Showing posts with label Steve Scalise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steve Scalise. Show all posts

Saturday, July 1, 2017

String Of Deceptions Revealed- Scalise Shooting “Hoax” Claims Dismantled (VIDEO)

String Of Deceptions Revealed- Scalise Shooting


This here is a special report exposing coordinated mass deception targeted at truth seekers, independent thinkers and alternative media. In this report I expose a series of recent stories and claims which I believe are related and strategically coordinated to confuse, derail, mislead and deceive truth seekers and point them away from the intended targets.


This past week I counted at least 3 major misleading and deceptive narratives which all appeared to spread on exactly June 21st (2017) and I believe this is no coincidence. It’s a matter of connecting the dots and in this video report I help viewers do just that.


First and foremost I debunk a claim made in a series of videos that the recent shooting of House Majority Leader Steve Scalise was a fake event. Watch the video below and see how I tackle each and every claim and debunk the video using the same tools (Google Map) used in the original video to make the “hoax” claims.



Secondly, we’re all familiar with the Liberal Left’s planned and elite funded “resistance” against Trump and many of us realize this is all part of the globalist deep state new world order agenda. What many people don’t quite realize is that there is a parallel movement targeted at the independent-alternative media and truth seeking independent thinkers. This movement seeks to blame “Israel” or the “Jews” for practically everything that is wrong in the world from 9/11 all the way to the current DNC and Democratic party crimes exposed by Wikileaks. This includes the murder of Seth Rich, pedophilia in Washington D.C., corruption and collusion and much more. There is an active movement to shift the blame of all of these crimes off of concrete individuals like Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and the rest of the deep state criminals and put them all on the generic targets such as “Israel”, Israeli Mossad or “the Jews”.


At its root this is not very different from the “Russia did it” frenzy we’ve been seeing all year. Both involve blaming a generic enemy and pointing the finger away from the real issues (pedophilia and corruption) and the real criminals (Obama, Hillary, Podesta etc).


Finally, I expose the Rebekah Roth mystery and play a video which demonstrates that her identity, her background and claims are entirely unverified and unsubstantiated and yet that doesn’t seem to bother her “followers” who are believing everything she claims. Additionally, she appears to be an agent of deliberate disinformation pushing the very agenda I’m exposing in this video. I challenge viewers to step back, look at all the truly verified evidence and claims and decide for themselves.


This information is very important and it is my intention to help others connect the dots so that they too can see the nefarious globalist agenda unfolding in real-time right before us.


Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Self-Serving Politicians’ Priorities after Scalise Shooting Deserve Strong Gun Owner Response

How is voting in special benefits for themselves first, while the rest of us are left in legislative limbo, consistent with securing “the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”?



“U.S. Rep. Brian Babin (TX-36) today filed legislation to grant properly trained and certified Members of Congress the ability to conceal carry a personal firearm wherever their duties take them,” a press release from the congressman’s office declared Tuesday:


This bill would:



  • Allow all Members of Congress to have the ability to attempt to qualify for a concealed carry permit – either through their home state or a training program created by the United States Capitol Police (USCP).

  • Give the USCP the discretion in determining the training, licensing and parameters of use.

  • Direct the USCP to grant Members of Congress the ability to concealed carry in nearly every conceivable scenario – including federal parks and buildings, the national mall, to and from their offices, at schools and military bases – with only a few limited restrictions. These would include National Special Security Events, other areas under the direct jurisdiction of the Secret Service and commercial airliners.

  • Permit the training and certification to be paid for out of the Member’s Representational Allowance (MRA).

  • Supersede any other federal or state law regarding concealed carry.


“My bill would ensure rank and file Members of Congress have the opportunity to defend themselves by providing them the ability to concealed carry in nearly every scenario with only a few restrictions,” Babin elaborated. “With the increase in security threats to Members of Congress and our staffs, this is an important and necessary step that we must take.”


As if Congressional disregard for the limitations required by the Constitution and supposedly unalienable rights of the citizenry haven’t increased security threats for all.  While politicians no doubt face job-related risks, there is no credible justification for presuming their perils are any greater than – or even equal to – those faced by pizza delivery drivers, fast food workers or gas station mini-mart attendants, let alone the dangers presented to ordinary people living their daily lives.


Babin’s offensive and un-American equal protection-eviscerating scheme puts similar Congressional Carry proposals offered since the baseball practice shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise on steroids, as recent news reports show.


“Rep. Mo Brooks on Sunday said he will introduce legislation in the coming week to allow congressmen and senators to carry guns, in the wake of the shooting of fellow Congressman Steve Scalise,” Fox Business reported Sunday. “’Right now when we’re in Washington, D.C., once we’re off the complex … we’re still high-profile targets, but we have absolutely no way to defend ourselves because of Washington, D.C.’s rather restrictive gun laws,’ Brooks, R-Ala., told Maria Bartiromo on ‘Sunday Morning Futures.’”


That echoes sentiments expressed a few days earlier by Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-GA, who “said Congress should explore allowing lawmakers to carry weapons to defend themselves.”


By all means – as citizens and as human beings, they have every natural right the rest of us do. And there’s the rub. Because it’s hardly consistent with equal protection under the law to have the state bestow privileges (which, if you look at what they’re advocating is what these guys are talking about) on one preferred and elite group while “We the People” are excluded.  Presumably, special exemptions wouldn’t be made for members of Congress with criminal records, of which there are many.


It would also mean those promulgating tyranny, the most rabid citizen disarmament proponents in Congress, would have an option to arm themselves that they have spent careers denying to we “commoners.” That doesn’t just stand the Second Amendment on its head, it reverses it completely.


In the meantime, a priority that doesn’t directly benefit the “servants of the people” suddenly finds itself on the back burner:


“Cancelled Until Further Notice: Legislative Hearing on Discussion Draft of “Sportsmen Heritage and Recreational Enhancement Act” or “SHARE Act,” a June 14 announcement from the House Committee on Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Federal Lands  declares.


What’s that have to do with anything?


That’s the larger package into which the Hearing Protection Act proposal to remove suppressors from National Firearms Act registration and taxation has been placed.


So what legitimate reason does the committee have to not immediately reschedule and get things back on track? Of course the gungrabbers who don’t want it brought up are going to scream and raise hell. So what? They’ll do that regardless, whenever it’s brought up.


Congress has time to vote themselves special concealed carry privileges while ignoring its duty to eradicate infringements?


Of marginal improvement over what Brooks and Loudermilk were talking about is a bill introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie, R-KY, that would presume to “allow” non-residents visiting DC to carry firearms, provided they had a permit in their home state. That at least wouldn’t be for Congress members only, but it would distract from the parallel effort of nationwide reciprocity via H.R. 38, the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017.


That the bill is currently assigned a 2% prognosis for passage suggests this may once again be placating noisemaking and much ado about nothing: similar efforts have been attempted many times over the years.


That said, such legislative sausage-making is not completely without effect: It reaffirms the acceptance of government-issued “permits” to exercise rights and the undelegated power of government to bestow such approvals in the first place. The point is, if this Congress can pass a bill to “give” rights (and those quotation marks are intentional), a subsequent legislature can pass one to take them away.  As the Supreme Court noted in Heller, reaffirming the opinion in Cruikshank:



“[t]his is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The Second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed … .”



Defending that is a fundamental commitment Babin, Brooks and Loudermilk voluntarily swore an oath to honor when they accepted their positions of political power.


I appeared this afternoon on Armed American Radio Daily Defense with host Mark Walters to discuss this issue. You can download the program here.


—–


If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please consider making a donation to support our work.  You can donate HERE.

Monday, June 19, 2017

The Mainstream Media Is Still At War With Bernie Sanders: Here’s Why

(COMMONDREAMS) — It’s routine for right-wing outlets like Fox to smear progressive activists under the guise of “news” coverage. But why the New York Times? And why the special venom for Bernie Sanders?


After the horrific June 14 shooting of Congressman Steve Scalise and three other participants in a Republican baseball practice, the media floodgates opened for slimy innuendos. Before the day was done, a major supplier of the political sewage was the New York Times, which prominently published a left-blaming article that masqueraded as news reporting.


The media watch group FAIR pointed out that the Times piece “started with a false premise and patched together a dodgy piece of innuendo and guilt-by-association in order to place the blame for a shooting in Virginia on ‘the most ardent supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders.’”


It would be a mistake to think that the Times story was only the result of bias inflamed by the grisly shooting spree. A few days earlier, the newspaper had front-paged another “news” story hostile to grassroots political forces aligned with Bernie—a de facto editorial masquerading as news coverage, headlined: “Democrats in Split-Screen: The Base Wants It All. The Party Wants to Win.”


In a bizarre disconnect from electoral reality, the article portrayed a party establishment that had lost election after election, including a cataclysmic loss to Trump, as being about winning. And the article portrayed the party’s activist base as interfering with the establishment’s winning ways.


Such Times stories are now operating under a heightened sense of journalistic impunity since the newspaper abolished its 14-year-old ombudsperson position of “public editor” more than two weeks ago—further insulating its reporters and editors from accountability. More than ever, calling the shots at the Times—the most influential news outlet in the United States—means never having to say you’re sorry, or even justify what you’ve done.


Corporate-owned media hostility toward Sanders and the progressive base has been conspicuous and well-documented. That hostility started early in his campaign and never let up, sometimes manifested as giving him scant coverage. When the momentum of the Bernie campaign gained powerful traction as a threat to the corporate order, big media efforts to trash him went over the top.


At a key political moment last year, as FAIR analyst Adam Johnson wrote, “the Washington Post ran 16 negative stories on Bernie Sanders in 16 hours, between roughly 10:20 PM EST Sunday, March 6, to 3:54 PM EST Monday, March 7 — a window that includes the crucial Democratic debate in Flint, Michigan, and the next morning’s spin.” The day after this onslaught, Sanders stunned the elite pundit class by winning the Michigan primary.


Now, in mid-2017, with no presidential election in sight, why is the corporate media hostility toward Sanders so prone to surface?


Consider, as an example, this structural reality: Jeff Bezos, the owner of the Washington Post, has just unveiled plans for his company Amazon to buy Whole Foods. And Bernie Sanders, the most popular politician in the United States according to polls, is strongly opposed to allowing such huge consolidations of corporate power.


For good reasons, media powerhouses like the New York Times and Washington Post are averse to Donald Trump. At the same time, they remain quite cozy with Hillary Clinton’s political orientation and especially with the sectors of the corporate-military establishment that she represents. Like so much of the mass media, those outlets see Sanders as dangerously anti-corporate and way too willing to challenge Wall Street, big insurance companies, the fossil fuel industry and the like.


On a political level, the Clinton wing of the party has been running on the equivalent of dumpster-fire fumes since the disastrous loss in November. The party’s establishment, entwined with Wall Street and an agenda of continuous military intervention overseas, was just barely able to shoehorn its handpicked choice, Tom Perez, into becoming the new chair of the Democratic National Committee.


In a classic joint interview with MSNBC two months ago, Perez and Sanders showcased just how different their politics are. Perez mumbled platitudes, Sanders was forthright. Perez spoke about victims of an unfair economy, but he refused to denounce or even name their corporate victimizers—while Sanders was glad to do so.


The U.S. media establishment often conflates “populism” of the right and the left, as though Trump and Sanders are somehow symmetrical as anti-establishment figures. And, as in the case of the New York Times article that appeared hours after the GOP baseball tragedy, the Times has sometimes jumped at the chance to draw far-fetched parallels between Trump’s violence-tinged, pseudo-populist messaging from the right and Bernie’s humane, inclusive messaging from the left.


Like it or not, the battle over the future of the Democratic Party—including what kind of presidential nominee the party should have in 2020—is already underway. Overall, the top echelons of corporate media are oriented toward promoting the Clinton wing while denigrating the Bernie wing. The forces that brought us the disastrous 2016 Clinton campaign are not about to give up.


by Norman Solomon / Creative Commons / Common Dreams / Report a typo

Friday, June 16, 2017

Did The USA Finally Lose Its Collective Mind?

Authored by Howard Kunstler via Kunstler.com,


Historians of the future, huddled around their goose-fat lamps in muddy woolen cloaks, may cite this as the month that the Kardashian Dreamland formerly known as “The USA” finally lost its collective mind.


Submitted for your approval, as the late, great Rod Serling (senator from The Twilight Zone) used to say: this week’s Russia-Russia-Russia hearing on Capital Hill. I caught the final hour of this circus when freshman senator Kamala Harris (D – Cal) was hectoring Attorney General Jeff Sessions about his “contact with Russian Officials” and had to be reprimanded by the chair for her rude behavior.


Note: it’s now deemed illicit for US government officials to talk to Russian diplomats. I wonder what would happen if government officials in other lands decided that it was improper to talk with US diplomats. The Democratic Party seems to be building a case that the world would be better off without diplomats cluttering up each other’s capital cities. Hey hey, ho ho, Di-plo-macy has got to go! Now that’s a most progressive idea! Apparently, AG Sessions riled Senator Harris by pointing out that the Soviet Union collapsed nearly thirty years ago — a typical white privilege thing to say, right?


Next up was Senator Mark Warner (D – Va), Vice-Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who grilled Sessions about Russia’s electronic warfare capability. Say what?





First of all, wouldn’t Senator Warner find more enlightenment on the subject by calling the Secretary of Defense, or the top military brass, or the NSA Director to the witness table? Does he know where the duties of the US Attorney General begin and end?



Secondly, Is there anybody in this country with an IQ above room temperature who thinks that the USA is not similarly disposed to carry out electronic warfare? Or that all the advanced nations of the world are not toying with internet intrusions into each other’s cyber space? Perhaps this is a manifestation of the political neurosis called American Exceptionalism, the idea that we’re so unlike people in other lands that they might as well be space aliens. (A sweet idea for a new Twilight Zone episode.)



All this idiocy suggests that the Russia meme is losing its mojo and the forces dedicate to dump Trump might have to look elsewhere for some legal ground to stand on. For the moment, they’re veering into the darkling woods where obstruction of justice lives, a Blair Witch Project of politics, where any old assemblage of broken twigs is a sure sign of the lurking beast —  but perhaps that’s exactly where witch-hunting takes you.


Personally, I still believe they’ll run him over with the 25th Amendment, which allows for simple removal of a batshit incompetent executive without the pain-in-the-ass rigmarole of due process. You just get a consensus of the highest officials in the land to agree that guy has to go, and they get him gone, and, in this case, you get yourself Mike Pence, a tranny-like Church-Lady with a hard-on for the Koch Brothers. That’ll get the country great fast, I’m sure.


Then, of course, there was the gunning down of House Majority Whip Steve Scalise and others on a Virginia ballfield by a disgruntled Bernie Sanders fan, of all things. Is it hyperbole to say that this incident had the tone of a first shot in a new civil war? Even the hysterical elements over at CNN rushed to put out the very brushfires they had been kindling by broadcasting the Thursday night news against the backdrop of the annual congressional charity baseball gamed held at the Washington Nationals ballpark — as if the sore-beset people of this dissolute land might be stirred from their anomie by the comforting sound of wood on horsehide. Summer’s not quite officially here yet, but who feels like dancing in the streets? It’s more like wanting to hide behind the nearest trash can.

Thursday, June 15, 2017

Did American Revolution 2.0 Officially Begin With the Shooting Of House Majority Leader Scalise? (VIDEO)

Did American Revolution 2.0 Officially Begin With the Shooting Of House Majority Leader Scalise? (VIDEO) | scalis-shooting | Multimedia Sleuth Journal Special Interests US News


With the recent political shooting of House Majority Leader Steve Scalise in Alexandria, Virginia today we have to wonder if this shooting is more symbolic than anything else of the direction the country is headed. With every passing day now, the disturbing reality that all Americans will have to face is that we are in the middle of a revolution against America, the rule of law, freedom, the American way, conservative values and the individuals who hold these values. On the other side of the fence are the members of the deep state, the Democrats, the Neocons, the Progressives, the Liberal Left, some elements of the anti-Trump Republican Right and more importantly the pro-globalists that want to get this new world order done once and for all.


Let’s face it. Things have not been going very well lately for the globalist, the Liberal Left and their media cabal that has been trying to control the narrative ever since the release of the series of Wikileaks revelations which badly incriminated Hillary Clinton, John Podesta her campaign manager, former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Shultz and the entire Democratic party not to mention the Leftist media themselves exposed for colluding with the Clinton campaign to get her elected.



I’ve been covering the road to Civil War 2.0 lately because I sense we are getting closer and closer as frustrations rise in the Democratic camp, as lies are exposed one after another and their globalist agenda continues to fail.


Looking at history we know what villains do in the moment of desperation and sure enough that is what we are now observing. I invite readers to take this recent political shooting of Scalise very serious and I believe this is a symbolic first shot fired in what is now the official start of the second American Revolution. A revolution designed to tear America apart and turn it into chaos and unrest never before seen.


Solutions


Is is important to realize that this is all part of the “violent revolution” planned by the globalists long ago and probably the most important thing to realize is that the globalists want this revolution against America and they’ll do whatever it takes to get it especially as they see that their lies, mass mind control and propaganda are no longer working. Thus now more than ever it is important for those who believe in America and freedom to remain calm, continue sharing real news with everyone and exposing the mainstream media fake news. And while we’re at it let’s hope the rule of law and justice will ultimately prevail.


Michael Savage predicted ‘violence’ by ‘marginals’ day before attack



Michael Savage predicted ‘violence’ by ‘marginals’ day before attack



(Includes video/audio of the attack in Alexandria, VA, on June 14.)


By Michael Savage – June 14, 207




‘We are at a boiling point. There’s going to be a civil war’


Less than 24 hours before a supporter of former Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders fired at Republican members of Congress at a baseball practice, seriously injuring House Majority Whip Steve Scalise and four others before U.S. Capitol Police took down the assailant, talk-radio host and author Michael Savage warned of violence by “marginal” people who are set to explode and “kill somebody.”


Savage, the host of the nationally syndicated “The Savage Nation,” was commenting on recent developments that have escalated the anti-Trump “resistance,” such as comedian Kathy Griffin’s ISIS-style photo shoot of the decapitated likeness of Trump and the “Julius Caesar” play in Central Park featuring the assassination of a Trump-like figure.


“I don’t know how much more of this the country can take,” Savage said.


“We are at a boiling point. There’s going to be a civil war,” he told his listeners Tuesday.


The suspect in the shooting Wednesday, James T. Hodgkinson of Belleville, Illinois, campaigned for Sanders and belonged to a number of anti-Republican groups, including one called “Terminate the Republican Party.”


In comments prepared for his afternoon show Wednesday, Savage criticized President Trump’s reaction to the shooting, contending he lost an opportunity to “take control” of the narrative. And he pinned blame for the attack on Sanders, contending the Vermont senator “stoked hate against Republicans and the rich.”
The day before the attack, Savage told his listeners: “If they keep this up, I’m telling you there’s going to be an explosion in this country.”






He noted that nothing had been done to stop the Central Park play, “when it’s clearly illegal to assassinate a president, even in a mock way.”


“Do you understand that there are people out there who are marginal, who are going to go off like a rocket and kill somebody?” Savage asked.


“Do you understand what this left-wing is becoming in this country?”


Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh also predicted on his show yesterday that “at some point,” the extreme Trump resisters “are gonna crack, and they’re not gonna just start cutting heads off of dolls, and they’re not gonna just start using fake knives to stab people at Central Park.”


Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who was on the field practicing with his colleagues early Wednesday morning, commented that without the Capitol Police officers assigned to Scalise, “it would have been a massacre.”

Read more at WND

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Trump Delivers Statement On Steve Scalise Shooting

At 11:30am President Trump will deliver a statement following this morning’s shooting of House Majority Whip Steve Scalise and several others at a congressional baseball practice game ahead of an annual charity game tomorrow.


Earlier in the day, Trump said in a statement, "The Vice President and I are aware of the shooting incident in Virginia and are monitoring developments closely. We are deeply saddened by this tragedy. Our thoughts and prayers are with the members of Congress, their staffs, Capitol Police, first responders, and all others affected."


Trump also tweeted "Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, a true friend and patriot, was badly injured but will fully recover. Our thoughts and prayers are with him."


Trump has canceled his speech today at the Department of Labor and Vice
President Mike Pence has canceled a speech he had set for this morning.


 Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said this morning, "I know the entire Senate will join in echoing the sentiments of the president this morning. We’re deeply saddened. We’re all concerned for those injured. We’ll keep them in our prayers and send them our wish for a quick and full recovery." He added, "The Congressional baseball game is a bipartisan charity event. I know the Senate will embrace that today as we come together to express our concern and our gratitude."


Sen. Chuck Schumer added that he was with Paul, who had been at the practice earlier, in the Senate gym. Schumer said Paul repeated his gratitude that Scalise"s protective detail was present or that it would have been a "massacre."  "Their bravery is exemplary of all Capitol Police forces and we thank them," Schumer continued.


Gabrielle Giffords, the last member of Congress to be shot, surviving a shooting in 2011, tweeted this morning, "My heart is with my former colleagues, their families; staff, and the US Capitol Police- public servants and heroes today and every day."