Showing posts with label race. Show all posts
Showing posts with label race. Show all posts

Monday, January 29, 2018

Racism Doesn’t Exist

Racism Doesn’t Exist | Race | Sleuth Journal Society Special Interests US News World News


Racism and race are social constructs with no basis to exist. In fact, even the United Nations, in a 1950 statement, decided to omit the term ‘race’ altogether.


I am sure I am not breaking any news when I say that racism doesn’t exist.


In fact, racism is almost always equated to other words, concepts and ideas in order for people to create a meaning.


According to most dictionaries, racism is “the belief in the superiority of one race over another, which often results in discrimination and prejudice towards people based on their race or ethnicity.”


It is in this and other artificially created definitions that lies the falsehood of racism.


Racism: A socially constructed concept 


The use of the term “racism” does not easily fit any single definition because in fact there is only one race, the human race. So, to say that someone is racist would be to say that such a person hates all humans.


Racism is an empty construct derived from a classification invented by Carleton S. Coon, in 1962. Coon decided to make up a concept, which he called Race, and later divided humans into 4 major groups according to their ethnicity: white/Caucasian, Mongoloid/Asian, Negroid/Black, and Australoid.


Other than this classification, “there is no universally accepted classification for “race”, however, and its use has been under fire” for decades, precisely because the term race describes homo sapiens with 99.99+% of the same genetic materials. This means that any division made up by scientists or anthropologists is largely subjective.


Mainstream media, especially liberal media, purposely use the word racism to insult people who oppose certain political or social practices, such as taxing, redistribution of wealth via taxation, illegal immigration, the welfare state as well as numerous government imposed policies.


Political correctness, a practice that is also advanced mainly by liberals but also by many conservatives, with the intent of censoring free speech, plays the same role as using the word racism to discount someone’s speech or opinion.


Other concepts that are used to mean the same as racism include prejudice, discrimination, xenophobia and so on, even though concepts like that are completely different from racism.


There is only one race


According to Wikipedia, racism serves as a support for an ideology that seeks to divide humans into groups.


Those groups, the page explains, are organized by racism according to their differences “due to their social behavior and their innate capacities as well as the idea that they can be ranked as inferior or superior.”


In other words, pointing out social, economic or cognitive differences is considered racist. The problem with that is that society is composed of groups of people of different social and economic backgrounds with different levels of cognitive capacity.


Denying that differences of all kinds exist among humans and attempting to prevent people from pointing them out as such, shows a great degree of ignorance. Worse, forcing people not to recognize differences or attempting to make everyone equal, homogeneous, everywhere, is the only recognizable ideological threat to the human race, the only race that exists.


Since racism does not exist, it is often illustrated with acts of violence committed by someone, which are then labeled as racist.


Violence is later equaled to discrimination, xenophobia and prejudice, which are concepts that, different from racism, can be easily illustrated.


People who equal everything to racism most often mean to say that a certain behavior or action towards a person or group of people is a result of discrimination or prejudice against that person or those people because of their ethnicity, social origin, economic and educational background, yet they use the word racism instead.


You can tell the same lie a thousand times, but it never gets any truer


So-called racism is one of those situations in which a lie is told so often that it eventually becomes truth for many people and once that happens, it becomes nearly impossible for those people to see the truth.


Jorge Ramos, a Mexican news anchor for Univision, refuses to use the term “illegal” next to “immigrants” because he says it is not morally acceptable to say such a thing.


In Ramos’ world, people who enter a country without a valid VISA or who are taken in as refugees – some 30 million in the US alone – are indeed illegals, but they should not be identified with that label, because, according to him, it is morally wrong.


Ramos blames American drug addicts for the ongoing drug epidemy. He says that the drug problem is America’s fault and that illegal aliens are on US soil as a matter of supply and demand.


Other concepts often associated or equaled to racism are segregation and supremacism.


Supremacism is usually associated to white people, thus white supremacy, which is defined as the belief that ‘a particular class of people is superior to others, and that it should dominate, control, and subjugate others.”


Even white supremacy cannot be equated to racism, although it often is. As its definition explains, it is a belief based on class differences, not race.


Final Thoughts


In sum, racism doesn’t exist because there is only one race, the human race. Humans are different indeed. Society has set a number of concepts to differentiate humans who have different cognitive abilities, social backgrounds, ethnicities and political affiliations.


The desire to prevent obvious differences from being pointed out is in itself anti-human since we were all created and raised differently.


More importantly, racism is equated to xenophobia, segregation, prejudice supremacism and other social and political constructs because it is a concept or idea that cannot be supported by evidence and reason.


The use of the word racism to describe a person who opposes someone else’s views, a certain set of values or standards or someone who has their own educated opinion is, together with political correctness, an attempt to make humans believe that it is in equality where people can find cohesiveness, harmony, and peace, though it is quite the contrary.


It is our religious, political, ideological, ethnic, social and cognitive differences what makes us unique.


People who think differently should be free to do so and hopefully have an argument to support their views. They should also be free to give their opinion without being ostracised.


People who oppose someone else’s point of view, politics, religious beliefs and so on, should be free to show opposition, without violence.


Saying someone is illegal should not be equated to racism. Calling things by their names should not be labeled as racist. Saying a place is a shithole, cannot be equated to racism, especially if the place is in truth a shithole.


Saying people who cross a border illegally are violating the law and are in many cases drug dealers, criminals, rapists and so on isn’t racist, it is factual.


Harboring people who violate immigration laws is not moral, just as it is not immoral to call them illegal aliens.


People who harbor law offenders, especially those who have committed rape, stolen property or dealt drugs, should also be held accountable.


Race and racism are social constructs with no basis to exist. In fact, even the United Nations, in a 1950 statement, decided to omit the term ‘race’ altogether and instead it decided to classify humans into “ethnic groups”, which more accurately represents society, although it is only based on one characteristic: culture.


The post Racism Doesn’t Exist appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Wednesday, August 23, 2017

The Modern Definition of a Hater =Tell the Truth (VIDEO)

The Modern Definition of a Hater =Tell the Truth (VIDEO) | truth | Faith Multimedia US News



“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act!”-George Orwell



What a last couple of weeks it has been, America!


The Communists are doing their best to stir up domestic insurrection from Charlottesville to the tearing down of national statutes.


Our neutered, stand-by president posted the following on Twitter:




“Sad to see the history and culture of our great country being ripped apart with the removal of our beautiful statutes and monuments.”


“…Can’t change history, but you can learn from it. Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson- who’s next, Washington, Jefferson? So foolish.”


…the beauty is being taken out of our cities, towns and parks will be greatly missed and never able to be comparably replaced!”


Wow, the former plant and foreign criminal Barack Hussein Obama is being pointed to as the responsible party for the present turmoil while the current president acts as if he is not the Commander and Chief.



All the while, the media is keeping you diverted from the statue of KKK member Robert Byrd and friend of Hillary Clinton which stands in the halls of Congress, and Vladimir Lenin’s statute in Seattle, Washington.


They are telling on themselves America.



And to think that these people are busy at work calling you law-abiding American citizens everything in the book from haters to right wing extremists to racists, which is a word create by Leon Trotsky under the murderous regime of Joseph Stalin to brow beat those who stood against their lawlessness (Revelation 12:10).


All the while, they are accusing you of what they are guilty of!


Just ask propaganda minister under Adolph Hitler, Joseph Goebbels.


“Accuse the other side of which you are guilty.”


Let me tell you from firsthand experience as to how this works from engaging in thousands of speaking events: High school assemblies, colleges, tea parties, radio, television etc.


They are attempting to demonize (Luke 23:1) anyone that tells the truth, which exposes them for who they are (John 15:22).


What Americans are not paying attention to is that the fact that they are now dealing with what the school system in this country has raised up! (Luke 7:35)



In speaking to high school assemblies across the country, I would take the time to show them their history while teaching them the Constitution of the United States.



I was kicked out of a high school for exposing the murder of the innocent (Proverbs 6:17), namely, the abortion industries trail of blood money.



I was kicked out of a high school for simply bringing the message to Florida’s immoral and indoctrinated school system.



All the while, they were rewarding me “evil for good, and hatred for my love” (Psalm 109:5).


Jesus said, “These things I command you, that ye love one another.  If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you” (John 15:12-13).


And boy, oh boy, do they hate! Since when did hate ever tell the truth? Love does that.


Remember Cain and Abel?


“Therefore we are not to be as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.  Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you.” -1 John 3:12-13


We have been commanded to love our brethren…


“Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him.” -Leviticus 19:7


Remember what 2 Chronicles 19:10 says?


“And what cause soever shall come to you of your brethren that dwell in their cities, between blood and blood, between law and commandment, statutes and judgments, ye shall even warn them that they trespass not against the LORD, and so wrath come upon you, and upon your brethren: this do, and ye shall not trespass.”


Why do they hate the Christians?


Jesus said, “The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.” (John 7:7)


We know that God is love (1 John 4:8).


And we know that love rejoiceth not in iniquity, which is lawlessness (1 John 3:4; 1 Corinthians 13:6).


In Romans 12:9, it tells us to,


“Let love be without dissimulation (a hiding under a false appearance). Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good.”


And why?


Because love works no ill (Romans 13:10), and it owes our brothers and sisters the truth which makes men free (John 8:32).


You see, “Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment.  And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” (Matthew 22:37-40)


Nor are we to,


“Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.  For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.  Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.” (Romans 13:8-10)


So, when they speak out against God’s truth, know then and there that you are dealing with those who do not understand love.


“And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” -Revelation 12:17


Ending on a positive, while the media is doing its best to demonize American Christian patriots, what is it the students in the high schools got out of my message?



This is why the enemy within is attacking.  Because the truth, like a lion, will not only defend itself (Matthew 16:17-19), but it will also take to the enemy’s territory to dispossess (Exodus 23).


Then again, who is asking for permission from the devil to obey The Lord? (Isaiah 56)




What the establishment does not want you to see.


Order online… My War Documentary Series DVD

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

We Cannot Condemn The Violence In Charlottesville Strongly Enough

We Cannot Condemn The Violence In Charlottesville Strongly Enough | Heather-Heyer | Protestors & Activists Special Interests US News


What just happened in Charlottesville, Virginia should break all of our hearts. This is not what our country is about, and I am really struggling to find words that are strong enough to denounce the violence that we just witnessed. Hating people because of the color of their skin is evil. I know that a lot of people are trying to put a political spin on what happened in Charlottesville, but the truth is that it had absolutely nothing to do with normal political discourse. A very, very small group of people that are filled with hate have been trying to draw attention to themselves, and now thanks to a senseless act of violence the eyes of the entire world are on them. The rest of us need to join together to strongly denounce them, because their kind of hate has no place in our society. 


Many of you already know that I attended school in Charlottesville. I have a B.S. in Commerce from the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia, and I absolutely loved my time there. There is nothing like Charlottesville on a crisp autumn day, and I will always remember my long strolls along The Lawn. Without a doubt, I will always love UVA and the friendships that I made there will stay with me for the rest of my life.


So it deeply angers me that a very small hate-filled group of racists is dragging the name of my beloved Charlottesville through the mud. Now, instead of being known for all of the wonderful things it should be known for, Charlottesville will primarily be known for one unspeakably evil violent act




In Charlottesville, Heather Heyer, 32, was killed and 19 other people were injured when a car plowed into a group of counterprotesters.


Two state police officers also died when their helicopter crashed near town while they were trying to assist in the city Thomas Jefferson called home.



The word “demonic” definitely fits what took place, and my hope is that the entire nation will so loudly condemn what happened that it will greatly discourage any similar racial violence in the future. And fortunately, prominent leaders all over the country are already denouncing this senseless violence in extremely strong terms. For example, Pastor Darrell Scott posted the following message on Twitter



“There’s no way to justify or defend the abominable behavior of the hate groups responsible for the violence & destruction in Charlottesville”



And I think that Franklin Graham was right on point with the following statement…



Pray for Governor of Virginia Terry McAuliffe, law enforcement, and everyone struggling to deal with the chaos and violence that reared its ugly head in Charlottesville today. It is such a tragedy—life was lost and many people were injured. Violence and hatred aren’t the answer. God’s Word tells us, “Get rid of all bitterness, rage and anger, brawling and slander, along with every form of malice” (Ephesians 4:31). Join me in praying for the injured, the families of those who died—and for peace to be restored.



A tragedy like this should unite all of us.


These are no “sides” to take in this matter, and there is nothing to debate. What was done was purely evil, and it was birthed out of a worldview that is purely evil as well. The following comes from Dr. Michael Brown



There is nothing American about White Supremacism — nothing heroic, nothing praiseworthy, nothing patriotic. It is a rotten, ugly mindset full of hatred, bigotry, and pride, and every person of conscience should denounce it. It degrades others who are also created in the image of God and takes His name in vain to further its cause. Whatever our political or racial or ethnic background, as Americans, we need to stand together against it.



Lastly, Ivanka Trump summed up things very well when she posted this statement on Twitter



“There should be no place in society for racism, white supremacy and neo-nazis.”



I simply do not understand the hatred that fuels racist hearts.


As a Christian, the Bible tells me that God considers every single individual to be of immense value. In fact, God loved each one of us so much that He sent His only Son to die on the cross for our sins.


So if Jesus was willing to die for someone, who are you to hate that person?


If you regularly follow my work, then you already know that I have been a very outspoken opponent of racism for many years. If we don’t learn how to start loving one another, it is difficult to see how we are going to have any sort of a positive future. Racism is an evil that needs to be eradicated, and my hope is that this great tragedy will start to bring the nation together and that a season of healing will begin.

Thursday, August 3, 2017

Race, Skin And Converting Sunlight Into Metabolic Energy

Race, Skin And Converting Sunlight Into Metabolic Energy | sun-exposure-fb | General Health Special Interests


While ubiquitous in nature, melanin, which provides the coloring found in hair, skin, eyes, feathers, scales, etc., is an especially important substance as far as the human condition is concerned. Melanin’s role in determining skin color makes it the primary physiological basis for racial differentiation among humans; in fact, entire civilizations have arisen and fallen due to perceptions and misperceptions concerning its nature and signification.


It is for this reason that we have chosen to focus on melanin’s lesser known, biological role and how being more pigmented, i.e. darker skinned, or put oppositely, being less intensely de-pigmented, i.e. less light skinned, may have a unique set of health benefits which have been repressed or misrepresented over the course of history, in order to fuel race-based constructs.


Melanin, after all, has a diverse set of  roles in various organisms. From the ink of the octopus, to the melanin-based protective colorings of bacteria and fungi, melanin offers protection against  a  variety of threats: from predators and similar biochemical threats (host defenses against invading organisms), UV light, and other chemical stresses (i.e. heavy metals and oxidizing agents). Commonly overlooked, however, is melanin’s ability to convert gamma and ultraviolet radiation into metabolic energy within living systems.



Single-celled fungi, for instance, have been observed thriving within the collapsed nuclear reactor at Chernobyl, Ukraine, using gamma radiation as a source of energy. Albino fungi, without melanin, were studied to be incapable of using gamma radiation in this way, proving that gamma rays initiate a yet-unknown process of energy production within exposed melanin.


Vertebrate animals, in fact, may convert light directly into metabolic energy through the help of melanin. In a review on the topic published in 2008 in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, titled “Melanin directly converts light for vertebrate metabolic use: heuristic thoughts on birds, Icarus and dark human skin,”  Geoffrey Goodman and Dani Bercovich offer a thought-provoking reflection on the topic, the abstract of which is well worth reading in its entirety:


Pigments serve many visually obvious animal functions (e.g. hair, skin, eyes, feathers, scales). One is ‘melanin’, unusual in an absorption across the UV-visual spectrum which is controversial. Any polymer or macro-structure of melanin monomers is ‘melanin’. Its roles derive from complex structural and physical-chemical properties e.g. semiconductor, stable radical, conductor, free radical scavenger, charge-transfer.


Clinicians and researchers are well acquainted with melanin in skin and ocular pathologies and now increasingly are with internal, melanized, pathology-associated sites not obviously subject to light radiation (e.g. brain, cochlea). At both types of sites some findings puzzle: positive and negative neuromelanin effects in Parkinsons; unexpected melanocyte action in the cochlea, in deafness; melanin reduces DNA damage, but can promote melanoma; in melanotic cells, mitochondrial number was 83% less, respiration down 30%, but development similar to normal amelanotic cells.


A little known, avian anatomical conundrum may help resolve melanin paradoxes. One of many unique adaptations to flight, the pecten, strange intra-ocular organ with unresolved function(s), is much enlarged and heavily melanized in birds fighting gravity, hypoxia, thirst and hunger during long-distance, frequently sub-zero, non-stop migration. The pecten may help cope with energy and nutrient needs under extreme conditions, by a marginal but critical, melanin-initiated conversion of light to metabolic energy, coupled to local metabolite recycling.


Similarly in Central Africa, reduction in body hair and melanin increase may also have lead to ‘photomelanometabolism’ which, though small scale/ unit body area, in total may have enabled a sharply increased development of the energy-hungry cortex and enhanced human survival generally. Animal inability to utilize light energy directly has been traditionally assumed. Melanin and the pecten may have unexpected lessons also for human physiology and medicine.


If the authors are correct, a longstanding assumption that animals are incapable of utilizing light energy directly is now called into question.  In other words, our skin may contain the equivalent of  melanin “solar-panels,”  and it may be possible to “ingest” energy, as plants do, directly from the Sun. We already know that sunlight exposure can reduce the risk of over 30 diseases, and that its primary metabolite in our skin, vitamin D, may reduce the risk of over 200.


Our biological connection and dependence to the sun, in fact, is so profound, that the very variation in human skin color from African, melanin-saturated dark skin, to the relatively melanin de-pigmented, Caucasian lighter-skin, is a byproduct of the offspring of our last common ancestor from Africa (as determined by mitochondrial DNA) migrating towards sunlight-impoverished higher latitudes, which began approximately 60,000 years ago. In order to compensate for the lower availability of sunlight, the body rapidly adjusted, essentially requiring the removal of the natural “sunscreen” melanin from the skin, which interferes with vitamin D production; vitamin D, of course, is involved in the regulation of over 2,000 genes, and therefore is more like a hormone, without which our entire genetic infrastructure becomes destabilized.


While a life-saving adaptation, the loss of melanin likely has adverse health effects, which include losing the ability to convert sunlight into metabolic energy, increased prevalence of Parkinson’s disease (which involves de-melanization of the substantia nigra), and others effects which have yet been investigated in any detail. For now, it is important to point out that within the span of only 60,000 years (a nanosecond in biological time), many of the skin “color” differences among the world’s human inhabitants reflect how heavily genetically-conserved was the ability of the human body to produce vitamin D. Furthermore, the trade-off involved in maintaining the ability create enough vitamin D within a sunlight-deprived clime by sacrificing melanin may have had adverse health effects that are only now being realized.


© August 3, 2017 GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here http://www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.

Monday, June 12, 2017

Racial Unrest Escalates: Radical Evergreen State College Protesters Vs. Neo-Nazis

Racial Unrest Escalates: Radical Evergreen State College Protesters Vs. Neo-Nazis | Racial-Unrest-Escalates | Multimedia Special Interests US News


The campus of Evergreen State College isn’t as idyllic as it looks. It’s a bastion of anti-white racism that has been taken over by angry students roaming the campus armed with baseball bats. And the unrest promises to escalate as a group of self-proclaimed Nazis stirs the pot.


The result of this will only be a further polarization between the races



The whole event began when a group of students, aided and abetted by a professor, decided that the campus should have “A Day without White People” to protest “institutional racism.” (source)


Because, you know, banning someone from coming to school or work because of the color of their skin isn’t racism as long as the banned people are white.


Even a progressive professor thought it was too much, and he let everyone know it by first sending the letter below calling it “an act of oppression” and then appearing on Fox News to further condemn the act.


Racial Unrest Escalates: Radical Evergreen State College Protesters Vs. Neo-Nazis | Capture1 | Multimedia Special Interests US News


This did not go over well with the students behaving badly.


Students furiously demanded Weinstein’s resignation or, barring him leaving voluntarily, that he be fired. (source)


And by furious, I mean this:



And this:



They were pretty mad about the video, too, and made the following demand:



“We demand that the video created for Day of Absence and Day of Presence that was stolen by white supremacists and edited to expose and ridicule the students and staff be taken down by the administration by this Friday.”


Next steps:
Based on conversations with the Attorney General’s office, the most likely course of action requires an investigation. We commit to launching an extensive forensic investigation of the theft of this video and to determining who stole it from the student. If that investigation yields a suspect, we will seek criminal charges against the individual in consultation with the Attorney General. (source)



Here are the rest of their demands.


Then the Evergreen State College president capitulated to nearly all the demands.



They’ve found a sympathetic ear in Evergreen State College President George Bridges, who has caved to every demand, even excusing them from their homework and praising them for their “courage.”



Bridges said that the college will not discipline the students for their protests, the college will expand police training, establish an “expanded equity and multicultural center,” and force school faculty to undergo additional cultural sensitivity training. The school also agreed to hire coordinators for transgender and gay students as well as a liaison for undocumented students.


The only demands that the school did not follow through on was firing Weinstein and two other campus officials.


“We are grateful to the courageous students who have voiced their concerns,” Bridges said.


“We have heard from students very clearly that they experience racism on campus that interferes with their education. We acknowledge that the status quo isn’t acceptable. We don’t know all the answers,” he explained. “We want to come together with you to learn from your experience, to build solutions, and to take action. We are grateful for this catalyst to expedite the work to which we are jointly committed.” (source)



(You can read his full statement here.)


But students still weren’t happy.


As tensions escalated, Professor Weinstein, the guy who refused to participate in the Day of Absence, had to stay away for a week for his own safety. (source) The campus had to be evacuated and closed down for three days due to “threats.” (source)


One of those threats is student “protesters,” who have been allegedly “patrolling” with baseball bats and hitting people that they don’t feel should be there. Interestingly, quite a few of the patrollers seem to be white.

Monday, May 1, 2017

Diabetes is on the Rise Among Tweens and Teens

Type 2 diabetes was once considered an old person’s disease; but as more Americans became obese, younger adults started developing the condition. Now type 2 diabetes is striking a growing number of kids. Data from the CDC show that about 17% of kids and teens in the U.S. are now considered obese, and a new study indicates that there has been a corresponding increase in childhood cases of type 2 diabetes. [1]


In the past, type 2 diabetes was referred to as adult-onset diabetes because the condition would take years to develop. These days, even toddlers are being diagnosed with the disease.


Scientists recently reviewed data on 10- to 19-year-olds in primarily five states – California, Colorado, Ohio, South Carolina, and Washington – and determined that 12.5 of every 100,000 of them had full-blown type 2 diabetes in 2011 and 2012. In 2002 and 2003, just 9 out of every 100,000 kids had the disease. [1]




Read: Number of Children with Diabetes Jumps 14% Between 2000-2008


After accounting for age, gender, race, and ethnicity, the authors of the study, published in the New England Journal of Medicinefound that the incidence of type 2 diabetes in this age group rose by 4.8% during the study period. That means that about 1,500 more kids and teens were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes each year at the end of the study period compared with the beginning. [1]


Gaps in Gender and Ethnicity


The rate of new diagnosed cases of type 2 diabetes rose most sharply in this age group among Native Americans (8.9%), Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders (8.5%), and non-Hispanic blacks (6.3%). [2]


Among Hispanics ages 10 to 19, the rate of new diagnosed cases increased 3.1%. The smallest increase was seen in whites (0.6%).


The rate of new diagnosed cases of type 2 diabetes increased much more significantly in females (6.2%) than in males (3.7%).


Source: Los Angeles Times

Barbara Linder, M.D., Ph.D., senior advisor for childhood diabetes research at NIH’s National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, said:


“These findings lead to many more questions. The differences among racial and ethnic groups and between genders raise many questions. We need to understand why the increase in rates of diabetes development varies so greatly and is so concentrated in specific racial and ethnic groups.” [2]


Tweens and Teens Affected Equally


In 2003, slightly more teens than tweens had type 2 diabetes, with 10 cases of type 2 diabetes per 100,000 teens (ages 15-19) compared with 8 cases per 100,000 among tweens (ages 10-14). However, by 2012, there were 12.9 cases per 100,000 in teens and 12.1 per 100,000 among tweens. [1]


Years of Life Lost


The complications of type 2 diabetes are many, but generally include heart and blood vessel disease; nerve damage (neuropathy); kidney damage, sometimes leading to the need for dialysis or transplant; eye damage; foot damage, often leading to infection and amputation; hearing loss; skin conditions; and possibly Alzheimer’s disease. [3]


The longer diabetes goes untreated, the more damage it does to the body. This is especially concerning among young people, whose lives may be shortened.


The number of years people lived with diabetes-related disabilities rose globally by nearly 33% between 2005 and 2015, according to a report published in 2016 in The Lancet. Conversely, the number of years of life lost to type 2 diabetes increased more than 25%. [1]




In other words, doctors are doing a better job of treating diabetes and diabetes-related conditions, yet “the overall adverse effect of diabetes on public health is actually increasing,” according to an editorial accompanying the study.


Sources:


[1] Los Angeles Times


[2] National Institutes of Health


[3] Mayo Clinic


Los Angeles Times



Storable Food


About Julie Fidler:


Author Image
Julie Fidler is a freelance writer, legal blogger, and the author of Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or the Absolute Worst. She lives in Pennsylvania with her husband and two ridiculously spoiled cats. She occasionally pontificates on her blog.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Wellesley College Says Controversial Speakers "Impose On The Liberty Of Students" By Making Them Think Too Much

Authored by Alex Morey and Samantha Harris via TheFire.org,



In an email to fellow faculty yesterday afternoon, a committee of Wellesley College professors made several startling recommendations about how they think future campus speakers should be chosen. If implemented, the proposals by the faculty Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity would have a profound impact on the quality and quantity of voices Wellesley students would be permitted to hear.



FIRE has obtained the email, sent by one of the signatories to a faculty listserv, and republished it in full below.


While paying lip service to free speech, the email is remarkable in its contempt for free and open dialogue on campus. Asserting that controversial speakers “impose on the liberty of students, staff, and faculty at Wellesley,” the committee members lament the fact that such speakers negatively impact students by forcing them to “invest time and energy in rebutting the speakers’ arguments.”


And here we thought learning to effectively challenge views with which one disagreed was an important part of the educational process!


They point specifically to a recent appearance by Northwestern University professor Laura Kipnis, a self-described feminist who has criticized Title IX implementation and a “culture of sexual paranoia” on campuses.





(Kipnis’ visit elicited a video response from Wellesley students who disagreed with her.)


The committee recommends that those inviting any future speakers “consider whether, in their zeal for promoting debate, they might, in fact, stifle productive debate by enabling the bullying of disempowered groups,” adding that the committee would be “happy to serve as a sounding board when hosts are considering inviting controversial speakers, to help sponsors think through the various implications of extending an invitation.” They also argue that “standards of respect and rigor must remain paramount when considering whether a speaker is actually qualified for the platform granted by an invitation to Wellesley.”


But the implementation of such reforms would, in itself, establish a campus orthodoxy and a climate in which any speaking invitation might be subject to prior review by a select few faculty.


Kipnis, reached for comment by FIRE, disapproved.





I find it absurd that six faculty members at Wellesley can call themselves defenders of free speech and also conflate my recent talk with bullying the disempowered,” Kipnis told FIRE in an email.



“What actually happened was that there was a lively back and forth after I spoke. The students were smart and articulate, including those who disagreed with me.”


 


“I’m going to go further and say — as someone who’s been teaching for a long time, and wants to see my students able to function in the world post-graduation — that protecting students from the ‘distress’ of someone’s ideas isn’t education, it’s a $67,000 babysitting bill.”



FIRE will be looking more into this development at Wellesley in the coming days.



*  *  *


Full email below:


From: ?Michael P Jeffries? <?mjeffrie@wellesley.edu?>
Date: Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:43 PM
Subject: [FacStaffDiscuss] Statement from CERE faculty re: Laura Kipnis Freedom Project visit and aftermath
To: Faculty-Staff Discussion <?facstaffdiscuss@wellesley.edu?>


To: Wellesley Community
From: Faculty on Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity (CERE)
Re: Laura Kipnis visit and aftermath
3/20/17


Over the past few years, several guest speakers with controversial and objectionable beliefs have presented their ideas at Wellesley. We, the faculty in CERE, defend free speech and believe it is essential to a liberal arts education. However, as historian W. Jelani Cobb notes, “The freedom to offend the powerful is not equivalent to the freedom to bully the relatively disempowered. The enlightenment principles that undergird free speech also prescribed that the natural limits of one’s liberty lie at the precise point at which it begins to impose upon the liberty of another.”


There is no doubt that the speakers in question impose on the liberty of students, staff, and faculty at Wellesley. We are especially concerned with the impact of speakers’ presentations on Wellesley students, who often feel the injury most acutely and invest time and energy in rebutting the speakers’ arguments. Students object in order to affirm their humanity. This work is not optional; students feel they would be unable to carry out their responsibilities as students without standing up for themselves. Furthermore, we object to the notion that onlookers who are part of the faculty or administration are qualified to adjudicate the harm described by students, especially when so many students have come forward. When dozens of students tell us they are in distress as a result of a speaker’s words, we must take these complaints at face value.


What is especially disturbing about this pattern of harm is that in many cases, the damage could have been avoided. The speakers who appeared on campus presented ideas that they had published, and those who hosted the speakers could certainly anticipate that these ideas would be painful to significant portions of the Wellesley community. Laura Kipnis’s recent visit to Wellesley prompted students to respond to Kipnis’s presentation with a video post on Facebook.


Kipnis posted the video on her page, and professor Tom Cushman left a comment that publicly disparaged the students who produced the video. Professor Cushman apologized for his remarks, but in light of these developments, we recommend the following.


First, those who invite speakers to campus should consider whether, in their zeal for promoting debate, they might, in fact, stifle productive debate by enabling the bullying of disempowered groups. We in CERE are happy to serve as a sounding board when hosts are considering inviting controversial speakers, to help sponsors think through the various implications of extending an invitation.


Second, standards of respect and rigor must remain paramount when considering whether a speaker is actually qualified for the platform granted by an invitation to Wellesley. In the case of an academic speaker, we ask that the Wellesley host not only consider whether the speaker holds credentials, but whether the presenter has standing in his/her/their discipline. This is not a matter of ideological bias. Pseudoscience suggesting that men are more naturally equipped to excel in STEM fields than women, for example, has no place at Wellesley. Similar arguments pertaining to race, ethnicity, sexuality, religion, and other identity markers are equally inappropriate.


Third, faculty and administrators should step up in defense of themselves and all members of the Wellesley community. The responsibility to defend the disempowered does not rest solely with students, and the injuries suffered by students, faculty, and staff are not contained within the specific identity group in question; they ripple throughout our community and prevent Wellesley from living out its mission.


In solidarity,


Diego Arcineagas
Beth DeSombre
Brenna Greer
Soo Hong
Michael Jeffries
Layli Maparyan


[emphasis added]

Monday, January 9, 2017

‘White’ Philosophers Next Ban At College: “A Real Danger Of Political Correctness Out of Control”

platobust

“Rather ridiculous” … and ultimately quite dangerous.



Apparently, there is no end to the stupidity… especially at centers of higher learning.


In the quest for diversity, fair representation and perhaps payback, some racially-minded education reformers are now attempting to erase philosophers like Plato and Kant from the curriculum – because they are ‘white.’


Never mind that some of these minds are foundational to knowledge as we know it, or the direction of western society.


They are white.


via RT:



University of London students are demanding that thinkers such as Plato, Aristotle, Voltaire, and Immanuel Kant be banned from the philosophy syllabus… because they are white.


UK media quotes students from the University of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) as saying that “the majority of philosophers on our courses” should be from Africa and Asia.


“White philosophers” should be on the syllabus only “if required,” and their work should be studied from a “critical standpoint,” the statement said, as cited by British media.



It is everything that Martin Luther King, Jr. didn’t stand for: judging people by the color of their skin, and not the merits of their ideas.


Moreover, the bizarre campaign is essentially encouraging deliberate ignorance of some of western cultures most central figures, Plato being a key example.


Considering the importance of thinking critically about philosophical arguments and their relevance to historical and contemporary developments, it all seems pretty dopey.


Have politically-correct liberals and whiners ruined the value of a good education once and for all, to instead replace it with ‘acceptable’ and curated views only?


via the Daily Mail:



The students say it is in order to ‘decolonise’ the ‘white institution’ that is their college.


[p]hilosopher Sir Roger Scruton lambasted the union’s demand, saying: ‘This suggests ignorance and a determination not to overcome that ignorance. You can’t rule out a whole area of intellectual endeavour without having investigated it and clearly they haven’t investigated what they mean by white philosophy…’


The vice-chancellor of Buckingham University Sir Anthony Seldon said: ‘There is a real danger political correctness is getting out of control. We need to understand the world as it was and not to rewrite history as some might like it to have been.’


[…]


The head of SOAS’s Religions and Philosophies department Erica Hunter said the union’s viewpoint was ‘rather ridiculous’, adding: ‘I would firmly resist dropping philosophers or historians just because it was fashionable.’



This is a trend that has simply gone too far. Racism is a bait-and-switch to distract people from the real sources of oppression – they want communities divided along the lines of skin color. This is the primary reason that so much attention is drawn to it.


Of course, it should come as no surprise that the non-white philosopher who these students would like to see replace ancient figures in philosopher is none other than the same anti-colonial thinker who inspired President Obama back in his radical college days.


As the Washington Post noted back in 2008, when Obama had just become the president-elect:



Barack Obama wrote in “Dreams From My Father” of his days as a student at Occidental College, groping for his political identity: “We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neocolonialism, Frantz Fanon, Eurocentrism and patriarchy.”


[…]


What made Fanon a guru for the left was his focus on the anger and alienation of the formerly colonized people of Africa. Born in the French colony of Martinique, he studied psychiatry in France and practiced in Algeria during that country’s bloody revolt against French colonialism. Much of “The Wretched of the Earth” is empty vitriol extolling violence as a path to liberation… […] Obama is a living rebuttal to Fanon’s rage of the powerless… about to assume the most powerful job on Earth. It is Fanon’s world turned upside down.



While there are some good cases of actual racism to draw from, seeing racism everywhere in the pages of history, despite a direct link to the work of these individuals simply foolish.


And while Fanon may have a place in the class curriculum, erasing or downplaying the importance of “white” thinkers – as it happened in the world that exists, for better or worse, is not the way to create a better world.


Rewriting history creates an Orwellian society, not one free from racism and injustice.


Read more:


Got White Privilege? College Students Flunked for Using “Oppressive and Hateful Language”


New MTV Show Publicly Shames White People For “What They’ve Done In America”


No Whites Allowed: Student Booted From Conference Because Of Skin Color: “Because I was white they would feel unsafe?”


“Bound, Gagged and Bloody”: Racist Thugs Force Kidnapped White Man To Say ‘F–– Donald Trump’

Thursday, January 5, 2017

“Bound, Gagged and Bloody”: Racist Thugs Force Kidnapped White Man To Say ‘F–– Donald Trump’


screen-shot-2017-01-05-at-9-26-49-am


This article was written by Paul Joseph Watson and originally published at Infowars.com


Editor’s Comment: There’s a complete lack of understanding in the people about who the real enemy is. Instead, groups divided by race attack each other based on race, and on general assumptions about the election. There is little doubt that this nation can be torn down by dividing among itself.


After months of touting the victimhood of Black Lives Matter protesters, and the sanctity of their cause, the media can no longer look away from disturbing cases of black-on-white crimes of abuse, harassment, torture, humiliation and the like. Despite all this, the portrayal of the opposite of this event is likely to drag on with the fresh face and divisive politics of the next president.


Shock Video: White Man Kidnapped, Gagged, Beaten By Racist Black Anti-Trump Gang


by Paul Joseph Watson


A shocking video shows a white man bound, gagged and bloody as a gang of racist black thugs force him to say “f**k Donald Trump” and “f**k white people”.



The video was uploaded to Facebook live yesterday by a user named Brittany Herring, the African-American woman who appears in the clip.


The 30 minute video shows a young man tied up in a corner with blood coming from his head. The man’s mouth is gagged as thugs humiliate and abuse him.


The victim is repeatedly kicked and hit while forced to denounce white people and Donald Trump.




Chicago police tell Fox 32 that four people are in custody and authorities are conducting further investigation.




The young man seen in the clip, who has special needs, is now in hospital and is being treated for his injuries.


“The incident took place Tuesday in an apartment on the 3400 block of West Lexington on Chicago’s West Side,” according to police.


The footage is a chilling illustration of how anti-Trump hatred, which accelerated after the election, is now completely out of control.


Will the media even cover this footage or will news networks like CNN bury the story as they continue to hype hoax hate crimes faked by anti-Trump leftists?




This article was written by Paul Joseph Watson and originally published at Infowars.com



Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.

Advanced Tactical Gas Mask

Please Spread The Word And Share This Post