Showing posts with label colin kaepernick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label colin kaepernick. Show all posts

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Watch: Fox News Hosts Meltdown Over Super Bowl Protests That Haven’t Happened Yet

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed) — Fox News snowflakes are melting in anticipation of the Super Bowl, where they fear NFL players may take a knee in ongoing protests against police brutality and institutional racism.


On the Outnumbered morning show, the panel expressed their dismay and fragility over the possibility that the apparent disrespect would be televised.


Just days after President Trump stood for the national anthem at the college football championship,” host Katie Pavlich began, clearly framing the narrative that was to come, “the producers of the upcoming Super Bowl say they’ll show [it] if NFL players take a knee.


So didn’t half of their viewers just turn off their dial for Super Bowl weekend [and] find something else to do?” she remarked.


Guest Dan Bongino, a former secret service agent, smugly chimed in.


Yeah, we’re covering a live event, too, it’s been ongoing for two years now, which is the destruction of the NFL brand,” he said. As the female hosts laughed, he added, “I promise you this will be taught in business schools from this point on as an episode of what not to do to keep your goodwill and brand equity. I mean, this is a disgrace, an absolute total embarrassment.


Asked if he wanted cameras turned away in the event of kneeling, he responded:


No, I want them to tell the people ‘Get off your damn knees and stand up for the American anthem that people died for in this country. You wanna protest? Go out there and do it on your own time. These are our fields, this is our brand. You are gonna stand and put your hand on your heart or that million dollar salary’s getting flushed down the toilet bowl. Have a nice day.’”


Despite right-wingers’ ongoing boycott of the NFL, host Melissa Francis advised viewers to keep watching but record the games and fast forward through the ‘offensive’ material (even though doing so arguably cancels out the effect of boycotting).


[I]t’s interesting,” she said. “I think more and more people are watching it on delay. In my household, we wait until the game is already started, and then we turn it on.


Host Sandra Smith attempted to play devil’s advocate, but not before making it abundantly clear that she disapproves of NBC’s choice to air potential footage of players kneeling.


I don’t know what obligation the television networks have, but I think that their point is — I’m not defending it — their point is ‘We’ve got our cameras on a game, this is part of the game, we’re going to show every bit of it.”


Bongino still had more to say, waxing melodramatic over his decision to boycott the NFL


If they don’t fix this problem, I can almost guarantee you in four or five years that the NFL is going to be the field hockey or modern sports,” he said, eventually adding:


I was a Raiders and Ravens fan, and I’m telling you, it destroyed my soul to not watch the Super Bowl last year. NFL and me, we are absolutely completely divorced.”



And there we have it: a right-wing snowflake suffering from the destruction of his sacred soul because he couldn’t watch a football game — all because he couldn’t handle American citizens exercising their right to free speech and a private company supporting their right to allegedly not respect “an anthem.”


Bongino has repeatedly decried the NFL protests since 2016.


Op-ed / Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo

Friday, December 15, 2017

Fan Sues Saints, Wants Season Ticket Refund Over NFL Players Protest

A season-ticket holder has just filed a lawsuit against the New Orleans Saints demanding the organization refunds his money because some players have disrespected the national anthem before games this season. The fan, Lee Dragna, filed the lawsuit on Monday against the NFL team for $8,000 plus lawyer’s fees. In the lawsuit, he claims, the protest by some players against police brutality and racial injustice has prevented him and his family from enjoying the games.


He bought the tickets for the “entertainment and intellectual enjoyment”, and said he would have never made the purchase had he known NFL players would “use Saints football games as a platform for protests.” Further, the suit alleges Dragna hasn’t attended a game since players protested the first home game, on September 17.


The suit said,




They passed directly in front of where the petitioner and his guests were seated. Many of the fans in that area booed and cursed at the Saints players.


 


Apparently, these players were following the lead of (former San Francisco 49ers quarterback) Colin Kaepernick by disrespecting the flag, the anthem, the USA and those who have served and are serving the USA in our military.   




On Tuesday, Dragna told The New Orleans Advocate,




That the rowdy, angry reaction of the people around his seats has made the tickets unusable by him and his family, as well as customers he would otherwise give the tickets to.


 


He said the behavior of some fans upset by the protests — cursing, spilling beer — is “borderline dangerous,” though he said he thinks the responsibility for that behavior ultimately rests not with the fans but with owner Tom Benson.


 


“The Saints created that behavior by condoning it,” he said.


 


“It’s my thought pattern that (players) should not be allowed (to protest),” he said. “If you sell tickets to a gaming event for entertainment, you should not be allowed to turn it political.”




According to ESPN, the Saints declined to comment, saying they had escalated the situation to the legal department.  However, an anonymous source said the organization is “taking this very seriously, and this fan best have his facts in order.”


“The Saints will come back at this fan who has brought forth incorrect information in his statement with everything to defend the team, organization and players,” the source said.


Two days ago, Saint’s running back Mark Ingram II lashed out at Dragna on social media.. ESPN notes that Ingram was one of 10 Saint players who sat on the bench during the national anthem in week 3, in response to President Trump’s comments about NFL players (see: Trump Goes Nuclear: Trump Sports Feud Escalates: Demands NFL Chief “Tells Them To Stand”).



According to Gabe Feldman, director of Tulane University’s Sports Law Program,


“Fans do not have legal standing or a cause of action simply because they are unhappy with how a team performs or acts on the field. If fans were allowed to sue for breach of contract every time they were disappointed with the performance or conduct of a player, there would be an unending string of lawsuits across the country.”


He further explained:  “An NFL ticket allows you to enter a stadium to watch a football game, but it does not guarantee that the players will act in ways that do not upset you — either athletically or politically.”


And as the story of Dragna’s lawsuit circulates across millions of American households, many of whom have stepped away from NFL stadiums and television sets on Sundays (see: NFL Ratings Slump Worsens As ESPN Forced To Slash $80 Million In Salary Costs.), one wonders: did Dragna start the (inevitable) blowback of angry NFL fans asking teams and Goodell for their money back?









Saturday, November 25, 2017

How Colin Kaepernick "Celebrated" Thanksgiving

Former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick traveled to Alcatraz Island to participate in the Indigenous People’s Sunrise Gathering for Thanksgiving Thursday.



As The Daily Caller"s Amber Randall reports, the event, also called “Un-Thanksgiving Day,” took place on Alcatraz to remember the group of American Indians who took control of the island prison between 1969-1971 in an attempt to claim the island for their people, reports KTLA.



“Today, I was on Alcatraz Island at the Indigenous People’s Sunrise Gathering, in solidarity with those celebrating their culture and paying respects to those that participated in the 19 month occupation of Alcatraz in an effort to force to honor the Treaty of Fort Laramie,” Kaepernick said in a tweet.


An American Indian elder also gave Kaepernick two eagle feathers, after which the former quarterback gave a speech declaring they were all fighting the same battle.


“I’m very humbled to share this space with all of you. Our fight is the same fight. We’re all fighting for our justice, for our freedom. And realizing that we’re in this fight together makes us all the more powerful,” Kaepernick said in a Twitter video.










Monday, October 30, 2017

Texans Kneel During Anthem After Owner"s "Inmates" Comments, As NFL Viewership Slides

Most players on the Houston Texans team knelt during the national anthem ahead of the team’s Sunday game with the Seattle Seahawks, following controversial comments made by the team’s owner, Bob McNair.



The protest came after Texans owner Bob McNair apologized for comparing players protesting during the anthem to “inmates running the prison.”


"I am truly sorry to the players for how this has impacted them and the perception that it has created of me, which could not be further from the truth,” McNair said, according to ESPN, which reported on Friday that McNair said “we can’t have the inmates running the prison,” in reference to players protesting police brutality during the national anthem.  McNair also reportedly told Houston players he wasn’t referring to them in his remarks.


The Texans’ protest comes as some players continue to protest during the anthem, more than a month after Trump launched a twitter attack on demonstrating players.


On Sunday, several San Francisco 49ers players knelt during the anthem on Sunday, two Philadelphia Eagles players reportedly raised their fists, according to The Associated Press, while nearly all players on the Minnesota Vikings and Cleveland Browns linked arms during the anthem as well. 


Also on Sunday, Rev. Jesse Jackson called for NFL players to escalate their "kneeling" protests in the face of criticism from President Trump and league owners.


“The players should escalate their nonviolent protests,” the civil rights leader told The Houston Chronicle on Sunday. “Donald Trump called them ‘sons of bitches.’ (Colin) Kaepernick is not degrading the flag. He’s kneeling to pray, which is in our best tradition. If we had not knelt and prayed nonviolently, where would we be today as a society?”


In the interview, Jackson decided to escalate the controversy and said NFL owners have a “plantation mentality” and believes there should be sanctions against McNair for his comments. Jackson reached out to McNair and Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, but hasn’t heard back from either, he told the Chronicle.


“The players are objectified in a sense,” Jackson said. “Mr. McNair is a product of the South. They act like he’s a victim or misunderstood, but those players have made him a wealthy man.”


Jackson did not elaborate how NFL players should escalate their protests.


Meanwhile, according to Nielsen Ratings, NFL viewership has posted a steep decline in recent weeks since the kneeling scandal erupted, which also led several advertisers to pull their funding from the NFL broadcasts.  NFL games averaged 15.1 million viewers through Week 7, according to Nielsen data obtained by Sporting News. That"s down 5.1% from 15.87 million viewers during the same period last season and off 18.7% from 18.35 million viewers during the same period in 2015.









Tuesday, October 10, 2017

NFL Caves: Owners Consider Rule Change Requiring Players To Stand For National Anthem

It appears that Trump is about to have the last laugh in his long-running spat with the NFL.


Moments ago, Dow Jones reported that NFL owners are considering a rule change that would require players to stand for national anthem.


A league spokesman said that the owners would discuss the potential change during a meeting next week, Dow Jones reported.


In recent seasons, primarily black professional football players have knelt during the national anthem to protest racial inequality in the United States. The protests started after former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick last year began kneeling during the anthem to protest police mistreatment of black Americans.


As a reminder, earlier on Tuesday Trump tweeted that tax laws should be changed so that the NFL doesn"t get "massive tax breaks while at the same time disrespecting our Anthem, Flag and Country."



The Feud started in late September, when the president renewed discussion about the protests when he urged owners to "fire" the "son of a bitch" who kneels during the anthem.


And while we await more details, we wonder just how dramatic the NFL viewership - and ad revenue - collapse in the past few weeks must have been for the football league, which initially was so vocally against Trump, to make such an dramatic and unexpected U-turn.

Monday, September 25, 2017

NFL Teams Stayed in Locker Rooms For Anthem Until 2009—Then DoD Began ‘Paying for Patriotism’

patriotism

President Trump’s condemnation of NFL players that choose to kneel, rather than stand for the national anthem, reignited a national debate that began with Colin Kaepernick’s decision not to stand for the anthem last season as a protest against police brutality.


Over the weekend a plethora of players and even entire teams chose to either kneel or stay in the locker room during the playing of the national anthem – while many NFL owners released statements eliciting support for players who choose not to stand.


What many people are missing in this debate is the fact that prior to 2009, NFL teams did not generally stand for the anthem. While having the option to do so individually if they chose to, most of the time they stayed in the locker room during this pregame ritual.


In fact, Tom E. Curran of Comcast Sportsnet New England reported, in August 2016, that NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy confirmed that the now common practice of players standing on the field together for the national anthem only began in 2009.


Advertisment




Additionally, it has come to light that many of the “patriotic” pregame displays in the NFL are simply propaganda displays that were paid for by the U.S. Department of Defense and the National Guard – meaning that these displays were actually paid for by the American taxpayers.


These displays of patriotic propaganda, called “paid patriotism,” were brought to light in April 2015, when Arizona Senator Jeff Flake released a statement condemning the practice.



READ MORE:  Crips, Bloods Call Truce, Not to Harm Cops But to Protect their Community from Violence & Looting



Then in November 2015, Flake and fellow Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain issued a report stating that the U.S. Department of Defense had been paying the NFL for patriotic displays in football and other sports between 2011 and 2014:




Contrary to the public statements made by DOD and the NFL, the majority of the contracts — 72 of the 122 contracts we analyzed — clearly show that DOD paid for patriotic tributes at professional football, baseball, basketball, hockey, and soccer games. These paid tributes included on-field color guard, enlistment and reenlistment ceremonies, performances of the national anthem, full-field flag details, ceremonial first pitches͕ and puck drops. The National Guard paid teams for the “opportunity” to sponsor military appreciation nights and to recognize its birthday. It paid the Buffalo Bills to sponsor its Salute to the Service game. DOD even paid teams for the “opportunity” to perform surprise welcome home promotions for troops returning from deployments and to recognize wounded warriors. While well intentioned, we wonder just how many of these displays included a disclaimer that these events were in fact sponsored by the DOD at taxpayer expense. Even with that disclosure, it is hard to understand how a team accepting taxpayer funds to sponsor a military appreciation game, or to recognize wounded warriors or returning troops, can be construed as anything other than paid patriotism.



In total, the Department of Defense paid 14 NFL teams $5.4 million from 2011 to 2014 for patriotic propaganda during NFL games.


U.S. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) called the spending wasteful spending that “leaves a bad taste in your mouth”:




“Those of us go to sporting events and see them honoring the heroes,” Flake said in an interview. “You get a good feeling in your heart. Then to find out they’re doing it because they’re compensated for it, it leaves you underwhelmed. It seems a little unseemly.”



“They realize the public believes they’re doing it as a public service or a sense of patriotism,” Flake continued. “It leaves a bad taste in your mouth.”



Former congressman Ron Paul released a video condemning the practice, asking,



READ MORE:  Kaepernick Protest Follows in Revolutionary Footsteps of Legends Muhammad Ali & Jackie Robinson



“Do you know why the NFL has become so gung-ho with military propaganda? It’s because the U.S. government pays them to do it! So, our money is taken from us, and given to the NFL, in order to propagandize us to support the Empire’s wars. That has to stop.”



The report by Senators Flake and McCain did not cover the years prior to 2011, thus having no way to verify whether this “paid patriotism” program began in 2009 – the year NFL teams began taking to the field as a team for the national anthem. However, logic would seem to indicate that it was not an organic manifestation given the widespread proclivity of teams and players to stay in the locker room during the anthem—for decades—prior to 2009.


The fact that all the teams in the NFL decided during the 2009 season to start coming to the field early for the national anthem seems to indicate that these actions, which were the exact behaviors pushed for in the “paid patriotism” propaganda program, were not organic, but begun as part of the Department of Defense propaganda program.


And, while the public argues over whether or not players should stand or kneel, there is no debate that this is government sponsored propaganda that is meant to indoctrinate people into supporting an imperial war machine that fights not for America and freedom, but for geopolitical power, access to energy resources, and hegemonic control of the global economic system as predicated by the petrodollar.



Please share this story to help awaken people to the fact that these “patriotic” displays are actually “paid patriotism” propaganda brought to you by the U.S. Department of Defense!

Sunday, September 24, 2017

Refusal to Stand for Flag a Manipulated Widening of National Divide Approved by Unprincipled NFL Leadership

Note men in background not taking a knee. The big lie here is it’s not about his rights at all.



“Being a man who served in the US Army i salute you and am proud of what you did and are doing I served to defend the constitution and your right to practice them. Thank you for using the rights my brothers and sisters died for. you honer us. Thank you! Hooah!” an unedited statement of support on football player Colin Kaepernick’s Facebook page declares.


He’s wrong that Kaepernick’s use of such events and facilities for personal purposes is a right, or that such actions honor Americans who are grateful for what the flag represents and the sacrifices made to keep it waving. Putting on a team uniform and appearing at an event paid for by others means you’re no longer representing yourself, you’re representing those employing you.


When you accept the responsibility of representing a group, your obligation is to represent the goals and the mission of that group. As I noted in “Who Speaks for Oath Keepers?” I have a right to write about any topic I please – just not wherever I want. This is the Oath Keepers site. If I write anything not in the best interests of this organization, Stewart Rhodes and the board have the right to remove it and to boot me out. The same goes if I conduct myself offsite in a way that could bring discredit to the group, and that’s even codified in the Bylaws:



“Oath Keepers reserves the right in its sole discretion, to withhold, deny, or revoke the membership or associate membership of any person whom Oath Keepers determines will dilute, impair or disrupt Oath Keeper’s mission, dishonor, or in any manner bring ill repute to Oath Keepers.”



Players would not be doing this if the enablers behind them did not find national divisiveness, increased racial agitation and cultural transformation advantageous to their interests. That team owners and the NFL have not shut down players hijacking media attention to promote their own political sentiments – sentiments that are irreconcilable with and deeply offensive to the beliefs of many Americans – speaks to the gutlessness, the lack of principle and/or the insidious motives of those supposedly running the show. If owners and the league had refused to accept such disruption the first time it happened, they would have issued a clear and unequivocal rule that if athletes want to play and keep earning millions of dollars, they’re not going to use the branding they appear under for unauthorized purposes.


Then again, it’s not the first time the league has allowed its symbols to be appropriated to advance a subversive agenda: Remember when Michael Bloomberg and Thomas Menino were allowed to use Giants and Patriots jerseys with NFL logos and team hats to stump for citizen disarmament?



NFL proudly promoted such propaganda on its website.


NFL is also being utterly inconsistent and disingenuous, because they claim the power to control player conduct when it comes to the Second Amendment:



“Discipline may be imposed in any of the following circumstances: …Possession of a gun or other weapon in any workplace setting, including but not limited to stadiums, team facilities, training camp, locker rooms, team planes, buses, parking lots, etc., or unlawful possession of a weapon outside of the workplace…”



Admittedly, it’s not like a good number of those players don’t have problems controlling themselves.


And it’s not just the players NFL doesn’t trust. A couple years back, my wife won some preseason tickets to see the Browns, and while I normally couldn’t care less, she wanted to go. Not only did they not allow our collapsible umbrellas for the walk back to the car in the rain, purses were verboten — they wand you and make women put stuff in a clear plastic bag, claiming “enhanced public safety.”


A year ago I wrote “expect the Kaepernick-inspired protests to continue – he wasn’t forced to apologize or be fired on the spot as an example to others, and once you give up control like that, the momentum is just too big to stop. And expect the phenomenon to grow…”


It was hardly prophetic — anyone with eyes and half as brain could see it, and that brings us to where we are today: Pampered useful idiot millionaire athletes doing an in-your-face to an America they libel as “racist,” and doing it on foreign soil. And it’s being allowed and encouraged to spread to “America’s pastime.”


President Donald Trump is on to something when he notes “If NFL fans refuse to go to games until players stop disrespecting our Flag & Country, you will see change take place fast. Fire or suspend!”


I’d take it a step further: The last thing Americans (and particularly American men) need is agenda-spreading bread and circuses, either paying for the “privilege” or wasting hours in front of the telescreen. With the accelerated pace the Republic is being internally subverted, and with the enhanced and extended dangers that appears to be making inevitable, I’m sure we could all find more productive uses for our limited time and resources.


Also see:


—–


If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please make a donation to support our work.  You can donate HERE.


—–


David Codrea’s opinions are his own. See “Who speaks for Oath Keepers?”


The Danger Of Patriotism

Authored by Bob Livingston via Personal Liberty blog,


My friends, it is frightening how simple we are and how easily we are manipulated simply because we are intellectually lazy.



The U.S. establishment has confused cause and effect by and through a flag-waving mania in America. "Patriotism" throughout history has covered a multitude of mischief. We are seeing it now!


Phony patriotism is strong leverage against a population ignorant of the ways of treason by its own government. I also have no doubt that U.S. history is full of wars "for democracy" killing millions under the propaganda of patriotism with the majority support of the people and the full support of all but a small cadre of "elected representatives" — who are paid by the federal government, incidentally. In addition the millions of foreign dead, these wars have left hundreds of thousands of American military members dead or maimed physically and/or emotionally.


The whole world knows about the U.S. military industrial complex war machine and its pursuit of profits. But Americans tend to turn a blind eye.


When George Washington said "government is force," he meant that government is force against its own people.


Since by definition government is force, then it follows that government will use any ruse imaginable to increase its power. Increased use of government force or power could backfire unless skillfully handled and justified in the public mind. Therefore governments rarely take action unless accompanied by skillful propaganda.


The brouhaha over certain NFL players" refusal to stand for the playing of the Star Spangled Banner has erupted anew. The reaction of most Americans — who claim to believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights — is that this expression cannot be tolerated... it is un-American... it is "unpatriotic."


But is it? Or is it not the most American of all things to resist and rebel against what we perceive as tyranny and its symbols?


If we deny one — whether through intimidation and threats, monetary sanctions or government force — his rights, are we not creating a situation where rights are just privileges that can be denied on a whim? If we support police power to invade our homes and wallets and steal our property just because government has made it "legal," are we not again conceding that rights are merely privileges?


You cannot say, "I believe in the 1st Amendment, but...; I believe in the 2nd Amendment, but...; I believe in the 4th Amendment, but..." There is no but.


And if that government making "legal" the assaults on our liberty is represented by a symbol, shouldn"t we conclude that that symbol is a symbol of tyranny? I wrote about the phony patriotism of flag worship when the Colin Kaepernick stir occurred last year.


In light of the new kerfuffle over NFL players refusing to stand, and comments to some of our columns on preserving liberty of late, I felt it was time to run it again. Here it is:


The American golden calf


As a young boy, I enjoyed my family"s bantam chickens that laid very small eggs and hatched very small chicks. Theirs was a small and miniature world.


One day one of my bantams started sitting on eggs to hatch its chicks. Something happened to her eggs but she continued to sit, so I decided to put a duck egg under her. Duck eggs are at least three times bigger than bantam eggs and take a few days longer to hatch, but she dutifully sat on the egg several days longer. She hatched the duckling and, as you can imagine, it thought that his world was normal and that the bantam hen was his mother.


The duckling eventually grew into a full sized mallard duck, probably five or six times the size of its bantam mother. The full-grown duck would follow its hen mother around as would normal chicks. It was a funny sight to watch.


But I remember thinking, even as a small boy, that the duck"s entire reality was that the bantam hen was his mother and that was the way the world worked. He had no need to consider anything else.


This is the world of the American people today. Their perceptions of reality control them and they who control their perceptions control the American people.


Our perception of America has always been that she is the mother country and ordained by God, good and just and a beacon of freedom. This is hammered into our psyches from our early days.


From pre-school up, we are taught to worship the state. I don"t know if it is still done, but in the public (non)education system, for many years, schoolchildren across the South — and elsewhere, I suppose — recited the Pledge of Allegiance each morning. Political rallies and government meetings are still often begun with a recitation of the pledge.


People say it with patriotic fervor, with their hands placed dutifully on their hearts.


Sporting events, political rallies and other public venues are often kicked off with the playing and/or singing of the Star Spangled Banner. Before the song begins, people are instructed to rise, men to remove their hats,and people place their hands over their hearts. They don"t realize its value as a propaganda tool.


We have come to equate the flag, the pledge and the national anthem with patriotism, and patriotism with government, country and support for government, support for foreign wars and veterans. Anything less is "un-American."


Beyond its patriot fervor is the almost religious fervor and religious symbolism of the American people"s actions when the pledge and the national anthem begin: the ritual standing, removal of hats, placing of hands and rote recitation. In the book of Daniel, Israelites Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah (Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego) refused to worship the golden image of Nebuchadnezzar contrary to the king"s decree. The king ordered them to be thrown into the furnace after it was turned up to seven times its normal temperature.


NFL player Colin Kaepernick created a stir last week when he refused to stand for the national anthem. He was not subsequently ordered into the furnace by the king, but he was burned symbolically by many football fans who torched their jerseys. Americans fumed that he should "leave" America if he can"t support the flag and that he had disrespected the flag, the nation and veterans.


What are we saying when we say that someone "disrespected the flag,"  "disrespected the country," "disrespected the veterans" if he chooses to not stand for the national anthem? What is the flag but a piece of cloth? By the reaction to Kaepernick, it seems it has become more of a golden calf to represent mother country or the god of government.


Our mother has become a witch. Yes, same symbols, same flag, same pledge of allegiance, but a decadent spirit controlling the perceptions of the American people, keeping them on the animal farm (controlling their perceptions) long enough to impoverish and enslave them.


Time and gradualism can change a system all the way from human liberty to slavery (the animal farm) over a few generations without anyone being aware except a very few, those who ask questions.


"America, love it or leave it," is a tired canard. One cannot leave it except at great cost. Recall that in 1860-1861 11 states attempted to "leave it" in order to preserve their liberty and rights as sovereign states. They were branded as "insurrectionists" and attacked by the War Party and the result was their economic and social destruction, subjugation and the deaths of some 850,000 people (the equivalent of about 8.5 million people today). When one talks of secession today he"s branded as a racist, crazy or a radical and told secession is "illegal."


One can love his country but hate his government and its actions. I love America but not the people who control America and its government. I love America, but its rulers are alien to individual freedom, its government now anathema to liberty.


If the flag is symbolic of government and that government lies at every turn, enslaves its people, steals from their labor, passes laws that are an execration to their Christian faith, takes from them their liberty, mandates the murder of 1 million babies a year, imports tens of thousands of immigrants to replace American workers and drive down wages, and that makes war on other countries that have not threatened us, why should any acknowledge its presence with more than a sneer?


Wars are not for patriotism and "democracy," as we are propagandized. And our freedom has not been threatened by outside forces in 200 years. Wars are to kill; i.e., mass ritual murder. Additionally, big business and globalist banksters in league with Satan reap massive profits for the killing and sacrifice of young men (lambs) on all sides of combat.


If the flag is symbolic of the Constitution, that Constitution died long ago — destroyed by a crony railroad lawyer and mercantilist who made war on a sovereign people to benefit monied interests.


If the flag is symbolic of freedom, that freedom no longer exists — stolen long ago by crony corporations and globalist banksters and unaccountable oligarchical black-robed satanists and idol worshippers who usurped their authority created laws out of thin air under the guise of "interpreting the Constitution" a dictate not granted them under the original document.


The phony form of patriotism instilled within the population is strong leverage against independent thinking, keeping people ignorant of the treason by our own government.


America today is a more advanced state of fascism than World War II Germany and Italy. Fascism never identifies itself as totalitarianism. It always calls itself democracy.


Democracy is the politically correct word and cover term for modern American fascism.


American fascism has all the attributes and trappings of benevolent totalitarianism. No, benevolent totalitarianism is not an oxymoron.


The word benevolent in this instance means that the general perception of the population of the American system is that it is benevolent. This is only to say that modern America is full-blown fascism with a pretty face. It is every bit as deadly to human liberty as any tyranny in history and I would add far more sinister because of its propaganda sophistication.


Any regime that can spin tons of fiat paper money with printing presses or electronically is a slave system regardless of what it calls itself or regardless of the general population"s perception of it.


Our mother has been transformed into a witch no matter how much we love her.

Former Democratic Congresswoman Urges All NFL Players To Kneel During National Anthem

Having left public office in January, former U.S. Congresswoman from Maryland, Donna Edwards, has decided to get involved in the current meme of the moment battle over respect and freedom of "speech" between President Trump and The NFL...



We have to admit we are a little confused.


We thought that if you disrespected anything American, you were automatically a "Russian puppet", but now it"s "cool" to bash America"s flag, its anthem, and The White House?



For some reason, Edwards decided to tweet this shortly after...



So do as I say, not as I do?


This seemed to sum up what we suspect will occur should this former congresswoman get her wishes...


Saturday, September 23, 2017

LeBron Calls Trump "Bum" For Withdrawing Steph Curry's White House Invite

Update: As one might have imagined, the responses to Trump"s comments have been far-ranging and explosive but perhaps the best known and most stunning was from LeBron James who called the president a "bum" for rescinding Curry"s invite (after Curry had he wouldn"t go)...



*  *  *


As we detailed earlier, The Golden State Warriors won another NBA Championship in June - their second in three years - defeating perennial rivals the Cleveland Cavaliers and cementing the team"s legacy as the best professional NBA franchise in recent memory. But since clinching the championship trophy, a dark cloud has been hanging over the Warriors: The traditional visit to the White House. Since June, it"s been unclear if the team would accept the invitation because of Curry and Co"s well-publicized distaste for the president. Finally, the ambiguity was put to rest on Friday, when Curry revealed that he would like the team to decline their invitation, saying he"d like to "inspire some change in terms of what we can tolerate in this country" by standing up to the Trump Administration. 


Needless to say, President Trump was displeased, and in a classic Donald Trump Saturday morning tweetstorm, the president blasted the star point guard for "hesitating" to accept the White House"s invitation, before adding that Curry"s invite had been "withdrawn":


"Being invited to the White House is considered a great honor," Trump tweeted. "Stephen Curry is hesitating, therefore invitation is withdrawn." As the Associated Press pointed out, it isn"t immediately clear if Trump rescinded the invitation to Curry, or the entire team.



Trump also ripped into another Bay Area athlete, former San Francisco 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick, last night, implying that the free agent QB is a "son of a bitch" for protesting the National Anthem. Trump"s impromptu attack came during a campaign rally for Alabama Senator Luther Strange, who is running in a closely contested special election to keep his seat, to which he was temporarily appointed after Jeff Sessions left the Senate to become the attorney general. During a rant in which he blasted NFL owners and players, Trump said any player who refuses to stand for the anthem "should be fired" for "disrespecting our heritage." He added that the first owner to fire an athlete for protesting would become "the most popular person in this country - for a week."  He urged fans to leave the stadium if they see players protesting, before declaring that American Football "is not the same game anymore, anyway."



Trump"s remarks elicited a response from the NFL player"s association, which said "We will never back down" from standing up to Trump. Predictably, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell fired back at President Trump in a statement issued Saturday morning. In the statement, he criticized Trump’s “divisive comments” about team owners firing player for protesting, saying they showed "an unfortunate lack of respect for the NFL." Of course, the hypocrisy in Goodell"s response to Trump is painfully obvious: After all, Kaepernick has effectively been blackballed from the league for his decision to protest.


Circling back to the Warriors, the question now is, if the White House clarifies that the withdrawal of the invite applies only to Curry, will the rest of the team back their star player and stay home? Or will a few decide to continue with the longstanding tradition of White House visits, potentially creating a rift.

NFL Chief Lashes Out At "Divisive, Disrespectful" Trump Over "Son Of A Bitch" Comment

Update: Trump"s comments have elicited some responses from NFL players also...


DeMaurice Smith, head of the NFL Players Association



Lesean McCoy of the Buffalo Bills



Eric Ebron of the Detroit Lions



Chris Conley of the Kansas City Chiefs



George Iloka of the Cincinnati Bengals



Richard Sherman of the Seattle Seahawks




*  *  *


As we detailed earlier, after warming up the Alabama crowd Friday night with a recitation of Trump’s Greatest hits (attacks on Hillary Clinton, intransigent Republicans in Congress and, of course, the president’s love of Roll Tide football), Trump abruptly went off on a tangent about the NFL and the growing number of players who are following former San Francisco 49ers back-up QB Colin Kaepernick in kneeling during the National Anthem, purportedly to protest racial injustice in the US.



In remarks that predictably provoked a chorus of outrage in the left wing media Saturday, Trump said that NFL owners should fire players like Kaepernick - whom the president implied was a "son of a b***h" for “disrespecting our heritage” by refusing to stand for the anthem – who engage in gametime protests, adding that any owner who did so would become “the most popular person in the country – at least for a week.” He then asked his supporters to leave the stadium if they see players protesting during games, adding that walkouts would force NFL franchise owners to confront the protests.





"When people like yourselves turn on television and you see those people taking the knee when they are playing our great national anthem – the only thing you could do better is if you see it, even if it"s one player, leave the stadium," Trump said. "I guarantee things will stop."



"I"d love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, "Get that son of a bitch off the field right now. He"s fired."




Of course, even the suggestion that the league engage in the active suppression of speech (as if it isn’t doing that already) was enough to provoke an outraged response from Commissioner Roger Goodell.



In a statement issued Saturday morning, Goodell said Trump’s “divisive” comments “demonstrate an unfortunate lack of respect for the NFL.”





“The NFL and our players are at our best when we help create a sense of unity in our country and our culture.  There is no better example than the amazing response from our clubs and players to the terrible natural disasters we"ve experienced over the last month. 



Divisive comments like these demonstrate an unfortunate lack of respect for the NFL, our great game and all of our players, and a failure to understand the overwhelming force for good our clubs and players represent in our communities.”



Unfortunately for Goodell, Trump has a point about the popularity (or rather, unpopularity) of political protests at sporting events, and their impact on the NFL’s ratings.


As Free Market Shooter pointed out in a Saturday post, ratings truly are down across the NFL, and surveys have suggested that the drop is tied to controversial protests, which have alienated many of the white, working-class fans that comprise the league’s fan base.


Though Colin Kaepernick is still unsigned by any NFL team, other players are continuing the “protest” trend that he started. However, since Kaepernick first refused to stand for the anthem last year, attendance at the team’s games, and its ratings, have declined.



A recent J.D. Power survey shows that the national anthem protests are directly to blame for declining ratings.


The group surveyed 9,200 fans (a sample of 1,000 is usually used in political polling), and 26% of them said they had turned the games off due to the national protests alone.


As Free Market Shooter concludes, at the end of the day, the NFL is facing a number of headwinds that have led to a decline in ratings.  High prices of the game itself, both for the home consumer and the fans in stadium seats, are certainly what gets the ball rolling on fans choosing to tuning out.  Combine that with questions on the quality of the game, accessibility, and a litany of other factors not mentioned here (including the commissioner’s punishments of players and concussion fears), and it seems the political antics of some players is just one of many aspects that has led to the NFL’s sharp ratings drop.


However, when a Trump-voting US military veteran is sitting at home, pissed off about how his team is 0-2, angry that his cable bill is eating into his disability payments, upset that the game “isn’t what it used to be,” and he turns on the game just before kickoff to see a player doing this while the National Anthem is being sung…



...it just might be the straw that breaks this guy’s back and gets him to tune out of this week’s game.  Given the NFL’s current predicament regarding viewership, political antics from players are the last thing the league needs right now. 


*  *  *


For anyone who has been following the Kaepernick saga, the hypocrisy in Goodell’s statement should be strikingly obvious. NFL owners have, in effect, already acquiesced to Trump’s demands that they fire protesting players: case in point, Kaepernick has been blackballed from the league after opting out of his contract with the 49ers back in March.


But then again, hypocrisy is nothing new to the NFL.
 

Sunday, August 20, 2017

Dozens of NYPD Cops Bravely Rally Behind Colin Kaepernick to Expose Police Brutality

kaepernick

New York, NY — Dozens of active and retired police officers turned out for a rally in New York on Saturday to make a powerful statement. The officers expressed their support for  Colin Kaepernick and his stance against the rampant racism and brutality among police departments from coast to coast.


Kaepernick, the former quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers, made his opinions well known last year when he began to take a knee during the national anthem. His freedom of speech and brave activism was hailed as heroic by some but hated by others.


Yes, Kaepernick chose not to stand for the national anthem. So what?


Americans were more outraged over a single NFL player’s personal decision than the oppressive and often criminal government who rules over them.


It is no secret that the war on drugs hits minorities, black people in particular, harder than their white counterparts. These forced confrontations in futile attempts to control what people choose to put in their own bodies all too often become harassing and violent.


Advertisment



Hundreds of thousands of otherwise entirely innocent people find themselves being shaken down, stopped and frisked, harassed, searched, and publicly humiliated as police search for arbitrary substances. The problem is very real and it needs to change. For trying to be a catalyst for the change, Kaepernick was all but tarred and feathered in the mainstream media.


However, some good cops in New York appear to be woke, and have refused to get on the bandwagon of shaming someone for standing up for what’s right.



READ MORE:  VIDEO: Cops Thought they Smelled Weed, So they Broke into a House & Terrorized the Occupants



Sgt. Edwin Raymond, the event’s organizer explained to the New York Daily News, “What Colin Kaepernick did is try to bring awareness that this nation, unfortunately, has ignored for far too long […] And that’s the issue of racism in America and policing in America. We decided to gather here today because of the way he’s being railroaded for speaking the obvious truth.”


In 2015, as the NY Times reported, Raymond joined 11 other officers in filing a class-action lawsuit against the Police Department for policing practices they said discriminated against minority communities.





“As members of law enforcement, we can confirm that the issues he is saying exist in policing, and throughout the criminal justice system, indeed exist,” Sergeant Raymond said of Kaepernick.


As the country publicly denounced Kaepernick’s stance on police brutality as “anti-cop,” those of us in the police accountability movement know it is a much bigger issue and is not based on simply hating the police. Kaepernick, just like we do here at TFTP, stands against corruption and violence in a system that unfairly punishes the poor and minorities. Only cops who uphold this corruption should have taken offense. Raymond points out this matter quite succinctly.


“They said he disrespected law enforcement,” Sergeant Raymond said. “Well, I’m law enforcement, and he didn’t disrespect me.”



Perhaps the most famous whistleblower cop of all time, Frank Serpico also showed up in support of Kaepernick. Serpico told that crowd, “I am here to support anyone who has the courage to stand up against injustice and oppression anywhere in this country and the world.”




Sadly, however, Raymond’s sentiment and the other NYPD officers who showed up to support Kaepernick seems to be held by only a handful of cops.



READ MORE:  Police In US Killed Over A Dozen People In Week Leading Up To Ferguson Verdict



Case in point, last year, the police union vowed to stop providing police services unless Kaepernick was silenced.


In a scathing letter, addressed to Jed York, the 49ers CEO last year, the Santa Clara Police Officer’s Association essentially issued an ultimatum demanding the team silence Kaepernick or lose their police service.


“If the 49ers organization fails to take action to stop this type of inappropriate workplace behavior, it could result in police officers choosing not to work at your facilities,” the letter read. 


For bravely crossing the blue line and having the courage to speak out against the corruption within, we applaud the men and women of the NYPD who showed up to Saturday’s rally. We hope that their courage serves as an example to other departments who could truly incite radical and peaceful change by simply speaking out.



Only when good people refuse to enforce bad laws will anything ever change.

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Confirmed: NFL Fans Tuned Out Last Year Because Players Protested The National Anthem

Authored by Kati Pavlich via Townhall.com,


The NFL took a massive ratings dive last year after a number of players, led by former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick, refused to stand for the National Anthem. At the time, NFL officials claimed they didn"t exactly know why ratings were down and even used the 2016 presidential election as an excuse for why more people weren"t watching. 



But according to a new survey from J.D. Power, NFL fans did in fact tune out in droves because of the disrespect and protest of the National Anthem before games. From ESPN





National anthem protests were the top reason that NFL fans watched fewer games last season, according to a new survey released by J.D. Power.



The pollster said it asked more than 9,200 people who attended either one football, basketball or hockey game whether they tuned into fewer games and why. Twenty-six percent of those who watched fewer games last season said that national anthem protests, some of which were led by Colin Kaepernick, were the reason.



After that, 24 percent of those surveyed who said they watched fewer games said they did so either because of the league"s off-the-field image issues with domestic violence or with game delays, including penalties.



After being dropped from the 49ers last year, sports pundits and fellow players have accused anyone and everyone of racism for Kaepernick"s failure to resign with another team. Turns out he"s not only a bad quarterback, but a business liability. 


Patriotism is still winning in America and that"s a good thing. Here"s to hoping this season comes with more respect on the field from players who are privileged to live in the greatest country on earth.

Monday, January 9, 2017

Kaepernick Sticks to $1mn Donation Pledge — Sends $50K to Standing Rock Health Clinic

San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick announced Friday he will donate $50,000 to the Mni Wiconi Health Clinic Partnership at Standing Rock in order to “offset salaries for doctors and nurses who work at the free clinic for those who have gathered to protest the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.”


In September, the athlete triggered factious debate when he took a knee during the national anthem over the issues of police brutality and oppression of minorities in the United States.


But it wasn’t a hollow act — the athlete also announced the formation of the Colin Kaepernick Foundation and set in motion a “Million Dollar Pledge” to give $100,000 each month for ten months to charitable organizations to “fight oppression of all kinds globally, through education and social activism.”



“I plan to take it a step further,” Kaepernick told the media following his quiet protest. “I’m currently working with organizations to be involved and making sure I’m actively in these communities, as well as donating the first million dollars I make this season to different organizations to help these communities and help these people.”


Now, the compassionate medical personnel at the Mni Wiconi Health Clinic — a partnership with the Do No Harm Coalition at the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) — will benefit significantly thanks to Kaepernick’s foray into activism. According to NBC’s CSN, half of the donation will offset their salaries, while the “remainder of the donation goes toward offsetting building materials for the mobile medical clinic, medical supplies and liability insurance.”


Thousands of water protectors remain camped in support of Standing Rock Sioux Tribe members fighting to halt Energy Transfer Partners’ construction of the contentious pipeline. Although water protectors — who include Indigenous peoples from hundreds of First Nations and tribes from around the world, as well as non-native allies — remain peaceful and prayerful, militarized law enforcement led by the Morton County Sheriff’s Department have used brutal and abhorrent force on a number of occasions.


From tear gas and pepper spray to rubber bullets, water cannons, and more, riot gear-clad police have seemingly employed every violent tactic imaginable against the unarmed water protectors — making medical staff an absolute necessity.


Two of the most horrific injuries occurred when police began attacking water protectors attempting to clear a blockade law enforcement erected at Highway 1806’s Backwater Bridge — an obstacle severely hindering the access of emergency personnel to the reservation and pipeline opposition camps — on the evening of November 20.


Militarized officers first fired rubber bullets, which attracted a crowd of around 400 irate but unarmed people. Police proceeded to unleash a barbaric show of disproportionate force, firing pressurized tear gas canisters, concussion grenades, mace, various ostensively less-than-lethal projectiles, and then — in conditions hovering well below freezing — doused the crowd with high-pressure water cannons.



During the attack, police fired a tear gas canister at a water protector known as Sioux Z, which exploded in her face, severing her retina — and it’s now highly unlikely she will regain vision in that eye. Another, Sophia Wilansky, had her arm blown apart when police launched what is believed to be either a concussion grenade or pressurized tear gas canister as she carried bottles of water to people on the front line.


Medics and first responders reported dozens of cases of hypothermia, around 20 hospitalizations, one cardiac arrest — and resuscitation — and hundreds of other injuries.


Kaepernick’s donation to the Mni Wiconi Health Clinic will help the medics attending those dedicated to protecting the Standing Rock Sioux’ water supply — but the clinic will continue after the encampments ultimately disband. According to the UCSF crowd-fund website,


“The Mni Wiconi (Water is Life) Health Clinic is a free integrative clinic that is developing with Standing Rock Sioux Tribe traditional healers, UCSF providers and students, National Nurses United, Changing Woman Initiative (indigenous midwifery group) and Global Health Care Alternative Project to provide free care to all people on tribal land in the Standing Rock Sioux reservation. At the invitation of the tribe, our consortium’s goal is to create a space for the imagining and practice of decolonized medicine in order to further the health of the community in the short-term with the expanded population due to pipeline resistance and in the longterm after the encampments have dissolved.”


Appetite for Change in Minneapolis — a group installing an urban community farm plot as part of its dedication to improving the nutrition of urban dwellers — received $25,000 as part of this month’s donation. SOUL of Chicago received the remaining quarter of Kaepernick’s funds, which will be allotted for Funding for Decarcerate Chicago, “a campaign to end mass incarceration and over-criminalization of communities of color in Illinois.”


As controversial a figure as the athlete might be, Colin Kaepernick continues to back up the vow to spread his wealth to groups fighting to improve communities around the United States.