A well-informed teen who found himself subject to unwarranted police intimidation and harassment, flexed his rights in the presence of two NYPD cops and proceeded to own them.
The post WATCH: Teen Flexes His Rights and Owns Two Cops Harassing Him for No Reason appeared first on The Free Thought Project.
A majority of our society essentially walks around without knowing or actively exercising their rights. In fact, some do not even know what their rights are or why they are so important. Moreover, they would rather wave their freedoms afforded in this country at the first signs of a problem. One example of this is during a manhunt for the Boston Marathon bombing suspects, police and federal agents spent the day storming people’s homes and performing illegal searches.
In the Constitution, the word “inalienable” means unable to be taken away from or given away by a possessor. That means these are natural rights are not contingent upon the laws, customs, or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore ours for life. Many of us know this, but still our rights as citizens of the United States are violated by the police. For instance, we all want to cooperate and accommodate police officers when they ask us questions. However, some of those questions are not meant to be friendly, but to gain knowledge on you. While you are cooperating with the police officer and putting forth all of this information about yourself, you are providing evidence against yourself that they can use if need be. Remember? Everything you say and do, can be used against you. In this case, it’s best to remain silent.
In Voices of Liberty, reporter Britt Hysen talks to Nina Hodjat, an attorney for DUI Partners. The two discuss how to speak to officers and exercise your rights respectfully at police checkpoints. Nina states that it is best to stay calm and be respectful when exercising your rights. She states that “human element factors come into play in situations such as this. If you are respectful to the police officers, the situation should not escalate. If you are being aggressive, chances are, they will respond to that and become aggressive back. Just stay calm.”
Know Your Rights
Know that you can invoke your rights. This downloadable card lists your rights and can be used when talking with police officers. When you are going through checkpoints, always be respectful use these tips when exercising your rights:
Source: www.aclu.org
In an effort to further inform the public, feel free to post this on your social media pages to get the word out on how vital it is for all of us to know our rights. The more we exercise our rights, the more aware we will be when they are being abused.
What advice can you give about protecting your freedoms?
The post Invoking Your Rights At Police Checkpoints (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.
“The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.” – Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788
With all of that is going on with these anti gunner politicians (surrounded by armed security detail) working hard for their special interest groups, rather then upholding the US Constitution, the US Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold, instead, and in using the tactic of “necessity” based off of some tragedy or massacre, which, in many cases, are induced false flag events (conspired black ops Jeremiah 11:9), one must understand the methods and the language of their enemies.
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.” – William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783
“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787
Furthermore, when you look to the anti-gunner corrupt politicians and their methods one must ask where did they derive their delegated authority to encroach upon the God-given RIGHTS of the American people? I cannot find it! Why? Because it isn’t there (Hosea 4:6).
Americans must come to terms that corrupt politicians are not the type that you can help or rehabilitate; they are the type that you must lawfully remove, or you will lose your God-given RIGHTS! (Article 2, Section 4, US Constitution)
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – President Thomas Jefferson
You must fight for your God-given RIGHTS! (Deuteronomy 1:8; James 2:14-26)
It is the difference between a FREE people, and an enslaved people there are no in-between (Luke 11:2).
“To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them.” – George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788
Therefore, it might be well for you to take a couple of minutes and read what our forefathers had said in their writings during the ratifications to establish gun rights to Americans as a whole, namely the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights. Who knows better what the Second Amendment means than the Founding Fathers that established our God-given rights?
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
First, who are the militia?
“I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” – James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789
“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788
“What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty …. Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins.” – Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, I Annals of Congress 750, August 17, 1789
Second, look to our American forefathers and how what they established contradicts the corruptions in the face of the present day criminal politicians (Psalm 94:20; Luke 22:48; John 8:44).
“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” – Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787
“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined…” – George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776
“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787
“The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
“A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785
“The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
“On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 12 June 1823
“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” – James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788
“This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty…. The right of self-defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.” – St. George Tucker, Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1803
“The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms, like law, discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The balance ofpower is the scale of peace. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. And while a single nation refuses to lay them down, it is proper that all should keep them up. Horrid mischief would ensue were one-half the world deprived of the use of them; for while avarice and ambition have a place in the heart of man, the weak will become a prey to the strong. The history of every age and nation establishes these truths, and facts need but little arguments when they prove themselves.” – Thomas Paine, “Thoughts on Defensive War” in Pennsylvania Magazine, July 1775
“The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.”
– Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 1833
“For it is a truth, which the experience of ages has attested, that the people are always most in danger when the means of injuring their rights are in the possession of those of whom they entertain the least suspicion.” – Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 25, December 21, 1787
“If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair.” – Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28
“As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.” – Tench Coxe, Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789
“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” – Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778
We have heard over and over from criminal anti-gunner politicians that we do not need 30 round magazines when it comes to our ability to protect ourselves.
Just a reminder to all, we do not need 30 rounds to hunt with, correct, but the Second Amendment was not written in case the deer turn against us, it was given in case our government does.
“The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it!”
Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media
The post Forefathers Face-off with Modern Politicians – The 2nd Amendment is a God-Given RIGHT, Americans, Not a Privilege! (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.
[image: The Sleuth Journal]
.
While Ryan did not say it, he demonstrated something — there is no signature on the Constitution representing the federal government. I do not know that I’ve ever heard it put more clearly than Ryan Bundy revealed it on January 20 2018. It’s foolish for me to try to approximate in words the spirit which filled that building in Paradise, so I’ll let it go after meekly saying that an uplifting momentum is growing around the Bundy movement and all of their family members and friends are like solid gold nuggets in the American lands; a gold of the human soul which shines brightly around their faces like a blessed aura, a radiance of innocent beauty.
The Mental Militia salutes the Bundy family and their friends like Shawna Cox the Hammonds, Jeanette Finicum, Dan and Roxsanna Ryan, et al. Their faith is indomitable and is inspiring.
Speakers at the rally Included:
Cliven Bundy
Ryan Bundy
Andrea Parker
Billy Hill
Chris Briels
Sen. Jennifer Fielder
Shawna Cox
Dan Ryan
Roxsanna Ryan
Videos by Elias Alias, Founder of The Mental Militia.
The Bundy’s Arrive in Paradise, MT.
Senator Fielder and Roxsanna Ryan Opening
Ryan Bundy in Paradise Pt. 1
Ryan Bundy in Paradise Pt. 2
Ex-Fire Chief from Oregon Chris Briels
Senator Fielder
Shawna Cox
Cliven Bundy Pt. 1
Cliven Bundy Pt. 2
The post Freedom and Property Rally: The Cliven Bundy Story (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.
An Oregonian constitutional rights flexer shows how to verbally manhandle even the most seasoned police officer for violating his constitutional rights.
We all have inherent rights – unalienable, God-given, natural rights – regardless of whether a nation’s government recognizes it or writes it down as law.
We all have inherent rights, no matter whether the governing authority of a particular geographical area recognizes it or whether it has been written down on a piece of paper as law. People from different from societies and cultures call these rights slightly different things. In the USA, they have been referred to as unalienable rights ever since the 1776 Declaration of Independence. Some call them natural rights to distinguish them from State-granted rights (which are not really rights but rather privileges). Others simply call them human rights. From a more religious perspective they are called God-given rights. Those who are uncomfortable with the term “God” may prefer intrinsic rights or inherent rights. But, whatever you call them, they are a universal concept; they are a natural extension of ourselves with which we are born, and which we possess just by virtue of being human.
A right is an entitlement to a need. Inherent rights are the extension of intuitive self-knowing, of knowing that we are entitled to have our basic needs met. They are the verbalization of an instinctual feeling that we are worthy of love, peace and abundance, and that we deserve certain things because we are alive. These rights “come with” us, and we carry them around, like a tortoise carries its shell. Technically, inherent rights have no material existence outside the human mind, so from one perspective you could say we have invented them. However, I believe they are pointing to something profound and ineffable, like a mapping device for how we are supposed to make our way in this world and socially interact with others.
Inherent rights may be an invention, but they are a very important one, for they are the means by which we determine justice, fair entitlement and peaceful conflict resolution. They are also the key means by which we ensure, in law, in theory and hopefully in practice, that we live in a free society and that the will of tyrannical governments is restrained. Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence and the 3rd President of the USA, had a lot of things to say about rights. They formed a big part of the basis of how he thought and viewed the world, and thus how the US came to be as a nation. Here are some quotes from him:
“Nothing … is unchangeable but the inherent … rights of man.” – Thomas Jefferson to John Cartwright, 1824
“Under the law of nature, all men are born free, every one comes into the world with a right to his own person, which includes the liberty of moving and using it at his own will. This is what is called personal liberty, and is given him by the Author of nature, because necessary for his own sustenance.” – Thomas Jefferson, Legal Argument, 1770
This is Jefferson on balancing your rights vs. the rights of others:
“Of liberty I would say that, in the whole plenitude of its extent, it is unobstructed action according to our will. But rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law,’ because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual.” – Thomas Jefferson to Isaac H. Tiffany, 1819
Jefferson considered the primary – and only – function of Government was to safeguard the rights of all its citizens:
“To secure these rights [to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness], governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” – Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence, 1776
“It is to secure our rights that we resort to government at all.” – Thomas Jefferson to Francois D’Ivernois, 1795
You can understand how important the concept of inherent rights for a free society when you consider that from a Jeffersonian point of view the only reason for the existence of Government is to secure the inherent rights of those who elected it, and that the only basis for the authority of Government is that it has the consent of the governed.
Inherent rights were given a special qualifier by Jefferson and the other Founding Fathers of the USA: unalienable. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, unalienable is defined as “incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred”, i.e. something which cannot have a lien or claim placed against it. The idea is that unalienable rights are yours, period, as long as you live. They can neither be bought nor sold. They can’t be used as bargaining chips. Any system which would allow the “selling” of rights would inevitably lend itself to plutocracy or rule by the rich, because they would buy up everyone else’s rights and thus ultimately enslave them.
As an aside to the main discussion of inherent rights, one piece of trickery is worth highlighting. The de facto corporate US Government (not the de jure government of the US Republic as authorized by the US Constitution) changed the wording of the Constitution and other legal US documents when it took control of the USA in 1871, the year it incorporated itself. This was when admiralty, maritime or commercial jurisdiction started to creep onto the land and overtake common law jurisdiction. This impostor (the corporate US Government) substituted the word inalienable for unalienable.
What’s the big deal, you may ask? A lot, actually. It’s not just semantics. Changing that one vowel at the start of the word changed the meaning immensely. Unalienable rights are those which cannot be sold or transferred, whereas inalienable rights can be! As this source states:
“You can surrender, sell or transfer inalienable rights if you consent, either actually or constructively. Inalienable rights are not inherent in man and can be alienated by government. Persons [i.e. corporations] have inalienable rights. Most state constitutions recognize only inalienable rights.”
So that one tiny change resulted in an entirely new system where your rights are subject to the whims of Government and tyrants, if you choose to unwittingly enter into that jurisdiction.
It is crucial to be able to distinguish between genuine inherent rights and State-granted fake rights, which are actually privileges in disguise. As soon as you introduce a governing body or authority which grants itself the power to issue “rights”, you no longer have inherent rights. You are put in the position of needing to request, ask or beg for your fake rights. The authority then has power over you by deciding whether to grant your permission or not. In societies which descend into tyranny, it is a very common theme that those which challenge the governments and speak out against corrupt authorities are denied certain things which they would normally otherwise get – if they just kept quiet and went along with the status quo.
Two examples are worth mentioning here. The first are the US “Civil Rights” signed into law by LBJ during the 1960s. As much as I deeply respect Martin Luther King and the struggle to end racism and discrimination, the civil rights passed to appease those demanding change were not the natural, unalienable, inherent rights upon which US law is based; they are fake rights or privileges.
The United Nations’ collectivist Universal Declaration of Human Rights seems so noble and beneficent, but’s it a prime example of privileges disguised as rights. The Rockefeller-created UN believes it has the power to grant these human rights, so they are not unalienable or inherent rights.
Likewise (and this may be disappointing to some) the universal human rights declared by the UN (United Nations) are fake rights. The UN was set up by the Rockefellers at the end of WW2 to ultimately become the One World Government of the New World Order, something which the League of Nations was never able to achieve. The Rockefellers donated the land upon which the UN buildings were constructed. The UN is an entirely collectivist organization, based on the principle that the group takes supremacy over the individual, and that individual rights must be sacrificed for the greater good. The human rights of the UN are no inherent rights, but rather are issued with conditions attached by a governing body, which could at a later date modify them. Look at these clauses from The Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
“These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” – Article 29
The purpose and principle of the UN is a centralized One World Government (under the control of the elite). So if we don’t accept this purpose, are we not allowed to exercise our rights and freedoms?
“Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.” – Article 28
New World Order, anyone?
The answer to these questions is a resounding YES! You don’t need to live in the US with the Declaration of Independence/Constitution, or the UK with the Magna Carta, to gain or be worthy of natural rights. Every single human has inherent rights. They are universal. It doesn’t matter if for instance Australia doesn’t have a Bill of Rights like the US. You still have a right to life and to liberty. You still have a right to breathe, eat, drink, sleep, freely associate, hold whatever opinions you want – and a right to travel too. The question is not whether you have these inherent rights – the question is whether your Government will respect them or not. That will depend on how true you can hold to your convictions, and how close you are in your country to a critical mass of people collectively asserting these natural rights, so that a Government can no longer ignore them away. Judging by the fantastic growth of the sovereign freeman movement all over the world (including Canada with the likes of Robert Menard and Dean Clifford), I would say we are rapidly approaching a time when Governments will have no choice but to accept them.
Once people remember and recognize their true state – that they are sovereign beings and the master/creator of Government – they will naturally recognize their inherent rights and no longer doubt their existence or seek permission from any outside authority to ordain, legitimize or justify them. It’s the outer legal manifestation of an inner spirit knowing that we are all worthy and that Government only exists for our benefit.
Sources:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/DOCUMENTS/JEFFERSON/jeff1.html
http://www.gemworld.com/usa-unalienable.htm
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
http://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/magna-carta-an-introduction
http://deanclifford.info
The post We All Have Inherent Rights – Regardless Of Whether A Nation’s “Authority” Recognizes It appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.
After police accused a couple of being drug users, they attempted to ticket them for driving with an expired inspection—but the officer had the wrong date.
The latest “Divide and Conquer” trend in the United States is centered around the debate over which side is more patriotic—but a new study suggests that while many Americans claim to love the United States, only 25 percent of Americans could list the three branches of the government they so adamantly support.
According to the results from the annual Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey, only a quarter of Americans, or around 26 percent, can name all three branches of government, and more than one-third of Americans surveyed, or 37 percent, cannot name any of the rights guaranteed under the First Amendment.
Knowledge of the three branches of government—legislative, judicial and executive—is something many grade-school children are quizzed on, but the idea that adults in the U.S. aren’t aware of who makes up the government they are paying to create rules for them is unsettling. Even when money is being taken out of each of their paychecks, they still are not paying attention to who is spending it, and how its destination impacts the future of the nation.
Advertisment
Then there is the result from the survey that claims more than one-third of Americans cannot name the rights guaranteed to them under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Those rights—which include freedoms of speech, religion, the press and peaceful protest of the government—are now at the center of the great NFL debate.
When President Trump took to Twitter to call for NFL team owners to fire any players who took a knee during the National Anthem, he was violating the First Amendment. While a player’s decision to kneel may lead to him being fired based on the fact that his team is losing sponsors who do not support his actions, and the team’s owner now sees the player as a deterrent, his decision is acceptable because it is happening in the private sector.
… trump taking a veiled shot at colin kaepernick, says owner should say: "get that sonofabitch off the field right now… he"s fired!!" pic.twitter.com/ttbOd0VrPG
— fake nick ramsey (@nick_ramsey) September 23, 2017
The National Football League is a private organization. Donald Trump is a government official. Ultimately, football players are hired based on their ability to bring in revenue for their team. If a player’s actions are impacting how much revenue his team is generating, then his contract will end as a result, and it is simply business. But when a government official interferes and demands his firing, in this case, it crossed a line between government and its citizens that is guaranteed by the First Amendment.
READ MORE: Hungary Moves to Eliminate All NGO"s Funded by Globalist George Soros
Whether Americans are aware of what the branches of government are, or what rights they have under the Constitution, they are still American citizens by birth. However, the survey found that more than half of Americans are also uninformed about the rights of noncitizens. According to the results, 53 percent of respondents “incorrectly think it is accurate to say that immigrants who are here illegally do not have any rights under the U.S. Constitution.”
The annual Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey is conducted by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. It obtained results from 1,013 adults in the United States from Aug. 9-13.
As The Free Thought Project has reported, it was not until 2009 when the Department of Defense began “paying for patriotism” that NFL teams were present on the field during the National Anthem. Judging an individual’s love for his country by his demeanor during a song before a football game also begs the question: What’s Worse, a Kneeling Millionaire or 300,000 Vets Neglected to Death?
At the end of the day, true change is not going to come from the amount of controversy that is generated over a football player kneeling before a game. It will come when Americans stop getting distracted by “Divide and Conquer” propaganda, when they start becoming educated on how their government is spending the money it steals from their paychecks, and when they truly take ownership of their rights.
I can tell you from firsthand eyewitness experience, that there has been an ongoing, yet secretive, civil war among the highest departmental levels of American government for a very long time, perhaps since the end of the first civil American war (circa 1865), as the modern political “Red and Blue map” clearly denotes an almost identical dividing line in the “United” States, from that not so long ago time, up until this present hour.
Both modern-day domestic warring factions have intelligence and military assets, including advanced reconnaissance satellites and private commandos. Both have tens of thousands of other devoted personnel, living and working unseen among us. All of this (by mutual consent) is under the radar of the politicians and media, so as to not “panic” the public, allowing for day to day continuity of government, until the next breaking point occurs. (The last breaking point was the assassination of President Kennedy).
The question is, who are these two sides of this new hidden battle for our nation and what are their objectives?
The first American civil war was fought over “States Rights”, in that past case, for the “right” to own another person. As morally objectionable as such a practice was, what is forgotten is the greater argument and question of who holds the supremacy of governorship over the affairs of Individual Choice . . .
1) A central “federal” government, located hundreds or thousands of miles away from such localized persons (reminiscent of a “king” dictating edicts to his involuntary subjects, from which our Founding Fathers fled) . . .
Or . . .
2) A local leadership, more in tune with the topography and personal needs of their nearby citizenry, as proximity gains insight.
Logic would dictate that a person directly situated in a specific locale would have the optimum vantage point from which to govern their own area, rather than a distant bureaucrat, far away from such regional insight, experience, or habitation.
Why then is our country governed in the exact opposite way ?
Greed for power and control is the only answer.
While slavery was a form of attritional genocide that was rightfully put and end to at all cost, regardless of borders, once such an archaic fire was put out and clarity of thought was restored to the populous from this barbaric “way of life” that some may have wrongfully felt was “normal”, there is no reason whatsoever why neighborhood committees should not now thereafter be permanently restored as having the ultimate supremacy over the daily affairs of their own citizens, as was the case at the founding of this country. The authoritarian power of 1865 federal martial law has persisted long after the need for such at the war’s conclusion. Given an inch of power, the federal government then took a mile of it . . . and then some.
At the founding of America, if a neighborhood chose to have a “gun free” local zone, then that was their right to institute and enforce. If a neighborhood chose to allow “open carry” pistols, likewise, it was their local right to do so, rather than having a city, state, or “federal” bureaucracy dictate to them how to live their daily personal lives, issuing blind directives from thousands of miles away from their locale.
The fact is, if giving millionaires and billionaires tax cuts stimulates the economy (I suppose by them having extra money to then go out and hire more butlers, thusly “trickling down” their prosperity to the middle class), then giving money directly and individually to the middle class would likewise “trickle up” to the millionaires and billionaires (who own all of the manufacturing companies anyway, from which the middle class would then be giving their new money to in extra spending, purchasing such commodities from the businesses the affluent own), thusly benefiting the rich as well, just in a reversed fashion, which benefits the most individuals first, rather than the corporate few first.
If electricity can flow left to right down a copper wire, then it can certainly flow just as easily right to left down the same wire! Why then doesn’t the “federal” government benefit the largest number of persons first with its extra cash, rather than handing it over to the few corporate elite?
The reason is simple.
Because the “federal” government DOES NOT represent You.
It represents the rich and the corporate.
The total monetary sum recently used to “bail out” corrupt corporate banks, amounted to about the same as giving every American citizen, eighteen years of age or older, Five Thousand Dollars. If this were done instead of giving the rich even more money (which came from the poorer middle class’ taxes anyway), this would indeed greatly benefit the economy with this extra spending, benefitting the largest number of people possible during an economic crisis!
Why then, is this not done ???
The reason is simple.
Because the “federal” government DOES NOT represent You.
It represents the rich and the corporate.
The simple fact is, the “federal government” (whatever or whoever that is) is not truly interested in protecting or blessing the average citizen. If they were, they would use the aforementioned “Trickle-Up” economics instead, and they would not have just banned GMO labeling (also known as Truth Telling), even though a whopping 90% of Americans want GMO labeling!
Whoever is in control,
they are controlling The Truth.
This is why whoever owns the “media” is so important.
Has 90% of Americans ever agreed on anything ? . . .
And yet . . . Still to NO AVAIL !!!
Why?
Because the “federal” government DOES NOT represent You.
It represents the rich and the corporate.
The rich corporations did not want GMO labeling,
so THEY got their way over the 90% MAJORITY.
How can this happen in an alleged “democracy” ?
Because the “democracy” is only Alleged.
As electricity can just as easily flow from left to right, as right to left, down a copper wire, government could be run with the exact opposite methodology as “head down”, instead, “feet up”, starting with neighborhood councils having the supremacy, then city government, then county government, then state, then lastly “federal”, who would simply serve to fill the role of international diplomat and to coordinate state military reserves in the event of international war (assuming states voluntarily joined what they believed to be a just cause).
This was precisely the way American society was governed at the time of the signing of the “Declaration of Independence”, the TRUE standard of our country!
Who won the first American Civil War? The “north” ?
No.
The “Federal Government” did.
Who then, exactly, is the “Federal Government”???
As seen by the CIA elimination of past “Democratic” president John Kennedy (who threatened to “scatter the CIA to the wind” just weeks before his assassination by them), and most recently seen by the organized CIA opposition to the current “Republican” president Donald Trump, it is NOT the Congress, Senate, or even the President who runs the “federal” government.
It is the CIA.
Who started and the Vietnam War with an admitted falsified attack on Americans, blamed on the North Vietnamese? The President? The Congress? The Senate?
No.
The CIA.
Who just recently de-selected National Security Advisor Michael Flynn? The President? The Congress? The Senate?
No.
The CIA.
(As Michael Flynn also intended to “scatter to the wind” this dangerous, un-American, rogue agency, so the CIA struck first and arranged to have him fired so that he could not do it.)
It is amazing to me that CIA/NSA employee of thirty years, William Binney, admitted that the CIA/NSA spies on the telephone conversations and emails of all Presidents, their top staff, members of Congress, the Senate, and all judges of the Supreme Court, in order to lead the government themselves, by steering these individuals with blackmail and coercion . . .
Admitted . . .
Yet, NO ONE DOES ANYTHING ABOUT IT !!!!!!!
The “federal government” ADMITS that it “lost” TEN TRILLION DOLLARS . . .
Yet, NO ONE DOES ANYTHING ABOUT IT !!!!!!!
Guess who, years ago, purchased, with this “missing” money, AT&T, Verizon, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, the New York Times, Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Twitter, and the like, so that they could control what you believe to be the truth (though actually lies) and “legally” spy on all of their customers because they own the hard-drives on which your personal data is stored (not to mention that we all checked “yes” to agreeing to have our data “scanned”/READ so that we could receive their “free” services) ?
The CIA.
The reason for this is simple.
Control and Blackmail.
All presidents, and all people, whether the average citizen or members of congress, judiciary, police, military, and the like, all have “skeletons in the closet” (past acts of indiscretion which were painstakingly recorded by the CIA/NSA for this very purpose of coercion and blackmail). When the CIA wants a President, Judge, member of Congress/Senate, Police or Military Official to do their bidding, they simply blackmail them (though bribery is preferred, as this binds the subject willingly to the criminal enterprise, adding yet another person to its organizational strength and, more importantly, to the defense thereof).
This goes on at all levels of government (down to regional city council members), as well as in industry. All that the CIA has to do, is remind the current President, or CEO, or whoever, of the way they dealt with Kennedy, and compliance quickly follows.
Are there any in government who love what is Right more than life,
just as our Founding Fathers did ???
If so, you had better quickly rally your likeminded coworkers before it is too late.
Those who give in to this perpetual blackmail fail to realize, that they will eventually die anyway, and face Eternal judgment for their compliance with evil.
You might as well die on the side of Right,
because You are going to die anyway,
and reap an Eternal reward!
President Truman, the creator of the CIA, wanted to organize and centralize all of the “intelligence” he was receiving from various government agencies, hence his founding of the “CENTRAL Intelligence Agency”. Since then, the CIA has splintered back into sixteen separate tentacle agencies, undoing his sincere initiative.
On his deathbed, Truman fiercely regretted creating the CIA:
“It was a mistake. The CIA is equal to the Pentagon, one of which organization is one too many. There’s nobody keeping track of what they’re up to. The CIA has become a government all its own, and ALL SECRET. They don’t have to account to ANYBODY. Something our Founding Fathers did NOT have in mind. That’s a VERY dangerous thing in a democratic society, and it’s GOT TO BE PUT A STOP TO.”
No one listened and did ANYTHING about it.
Four decades later, the CIA is FOUR TIMES stronger.
If the President, current or future, REALLY wants to “Drain the Swamp”, then they must love Right and Truth more than life or reputation. They could easily shame BOTH the CIA, and their owned propaganda media, by disclosing this “ONE SMALL STEP” . . .
An executive order, disbanding ALL current “intelligence agencies” and putting them under the more levelheaded control of the less politicized military, forming a new branch thereof called “Military Intelligence”, and reclaiming the rightful focus of such an organization as being foreign spying, rather than domestic.
Unless this is done, the stranglehold of the CIA on America will only grow stronger and be more difficult to fight in the future. People simply fail to focus on the reality that they will die someday soon, and at that hour, they will either have peace of mind, or regrets, based on either being courageous, or cowardly, when confronted in their day to day lives with what they know to be evil. Standing up to it, or giving in to it.
Wouldn’t you rather be a dead hero than a live coward?
I will discuss this, and much more, in this episode of “Conspiracy Corner News”, linked below and HERE. Be sure to also read the numerous articles referenced below, at the very end of this writing.
Brother Bart
Thank you for your kind support.
Shop on Amazon by Clicking on the Button Below
Bart Sibrel is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com
When you want to Shop on Amazon, please come back to this page and Click on the Large Button above to visit the Amazon Homepage, or Copy and Paste the following url into your Browser’s Bookmarks as “Amazon” to Save for Future Shopping Use (http://amzn.to/2bvcs9I).
Thank you!
References
CIA’s Ten Trillion Dollar Surplus
The CIA vs. the Supreme Court & Congress
CIA Admits to Spying on Everyone
The CIA & Media are One and the Same
President Truman Regrets Creating the CIA
The Truth About the “Moon Landings”
