In response to criticism about the stereotypical Indian character, Apu, the co-founder of The Simpsons said, "It’s a time in our culture where people love to pretend they’re offended.”
The post Simpsons Creator Refuses to Apologize for ‘Apu,’ and Exposes Danger of ‘Pretending to be Offended’ appeared first on The Free Thought Project.
Starbucks and the Philadelphia police department are on the defensive as a video has gone viral showing them allegedly arresting two men for "waiting for a friend while black."
The post WATCH: Two Men Arrested for Waiting for a Friend in Starbucks—”While Black” appeared first on The Free Thought Project.
(ANTIMEDIA) — Americans calling for gun control in 2018 often argue that a cursory glance at history proves there was never meant to be an unrestrained right to own firearms — that there were always meant to be restrictions on gun ownership. In at least one respect, they are correct: United States history shows there has […]
I once heard that “gun control is people control.” This phrase had a profound affect on me. Growing up as an inner-city black kid, I had a unique perspective on gun control. I saw how guns were used by some evil men to do evil deeds. I grew up seeing friends and family lose their lives to inner-city gun violence. I also saw how important guns were to the law-abiding vast majority of people who live in the inner-city. These are people who want to live their lives and take care care of their families, and need to have the means to protect them.
As the gun control debate rages, I have examined the country’s most restrictive gun laws and realized, as many of Americans already know, that the most restrictive gun laws are found in large urban areas. These large urban areas just happen to have the largest percentages of people of color (a combination of Hispanic, Black, and Asian).
For example:
New York City 54%
Los Angeles 69%
Chicago 67%
The effort of state and local governments to deny large swaths of their communities the basic right of self defense was appalling. Upon examination, I found it shocking how much effort was exhausted to deny the people that need to defend themselves the most, the means to do so. That’s when it hit me, gun control is the most overt yet subtle, form of racism and a brief examination of American History supports this idea. Gun Control is Racism.
Racist arms laws predate the establishment of the United States. Starting in 1751, the French Black Code required Louisiana colonists to stop any blacks, and if necessary, beat “any black carrying any potential weapon, such as a cane.” If a black refused to stop on demand, and was on horseback, the colonist was authorized to “shoot to kill.” In the Spanish colonies of North America in the 1700 and 1800’s, black slaves in search of freedom from their bondage orchestrated several armed revolts. This resulted in laws passed which prohibited all blacks, free and slave, from carrying arms.
It is not surprising that an examination of the pre-civil war firearms laws specifically prohibited free blacks from carrying firearms. One example is the 1834 change to the Tennessee Constitution, where Article XI, 26 of the 1796 Tennessee Constitution was revised from: “That the freemen of this State have a right to keep and to bear arms for their common defence,” to: “That the free white men of this State have a right to keep and to bear arms f or their common defence.” Then, in 1840 we start to see such ideas written into statute. An 1840 North Carolina statute provided:
“That if any free negro, mulatto, or free person of color, shall wear or carry about his or her person, or keep in his or her house, any shot gun, musket, rifle, pistol, sword, dagger or bowie-knife, unless he or she shall have obtained a licence therefor from the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions of his or her county, within one year preceding the wearing, keeping or carrying therefor, he or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be indicted therefor.”
Such laws weren’t written to prohibit slaves from carrying firearms, they specifically referenced “free negro’s.” As we moved into the Reconstruction Era we see the springing up of various “Black Codes” that restricted the freedom of newly freed black slaves. Specific “Black Codes” adopted after the Civil War required blacks to obtain a license before carrying or possessing firearms or Bowie knives. These restrictive gun laws played a part in the efforts of Republicans at the time to get the Fourteenth Amendment ratified, because it was difficult for night riders (the early incarnation of the KKK) to generate the correct level of terror in a victim who was returning fire. The Jim Crow era of the early 1900’s gave more reason for blacks to be armed, but also birthed more statutes preventing so. Such statutes paved the way for tragedies like the Rosewood Massacre in December 1922. A massacre that resulted in the murders of unarmed black people and destruction of a black town at the hands of racists mobs and the KKK. Some eyewitness accounts suggested a death toll as high as 150.
As recently as 1941, Florida Supreme Court Justice Rivers H. Buford (1878-1959), ruling about the state’s gun-control laws (Watson v. Stone, 4 So. 2nd 703), stated, “The original Act of 1893 was passed when there was a great influx of Negro laborers into the state… The Act was passed for the purpose of disarming the Negro laborers… The statute was never intended to be applied to the white population, and in practice has never been so applied.”
Today is not 1870 nor is it the 1920’s, and when proponents of restrictive gun control insist that their motivations are color-blind, there is a chance (although small) that they are genuine in their concerns. But it is undeniable that gun control laws disproportionately restrict the freedom of people of color. Any statue, ordinance, or bill, that disproportionately restricted the freedoms of people of color, is by definition a racist law.
When one of my liberal friends asks me why I don’t support gun control or the buzz phrase “assault weapons ban,” my answer is simple; “I don’t support, nor do I wish to perpetuate, archaic and racist laws from the 1700’s.”
Gun Control is Racism.
The post Gun Control is Racism appeared first on Oath Keepers.
Despotism is not solely the preview of the state. When individuals or groups demonstrate their propensity to use savage force to inflict their world view on others, decent society is at risk. The “Black Lives Matter” thugs who have shown their disregard for civilized acculturation are a prime example of the defective thinking that permeates their shallow and twisted minds. Absent in their pomposity is any moral claim for their warped cause that advocates violence and murder. Genetic traits are supposed to be taboo for discussion, but when certain elements of sociopathic conduct is evident in brutal behavior, sane people have to ask if deplorable cultural norms are not the only factors that breed disturbed motives for initiating a race war.
How ridiculous it is to advocate a clash among races when the common enemy that fosters the breakdown of civilization has affected everyone in their sites. If warfare between controllers of the system and the humble serfs that pay homage to their masters comes to be, is it not prudent to understand just who the enemy is?
Black on white confrontations is regrettable because the elites have set up a social order that plays one group against another faction. Caucasians are often just as dumb as Afro-Americans for succumbing to this false template. Any thinking person acknowledges that assimilation of minorities and advancement into the common culture has advanced profoundly since the 1960’s.
There is no doubt that not all Blacks want or seek to be part of the European heritage that has formed the mores, laws and social institutions that formed America. That’s fine. Self-determination is a noble goal within the context of States Rights. However, repudiation of the traditions that built a representative republic is an affront to the ordinary people who accept that our past has much to be proud of, while committed to correct former injustices.
Are you brave enough to confront the truth about race? The “Great Society” of LBJ is responsible for the structural destruction of the Negro families. Initiating the false promises of racial equality and social prosperity through imposed governmental programs is a fool’s errand.
The United States is hardly a melting pot. It is more like a mixture of a dissimilar stew. This is sad, because the forces of discontent do not allow reasonable accommodation, must less a meeting of minds.
The predatory environment that has taken over in urban communities is a direct result of the methodical dismantling of the merchant economy. Substitution of government dependency for all things for survival can only result in a neo-feudal version of the plantation. Just look to the bankruptcy of Detroit and the prospects that Chicago follows soon.
Defying the rules of nature, results in the extinction of species. All one needs to do in order to understand the breakdown in the inner city community is to admit that there is no fundamental willingness among Blacks to focus on their true foe.
A persons color is not the issue. The need to speak the King’s English is not the problem. Prejudice towards their race is hardly the barrier it once was. No the unspoken issue why the “Black Lives Matter” hoodlums have emerged as the latest race baiting opportunists is that Black leaders are so timid or fearful to clean up their own house by hiding their heads in irrelevant victimhood.
This failure qualifies as being stuck on stupid.
The commendable leadership shown by Lt. General Russel Honoré during the Hurricane Katrina disaster needs to be duplicated in every city and hamlet in the country.
Cultural maturity and individual responsibility is the solution to break away from the collectivist grip. All Americans face this same undertaking irrespective of their race, ethnic background or country of origin.
Now are you ready to face up to the common threat to all of us?
The term Transhumanism may not be a household phrase but it an existential Armageddon. For the purpose of this analysis, the end game for humanity is not the elevation of body and machine for eternal paradise. No the ultimate motive is the extermination for the billions of useless eaters.
Now before your eye glaze over, stop and think.
Why is the world falling apart on every level? What is the cause of the undisrupted pattern of failed political leadership of virtually all state governments? Finally, why is the world on the brink of total economic collapse when it is self-evident that the cumulative global debt obligations are mathematically impossible to pay the compound interest much less retiring the principle?
Folks, it is all designed to push humanity into a global genocide. Culling the herd is in play. And arguing over trumped up race issues seems trivial when compared to the intentional loss of the communal soul of mankind.
Totalitarian Collectivism is the political gulag that is being implemented with each passing day. The Satanic Cult that has temporary control of most governments, social institutions and economic enslavement all adopt the central banking model of debt created finance and money.
If one does not understand this axiom of empirical reality, only confusion in thinking can follow.
Most people relish and even express their pride in being dumb as dirt. While they may not acknowledge those exact words, their conduct and behavior certainly verifies their actual demeanor.
When entire populations are unable to perceive their own genuine self-interest and keep looking for some other group or political system to blame for the failure of the “Great Society”, they demonstrate the weakness in their intelligence and moral compass.
People of color need to abandon the trap of being manipulated by the race confrontation strategy set into motion by the Illuminati demons that are behind the “Free Trade” protocols, agreements and organizations, which enrich and empower the mega billionaire class, while starving the masses.
Most unsophisticated and abused serfs or dependency parasites have never researched The Relevancy of the Illustrated Protocols of Zion. They are too busy looking for racists under ever sheet, while ignoring the king pin culprits who pull the strings behind the curtain of Oz.
It pains this author that the Planned Race Combat is documented to our mutual detriment. All people of good will are threatened with the breakdown in social order. A social revolution needs to follow, but it needs to be founded on the touchstone of non violence. Killing the police will beget more unrest and eventually a severe martial law response.
Law enforcement has deserted its legitimate peace keeping function. Emphatically, immunity from using excessive force should never be policy. If outlaws want to pillage and plunder, an armed citizenry is the alternative if police departments stand down in their proper duty to serve and protect.
If it comes down to exercising your natural right of self-defense, our advocacy for peaceful civil disobedience will lose ground. For this reason, the appeal of General Honoré holds true: “Don’t get stuck on stupid”.
The mindset of the collectivists is the basis, which produces a cultural malaise of hopelessness and systemic impoverishment. For six and half years a black President professed to “Fundamentally Transform America”. Oh so he did, but how did it work out?
The inability to see through this charlatan has allowed this most bigoted president to unravel race relations under his watch. Obama plays the race card at every opportunity, not to improve the plight of his constituency, but to their heightened detriment.
Continued support for his regime and policies fits the definition of being caught in a brainless void. The choice to render his reign repulsive is the correct course.
When the New World Order is being implemented with every horror imaginable, why are people so brain dead and reluctant to confront their multiplying dilemmas? Fear is often the answer.
Fright of being labeled a racist overcomes the closet moralist. Criticism of international finance runs the risk of being called anti-Semitic. In both cases the denial of the historic record outweighs the courage of being honest to the intellectual facts.
The end result is a Dumb as Dirt society. Afro-Americans need to overcome their disinformation rap culture and educate themselves in the timeless principles and moral canons embedded in the Western Civilization heritage. The core embodiment of the sanctity of life and the indivisible divine rights of the individual are the essence of self-government.
As the world descends into greater chaos, clergy and community leaders need to step forward and condemn the Black Lives Matter racism. If your kindred revere the message of Martin Luther King, how could you not practice his teachings? “I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character” is not just a cute phrase.
Immoral genes may be endemic in occult worshiping banksters, but there is nothing preventing repentant sinners from seeking forgiveness. An important step is to reject being a stuck on stupid dullard. All immortal souls have no race pigment.
The post Dumb As Dirt – The Mindset Of The Collectivists appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.
I have a confession to make. Kick me out of any possible minority group I might be a part of but didn’t know it, but any word ending in “-ism” annoys the daylights out of me.
Words to express our affront are being made up left and right by the mere addition of “ism” to the ends of what were formerly perfectly neutral words. It seems like pundits can take basically any word and add “ism” to the end of it and that means they’re being slighted. The list of isms could go on and on, but instead of promoting more equality, all they’re doing is promoting more division. Isn’t that divisionism?
Personally, I’m affronted by the constant barrage of affronts. When did we, as a nation, become such weenies? How is it that such a collection of whiners has become the vocal majority? Certain people are constantly offended and demand the attention of others so they can express the epic level of their personal offendedness.
So vast is the recent level of Great American Butthurt that no mainstream news outlet is complete without breathlessly exposing a secret “ism” each day. These secret “isms” are called “microaggressions,” defined as “the everyday verbal, nonverbal, and environmental slights, snubs, or insults, whether intentional or unintentional, which communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative messages to target persons based solely upon their marginalized group membership.”
Oh my gosh. SHUT UP ALREADY.
Here are some examples to support my highly unpopular opinion on this matter. Feel free to yell at me or agree with me in the comments. I promise not to tell you I’m offended. I really don’t care if you are black, brown, white, gay, straight…whatever. I’m just not into whining.
10 Ways Well-Meaning White Teachers Bring Racism Into Our Schools
In this little piece, the plight of the poor confused white teacher is brought to the forefront. White teachers are performing an injustice to children of any other race by mispronouncing their names or “valuing whiteness.”
Though I know there are actively racist teachers out there, most White teachers mean well and have no intention of being racist. Yet as people who are inscribed with Whiteness, it is possible for us to act in racist ways no matter our intentions. Uprooting racism from our daily actions takes a lifetime of work.
I’d just like to say that my children, blond and blue eyed, have their father’s Swiss last name that contains far too many vowels for American tongues, and not once did they ever have it immediately pronounced correctly by a new teacher. We always knew if someone said their first names and then began to stutter, they were calling on my children. Clearly, we too, have been discriminated against and my children’s very education was greatly placed at risk.
Casual Sexism in the Workplace May Hurt Women More Than You Think
Heaven forbid that someone tell a joke or make a comment that a woman looks nice at work. It’s sexist and destroying her chances at success, dontcha know?
While overt sexual harassment can make headlines, this study suggests that daily sexist jokes and comments made by co-workers can also chip away at a woman’s well-being. It’s not all bad news, though. According to the researchers, their findings can be used to spark progress: If employers recognize the detrimental effects of the more subdued, pervasive sexism, women may be motivated to make formal complaints and organization-wide actions can be taken.
Microaggressions: More than Just Race
This little gem is full of “isms” without calling them “isms”.
Microaggressions can be based upon any group that is marginalized in this society. Religion, disability, and social class may also reflect the manifestation of microaggressions. Some of these examples include the following.
• When bargaining over the price of an item, a store owner says to a customer, “Don’t try to Jew me down.” (Hidden message: Jews are stingy and money-grubbing.)
• A blind man reports that people often raise their voices when speaking to him. He responds by saying, “Please don’t raise your voice; I can hear you perfectly well.” (Hidden message: A person with a disability is defined as lesser in all aspects of physical and mental functioning).
• The outfit worn by a TV reality-show mom is described as “classless and trashy.” (Hidden message: Lower-class people are tasteless and unsophisticated.)The most detrimental forms of microaggressions are usually delivered by well-intentioned individuals who are unaware that they have engaged in harmful conduct toward a socially devalued group.
Our racially diverse present (and future) deserves better than tokenism
Be careful when you do try to be inclusive, because if you don’t do it right, you could be guilty of “tokenism.” Somewhere there exists a fine line between making a person of a race other than white enough of that race without being so much of that race that you must certainly be mocking or stereotyping them.
There is nothing wrong with that, in theory – except that it signals to the industry that it’s acceptable to represent the growing racial diversity in American through what advertising executives like to call “ethnic ambiguity”. Minorities featured in advertising, the sentiment goes, shouldn’t look too black or brown, or sound too unassimilated or uneducated; instead, “acceptable” diversity in advertising remains middle class, unassuming and nearly invisible by being as close to “white” as possible. The problem is that, when racial difference is represented in this way, we aren’t actually acknowledging diversity: we are homogenizing it. These diverse-but-not-too-diverse advertisements create a false promise of racially normalized society.
But when you include someone’s ethnic identity, be careful not to include it too much or in any way that might be seen as insulting, because then…racism.
There are a plethora of myths out there about black people, but the question is, which ones are actually true? For years, the black community has been inundated with oxymoronic myths that just continue as the years go on.
7 Racially Coded Phrases That Everyone Needs to Stop Saying About Black People
As well, you must also take care not to use ANY of these phrases, because it’s just another way you’re secretly insulting a minority. (Even when you’re referring to someone who is NOT a minority, although I’m not 100% sure how that works.)
Now, many words act as substitutes for the slur that, more than any other, has come to define race relations in America. These words are united by a hurtful message: Black people don’t deserve to be treated with respect or regarded as fully human.
Whether it’s commentators implying that Michael Brown deserved to die because he was a “thug,” or civic leaders peddling racial welfare stereotypes, coded racial language seeps into mainstream conversations far more than most people assume.
It’s an easy, yet insidious way for the speakers to prompt or stir up an audience’s negative biases against black people.
Individually, these instances might seem insignificant. But taken collectively, the common use of these coded words — words otherwise assumed to be free of any political or historical context — serve to reinforce stereotypes that stem from a sordid history of slavery, segregation and unequal treatment under the law.
White people can’t even MENTION race without getting a smack on the hand for it. Because discussions of race are racism (there’s that ism again) unless the race discuss-er is of the accepted race.
Your Guide to Avoiding Cultural Appropriation
Heaven forbid that you think someone of another ethnicity is cool and try to wear the same things or do your hair the same way. Then, you are guilty of “cultural appropriation.
Cultural appropriation is when white media trivializes and adopts aspects of other cultures without proper recognition, representation and respect. At least, that is how we can currently define it in 2015. Because really, that’s the main issue right now.
Journalists, tv hosts, bloggers, artists, lend me your eyes! I give to you a sure-fire guide on how to avoid cultural appropriation. All you have to do is simply ask yourself these questions before you publish or submit your potentially problematic posts/stories/segments.
You can easily be guilty of cultural appropriation without even knowing it. For example, white people getting a tan is considered by some to be an affront. Those people who go to Jamaica and pay to get beads in their hair? Also offensive. Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches? Racist.
It seems to me that the most marginalized, discriminated against person in America right now is the white male. Because of his so-called “white male privilege” he’s passed over for promotions so that the more politically correct candidate can receive it. Because of his “white male privilege” he has to be even more careful about what he says and how he behaves. Everything about him is vilified.
Why does it have to be like this? Why does there always have to be an enemy? This is the problem with too many “isms” and too much butthurt. The pendulum always has to swing and whack someone else in the head. This just creates a larger divide and stokes the fire under our melting pot of a country until it boils over and makes a mess on the stove.
As parents, we teach our children not to be sore losers and throw the checker board at their opponent’s head when they lose. Unfortunately, that lesson is getting erased through our media and public school system. The odds are rarely all lined up in our favor. Overcoming them is a measure of success. Throwing a hissy fit about those odds is, however, now held up and applauded. If it was a kid, you’d just take the game away until the child could behave.
When I worked in the male-dominated automotive industry, I certainly never wanted a handicap just because I had ovaries. That’s not how you gain respect from your peers. It wasn’t easy to get to the top of my field, but when I did, it wasn’t because I performed poorly but got the job anyway. It was because I deserved it. If you’re busy whining about “microaggressions”, where is your self-respect? Getting ahead despite the odds is far sweeter than a handout to shut you up because you’re a baby.
I know that some folks will read this and say that I don’t understand their struggles. That’s true. I have never been black or Latino or gay or blind. But we ALL have struggles.
When will people stop searching for things to be outraged about? I’m personally outraged by the misplaced outrage. Why not take responsibility and make it impossible for anyone to pass you over because your performance is so incredible? Instead of using butthurt as fuel for your social media whining, why not use it as fuel to excel? Why not use it to propel you to make the world a better place?
You want to even things up in America?
Stop focusing all of your energy on crying the blues and expressing your butthurt. Focus it on making the world better. Be a shining example of your minority or trod-upon group instead of a wailing beacon of warning.
At the risk of sounding like I’m trying to silence people (because I seriously am – I just can’t take it anymore) …
STOP. WHINING.
The post The Great American Butthurt appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.
Racism and race are social constructs with no basis to exist. In fact, even the United Nations, in a 1950 statement, decided to omit the term ‘race’ altogether.
I am sure I am not breaking any news when I say that racism doesn’t exist.
In fact, racism is almost always equated to other words, concepts and ideas in order for people to create a meaning.
According to most dictionaries, racism is “the belief in the superiority of one race over another, which often results in discrimination and prejudice towards people based on their race or ethnicity.”
It is in this and other artificially created definitions that lies the falsehood of racism.
The use of the term “racism” does not easily fit any single definition because in fact there is only one race, the human race. So, to say that someone is racist would be to say that such a person hates all humans.
Racism is an empty construct derived from a classification invented by Carleton S. Coon, in 1962. Coon decided to make up a concept, which he called Race, and later divided humans into 4 major groups according to their ethnicity: white/Caucasian, Mongoloid/Asian, Negroid/Black, and Australoid.
Other than this classification, “there is no universally accepted classification for “race”, however, and its use has been under fire” for decades, precisely because the term race describes homo sapiens with 99.99+% of the same genetic materials. This means that any division made up by scientists or anthropologists is largely subjective.
Mainstream media, especially liberal media, purposely use the word racism to insult people who oppose certain political or social practices, such as taxing, redistribution of wealth via taxation, illegal immigration, the welfare state as well as numerous government imposed policies.
Political correctness, a practice that is also advanced mainly by liberals but also by many conservatives, with the intent of censoring free speech, plays the same role as using the word racism to discount someone’s speech or opinion.
Other concepts that are used to mean the same as racism include prejudice, discrimination, xenophobia and so on, even though concepts like that are completely different from racism.
According to Wikipedia, racism serves as a support for an ideology that seeks to divide humans into groups.
Those groups, the page explains, are organized by racism according to their differences “due to their social behavior and their innate capacities as well as the idea that they can be ranked as inferior or superior.”
In other words, pointing out social, economic or cognitive differences is considered racist. The problem with that is that society is composed of groups of people of different social and economic backgrounds with different levels of cognitive capacity.
Denying that differences of all kinds exist among humans and attempting to prevent people from pointing them out as such, shows a great degree of ignorance. Worse, forcing people not to recognize differences or attempting to make everyone equal, homogeneous, everywhere, is the only recognizable ideological threat to the human race, the only race that exists.
Since racism does not exist, it is often illustrated with acts of violence committed by someone, which are then labeled as racist.
Violence is later equaled to discrimination, xenophobia and prejudice, which are concepts that, different from racism, can be easily illustrated.
People who equal everything to racism most often mean to say that a certain behavior or action towards a person or group of people is a result of discrimination or prejudice against that person or those people because of their ethnicity, social origin, economic and educational background, yet they use the word racism instead.
So-called racism is one of those situations in which a lie is told so often that it eventually becomes truth for many people and once that happens, it becomes nearly impossible for those people to see the truth.
Jorge Ramos, a Mexican news anchor for Univision, refuses to use the term “illegal” next to “immigrants” because he says it is not morally acceptable to say such a thing.
In Ramos’ world, people who enter a country without a valid VISA or who are taken in as refugees – some 30 million in the US alone – are indeed illegals, but they should not be identified with that label, because, according to him, it is morally wrong.
Ramos blames American drug addicts for the ongoing drug epidemy. He says that the drug problem is America’s fault and that illegal aliens are on US soil as a matter of supply and demand.
Other concepts often associated or equaled to racism are segregation and supremacism.
Supremacism is usually associated to white people, thus white supremacy, which is defined as the belief that ‘a particular class of people is superior to others, and that it should dominate, control, and subjugate others.”
Even white supremacy cannot be equated to racism, although it often is. As its definition explains, it is a belief based on class differences, not race.
In sum, racism doesn’t exist because there is only one race, the human race. Humans are different indeed. Society has set a number of concepts to differentiate humans who have different cognitive abilities, social backgrounds, ethnicities and political affiliations.
The desire to prevent obvious differences from being pointed out is in itself anti-human since we were all created and raised differently.
More importantly, racism is equated to xenophobia, segregation, prejudice supremacism and other social and political constructs because it is a concept or idea that cannot be supported by evidence and reason.
The use of the word racism to describe a person who opposes someone else’s views, a certain set of values or standards or someone who has their own educated opinion is, together with political correctness, an attempt to make humans believe that it is in equality where people can find cohesiveness, harmony, and peace, though it is quite the contrary.
It is our religious, political, ideological, ethnic, social and cognitive differences what makes us unique.
People who think differently should be free to do so and hopefully have an argument to support their views. They should also be free to give their opinion without being ostracised.
People who oppose someone else’s point of view, politics, religious beliefs and so on, should be free to show opposition, without violence.
Saying someone is illegal should not be equated to racism. Calling things by their names should not be labeled as racist. Saying a place is a shithole, cannot be equated to racism, especially if the place is in truth a shithole.
Saying people who cross a border illegally are violating the law and are in many cases drug dealers, criminals, rapists and so on isn’t racist, it is factual.
Harboring people who violate immigration laws is not moral, just as it is not immoral to call them illegal aliens.
People who harbor law offenders, especially those who have committed rape, stolen property or dealt drugs, should also be held accountable.
Race and racism are social constructs with no basis to exist. In fact, even the United Nations, in a 1950 statement, decided to omit the term ‘race’ altogether and instead it decided to classify humans into “ethnic groups”, which more accurately represents society, although it is only based on one characteristic: culture.
The post Racism Doesn’t Exist appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.
For those obsessed with identity politics, their ignorance or self-imposed amnesia of their own heritage is so profound that few honest historians dare correct the record, less they become ostracized from the towers of higher learning. The void created by this lack of integrity requires that those not attached or bound to the anti-intellectual centers of propaganda education must carry the message to others who have an open mind and a sincere desire to know the truth. While Democratic factions adopted during the reconstruction era may seem harsh to the culturally deprived, but compared to the ostentation of self-proclaimed champions for diversity, becomes pale by contrast. Their hypocrisy is not new, but the extent of their neurosis approaches clinical insanity.
The background of the Ku Klux Klan has been distorted to such a degree that the impact of Abraham Lincoln’s war is lost to most Americans. The myth that slavery was the cause of the conflict is amiss. The carpetbaggers were more egregious than the plantation landlords. Thus far the tale of separate societies neglects to face up to the reality of the era. Some aspects were a natural response to the oppression from the victor, while others were an overreach to maintain an economic system that ran its course.
Truth Wiki provides some seldom cited Historical facts most Americans don’t know about the KKK.
Now before one draws a false conclusion, the Republican Party was never the advocate of equality that many would like you to believe. By supporting Amendments to the Constitution the GOP intended to bury the South with the ballot box, while stripping the assets from the vanquished.
The diversion of race baiting has been a stable ever since.
The Democratic Party’s Long History of Racism that appeared in the American Thinker cites Charlie Martin of PJ Tatler, who factually exposes the Democrats as the real racists.
A few examples:
Woodrow Wilson segregated Federal Buildings and jobs after 50 years of integration under largely Republican administrations.
It was the Democrat Party in the South that instituted Jim Crow Laws.
It was the Democrat Party in the South that instituted “separate but equal”.
This background is off limits in the swamp of political warfare that is covered by a mass media and pushes the narrative that descendants of bondage are entitled to reparations for past enslavement. It would be even more horrendous to mention that Since White people are routinely condemned for 200 years of slavery in America, why are Jews not condemned for their leading role in slave trade over the last 2000 years? Add to the insult that David Duke presents the factual evidence to this sordid history and you are automatically labeled a hater.
The timid and phony “so called” conservatives are far too scared to mention this subject in their political discourse. Many of the next items need to become part of the dialogue.
Back in 2015 an article Why Not Just Ban Democratic Party For Its Links to Racism?, cites the following: “Founded in 1866 as a Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every Southern state, launching a ‘reign of terror‘ against Republican leaders black and white,” noted historian Eric Foner wrote in his book Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution.
The inference is that “The data is going to indicate sadly that when the Obama administration is over, black people will have lost ground in every single leading economic indicator category,” Tavis Smiley, a black radio host, said. “On that regard, the president ought to be held responsible.”
Even that proclaimed liberal enlightened publication, The Atlantic acknowledges How Barack Obama Failed Black Americans. Shocking that such a megastar boy of Frank Marshall Davis could neglect his race.
But before one forgets the rapid destruction of the black community, one needs to admit HOW THE LIBERAL WELFARE STATE DESTROYED BLACK AMERICA. LBJ shackled the gullible into believing that the Great Society was a step forward. More black lives were destroyed by liberal legislation than by any KKK lynching.
America needs to grow up and face reality. Charles Hunt of the Washington Times has it correct when reporting on the ugly career of Nancy Pelosi, Democrats decry the KKK while forgetting legacy of one of their own.
“There is no room for celebrating the violent bigotry of the men of the Confederacy in the hallowed halls of the United States Capitol or in places of honor across the country,” Mrs. Pelosi said.
After, apparently, 30 years of herself celebrating “violent bigotry.”
In this land of dishonest race hucksters, it is always important to remember that small lies never win. They always go for the BIG LIE.
Remind me, again, who was behind all the “violent bigotry” of the Civil War? Oh, yeah, it was Democrats. And who was behind all the vestiges of it over the last century? Democrats.
Mrs. Pelosi knows this, of course, because she worked shoulder-to-shoulder for 23 years beside a retired member of the Ku Klux Klan. That would, of course, be the “great senator” from the “great state” of West Virginia, Robert C. Byrd, a lifelong Democrat.
As the “Exalted Cyclops” of the KKK, Mr. Byrd recruited more than 100 people to join his chapter and warned in a letter against America becoming “degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”
Modern-day Democrats denounced Byrd in 1989 by naming the suite of offices in the U.S. Capitol that house Democrat leadership the “Robert C. Byrd Rooms.”
Since you were not shocked by the hidden family ties of Barry Soetoro, maybe the discriminating sentiments of Senator Byrd might strike a chord of horse sense for those who reject the “political correctness” of the multicultural asylum.
The current diversified egalitarian culture is based upon a foundation of rigid orthodoxy. By adopting the Abraham Lincoln illusion as The Great Emancipator, he was almost the Great Colonizer. This intention is conveniently ignored as the guilt ridden apologists sink into a state of delusion.
In the book, Lincoln sought to deport freed slaves the shocking account is discussed.
“Just after he issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, Lincoln authorized plans to pursue a freedmen’s settlement in present-day Belize and another in Guyana, both colonial possessions of Great Britain at the time, said Phillip W. Magness, one of the researchers who uncovered the new documents.”
The legacy of the KKK must not be defined by the Southern Poverty Law Center. J D Heyes cites the Family Research Council in the article, The Southern Poverty Law Center Is A Dangerous, Demented Hate Group That Incites Murder Against Christians And Conservatives.
Media Research Center President Brent Bozell, published an open letter to the news media explaining why they should cease referencing the leftist SPLC’s biased propaganda in their reporting.
“The SPLC is a discredited, left-wing, political activist organization that seeks to silence its political opponents with a ‘hate group’ label of its own invention and application that is not only false and defamatory, but that also endangers the lives of those targeted with it,” the letter stated.
In the toxic political environment of this new century, the role of the top haters is unquestionably achieved by the progressive extremists that seek to destroy all symbols and remnants of traditional heritage. The lunatic left project on the public continuous diatribes of slime, deception and literal hate.
Demanding the purity of censorship does not mean they wear white sheets or hoods. The radicals who captured the Democratic Party are the modern day mob of venom that can trace their roots to the Saul Alinsky School of chaos.
For the masses of the underclass, who are duped into believing that the Trump Nation patriots are their enemy; wake up and gaze into the eyes of the progressives who have been deceiving you for generations. The tech billionaires are committed to the suppression of the truth. Their claims that they favor your advancement are a sham. So just who are the real facilitators of a free society?
The post KKK Then and Now appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.
An assistant police chief who was being investigated for ties to pedophilia, resigned after private Facebook messages were made public that outed him as a racist.
This report was originally published by Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge
It has been five months since James Damore was fired from his job as an engineer at Google after posting a memo to an internal message board that criticized the company’s diversity policies for ignoring differences between the sexes (and daring to use facts to back up his statements on the differences between the sexes).
And now, amid the ever-escalating identity politics of the new normal America, TechCrunch reports Damore, along with another former Google engineer named David Gudeman, who spent three years with Google, working on a query engine, has filed a class action lawsuit against the company in Santa Clara Superior Court in Northern California.
His claims: that Google unfairly discriminates against white, conservative men.
The lawsuit, filed by Dhillon Law Group, says it aims to represent all employees of Google who’ve been discriminated against due to their “perceived conservative political views by Google,” due to “their male gender by Google” and “due to their Caucasian race by Google.”
TechCrunch notes that Damore isn’t holding back any punches here.
According to his filing, Google employs “illegal hiring quotas to fill its desired percentages of women and favored minority candidates, and openly shames managers of business units who fail to meet their quotas—in the process, openly denigrating male and Caucasian employees as less favored than others.”
The suit also claims that “numerical presence of women celebrated at Google” was based “solely due to their gender” while the “presence of Caucasians and males was mocked with ‘boos’ during companywide weekly meetings.”
Damore vs Google Class Action Lawsuit by zerohedge on Scribd
Identity Politics has responded with outrage against People Magazine’s choice of white male country singer Blake Shelton as “sexiest man in the world.”
According to adherents of Identity Politics, the choice indicates that People Magazine is itself racist and part of the white supremacy movement to elavate white people above people of color.
The choice is doubly outrageous because, according to a writer in Salon, it reinforces and celebrates toxic white male sexuality and elevates a white man to a position of popular acclaim.
Every white person needs to read this article — http://www.unz.com/article/the-end-of-white-celebrity/— to understand how they are being demonized and marginalized to the point of oblivion.
By focusing primarily on white heterosexual males, Identity Politics tries to split white women off from white men by the use of the pejorative “misogynist”, but, as the article reports, white women, such as Taylor Swift, are also publicly demonized for their whiteness.
Reading this article in The Unz Review reminded me of an article I read last November in a Texas university newspaper that declared white DNA to be an abomination. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/30/texas-student-newspaper-blasted-over-anti-white-your-dna-is-abomination-column.html
Think about this for a minute. Suppose the writer had said “homosexual DNA is an abomination,” or “black DNA is an abomination,” or, heaven forbid, “Jewish DNA is an abomination.” Anyone who declared homosexuals, blacks, or Jews to be an abomination would be instantly fired, sued, charged with hate crimes and driven so deep into the ground that they would never reemerge.
The article in the student newspaper was a bit too much for Texas and produced a furor of its own. Lost in the furor was the realization that the writer was correctly interpreting the Identity Politics that today defines the liberal/progressive/left.
Hillary Clinton herself expressed Identity Politics when she declared Americans who rejected her as president to be “deplorables.” CounterPunch printed an essay by its radio host that concluded Trump’s election was not legitimate because he was elected by racist, sexist, homophobic white male Trump deplorables.
In other words, Identity Politics cannot be dismissed as some sort of idiocy on the part of a few kooks. It is institutionalized in American politics and culture and is becoming a habitual way of thinking. The growing demonization of white people parallels the demonization of the Jews and can result in marginalization and physical destruction.
The immigration policies of white countries have created a diversity basis for ganging up on whites. If we put together a diverse population with the anti-white ideology of Identity Politics, we have a political and cultural trap for white people.
It seems paradoxical that Identity Politics is led by white/liberal/progressive/leftists advocating their own marginalization.
However, as it is a correct conclusion from Identity Politics that white DNA is an abomination, white adherants of the ideology can logically see their demise as a benefit to humanity. But why should they be allowed to condemn whites who do not see themselves as an abomination?
What we are seeing unfold with Identity Politics was foretold by Jean Raspail in his futuristic novel The Camp of the Saints. Perhaps white people should read it as an indication of their possible fate.
Another day, another piece of evidence that points to the stunning fact that the mainstream media is willing to spread complete disinformation on a daily basis in their desperate, never ending attempt to hurt President Trump.
The latest example comes in the form of a pathetic hit piece in The Daily Mail that claims that former White House Intern Jack Breuer used a racist hand gesture in a November photo op with the president and fellow interns.
The problem? Breuer isn’t actually a white supremacist and was flashing the ‘OK’ hand gesture that the president and others have used in the past. Keep in mind that the ADL itself has already confirmed this is NOT a racist hand symbol.
The Daily Mail report breathlessly reads:
A former White House intern is coming under fire after flashing a known ‘white power’ sign during a photo-op with President Donald Trump.
[…]
It is the same sign that white nationalist Richard Spencer gave on the steps of the Trump International Hotel on election night and that right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos posed with in front of the White House.
It was also seen at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August – the same day an alleged Nazi sympathizer accelerated his car into anti-protesters, killing one and injuring several others.
All those surrounding Breuer on the right side of the picture are using their left hands to give their thumbs-up, with him standing out by using his right hand.
The gesture – which only makes sense if made with the right hand, although there are examples of people making it with their left hand – is said to depict the letter ‘W’ with the outstretched middle, ring and little fingers, and a ‘P’ with the circle made by the thumb and forefinger stretching down to the wrist. Together ‘WP’ stands for White Power.
As Paul Joseph Watson rightfully noted, the hand gesture has nothing to do with racism even if actual white supremacists have used it in the past.
Unfortunately for the Daily Mail, allegations that the hand symbol, which actually represents “OK,” equates to white supremacy were debunked by none other than the ADL in May of this year.
“Has the simple thumb-and-forefinger ‘OK’ hand gesture become a white supremacist hand sign? Well, no, it hasn’t, but you are likely to hear just the opposite from social media, thanks to the latest hoax from members of notorious website 4chan,” the ADL said.
Breuer, who released a statement on Twitter Thursday evening, also called the allegations unfounded.
In some of our intern pictures, I emulated the OK sign the President sometimes makes. That was foolish. I should have listened more closely to the Commander-in-Chief and given the thumbs up. (1/2)
— Jack Breuer (@jjbreue) December 29, 2017
I’m proud of my Jewish heritage and strongly reject the hateful views associated with racist white power organizations. I would never make common cause with them. (2/2)
— Jack Breuer (@jjbreue) December 29, 2017
Despite the fact that the claims in the Daily Mail article have been fully debunked, the news outlet has so far refused to correct or take down the fake news report, instead spreading it to tens of thousands of readers, many who are only too happy to believe literally anything negative about the Trump White House.
As Trump himself has noted many times, the establishment media readily spreads fake news on a daily basis and the vast majority are openly working against him.
This is simply one more example.
Two liberal professors from San Diego State University are now claiming that the existence of farmers markets in urban areas, outside the control of corporations, is racist and normalizes the eating habits of white people.
Pascale Joassart-Marcelli and Fernando J Bosco made the insane claims in a chapter of a new anthology released this month that “researches” the correlation between how white a specific farmers market supposedly is and the gentrification in said area.
As Campus Reform notes, “The anthology, which features contributions from a variety of professors, aims to highlight the harms of “environmental gentrification,” a process in which “environmental improvements lead to…the displacement of long-term residents.”
The Washington Times also reported on this hardcore liberal insanity:
“Farmers’ markets are often white spaces where the food consumption habits of white people are normalized,” the SDSU professors write, the education watchdog Campus Reform reported Wednesday.
The geology professors claim that 44 percent of San Diego’s farmers’ markets cater to “households from higher socio-economic backgrounds,” which raises property values and “[displaces] low-income residents and people of color.”
“The most insidious part of this gentrification process is that alternative food initiatives work against the community activists and residents who first mobilized to fight environmental injustices and provide these amenities but have significantly less political and economic clout than developers and real estate professionals,” the academics write.
The authors claim that negative externalities of “white habitus” formed at farmers’ markets can be managed through “inclusive steps that balance new initiatives and neighborhood stability to make cities ‘just green enough.’”
One has to wonder what is actually going through the minds of the two professors as they attempted to write a serious research chapter on how terrible it is that white people shop at farmers markets.
Campus Reform continued:
The professors stop short of offering specific remedies, but do conclude that “curbing gentrification is a vexing task” that requires the involvement of both community members and local governments.
“Strong community involvement,” they say, is necessary in order to ensure that “the needs of the poorest…residents are prioritized,” while local governments can enact “equitable zoning policies, rent-control laws, and property tax reforms in favor of long-time homeowners” to combat the trend toward gentrification.
“Ultimately,” they conclude, countering gentrification “requires slow and inclusive steps that balance new initiatives and neighborhood stability to make cities ‘just green enough.’”
Keep in mind this is simply another transparent example of the hard-lefts now public attack on all things white, a strategy being paid for by the likes of George Soros in order to keep the population divided and fixated on each other rather than actually targeting the real power structure.
Whether it be a panel of liberal speakers taking aim at the very idea of white womanhood simply because a percentage of white women didn’t vote for the Democrat in Alabama or a women being attacked in a Brooklyn deli because she was assumed to be a Trump supporter, this sort of reverse racism is increasing and, as noted above, will only serve to help the agenda of the true powers that be.
In yet another round of you can’t make this up stuff up hard-left insanity, a liberal writer from Seattle has published an adult coloring book that ridicules white people for their perceived slights against the leftist orthodoxy and unchecked “white privilege” that allows them to vote for someone like Donald Trump.
Author Jim Corbett apparently wrote the book out of frustration (see Trump Derangement Syndrome) with what he was seeing on TV in relation to a wide variety of leftist causes including white privilege, the sham Russian/Trump collusion investigation, censoring conservatives on college campuses, and kneeling during the National Anthem.
“It came completely out of me screaming at my TV, and the way the GOP is taking the country off in a totally different direction,” Corbett told USA Today.
The paper reported:
Corbett and Tim Jones (another white guy) wrote the text; the 27 illustrations were done by veteran artist (and African-American) Steve Hartley. The coloring book is available online at Amazon for $10; Corbett says 10 percent of the profits are being donated to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
“For us, this is a humorous coping mechanism. I am very frustrated and sad,” Corbett says. “But we want to make sure people understand this is not a vehicle of intolerance or hate. We are not trying to get people to hate white guys. We need people to have good coping mechanisms.”
He’s had firsthand experience with agitated white guys: Corbett went to Marist College in Poughkeepsie with conservative commentator Bill O’Reilly.
“I knew who he was. He was a loud-mouth even back then and went professional with it. Nobody could empty a room quicker than him.”
The author then went out to gleefully paint himself as the exact pathetic caricature of a left-wing white guy hating himself to please his parties identity politics driven mindset.
Corbett says the angry white guys don’t realize their advantages.
“You may have lost a battle here or there, but it’s not institutional racism or sexism that you have to deal with.
“Look, I’m a white guy; there’s a lot of white guys like me and this idea of white privilege is a real thing,” he says.
For example, he remembered getting in trouble as a young man and having his parents show up to smooth things over with police.
“I have been a beneficiary of white privilege and gotten in trouble for stupid things. If the same thing had happened to a couple of black kids it would have been different.”
The color book comes amid an increasingly anti-white sentiment coming from the hard-left in recent weeks in what is obviously yet another divide and conquer tactic to keep the population from uniting against those that actually run the world.
Whether it be a panel of liberal speakers taking aim at the very idea of white womanhood simply because a percentage of white women didn’t vote for the Democrat in Alabama or a women being attacked in a Brooklyn deli because she was assumed to be a Trump supporter, this sort of reverse racism is increasing and, as noted above, will only serve to help the agenda of the true powers that be.
In yet another example of the insanity that is hard-left identity politics, a liberal black journalist has written an article in which she declares that Charlie Rose and other white abusers were racist because they didn’t sexually harass black women in the workplace.
That’s right, liberals are now actually arguing with each other over who the bigger victim is, even as most of the country looks on it shock at how insane one has to be to actually be angry that they were not sexually harassed while attempting to make the story not about the actual victims but about oneself.
The journalist, Esquire’s Rebecca Carroll, began her piece by describing her experience working for Charlie Rose in the late 90’s before pivoting into said insanity.
In 1997, I joined the production team of Charlie Rose’s popular interview show. I was the only black journalist on staff. At the time, there was little to no recognition of what it meant to be black and female in a workplace dominated by white men.
Twenty years later, in this watershed moment of examination and reckoning as one powerful white man after another is disgraced following allegations of sexual misconduct ranging from harassment to assault, we’re still not talking about the ramifications for black women—or the broader connection to structural racism in America.
Charlie Rose’s show, a news program celebrating the art of the conversation, seemed like a perfect fit for me. I wasn’t a classically trained journalist or broadcast producer, but at 27 years old I’d published three interview-based books about race in America with a major publishing house.
At Hampshire College, the private liberal arts school known for its alternative curriculum, I had found my way to the Studs Terkel model of journalism: conversations as a way to tell stories.
That’s right, according to Carroll, the story isn’t about the victims of Rose’s harassment (who all happened to be white) but rather it is about “structural racism” and the terrible fact that Rose didn’t target women of color for said harassment.
As I’ve been prone to say lately, you truly can’t make this stuff up.
In the nearly two years I worked for the show, a mere fraction of the guests were black—more than one of whom told me in confidence after their appearance that they’d found Charlie’s tone condescending and dismissive.
This was the infrastructure of the show: All the valuable, sought-after guests were white—a common occurrence across media platforms.
And while many of us on staff were subject to Charlie’s unsolicited shoulder massages and physical intimidation, as he towered above us at a height over six feet tall, the women Charlie preferred and preyed upon—at least that I witnessed—were white. It was an environment that all but erased me, while simultaneously exploiting me as a black woman.
Yes, you read that correctly. Carroll is actually ranting about being “erased” from the environment because she wasn’t a victim of the bosses sexual harassment.
Unbelievable.
Carroll then attempted a slight backtrack from her transparent insanity but it too completely failed.
To be clear, I’m not suggesting it would have been preferable for Charlie to have preyed upon me, too—but rather, his sexualization of white women was a manifestation of gendered power dynamics in the same way that his not sexualizing me was an expression of racialized power dynamics.
To be clear, Carroll literally just implied that it was racist for Charlie not to prey on her and then immediately after (in the same article) tried to debunk herself.
This is the height of hard-left insanity folks!
Another day, another piece of news pointing to the now strikingly obvious fact that the hard-left is attempting to further divide the country along racial lines while painting anyone that disagrees with their liberal views as racist.
Appearing on the Sirius XM Progress Channel’s Make It Plain, three organizers of the anti-Trump “Women’s March” spoke about the need to confront white womanhood itself while attacking any white person who didn’t vote for anti-gun Democrat Doug Jones in the recent Alabama Senate election.
“More white women voted percentage wise for Roy Moore than did for Donald Trump,” the panel’s host breathlessly claims. “So this is why this is such an urgent conversation, such an urgent panel to have quite frankly.”
As Infowars.com noted, “The panel largely centered around making white women feel guilty for their alleged complicity in upholding white supremacy.”
One of the organizers, Sophie Ellman-Golan, shared a graphic on her Twitter account that shows the percentage of white women who voted for Roy Moore over Democrat Doug Jones. The fact that a majority of white women did not support Jones is apparently enough evidence for Golan that they simply had to be racist.
#ConfrontWhiteWomanhood pic.twitter.com/D51WGwV9er
— Sophie Ellman-Golan (@EgSophie) December 13, 2017
Ellman-Golan made it clear that the left now believes that if a white women votes for a Republican then she is straight up racist and if a white women “conforms” to the liberal orthodoxy she is only “inherently racist” but at least trying to fight it.
“We designed this obviously to work directly with, specifically with white women, but I think also in this particular setting it’s really valuable to have multiple voices talking about both because it’s obviously for white women to confront our own complicity in upholding white supremacy, but it’s not like white women’s voices are, or should be the only voices talking about the ways that white women cause harm and violence,” Ellman-Golan said during the discussion.
That’s right, in the new America, white people are not even allowed to vote for their favored candidate without the fear of being labeled a racist.
Shockingly, this is the third time in the last week that the left has specifically attacked Americans based on their skin color in what is sadly becoming a routine, mainstream media supported, theme.
As I reported for this website, just two days ago a women was attacked and robbed at a Brooklyn area deli by two Hispanic teens who targeted her because she was white and therefore a likely Trump supporter. (she was not)
“A 32-year-old liberal white woman was attacked and robbed by two Hispanic teens who accused the woman of being a Trump supporter while pelting her with groceries at a Bronx area deli Wednesday night.
Amazingly, the woman is not actually a Trump supporter and was apparently attacked as one simply because she was white. Keep in mind that the left has specifically blamed white people for Trump’s election victory so one can imagine that the teens were simply carrying out an attack they thought was for the greater good.”
One day earlier literally tens of thousands of liberals throughout social media, including many “prominent” leftists, used Doug Jones stunning victory in Alabama to attack white people as a whole.
“In the new America, the hard-left openly mocks and insults all white people simply because a certain percentage of them do not vote for liberal candidates,” I reported, again for SHTFplan.com.
“Keep in mind that BOTH candidates were white yet that did not stop the race baiting left from conducting a vile series of attacks on the white race while pretending that they are the actual civil rights heroes.”
Make no mistake, this is a Soros-funded, globalist operation to scare white Americans into supporting ONLY liberal candidates or take the risk of being viciously attacked as a racist.
All Americans must stand up to this transparent divide and conquer strategy or risk an all out civil war.
A university was just forced by offended students to apologize for calling the snow that falls from the sky "white." Seriously.
Immediately following the stunning victory by Democrat Doug Jones in the Alabama Senate race, liberals, including many “prominent” leftists, took to social media to attack white people as a whole over the fact that some whites voted against the pro gun-control former prosecutor.
That’s right, in the new America, the hard-left openly mocks and insults all white people simply because a certain percentage of them do not vote for liberal candidates.
Keep in mind that BOTH candidates were white yet that did not stop the race baiting left from conducting a vile series of attacks on the white race while pretending that they are the civil rights heroes.
As I’ve been prone to say lately, you truly cannot make this stuff up.
Filmmaker and noted anti-Trump propagandist Michael Moore got into the action early, tweeting out an image that attacked white people over the fact that 63% of white women and 72% of white men had voted for Roy Moore in Alabama.
Dear White People… pic.twitter.com/Y5eWxD0FX1
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) December 13, 2017
As Paul Joseph Watson noted, MSNBC, CNN and Huffington Post contributor Kevin Allred continued the attacks on white people during an unhinged rant that literally cursed at white people over and over again.
Imagine owning a brain that produces this. pic.twitter.com/w4RUa45LTs
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) December 13, 2017
A communications director for a Democrat in the House specifically took aim at white men who committed the horrific crime of voting for their preferred candidate.
so…I wanna re-emphasize something. White people strongly supported Roy Moore. Let’s take that, internalize it, and not let ourselves pretend that we don’t have a problem. White men especially.
— Dante Atkins (@DanteAtkins) December 13, 2017
Another prominent liberal flat out rallied against the fact that there are a large amount of white people in America itself.
black people are turning out in higher numbers than 2014. white turnout it down. the problem here, as everywhere in america, is that there still may be too many white people.
— Noah Berlatsky (@nberlat) December 13, 2017
Independent journalist Chris Menahan, writing for Information Liberation, also took screenshots of at least a dozen liberal voters attacking the very existence of the white race. Remember, this is being cheered on by liberals in this country who hold actual power.
From calling all white people stupid, to claiming that only minorities should be allowed to vote, the tweets compiled by Menahan paint a clear picture of what at least part of the hard-left truly believes.
Make no mistake, this is a direct attempt at forcing white people across the country to vote liberal over the fear that they might be labeled racist. This is obviously an absolutely disgusting political move by the left that the American people will hopefully see right through.
With that being said, it does not change the fact that the Democratic Party is now openly attacking any white person who does not vote for them.
