Showing posts with label candy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label candy. Show all posts

Thursday, December 21, 2017

Are Governments Running Out Of Candy?

Authored by Jeff Thomas via InternationalMan.com,


By now, many readers will have seen the popular American YouTube video by Mark Dice in which he stands on a city sidewalk and offers passers-by a free gift. They may choose between a 10-ounce silver bar or a large Hershey’s candy bar.


Each taker chooses the candy - most of them with no deliberation. The only taker who seems to hesitate at all soon decides on the candy, as “I don’t have any way to do anything with the silver.” (Behind them is a coin shop. Mister Dice offers to take the silver bar inside if she wishes, but she’s uninterested and takes the candy.)


A 10-ounce silver bar is presently valued at about $140, the Hershey’s bar at about $2.


(Editor’s Note: If you have not seen the video, please see below.)



Mister Dice doesn’t comment in the video as to what lesson might be learned from this, but an obvious one would be that Americans (or at least those who reside in his home town of San Diego, California) are prone to prefer instant gratification over something of substantially greater, but delayed value.


If this is his intent, he’s succeeded well in his light-hearted, but instructive video.


Since the 1950’s, much of the world has perceived Americans as being on “Easy Street,” and in recent decades, the U.S. government has fuelled American complacency through a consciousness of easy money and entitlement.


And so, Americans are often perceived by those outside the U.S. as being somewhat insulated, spoiled, naïve, and short-sighted. But, if this is true, Americans certainly aren’t alone. Much the same exists in Europe, Canada, and quite a few other countries that have, over recent decades, followed the American socio-economic model.


Trouble is, all that easy money and entitlement exists only as long as a source for the “freebies” exists. Unfortunately, the idea that freebies are free is inaccurate. Freebies of any description must be paid for by someone.


In business, freebies are sometimes provided as “loss-leaders” to attract more business. They therefore become a line item on the monthly balance sheet, a cost-of-doing-business expense. The business hopes to make the loss back through sales generated by the loss-leader.


But, when governments hand out freebies, no sales will be generated, so the loss will not be recovered. When governments hand out freebies, the cost is paid with tax revenues. And when taxes have been raised to the point that further increases would be difficult without inciting rebellion, governments generally rely on borrowing.


But, of course, borrowing, too, eventually reaches the point that it has become so great that it cannot be repaid. What then?


Invariably, economic collapse is the outcome. But, why should this be so? Well, when the tipping point is reached (as in jurisdictions like the EU and U.S., where more than 50% of the public are net recipients and the other 50% must pay for both themselves and the other 50%), there’s no turning back. Those who have been receiving the candy have been told that they’re entitled to it and now they believe it. They will not tolerate the suggestion that the freebies must end, even though no further tax can be reasonably levied; no further funds can be borrowed. Therefore, in every case, the result is systemic collapse, not a gradual tapering off.


For thousands of years, governments have sought to appease people with freebies. In ancient Rome, a dole of grain and free entertainment (bread and circuses) helped to usher in the decline of the empire. Like all great empires, it collapsed under a weight of debt and mismanagement.


Much of the world is presently at this tipping point. Governments continue to promise benefits that they know will soon come to an end. If history repeats, they will continue repeating this promise right up until the day when the candy stops being dished out.


They will then say that no one could have seen this coming.


Amongst the public who will be the victims, there will be three general groups. First will be the Takers, those who have been the recipients who depended upon the freebies the most. They will be the hardest hit, as not only will they lose the freebies, they will have neither the skills nor the imagination to become self-reliant overnight.


The second group will be the Payers, those whose tax dollars paid for the freebies. They will be hard hit, as the system in which they live and operate has broken down, although they will fare better than the Takers. They will have the skills and imagination to rebuild their lives (having previously been productive enough to pay for themselves and others.)


Third will be the Preparers, those who envisioned the inevitability of the collapse of the system. They most certainly will have the skills and imagination to rebuild their lives, but, additionally, they’ll have the means with which to rebuild quickly. They will be the very few who chose the silver bar over the candy and had the wisdom to store the silver in a jurisdiction where it was not likely to be appropriated by a dying empire.


Much of the world is now running out of candy. The latest version of Bread and Circuses is reaching its inevitable end.


Replaying the video, we observe Mister Dice offering chocolate or silver. Each Taker looks at him incredulously, then makes the obvious choice, the candy. Each of them gives him a smile. Each is pleased to walk away with the chocolate, but, likely as not, each will have consumed the bar before the day is out and the benefit of the freebie will be short-lived.


After giving out eight bars, Mister Dice is all out of chocolate and he presumably goes home. He has no candy, but he does have 10 ounces of silver. Perhaps he owns other silver bars as well, stored in a safer jurisdiction.


Each of us has the opportunity to make a choice as to whether we wish to be Takers, Payers, or Preparers. The choice we make may define our future.


*  *  *


The U.S. government’s bad financial decisions and massive debt levels will cause another financial crisis sooner rather than later.


Like most governments that get into financial trouble, we think American politicians will keep choosing the easy option…money printing on a massive scale.


This has tremendous implications for your financial security. These politicians are playing with fire and inviting a currency catastrophe.


This is a big reason why we think everyone should own some physical gold and silver. Precious metals are the ultimate form of wealth insurance. They have preserved wealth through every kind of crisis imaginable. They will preserve wealth during the next crisis, too.


But, if you want to be truly “crisis-proof”, there is more to do...


Most people have no idea what really happens when a currency collapses, let alone how to prepare…


How will you protect your savings in the event of a currency crisis? This just-released video will show you exactly how. Click here to watch it now.









Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Marijuana in Halloween Candy Won’t Kill Your Kids, but the Sugar Might

(ANTIMEDIA) Every Halloween, warnings to parents sound the alarm on cannabis and other drugs ending up in their children’s candy. While these advisories rarely come to fruition, another dangerous substance is guaranteed to be in kids’ treats: sugar.


Though the link between sugar consumption and cancer has been increasingly established in recent years, researchers at KU University in Belgium published further evidence this month in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Communications.


According to a press release from VIB, a research institute affiliated with study researcher Johan Johan Thevelein, who co-founded the nine-year joint research project that released the findings:


“Scientists have clarified how the Warburg effect, a phenomenon in which cancer cells rapidly break down sugars, stimulates tumor growth. This discovery provides evidence for a positive correlation between sugar and cancer, which may have far-reaching impacts on tailor-made diets for cancer patients.”


Non-cancerous cells produce energy through aerobic respiration, which breaks down digested food into energy. Through this process, Northwestern University explains, “glucose is converted into CO2 and H2O in the presence of oxygen, releasing large amounts of ATP,”  adenosine triphosphate, often considered the “energy currency of life.”


In contrast, cancer cells obtain energy by fermenting sugar, even when ample oxygen is available. This process is called the Warburg effect.


According to Thevelein:


“Our research reveals how the hyperactive sugar consumption of cancerous cells leads to a vicious cycle of continued stimulation of cancer development and growth. Thus, it is able to explain the correlation between the strength of the Warburg effect and tumor aggressiveness. This link between sugar and cancer has sweeping consequences.”


Business Insider further explained how the study clarified the Warburg effect:


“The researchers behind the new study observed yeast cells in the lab, and found that their fermentation process — the same one that cancer cells prefer — actually stimulates tumor growth.


“Their findings suggest that the most common cancer-causing genes, called Ras proteins, fuel aggressive tumors with their sugar intake. In short, sugar ‘awakens’ existing cancer cells, making them multiply and expand rapidly, according to these scientists.”


Though the study was conducted in human cells, the researchers cautioned that the next step is to study actual patients in clinical trials before conclusions about treatment and diet can be made.


Nevertheless, sugar is also linked to other health ailments, including heart disease and obesity. According to the University of California San Francisco medical school, added sugars, which are “added in preparation of foods, either at the table, in the kitchen or in the processing plant,” and include sucrose and high fructose corn syrup, “ are  often overconsumed in the United States and pose a particular risk to children and teens.


“The U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend limiting total intake of discretionary calories, including both added sugars and fats, to 5% –15% per day,” UCSF explains. “Yet children and adolescents in America obtain about 16% of their total caloric intake from added sugars alone.”


Further, they note that “the average American consumes 19.5 teaspoons (82 grams) every day. That translates into about 66 pounds of added sugar consumed each year, per person.”


UCSF also points out that sugar may have addictive qualities:


“Using brain-scanning technology, scientists at the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse were among the first to show that sugar causes changes in peoples’ brains similar to those in people addicted to drugs such as cocaine and alcohol. These changes are linked to a heightened craving for more sugar. This important evidence has set off a flood of research on the potentially addictive properties of sugar.”


As parents prepare to take their children trick-or-treating, evidence suggests they should be far more concerned about conventional candy than weed-laced gummy bears.


Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo

The Real Reason Police Push Debunked ‘Drug-laced Candy’ Myth on Halloween

CANDYPolice fear mongering about drug-laced Halloween candy is back — in spite of the utter lack of evidence, this myth continues, here"s why.

Thursday, October 12, 2017

Town Bans The Tossing Of Candy In Parades Because Kids Might Get Hurt

Town Bans The Tossing Of Candy In Parades Because Kids Might Get Hurt

Image source: Flickr/Creative Commons



Overly aggressive trick or treaters have brought an end to a holiday tradition in West Chester, Penn.


Halloween Parade participants will no longer be able to toss candy to kids because – officials fear — they might fight over the candy and get hurt.


“They won’t have to struggle with other children who are trying to get the same thing,” Keith Kurowski, the director of the West Chester Parks and Recreation, told The Daily Local.


Put God Back Into History And Teach Your Kids What They Won’t Learn Anywhere Else!


Instead, candy will be handed out at four “distribution stations” to make sure every kid gets his or her fair share.


Kurowski blamed kids who were “overly aggressive getting to the freebies” for the change in procedure. Around 1,000 people usually take part in the parade, which has attracted up to 5,000 spectators in the past. Candy remains a big part of the fun.


“Candy is still going to be distributed on Halloween and for public safety reasons and the safety of our children it will be distributed differently,” Mayor Jordan Norley said. “Nonetheless, our children are going to have more sweets than they can eat.”


What is your reaction? Share it in the section below:

Sunday, October 30, 2016

Terrifying Toxic Chemicals To Avoid This Halloween

halloween-candy-toxic-poison-chemicals


Halloween is creeping near, are you prepared? Before you make a mad dash to the nearest costume shop, consider this—do you know what’s in your costume? Your masks and makeup?


Terrifying toxins! Catastrophic chemicals! Horrifying harbingers of–ok, alright. You probably get the idea. Festive Halloween accouterments can be loaded with harmful chemicals and toxic metals. It can be difficult to resist a low-price costume produced with cheaply-sourced goods, but there are a few good reasons why you should consider more than price when deciding which Halloween products to buy.


Chemicals in Costumes, Accessories, and Decorations


Costumes, accessories, and decorations from most major national Halloween retailers contain chemicals and additives that have been linked to health issues such as reproductive problems, developmental delays, and even cancer.[1]


PVC, Phthalates, and Dioxins


In one evaluation of nearly 150 Halloween products, one-third contained PVC (polyvinyl chloride), a known endocrine disruptor.[1] Additionally, PVC fabric is frequently treated with chemicals known as phthalates. Children are susceptible to the ill-effects of phthalates which include premature puberty, birth defects, liver problems, and testicular cancer later in life.[2] PVC products also contain dioxins, chemicals that are classified carcinogens and cause reproductive issues and learning delays.[3]


Lead Contamination


Lead is another toxin that often contaminates cheap foreign goods, especially Chinese imports, including food and children’s toys.[4] It shouldn’t be a surprise that lead’s insidious reach extends to Halloween products. In 2012, the US federal government seized over 1400 Halloween costumes of Chinese origin due to lead levels that were 10 times higher than the allowed maximum.[5] Many lead-contaminated costumes or props have a piece or two that will, at some point, find its way into a child’s mouth. The seized items included pirate costumes that had an eye patch that contained over 40 times the legal maximum limit for lead.[6]


Lead poisoning is exceptionally hazardous to children. It interferes with calcium, is toxic to proteins, and has a severely negative effect on nerve function. Exposure to lead is even linked to cognitive and hearing impairment. Lead exposure threatens fetal development as well. Pregnant women who have been exposed to lead may experience miscarriage, premature birth, or have undersized babies.[7]


Flame Retardants


Fabrics that have been treated with flame retardants are another concern with respect to Halloween costume safety. Such fabrics are often contaminated with antimony[8] and other dangerous chemicals. Exposure to antimony trioxide, a common flame retardant applied to fabrics, is linked to sharp increases in peripheral arterial disease (PAD),[9] which is a condition that causes atherosclerotic plaque to form in the arteries.[10] Some flame retardants are especially dangerous to children because their chemical structure is similar to developmental neurotoxins, like organophosphate pesticides, which affect brain development.[11]


Toxic Makeup and Glow Sticks


toxic-chemicals-makeup-2-300x200Many people don’t consider that the skin is their largest organ and one of the first contact points for toxins. Makeup, in general, is something to watch out for, as toxic metals frequently contaminate cosmetics.[12, 13] Some face painting kits for children also contain high levels of lead, arsenic, mercury, cadmium, and antimony, all of which are especially toxic to the kidneys and the immune, reproductive, and nervous systems.[14]


Glow sticks and glow jewelry seem like a harmless way to stay visible while trick-or-treating, but the chemicals in those plastic tubes do pose a threat. Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and anthracene, two chemicals found in glow sticks, can be poisonous. But, to be fair to glow sticks, the amount contained is usually too small to cause problems in humans. A more likely scenario is a child or pet getting DBP in their eyes, mouth, or on their skin. For children, the effects range from skin irritation or mild chemical burns to nausea and vomiting if ingested.[15] Pets have a similar reaction—they may drool profusely, retch, vomit, or paw at their mouths if they made the mistake of chewing on a stray glow bracelet.[16] A sick pet or child can ruin your evening, so forego the glow sticks or make sure no one tries to cut (or bite) them open.


How to Have a Healthy, Happy Halloween


We’re not here to ruin Halloween for you—we want you to have the safest, healthiest, and happiest Halloween possible! There are safe alternatives that render the hazardous options completely unnecessary. Of course, you could perform a full body detox, but reducing your exposure to toxins in the first place is a better strategy. When assembling your costume, examine the labels before purchasing. Or, better yet, make your own costumes and accessories yourself with non-toxic materials.


The Top 5 Ways To Ensure a Toxin-Free Halloween


  1. Look for makeup kits labeled non-toxic, and make sure they are produced in a country with strict regulations on consumer goods. Wash off makeup before bed.

  2. Wear a wig instead of temporary spray-on hair color, as they often contain VOCs.[17]

  3. Avoid plastic teeth as they tend to be softened with phthalates.[18]

  4. Check labels on costumes and accessories for vinyl (polyvinyl chloride or PVC) and flame retardants.

  5. Limit candy consumption, avoid corn syrup and synthetic food dyes.

Healthy Treats Are Important, Tootoxic-chemicals-healthy-food-300x200


Toxic costumes aren’t the only potential problem. Conventional Halloween fare is too sugary, over-processed, and full of preservatives and stabilizers. It’s difficult to resist all the Halloween cakes, cookies, and candy, but you can easily find recipes that recreate the traditional treats with legitimately healthy ingredients like cashews, chia seeds, and dark chocolate. Autumn is a time to be indulgent — in a healthy way. Try our dessert recipes for great-tasting and good-for-you alternatives, like the vegan custard-stuffed pumpkin.


Do you have any tips for enjoying a happy, healthy Halloween? Leave a comment below and share your thoughts.


References


  1. “Halloween Study.” 2014. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  2. Johnson. PVC – a major source of phthalates. n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  3. “Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) – toxic chemicals and environmental health risks where you live and work – text version.” 27 June 2016. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  4. Berman, Barry, and Kunal Swani. “Managing product safety of imported Chinese goods.” Business Horizons 53.1 (2010): 39–48. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  5. International, Public Radio. Chinese-made Halloween costumes recalled for high lead content. Public Radio International, 13 Oct. 2016. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  6. “Lead-contaminated pirate costumes seized.” NBCNews.com, n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  7. “Lead – toxic chemicals and environmental health risks where you live and work – text version.” 31 Mar. 2016. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  8. Cooper, Ross G., and Adrian P. Harrison. “The Exposure to and Health Effects of Antimony.” 13.1 (2009): n.pag. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  9. “The exposure to and health effects of antimony.” 13.1 (2009): n.pag. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  10. “What Is Peripheral Artery Disease? – NHLBI, NIH.” Google+, 22 June 2016. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  11. Grossman, Elizabeth. Are Flame Retardants Safe? Growing Evidence Says “No”. Yale environment 360. 2008. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  12. Troubling levels of toxic metals found in cosmetics. UC Berkeley School of Public Health, 2016. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  13. Bocca, B, et al. “Toxic Metals Contained in Cosmetics: A Status Report.” Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP. 68.3 (2014): 447–67. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  14. Schmidt, Sarah. Heavy metals found in kids’ face paints. www.canada.com, 1 Feb. 2009. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  15. Campbell, Olivia. Party Poopers: Are Glow Sticks Party Killers? 23 Sept. 2014. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  16. Coffin, Anna. 13 household items toxic to pets. 2016. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  17. “Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Commonly Used Products.” July 2013. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

  18. Reports, 2016 Consumer. Ten tricks for a safe and “green” Halloween. 23 Sept. 2014. Web. 13 Oct. 2016.

Print Friendly

Saturday, October 22, 2016

If You See Teal Pumpkins This Halloween, This is What it Means

Halloween is fast approaching, so you’re probably seeing pumpkins with all kinds of interesting carvings and elaborate colors. Gone are the days of simple jack-o-lanterns. Pinterest has put those to shame. But if you see a teal pumpkin, it has special meaning.

Teal-colored pumpkins signify participation with and support of the Teal Pumpkin Project, an initiative started by FARE (Food Allergy Research & Education), to provide children with food allergies a safe trick-or-treating experience. [1]


FARE Director of Communications Nancy Gregory said:




“The Teal Pumpkin Project promotes safety, inclusion and respect for all those managing food allergies.” [2]


If you spot 1 of these teal pumpkins, it means that this house is handing out non-food treats, such as pencils, stickers, bouncy balls and the like that will be safe for kids with food allergies.


The movement was started by 3 years ago by Becky Basalone, a Tennessee mom whose son has experienced anaphylaxis due to food allergies in the past.


She painted a pumpkin teal and stuck it on her front porch for the first time in 2012, and now tens of thousands of people do the same each year on trick-or-treat night.


Participating is simple, and you can still hand out candy for kids who don’t have allergies. First, obviously, paint a pumpkin teal or purchase 1 online or at a local store, and put it in front of your house. (Teal is the color for food allergy awareness.) You can also print out a free sign from the FARE website to show your involvement.


Then, take the pledge online and register your address on the official map of participating locations.


This year, FARE and Michaels Craft Stores are working together to help spread the message about the Teal Pumpkin Project and raise awareness about food allergies. If all goes according to plan, they hope there will be at least 1 teal pumpkin on every residential block in the U.S.


American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) statistics show food allergies affect about 8% of children. Food allergies among kids rose 18% from 1997-2007, according to a 2013 U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) study. [3]


Source: Children’s Hospital Colorado

Said Gregory:


“Chances are, there’s at least one child in your neighborhood or right down the block that lives with a potentially life-threatening food allergy.




Participating in the campaign is a simple way of including kids with food allergies or other dietary restrictions. Kids love getting a little prize or toy that they don’t have to give away because it could be harmful, and parents appreciate knowing there are homes with safe options in their neighborhood.”


Sources:


[1] The Huffington Post


[2] The Huffington Post


[3] New York Post


Today


Children’s Hospital Colorado


Storable Food


About Julie Fidler:


Author Image
Julie Fidler is a freelance writer, legal blogger, and the author of Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or the Absolute Worst. She lives in Pennsylvania with her husband and two ridiculously spoiled cats. She occasionally pontificates on her blog.

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

U.K. Government Orders Restaurants to Cut Size of Desserts

U.K. Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has ordered restaurants, pubs, and cafes to make their food and drink healthier by cutting sugar content, and to shrink the size of desserts. [1]

It’s all part of Britain’s plan to combat obesity.




Hunt met with more than 100 major food chains, including McDonald’s, Gourmet Burger Kitchen, Starbucks, and Pizza Express, and warned them that each restaurant’s performance would be monitored and that a public campaign would name any violators. 


Hunt said:


“Going out to eat is no longer a treat. It’s a regular habit for many families and is contributing significantly to the extra calories and sugar that we all consume on a daily basis.


We can’t ignore the changing habits of consumers. This means we expect the whole of the out-of-home sector – coffee shops, pubs and family restaurants, quick service restaurants, takeaways, cafes, contract caterers and mass catering suppliers – to step up and deliver on sugar reduction.” [2]


He also told meeting attendees that people are consuming 1/5 of their sugar intake outside the home and 1/4 of families take children to eat at fast food joints each week.


Duncan Selbie, chief executive of Public Health England, said:


“We need a level playing field — if the food and drink bought in cafes, coffee shops and restaurants does not also get reformulated and portions rethought then it will remain often significantly higher in sugar and bigger in portion than those being sold in supermarkets and convenience shops.


This will not help the overall industry to help us all make healthier choices.” [3]


Read: Experts Agree – Sugar Is a Health Destroyer




Additionally, Hunt wants restaurants to join supermarkets and food companies in their efforts to tackle the obesity crisis facing the country. [1]


Supermarkets and manufacturers have both also been ordered to reduce sugar in key products by 20% over the next 5 years – a plan deemed “weak” by critics.


Currently, 2 out of 3 British adults are overweight or obese, and the health secretary fears the cost of treating obesity-related illnesses could bankrupt the nation’s National Health Service (NHS).


The government wants sugar reduced in the following nine categories:


  • cereal

  • breakfast foods

  • yogurts

  • cookies

  • cakes

  • candy

  • desserts

  • ice cream

  • spreads [1]

It will be up to the industry to determine how to proceed and meet the new stringent requirements. The government has promised to check in on the industry’s progress every six months. If by 2020 things are not moving at a suitable speed, the government says it will “add other levers to achieve the same aims.”


Britons will even be able to check up on the companies through a website.


Earlier this year, the U.K. government announced that it would levy a sugar tax on soft drinks beginning in 2018. [4]


Source: Mirror

The U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne told the House of Commons at the time:


“I am not prepared to look back at my time here in this Parliament, doing this job and say to my children’s generation… I’m sorry. We knew there was a problem with sugary drinks. We knew it caused disease. But we ducked the difficult decisions and we did nothing.”


Under the levy, drinks with more than 8 grams of sugar per 100 milliliters will be taxed at a higher rate than beverages with less than 5 grams of sugar per 100 milliliters.


The tax won’t apply to other sugary drinks, such as fruit juices.


Sources:


[1] Fox News


[2] Mirror


[3] The Huffington Post U.K.


[4] The Sydney Morning Herald


Mirror



Storable Food


About Julie Fidler:


Author Image
Julie Fidler is a freelance writer, legal blogger, and the author of Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or the Absolute Worst. She lives in Pennsylvania with her husband and two ridiculously spoiled cats. She occasionally pontificates on her blog.