Showing posts with label james o'keefe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label james o'keefe. Show all posts

Friday, January 12, 2018

Twitter Caught Trying To Silence James O’Keefe After He Exposed Their Conservative Censorship Regime

twitter_censorship


Twitter has finally unblocked Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe’s account after attempting to silence the conservative journalist over his expose on the social media giants direct political censorship of conservatives.


Multiple media outlets have noted that before the suspension, O’Keefe had been gaining upwards of 10,000 new followers per day since the release of his bombshell expose that showed Twitter employees literally bragging about censoring conservative viewpoints on the platform.


“The suspension was likely an attempt by Twitter to bury the news story exposing company practices, but Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was ultimately bombarded with over 20,000 tweets demanding he lift O’Keefe’s suspension,” wrote Kit Daniels.


“Twitter is trying to block our journalism,” O’Keefe was also quoted as saying.


Keep in mind this wasn’t some small-scale conservative leaning hit piece against Twitter. O’Keefe’s expose included actual video footage of Twitter engineers admitting it all.


As an article on The Daily Sheeple noted, “In what represents a chokeslam of an exposé, Project Veritas has released undercover video of Twitter engineers admitting that they deliberately censor conservative opinions and are implementing a way of relegating “shitty people” so their content is shadow banned.”


“In the video, current and former Twitter employees confirm virtually everything that conservatives have long suspected about the left-wing company silencing people on the right.”


The company even “shadow bans” certain accounts who still think they are using the platform but their content is actually censored to everyone else.


“One strategy is to shadow ban so you have ultimate control,” former Twitter employee Abhinov Vadrevu can be heard saying in the undercover video. “The idea of a shadow ban is that you ban someone but they don’t know they’ve been banned, because they keep posting and no one sees their content.”


All in all, it is clear that both Twitter and Facebook are absolutely 100% working against conservatives across the internet and will continue to do so until Americans finally demand real change.


When will enough be enough?


Tuesday, November 28, 2017

NEW O"KEEFE: Hidden Cam Captures WaPo Natl Security Reporter Aghast At Anti-Trump Bias

Content originally published at iBankCoin.com


Hours after the Washington Post "busted" Project Veritas for trying to trick the paper into publishing a fake Roy Moore accusation, PV founder James O"Keefe released a new undercover video featuring WaPo National Security reporter Dan Lamothe admitting that, shocker, WaPo reporters "definitely don"t like Trump,"and that the paper"s "institutional voice," or "opinion from God" publishes hit pieces against the President that are so beyond the pale that Lamothe can"t believe he works for the paper:


PV Journalist: "So they just like, rip on him?"


 


Dan Lamothe: "Those have become critical to the point where I"ll read some of them and I"m like whoa! Like I work for this place?



Lamothe - who seems like a nice guy that"s genuinely interested in reporting facts - goes on to say that while journalists cover Trump more fairly ("they also give him credit where there"s credit"), the "institutional voice" of the paper is trying to "educate people but with a point of view." "It"s, like, a very different mission" says the National Security reporter.


Democracy Dies In Bias


When asked about the Washington Post"s bias, Lamothe says that while the paper is "right on the story," they"re "spending a lot of emphasis on this or that," meaning that the Jeff Bezos owned outlet will spend a disproportionate amount of time spotlighting stories which might make President Trump look bad, or what he"s tweeted.


"it sucks so much oxygen out of the room. It"s just so much emphasis on what he said and what he tweeted," Lamothe said, adding "I can"t tell you how many times we get an email at work: "Oh did you see what he (Trump) just tweeted? What are we gonna do about it?"" 


NYT and CNN are worse? 


When asked if reporters at the Washington Post insert individual bias against Trump in their reporting, Lamothe replied "Oh totally, and... I think the Post tries to reign it in a lot. New York Times does it less so. Some of the New York Times reporters are way over the top. CNN is always over the top."


Trump Effect


Another Project Veritas undercover operative recorded Joey Marburger, Director of Product for the Washington Post, admitting that Trump is a primary driver of traffic to the publication.


"If Trump just disappeared tomorrow, our traffic would drop by forty percent. So, yeah, we think about that." -Joey Marburger, WaPo



So what have we learned?


-Most WaPo reporters hate Trump but try to report honestly, according to Dan Lamothe, giving the President "credit where there"s credit"


-WaPo"s "institutional voice," however, is very anti-Trump


-CNN and the New York Times are way worse, according to Lamothe


-Without Trump, WaPo"s traffic would drop by 40%


Watch here: 


 


Follow on Twitter @ZeroPointNow § Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Thursday, October 19, 2017

O'Keefe Drops Part IV: 20-Year NYT Veteran Exposes "Culture Of Anti-Trump Bias"

First it was Audience Strategy Editor, Nick Dudich, who admitted to repeatedly promoting content that intentionally sought to, among other things, damage President Trump"s businesses as a means towards forcing his resignation. 


Next came the NYT"s senior Home Page Editor, Des Shoe, who described Trump as an “oblivious idiot” and Pence as “f***ing horrible” while admitting that her company"s perpetual bias and "shocking" headlines were often nothing more than click-bait designed to attract readers in a hyper-competitive industry.


Now, James O"Keefe and the team at Project Veritas would like for you to meet Todd Gordon, a 20-year veteran IT consultant at the New York Times who says the "culture of anti-Trump bias" has become so pervasive at the Times that not a single person within the organization has a positive opinion of the President.





PV Journalist: “Have you ever had anybody in New York Times’ office come up to you and say, I actually enjoy Trump?”



Todd Gordon: “No, no, no.”



PV Journalist: “Really?”



Todd Gordon: “Not one person.”



PV Journalist: “Not one person?”



Todd Gordon: “Not one, not one. Everyone hates him. They hate him like the plague dude.  I’m like, beautiful day, today. And they’re like, as good as it could be, fuck Trump. Everywhere I go, everywhere I go they’re like as good as it could be, but we’re fucked.”





Gordon goes on to say that without a voice of dissent, it is impossible to believe that The Times can be impartial towards Trump, “They unfairly, yes. I agree 100 percent. They unfairly report on him.”





PV Journalist: “How can they report…”



Todd Gordon: “They can’t.”



PV Journalist: “Without being biased, right?”



Todd Gordon: “You’re right, 100%. 100%.”



He continues to explain how a lack of real sourcing for the Russia story has resulted in a nonstop barrage of "heresay"...something we"ve noted numerous times over the past year..





Todd Gordon: “Right, it’s all been here-say. Maybe he did this, maybe he did that. You’re right, 100%. They haven’t been able to prove it.”



PV Journalist: “But 100%, that’s how I feel like Times…”



Todd Gordon: “You’re right.”



PV Journalist: “…has covered this, right?”



Todd Gordon: “Yeah, 100% you’re right. It’s all heresay.”



PV Journalist: “You’re in the office all the time, so you get to see it firsthand.”



Todd Gordon: “Yeah, heresay, it’s all heresay. And they’re like grab that heresay and let’s put it out there.”





With that intro, here is "NYT Part IV" in its entirety:


Tuesday, October 10, 2017

O'Keefe Strikes Again, Catches NYT Editors On Hidden Camera: "Targeting Trump's Buinesses, His Dumb F**k Of A Son"

In the latest of a series of undercover operations targeting mainstream media bias, James O"Keefe has just dropped a new undercover video which takes direct aim at the New York Times" Audience Strategy Editor, Nick Dudich, who admits repeatedly to promoting content that intentionally seeks to, among other things, damage President Trump"s businesses as a means towards forcing his resignation.


Here is a brief intro from Project Veritas:





While talking about being objective at the Times, Dudich replies candidly, "No I"m not, that"s why I"m here."



Dudich considers himself an important player at the New York Times, telling the Project Veritas Journalist "my voice is on... my imprint is on every video we do."



Dudich goes on to explain what he might do to target President Trump:



"I"d target his businesses, his dumb fuck of a son, Donald Jr., and Eric...



"Target that. Get people to boycott going to his hotels. Boycott... So a lot of the Trump brands, if you can ruin the Trump brand and you put pressure on his business and you start investigating his business and you start shutting it down, or they"re hacking or other things. He cares about his business more than he cares about being President. He would resign. Or he"d lash out and do something incredibly illegal, which he would have to."



When the undercover journalist asks Dudich if he could make sure that the anti-Trump stories make it to the front, he replied, "Oh, we always do."




To our complete "shock", O"Keefe also learned the Dudich worked for Hillary"s 2016 presidential campaign and Obama"s campaign in both 2008 and 2012...





In 2016, he was recruited to work for the Clinton campaign:



"So I have that background, so when Clinton in 2016... they needed a volunteer strategist to do video... well, they needed someone to help them do video, and how to make it heartfelt, for Clinton."



He even had to quit his job in journalism in order to work for the Clinton campaign: "I had to leave my job at Fusion ABC to then take a job at Upworthy where I wasn"t deemed a journalist anymore to be able to work for the Clinton campaign."



Dudich explains how his activism motivated him to re-engage in the news business: "Like, after the Clinton campaign, I"m like, no I need to get back into news and keep doing shit because, like, this isn"t going to change."




Bizarrely, Dudich also claims to have joined the Antifa movement as an undercover agent for the FBI...a request which he originally said came from his godfather, James Comey, even though he subsequently retracted that statement.





Nicholas Dudich also told the undercover journalist bizarre stories about his personal connection to the FBI and his previous excitement as part of Anti-Fa.



"Yeah, I used to be an Anti-Fa punk once upon a time." he told the undercover journalist. "So, I had fun. They"d start s**t, I"m like, I get to hit you. I"m so excited."



He also claims that James Comey, former Director of the FBI, asked him to join Anti-Fa: "I joined that stuff for them [the FBI]. I was an asset... So it was intelligence gathering, seeing if they were [sic], what their agenda was, whether they"re a threat or not."



"How"d you meet Comey?" asked the Project Veritas journalist. "He"s my godfather," Dudich explained. "My dad and mom knew him and his wife for a really long time."



"Well the Comey hearing, I should have recused myself, but I"m not ever telling anybody there [at the Times] that I have a tie with that or else I don"t know if they can keep me on."



With that intro, here is the complete video:




Why do we feel like it"s Dudich whose resignation is imminent as opposed to Trump"s?

Friday, July 7, 2017

CNN's Ratings Collapse As Primetime Shows Draw Less Viewers Than Re-Runs Of "Yogi Bear"

A series of fake news articles (see here, here and here), black mail of anonymous Reddit users who had the audacity to poke fun at them and a couple of undercover videos from Project Veritas revealing CNN producers admitting their own news is "mostly bullshit," seems to be taking a toll on CNN"s ratings.


As The Federalist notes in the table below, for the week of June 26th - July 2nd, CNN"s primetime shows (Anderson Cooper and Don Lemon) managed to draw about 6% fewer viewers than multi-decade old re-runs of "Yogi Bear," "Full House," and "Friends" which air in the same time slots on Nick-At-Nite.


CNN



Sometimes it"s difficult to know for sure, but we think this is a bad trend...


CNN


(Source: AdWeek.com)

Saturday, July 1, 2017

Andrew Cuomo Refuses Federal Data Request Related To Trump's "Voter Fraud Myth"

Shortly after moving into the White House, President Trump promised a "major investigation into VOTER FRAUD" and vowed that any evidence of wrongdoing would be used to strengthen voting procedures.  The following tweets undoubtedly "triggered" millions of liberals across the country as visions of "racist" voter ID laws danced in their heads.





Then, just last month, that "major investigation" came in the form of an Executive Order entitled: "Presidential Executive Order on the Establishment of Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity."  The Commission was to be chaired by Vice President Mike Pence and it"s mission was defined as follows:





The Commission shall, consistent with applicable law, study the registration and voting processes used in Federal elections.  The Commission shall be solely advisory and shall submit a report to the President that identifies the following:



(a)  those laws, rules, policies, activities, strategies, and practices that enhance the American people"s confidence in the integrity of the voting processes used in Federal elections;



(b)  those laws, rules, policies, activities, strategies, and practices that undermine the American people"s confidence in the integrity of the voting processes used in Federal elections; and



(c)  those vulnerabilities in voting systems and practices used for Federal elections that could lead to improper voter registrations and improper voting, including fraudulent voter registrations and fraudulent voting.




And, since no one would possibly argue in favor of more voter fraud rather than less, you might assume this particular Executive Order enjoyed overwhelming bipartisan support across the country...of course, you could think that, but you would be incredibly wrong.


Enter New York Governor Andrew Cuomo.  Apparently Mr. Cuomo is so certain that voter fraud is nothing more than a right-wing "myth" that"s he unwilling to even comply with a data request to make sure.  We"re sure he"s just trying to save Vice President Pence from wasting his time.




Of course, Cuomo"s position is somewhat curious in light of the fact that New York City"s own Commissioner of the Board of Elections, Alan Schulkin (Democrat), was caught on a secret video by Project Veritas openly admitting that "there is a lot of voter fraud."  At one point, Schulkin even admits that campaign officials bus minorities from "poll site to poll site" so they can vote multiple times.





“He gave out ID cards, de Blasio. That’s in lieu of a driver’s license, but you can use it for anything.  But they didn’t vet people to see who they really are. Anybody can go in there and say, ‘I am Joe Smith, I want an ID card."



"It’s absurd. There is a lot of fraud. Not just voter fraud, all kinds of fraud . . . This is why I get more conservative as I get older.”



“Voters? Yeah, they should ask for your ID. I think there is a lot of voter fraud.  You know, I don’t think it’s too much to ask somebody to show some kind of an ID . . . You go into a building, you have to show them your ID."



“They bus people around to vote . . . They put them in a bus and go poll site to poll site.”  Asked which neighborhoods, Schulkin said, “I don’t want to say.”  When the undercover mentions black and Hispanic neighborhoods, Schulkin responded, “Yeah . . . and Chinese, too.”





Alas, we assume that video is also just a "myth"...


Of course, New York wasn"t the only snowflake state to opt out of Trump"s voter fraud data request. Apparently California is also quite confident that all of their illegal immigrants are voting legally...or something like that.




As The Hill notes, a total of 5 states have refused to turn over any voter data whatsoever while another 9 have said they"ll only hand over publicly available data.





As of Friday afternoon, officials in New York, California, Massachusetts, Kentucky and Virginia had said they would not turn over any of their voter data to the voter fraud commission.



Other officials in Connecticut, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Vermont, Utah, North Carolina, Indiana and Iowa said they would only turn over public information on voter rolls, but wouldn"t share private information.



Wisconsin announced it would turn over public information but would charge the commission $12,500 to buy the voter roll data.



Of course, at the end of the day, you only really need to examine a couple of critical swing states to get a sense for how rampant voter fraud might be.  And, since we don"t see Florida or Ohio on the lists above, we very much look forward to the data from those two states.

Friday, June 30, 2017

American Pravda Part III: CNN – Project Veritas




Stewart Rhodes, Army Airborne Veteran, Yale Law School Graduate, OK Founder and President


Sheriff Richard Mack, Former Sheriff of Graham County, Arizona


John D. Shirley, Retired Duty Peace Officer - Houston, TX. National Lead Liaison to Peace Officers.


Jay Stang, Veteran US Marine Corps - Texas Chapter President


Jim Ayala, EMT Veteran, Oath Keepers Treasurer, Merchandise


Sgt. Maj. Joseph Santoro, Retired Army, infantry, EOD. OK National Operations NOC


Michele Imburgia, Texas State VP


Sheriff Denny Peyman, Retired Jackson County, KY Sheriff, OK National Peace Officer Liaison


John Kerriman, Current Missouri police academy instructor, police veteran, OK National Peace Officer/LEO Liaison




Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Project Veritas Exposes CNN's Van Jones: "The Russia Thing Is Just A Big Nothing Burger"

Yesterday, after dropping his first undercover CNN bombshell, which starred producer John Bonifield admitting that CNN"s endless "Russian meddling" crusade was "mostly bullshit" directed by the network"s CEO Jeff Zucker with the sole intent of spiking ratings, Project Veritas" James O"Keefe promised there was more to come.  And, all we knew was that the subject of the second video would be "someone we all knew..."


As it turns out, that "someone" is none other than CNN"s Van Jones who inadvertently got caught revealing his true thoughts on CNN"s "Russian meddling" narrative, namely that the whole story is a "big nothing burger."





PV Reporter:  "What do you think is going to happen this week with the whole Russia thing?"



Van Jones:  "The Russia Thing Is Just A Big Nothing Burger"



PV Reporter:  "Really?"



Van Jones:  "Yeah."



Here is the full Van Jones footage for your viewing pleasure:




Finally, here is yesterday"s video for those who missed it:


Friday, February 24, 2017

O'Keefe Drops "Bombshell" Undercover Footage From Within CNN

As promised two days ago on the Sean Hannity radio show, James O"Keefe and his team at Project Veritas just released covertly captured, previously unheard audio footage from within the CNN newsroom.  But unlike his usual undercover sting operations, this footage was allegedly sourced from a CNN insider who apparently grew frustrated with the perpetually biased reporting of the "fake news" media outlet.


Per O"Keefe"s website, today"s release includes 119 hours of secretly recorded raw footage from an inside source at CNN with another 100 hours of footage still to be released.  Given the volume of footage to be released, O"Keefe is asking for help to transcribe and investigate the recordings and encourages users to provide tips on interesting discoveries here.





The audio was secretly recorded in 2009 by an anonymous source inside CNN’s Atlanta headquarters who we are identifying as Miss X. The tapes contain soundbites from current and previous CNN employees Joe Sterling, Arthur Brice, and Nicky Robertson, as well as numerous others. 



In order to expose media malfeasance within CNN, we need your help transcribing, investigating and connecting the dots on these 200+ hours of audio. Leave comments, upload transcriptions or contact us with your tips below.





Among other things, the audio recordings reveal CNN attempting to misrepresent polling data...





Miss X: "I read a CNN poll that was taken on June 26 and 28th, and I know that the hearing for the case, the fire fighters case was on the 29th, so the poll was done right before it, and those are still the poll results we"re reporting, so I asked someone in DC who does the poll results about why we hadn"t updated it, and said there were a few newer polls from last week and the week before and there"s CBS news polls and a Rasmussen poll, and he said we don"t use Rasmussen, and I said does CNN plan to do another poll if we"re only using that. He said we"re not going to be doing another poll, those are the results we"ll be using. So I don"t see how that"s reporting all sides because that poll said hold for release until Friday the 10th."



Arthur Brice: "Who did you talk with?"



Miss X: "Paul [CNN"s Deputy Political Director Paul Steinhauser]."



Arthur Brice: "Yeah, he"s your director. Yeah, he"s pretty high up in the food chain. I agree. I think it"s dishonest to use outdated information if new information shows something that is in variance with what you"re reporting. It"s just, it"s dishonest."



...and again with polling data related to Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor:





Miss X: "This wasn"t released until two weeks after. So can we say a newly released poll?"



Joe Sterling: "No, you can"t say that. You can"t say that at all. This isn"t a newly released."



Miss X: "But it says newly released on Friday."



Joe Sterling: "I know, how did we write about this? Did we write a wire about this? "I don"t think we stand to change how people think of her [Sotomayor]. Geez, I mean if someone picked this up it"s not going to change - it"s not going to change anybody"s opinion."



And, admitting what we all knew already, here is CNN"s former News Desk Editor, Joe Sterling, revealing his clear bias for Obama.




With that brief intro, here is O"Keefe"s latest work.




The full 119 hours of audio footage will eventually be available here, but for now PV"s servers seem to be having a difficult time keeping up with the overwhelming demand from supporters eager to hear first-hand accounts of CNN"s bias.


Meanwhile, noting that this is just the "beginning of the end for the MSM", O"Keefe also announced that he will pay a $10,000 award to anyone who comes forward with legally obtained audio or video footage exposing media malfeasance.







And apparently President Trump has now weighed in on O"Keefe"s latest project.


Thursday, February 23, 2017

‘Beginning of the End’: Leaked Secret Recordings Expose Truth About CNN




(ZHEAs promised two days ago on the Sean Hannity radio show, James O’Keefe and his team at Project Veritas just released covertly captured, previously unheard audio footage from within the CNN newsroom. But unlike his usual undercover sting operations, this footage was allegedly sourced from a CNN insider who apparently grew frustrated with the perpetually biased reporting of the “fake news” media outlet.


Per O’Keefe’s website, today’s release includes 119 hours of secretly recorded raw footage from an inside source at CNN with another 100 hours of footage still to be released. Given the volume of footage to be released, O’Keefe is asking for help to transcribe and investigate the recordings and encourages users to provide tips on interesting discoveries here.







“The audio was secretly recorded in 2009 by an anonymous source inside CNN’s Atlanta headquarters who we are identifying as Miss X. The tapes contain soundbites from current and previous CNN employees Joe Sterling, Arthur Brice, and Nicky Robertson, as well as numerous others. 




We"re revolutionizing the news industry, but we need your help! Click here to get started.




“In order to expose media malfeasance within CNN, we need your help transcribing, investigating and connecting the dots on these 200+ hours of audio. Leave comments, upload transcriptions or contact us with your tips below.”



Among other things, the audio recordings reveal CNN attempting to misrepresent polling data…


Miss X: “I read a CNN poll that was taken on June 26 and 28th, and I know that the hearing for the case, the fire fighters case was on the 29th, so the poll was done right before it, and those are still the poll results we’re reporting, so I asked someone in DC who does the poll results about why we hadn’t updated it, and said there were a few newer polls from last week and the week before and there’s CBS news polls and a Rasmussen poll, and he said we don’t use Rasmussen, and I said does CNN plan to do another poll if we’re only using that. He said we’re not going to be doing another poll, those are the results we’ll be using. So I don’t see how that’s reporting all sides because that poll said hold for release until Friday the 10th.”


Arthur Brice: “Who did you talk with?”


Miss X: “Paul [CNN’s Deputy Political Director Paul Steinhauser].”


Arthur Brice: “Yeah, he’s your director. Yeah, he’s pretty high up in the food chain. I agree. I think it’s dishonest to use outdated information if new information shows something that is in variance with what you’re reporting. It’s just, it’s dishonest.”


…and again with polling data related to Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor:


Miss X: “This wasn’t released until two weeks after. So can we say a newly released poll?”


Joe Sterling: “No, you can’t say that. You can’t say that at all. This isn’t a newly released.”


Miss X: “But it says newly released on Friday.”


Joe Sterling: “I know, how did we write about this? Did we write a wire about this? “I don’t think we stand to change how people think of her [Sotomayor]. Geez, I mean if someone picked this up it’s not going to change – it’s not going to change anybody’s opinion.”


And, admitting what we all knew already, here is CNN’s former News Desk Editor, Joe Sterling, revealing his clear bias for Obama.



With that brief intro, here is O’Keefe’s latest work.



The full 119 hours of audio footage will eventually be available here, but for now PV’s servers seem to be having a difficult time keeping up with the overwhelming demand from supporters eager to hear first-hand accounts of CNN’s bias.


Meanwhile, noting that this is just the “beginning of the end for the MSM,” O’Keefe also announced that he will pay a $10,000 award to anyone who comes forward with legally obtained audio or video footage exposing media malfeasance.










By Tyler Durden / Republished with permission / Zero Hedge / Report a typo

Project Veritas Sets Its Sights on "Very Fake News" CNN, The Alt Media Strikes Back

Interested in precious metals investing? Email us HERE 


 






Written by Nathan McDonald (CLICK HERE FOR ORIGINAL)






Get the popcorn ready. You"re about to witness some amazing fireworks that could possibly change the course of history and send the lying, dying Mainstream Media into retreat, licking their wounds as they attempt to recover from the damage they are about to receive.




Project Veritas, led by James O"Keefe, and who is most notably known for "stings" on corrupt organizations, has set his targets on the Mainstream Media in 2017 and his first victim has just been announced: CNN.




This comes as no surprise, as CNN has been attacking the Alternative Media ever since Donald Trump surprised so many and won the election. They have attempted to label James O"Keefe and many other prominent Alt Media sources as "fake news", a campaign that has since horribly backfired in their faces.




In fact CNN was just recently upgraded from "fake news" to "very fake news" by President Trump in a recent press conference, where he proceeded to eviscerate the MSM for their smear campaign against him.




O"Keefe has stated that he has "hundreds of hours" of raw footage and voice audio from within CNN, leaked by an employee who is obviously greatly displeased with his employer and the stance that they have taken in the journalist world.




What exactly does O"Keefe have on CNN? Well, to find out the full story, we are simply going to have to wait and see, as they plan on releasing the information in a Wikileaks style format, slow dripping the information out to the public so that this massive amount of information can properly be digested and consumed.




Either way, if the past is any indication of what is to come, then the information is going to be crippling to CNN, as all past leaks released by Project Veritas have blown the subject of their focus out of the water.




So get your popcorn ready, melt the butter, sprinkle a little salt and pepper on top and enjoy the show. History is about to be made.





Questions or comments about this article? Leave your thoughts HERE.







Written by Nathan McDonald (CLICK HERE FOR ORIGINAL)

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Is James O'Keefe About To Smoke CNN? Tells Hannity He's Set To Release "Hundreds of Hours" Of Newsroom Footage "Wikileaks Style"


James O"Keefe of Project Veritas is set to unleash holy hell Thursday on #FakeNews network CNN. Well, he didn"t exactly say it was CNN, but it was heavily implied. Apparently the network has a mole...


O"Keefe is known for undercover sting operations which have led to such bombshells as the DNC"s paid agitator network, the outing of "DisruptJ20" / Antifa organizers which took place comet ping pong - and netted three arrests (including a suspected pedophile), and most recently New Hampshire election fraud.


Today O"Keefe was interviewed on Sean Hannity"s radio show where he revealed that a major network has been "stung"





O"Keefe: In the next 48 hours, Project Veritas, like Wikileaks, will be releasing hundreds of hours of tape from within the establishment media. Our next target is in fact, the media.



Hannity: How long have you been working on this?



O"Keefe: We"ve had people on the inside come to us. Just like Julian Assange has people come to him, we"ve had people, sources come to us and give us information, and we"re going to be releasing it "Wikileaks Style" this week.



Moments later:





Hannity: Can you give us a hint what organizations are going to be impacted by this?



O"Keefe: It"s one that Trump has really been talking about, you can probably use your imagination.



Hannity: So, it"s CNN...



Listen here:



In other words, a closeted Trump supporter working deep inside hyper-liberal CNN just gave O"Keefe a ton of behind the scenes footage of "The Most Trusted Name In News." My guess is we"re about to hear a bunch of establishment media puppets revealing their extreme hatred for the sitting President of the United States.


Remember that time CNN employees were laughing about Trump"s plane crashing? If O"Keefe"s release is anything along these lines, popcorn sales are about to go through the roof...


Wednesday, January 18, 2017

As Project Veritas Exposes “DisruptJ20” Plot To Cause Inauguration Chaos, Deplorables Out Organizer As Potential #PizzaGate Pedo


Earlier today, investigative journalist James O"Keefe of Project Veritas released his second undercover exposé of the "DC Anti-facist Coalition," which is using hashtag #DisruptJ20 in their plot to disrupt the Inauguration and related events. After successfully infiltrating the anarchist Democrat movement, O"Keefe"s team recorded "DisruptJ20" organizers Luke Kuhn and Colin Dunn at the infamous Comet Ping Pong pizza restaurant in Washington DC, where they divulged their plot to release butyric acid at the "Deploraball" Inauguration party. According to event organizer Mike Cernovich, the FBI has been notified. Interesting side-note; after the Veritas video was released yetserday, nimble navigators assembled what appears to be rock solid evidence linking "Disrupt" organizer Luke Kuhn to the whole #PizzaGate controversy - but I"ll get to that in a minute, or just scroll down. Back to the Veritas releases:





The meeting, captured on hidden camera, was held at Comet Ping Pong, a DC pizza restaurant that is better known as the location of the Pizzagate controversy,” Project Veritas said. “The coalition members discuss the steps they would need to take to halt the Deploraball event." -Project Veritas



See the full first O"Keefe video here which details plans by democrat agitators to gas their enemies at an event (released 1/16/2017):



 





 



In today"s release, as ZeroHedge reports, O"Keefe"s team reveals DisruptJ20 plans to "shut down the city, at like, mid-inauguration." 








"So simultaneous to the checkpoint blockades in the morning, we are also doing a series of clusterfuck blockades, where we are going to try to blockade all the major ingress points in the city."


"Which include, they can include shutting down major bridges and highway access points as well as shutting down metro rail.  So to do that we are going to try to break into several teams kind of like the checkpoints."


"So fears in doing that, we don"t think these are going to be necessarily arrestable actions but there is a possibility you could be; so keep that in mind if you want to participate."


"I CAN CALL MY COMRADE RIGHT NOW"







 



NOW it gets even more interesting...


As soon as the Veritas video hit yesterday, nimble navigators on Reddit and 4chan found solid evidence suggesting DisruptJ20 organizer Luke Kuhn is a pedophile. As investigative journalist William Craddick of Disobedient Media reported earlier, Kuhn made several pedophilic posts to usenet internet groups. One is a defense of sex with young boys "Yes, I did post a few articles to Boychat," and in the other post, Kuhn envisions a child raping Ronald McDonald as a more effective deterrent than E-coli in dissuading children from eating McDonald"s. [click to enlarge]


kidsclown


luke1


And it seems that in 1998, the "Utopian Anarchist Party" which Kuhn was a big part of began to distance themselves after Kuhn"s posts in "chickie-hawk/kid-porn scene" forums. Apparently even liberal anarchists have boundaries.





 



"DC Indymedia editor Luke Kuhn and Bill White were partners in the UAP from 1996 to 2000. Both were identified as "occasional neo-Nazis" in 1998 for their tactics which included encouraging people to bomb public schools, supporting school shootings, publishing the phone numbers and addresses of private citizens to harass them (which is still a favored Luke Kuhn tactic), and their persistent appeals to young children to run away with them, while Luke Kuhn was advocating that it should be legal for adults to have sex with children."






And from Redditor talmichael:




His full name is Paul Luke Kuhn:


Here are 1998 Archive.org links to Kuhn"s "Runaway Railroad," his outreach to children who wish to run away from home. Not sure if he is still doing this. He includes all kinds of terrifying tips for minors so that no one finds them, including: Disguise: Cut it short or shave it -- better to grow long, but hard to do Dye your hair -- natural colors; not obviously dyed Grow a beard or shave -- confounds verbal descriptions Change clothing style/appearance -- easiest big change http://web.archive.org/web/19980626090853/ http://www.overthrow.com/ http://web.archive.org/web/19980626091533/ http://www.overthrow.com/runrules.html This quote from a 1995 Washington Post article indicates Kuhn"s first name is actually Paul, and that he lived in Rockville at that time. Kuhn was known for going shirtless so I assume it"s the same person: Across the city, the curfew sparked a variety of reactions from the citizenry. When the clock atop the Riggs Bank in Georgetown struck midnight, Paul "Luke" Kuhn was parading down M Street, wearing brown shorts with no shirt and carrying a yellow placard that read "Expletive the curfew." Kuhn, 29, of Rockville, called the curfew "the number one assault on our civil rights. This curfew is Pearl Harbor." He said he and other opponents planned further demonstrations against the curfew. "The cops don"t like it. It"s ridiculous," he said. "They"re being asked to hunt curfew violators when they could be hunting murderers." In any event, few underage teenagers were in evidence on the streets of Georgetown after midnight. "We don"t have a lot of problems with teens in this area," said Lt. Emmojean Simpson-Jones, shift supervisor in Georgetown. http://archive.is/4S8sy


Then, a picture began floating around ostensibly featuring Kuhn in a now famous #PizzaGate instagram picture in which the owner of Comet Ping Pong James Alefantis (ex-lover of CTR mastermind David Brock) talks about tunnels like he"s an expert:





kuhn


Is this Luke Kuhn?


atfirst


suspectedpedo


Turns out that no, the guy in the Instagram picture is believed to be another #PizzaGate player linked to Alefantis; John Kreher. Here he is in the same sweater:


krehera 


He"s also got some creepy Facebook pictures of a guy holding a child, one of which is captioned "Y"all ever miss someone?" Who"s missing?


wha2


misssomeoon1


I wonder if it"s this little girl?


same


So, to review there are two different Comet Pizza-linked suspected pedos; one of whom, Luke Kuhn, is planning on disrupting the Inauguration as an organizer of DisruptJ20, and the other one, John Kreher, is under "active and aggressive" investigation by Voat and 4chan. Both Kuhn and Kreher might be totally innocent, but my spidey senses suggest otherwise. It will be interesting to see where this goes.

Monday, January 16, 2017

Radical Left Group Plot Violence at Trump Inauguration: “Chemical Attack With Butyric Acid”


trump-notmypresident


Will there be widespread riots and less-than-peaceful protest on January 20th? If the statements caught on tape are any indication, there could be something much bigger going on… things could even spiral out of control.


Riot cops and martial law contingencies are standing by, as the deep divisions in our society will be tested once again as the bipolar love him/hate him crowds deal with the next president, and the end of the Obama era. Will there be a spark, or a trigger for outright civil unrest? Maybe not, but it seems that the scene has been set.


Undercover counter-provacateur James O’Keefe staged yet another video investigation via Project Veritas and exposed one of the radical left’s plans to disrupt the inauguration, and use violence and criminal terrorists activities to stop or counter the presidency of Donald Trump.


In a tactic that sounds like something from the days of the terrorist group the Weather Underground, a member of an anti-fascist coalition group was recorded discussing a plan to release butyric acid through a ventilation system and expose pro-Trump crowds to a dangerous gas, while triggering a shutdown of the building and a cancellation of the event.


Here’s the video:


Part I: Hidden-camera Investigation Uncovers Groups Plotting Violence at Trump Inauguration


via Project Veritas:



Project Veritas has just released a new video which uncovers a group known as the DC Anti-Fascist Coalition actively plotting criminal activities to disrupt President-Elect Donald Trump’s inauguration.  These activities likely violate multiple criminal laws.


A Project Veritas journalist was invited by email to a DC Anti-Fascist Coalition meeting, which took place at a residence in Washington D.C. The discussion centered around disrupting the “Deploraball”, a large pro-Trump event at the National Press Club in D.C. scheduled the night before the inauguration.


“It would be really something if we could stop them from having the Deploraball at all,” one activist says in the video.


[…]


“If you had a pint of butyric acid, I don’t care how big the building is, it is closing…” says Luke Kuhm. “And this stuff is like very efficient, it’s very very smelly and it lasts a long time.  A little bit goes a long way,” Scott Green explained.


[…]


Besides using butyric acid, the group considered activating sprinklers or setting off fire alarms in hopes of forcing the guests outside of the building where they would be confronted by protesters.



If this is any indication, then these groups are willing to go pretty far over the line of peaceful protest and legal conduct, and are in fact willing to target Donald Trump supporters, not just the politicians and policies of his administration.


These activities may not be linked, but bear resemblance the spirit of hatred from the left. A black mob was caught on tape just after the election beating up a random white driver without provocation whom they accused of voting for Trump. Paid protests groups are being sent in drove to Washington, D.C. to stir up opposition on January 20th, and could start riots in other cities. Denied the presidency of Hillary Clinton, these sponsored-protest movements will have little else to do than engineer violence, chaos and a crackdown.


As this sentiment continues to spread, America appears poised to devolve into rival gangs and violent political factions, increasingly willing to abandon the rules and pursue mob justice with violent actions and demands. Inner-city hate will breed with ignorant media bias in news coverage of Trump and his supporters, and the pressure between these groups could teeter on the edge of outright war in the streets.


Stay far away from this non-sense, and never turn your back on a radical without his head screwed on in the right direction.


Read more:


Paid Protesters “Planning to Cause Chaos In DC” And Block Peaceful Inauguration for Trump


Trump Voter Beaten By Black Mob: “You Voted Trump. You Gonna Pay For That Sh*t”


Is This The Coup In America? “U.S. Troops On Russian Border” To Start War Before Inauguration


“Timing Is Extremely Unusual”: D.C. National Guard Chief Must Stand Down During Inauguration


Insane, Violent Liberals Fantasize About Inauguration Purge: “A Murderous Bloodbath On the 20th”?



Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.

Advanced Tactical Gas Mask

Please Spread The Word And Share This Post






Author: Mac Slavo
Views: Read by 641 people
Date: January 16th, 2017
Website: www.SHTFplan.com


Copyright Information: Copyright SHTFplan and Mac Slavo. This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.shtfplan.com. Please contact us for permission to reproduce this content in other media formats.


Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Latest Undercover Video “Personally Implicates Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile” In Voter Fraud

Voter Fraud Billboard


This article was written by Tyler Durden and originally published at Zero Hedge.


Editor’s Comment: The basic question, once you get to the point, is: does Hillary get to steal the election, even when it’s out in the open theft? These undercover videos make it pretty clear that we aren’t just dealing with the implications of fraud, but direct evidence of it. Anyway you look at it, there is some major vote rigging going on here.


So then what? If nobody stops her, then what does that tell you about the system that is allowing this to take place, and widely endorsing her – even across two-party lines. The mask is off, and there is a bigger beast to deal with than just Big H.


“Don’t Repeat That To Anybody” – Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile Personally Implicated In Latest Project Veritas Video


by Tyler Durden


Last week, Jame O’keefe and Project Veritas Action potentially altered the course of the U.S. election, or at a minimum raised serious doubts about the practices of the Clinton campaign and the DNC, after releasing two undercover videos that revealed efforts of democrat operatives to incite violence at republican rallies and commit “mass voter fraud.”  While democrats have vehemently denied the authenticity of the videos, two democratic operatives, Robert Creamer and Scott Foval, have both been forced to resign over the allegations.


Many democrats made the rounds on various mainstream media outlets over the weekend in an attempt to debunk the Project Veritas videos.  Unfortunately for them, O’Keefe fired back with warnings that part 3 of his multi-part series was forthcoming and would implicate Hillary Clinton directly.




Now, we have the 3rd installment of O’Keefe’s videos which does seemingly reveal direct coordination between Hillary Clinton, Donna Brazile, Robert Creamer and Scott Foval to organize a smear campaign over Trump’s failure to release his tax returns.  Per Project Veritas:



Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations.In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.” It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: “Don’t repeat that to anybody.”



Within the video both Clinton and Brazile are directly implicated by Creamer during the following exchange:



“The duck has to be an Americans United for Change entity.  This had to do only with some problem between Donna Brazile and ABC, which is owned by Disney, because they were worried about a trademark issue.  That’s why.  It’s really silly.


We originally launched this duck because Hillary Clinton wants the duck.


In any case, so she really wanted this duck figure out there doing this stuff, so that was fine.  So, we put all these ducks out there and got a lot of coverage.  And Trump taxes.  And then ABC/Disney went crazy because they thought our original slogan was ‘Donald ducks his taxes, releasing his tax returns.”


They said it was a trademark issue.  It’s not, but anyway, Donna Brazile had a connection with them and she didn’t want to get sued.  So we switched the ownership of the duck to Americans United for Change and now our signs say ‘Trump ducks releasing his tax returns.’  And we haven’t had anymore trouble.”



As Project Veritas points out, this direct coordination between Clinton, Brazile and Americans United For Change is a violation of federal election laws:



“The ducks on the ground are likely ‘public communications’ for purposes of the law.  It’s political activity opposing Trump, paid for by Americans United For Change funds but controlled by Clinton/her campaign.”



Here is the full video just released:



As a reminder, below are parts 1 & 2 of the Project Veritas series in case you missed them.


Video 1 revealed DNC efforts to incite violence at Trump rallies:



Video 2 provided the democrat playbook on how to commit “mass voter fraud”:



This article was written by Tyler Durden and originally published at Zero Hedge.