Showing posts with label IT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IT. Show all posts

Sunday, December 24, 2017

So Which Is It?

(As a reminder, you can get free, real-time crypto charts in SlopeCharts).


Forty thousand dollars per bitcoin. One hundred thousand. Three hundred thousand. The predictions are as numerous as the people making them.


I don"t pretend to know which one is going to be reality, and neither should anyone else. I do find the simplified presentation of price movements during manias to be an interesting road map, however. We all know that last week cryptos went crazy, with some losing more than half their value. On Friday, and into this weekend, they are beginning to strengthen, and I suspect many crypto-bulls have heaved a sigh of relief and are comforted by the fact this was just another one of those scary downturns. They don"t say HODL for nothing, you know.


phases


The zealots, I imagine, would point to the green tinted area I"ve highlighted above as the current state of affairs. That is, we"re still in the "awareness phase", and, yeah, there was a sharp, scary selloff, but all it"s going to mean is that the pantywaists aren"t going to stick around for the man-sized gains.


Maybe. Maybe not.


To my mind, it"s also plausible that what we saw was more along the lines of the cyan-tinted zone. What happens to cryptos this week might be an important "tell" in that respect.


If prices continue to stabilize and eventually bolt past the lifetime highs we saw not long ago, it will simply egg on the crypto crowd, because it will be the umpteenth example that selloffs are temporary and, for the bold, buying opportunities. They can all get back to the game of seeing Who Can Utter The Most Outlandish Prediction.


On the other hand, if the cryptos can"t muster their way past those highs - - if, instead, they stall out, start to weaken and.......gasp.......slip before the selloff levels we witnessed late last week, it"s going to stoke the flames of fear flickering from Friday.


btc


I"m somewhat in the "Post-New Paradigm" camp, myself, and would humbly suggest comparing the price chart above (and its tint) to the earlier diagram.

Wednesday, November 15, 2017

Why We"re Buying Physical Gold with a $1700 Target

Originally on marketslant.com


For What it is Worth: We are buying Gold in our small family fund. This is a trade, not an investment. Potentially a much longer term trade for us than normal, possibly a 12 month hold as opposed to our 3 day positions. We are buying physical in quantities that will not need to be sold if we are wrong, thus no leverage. We will also be swing trading gold with an upward bias as our indicators dictate below $1260 or above $1306.


Target  picking is risky in an asset whose value is largely based on sentiment and prone to being "jawboned" into its proper place. But we believe for various reasons that if Gold does not pierce $1260 spot, its chances of a rally topping between $1450 and $1700 are strong over the next 12-18 months. The wide target range reflects the emotional factor in Gold"s behavior far outweighing supply, production costs, and its lack of fundamentals to measure using tools like EBITDA, PE, and cash flows. And our own analysis is corroborated from several different disciplines from whom we did not seek out to rationalize. It"s a trade, that"s all. But it"s a very good and very rare risk reward trade. it has set up right now. Further, it will either be violently and decisively confirmed (or negated) above $1306 or below $1260.


Why are we sharing this? That same question should be asked of Ray Dalio, Jeff Gundlach and others who announce they are bullish on Gold after they have  bought. Our own position is not relevant to the market overall and we do not need to market our tiny positions to create an exit strategy a la George Soros.  The premise for the trade happens so rarely its worth writing about, if for no other reason as an exercise in outsourcing our self-discipline on the trade. 


Vince Lanci for SKG


vlanci@echobay.com 


Here is how  we came to be this way.


Step 1: Volatility is Coiling


When trading short term periods, intraday and intraweek, we use a volatility system for alerts to incipient movement. We risk 1 to make 2 and move  on when wrong. It works about 50% of the time. it is net profitable. And best of all, positions that are in limbo are closed expeditiously. This is after all a volatility system. No vol, no position. It"s been cited here many times in the past. When it is right, it is very right. when it is wrong, you are out. Past posts and a 25 year track record of use bear this out from our active days.  The bottom of this post goes into more detail on its use.


What we never did at Echobay or its predecessor fund CIS Energy, was use it on long term charts. We certainly looked at them, but only for bias in shorter term trades.  Last month we took a serious look at our VBS algorithm on a monthly chart. Here is what we found:


Updated from : Gold Macro Analysis: A November to Remember


Gold has a  tremendous risk reward setting up above $1306 or below $1260..... which way from there is not known but can be handicapped once either number is breached



for a nexplanation of VBS see bottom Appendix


Step 2: How Equity Funds Play Gold


Portfolio managers at large equity funds who have contributed here anonymously use systems that advise them when being in cash as opposed to long stocks is prudent. What is also known is that funds like these  punt gold positions with their discretionary in-house money for fun.


They use similar systems for entry and exit, and never risk much in their positions. Gold is a hobby to these guys. As a result, they like to buy and walk away with long term trade orientations and firm stops. This means using long  term moving averages to avoid noise. We know this is true.  And here is an example of how that type of positions is implemented:


 In a recent interview a vocal critic of the Gold industry explained why he was buying Gold








…Gold is poised to close above its 12-month moving average for the second straight month. Going back to 1970, the average monthly return for gold following a close above the 12-month moving average is 1.47%. The average monthly return following a close below the 12-month moving average is -0.15%.



If you used the simplest of trend-following methods, investing in gold when it was above its 12-month moving average, and going to cash when it is below, the results would have been far better than just buying and holding gold. He continues:








The chart below shows when you would have been invested in gold and when you would have been out. Granted, prior to GLD, this could only have been done with futures contracts, or gold bullion, with the former adding a degree of leverage that I would not have been comfortable with, and the latter adding a degree of paranoia that also would have made me uncomfortable.


Full post : Vocal Critic Explains Why He is Buying Gold



About Physical vs. ETF: While we agree with the rationale behind GLD vs futures if you are trading and not investing, we feel for multiple reasons the physical gold market is going to open up and become a serious competitor to ETF allocations within 12 months. Specifically, blockchain products are coming,  and if properly implemented as a pipeline, owning physical gold not held in trust by a GLD custodian will be as easy as clicking a mouse. You will buy and sell physical Gold that will be yours and verified via the blockchain system.


So for us, physical gold now has the benefit of increased  liquidity on the horizon, which means increased transactions and exposure. Which ultimately means decentralization of the Gold market from a few large firms to grass roots stackers, owners, and value preservers. We view emerging technologies as putting physical assets in a position to  have their true value unlocked. Whether that be the tea farmer in India who can"t currently get a loan on his land due to government rules, to Silver whose value is somewhat disconnected from its  price. The effect will not be unlike when a private company goes public. Accessibility and liquidity creates safety and increases demand. Owning physical metals is like owning a beneficiary of technology down the road.


Monthly Chart Through July 2017 using the 12 Month MA described above



 


Step 3: Optimizing the Simple 12 month MA Tool


by optimizing the MA with one factor we back tested greater successes when in trades. Conversely, we were also in less trades. On balance it was a wash. But right now the employed filter says the 12 Month MA has bigger upside than the average if profitable at all. A rare chance to buy close to the level the fund punters did with a statistical chance of greater profits than the  1.47% monthly average  generated by the original backtest.


Updated and Optimized by the Author



 


The chart below shows the hypothetical results from each of the 30 exits following an entry (going back to 1970). Using these rules would have resulted in a loss two-thirds of the time. But as you can see, the losses have been relatively shallow, not exceeding 10%, while the gains have been good to extraordinary.



Step 4: Using VBS for Confirmation of Direction


Simply put: If we get a VBS signal trigger when $1306 trades, a decision must be made to add, sell, or hold based on the data that comes with the signal. If we get one on a $1260 print, the same must be assessed. 


 


Step 5: Actions


  1. We are buying Gold now based on the "Fund Finder" signal with a monthly stop out below the yellow line in that chart above.

  2. $1306- we will consider adding a shorter term amount in a rally if the monthly VBS is triggered higher

  3. $1260-  we will consider either adding physical, or selling paper Gold for swing trading purposes if the VBS is triggered lower.

  4. Per #1- we will close or hedge the first physical purchased on a monthly settlement below $1244 - the wide berth on monthly exits necessitates no leverage 

 


Bonus: Moor Analytics comes to a similar conclusion from a different perspective.


Moor Analytics: Gold Downside May Finally be Exhausted








Within the overall bearishness I noted that a possible area of exhaustion for this move down from 13624 comes in at 12732-644.  We basically held this, but with a $1.6 violation, and rallied to 13084 before rolling over and rejecting from it again (although this time down the 12628 was simply support, not exhaustion)



And Michael"s most recent weekly report of Nov. 10th


Via Moor Analytics:








I would note that we broke above a well-formed macro line in the week of 8/7 that came in at 12629. The

break above here projects this upward $183 minimum, $501 (+) maximum—the maximum to be attained likely within 9-12

months. This line comes in at 12357 today. I am late to the game on this, but we were only $18 from the original breakout

when I mentioned this, and have a lot of room to go in the projection.



 


Appendix


 


What is VBS?


  • Volatility Based Risk Reward Generator

+ Originally developed as an alert to when the risk of being short implied volatility is larger than being long it, and vice-versa

+ It is a probability model that handicaps risk reward

+ As a by-product of its original purpose, it gives risk/reward scenarios in market direction. 

+ Due to its accuracy in predicting volatility expansion, directional applications are right or wrong quickly and is very useful in efficient use of capital


 


How VBS Works


  • Time is precious, Price is noisy, Volatility is less so.

+Volatility is less noisy than price, therefore more reliable as an indicator. 

+Volatility cycles more cleanly and  can be seen to "inhale and exhale" when viewed graphically with Bollinger Bands

+VBS is based on several relationships between historical and implied volatility  across different time frames

+ It can  be applied by traders on any time frame


 


VBS and Direction


  • It doesn"t predict price, only speed of movement

+It gives non-directional alerts and was initially developed for optimizing option portfolio risk.

+While not predictive directionally, VBS gives as a by-product excellent risk-reward setups for directional plays


 


VBS Process


  • Radar, Alert, Trigger, Entry, Exit

  1. Radar- VBS generates 2 prices, one above and one below current prices for a "breakout" in market volatility 

  2. Alert- One of the prices is breached and closes its bar/ candle beyond that price level.

  3. Trigger- Real volatility will expand
    • Market direction does not have to continue in the direction the price in #1 was broken

    • volatility based risk- reward prices are generated for directional use. I.E. Risk 1 to make 2


  4. Entry- using the  VBS risk/ reward generated levels, a decision is made to either go with the directional trend, against it, or do nothing
    • The trigger gives 2 bites at the apple if the trader so desires.

    • In "first way, wrong way" scenarios reversal levels are generated (N.B.- our preference is to not play the reversal and have left money on the table in favor of the trauma of being "chopped up". if compelling, we have used options to remain in the game on reversals)


  5. Exit- is either from a stop-out, a profit capture, or a time limit
    •  Stop-Loss- are generated by VBS and adhered to religiously. Profitable trades trail stops higher based on expanding volatility

    • Profits- exits can be subjective, we prefer taking 90% of position at target and leaving a tail if the VBS is not signalling Vol is overbought

    • Time Exit- trades  that are neither profitable  nor stopped out are exited  in 3 bars/ candles. The signal is designed for quick confirmation / rejection of the trigger


Good Luck


About the Author: Vince Lanci has 27 years’ experience trading Commodity Derivatives. Retired from active trading in 2008, Vince now manages personal investments through his Echobay entity. He advises natural resource firms on market risk. He pioneered and executed the Nat Gas EOO arbitrage trade of 2006 to 2008, netting over $90MM for a NYC hedge fund before retiring. Over the years, his expertise and testimony have been requested in energy, precious metals, and derivative fraud cases. Lanci is known for his passion in identifying unfairness in market structure and uneven playing fields. He is a frequent contributor to Zerohedge and Marketslant on such topics. Vince contributes to Bloomberg and Reuters finance articles as well. He continues to lead the Soren K. Group of writers on Marketslant.


vlanci@echobay.com 









Saturday, August 12, 2017

Nikki Barnes wants Debbie Wasserman Schultz ousted from DNC amidst fraud scandal


Will the deep state protect Debbie Wasserman Schultz over the latest fraud scandal which involves an IT staffer formerly on her payroll?







WASHINGTON (INTELLIHUB) — Democratic National Committee member Nikki Barnes told Fox Business on Friday that she wants Debbie Wasserman Schultz ousted from the DNC altogether after Wasserman Schultz’ IT staffer Imran Awan was arrested on fraud charges just before he attempted to flee the U.S in late July.


As Intellihub already reported:



The Pakistani-born information technology staffer is at the center of a criminal probe which may link others, possibly even the Florida Congresswoman.


The foreign national allegedly billed the U.S. government and may have profited off of the scheme along with others who are potentially involved.


“Awan is accused of attempting to defraud the Congressional Federal Credit Union by obtaining a $165,000 home equity loan for a rental property, which is against the credit union’s policies since it is not the owner’s primary residence. Those funds were then included as part of a wire transfer to two individuals in Faisalabad, Pakistan,” according to Politico.



The DNC member told Fox Business:


“What happened with that young man and that laptop, all of that investigation, we want to make sure that’s properly handled. That any information that may need to be discussed or investigated, that’s handled by the authorities and that is handled with the House and that’s taken care of appropriately. […] We don’t want that in the media. We don’t want Debbie doubling down on that stuff. We want to make sure that what’s in the media is we are taking care of the people who elected us… We want in the media the people’s platform.”


Featured Image: Medill DC/Flickr

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.



Friday, July 7, 2017

House Democrat IT Suspects Wanted Untraceable Payments…



House Democrat IT Suspects Wanted Untraceable Payments…



…And Sure Enough, Millions Disappeared


Luke Rosiak – 07/05/2017


A Pakistani family under criminal investigation by the U.S. Capitol Police for abusing their access to the House of Representatives information technology (IT) system may have engaged in myriad other questionable schemes besides allegedly placing “ghost employees” on the congressional payroll.


Imran Awan, his wife Hina, and brothers Abid and Jamal collectively netted more than $4 million in salary as IT administrators for House Democrats between 2009 and 2017. Yet the absence of signs of wealth displayed among them raise questions such as was the money sent overseas or did something other than paychecks motivate their actions?


Capitol Police revoked the Awans’ access to the congressional IT system in February 2017 after a major data breach was detected. Their access had allowed them to read emails and files of dozens of members, including many serving on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.


House Democrats have been nonchalant about the allegations, with some saying it was just a misunderstanding or the Capitol Police framed the Awans due to Islamophobia.



But official documents, court records and multiple interviews suggest the crew may have engaged in tax fraud, extortion, bankruptcy fraud and insurance fraud and the money could have been funneled overseas. Abid has hired high-profile attorney James Bacon who specializes in anti-money laundering litigation.



The Awans share modest homes, drive unremarkable cars and report little in the way of assets on congressional disclosures. The family owns significant amounts of Virginia rental properties, which are heavily financed, with second mortgages sometimes taken out. It’s unclear where the rental income goes because the Awans insist tenants pay in odd ways.


The Daily Caller News foundation interviewed multiple current and former tenants who said Imran insisted rent be paid in untraceable ways. Many of those TheDCNF interviewed about the Awans asked not to be identified for fear of suffering retaliation by the family, particularly renters to whose homes Imran has keys.


“He only wants cash — for the security deposit, everything. The mortgage is probably $600, we pay $1,800 a month,” one said.


“I would write the rent to all sorts of different people,” another claimed. While still another tenant said the family insisted on blank money orders.


Those interviewed also were puzzled that Congress kept the Awans on the payroll full-time when the family spent months of the year in Pakistan.


The four Awans were each making approximately $160,000 a year on Capitol Hill. Other House IT workers told TheDCNF that the Awans appeared to hold no-show jobs, with bare-bones services provided, and it appeared one person was doing the work for the rest of them.




More at the Daily Caller: http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/house-dem-it-suspects-wanted-untraceable-payments-and-sure-enough-millions-disappeared/




If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, 
please consider making a

donation to support our work.  You can 
donate HERE.

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

House Hacking Suspects Could Read Every Email Dozens Of Congressmen Sent And Received



House Hacking Suspects Could Read Every Email Dozens Of Congressmen Sent And Received



By Luke Rosiak – 03/13/2017



Congressional IT staffers who are the subject of a criminal investigation into misusing their positions had full access to members’ “correspondence, emails, confidential files,” and there was almost no tracking of what they did, a former House technology worker said.



Imran Awan bullied central IT to bend the rules for him so there wouldn’t be a paper trail about the unusually high permissions he was requesting. And their actions were not logged, so members have no way of knowing what information they may have taken, the central IT employee said.


Awan ran technology for multiple House Democrats, and soon four of his relatives–including brothers Abid and Jamal–appeared on the payroll of dozens of other members, collecting $4 million in taxpayer funds since 2010.


U.S. Capitol Police named him and his relatives as subjects of a criminal probe on Feb. 2, and banned them from the complex’s computer networks. But members of Congress for whom they worked have downplayed their access or publicly ignored the issue.




“They had access to EVERYTHING. Correspondence, emails, confidential files – if it was stored on the Member system, they had access to it,” the former House Information Resources (HIR) technology worker with first-hand knowledge of Imran’s privileges told The Daily Caller News Foundation.



Technology employees who work for members must initially get authority from HIR, a component of the House’s chief administrative officer, which maintains campus-wide technology systems.


“There were some things – like access to the House email system that were totally controlled by the technicians at HIR. In order for certain permissions to be granted, a form was required to ensure that there was a paper trail for the requested changes. Imran was constantly complaining that he had to go through this process and trying to get people to process his access requests without the proper forms. Some of the permissions he wanted would give him total access to the Members’ stuff.”



“IT staff at HIR can be tracked for every keystroke they make,” the worker said. But by comparison, “when these guys were granted access to the Member’s computer systems there is no oversight or tracking of what they may be doing on the Member’s system. For example they could make a copy of anything on the Member’s computer system to a thumb drive or have it sent to a private server they had set up and no one would know.”




That raises questions about why members are so quick to brush off the seriousness of the investigation.






Read more at: THE DAILY CALLER




If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution
against all enemies,  foreign and domestic, please consider making a donation to support our work.   You can donate HERE.