • Escitalopram–the active stereoisomer of citalopram (Celexa) and generic name for Lexapro. Escitalopram is a serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that is conditionally permitted for pilot use by the U.S. FAA.

  • Zolpidem–the generic name for the nonbenzodiazepine sleeping pill sold as Ambien.

  • Zopiclone–the active stereoisomer of zolpidem (Ambien) and generic name for Lunesta.

  • Dominal forte–the German brand name for prothipendyl hydrochloride, a mixed antipsychotic and insomnia drug not available in the U.S. Prothipendyl belongs to the phenothiazines, a class of early antipsychotic drugs that includes chlorpromazine (Thorazine).


READ MORE:  One Dead, One Injured After Police Shoot Men Dressed As Women After Collision At NSA



As Americans search for an answer to the question ‘why’ Paddock did what he did, some people believe investigators need to look further into his own medicine cabinet for a pharmaceutical drug which can take an ordinary person and transform them into a killer. Some experts believe that serotonin-syndrome is what can make an ordinary person suddenly become homicidal. Many believe serotonin-syndrome can be caused by something as simple as starting to take, ceasing, or re-starting anti-depressants.


While much speculation surrounds the motivations behind Paddock’s murderous rampage with legally obtained weapons, the expert on anti-depressant side effects has spent years unraveling the Columbine high school shooting and he believes anti-depressants bear the weight of the burden.



“I’ve been involved in several cases as an expert witness,” Breggin stated to TFTP in a telephone interview. In the Columbine shooting, specifically with, “Eric Harris. I was able to confirm that Harris was taking Luvox right up until the time of the shooting. He had a ‘therapeutic level’ right up to the time of the shooting according to the coroner’s report and in Solvay’s report to the FDA.” (Solvay is the maker of the drug Luvox).


The doctor continued, “I’ve seen both of those reports. Harris had some recent increase in the drug, which is common before things get worse and worse. We know that when he was put on the Luvox there was no evidence that he was violent at that time. But we know that the violence grows over time,” he added.



Dr. Breggin, the world’s foremost expert on anti-depressant induced homicides and suicides also commented on James Holmes’ use of anti-depressants. Holmes is infamously known as the Aurora, Colorado mass murderer. On July, 20, 2012, he killed 12 people, wounding dozens more. Dr. Breggin reflected on Holmes and revealed the inside story behind his murderous rampage.




READ MORE:  BREAKING: Polling Stations on Lockdown After Mass Shooter Kills 1, Injures 3



“When he went to the doctor telling her he had homicidal thoughts and feelings, she put him on Zoloft. It was after he goes on Zoloft that he developed those manic-like psychotic life plans. These drugs (SSRI’s – selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, AKA anti-depressants) can produce psychotic behavior,” the doctor maintained.


“We know that he stopped on June 30th and that he was in his full blown state of psychosis and twenty days later he goes on to conduct the violence.” Stopping short of blaming anti-depressants directly, especially without first confirming Paddock was taking them, Dr. Breggin would go so far as to say, “It appears that drugs are involved in many and many of these cases.”


As detectives, members of the media, and the public, all try and sort out the reasons behind the mayhem, mangling, and murder, Dr. Breggin’s final comments attempted to put it all in perspective. “All I can say is it should be one of the first things we look for.”


One doesn’t have to look far. There’s evidence Paddock was already taking Valium. Dr. Breggin acknowledged as much when he said, “Lo and behold we have some evidence reported from the local press and that it was reported officially in the state’s PMP (Prescription Monitoring Program).” Paddock was taking downers, quite possibly to counter-act the upper affect prescription anti-depressants were having on his mind.


Before it’s all said and done, Paddock’s name may be written alongside Crespi, Lubitz, Harris, and Holmes as murderers, adversely affected by prescription anti-depressants, already known to cause suicidal actions, homicidal ideations, and violent behaviors.




READ MORE:  The Last Words Freddie Gray Ever Read? Baltimore Cops Leave Sadistic Messages Inside Police Vans


Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Newly Unsealed Records Show Dylann Roof was Taking Antidepressants Before Mass Murder

roof



Charleston, SC — Dylann Roof’s mental state was hidden from jurors, according to a November report which concluded Roof suffered from delusions of grandeur and was identified as autistic. Roof was convicted in the killing of nine Black parishioners in 2015 at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston.


Make no mistake, Dylann Roof is a deranged mass murderer who slaughtered innocent people in cold blood. He deserves to die a horrid death. However, as noted below, there is a lot more to this story than what’s on the surface.


The new details about Roof’s mental state were recently unsealed. According to CNN, “The revelations came after US District Judge Richard Gergel unsealed 19 documents from competency hearings that help paint a picture of the 23-year-old’s mental state both as a teen and while he was being held in prison after the church massacre.”


Gergel halted jury selection for his trial in November to allow for a complete competency to stand trial evaluation to be conducted. Following the evaluation, jury selection resumed and in January Roof was found guilty. He was given the death penalty after pleading guilty to a long list of charges. He’s been sentenced to death for the murders of nine innocent people who’d met for Bible study at their church.


Roof reportedly told a defense team physician he’d never be executed because in his words he’d, “be rescued by white nationalists after they took over the government.” The reports go on to say he exhibited, “psychiatric symptoms that are not explained by autism spectrum disorder, including anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, disordered thinking, and psychosis (including delusions of grandeur and somatic delusions).”


Adding to his psychiatric diagnosis, his autism, and his belief he suffered from unexplained illnesses such as thyroid disease (somatic delusions), was the conclusion the mass-murderer was also schizophrenic. “It is my impression that it is too early to predict his psychiatric trajectory…but his symptoms appear to me to be consistent with the schizophrenia spectrum,” Dr. Rachel Loftin wrote.



READ MORE:  Studies Prove Without Doubt That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier



At the time of the killings the crime was largely considered a hate crime, White on Black, leading many politicians, including former President Barack H. Obama to visit the area, express outrage, demand calls for justice, and attend prayer vigils and memorial services.


Obama made the following statement;



The fact that this took place in a black church obviously also raises questions about a dark part of our history. This is not the first time that black churches have been attacked, and we know the hatred across races and faiths pose a particular threat to our democracy and our ideals.



At one point in the aftermath, the former president even sang the song “Amazing Grace” in an apparent attempt to bring healing to a community affected by someone many proclaimed was a racist.



Many mainstream media outlets painted Roof as a cold-hearted racist who hated Black people, even though many of his Black friends denied such characterizations. The George Soros-funded Southern Poverty Law Center even called him a “disaffected white supremacist”.


But now a new picture is emerging of the killer; not one of a racist but, rather, a deranged man who was, according to court documents, autistic, schizophrenic, and suffering from psychosis. Roof, however, wants to be known as a “sociopath” saying to label him as autistic was to equate him with “nerds.” “Nerds and losers have autism. Don’t tell me I have autism,” he told autism expert and William & Mary Professor John Elder Robison.


“I appreciate you coming here, but I don’t need your help. I’m not autistic. There’s nothing wrong with me. The state psychiatrist told me there’s nothing wrong with me. He said I don’t have autism. I’m just a sociopath,” Roof proclaimed to the psychologist.


“I’m going to get pardoned in four or five years. This doesn’t matter. Please don’t come and testify for me. I don’t need or want you here,” he implored.



READ MORE:  Fox News: If You Don"t Vaccinate Your Children, You are a "Communist"



Robison believed strongly Roof was suffering from embarrassment with the thought he might be labeled autistic. He made several observations which led him to believe Roof was truly autistic.


After meeting with Roof on November 5th, he prepared a statement under oath, for Roof’s defense attorneys. Robison detailed why he arrived at his conclusions and the concerns his defense team should have moving forward in his case.


  1. Roof was more interested in the clothes he was going to wear than his own defense at trial. Robinson said this is consistent with how autistic individuals suffer from “extreme sensory sensitivities.” His need to examine each and every article of clothing he would wear at trial, “went far beyond the simple desire to be dressed presentably,” he concluded.

  2. Roof was more concerned with how he appeared than in helping his defense team prepare their case. Robison claimed Roof’s “executive functioning” was affected by his autism.

  3. Roof, like most autistic individuals, had to have a certain daily routine in order to function properly.

  4. Stress from choosing the right patterned clothes was more important to Roof than his very life’s path.

  5. Roof displayed a lack of emotional response to his case, even seeming to want to please the prison guards over meeting with experts for his defense.

  6. Robison was concerned with Roof’s “limited facial expressions,” saying uninformed jurors of his autism may interpret his smiling at inappropriate times as being disconnected emotionally from his actions, something the expert feared would “prejudice them against him.”

Robison’s conclusion was consistent with Roof’s attorney’s requests that he be given special accommodations during his court proceedings.


CNN also detailed the fact Roof was taking antidepressants before the mass murder. As The Free Thought Project has reported on numerous occasions, antidepressants are known to cause suicide and homicides in some individuals.



READ MORE:  Mainstream Media Finally Admits Mass Banker "Suicides" Were Likely a Vast Criminal Conspiracy



While it was known that Roof was abusing suboxone at the time of the murders, the admission of antidepressant use is significant.


Unsealing Roof’s court documents, which revealed not only that he was autistic but was also taking antidepressants, should result in a larger discussion about not only the safety of antidepressants but also a long overdue conversation about the number of mass murderers who were on them.


Suicide, birth defects, heart problems, hostility, violence, aggression, hallucinations, self-harm, delusional thinking, homicidal ideation, and death are just a few of the side effects caused by the medication Roof was reportedly taking.


There have been 150 studies in 17 countries on antidepressant-induced side effects. There have been 134 drug regulatory agency warnings from 11 countries and the EU warning about the dangerous side effects of antidepressants.


Despite this deadly laundry list of potential reactions to these medications, their use has skyrocketed by 400% since 1988. 


Currently, 11 percent of all Americans 12 years of age and over take antidepressant medication, which is a higher rate than all other countries in the world.


There are certainly people of all ages that can benefit from certain prescription medication. However, the most worrisome aspect of Roof’s ties to this medication is that the majority of mass shooters in recent U.S. history have links to these same meds.


Unfortunately, the fact that this deranged individual was on a drug that contributes to thousands of suicides, killings, and now mass murder will be glazed over and barely register as a blip in the media.



Disclaimer: While CNN did provide links to Robison’s documents conferring a diagnosis of autism, they did not provide any links to Roof claiming “White nationalists” would rescue him. The original source material for that allegation cannot be located.