Showing posts with label Stagflation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stagflation. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 9, 2018

Stagflationary Crisis: Understanding The Cause Of America’s Ongoing Collapse

This report was originally published by Brandon Smith at Alt-Market.com



It is at times frustrating, but also interesting, to witness the progression of the mainstream’s awareness of economic crisis within the U.S. over the years. As an alternative economist, I have had the “privilege” of perching outside the financial narrative and observing our economy from a less biased position, and I have discovered a few things.


First, the mainstream economic media is approximately two to three years behind average alternative economists. At least, they don’t seem to acknowledge reality within our time frame. This may be deliberate (my suspicion) because the general public is not meant to know the truth until it is too late for them to react in a practical way to solve the problem. For example, it is a rather strange experience for me to see the term “stagflation” suddenly becoming a major buzzword in the MSM. It is almost everywhere in the past week ever since the last Federal Reserve meeting in which the central bank mentioned higher inflation pressures and removed references in its monthly statement to a “growing economy.”


For those unfamiliar with what stagflation is, it is essentially the loss of economic growth in numerous sectors coupled with a marked spike in consumer and manufacturing costs. In other words, prices keep going up while employment growth, wages, production, etc. decline.


I have been warning about a stagflationary crisis as the ultimate result of central bank bailouts and QE for many years. In 2011, I published an article titled ‘The Debt Deal Con: Is It Fooling Anyone?’ in which I predicted that the Fed would resort to a third round of quantitative easing (they did). This prediction was based on the fact that the previous two QE events had not resulted in the kind of results the central bankers were obviously looking for. At that time, the stock market remained a dubious mess on the verge of a renewed crash, the U.S. debt rating was about to be downgraded by S&P, true employment growth was dismal, etc. The Fed needed something spectacular to keep the system propped up, at least until they were ready to trigger the next stage of the collapse.


In that same article I also discussed the inevitable end result of this stimulus bonanza:  Stagflation.


QE3 was a dramatic con, along with Operation Twist. The Fed got exactly what it wanted — an unprecedented bull market rally in stocks and temporary stability in bond markets. As stocks jumped higher and higher despite all negative fundamental data, the mainstream simply regurgitated the fool’s narrative that a “recovery” was upon us. But now things are changing and no illusion lasts forever.


The second observation I have made is that central banking elites and their cronies tend to give warnings on great economic shifts, but only about a year before they occur. They do this for a few reasons. One, because they are the people that engineer these crisis events in the first place and it’s not very hard to predict a calamity you helped create. Two, because it makes them appear prophetic when they are not, while at the same time giving the public as little time as possible to prepare. And three, because it gives them plausible deniability when the crisis actually happens, because they can claim they “tried to warn us”, though unfortunately it was too late.


The Bank For International Settlements warned of the derivatives and credit crash in 2007, about a year before the disaster struck. In 2017, former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan warned of inevitable “stagflation not seen since the 1970s.” In later comments, he and others attributed this potential crisis to the policies of Donald Trump.


It is important to note that stagflation is entirely the fault of central bankers and not the presidency, though the White House has indeed aided the Fed in its efforts regardless of who sits in the Oval Office.


Years ago there was a rather idiotic battle between financial analysts over what the end result of the Fed’s massive stimulus measures would be. One side argued that deflation would be the outcome and that no amount of Fed printing would overtake the vast black hole of debt conjured by the derivatives implosion. The other side argued that the Fed would continue to print perpetually, resorting to QE4 or possibly “QE infinity” and negative interest rates as a means to stave off a market crash for decades (like Japan) while at the same time initiating a Weimar-style inflationary bonanza.


Both sides were wrong because they refused to acknowledge the third option — stagflation.


The Fed clearly found a way to direct inflationary pressures into certain parts of the economy while allowing deflationary pressures to weigh down other parts of the economy. They also are NOT sticking to their previous strategy of holding interest rates down while pumping up markets with talk of further QE.


Deflationary proponents used to sarcastically argue that if people really believed that inflation would be the consequence of Fed activities then they should jump into the housing market because they would make a mint on price increases. Well, this is exactly what has happened. Home prices have continued to surge despite all fundamentals, including dismal home buyer stats which hit an all time low in 2016 and have barely recovered since.


I use home prices as a prime example of stagflation because the housing market constitutes around 15 percent to 18 percent of total GDP in the U.S. Since items like food and fuel are not counted in the calculation of the CPI index, housing should be the next consideration. Signs of stagflation in housing are a sure indicator of stagflation in the rest of the economy.


The manner in which housing is calculated in the CPI and GDP is a bit odd, of course. Housing is not included in these stats in terms of home purchases annually. In fact, home purchases and improvements are treated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as an “investment” and not as a consumer purchase, which means they are not considered a measure of inflation. However, home values in terms of their “rental cost and change in cost” are counted in CPI.


As we all know, rent prices across the country have been skyrocketing in the past few years along with home prices, while at the same time home buyers have dwindled and the millennial generation is staying at home with mom and dad rather than paying out monthly for homes and apartments. That is to say, in a normal economic environment fewer buyers should result in lower prices, but this is not what has happened. The question is, how has the Federal Reserve and QE contributed to this example of stagflation?


First, the Fed’s artificial support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac after the derivatives debacle allowed for the continued propping up of the housing market when bad debt should have been allowed to cycle out of the system and house prices should have been allowed to fall.


Second, the Fed’s bailout funding of Fannie Mae directly benefited companies like Blackstone, which has become a partner with Fannie Mae and one of the largest buyers of homes in the country. Blackstone has not purchased tens of thousands of homes for resale, but for conversion into rentals. Blackstone’s vast purchases of single family homes has artificially boosted home values across the nation and given the false impression of a housing recovery that does not really exist.


Third, a very interesting discovery; while the central bank under Jerome Powell has become more and more aggressive in its balance sheet reductions, a move which has directly contributed to the recent decline in stock markets, there is one asset class that the Fed has been ADDING to its balance sheet — Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS).  These purchases tend to take place directly after older MBS have been allowed to roll over, meaning, the Fed is maintaining a relatively steady number of MBS while it is dumping other assets.


MBS represent around 40 percent of the Fed’s total balance sheet, and the Fed’s continued fiat support of the MBS market helps explain why home prices refuse to fall despite negative fundamentals. It is also interesting to me that the Fed has chosen to dump certain assets that appear to be causing a downward reaction in stock markets and other sectors while maintaining assets that keep housing prices high. It’s almost as if the Fed wants stagflation…


Finally, while the Fed’s interest rate hikes do not traditionally have a direct correlation to home mortgage rates, there is an indirect correlation. Fears of inflation sometimes ironically create inflation, and as the fed raises interest rates, mortgage rates tend to track. In 2018 mortgage rates have spiked, climbing 48 basis points since the beginning of the year.


This contributes to higher home prices as well a perceived rental values according to the CPI.


The source of almost every instability within our economy can be tracked straight back to the Federal Reserve and the “too-big-to-fail” corporations they bailed out after the credit crash. The current stagflationary development is no different. Stagflation will ultimately result in extreme price increases on necessary goods and services far beyond what we have already seen while the public’s ability to keep up with those prices will falter.


The fact that this issue is FINALLY hitting the mainstream should be concerning to everyone. For when a crisis development is discussed in the mainstream, it means we are on the verge of that crisis reaching its nexus. In June the Fed will raise interest rates yet again despite failing fundamentals. The Fed will continue to cite inflationary pressures, and the Fed will continue to cut its balance sheet. There is no room for delusion on this anymore. The Fed will not stop on its current path. In the meantime, central banks will continue to blame external forces such as trade wars and Trump era policies for stagflation while ignoring the trillions in fiat they have expertly poisoned our financial system with.


All bubbles collapse, but not all bubbles collapse in the exact same way. I believe the Fed has created a perfect storm of combined deflationary and inflationary factors; an economic bomb to surpass all economic bombs.


******


If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here. We greatly appreciate your patronage.


You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com


After 8 long years of ultra-loose monetary policy from the Federal Reserve, it’s no secret that inflation is primed to soar. If your IRA or 401(k) is exposed to this threat, it’s critical to act now! That’s why thousands of Americans are moving their retirement into a Gold IRA. Learn how you can too with a free info kit on gold from Birch Gold Group. It reveals the little-known IRS Tax Law to move your IRA or 401(k) into gold. Click here to get your free Info Kit on Gold.

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Fed Hikes Rate – Stagflation Ahead?

Yesterday’s decision by the Fed to hike the interest rate is said to be needed to cool off a super-heated economy. But where is the economy super-heated? Labor, GDP, debt…all indicators are the opposite. Is the bag of tricks finally empty? What next?



Saturday, March 18, 2017

The Bubble Boys

Visit full archives at The Entry Points:



There is a famous Seinfeld episode about an arrogant guy who unfortunately has to live in a bubble. This is the same situation which millions and millions of good people around the world are in. The arrogant central bankers, The Bubble Boys (+ Janet), have created the conditions for speculation to metastasize all over this Planet. The rampant money printing and the low rates have "forced" speculators to pile into numerous markets, turning them into orgies of greed. Speculators have piled into collector cars, high end art, and knick knacks and doo dads galore. But those are just side shows. The truly disgusting side effects stemming from decisions made by the arrogant, omniscient Bubble Boys +, can be seen in the real estate market. Their reckless hail Mary "policies" (experiments) have forced way too many good people into very tough situations, as rents and house prices have soared (housing costs). But of course the incessantly rising home prices are great for speculators. And many of these speculators have lived off of the government teat (courtesy of the always shafted non-insider tax payers) for years. But unfortunately the President apparently has no problem with these "teaters", like Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and his RE shenanigans. Many of the small, independent flippers and rehabbers aside, the insiders, thanks to our compassionate governments all over the world, have gotten disgustingly, grotesquely rich. And their lucre (basically) has come at the expense of the 99%, who have zero say in the policies enacted by the arrogant clowns running governments and central banks. So as government-connected Blackrock keeps piling up the profits, the average citizens suffer. If there is truly karma, then it"s time for that situation to reverse.


So as these RE banditos move from pueblo to pueblo, pillaging, plundering and looting, the unfortunate citizens have to pay their ransom to their new landlords. And if they wanted to buy, they are forced to pay bubble prices, or keep renting at higher and higher rates. We are so lucky to have such compassionate leaders around the world. And now Portland, Oregon has been invaded by the marauders:


"The migration from Silicon Valley, as well as Seattle, adds to the pressure on Portland real-estate prices.


New arrivals flush with money from home sales in the higher-priced regions often bid up prices. Through most of last year, the monthly rate of increase in Portland home prices led the nation, according to the S&P Case-Schiller price index.


Meanwhile, rapidly rising rents are straining tenants.



 Scott San Filippo, a software developer from the Bay Area, got a front-row seat to that process after he moved to Portland last year. His new home was just across the street from a four-plex that was sold to a new landlord. He then watched three of the tenants, a single father with his son, a couple and an older gentleman, vacate."


And of course, what does the compassionate government do, as the situation was caused by the governments and central banks to begin with - by meddling in the "free market" (not that their are any around anymore)? So just add in more bureaucracies and meddling:



"I was shocked how people could be forced out." .... "In San Francisco, there is rent control."


In Portland, there is a new push for rent control.


That movement has gotten a boost from state House Speaker Tina Kotek, a Portland Democrat, who supports a bill in the Legislature that would remove a statewide ban on rent control. She also backs a temporary, one-year measure to limit rent increases to no more than 5 percent and forbid evictions without cause.


"Too many property owners are taking advantage of the market conditions by evicting tenants, raising rents and finding new people who can pay more each month," Kotek said in a September speech."


So as the speculation keeps forcing average folks to make very tough choices, and the arrogant buffoons running the show continue downing their cognac and devouring their Kobe beef filets, the citizens are getting extremely restless. They continue to see their real wages fall, as everything else around keeps going up in price (stagflation). But the elites time is coming. As the Seinfeld episode ends, George pops the bubble boy"s bubble, and an angry mob chases him and his colleagues down the street. The central bankers and politicians will suffer the same fate when their government/central bank bubbles finally implode. And we"re getting close.

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Stagflation Shock: ISM Shows Input Costs Soaring At Fastest Since 2011

Input cost inflation is soaring at its highest since September 2014 according to Markit"s US Manufacturing PMI survey (which surged in January to 55.0 - slightly less than the 55.1 prelim print - the highest since March 2015). New orders accelerated but employment slipped and despite the surge in costs, factory gate charges increased only modestly. Despite disappointing "hard" data from durable goods, ISM survey data confirms the bounce (highest since 2014) but Prices Paid spiked to its highest since 2011 (and export orders dropped).


Hard vs Soft data... ISM CEO Holcomb summed it all up perfectly: ISM GAIN DRIVEN BY HOPES, EXPECTATIONS UNDER TRUMP




Prices Paid are soaring... (and export orders dropping)


ISM notes that...


  • Commodities Down in Price: None.

  • Commodities in Short Supply: None.

So, to be clear, everything is up in price, but there is no shortage of anything.



New Orders were stagnant...




And the full breakdown...




Almost every ISM respondent is exuberant...



  • “Demand very steady to start the year.” (Chemical Products)




  • “January revenue target slightly lower following a big December shipment month.” (Computer & Electronic Products)




  • “Strong start to the new year. Production is increasing and we are adding capacity.” (Plastics & Rubber Products)




  • “Business looks stronger moving into the first quarter of 2017.” (Primary Metals)




  • “Economic outlook remains stable and no current effects of geopolitical changes appear to be penetrating market conditions.” (Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products)




  • “Sales bookings are exceeding expectations. We are starting to see supply shortages in hot rolled steel due to the curtailment of imports.” (Machinery)




  • “Year starting on pace with Q4 2016.” (Transportation Equipment)




  • “Business conditions are good, demand is generally increasing.” (Miscellaneous Manufacturing)




  • “Conditions and outlook remain positive. Raw material prices are stable resulting in stable margins. Asset utilization remains high.” (Petroleum & Coal Products)




  • “Steady demand from automotive.” (Fabricated Metal Products)



Commenting on the final PMI data, Chris Williamson, Chief Business Economist at IHS Markit said:





The US manufacturing sector has started 2017 with strong momentum. Despite exports being subdued by the strong dollar, order books are growing at the fastest pace for over two years on the back of improved domestic demand.



“With optimism about the year ahead at the highest since last March, the outlook has also brightened.



“Production is consequently growing at the strongest rate for almost two years and inventories are rising at a rate not seen for nearly a decade as firms respond to higher demand, suggesting the goods-producing sector will make a decent contribution to first quarter GDP.



“With input costs also rising at the steepest rate for over two years, and hiring sustained at an encouragingly solid pace as firms expand capacity, all of the survey indicators point to the Fed hiking interest rates again soon.”


Thursday, January 19, 2017

"Costs Are Rising, Wages Are Dropping" - The 'Real' Economy That Obama Left For Trump

As President Obama held his last press conference this afternoon, basking in the warm afterglow of an over-sampled poll showing his favorability near record highs, it would appear he (and the press corps) forgot to mention that for most Americans - the 80% in production and nonsupervisory roles - this morning"s data showed real wages actually dropping for the first time since 2013.


Bloomberg"s Vincent Cignarella notes "Costs are rising, while pay isn’t: is the U.S. on the road to stagflation?" Disposable income for U.S. consumers, as measured by real average earnings, took another turn lower in December as we noted earlier with headline inflation rising above 2% for the first time in more than two years.


As The Wall Street Journal reports, for several years now, wages have become a key barometer not only on the recovery, but on how much of the recovery is filtering down to the working class.





Companies have been reluctant to invest in their business without clearer signs of consumer demand, the key ingredient in crafting a organically strong economy. Wages and consumer demand trends underlie every valuation bet being placed in the markets right now. Understanding what is and isn’t happening is critical.



The inflation numbers get netted out against wage growth, to produce the “real,” or inflation-adjusted, wage rates. Average hourly wages, as per the December jobs report, rose 2.9% from a year ago. So, if you just compare that number to the inflation number, real average hourly earnings rose 0.8%.



A deeper dive, though, reveals that for many Americans, their wages are not outpacing inflation at all. For all production and nonsupervisory employees – a group that comprises 80% of all jobs in america – total average weekly earnings in December rose to $732.48 (about $38,000 a year) from $718.79 – up 1.9%. That rate is below this morning’s inflation numbers.



So, again according to the BLS, average weekly earnings fell 0.1%.



That’s right. For 80% of American workers, their weekly paycheck, adjusted for inflation, fell in 2016.



This could be trouble for the Federal Reserve and lead to a more dovish stance, especially if Trump’s economic promises come up short.


As Bloomberg"s Cignarella notes, if the Fed cuts its rate hike expectations because of stagnant wages as inflation keeps accelerating, it could continue to erode real U.S. earnings and lead to a lower dollar as it has in the past.




This decline in disposable income may be the reason retail sales, while generally positive, have been trending lower during the same period.


This could lead to slower economic growth, while prices continue to rise: stagflation.


The Trump reflation trade may be the only thing that stands in the way, but details are scant.


Lack of clarity on fiscal spending will continue to restrain capital spending, which some argue has been restricted by excess regulation. A reluctant consumer along with miserly business investment would certainly change the Fed’s rate hike projections.


The overall story remains, there is excess supply and mild demand.


With capital expenditure new orders trending sideways and retail sales and real wages declining, the ground for stagflation has already been laid.


* * *


Not exactly the rosy picture of economic growth being spun by the media as Obama transitions to Trump.

Thursday, January 12, 2017

RBC Explains Why The Market Is Dumping, Adds "This Is Not The Big Short"... Yet

Having yesterday revealed what he believes is the single biggest risk to the buyside in general, and hedge funds in particular, in today"s market (the answer, for those who missed it, is the strong dollar suddenly turning weak, as it is continues to do today), here is the follow-up note from RBC"s Charlie McElliggott, explaining where we stand now.


* * *


Where We Stand


As laid-out in yesterday’s Big Picture note “THE SINGLE LARGEST MACRO INPUT RISK TO THE BUYSIDE,” as asymmetrically ‘long US Dollar’ positioning ‘tips over,’ so too should we expect a drawdown on consensual macro and thematic-equity trades.


Tactical cases are everywhere for an extension / acceleration of mean-reversion trades, largely based-upon positioning excess and reversing technicals.


As the case has been built over the past month and a half in the “RBC Big Picture,” reversal strategies are a regular feature in the January landscape—especially after such clear trend developed in the back half of ’16 with regards to ‘reflation—those being:’


  • Long USD, stocks, small cap / domestically levered, value factor, cyclicals beta, inflation, high tax rate, HY / high beta credit (CCC over BB), CNH, curve steepeners, copper

  • Short USTs / ED$ / duration, euro, yen, EMFX / EM eq / EM bonds, growth, defensives, low beta / low vol, VIX, gold

As some of the reversion was ‘pre-traded’ in the back-half of Dec, it made sense to us that this January wouldn’t be an outright repeat of the violent VaR shocks experienced in a number of recent Januarys as ‘momentum’ reversed hard and everything from ‘bonds vs stocks’ to equity factors turned upside-down.


That said…the driver for the acceleration of ‘reversal trades’ yesterday into the overnight was the Barnum-esque circus of a press conference yesterday from President-elect Trump


Expectations were built for a more “Presidential” tone, with more granular ‘policy talk’--especially as it pertained to the nuances of the tax plan, fiscal stimulus, and the Obamacare unwind.  Needless to say, we got a “goat rodeo” instead, and it spooked a lot of the TACTICALLY long reflation crowd.


Reflationary growth expectations have clearly been a significant driver of the USD ‘bull case’—but the tax component (overseas profits $ repatriation / border-adjusted tax (BAT) system theoretically driving ~15% currency appreciation) has been a massive-input as well.  As stated yesterday, any resetting of expectations there (“watering down” of the BAT) will see a lower Dollar concurrently.


Sure, spec net Dollar positioning is at 1 year highs.  But even more than ‘just’ the cumulative FX positioning itself is the observation that the Dollar is the “grand unifying asset” of the “domestic growth / reflation” trade theme.  So in that sense, “long USD” is a factor embedded in nearly every one of the aforementioned popular macro longs and shorts.


The idea I have to again stress here is this: nearly all of the gains from these “reflation” trades were “last year’s business.”  Point being, YTD, most of these trades are moving from “not great” to now approaching “REAL negative PNL.”  As risk-managers are highly-sensitive to such start of year drawdowns and we near the ever-present “tight stops,” you have to BOLO for capitulatory flows (perhaps as best expressed by yesterday’s mega-impressive $20B 10 year UST reopening auction which saw a blistering 70% indirect bid, which caused a very significant squeeze in USTs across boards).


It should be noted that thus far, the ‘least’ relatively effected trades have been the thematic and factor trades within the equities-complex.  Reasons for this are ‘three-fold’:


  1. The very tactical nature of discretionary macro (making generalizations here but…) is concentrated on the FX, rates and commods side of the ledger as opposed to equities per se.  Thus, we’re seeing much of the reversal ‘profit-taking’ or ‘unwind’ concentrated in those ‘pure macro’ assets. 

  2. Equities flows are still being largely dictated by the slow-moving rotation of ‘real money’ as they reallocate portfolios after living under the old “slow growth / slow inflation” narrative.  Now we currently see said ‘sticky long-term money’ reallocation into cyclical sectors like financials, industrials and energy, as again evidenced by yesterday’s NYSE MOC with the largest notional sector buys being #1 Financials and #2 Industrials… by a wide margin (“pros on the close”), and has been that way a majority of days in ’17 YTD. 

  3. From a more tactical perspective, with the USD at the center of this unwind, the Dollar weakness has driven WTI higher, which in turn has kept the Energy sector and more importantly inflation-expectations “BID” (per the Quant-Insight macro factor PCA model, higher “inflation-expectations” continue to show as the largest positive price input driving SPX).

The US Dollar index (DXY) has now cracked lower through its 50DMA for the first time since the immediate period post- Election.  The 100 ‘psychological level’ also has some technical significance and is very much ‘in play’ now.  From there, we would have a looooong way to go down to the 100DMA (98.94) and the 200DMA (97.03). 


What can arrest this unwind from ‘metastasizing’ further?  The thing that drove the “true” basis for the “reflation trade” long before Trump won in the first place—the continued-ascension of cold hard global data.  As listed yesterday, the collective trajectory higher of the data has been nothing short of breath-taking, from global PMIs to Chinese inflation to US average hourly wages and ‘animal spirits’ confidence metrics. 


The data still makes a very real case for higher rates in the longer-term, and with it, more US hikes / quicker exits from say the ECB than the market is currently anticipating. Obviously this would be USD- positive.


Tactically-speaking in the ‘now,’ the Dollar reversal lower in this case is helping reignite the commodities bid as well, and with it, inflation expectations remain very strong (see Breakevens ‘strong like bull’).


And of course too, flow will be a massive driver of this: still being told that some in both the ‘overseas real money’ crowd and leveraged fund community would look to fade the rates move at say ~ 2.20 level.  In conjunction with the US varietal of real money rotating “growthier” in equities as well (‘turning the Titanic’ slowly), stocks can remain bid over the coming months (not for nothing, but I’ve had discussions with 3 large distressed credit funds in recent weeks who are concentrating much of the ‘going-forward’ within the equities universe—point being stocks continue to have that ‘best place to be’ perception). 


It still feels like there is another meaningful stocks rally to come, especially after the “positioning excess” is cleared through this “mean-reversion wobble” period.


* * *


Only then can we begin talking about “the big short” around say a “stagflation” or “real rates” financial-tightening trade.



U.S. REAL RATES AND U.S. DOLLAR INDEX SINCE ELECTION: