Showing posts with label Kevin Brady. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kevin Brady. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Stocks Pop After Cornyn Suggests Tax Bill Deal "Possible" Today

Despite numerous headlines indicating a tax bill deal early next week, Republican Senator John Cornyn just told media that there "may be a tentative tax bill deal today." Algos liked the news and immediately bid stocks higher (despite no knowledge of what is in the "deal").


“It’s possible,” John Cornyn, the No. 2 Senate Republican, tells reporters of tax bill, according to Bloomberg.


 


The Senate has “ping-ponged” offers back and forth with House and is making good progress, he says.



And stocks popped on it...



 


Of course, its also "possible" that the deal is not done today... and that"s why we were intrigued to see "high tax" stocks underperforming...



The main areas of contention: AMTs and treatment of SALTs (Republicans were planning to tweak corporate rate from 20% to 21-22% to pay for some of the changes but this idea is facing fierce resistance from the business community – Washington Post).


Brady Says Compromise Likely Coming Friday (reported at 1035ET)


House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady, who’s overseeing the House-Senate conference committee for tax negotiations, said the panel will likely come to an agreement on final legislation by Friday.


“We are on track for this week,” Brady told reporters, referring to a so-called conference report.


Conference reports generally go point-by-point through areas of disagreement and say how each was resolved. For example, if the House position on a provision is the one they’ve agreed on, the report will say that with respect to that provision, the conferees propose that the Senate recede from its position and concur with the House’s position.


House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told GOP members the goal is for the House to vote on the tax bill next Tuesday, Dec. 19, according to Representative Lamar Smith of Texas.


Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma said he heard that the goal was Tuesday, but there wasn’t an announcement about it directly.


“The time frame of a vote next week is very realistic,” said Representative Tom Reed of New York. -- Erik Wasson









Thursday, December 7, 2017

Republicans Reverse, May Allow State Income Tax Deduction

One day after the top Senate Republicans realized they probably should have read the tax bill they voted for in the deep of the night on Saturday morning, and announced they are seeking to repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax they passed just days earlier, realizing it could punish growing companies, they now also appear to be reversing on the controversial repeal of State and Local Tax Deductions, and as Bloomberg reports, Republican lawmakers "are discussing a compromise on state and local tax deductions that would allow taxpayers to deduct state income tax, House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady said."


According to one proposal being discussed, taxpayers could deduct both their state income tax and state and local property taxes up to a combined limit of $10,000. This differs from the currently circulating bills which preserve the individual deduction for state and local property taxes - capped at $10,000 - but not for income taxes. The push to include income taxes could help those in high-tax states who don’t own property.


Mitch McConnell confirmed he’s open to tweaking final tax legislation to appease lawmakers who want to let constituents deduct state income taxes: "There’s some in the House who would like to see that applied not just to property, but to income tax, you know, where you can sort of pick which state and local tax you want to deduct,” the Kentucky Republican said on conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt’s show. “That sounds like a kind of reasonable idea.”


Summarizing the conference process, McConnell said "There are a lot of these things that are floating back and forth,” adding that he cannot predict “exactly how the final product turns out” once the House and Senate complete their conference negotiations.


Indicating that SALT repeal was conceived as an entirely political move meant to punish "rich", predominantly blue states, House Republican leaders - hearing significant pushback from their own constituents - signaled openness to "relieving the burden for residents of high-tax states."








Plans for the so-called SALT deduction have prompted more tension in the House than in the Senate, because there aren’t any Republican senators from states with the highest taxes. Twelve out of the 13 GOP House lawmakers who voted against the bill last month were from high-tax states. Still, including the property tax deduction in the Senate bill was a last-minute change to help get the support of Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine.


 


Two House members from New Jersey -- Leonard Lance, a Republican, and Josh Gottheimer, a Democrat -- plan to submit a joint proposal to the conference committee that would maintain SALT in its entirety.


 


The lawmakers said repealing the break will lead to "double taxation" and "pay for reform on the backs of just a few states that already pay significantly more than other states in federal taxes." One of those net donor states, they note, is New Jersey.



Brady, who’s overseeing the House-Senate conference committee for tax negotiations, said Wednesday that allowing income tax deductions is one of five options on the table. Others include potential adjustments to rates, brackets, the individual alternative minimum tax and the family tax credit.


There is just one problem with the bill which is already cutting it dangerously close to the $1.5Tn extra deficit limit: where does the money come from?


As Bloomberg writes, it"s unclear how lawmakers would pay for any such modifications to the state and local tax break. Preserving the property tax deduction up to $10,000 would cost about $148 billion over a decade, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. McConnell has been said to want any proposed changes presented with ways to pay for them.


Among the proposed revenue offset include changing estate tax rules about stepped-up basis and closing what they call a loophole for charitable donations to private foundations as ways to offset some of the lost revenue that would result from keeping SALT.









Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Another Delay: Senate Won"t Release Tax Bill On Thursday As Mnuchin Admits Corp Tax Cut Delay Likely

Yesterday, the dollar slumped and yields dropped after a WaPo report claimed that the corporate tax cut could - the core piece of GOP tax reform - would be delayed by up to a year, a clear indication that there may be irreconcilable differences in the Senate regarding tax reform. Then, moments ago, Axios confirmed as much, reporting that the Senate "won"t release its version of the GOP tax bill tomorrow", citing a senior GOP aide. On Tuesday Mitch McConnell said that the bill would come out on Thursday. That said, the aide reportedly said "this wasn"t a delay, because the release of the Senate bill was always going to start after the House Ways and Means Committee finished marking up its bill."


As Axios explains, the delaying introduction of the bill is problematic "because it not only gives off the impression that things aren"t going well (whether it"s true or not), but also removes one more day that could have been spent getting the caucus on board with the bill."


Meanwhile, speaking on Bloomberg, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin said that the White House"s preference would be to start the corporate tax rate cut next year, which again implies a material probability of delay.


“Our strong preference is that the corporate tax rate starts next year. The longer we wait, the worse it is for the economy,” Mnuchin said in interview on Bloomberg TV.


Asked whether he rules out delaying corporate tax cuts: “Again, I’d just say, the president’s strong preference -- he feels very strongly that he wants to start this right away. But having said that, we’ll have to look at the entire Senate package -- I assume it’s just a money issue -- as to how they’re moving the different pieces around”


“It’s not a philosophical issue; I’m sure they’d like to start this just as soon as they can”


Some other soundbites courtesy of Bloomberg:


  • MNUCHIN: STATE ELECTIONS DIDN"T CHANGE OUR TAX STRATEGY

  • MNUCHIN: WE"RE GOING THROUGH HEALTHY PROCESS ON TAXES ON CMTEES

  • MNUCHIN: PRESIDENT WOULD LIKE TO KILL HEALTH CARE MANDATE

  • MNUCHIN: KILLING HEALTH CARE MANDATE WOULD FREE UP LOT OF MONEY

  • MNUCHIN: HOUSE MOVE ON CARRIED INTEREST STEP IN RIGHT DIRECTION

  • MNUCHIN: WE"RE SENSITIVE TO NEED OF STATE TAX EXEMPTION

  • MNUCHIN: THERE ARE SHORT-TERM CONCERNS ABOUT FX IMPACT ON TRADE

  • MNUCHIN: PART OF DOLLAR STRENGTH REFLECTS U.S. ECONOMY

  • MNUCHIN: I DON"T THINK YELLEN HAS MADE DECISION ON STAYING

In the final update, CNBC reports that "the Senate tax plan is not expected to include a controversial 20 percent excise tax on imports by multinational companies, according to three people briefed on the issue."








The tax is a critical revenue raiser in the House bill—worth about $155 billion over a decade—and applies to purchases by U.S. subsidiaries of multinational businesses from their foreign counterparts. Among the most vocal opponents of the new fee is the conservative advocacy group Heritage Action, which called it a "backdoor border adjustment tax."


 


The fee covers both intangible goods such as intellectual property as well as consumer parts. But unlike the border adjustment tax—a proposal that Republicans have discarded—the transactions must occur within a single parent company. Business groups such as the Organization for International Investment also fear the tax could disrupt international supply chains and raise costs for multinational companies—and ultimately consumers.


 


"It"s an extraterritorial reach into global supply chains that were never part of the U.S. tax base," OFII President Nancy McLernon said. "It will have a disproportionate impact on international companies that have made a deliberate decision to invest and create jobs in the United States."



Last week, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady defended the tax as a crucial to ensuring that companies do not shift profits overseas. He said that the border adjustment tax was abandoned months ago and that the excise tax in the current bill bears no resemblance to that proposal.


With so many moving parts and even more conflicting opinions, it will be surprising if a one day delay by the Senate is all it boils down to.









Tax Bill Fiasco: Senate Considering 1 Year Corporate Tax Cut Delay; Dollar Slides

Suddenly Republican tax reform is looking deader than a doornail.


According to the Washington Post, which cites " four people familiar with a draft of the legislation " not only is there little to no compromise on the way forward, but the only thing Senate Republicans leaders can agree on is to punt the centerpiece of the GOP tax plan by at least a year, and are considering a one-year delay in the implementation of a major corporate tax cut. This change would lower the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent in 2019, not 2018 as currently constructed by a House GOP bill. And while the delay would save $100 billion in much needed funds, it would be met with resistance from Trump, who wants the tax cuts implemented immediately.


In any case, to ensure that companies don’t postpone major investment decisions and wait for the lower rate in 2019, Senate Republicans are considering allowing companies to immediately deduct capital investments in 2018 from their taxable income, the WaPo sources said.


The news comes amid the expected growing opposition in the Senate to the current bill. One day after Trump nemesis John McCain said tax reform is "dead on arrival", on Tuesday, Sen. Ted Cruz said that the House tax bill could end up raising taxes on some middle-class Americans, and he pushed for assurances that the Senate bill would lower everyone’s taxes. Meanwhile, senators Marco Rubio and Mike Lee are pushing for an expansion of the child tax credit beyond what was introduced in the House. They have called for raising the child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000. The House bill would raised the credit to $1,600.


Furthermore, the WaPo adds, that significant differences are also expected on the individual income-tax provisions.








Senate negotiators are planning to eliminate the state and local tax deductions that families take, going further than the House bill. They are also expected to retain roughly seven income tax brackets, rather than the four the House has proposed.


 


Details could change ahead of a formal release of a bill this Thursday by the Senate Finance Committee.



There will be a number of other changes to the taxes that certain businesses pay and the way companies are taxed on overseas earnings. Senate negotiators aren’t planning to include a temporary $300 “family flexibility credit” contained in the House bill. It’s this credit, which would expire after five years, that has fueled criticism that the House bill would eventually lead to higher taxes for some middle class families.


Separately, Bloomberg reports that on Tuesday afternoon President Trump called into a meeting between Senate Democrats, National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn and White House Legislative Affairs Director Marc Short, Democratic Sen. Jon Tester tells reporters. Tester said that Trump spoke (maybe screamed would be a better description) for about 15 minutes by phone from Asia and insisted the rich will be hurt by the tax bill.


During the same meeting, Dem. Senator Sherrod Brown gave Cohn copies of two bills he wants in the tax package, including one that would boost income of those making $20k-$70k. Brown added that Trump said over the phone he liked the ideas in the bills Brown presented; “I don’t know if McConnell is not hearing what the president is saying or if McConnell is not paying attention," Brown says.


Or maybe Trump just hasn"t heard yet that Senate Republicans, after failing to repeal Obamacare not too long, now plans to concede on the most important aspect of Trump"s proposed tax plan.


In any case, a decision on delaying the implementation of the corporate rate has not been made, the WaPol said. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas), in writing his legislation, was considering having the corporate tax rate cut phase out after eight years but made a change the night before the bill was introduced to effectively make it permanent.


With the news of the potential delay hitting the market, the dollar in general, and the USD/JPY in particular was the first casualty and the pair was sold by leveraged accounts in Tokyo.










Thursday, November 2, 2017

Futures Slide On Report Corporate Tax Cuts To Be Temporary, Phase Out After A Decade

When the NAR won the battle over keeping State and Local Tax deductions "as is", in the process denying the proposed GOP tax reform more than a trillion in revenue over the next ten years, it effectively doomed the most important provision of the republican tax bill set to be unveiled tomorrow: the reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35% to 20%. Or rather the permanent reduction in the corporate tax rate. Because according to House Ways and Means Chairman, Kevin Brady, what will be revealed on Thursday is a tax proposal with a temporary corporate cut, one which reverts back to the original 35% tax rate after a decade.



As Bloomberg confirms there have been conflicting reports about when the rate cut would take effect, or how long it would last, and according to a Republican lawmaker, House tax writers will phase out the proposed corporate rate of 20% after a decade. While cutting the corporate tax rate to 20% from 35% is a key provision of the Republican tax legislation that set to be unveiled tomorrow, no matter how hard they tried, GOP legislators could not get over a key hurdle: lack of revenue.


According to Bloomberg, "Congressional tax writers are struggling to find enough revenue to help the tax package adhere to the 2018 budget Congress adopted last month. That budget would allow the legislation to add no more than $1.5 trillion to the federal deficit -- before accounting for any economic growth that might result."


The problem is that the corporate tax cut is estimated to cost just over that, or $1.6 trillion over the next decade according to the Tax Foundation. One solution to the dilemma, is the notion of phasing in the corporate rate cut.  Furthermore, the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation said in an April letter to House Speaker Paul Ryan that a corporate tax rate of 20 percent would create deficits in the long run even if it remained in effect for just three years, adding further complication to the current revenue-less predicament.


Another problem: making the rate-cut temporary would limit its ability to spur economic growth, a key selling point cited by President Donald Trump and others. It is also a key factor in explaining the recent market surge, especially since Trump"s "Biggest tax cut ever" would have a 10 year shelf life, at which point things would revert back to the way they were.


And while stocks have been slow to grasp the significance of this major disruption to the GOP tax bill, the USDJPY is - gradually - waking up, or rather down, and so are futures...










Wednesday, November 1, 2017

The Delays Begin: Release Of Republican Tax Bill Postponed Until Thursday

In our comprehensive review of the GOP tax bill which was scheduled to be unveiled tomorrow, we noted the following key caveat  "There are a lot of unknowns in this process, the biggest of which - of course - is whether the bill will be delayed from its scheduled Wednesday appearance." In retrospect, and in light of the conflicting reports about what may be contained in the final draft of the bill, this has proved prophetic because moments ago, Axios reported that week"s 2nd biggest events - after Trump"s announcement of Jay Powell as the next Fed chair - the release of the Republican tax bill is being postponed by at least one day, from Wednesday to Thursday.








The delay of the scheduled release, by the House Ways and Means Committee, reveals the difficulties the team has had in resolving how to raise enough money to pay for the massive corporate tax cuts. Political hot button issues — like the treatment of 401k savings — are still in flux. The delay shouldn"t affect the timing for the mark-up, which is expected to happen Monday.



Separately, the Hill adds that the GOP now says the bill will be released on Thursday as lawmakers scramble to reach a consensus on how to restructure the nation’s tax laws.








Fights over possible changes to the tax status of 401(k) retirement plans and the state and local taxes deduction are at the center of the delay. Lobbyists chattered throughout the day over whether Wednesday’s big unveiling of the GOP tax package would have to be delayed as it became clear that lawmakers were differing over various reductions.


 


Hours before the decision was made to punt the release for a day, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) told reporters that he intended to release text of a bill Wednesday — but that it would not be a chairman’s mark. This would allow Brady to make changes to the text through the weekend ahead of a planned markup on Monday in the Ways and Means Committee.


 


President Trump had sought to quash any changes to 401(k) plans last week, but it has become clear that Republicans have not stopped talking about shifting the tax status of the plans as they seek to ensure their bill does not add to the deficit after its first 10 years. Republicans have discussed lowering the amount people can put into their retirement plans before taxes, which could increase the amount of revenue initially hit by taxes. 


 


Brady appears to be moving toward a compromise that would allow a deduction for local property taxes — a concession that could win at least some support from the blue-state Republicans. “I think we"re moving in the right direction,” Rep. Leonard Lance (R-N.J.) said on CNN Tuesday.


 


The bill"s unveiling would launch the GOP"s blitzkrieg effort to try to pass legislation by Thanksgiving and trigger a lobbying bonanza from both supporters and opponents. Any delay in the bill’s introduction is not helpful giving the time pressures, though the delay of one day would not affect the planned Monday markup.



Meanwhile, earlier on Tuesday Bloomberg reported that Republican tax writers were planning to keep the top individual income tax rate unchanged at 39.6%. 








The top rate may apply to taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes of about $1 million and higher, said the people who asked not to be named because the discussions are private. Currently, the 39.6 percent rate kicks in at $418,400 of taxable income for single filers and $470,700 for married couples filing jointly.


 


The White House and GOP leaders’ tax framework released last month called for reducing the current seven income brackets to three -- 12 percent, 25 percent and 35 percent, with the flexibility for the tax-writing committees to add a possible fourth bracket for top earners.



The delay itself is not surprising as the final bill is expected to somehow reconcile numerous other, often conflicting items among which:


  • Are middle-class cuts from the budget framework (like doubling the standard deduction and expanded child tax credits) included?

  • Is the SALT deduction included (or capped in some way)?

  • What level is the corporate tax rate (over/under Trump’s 20% target)

  • Is there a fourth tax bracket (rumblings suggest incomes above 1mm USD would be affected)

  • Is the tax cut retroactive to Jan. 1, 2017?

  • Is there a repatriation deal for money kept overseas?

  • Does it add to the deficit?  If so, how much?

  • Will extraneous issues be slipped into the draft to entice specific voters?
    • Minimum wage hike

    • Border wall funding

    • Debt ceiling compromise

    • Planned parenthood funding


And much more. In light of this, the biggest surprise would be if the GOP actually manages to have a just one day delay.


This means that for markets Thursday is now shaping up as an especially painful day, with announcements due on not only the next Fed chair, but also the layout of the tax bill. The good news is that no matter what the "news" actually is, the market will hit new all time highs.









Monday, October 30, 2017

The House Will Reveal Its Tax Bill On Wednesday: Here"s What"s At Stake

Having recently passed a budget as a result of communal efforts between the House and Senate which were notably absent during healthcare reform efforts earlier this year, the stage is set for Congress to enter a very intense multi-week period leading up to Thanksgiving, filled with headlines on tax reform. From a market standpoint, the outcome of this process will determine whether US interest rates continue to go up or retrace the recent increase. Meanwhile, from a purely political perspective, from here the two main questions surrounding tax reform are: what is the process to get from these budget resolutions to actual tax reform and what are the potential pitfalls that Congress needs to avoid in order to successfully pass the bill.


In terms of next steps, the progression from budget resolutions to tax reform is as follows:


  • Having recently passed a 2018 budget, an important step which unlocks "budget reconciliation", or the process by which tax reform can be passed with a simple majority vote, the next step is to write the actual bill; this will be done by the Ways and Means Committee in the House and the Senate Finance Committee in the Senate, likely in unison (much like with the budget resolutions) in an effort to speed up the process. 

  • After it passes the committee vote, it will be brought to the floor for a full vote in the House, which will then be sent to the Senate upon approval.  At this point, the Senate can vote for the bill as is and send to the president’s desk, vote to kill the bill, or they can add amendments to the bill and vote on their new version.  In the latter case where the Senate adds amendments, the new bill will be sent to a “conference committee” of both Senators and House Representatives, in which they would reconcile the bill and send it back to House/Senate for passage and then sent to the President’s desk. 

As noted earlier, the House is now expected to release a draft tax reform bill this Wednesday, November 1.  The content and structure of the bill are of supreme importance and there will be negotiations and amendments following the release of the initial draft.  That said, the initial draft should be very telling, giving insight into the aggressiveness of the cuts, funding measures and where the GOP sees room to compromise.  With a variety of ideas suggested throughout this process, understanding which make it into the actual bill is important; according to Citi, key things to look for include:


  • Are middle-class cuts from the budget framework (like doubling the standard deduction and expanded child tax credits) included?

  • Is the SALT deduction included (or capped in some way)?

  • What level is the corporate tax rate (over/under Trump’s 20% target)

  • Is there a fourth tax bracket (rumblings suggest incomes above 1mm USD would be affected)

  • Is the tax cut retroactive to Jan. 1, 2017?

  • Is there a repatriation deal for money kept overseas?

  • Does it add to the deficit?  If so, how much?

  • Will extraneous issues be slipped into the draft to entice specific voters?
    • Minimum wage hike

    • Border wall funding

    • Debt ceiling compromise

    • Planned parenthood funding


There are a lot of unknowns in this process and any number of discussed (or new) provisions may be added; over the weekend Bloomberg reported that bowing to concerns from Republican House members in high-tax states, the chamber’s chief tax writer said he’ll preserve a federal income-tax break for property taxes.


“At the urging of lawmakers, we are restoring an itemized property tax deduction to help taxpayers with local tax burdens,” House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady said in a statement Saturday afternoon.


In a sign of the complex balancing act that Brady must perform to produce a tax-overhaul bill this week, the property-tax announcement came on the same day that the National Association of Home Builders pulled its support for the legislation. The group’s chief cited concerns that the bill might undermine existing tax breaks that support the housing market. Likewise, a coalition that includes the National Association of Realtors said in an emailed statement that it “will vigorously oppose this plan.”


The removal of the so-called SALT provision means that Congressional leaders will need to find an alternative way of finding as much as $1.3 trillion over 10 years - revenue that would help offset the deep tax-rate cuts they want for businesses and individuals. Restoring the property-tax deduction would trim that revenue projection by about a third - or $430 billion - said a conservative tax lobbyist who asked not to be named because discussions about the bill were private.


And yet, adding to the confusion, it would appear that deductions for state and local income taxes and sales taxes would still be repealed under the planned House bill.


As Bloomberg reported moments ago, the confusion is so great that corporate tax cuts may have to be staggered reaching the 20% threshold over a matter of years:


  • PLAN WOULD CUT CORPORATE RATE GRADUALLY, REACHING 20% IN 2022

Regardless of the details of the final bill, the important question for the market is whether or not meaningful corporate and individual tax cuts will be enacted; Citi believes that the answer "is a resounding yes – and it will happen sooner rather than later."








Given the speed and determination with which the GOP passed the budget resolutions and the general agreement regarding the details and necessity of passing tax reform (both economically and politically), I have little doubt that Republicans will find a way to compromise.  I can comfortably predict tax reform becomes law before the end of 2017, with an eye towards the first week in December. 



Finally, there is the question whether today"s Manafort charges could derail tax reform.  Addressing that issue, Paul Ryan said in a radio interview that “nothing’s going to derail what we’re working on in Congress" adding that he feels good about Senate votes for tax bill as the outline of the plan has already been discussed with senators.









Stocks, Bond Yields Tumble On Disappointing "Gradual" Tax Cut Headlines

Having continued Friday"s melt-up as soon as US equity markets opened this morning, headlines from Washington that the corporate tax cuts may be enacted "gradually" reaching 20% in 2022.


As Bloomberg reports, House tax writers are discussing a gradual phase-in for the corporate tax-rate cut that President Donald Trump and Republican leaders want -- a schedule that would have the rate reach 20 percent in 2022, according to a member of the chamber’s tax-writing committee and a person familiar with the discussions.


The phase-in plan has been considered, but may not yet be final, said a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, who asked not to be named because the discussions are private.


Under that plan, the rate may be reduced from its current 35 percent rate by three percentage points a year starting in 2018.


This is clearly not what the "Veruca Salt" market demands... "I want it all.. and I want it now."



This follows the SALT elimination over the weekend. As Bloomberg reports, bowing to concerns from Republican House members in high-tax states, the chamber’s chief tax writer said he’ll preserve a federal income-tax break for property taxes.


“At the urging of lawmakers, we are restoring an itemized property tax deduction to help taxpayers with local tax burdens,” House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady said in a statement Saturday afternoon.



The announcement was welcomed by Representative Chris Collins, a New York Republican, who said the compromise would address the need “to protect middle income working families” in states like his own. He predicted it would assuage Republicans’ concerns.


And that sent stocks lower...



 


Even FANG Stocks are rolling over...



 


And 10Y Yields are at one week lows...










Friday, October 27, 2017

An Army Of Lobbyists Is Coming To Kill Tax Reform

Having sworn themselves to secrecy, Republicans on the House Ways and Means committee are scrambling to put together a tax bill by next week. But not knowing anything about the details of the plan, as it stands right now, hasn’t stopped an army of lobbyists from mobbing Capitol Hill with one overweening mission: To threaten, cajole or otherwise coax lawmakers into preserving loopholes that benefit their clients.


Here"s Bloomberg:


The stage was set with the House’s adoption Thursday of a budget resolution designed to speed the course of tax legislation and kick off a three-week sprint toward a House bill. Now, lobbyists representing every corner of the economy are poised to first devour, then attack what may be hundreds of pages of legislation that Brady says he’ll release Nov. 1.


 


Special interests from realtors to dairy farmers will be trying to save their industry-specific tax breaks, said Tim Phillips, president of Americans for Prosperity. His group, which is backed by billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch, supports ending such breaks.


 


“It’s pretty fierce,” Phillips said. “We met with Brady on Tuesday and he was saying their offices are swamped with all the special interest groups swarming in asking to be protected.”



The immense pressure to find a source of revenue to compensate for the sweeping cuts to corporate and individual rates has already nearly derailed the tax reform process. Yesterday, House Republicans narrowly approved the Senate version of a $4 trillion federal budget over the objections of 20 blue-state Republicans who oppose the elimination of the state and local tax deduction, which they say would disproportionately raise taxes on middle-class taxpayers in blue states, which tend to have higher taxes. Yet, Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady has said the elimination of the SALT deduction will stay in the bill - for now, at least.



Kevin Brady


On a static basis, the nine-page outline introduced by the White House and GOP Congressional leaders last month will cost $2.4 trillion over the first decade and $3.2 trillion over the second decade, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. The TPC also found that 80% of the benefits from tax reform would accrue to the top 1% of earners. Republicans who are writing the bill must somehow reduce the impact on the deficit to $1.5 trillion, while adhering to President Donald Trump’s promise that middle-class Americans would be the biggest beneficiaries of the tax overhaul.


Still, it remains to be seen which groups will lose their benefits. According to Bloomberg, even Republican members of Ways and Means don’t know what will be preserved and what will be eliminated.


That could make releasing the bill by the Wednesday deadline difficult.


“The problem is that Ways and Means has somewhat been kept out of the loop with details,” Representative Jim Renacci of Ohio, a member of the House tax-writing panel, said in an interview. “There are still a lot of hurdles to get it done.”


As Bloomberg points out, the elimination of the SALT deduction has become one of the most divisive issues surrounding tax reform. Trump and congressional leaders have proposed abolishing that break, which benefits high-tax states that tend to vote Democratic. But several Republican House members from such states want to preserve the break in some form.


“Can you get people to put their party loyalty above home-grown constituents’ concerns?” said Hollier, a former chief of staff and legislative director for Senator Mike Crapo, an Idaho Republican. “How they deal with that will show that people can be broken.”


And unsurprisingly, corporate lobbyists, who are used to their clients’ interests being given priority in Congress, are upset with the Republicans’ decision to keep other details of the bill under wraps.



Will Hollier, whose clients include Microsoft Corp. and Visa Inc., told Bloomberg that secrecy is a double-edged sword: The secrecy has allowed for some efficiency, but it’s also prevented GOP leaders from winning broad support.


Which could create problems for the bill as it moves forward because, as Sen. Bob Corker told Bloomberg: “I don’t think that people realize that 80 percent plus of this effort is eliminating things in the code,” referring to special interest loopholes. Meaning that, once the bill’s details are made public, Republicans will need to guide it to the president’s desk over lobbyists’ objections.  


“I mean, over the next two weeks, especially when the Senate tax-writing committee puts their stuff out, they’re going to realize that this the biggest tax code rewrite since 1986 and it’s going to affect everyone,” Corker said.


Lobbyists have already started pushing back against details in the nine-page outline that would raise taxes on corporate America. Those measures include the elimination of corporate deductions for interest payments – which could raise as much as $1 trillion over a decade – as well as a new foreign minimum tax that would affect corporations who shift profits to offshore tax havens


One of the ways to make up the revenue gap is by limiting the deductions corporations take on the interest they pay on their loans -- a major consideration for industries such as private equity and real estate. A prior House Republican proposal called for completely eliminating the corporate break, which could have raised more than $1 trillion over a decade.


 


“They’re totally undecided,” about how to restrict corporate interest deductions, said Marc Gerson, the chair of law firm Miller & Chevalier. Gerson said proposals include setting limits based on a company’s earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, or Ebitda, a key measure of profitability. Existing debt might be grandfathered in, he said.


 


Another piece of the framework is aimed at preventing U.S. companies from shifting their earnings to offshore tax havens -- by imposing a minimum foreign tax. The idea -- described briefly and obliquely in the framework language -- was called “appalling” several weeks ago by Ken Kies, a lobbyist whose clients include Microsoft and General Electric Co. The rate and formula for such a tax haven’t been specified, but the proposal carries multibillion-dollar implications for multinationals.


 


On the individual side, the treatment of state and local deductions remains in question. At least 12 Republicans from high-tax states, whose constituents stand to lose if the tax break is repealed, voted no on the House budget Thursday. The most vocal among them have demanded a compromise on the issue.



Given the number of parties involved, there are many obstacles to passing tax reform by the Republicans’ hoped-for deadline of year’s end, including the other issues on the Congressional agenda. Congress must fund the government to avoid a shutdown by Dec. 8. That could turn ugly as the White House has signaled it’ll demand funding for a border wall, and Democrats say they want a solution to protect young undocumented immigrants.


To be sure, there is one powerful political imperative that might force Republicans to swallow their objections: The fear that another legislative failure - especially one with the potential to tank financial markets - could cost Republicans one, or both, of their Congressional majorities.


House and Senate leaders hope to pass bills through their chambers by Thanksgiving, said Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn. The different bills would then have to be reconciled with another round of votes in December. Only then can Congress send the final bill to the president’s desk.
 









Friday, August 4, 2017

Best Day For The Dollar Since January: Here's Why

The Bloomberg dollar index has surged, rising as much as 0.8% higher against all G-10 peers, its biggest advance since Jan. 26, and is on track for its first weekly gain since early July.



The move has been largely attributed to the "stronger-than-expected employment and wage gains", although as several banks commented shortly after the payrolls report came out, "everything is in place for a classic short-squeeze."


However, the real reason why the dollar is spiking today is following comments from Gary Cohn who said that he’s “confident” tax reform can be accomplished by year-end and together with House Ways and Means Committee Head Brady, underscored that another Homeland Investment Act, or HIA2, plan to repatriate offshore dollars is coming:


  • *BRADY: GOVT SET TO DELIVER `PRO-GROWTH" TAX REFORM THIS YEAR

  • *BRADY: GOVT POISED TO ACT ON TAX REFORM FOR 1ST TIME IN 31 YRS

  • *CHIEF GOP TAX WRITER: JOBS REPORT SHOWS TOO MANY STILL HURTING

  • *REP. KEVIN BRADY: JOBS REPORT SHOWS `STEADY PROGRESS"

  • *COHN: ECONOMIC GROWTH WILL HELP PAY FOR TAX REDUCTIONS

  • *COHN: WE"RE WORKING FOR MAJOR TAX REDUCTIONS

  • *COHN: WE ARE COMMITTED TO AS LOW A RATE AS POSSIBLE FOR COS.

As a reminder, the original Homeland Investment Act of 2004 provided for a one-time tax holiday in 2006 on the repatriation of foreign earnings by US corporations. Back then, companies repatriated €300b in 2005, 5x more than in preceding years. As a result, the DXY was up 12.2% in 2005. While the dollar was generally favored by interest rate differentials, and also some of the repatriation would have been dollars held in offshore accounts that would not have required an FX component to them, the HIA provided a significant USD bid.


As several banks, most notably Citi notes, Democrats are under pressure to support HIA while tech companies, which are major donors to the party, are one of the major beneficiaries of repatriation.  There are anecdotal reports in DC of intensive lobbying of Democratic lawmakers taking place by these firms, which would suggest that even if the Fed disappointed in the next few months, HIA 2 alone could provide a much needed tailwind to the USD.


And, in an amusing tangent, so far the White House response to today"s data has been "very disciplined and professional" with Trump also sounding more polished in his WV rally last night. This has prompted various analysts to concludes that Generally Kelly is getting a grip, which is also dollar bullish.


That said, not everyone is convinced, and CIBC’s Bipan Rai saying that “today’s number is just a short-term vehicle to express intraday dollar trading rather than a shift in strategic view.” Though, he adds, the USD is due for a “corrective snap back."

Saturday, March 25, 2017

"ObamaCare Will Explode" Trump Tweets As WSJ Lashes Out At "ObamaCare Republicans"

Doubling down on his "presidential" message last night, President Trump just told the American people "don"t worry" about the healthcare bill...



And also from his POTUS account...



           But, The Wall Street Journal is less optimistic, and in an overnight opinion piece, it lashes out at Friday"s GOP fiasco and names the "ObamaCare Republicans" who were behind the stinging last minute failure to repeal Obamacare.          


* * *


The ObamaCare Republicans: The GOP right blows up its best chance to reform government.


House Republicans pulled their health-care bill shortly before a vote on Friday, and for once the media dirge is right about a GOP defeat. This is a major blow to the Trump Presidency, the GOP majority in Congress, and especially to the cause of reforming and limiting government.


The damage is all the more acute because it was self-inflicted. President Trump was right to say on Friday that Democrats provided no help, but Democrats were never going to vote to repeal President Obama’s most important legislation. And that’s no excuse. Republicans have campaigned for more than seven years on repealing and replacing ObamaCare, and they finally have a President ready to sign it. In the clutch they choked.


Speaker Paul Ryan and Mr. Trump worked together and to their credit to broker a compromise between the GOP’s moderate and conservative wings. Their bill worked off the reality that the U.S. health system has changed under ObamaCare and thus an orderly transition is necessary to get to a free-market system without throwing millions off insurance. The GOP also is a center-right coalition with competing views and priorities. The bill had flaws but was the largest entitlement reform and spending reduction in recent decades.


That wasn’t good enough for the 29-or-so members of the House Freedom Caucus who sabotaged this fragile legislative balance. When one of their demands was met, they dug in and made another until they exceeded what the rest of the GOP conference could concede. You can’t have a good-faith negotiation when one party doesn’t know how to say yes—or won’t.


The Washington chorus now claims Mr. Ryan made a mistake by leading with health care, and perhaps in retrospect he did. But he was responding to demands for immediate repeal by the same conservatives who later abandoned him. They wanted a repeal-only vote that had no chance of passing, which is why Mr. Ryan and Senate Republicans worked on the compromise of repeal and replace.


The critics assailed the bill as “ObamaCare Lite,” but the result of their rule-or-ruin strategy will now be the ObamaCare status quo, and Mark Meadows (North Carolina), Jim Jordan (Ohio), Louie Gohmert (Texas) and the rest own all of its problems. Please spare everyone your future grievances about rising health spending or an ever-larger government.


The grand prize for cynicism goes to Senator Rand Paul, who campaigned against the bill while offering an alternative that hasn’t a prayer of passing. “I applaud House conservatives for keeping their word to the American people and standing up against ObamaCare Lite,” said Dr. Paul. “I look forward to passing full repeal of ObamaCare in the very near future.”


There will be no such repeal in this Congress, and probably not in any other. Republicans run the government and that means they are responsible for what happens in health care. Messrs. Trump and Ryan are right that the ObamaCare markets are imploding, and prices will rise and choices will shrink again next year on present trends. Republicans can try to blame Democrats, but they’re in charge.


Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price can use regulation to improve insurance markets at the margin, but the bill would have given him more reform tools. The Trump Administration is inevitably invested in improving ObamaCare instead of standing up a replacement, and the voters harmed by rising premiums and declining choices may punish Republicans in the 2018 midterms.


This failure also reveals the unfortunate skills gap between Democrats and modern Republicans in practical legislative politics. Democrats have their Bernie Sanders faction, which claimed to “oppose” ObamaCare in 2009-10 for lacking a government-run public insurance option. But the far left voted for the bill anyway because they concluded, rightly, that a new entitlement was a great leap toward single-payer national health care.


An ideal free health-care market is never going to happen in one sweeping bill. The American political system is designed to make change slow and difficult, thank goodness. Republicans have to build their vision piece by piece, carefully gauging how to sustain their policy gains politically—the same way Democrats expanded the welfare and entitlement state over the last century.


But much of the current conservative establishment profits from fanning resentments, not governing. Legislative compromises don’t help Heritage Action raise money for its perpetual outrage machine. An earlier generation of leaders at Heritage understood that the goal of winning elections was to achieve something. The current leaders seem happy with failure.


Heritage was joined in opposition by the Club for Growth and the Koch brothers’ political machinery, also on grounds that the bill was imperfect. But good luck finding any comparable chance to shrink government. This demonstration of GOP dysfunction will make Members even more skittish about taking other difficult votes, including tax reform.


Mr. Trump said Friday he wants to move forward on cutting taxes, and Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady wants to do the same. We wish them luck and support the effort. But health reform is about a single industry. Tax reform implicates every industry and its denizens are the definition of the Washington swamp. Success on health care would have produced momentum and confidence that Republicans could fulfill their promises. Now Democrats and the swamp rats smell blood.


Perhaps Mr. Trump and the GOP can recover from this debacle, but as an opening act to a new Presidency the collapse of his first legislative campaign is ominous. In business Mr. Trump liked to “get even.” He’s got some scores to settle with the Freedom Caucus.

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Dow Hits 20,600 After Trump Hints At "Massive Tax Plan"

Trump did it again: one week after he promised to unveil "phenomenal" tax cuts, moments ago in his meeting with retail CEOs, who are meeting with the president to get him to kill the border adjustment tax idea, he pulled another OPEC, using the precise word the algos were looking for, and this time said that "tax reform is one of the best opportunities to really impact our economy," Trump said. "So we"re doing a massive tax plan that"s coming along really well."


He also said that there will be a “much, much simpler tax code” that will lower rates for everybody in every bracket. He added that “other than H & R Block, people are going to love it.”


Of course, people would love to know when it is coming, to which Trump had no explicit answer, instead saying the "tax plan will be submitted in not so distant future”



Trump then said that “there’s a lot of confidence in our economy right now,” citing both the jobs report and the level of the stock market.


Speaking to the retail CEOs, Trump added the retail industry is important to country in supporting millions of jobs, which however did not explain if the BAT will be cut - if so, then the level of corporate tax cuts would be far less, as there would be no partial revenue offset needed to balance the roughly $2 trillion in revenue losses over the next decade from cutting the tax rate from 35% to 20%.


Retailers are among the biggest opponents of border adjustability, arguing that it would result in higher prices for consumers. A number of Republican senators also have concerns about the proposal, putting its future in jeopardy.



The White House has given mixed signals on whether the president supports the border adjustment tax. Trump called it "too complicated" in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, but the White House later said that taxing imports could be one way to pay for a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. Gary Cohn, head of Trump"s National Economic Council, told CNBC earlier this month that border adjustability is "one of the options that"s on the table."


Trump during Wednesday"s meeting also spoke about his plans to cut regulations. "We"re cutting regulations in just about every industry," he told executives from companies including Target; J.C. Penney; Best Buy; Gap; AutoZone; Walgreen Boots; Tractor Supply; Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft Stores.  The retail executives are slated to meet with House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) later on Wednesday.


As for stocks, one the headline scanning algos saw "massive" tax plan statement and the following headline...


  • TRUMP: WE WILL LOWER TAX RATES FOR PERSONAL, BUSINESS

... they quickly pushed stocks to new all time high - breaking above 20,600!!


Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Trump Backs Delay Of Obamacare Repeal After Pressure From Rand Paul

As we reported earlier today, while many items on the Trump agenda for both the "first day" and the rest of 2017, could take a substantial amount of time and effort before they are legislated and implemented, one thing that there was virtually unanimous consensus on, was that Trump would immediately launch the repeal of Obamacare, even if replacing the Affordable Care Law would take considerably longer (as it would require bipartisan support). 


However, it now appears that even the prompt repeal of Obamacare is in question as Trump has now backed waiting to repeal the Affordable Care Act until a replacement proposal is in hand, following in a Friday night phone call with Rand Paul, the Kentucky Republican said Monday, adding to momentum for changing GOP leaders’ strategy on dismantling the 2010 health-care law.


Paul has emerged a vocal leader of a growing group of Republican senators expressing concerns with GOP plans to vote to repeal the health law early this year, then to hammer out over weeks or months what would replace it after a two- to three-year transition. Cited by the WSJ,  Paul said in an interview “I believe we should vote on replacement the same day we vote on repeal,” and added that Trump called the senator on Friday night “to say he agrees completely."


As the WSJ adds, a Trump transition official confirmed that the incoming president spoke with Mr. Paul on Friday, and said meetings are under way to determine how a replacement law could be approved at the same time—or close to it—that a repeal of the law is approved. Last week, Trump personally warned congressional Republicans on Twitter to “be careful” about the political consequences of moving quickly to repeal the law.


The push from both Trump and Paul, as well as at least five other GOP senators, will put pressure on Republican leaders to accelerate the process of crafting a unified GOP replacement plan. Republicans have proposed dozens of ideas over the years for overhauling the health-care system but have yet to coalesce around a plan.


In other words, in a shift on a popular Nency Pelosi statement, the Republicans "will not repeal it eventually come up with a replacement", but will do both at the same time. The question now is how long such a unified process could take.





Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who met with Mr. Trump in Trump Tower on Monday morning, appeared to indicate Sunday that Republicans were accelerating the process of settling on a replacement plan.



“We will be replacing it rapidly after repealing it,” the Kentucky Republican said Sunday on CBS. He wasn’t specific about the timing of the drafting of a new health-care system, or what it would entail, but he said, “There ought not to be a great gap between the first step and the second.”



Trump has said before that he wanted to “simultaneously” repeal and replace the health-care law, but GOP leaders on Capitol Hill hadn’t committed to that timeline.


One thing is clear: both repealing and replacing the health law would be complicated legislative maneuvers with sweeping repercussions for both the health-care industry and millions of American consumers. It could also take years, and keep Obamacare in its current form for a long time, contrary to Trump"s campaign promises.


Reince Priebus said on Sunday that a new health plan might not be ready immediately after gutting the Affordable Care Act. “It may take time to get all the elements of the replacement in place,” Mr. Priebus said on CBS. “The full replacement may take more time than an instantaneous action.”


As reported previously, Republicans are planning to use a special process tied to the budget to pass legislation repealing the health law with a simple majority, but they can afford to lose few GOP votes. They would need all Republicans and several Democratic votes to then approve any replacement health-care system, in order to reach the 60 votes needed to clear the chamber’s procedural hurdles. Paul, who has objected to the budget maneuver over its spending levels, said that he would like to see what would replace the health law weeks later, after House and Senate committees have detailed how the ACA would be repealed. The budget specifies that they must produce their legislation by Jan. 27.


Meanwhile, in a separate article, Bloomberg reports that top advisers to President-elect Donald Trump will meet Monday evening with House Speaker Paul Ryan and his policy staff to discuss taxes and other policy issues, according to two people familiar with the plans. Topics on the agenda include tax reform, the budget, infrastructure and Obamacare.


As a reminder, tax reform was the other item that Trump is expected to be able to enact relatively painlessly.


Ryan and his team intend to walk through the tax reform plan House Republicans put forward last year, calling it a "priority issue" for the House and the president-elect, according to the other person, a Republican aide. House Ways & Means Committee Chair Kevin Brady will be the House Republicans’ point person on tax reform, the aide said. According to Bloomberg, though Trump and Ryan agree on plenty, points of contention include tariffs for companies that move jobs overseas, a $1 trillion infrastructure plan, as Trump has called for, and how many people an Obamacare replacement should insure.


Present at the meeting will be all the top economic Incoming White House aides Reince Priebus, Stephen Miller, Stephen Bannon, Jared Kushner and, of course, former Goldman President Gary Cohn.