Showing posts with label undercover. Show all posts
Showing posts with label undercover. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Reporters sue feds for info on FBI’s infiltration with fake film crew – Bunkerville



The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed a lawsuit Monday against the Justice Department and FBI in an effort to pry loose documents related to the FBI’s prior impersonation of documentary filmmakers.




The FBI has admitted to sending undercover agents to Nevada in 2014 to act as a film crew and interview supporters of rancher Cliven Bundy amid an armed standoff with the federal government.




Footage shot for the fake documentary was later used by the government during criminal trials of some of those involved in the standoff.



The reporter’s committee sought through Freedom of Information Act requests to obtain FBI records regarding the bogus film crew as well as any records on the bureau’s use of the tactic dating back to 2010. The lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia comes after the committee said the FBI has failed to act on the FOIA requests.


FBI agents pretended to work for a bogus film company, Longbow Productions, to gain access to and interview Mr. Bundy and others who aided him during the standoff. The agents created a website, business cards and other credentials to make Longbow Productions look like an authentic company.


“The FBI’s impersonation of journalists and documentary filmmakers undermines the credibility and independence of those who are trying to report on matters of importance to the public,” said Katie Townsend, litigation director for the committee.


“The public deserves to know more about the FBI’s use of this tactic, and has a right to this information under the law, but the FBI seems determined to evade disclosure. We’re asking the court to step in and compel the agency to release these records,” she said.




Read more at the Washington Times

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

14-Year Veteran Undercover Cop Exposes Truth About The Drug War: "I Used To Believe I Was Doing Good"

Authored by Carey Wedler via TheAntiMedia.org,



Yet another police officer is speaking out against the drug war, this time in the United Kingdom. Former officer Neil Woods worked as an undercover drug cop for 14 years, infiltrating some of the most violent gangs in Britain only to learn his tactics were worsening the drug epidemic. Now, he advocates ending the drug war and decriminalizing drugs as he admits his own role in fueling violence and the proliferation of narcotics.



Woods recently spoke with the Independent to make his case and recount the struggles he faced enforcing the British government’s drug war. He was first enlisted by the Home Office to tackle the crack cocaine epidemic in the early 1990s, an effort that apparently ‘pleased the crown.’


Woods says the tactics he helped develop only exacerbated drug-related crime.





“The first place I was posted was in Derby and it wasn’t actually that difficult,” he says. “There were some proper gangsters selling crack and heroin but they weren’t used to the tactic, so although it was a bit scary it wasn’t tremendously difficult because they weren’t expecting it.”



By bringing in new police tactics, however, the dynamics started to change because, as he says, “the thing the about undercover work is that it doesn’t take long for criminals to learn the tactics.”


Woods recounted several close-call experiences, including one where he was forced to consume amphetamines to prove his credibility. In another, a dealer could sense Woods was a cop and repeatedly pressed him on it before he used intimidation tactics to neutralize the situation.  Though he escaped unscathed, he often put his life on the line only to find his work was futile.





“The ultimate defence against the development of police tactics is an increased use of violence to intimidate the community in which undercover police officers move,” he explained, describing the effects of government efforts to curb drug use.



As the drug war raged on, drug gangs became even more extreme, and Woods began to realize he wasn’t helping.





“I knew that I couldn’t win early on,” he told the Independent. “But I kept being tempted back into it because I was good at my job. The police departments would say ‘Woodsy, we need you. These gangsters are even nastier that the other ones. They’re burning people to death. They’re using rape as a weapon.”



Ultimately, however, he accepted his inability to make a difference as a cop.





“[I]t was because of me that organised crime was getting nasty. I was developing the tactics. I put dealers in prison for over 1000 years and I only disrupted the heroin supply for two hours. Policing can’t affect the demand so policing drugs is completely futile. I can’t emphasise that enough. More people die and it gets more violent. Drugs have got stronger and cheaper and more varied since the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.”



He also described his experience getting to know drug addicts as he worked undercover. Asked what the biggest misconception about them is, he explained:





“When I went into policing I thought addicts had made the mistake of trying drugs and had no willpower to stop. Actually, problematic drug users – or at least all the ones I knew – were self medicating. Most of the heroin users I knew were self-medicating for childhood trauma, whether physical or sexual. As an undercover officer I spent a great deal of time getting to know these people. The more I knew someone the more I could manipulate them. They’re like puppets. And they trusted me and saw me as a peer.”



Describing one female victim of childhood sexual abuse, he explained, “To the law, she’s a criminal to the law and I as an agent of the state was there to capture people like that. But they were caught in the crossfire between the police and gangs.”


Though Woods doesn’t advocate a “free for all” on drugs, he does believe the war on them must end. “The answer is to regulate drugs and take the power away from organised crime,” he argues. “The illicit drugs market is worth £7billion a year. Our communities are ruined by organised crime intimidating populations to protect themselves so we need to regulate the drug supply like we do with alcohol.”


He cites Switzerland’s establishment of controlled heroin injection centers in the 1990s as an example, an approach recently adopted in Canada, as well. He also cites Portugal, which has had great success with his policy of decriminalization.


Woods seeks to live by his principles to undo the damage he helped inflict on drug-riddled communities by speaking out against past failed policies.


Woods launched the U.K. version of  Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), an organization of officers who advocate against the war on drugs. There is also an American LEAP that works toward the same goal.





“…I used to risk my life doing the work because I used to believe I was doing good,” he says.



“Now I realise everything I did only caused harm. Now, I feel duty bound to continue taking risks because it’s a matter of principle.”


Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Latest Undercover Video “Personally Implicates Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile” In Voter Fraud

Voter Fraud Billboard


This article was written by Tyler Durden and originally published at Zero Hedge.


Editor’s Comment: The basic question, once you get to the point, is: does Hillary get to steal the election, even when it’s out in the open theft? These undercover videos make it pretty clear that we aren’t just dealing with the implications of fraud, but direct evidence of it. Anyway you look at it, there is some major vote rigging going on here.


So then what? If nobody stops her, then what does that tell you about the system that is allowing this to take place, and widely endorsing her – even across two-party lines. The mask is off, and there is a bigger beast to deal with than just Big H.


“Don’t Repeat That To Anybody” – Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile Personally Implicated In Latest Project Veritas Video


by Tyler Durden


Last week, Jame O’keefe and Project Veritas Action potentially altered the course of the U.S. election, or at a minimum raised serious doubts about the practices of the Clinton campaign and the DNC, after releasing two undercover videos that revealed efforts of democrat operatives to incite violence at republican rallies and commit “mass voter fraud.”  While democrats have vehemently denied the authenticity of the videos, two democratic operatives, Robert Creamer and Scott Foval, have both been forced to resign over the allegations.


Many democrats made the rounds on various mainstream media outlets over the weekend in an attempt to debunk the Project Veritas videos.  Unfortunately for them, O’Keefe fired back with warnings that part 3 of his multi-part series was forthcoming and would implicate Hillary Clinton directly.




Now, we have the 3rd installment of O’Keefe’s videos which does seemingly reveal direct coordination between Hillary Clinton, Donna Brazile, Robert Creamer and Scott Foval to organize a smear campaign over Trump’s failure to release his tax returns.  Per Project Veritas:



Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations. “In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.” It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: “Don’t repeat that to anybody.”



Within the video both Clinton and Brazile are directly implicated by Creamer during the following exchange:



“The duck has to be an Americans United for Change entity.  This had to do only with some problem between Donna Brazile and ABC, which is owned by Disney, because they were worried about a trademark issue.  That’s why.  It’s really silly.


We originally launched this duck because Hillary Clinton wants the duck.


In any case, so she really wanted this duck figure out there doing this stuff, so that was fine.  So, we put all these ducks out there and got a lot of coverage.  And Trump taxes.  And then ABC/Disney went crazy because they thought our original slogan was ‘Donald ducks his taxes, releasing his tax returns.”


They said it was a trademark issue.  It’s not, but anyway, Donna Brazile had a connection with them and she didn’t want to get sued.  So we switched the ownership of the duck to Americans United for Change and now our signs say ‘Trump ducks releasing his tax returns.’  And we haven’t had anymore trouble.”



As Project Veritas points out, this direct coordination between Clinton, Brazile and Americans United For Change is a violation of federal election laws:



“The ducks on the ground are likely ‘public communications’ for purposes of the law.  It’s political activity opposing Trump, paid for by Americans United For Change funds but controlled by Clinton/her campaign.”



Here is the full video just released:



As a reminder, below are parts 1 & 2 of the Project Veritas series in case you missed them.


Video 1 revealed DNC efforts to incite violence at Trump rallies:



Video 2 provided the democrat playbook on how to commit “mass voter fraud”:



This article was written by Tyler Durden and originally published at Zero Hedge.