Seattle Police Begin NAZI STYLE Gun Confiscation: No Laws Broken, No Warrant, No Charges

A man in Seattle has had his gun confiscated by police after breaking no laws. The police took his gun without a warrant and without pressing any charges.  Tyranny has officially taken hold on American soil.

This sets a precedent that government can now forcefully take guns away from an individual without a crime being committed or an arrest being made and without a warrant. In the name of fear and political exploitation of anti-gun rhetoric, a citizen’s Second Amendment rights have been ripped away from him by the government.

The new “red flag” law, which has taken hold in other states already, allows the courts and law enforcement to take away guns from individuals they deem are dangerous and they’ve just begun the confiscation. A man living in the Belltown neighborhood of Seattle, Washington became the first individual in the state to have his firearm confiscated without any formal arrest or charges.  The man was not identified by authorities.

Neighbors complained that the man had been “staring” at people through storefront windows while wearing a holstered firearm. He was not brandishing his weapon by any account, and open carrying is legal in the area, so he was abiding by the law. Other residents also complained that the man’s open carrying made them feel “uncomfortable” and “unsafe.”

“He was roaming the hallways with a .25 caliber automatic,” said Tony Montana, a man who lives in the same apartment complex as the gun owner and a person without any reasonable gun knowledge.  Handguns are semi-automatic.

These lousy complaints from neighbors allowed police to use the newly passed state law to confiscate the man’s firearm because the man apparently stared at others.  Maybe there’s a ban on staring at others in Washington we are unaware of. Under the extreme risk protection orders — also referred to as “erpos” or “red flag laws” —  police (government officials) are now allowed to violate a person’s Second and Fourth Amendment rights (which are basic fundamental human rights) and take their legally acquired personal property if they are tattled on by offended liberals.

Tyranny has now taken hold on American soil.

84yo Holocaust Survivor Abused by TSA Draws Ominous Parallel With Her Time in Auschwitz

An 84-year-old grandmother and holocaust survivor says her treatment by the TSA was so bad that even though she survived Auschwitz, she barely survived the TSA.

The post 84yo Holocaust Survivor Abused by TSA Draws Ominous Parallel With Her Time in Auschwitz appeared first on The Free Thought Project.

Health Ranger: The Left Is An ‘Obedience Cult’

Mike Adams, The Health Ranger, has come out and said what many are thinking. He says the left has become an “obedience cult,” and there’s probably a reason for that.

Militant leftists have been known for shutting down the speech of conservatives or others that don’t agree with their authoritarian ways. But when the government is your god, and someone dares suggest an alternative, you’re vilified and ostracized. Current leftism in America is “a legitimate comparison to the rise of the Nazi state in Germany,” says Adams.

Nazi stands for “national socialist.” It was a socialist regime that gave rise to Adolf Hitler and the hundreds of thousands of order followers who executed on demand. “Under the Nazi regime, you had to be obedient to the state and the media. And the media, of course, functioned as just an extension of the state,” said Adams. And we are seeing these parallels now. People honestly think they cannot survive with the government. That’s actually pretty terrifying when you stop and ponder those implications.

“Under Nazism, there was tremendous peer pressure. You had to go along with the Nazis in order to be accepted to be able to move up into high society…they thought they were better than everyone else, thus, the idea that they had of a ‘master race’ or a ‘superior civilization’ made sense to them. Now that is exactly reflecting what you see in the left across America today.” Adams used Jimmy Kimmel as an example. Kimmel was asked why all late-night TV shows are hosted by leftists, and Kimmel replied that Republicans aren’t smart enough to host those types of shows.

This thinking that others are somehow more stupid or less of a human being for disagreeing or not showing the god-government the right respect is exactly how a genocidal mindset forms.  Anyone who isn’t a leftist is considered to be an “inferior race” and we’ve seen how the left reacts and can watch this play out in the media.

“Think about this too,” says Adams. “The Nazis justified their genocide of reportedly 6 million Jews by saying to themselves they thought they were the ‘master superior race’ and they thought Jews were inferior. Thus, they wanted to, in their minds, clean up their human ‘master race’ that they were trying to put into a utopia. Utopian Nazi civilization that’s radical left-wing fascism. But to do that, they had to eliminate certain groups of people and Jews were one of those groups.”

In the United States, you are seeing leftists call for the execution and murder of individuals they don’t like. And it’s setting a horrifying precedence; so much so, that we may be doomed to repeat history.

Camp Algiers: The US Internment Camp America Erased from History That Held Nazis & Jews

As neo-Nazis face off against AntiFa at various protests across the country, the media fanfare often leaves the public asking how much free speech groups should be allowed when it comes to their extreme beliefs. Advocates of freedom will argue that free speech extends to all, no matter how abhorrent their beliefs—but to truly see the reality of what occurs when groups are targeted for their suspected beliefs, just look at history.

After the Pearl Harbor attack occurred on Dec. 7, 1941, tens of thousands of Japanese Americans were forced into internment camps, based solely on their heritage. The Roosevelt Administration did not stop there, and a significant portion of its wrath was carried out in another camp that is not mentioned in most history textbooks: Camp Algiers.

Camp Algiers was located in New Orleans, and while it was labeled as an internment camp for Nazi sympathizers from Latin America, a large percentage of the detainees were Jewish. The camp’s legacy was detailed in a report by WWNO, New Orleans Public Radio.

Advertisment

Max Paul Friedman, a history professor at American University and an expert on the Latin American deportation operation during WWII, told WWNO that with over 1.5 million Germans lived in Latin America in the early 1940s, and the Roosevelt Administration made a case for the idea that “some of them might be Nazi agitators and even saboteurs and spies who could conceivably rise up and overthrow governments, and open up another front.”

Friedman said FBI agents were sent to Latin America and ordered to find “dangerous Nazis” to fill the internment camp. However, because “the best people were busy where the war really was, or security at home,” the agents who were sent had little knowledge of Spanish or German, yet they were tasked with finding and arresting suspected Nazis.

READ MORE:  As Thousands Left Homeless from Hurricanes, Trump Sends $75 Million MORE to Israel

The FBI agents would “open wallets and offer to pay for information for anybody who would announce a Nazi,” according to Friedman. As a result, they “created a system that was riven with corruption where some of the Latin American dictators would say ‘oh you want Nazis? Well this guy who owns a farm next to my farm, he’s a Nazi.’ and they would deport some of their own residents to seize their property.”

Abandoned Southeast noted that the program behind finding candidates for Camp Algiers was called the Enemy Alien Control Program, which was an illegal, secretive program run by the State Department. At the time, it was against the law in the U.S. for the government “to seize individuals outside of the country.”

“The State Department was able to get around this by refusing to issue entry visas for the Latin American deportees,” the report from Abandoned Southeast claimed. “When they arrived to the Port of New Orleans without papers, they were denied visas. They were arrested on grounds they attempted to enter the country illegally, and were imprisoned at Camp Algiers.”

The immoral way the government found its newest victims for this secret was one thing, but the locations where these refugees were coming from was also an important factor. Approximately 81 Jews were included in the line-up, and Harvey Strum, a faculty member at the Sage College of Albany told WWNO that “not only were many of these people rounded up between 1941 and 1943 innocent, they were the victims,” and many of them had come to the U.S. for refuge after surviving concentration camps in Europe.

READ MORE:  BREAKING: Russia Halts Cooperation with US in Syria, Citing US Support for ISIS - Will "Intercept Any Aircraft"

Camp Algiers housed around 5,000 people—made up of both innocent people the U.S. arrested and detained illegally, and innocent people who came to the U.S. seeking refuge. While the idea that the U.S. would subvert its own constitution to arrest foreign citizens who had never been charged with a crime is one thing, the idea the U.S. government would take innocent citizens who had survived concentration camps and make them share bunk beds with people who agreed with their inhumane treatment in Germany, is a crime in and of itself.

It is no secret that the version of World War II taught in public schools today white-washes the role the United States played and leaves out significant details, which makes it all the more important that Americans begin speaking up and sharing the stories of what happens when the U.S. government uses fear to justify violating the First and Fourth Amendments.

Declassified CIA Docs Reveal Hitler Survived WW2, With Picture to Prove it

Washington, DC – Newly declassified CIA files seem to confirm certain FBI documents related to Adolf Hilter, which claimed the Nazi Fuehrer escaped Germany and took up residence in South America after World War II.

The files indicate that in 1955, the chief of the CIA’s Western Hemisphere Division (WHD) received a secret memo with the subject line “Operational: Adolf Hitler,” from the acting CIA station chief in Venezuela, which indicated that one of his sources had received a tip that the Nazi Fuhrer was indeed alive and living in Argentina.

Interestingly, these revelations seem to confirm declassified FBI documents that also claimed sources had indicated that Hitler was indeed living in Argentina.
While the official story sold to the global public is that Hitler died of suicide in the Fuhrerbunker, the actual truth may be vastly different from the popularized version of events.

The acting CIA station chief’s informants, CIMELODY, was contacted by a former SS trooper Phillip Citroen, who claimed to have been in contact with Hitler—who was living under the pseudonym Adolph Schuttlemayer—about once a month in Colombia, while there on a trip from Maracaibo as an employee of the Royal Dutch Shipping Company.

Advertisment

Citroen said that Hitler had left Colombia for Argentina around January 1955, and erroneously suggested that the statute of limitations for war crimes had passed—as it had been 10 years since the end of World War II—and that the Allies could no longer prosecute Hitler as a war criminal.

The CIA documents reveal that Citroen told CIMELODY that he had even taken a photo with Hitler, and provided a grainy picture that was included in the CIA memo—with Hitler purported to be the man on the right.

READ MORE:  Declassified "Skull and Bones" Records from George W. Bush White House Set for Public Release

After reviewing the CIA’s files, the WHD chief reported that Citroen had only the year before reported that a colony of Nazis was present in Colombia that engaged in “idolatry of the Nazi past addressing him as ‘der Fuhrer’ and affording him the Nazi salute and storm trooper adulation,” in reference to Hitler himself.

The station chief wrote the WHP chief again only days later to engage in further investigation of whether or not it really was Adolf Hitler.

The HPD chief then incredibly made the decision to drop further inquiry, as he felt “enormous efforts could be expended on this matter with remote possibilities of establishing anything concrete.”

A seemingly strange response considering the magnitude of the report and veracity of the sources credibility in that Citroen was a former Nazi himself.

As The Free Thought Project previously reported:

“South America did indeed play host to many fleeing Nazis—including sadistic doctor Josef Mengele, whose torturous experimentation of Nazi concentration camp prisoners eventually branched into the study of twins. Later, in a small town in Brazil, one in five pregnancies resulted in births of twins—something Argentine historian Jorge Camarasa claimed in 2009 evidenced Mengele’s handiwork following his escape from Germany.”

Perhaps there is more to the story than a war weary public was led to believe in the wake of the devastation of WWII, and the truth lies somewhere other than what has became the official narrative of Hitler’s death in the Fuhrerbunker with his bride—with reality being much closer to an escape with may other Nazi war criminals to South America.

Secret Docs Reveal Allies Knew About Holocaust, Allowed it to Happen — For Years

Newly disclosed documents prove Allied forces in World War II were fully cognizant of the mass murders and torturous human rights violations in the Holocaust — and the full scope of those atrocities — committed by Adolf Hitler’s fascist Nazis, nearly three years before joining the fight.

“The major powers commented [on the mass murder of Jews] two-and-a-half years before it is generally assumed,” Dan Plesch, author of the newly published, Human Rights After Hitler, and Director of the Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy at SOAS, University of London, told The Independent.

For two-and-a-half years, Plesch learned, the Allies appeared to have allowed heinous crimes against humanity — the killing of millions of innocent Jewish and marginalized peoples — to be carried out at various concentration camps in nations under Nazi occupation. The Independent reports:

“Newly accessed material from the United Nations – not seen for around 70 years – shows that as early as December 1942, the US, UK and Soviet governments were aware that at least two million Jews had been murdered and a further five million were at risk of being killed, and were preparing charges. Despite this, the Allied Powers did very little to try and rescue or provide sanctuary to those in mortal danger.”

Of course, pointing this out does not mean one condones war, however, it should be known that potentially millions of lives could’ve been spared had Allied Powers simply let in refugees.

“Indeed,” the report continues, “in March 1943, Viscount Cranborne, a minister in the war cabinet of Winston Churchill, said the Jews should not be considered a special case and that the British Empire was already too full of refugees to offer a safe haven to any more.”

It wasn’t until public comment on the topic years later that the Allied forces hinted at the scope of atrocities taking place behind the barbed-wire confines of Hitler’s death camps.

“It was assumed they learned [of the mass murders] when they discovered the concentration camps, but they made this public comment in December 1942,” Plesch continued.

“The German authorities,” announced UK Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden to British Parliament at the time, “not content with denying to persons of Jewish race in all the territories over which their barbarous rule extends, the most elementary human rights, are now carrying into effect Hitler’s oft-repeated intention to exterminate the Jewish people.”

In research, the professor discovered the Allies planned to hold Hitler and the Nazis accountable for killing millions of Jews using documents smuggled outside occupied lands by networks of resistance and rebel groups. Among the documents was an indictment of Hitler for ‘war crimes dating from 1944.’

In full awareness of the horrific deaths of so many innocents, Plesch noted, the Allies never spearheaded a categorical attempt to free prisoners and shut down the notorious concentration camps, despite the voluminous body of pictures, documents, and other evidence brought forth during war crimes trials, which the major powers would have previously seen first hand.

Further, Herbert Pell, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s envoy to the United Nations War Crimes Commission (UNWCC), had been met with sharp resistance from anti-Semites in the State Department — ostensively due to concerns the nation’s involvement would impact its economic relationship with Germany after the war.

“After Mr Pell went public with the scandal, the State Department agreed to the prosecution of the Nazi leadership at Nuremberg, something that gathered pace after the highly publicised liberation of the concentration camps in the summer of 1945,” reports the Independent.

Plesch explained, “Among the reason given by the US and British policy makers for curtailing prosecutions of Nazis was the understanding that at least some of them would be needed to rebuild Germany and confront Communism, which at the time was seen as a greater danger.”

For 70 years, the UNWCC document cache had been restricted from public and research perusal — until former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Powers made the archive available.

Precisely how much Allied forces knew of the death camps and horrific abuses perpetrated by the Nazi regime more than two years before publicly commenting, and five years prior to the summer 1945 liberation, cannot, however, be gleaned from the assortment of documents in the archive.

“Notwithstanding this, it remains unclear to what extent Allied and neutral leaders understood the full import of their information,” Plesch said. “The utter shock of senior Allied commanders who liberated camps at the end of the war may indicate that this understanding was not complete.”

VOICE: The Most Chilling Trump Policy Yet

(MINTPRESS) Donald Trump’s first month in office has already left countless human rights organizations and activists reeling. The ACLU and a small army of lawyers have been working around the clock, pro bono, to fight an executive order that has targeted visa holders, green card holders and DREAMers. One would hope that things couldn’t get any worse in such a short span of time.

And yet, they have.

We"re revolutionizing the news industry, but we need your help! Click here to get started.

During his first congressional address, Donald Trump spoke of “a new chapter of American greatness” and revealed a terrifying new project called VOICE, which stands for Victims Of Immigration Crime Engagement. VOICE will be an office dedicated to documenting and compiling reports about crimes committed by undocumented immigrants.

The impact of this type of governmental program will likely be increased hostility toward immigrants. We’ve already seen what happens in times when there is a rise in bigoted rhetoric aimed at minority communities — be they black, Muslim, Jewish or otherwise.

The proposed VOICE program should frighten people not only because of what it means for the future of immigrants in the United States, but also the images and ideas from the past that it evokes.In a move to isolate and vilify Jews, the German Nazi Party would run reports on supposed Jewish crime statistics in order to stoke anti-Semitism.

An article from 1935 from the Nazi paper ‘Neues Volk’ entitled, “The Criminal Jew.” This article shows photos of Jews alongside their alleged crimes.

The German public aided in their efforts by providing their own anecdotes that vilified Jews. These stories would then be published by Der Sturmer, a newspaper that regularly featured caustic anti-Semitic content.

We have already seen examples of the kind of bigotry and hatred that the Trump administration has fostered. On Feb. 22, a man in Kansas shot two Indian-American men at a bar in Kansas, reportedly demanding that they “get out of [his] country.” One of the men was killed and the other man, as well as a bystander who chased the gunman as he escaped, were injured. The gunman reportedly thought he was shooting two Iranians, according to 911 calls placed by a worker at a restaurant where the gunman sought refuge after the attack.

Studies have shown that immigrants are actually less likely to commit crime than people born in the U.S. And yet, many immigrant communities are facing unprecedented hostility from both the public and the government. The VOICE program will only add to these woes, resulting in further stigmatisation or even violence.

VOICE may not be our generation’s Nuremberg Laws, but we can’t afford to deny that it could someday get to that stage.

By Roqayah Chamseddine  / Republished with permission / MintPress News / Report a typo