Dr. Pieczenik Unloads On Trump Administration Over 'Disastrous' Afghanistan Decision

Content originally published at iBankCoin.com

Dr. Steve Pieczenik went on an expletive-filled 20 minute rant today on Infowars – blasting everyone from Trump to McMaster to ‘Mad Dog’ Mattis over the decision to send more troops into Afghanistan.

No need to flash Dr. Pie’s full list of credentials again – for the unaware, just know that he’s an expert in all types of warfare and counterintelligence, ran PsyOps for the CIA, and served under 5 previous administrations. Tom Clancy based the “Jack Ryan” character on Dr. Pie, and if we are to believe him - he speaks for a splinter element of "white hat" intelligence officials who worked with Julian Assange to expose Hillary Clinton and her operation.

While Alex Jones currently supports President Trump’s troop surge in Afghanistan, Dr. Pie let loose in a fire-spitting rage over what he considers a massive lie to the American public.

“We’re gonna have a bloodbath that we’ve never seen before.This is not about terrorism, that’s bullshit. This is not about 9/11, that’s bullshit.” –Dr. Pie

Highlights from the interview (video below): 

Lies, Cowardice and Disaster

“Not only has the president lied to the American public, but more importantly the generals Mattis, McMaster, the people we helped to put in have lied to themselves and to the American public. These are generals who know better…”

Trump again repeats that we were attacked on 9/11. This is always about 9/11.I told you from day one, when I came on this show it was about guys like me and others who said; these generals are cowards. They’re moral intellectual cowards. I’ve known that about McMaster because we paid him. I knew that about Mattis.

This is a disaster. There is no strategy. McMaster is an idiot. 

It’s bullshit. The real ISIS was created by the CIA. The real Al Qaeda was created by the CIA. We don’t have a war on terror. This is 16 years of insurgency in a place that’s not even a country/ McMaster knows that, Mattis knows that, I’ve been in Afghanistan.

Trump is now on notice that we will work against him. 

Daddy issues?

Alex Jones: How did they get [Trump] to do this when he’s very pig headed and always does what he thinks is best?

Dr. Pie: Because you gotta remember, when his father wanted to get rid of him and put him into disciplinary action, he was sent to a military academy. He then refused to fight in Vietnam. So he basically looks to generals as if they’re mentors and fathers. These generals are what I call idiot savants. They know what they read but they don’t know how to create a war and win a war.

Does Trump deserve ANY credit?

Alex Jones: Does Trump not get any credit though that he controlled them so far, and didn’t let them expand the war in Syria?

Dr. Pie: No, he gets no credit whatsoever. This is not a question of a grade. This is a question of what we call the ‘existential moment.’ You want to go to war, it takes 6 seconds to go to war. You want to get out of war, it’s taken us 17 years to find out what the hell we’re doing there. We don’t belong there. Men are dying there every day – we have no strategy, and putting more men into this place is not principaled rationality.

Follow the money… 

Alex Jones: Why are they doing it?

Dr. Pie: There’s six trillion dollars in that war, and whose going to make money: KBR. Who makes money in Africa, KBR. What are we doing in Djibouti, the same thing. I’ve got soldiers who come back and say what the hell was I doing in Africa? Why was I in Djibouti, Sudan, Somalia? The soldiers have no idea what they’re doing.

Trump has no understanding what war is about. He has no understanding what it is to begin a war, and to complete a war. Neither do these generals. None of these generals were involved in finishing a war. They’re not like Eisenhower.

‘I guarantee you we will have another bloodbath.’ 

Watch below: 

Follow on Twitter @ZeroPointNow § Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Democratic Operative Says Hillary Clinton’s DNC Claims Are “F***ing Bulls***”

(ZHE) Angry Democrats are pushing back against criticisms that Hillary Clinton levied against the party during an interview earlier this week, saying Clinton “mischaracterized” the DNC’s work and the quality of its data operation while “needlessly stoking internal divisions,” according to the Hill.

During an interview with Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg at the Recode “Code” conference earlier this week, Clinton blamed the FBI, DNC, Russian agents – everyone but herself – for her stunning election loss in November. RNC Chair Ronna Romney McDaniel said Clinton’s comments were completely lacking in self-awareness.

Clinton has repeatedly blamed the DNC even though leaked emails have shown that the committee favored her during her primary fight against Sen. Bernie Sanders. Clinton blasted the committee as having “mediocre to poor, non-existent, wrong” data operation, the Hill reported. The remarks were also seen as a rebuke of President Obama, who chose the leaders of the DNC during his tenure.

This is all about the last campaign. And really, what Democrats should be focusing on, and what I think Hillary Clinton should be figuring out, is how do we empower the DNC to have the best data resources to win races this year, in 2018 and 2020,” a former DNC aide said.

“Having hard feelings about the data that you may or may not have received in 2016 ultimately is not the reason why we lost.”

The former secretary of state blamed the party’s polling data for failing to predict how close the race was in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania – the three battleground states that ultimately handed the election to Trump. But at least one former DNCer vehemently pushed back against Clinton’s allegations, saying that she was trying to blame the DNC for her own lapse in judgment.

Andrew Therriault, who served as the DNC’s director of data science until last June, said Clinton’s claims were “f—ing bulls—” in a series of tweets that have since been deleted.

Therriault accused Clinton’s team of ignoring DNC data that warned of a close race in the three states that, by narrow margins, ultimately handed Trump his Electoral College victory: Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

“All that said, irony of her bashing DNC data: *our* models never had mi/wi/pa looking even close to safe. Her team thought they knew better,” Therriault wrote.

As the Hill reports, Clinton made several appearances in Pennsylvania during the final months of the campaign, including on the eve of the election. But she spent little time campaigning in Michigan and Wisconsin. Ultimately, both states flipped from the Democrats to the GOP column for the first time in decades.

Another Democratic operative – identified as a “strong Clinton supporter – noted that North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper used the same data that Clinton had access to, but managed to win in a battleground state that went for Trump.

John Hagner, a Democratic consultant who tapped the same DNC database while working on congressional and gubernatorial races last cycle, said Clinton misfired in criticizing the data in lieu of the campaign operatives entrusted to use it effectively.

The data are merely the “raw ingredients,” he said, while the targeting operation is “the chef that decides what to do with them.” The chef, in this case, was Clinton’s campaign team.

“Roy Cooper used the same data in North Carolina and won,” Hagner said Thursday by phone, referring to the state’s newly elected Democratic governor. “So it’s not that the data didn’t work, it’s that you have to make different decisions with it.

“Singling out the DNC, which does the best that they can do with a system that’s hard to work with, blaming them and not the decisions that got made with that data — which is definitely her campaign’s responsibility — just seemed really off-key.”

The Republicans, for their part, quickly capitalized on Hillary’s contentious remarks, highlighting her comments in press releases sent to reporters with subject lines like “We Finally Agree With Hillary” the Hill reported.

For reasons that we’ll probably never understand, the DNC decided not to hit back against Hillary. Instead, the organization sent the Hill a statement highlighting new DNC Chairman Tom Perez’s efforts to improve party infrastructure.

“Tom has said before that the DNC was not firing on all cylinders and that’s why he did a top-to-bottom review that included technology,” DNC spokesman Michael Tyler said.

“Tom is already deeply engaged with the outpouring of support from Democrats across the country, from Silicon Valley to suburban Georgia, who want to help improve the data and tech, get it in the hands of more organizers everywhere, and build the grassroots funding stream required to support those efforts.”

Unsurprisingly, Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz didn’t return a call for comment – despite, as the Hill noted, serving as DNC Chair for nearly all of the Clinton primary campaign.

By Tyler Durden / Republished with permission / Zero Hedge / Report a typo

Goldman Sachs Stock Is Up 50 Percent in 6 Months (Video)

Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com

General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com

Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com

Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com

Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com

Advertise With Us

CNN Caught Lying Twice In One Day! Nancy Sinatra and Reddit Put The Brakes On #FakeNews

CNN just can"t stop lying! The purveyors of #FakeNews have once again been caught, twice, peddling propaganda on Inauguration day.

First, Nancy Sinatra called them out for a bullshit tweet suggesting she wasn"t happy with Trump"s use of a Frank Sinatra song during the Inauguration:

Second, CNN published a bullshit article suggesting a low turnout compared to Obama, except the picture they used for Trump’s Inauguration appears to be from much earlier in the day:

 

And the full frame of what CNN claims is Trump"s turnout:

Sorry assholes, someone threw this up on Reddit about an hour ago:

Hey $TWX, can you get your bitch on a leash?

 

Content originally generated at iBankCoin.com * Follow on Twitter @ZeroPointNow

"The Spiritual Center" of the Democratic Party, John Lewis, Says Trump Is Illegitimate Because Muh Russians

The cuckery has reached a fevered pitch and the democratic party, in what can only be construed as a traumatic emotional breakdown on an institutional level, are throwing the gauntlet down here and now by sending out the so called "spiritual center" of the party, Congressman John Lewis -- declaring Trump "illegitimate" because (wait for it) MUH RUSSIANS.

It has been an absolute blitzkrieg of U.S. intelligence leaks and disinformation, all designed to damage the incoming President -- coordinated by uniparty shills in both the republican and democratic parties.

Here"s Chuck Todd, channeling Ceasar Flickerman"s disingenuous and overly dramatic cadence from the movie The Hunger Games, interviewing  Congressman John Lewis -- who said he would not be attending the inauguration because the Russians hacked John Podesta"s email box and revealed the democratic party was an organization rife with both corruption and criminality at the highest levels. These revelations must"ve been the difference between electoral college winship and bitter defeat, obviously.

Top Congressional Shill, John Lewis, says Trump Presidency Illegitimate. pic.twitter.com/a4fiM0A1o6

— The_Real_Fly (@The_Real_Fly) January 14, 2017

Charles Krauthammer, hardly a Trump fan, calls bullshit on all of these events -- suggesting a conspiracy to diminish the office of the President is at hand.

Content originally generated at iBankCoin.com