Showing posts with label drinking water. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drinking water. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2018

Selco: The Dirty Truth About Water and Sanitation When the SHTF

This article was originally published by Selco at The Organic Prepper



Note from Daisy Luther: The biggest concerns in any long-term emergency are water and sanitation because the lack of these things can cause serious illness or even death. Because water and sanitation aren’t nearly as glamorous as guns and gadgets, they’re often overlooked in a preparedness plan. I asked Selco some questions about these important issues in this interview. The truth about it is dirty, unpleasant, and something for which you absolutely must plan.


Once there was no more running water, how did you get drinking water?


Just like most other things (especially when it comes to non-preppers) it was a matter of levels and layers.


The tap water was going on and off for a few days before service went completely off, so people had a few bottles of drinking water stored. But of course, most of us thought everything going to be restored very soon so nobody had thought about storing big amounts of water.


When it comes to lack of water and being unprepared, the levels and layers that I am mentioning meant that you first looked and asked for tap water (clean) for drinking. Then collecting water from rooftops sounded like a good idea. Then drinking directly from the river was good if there was no other source. And then, finally, when there was no other source. you simply drink dirty water even when you were sure it is quite dirty.


It was a matter of low resources, desperation, and of course low skill levels.


Our main sources were rain and the river.


Can you tell us about your rainwater collection system?


It was not anything smart, especially in the beginning.


The gutter system normally took water from the roof through pipes into the underground collectors and sewers. When we concluded that the running water was not coming back, we simply sawed off a piece of gutter and pushed it inside the main gutter that led from the roof system (on the side of the house that looked inside the yard). Then we collected water inside a barrel.


We just used the water collectment system that was existing there already, and just cut it off at a lower point, before the water was “lost” and redirected the water into a barrel.


It is actually pretty amazing how much water you can collect from the roof during one summer storm. A lot.


When it comes to that system of water collecting our main problem was lack of containers, because even if there is a huge amount of water to “catch” from the rain, we did not have enough adequate containers for that.


Probably if we were prepared in a smart way for that, our water problems would have been easier.


How did you purify/filter water for drinking and cooking?


Two main ways: boiling and filtering.


Filtering of the water was very rudimentary. We did not use any real filters, and people did not know how to make anything too complicated.


The most complicated filter that I saw in those times was a slightly changed version of a “bottle ” filter with rocks and sand with added cloth inside.


We used cloths for filtering, or gauze. If water was visibly contaminated (particles) we would repeat the procedure until the water looked satisfying for us.


Boiling was a widespread method of making water drinkable, and often the quality of stoves and fuel for it were “measured” by the time needed for water to boil.


Were the rivers and streams contaminated? If so, how quickly after things went bad?


River and streams in cities were polluted (if we talk about drinking) before the war because poor care was taken of it, and it was mainly because of industry.


When SHTF that kind of pollution went down because of obvious reasons (everything stopped working) but other kinds of pollutants were there. City services did not work and many people lived next to that river (upstream too). So it was polluted with everything, including bodies from time to time.


We drink it, sometimes even without boiling and filtering. I survived it, but I was sick many times, probably because of that.


How did you keep yourself clean?


By the standards from before SHTF and standards today we were not clean most of the time, because most of the time we did not have enough water for that.


By the standard of that time (SHTF) we managed to use very small amounts of water to keep ourselves as clean as possible.


Most of the time it was something like sponge bathing with a bottle of water.


It was a joke at that time. Often people would say, “I just had shower using wet napkin only(from MRE)”


Years later I saw a similar scene in a movie, and it brought memories back.


And actually it is a great thing to have a huge stash of those ready for SHTF.


When it was safe, we used the river for that, or people sometimes simply get naked in their yard during the rain.


What did you do for a toilet?


Very close to our house, through the destroyed building, there was small piece of land, which was “hidden” from all sides. We used that as a simple “dig a hole” latrine. Later we built something like primitive field latrine.


It was a simple hole in the ground covered with wooden boards, with channels leading away.


It worked more or less, but we had the good luck of having that place with enough “ground” close to home where it was pretty safe for spending that time there.


Folks use toilet everywhere that was available. Inside toilets were mostly out of use mainly because of the lack of water.


Of course. it contrubituted greatly to the city being a very dirty place.


Did you see an increase in sanitation-related illnesses like typhus, cholera? How did you treat those illnesses?


Everybody was at least once really sick from diseases that probably were caused by lack of hygiene, bad water and bad food.


Diarrhea, vomiting, exhaustion…


A lot of people had a couple of times heavy episodes of that, because simply, the whole chain of hygiene was really bad and broken.


Either you had problems with waste disposal, or bad water, or bad food, or simply you lacked personal hygiene.


It was a constant problem.


Sanitation problems were solved in a way that people would just throw away garbage from their own houses, as far as possible, or burn it when it was possible.


Because the system was out (of taking out garbage from that point) the result was that city was suffocating in garbage.


Diseases were inevitable.


Just like any other diseases they treated depending on knowledge and resources. In essence, people would try to cover it with medicines if possible and available, and with natural remedies.


Also, the sick person would be separated from other folks if possible.


Often method (and pretty stupid in that time because other bad factors) was to just leave a sick man to clean on itself, without food or anything, just a really small amount of water.


Do you have suggestions for some ways we can prepare for water and sanitation needs?


People usually do not understand how much consideration they need to take into solving the problem of a working toilet.


It is partly because it is maybe not a cool topic to discuss, but also it is something that we have taken for granted for many years.


Forget about jokes like, “If the SHTF forget about the toilet, it will be all over the place.”


If you are living together with 4 members of your family and one day the SHTF and your toilet is not working anymore it is quite a big topic to think about because you suddenly realize how often you need to go to the toilet and problems that it can bring. (However that may sound funny now).


With improper toilet techniques you are at a high risk for diseases, and when the SHTF, any kind of disease or illness will cripple you because you might need to perform heavy tasks.


Not to mention that “a small cut can kill you” because most probably, you are going to be your own physician, pharmacist, nurse etc.


There is lots of advice about how to deal with human waste: portable camping toilets, digging a latrine, even using it as a fertilizer or using it as a fuel (drying it) etc.


Some of this advice is clearly from people who do not have a clue about urban SHTF. Others are cool, but they are like more advanced solution (still the basic problem exists), and some of them work only in a wilderness situation.


I like to start with a very basic solution that solves my number one problem: what to do if my toilet does not work in my house or my apartment in an urban area.


A very cool and simple solution (and no, I did not “invent” it, it was there for quite some time) is having plastic buckets (the size that a toilet lid can be installed on it) and many plastic (heavy duty) bags that can be “installed” inside that bucket.


You still need to get rid of those bags later, but it is doable.


That is your immediate urban survival latrine. You can add some ash inside to make it more usable.


Often people if you ask them “how will you use the toilet when SHTF.” they  talk about composting human waste, but your real problem is what do you do if SHTF and your toilet is not working, and you can not go out in woods (remember, you are in the city) or anywhere  because it is not safe.


People often mention the fact that your toilet might work even when SHTF, you are just gonna need water to flush it.


That is actually a problem and the reason why you need to look for alternate ways. Water is going to be a big problem, and it is gonna be hard to get for other even more important things not to mention toilet. (unless you are living right next to a river or similar).


Just try to figure out today how much water you “spend” daily for flushing the toilet and you’ll get the point.


And do not forget that there is a chance that your toilets might be flooded, depending of what kind of collapse it is and area where you live.


So the “bucket toilet” technique is a start. Everything else is an upgrade if you have the means, space, and solutions.


If you have close space to your home where it is possible to dig a hole and make outhouse it is a good solution. Again, it will work for some time.


We are talking now about urban survival, and no matter how wrong or funny it looks to you, the point is to get it done in the fastest and cleanest and simplest possible way, and in a way that is the easiest possible to get rid of that waste.


By that you are minimizing the risk of many diseases.


Go with simplest solutions first and then upgrade on that.


All of you can figure pretty easily how much water you spend every day for all of your needs.


Then use that number when you plan how much of water you need to acquire per day when SHTF (through rain, river, wells, your already “stashed” tanks of water etc.) and you’ll see that there is probably scary difference between liters (or gallons) that you are using today and what you are going to be able to get when SHTF.


That means few things.


First and actually most important that you need to understand differences between necessity and comfort, in a way that for example having hot tub is great thing, but you won’t die if you do not have it, while not drinking enough water will get you killed.


So using water when the SHTF gets a new dimension if you think in that way. Maybe you are not gonna be able to be clean all the time, but you’ll survive.


Another thing is that you need to have a stash of water. Often people forget it and concentrate on food only (not to mention weapons only).


It is really cheap and easy to store some amount of water in canisters or barrels and keep it fresh by “refreshing it”  on schedule.


There are calculations of how much time a man can live without water, but usually, there are no calculations of how much time a man can “operate” in hard conditions. You need to be able to run, hide, fight, be scared, be under stress, work hard. So, you need to have a stash of water immediatelly ready when SHTF.


Collecting water from your roof collection system and purifying it sounds cool maybe, but try being thirsty for a week looking at the sky while you are waiting for rain.


I use 50-liter barrels and 20-liter canisters for water stash, on the balcony and in the basement. And I have small bottles of water everywhere. Nothing smart or spectacular but it will do the job, at least until rain falls.


Pay attention to water containers, not only that they need to be usable for water, but also that you need to have them in big numbers and not only big barrels.


Big stuff is hard to move, and once you fill it (for example from the roof system) you may find out it is not possible to move it.


Also having too much “manipulation” with big containers means more chance that you are gonna pollute the water, so think about that too. For example, find a way how you are gonna fill your bottles from big containers and similar.


One more thing that comes to mind when it come to water collecting is tarps.


Tarps (nylon) are something that you absolutely need to have in order to help yourself during water collecting (collection and also for directing what you have collected).


Tarps have many uses in survival so you should have decent amount of them anyway.


It all comes to the levels and degree of SHTF that you might experience, but know that in some periods you’ll be forced to use a very low amount of water for hygiene.


A good method is using a sprinkler watering can and sponge for a bath.


Also, have other methods as a means of water-saving for hygiene for when times get really hard with water (like wet wipes, and hand sanitizers).


Ways to disinfect water to make it usable for drinking are numerous and all around the web. Sometimes the discussion about best method is so fierce that remind me of “best caliber for SHTF” discussion.


It is important to understand that some of the methods kill germs but do not make water completely safe for drinking.


I personally prefer a few ways for making water safe (or safer) to drink: bleach, iodine tincture, boiling ,homemade filters (sand, stone, charcoal…).


I did try few portable purifiers like steripen and hand pump filters during the physical survival courses) and they worked (I did not get sick). It would be interesting to test it in a long term situation, and yes, it is good to have them.


In the end, your plan all comes to the availability of water. For example, if you live close to a creek or river it changes your perspective completely in the long run.


About the Author


Selco survived the Balkan war of the 90s in a city under siege, without electricity, running water, or food distribution. In his online works, he gives an inside view of the reality of survival under the harshest conditions. He reviews what works and what doesn’t, tells you the hard lessons he learned, and shares how he prepares today. He never stopped learning about survival and preparedness since the war. Regardless what happens, chances are you will never experience extreme situations like Selco did. But you have the chance to learn from him and how he faced death for months. Real survival is not romantic or idealistic. It is brutal, hard and unfair. Let Selco take you into that world. Read more of Selco’s articles here: https://shtfschool.com/blog/ And take advantage of a deep and profound insight into his knowledge and advice by signing up for the outstanding and unrivaled online course. More details here: https://shtfschool.com/survival-boot-camp/

Friday, December 22, 2017

The #1 Reason Never To Buy Bottled Water Again (VIDEO)

The #1 Reason Never To Buy Bottled Water Again (VIDEO) | Screen-Shot-2015-12-21-at-9_45_58-AM | Environment General Health Multimedia Toxins


Huge companies like Pepsi, Nestlé, and Coca-Cola sell billions of units of Reverse Osmosis purified tap water each year, the inevitable consequence of which is the littering of our planet with plastic that will pollute the environment for hundreds of years. What if you could eliminate the “middle men,” thousands of dollars in costs, and tons of plastic in the process?


If you have followed our work at GreenMedInfo.com you know that water quality concerns figure top on our list, especially considering how toxic the environment and municipal tap water have become, as well as the fact that 99% of water molecules by number in your body are water. Clearly, people are waking up to the vital importance of consuming clean water, but a common question emerges: what water should I drink?


I, personally, drink Mountain Valley water out of glass whenever economic and logistical considerations make that possible. But when it comes to cooking, washing vegetables, or making hot beverages like tea and coffee, its simply not economical to use Mountain Valley. So what’s the solution?


Here’s An Economical Solution to the ‘Water Quality Problem’ I Use Daily


I have the great pleasure of introducing our followers to my colleague Peter Spiegel’s groundbreaking solution: the AquaTru™ water purification system. He has managed to make available, for the first time, the same 4-stage Reverse Osmosis technology used by the world’s largest beverage corporations to produce bottled water, but has miniaturized it to fit your countertop with no installation or plumbing required.


He also is contracting directly with the membrane manufacturer, eliminating thousands of dollars of “middle man” costs. This system also provides a cost effective alternative to extremely bulky and costly under-the-sink RO systems. Not only will you save a ton of money on pure water you will also save the environment from millions of pounds of plastic. For instance, the Pacific Instituteestimated that the U.S. consumer, in 2006 alone, bought 31.2 billion liters of water sold in plastic containers weighing a total of 1,800,000,000 pounds!


AquaTru™ is the first and only counter top water purifier that makes bottled-water-quality water right from your tap without any plumbing or installation. AquaTru’s exclusive, patent pending TruPure™ technology miniaturizes the same reverse osmosis technology used by all the major bottled brands and puts it into a compact countertop water purifier for the first time. AquaTru™ removes or substantially reduces virtually all the toxic chemicals  — including radioactive material like uranium! — in your tap water [more details provided below].


You can check out the special offer limited to GreenMedInfo subscribers here, or read more about this amazing technology in the details below…


What’s wrong with Tap Water?


The EPA has not set a new drinking water standard since 2001.


The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates about 100 contaminants in our tap water, but a study conducted by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) found over 300 harmful contaminants in tap water serving over 53.6 million Americans.


Harmful contaminants in our unregulated drinking water include:


– Disinfection byproducts


– Perchlorate (rocket fuel – read the Greenmedinfo.com exposure on “Perchlorate Gate“)


– MTBE (gasoline additive)


– Prescription drug residue like anti-depressants & hormones from birth control.


– Increasingly omnipresent radionuclides like Uranium-238


In case you don’t know, disinfection byproducts are carcinogens which are produced when drinking water-disinfectants like chlorine and chloramine react with naturally-occurring or decaying matter in the water to form byproducts that pose serious health risks.  An astounding 600+ have been identified in standard municipal tap water!


Nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural runoff contaminate our groundwater supply posing health risks.


A study by the EWG found that over 43 million Americans in 42 states drink water that is polluted with chromium, much of it likely being in the carcinogenic form of Chromium-6.


What’s wrong with typical fridge & pitcher filters?


They are filters, not purifiers. Most pitcher and refrigerator filters are only designed to make your water smell, look, or taste better, but not necessarily safer, which is of primary importance. Filters remove simple chemicals like chlorine, but may leave behind a toxic chemical concoction for you to drink.


What’s wrong with bottled water?


The #1 Reason Never To Buy Bottled Water Again (VIDEO) | Screen-Shot-2015-12-21-at-9_45_58-AM | Environment General Health Multimedia Toxins


According to the Pacific Institute, it takes over 17 million barrels of oil to produce the plastic required for bottled waters consumed by Americans in a year, which is enough oil to fuel more than 1 million cars for an entire year.


The Pacific Institute estimates that it takes 3 liters of water to create 1 liter of bottled water.


Over 73 billion half-liter bottles of water are consumed in the US per year. Only 29% are recycled, meaning 50 billion bottles end up in landfills or polluting our waterways.


The recommended eight glasses of water a day (1460 pints). At $.25 a pint (if you buy at Costco) that will cost you $365 a year. At a $1.00 a bottle at a convenience store that’s $1460.


And that’s not to mention the plastic chemicals that leach into the bottled water!


What’s right about AquaTru™?


With AquaTru™, your water isn’t just filtered….it’s purified.


Affordable and easy to maintain. No installation is necessary. It utilizes patent-pending TruPure™ reverse osmosis technology for nearly 4X the efficiency of regular RO systems. The 4-step reverse osmosis filtration process includes:


1. Mechanical Pre-Filter: Removes sediments and cloudiness (turbidity) from water


2. Reverse Osmosis Pre-Filter: Removes more than 99% of chlorine and chloramine which can damage the RO filter


3. High Efficiency US-Made Reverse Osmosis Membrane: Takes out metallic ions, salts, viruses, pollutants, drugs, etc.


The Japanese RO membrane manufacturer’s data shows it removes the following contaminants:


  • Arsenic = 95.00%

  • Asbestos = 95.00%

  • Barium = 99.90%

  • Chlorine = 99.90%

  • Chloramine = 99.00%

  • Cadmium = 99.00%

  • Copper = 99.00%

  • Chromium (hexavalent) = 99.00%

  • Cysts (cryptosporidium & giardia) = 99.99%

  • Fluoride = 90.00%

  • Lead = 99.00%

  • Mercury = 99.00%

  • MTBE = 90.00%

  • Nitrates = 90.00%

  • Perchlorate = 90.00%

Mike Adams of NaturalNews used ICP-MS instrumentation to assess the unit’s ability to remove heavy metals and radionuclides and found it removed the following:


  • Aluminum reduction = 92.99%

  • Copper reduction = 99.79%

  • Arsenic reduction = 99.90%

  • Strontium reduction = 98.80%

  • Cadmium reduction = 100.00%

  • Cesium reduction = 100.00%

  • Mercury reduction = 100.00%

  • Lead reduction = 99.90%

  • Uranium reduction = 100.00%

4. Activated Coconut Shell Carbon Filter: “Polishes” the water and removes any remaining volatile organic compounds (toxic gases)


5. Bisphenol Free, Non-Estrogenic Material Used (Tritan™): AquaTru™ uses Tritan™ copolyester material, which is the same material used by the Vitamix and Nutribullet and which was evaluated by 3rd-party research to be free of estrogenic and androgenic activity in 2012 (email us for the research document: info@greenmedinfo.com). Also, Tritan™ copolyester material is free of not only bisphenol A, but all bisphenols, e.g. bisphenols S, F, M, etc.


The filter features a compact footprint; sits easily on your counter or under any standard kitchen cabinet. Its easy-to-use dispensing button makes filling up your glass or water bottle fast & convenient. The removable dispensing tank can be stored in the fridge for cold drinking water. The digital display tells you when it’s time to change filters. The filters last two years or more. The unit is completely portable, so you can take it with you if you move.


Why AquaTru™?


We all need to drink water – a lot of it. What are you doing to make sure it’s safe, pure and healthy? Make sure you get the full story before choosing what goes into your body, what comes out of your pocketbook and what’s best for the world around you!


Ready to order your AquaTru™ water purifier?


Peter is making available the AquaTru™ available at special price. Check out the offer here.


For additional information, watch the eye-opening movie about the bottled water industry, “Tapped“:



© December 21, 2017 GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here http://www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.


The post The #1 Reason Never To Buy Bottled Water Again (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Sunday, December 17, 2017

Why There Is No Such Thing As ‘Safe’ Tap Water

Why There Is No Such Thing As


Despite being at the top of the global food chain and industrial developmental ladder, the United States has a poor track record for delivering uncontaminated drinking water to the public. Even the nicest restaurants are guilty of serving you directly from the tap. It’s time to get real about the ‘tap water problem,’ one of the most significant vectors of toxicity of our age…


Water is life, as the saying goes. And it’s more than just a poetic phrase. Water is so intrinsically connected to life, if you counted all the molecules in the human body, 99% of them would be water!


On average, a human life can be sustained for up to three weeks without food, but a person won’t survive more than a few days without water. Under extreme conditions, an adult can lose around one liter of water per hour, all of which needs to be readily replaced to maintain a healthy fluid balance. So, what could be more important than consuming high quality, non-contaminated water?


In the United States, most of the water we utilize comes from our domestic water tap. We cook with it, we bathe in it; we use it on our yards, and in our pools. And we rarely, if ever, consider how clean or safe it is to do so. But when it comes to drinking water, quality is not something that can be sacrificed in exchange for plentiful supply.


One of the most profound technological developments in the modern era was the implementation of mass public sanitation infrastructures and the subsequent availability of water free from feces and other biological contaminants. Indeed, this, along with improved nutrition and refrigeration technologies, was what was behind the widespread reduction in epidemic outbreaks in ‘infectitious diseases’ in the mid-tweintieth century and not the introduction of mass vaccination campaigns which came afterwards.  Drinking unclean water can cause either acute or chronic effects, depending on the nature of the contaminant, and the concentration. Dysentery, a common water-borne bacterial infection, causes acute reactions such as intestinal inflammation, and severe diarrhea. A serious condition, dysentery causes rapid dehydration, and an infection which can be fatal, if left untreated. It is still a common third-world killer today.


Yet, with the introduction of modern water sanitation technologies, another problem emerged: chronic, culminative poisoning to nonlethal doses of contaminants, such as most industrial chemicals. Fertilizer runoff, and other industrial pollutants, contaminate streams and rivers worldwide.


The Illusion of Safety / Not MY Tap!


It’s easy to think that living in the United States gives us a free pass from such concerns. But recent headlines speak to a darker reality.


You’ve heard about the ongoing battle for clean water in Flint, Michigan. But unsafe tap water is not a localized phenomenon. A recently released report found that 62 million Americans are exposed to unsafe drinking water. And often, these flag-raising issues don’t trigger safety responses until people start getting sick.


Safeguarding the health of our bodies includes ensuring that the water we drink has been properly filtered, or comes from a known-clean source such as a spring or an uncontaminated well. Only trust bottled water that comes from a reputable company.


And don’t let being in a nice restaurant in a big city lull you into a sense of complacency. From New York City to Encinitas, Portland to Boulder, veritable meccas of food quality and health consciousness are serving unfiltered tap water. You don’t have to see it to believe it.


Lead and Fluoride: Lethal Offenders


Among the most common water contaminants, none are as dangerous to our health as lead and fluoride. Studies show even low-dose lead exposure can cause brain damageand developmental problems in young people. Lead leaches into water systems through old, corroded pipes like the ones found in many turn-of-the-century cities and towns. This problem will worsen in coming years, as 20th century infrastructure continues to decay, and increased testing efforts raise awareness.


Fluoride is one of the greatest cons ever perpetrated on the American public. While some areas of the country can have high-levels of naturally occurring fluoride, the type that is added to about 90% of municipal water supplies are the silicofluorides, fluorosilicic acid (FSA) and sodium fluosilicate (NaFSA), by-products of the aluminum industry.


Done under the assertion that it helps prevent dental caries in underserved populations, this claim has been widely debunked in recent years. Authors of A Critical Review of the Physiological Effects of Ingested Fluoride, concluded that “Available evidence suggests that fluoride has a potential to cause major adverse human health problems, while having only a modest dental caries prevention effect.” These studies show that dental remineralization occurs when small amounts of fluoride are topically applied to teeth, not when ingested.


Although the medical establishment works hard to hide the dangers of fluoride, science is beginning to sound the alarm. In 2014, fluoride was added to a growing list of developmental neurotoxins, and the evidence of a link between ingested fluoride and the development of cancer is deepening.


What are some of the lesser-known but still frighteningly common contaminants being found in our drinking water? We’ve compiled five of the top reasons to find an alternative to tap water. (And no, single-step carbon filters don’t fix the problem.)


Why There Is No Such Thing As


1) Disinfectant By-products


Chemicals like chlorine, bromine, and iodine are in the class known as halogens (“salt-producing”), and are frequently used as industrial disinfectants. Water treatment facilities are dependent on them, especially chlorine, to kill harmful bacteria that is commonly present in public water systems.


Trihalomethanes, a class of chemicals that includes chloroform, are dangerous by-products of these treatment processes. Trihalomethanes have been linked to colon and rectal cancers, as well as birth defects, low birth weight and miscarriage.


Scientists suspect that trihalomethanes in drinking water may also be causing thousands of cases of bladder cancer every year. In a 2007 report, a startling 50% increase in bladder cancer risk was identified in a group of subjects who consumed water with trihalomethane concentrations higher than 21 parts per billion. The current EPA limit for total trihalomethanes in drinking water is 100 micrograms per liter, or 1 part per billion in water.


Shockingly, 600 disinfectant by-products that are known to cause harm to the human body have been identified in municipal tap water. Even more alarming is the fact that potentially harmful interactions between these chemicals are not reflected in any of the toxicology studies of individual chemicals.


While the water-treatment industry has sought alternatives to chlorination, initial efforts have not found safe alternatives. Until that time, treatment facilities will continue mixing these dangerous chemicals in the petri dish of our public water supply, until the cost to public health clearly outweighs the short-term benefits


2) Radionuclides


It’s hard to dispute that we live in an age of radioactive fallout. From the nuclear weapons tests of the last century, to the meltdowns at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima, highly toxic, radioactive elements called radionuclides have found their way into the environment, and inevitably, into our food supply.


Our water is not immune from these contaminants. The disaster at Fukushimaprompted the Japanese government to authorize the dumping of 777,000 tons of water tainted with tritium, the radioactive version of hydrogen, into the Pacific Ocean. This nuclear waste makes its way into the broader atmosphere via condensation of contaminated water, and eventually into groundwater supplies.


And it doesn’t take a meltdown to release this dangerous radiation into the environment. High levels of tritium have recently been found in the groundwater around the Miami, Florida nuclear complex at Turkey Point. Believed to be the result of seepage from underground cooling canals, these leaks are even more troubling due to their positioning between two national parks known for flourishing marine habitats, and their value to the public as recreation areas.


3) Pharmaceuticals


Scientists were alerted to something “fishy” going on in the Potomac River in the late 1990’s, when fish were found with both male and female sex organs. It was soon discovered that phytoestrogens in the water, likely from synthetic birth control pills, were affecting the hormones of these aquatic “canaries in the coal mine.”


This signaled a big wake-up call regarding the presence of pharmaceutical drugs in public water supplies.


Drugs are xenobiotics, treated by the body as foreign substances that must be eliminated. This means they don’t biodegrade well, and are often found persisting in the environment as pollutants. Not unlike pesticides, a wide range of pharmaceuticals can be found in minute but still significant quantities in environmental and municipal water samples, making second-hand pharmaceutical exposure a now-pervasive problem.


It is often argued that the concentrations of drugs showing up in municipal water supplies are so low as to render them insignificant. This is a dangerous brush-off, considering that most of these drugs are formulated to be effective at low doses. Furthermore, the long-term effects of these “accidental” exposures have never been tested, especially in combination with other chemicals.


While the EPA doesn’t want to “alarm the public”, a representative admits they “are concerned”, and have allocated funds to research this issue further.


4) Fluorosilicic Acid


Fluorosilicic acid is another dangerous waste product that has found its way into our drinking water. A by-product of the phosphate fertilizer industry, fluorosilicic acid is heavily contaminated with toxins and heavy metals (including arsenic, lead and cadmium), as well as radioactive materials.


And it doesn’t get into our water supply merely by groundwater leaching; it’s actively used in water treatment as an alternative to sodium fluoride in the government’s dangerous fluoridation campaign.


Fluorosilicic acid has been shown to contain the carcinogens arsenic and lead, and its high salt content leaches lead from water pipes. Fluorosilicic acid is so dangerous, the website PolyProcessing.com explains the difficulties of ensuring safe, industrial containment: “FSA interacts negatively with metals to produce a flammable hydrogen gas, meaning a stainless steel chemical storage tank is not a viable option. It attacks glass, eats through concrete, and poses a serious storage concern.…”


Not a pharmaceutical grade substance, even the EPA admits that the use of fluorosilicic acid (in the form hydrofluorosilicic acid) constitutes a practice akin to turning the public water supply systems of the United States into “hazardous waste disposal for these products.’


In 2013, concerned researchers petitioned the EPA to mandate a switch from using these industrial chemical waste products to fluoridate drinking water, to pharmaceutical-grade fluoride. Despite an estimated 100-fold decrease in risk of cancers, the EPA rejected the switch as being “too costly.”


5) Chemical pesticides


Groundwater provides the drinking water for more than half of the U.S. population, and is the source for most springs and wells that supply many rural homes. Just like the run-off in the bottom of your potted plant, when our nation’s farms and fields get watered, all the fertilizers, herbicides, and other chemicals used to treat them pass right through the soil, eventually leaching into groundwater supplies.


Knowing which substances are passing into your glass can be helpful for both monitoring and advocating tighter controls on agricultural practices that contribute many of these chemicals to the nation’s water table. These are just a few of the offenders that you don’t want in your glass!


DDT (Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane)


You may have heard that DDT, the insecticide made famous for its near-decimation of our nation’s bald eagle population, was banned from use in the 1970’s. So how can it still be a problem?


Thanks to a chemical phenomenon known as biopersistence, this widely-used chemical is still posing a cancer risk to Americans.


Biopersistent chemicals are resistant to break-down through metabolic processes. Once inside the body, these chemicals accumulate, often in fat cells and adipose tissue, where they can wreak long-term havoc on hormones, and overall health.


Another factor in this ongoing contamination is the fact that DDT remains legal for use in many countries. DDT molecules can travel vast distances in the atmosphere, leaving toxic soil in their wake.


DDT is acknowledged to be carcinogenic by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, as well as causing reproductive health issues and liver damage.


HCB (Hexachlorobenzene)


Originally used on cereal crops to prevent the growth of fungi, HCB is another dangerous chemical whose dark effects were brought to light in the 1970’s. Although use has been discontinued in the U.S., use worldwide has not been eliminated. HCB has been detected at measurable levels in air, water, soil, and food samples in the United States in recent years.


A by-product that is produced via numerous chemical processes, HCB ingestion is known to cause liver damage, neurological symptoms, and tainted breast milk. Large doses can be fatal.


To demonstrate HCB’s ability to biopersist, studies found that 30 years after acute exposure, breast milk of affected women still contained up to 150 times the allowable limit for consumption.


Dacthal® (DCPA, dimethyl tetrachloro terephthalate)


Dacthal is a popular herbicide used to control grasses and weeds. Unlike HBA and DDT, Dacthal is still legal for use in the United States, despite its growing fame as a dangerous ground water contaminant.


Dacthal first hit the radar as a chemical troublemaker around 1999, when the EPA launched large-scale monitoring of public water systems. Dacthal degradates were found in concentrations as high as 15% in several states, primarily where agriculture was prominent.


Dacthal bio-persists in adipose (fatty) tissue, and was found in animal studies to negatively impact multiple regions of the body, including liver, kidney, thyroid, and lungs.


A comprehensive groundwater study conducted by the Michigan Department of Community Health to gather toxicological data, determined that the herbicide Dacthal and its metabolites constituted a public health hazard.


For more information on tap water research, consult GreenMedInfo’s Tap Water Research database.


The Environmental Working Group’s Tap Water database allows you to search by state for relevant information about the safety of tap water in your area.


References


  1. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=34150#.WaSDtj6GOUk

  2. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/08/14/63-million-americans-exposed-unsafe-drinking-water/564278001/

  3. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/11/071120111526.htm

  4. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/lead/health.html

  5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956646/

  6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24719570/

  7. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(13)70278-3/abstract

  8. National Research Council (NRC) Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards.Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2006.

  9. NHDES. 2006. Trihalomethanes: Health Information Summary. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. Available: www.des.nh.gov [accessed January 2013]

  10. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15287390701459031

  11. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp6-c1.pdf

  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5865306_Occurrence_Genotoxicity_and_Carcinogenicity_of_Regulated_and_Emerging_Disinfection_By-Products_in_Drinking_Water_A_Review_and_Roadmap_for_Research

  13. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/07/14/national/science-health/tepco-says-decision-already-made-release-radioactive-low-toxic-tritium-sea-fishermen-irate/#.WaUTuz6GOUk

  14. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/23/us/nuclear-plant-leak-threatens-drinking-water-wells-in-florida.html?mcubz=1

  15. http://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/features/drugs-in-our-drinking-water

  16. http://blog.polyprocessing.com/blog/fsa

  17. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/tsca_21_petition_hfsa_2013-04-22.pdf

  18. https://www.livescience.com/38952-epa-arsenic-petition-response.html

  19. (Solley and others, 1993)

  20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistent,_bioaccumulative_and_toxic_substances

  21. http://www.cardnochemrisk.com/index.php?option=com_easyblog&view=entry&id=181&Itemid=2

  22. http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/extoxnet/carbaryl-dicrotophos/ddt-ext.html

  23. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/hexachlorobenzene.pdf

  24. https://www.nrdc.org/media/2001/010522

  25. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-09/documents/drinking_water_health_advisory_for_dacthal_and_dacthal_degradates_tpa_and_mtp.pdf

  26. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/ncap/pages/26/attachments/original/1428423346/dacthal.pdf?1428423346

  27. https://www.michigan.gov/documents/DacthalDiAcidHealthConsult_71729_7.pdf

© December 17, 2017 GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here http://www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.


The post Why There Is No Such Thing As ‘Safe’ Tap Water appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

Plastic Particles Found in Drinking Water

Plastic Particles Found in Drinking Water | water-glass | Environment General Health Special Interests Toxins


Dying due to plastic consumption seems an outrageous thought. But so was the idea that chemicals in plastic could change someone’s sexual orientation; until scientists proved it.


As explained in the link above, chemicals in plastic are responsible for countless diseases and, believe it or not, for the change in sexual orientation.


The effects that chemicals used in plastic have on animals have been proven without a doubt, and those same chemicals are ingested everyday by humans either in food, or drinking water.


As if plastic products shedding chemicals was not bad news, plastic microparticles are making their way into drinking water.


Plastic particles in water cleared for human consumption


We already knew that there were tiny fragments of this material that reached the seas, where they could be ingested by marine fauna and thus end up in the food that humans consume.


But now it turns out – perhaps more alarming – that a recent study has suggested that it is also common to find plastic particles or fibers in drinking water.


To what extent should we worry? The study was carried out by several university researchers, but instead of being reviewed by other researchers in a scientific journal, it was commissioned and published by a media company.


Of course, it is possible that many samples of drinking water contain plastic, given that it is a common material that often passes into the environment in the form of garbage as well as fibers from garments. made with artificial materials.


Surely the purifying treatments do not manage to eliminate the particles.


For example, sedimentation techniques consist of allowing the specks of clay, silt or organic matter to settle to the bottom of a purification tank.


Many plastic micro particles are less dense than water, so they float and can not be removed.


But what we also do not know is what happens with these micro fragments once they are in the intestine.


It could be that they passed through the body without being absorbed, just like the non-digestible fiber of the food.


However, the smaller they are, the more likely they are to reach the bloodstream and even the cells.


The study in question looked for plastic particles larger than 2.5 microns, which are about 10 times smaller than the cells that line the intestine.


Nano particles of 0.1 microns or less are more likely to penetrate cells, but we do not know if they are present in drinking water because the researchers did not look for them.


Artificial substances have been introduced into the human body for at least 400,000 years, when Palaeolithic cave dwellers inhaled the soot particles from the first bonfires that ignited in the cavities.


But there are many cases of corpuscles with harmful effects on health.


For example, clay specks cause podoconiosis, a form of elephantiasis, to around 1.5 million Africans.


As for the inhalation of asbestos particles, it is the cause of a very aggressive form of lung cancer.


We also have strong evidence that exposure to suspended particles is harmful, and that these corpuscles reach the bloodstream.


Researchers have found particles from combustion engines in human brains.


The harmful effects of water and air pollution


The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that every year there are more than six million deaths related to air pollution.


That is to say, there is a whole series of possible harmful effects for health that have to do with exposure to particles.


There is no conclusive evidence that the plastic micro particles discovered in the study on drinking water can reach the blood or that they are harmful to human health, but they have several potentially harmful effects.


As with other corpuscles, such as those found in air pollution, can cause inflammation, an immune response to any element that is recognized as “alien” to the body, which, in turn, can be harmful.


Another possible problem is that the plastic micro particles can become vehicles of entry of other toxins to the body.


In general, this class of microscopic fragments repel water and combine with insoluble toxins.


For example, they can be combined with compounds that contain toxic metals, such as mercury, and with organic pollutants such as some pesticides and the chemical known as dioxin, which we know causes cancer and reproductive and developmental problems.


If the micro particles are introduced into the body, the toxins can accumulate in the fatty tissues.


At present, we do not have unequivocal evidence that the microscopic fragments of plastic present in drinking water have harmful effects on health, but, since they may have other kinds of corpuscles, it is urgent that we improve our knowledge of what happens with micro particles of water. plastic in the body.


The post Plastic Particles Found in Drinking Water appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Thursday, September 28, 2017

The Plastic Inside You

The Plastic Inside You | tap-water-faucet | Environment General Health Sleuth Journal Special Interests Toxins


If you drink tap water, you’re probably drinking plastic fibers.


According to 10-month investigation conducted by journalists and scientists at Orb Media:


Microscopic plastic fibers are flowing out of taps from New York to New Delhi, according to exclusive research by Orb and a researcher at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health. From the halls of the U.S. Capitol to the shores of Lake Victoria in Uganda, women, children, men, and babies are consuming plastic with every glass of water.



The authors of “Invisibles: The Plastics Inside Us,” report that 83 percent of water samples collected across six continents contained plastic fibers. That means billions of people are drinking plastic-contaminated water.


From the report:


If plastic fibers are in your water, experts say they’re surely in your food as well—baby formula, pasta, soups, and sauces, whether from the kitchen or the grocery. Plastic fibers may leaven your pizza crust, and a forthcoming study says it’s likely in the craft beer you’ll drink to chase the pepperoni down.


It gets worse. Plastic is all but indestructible, meaning plastic waste doesn’t biodegrade; rather, it only breaks down into smaller pieces of itself, even down to particles in nanometer scale—one-one thousandth of one-one thousandth of a millimeter.


Microplastics have been shown to absorb toxic chemicals linked to cancer and other illnesses, and then release them when consumed by fish and mammals (that means you), says the report.


Read ‘Invisibles: The Plastics Inside Us’







Create your own review








Average rating:  

 0 reviews





Wednesday, September 13, 2017

13 Disorders Caused By Lack Of Water




13 Disorders Caused By Lack Of Water | water-splash | General Health


Most people don’t think they need to worry about dehydration. To them, dehydration is something that happens to travelers in the desert when they run out of water.


But there is a chronic form of dehydration that does not have the sudden and intense nature of the acute form.


Chronic dehydration is widespread in the present day and affects everyone who is not drinking enough liquid.



This list of 13 symptoms will inspire you to go get a glass of water, and then another, and another.


After each symptom the list below will show how lack of fluid affects the issue.


  1. Fatigue, Energy Loss: Dehydration of the tissues causes enzymatic activity to slow down.

  2. Premature Aging: The body of a newborn child is composed of 80 percent liquid, but this percentage declines to no more than 70 percent in an adult and continues to decline with age.

  3. Excess Weight and Obesity: We may overeat because we crave foods rich in water. Thirst is often confused with hunger.

  4. High and Low Blood Pressure: The body’s blood volume is not enough to completely fill the entire set of arteries, veins, and capillaries.

  5. Cholesterol: When dehydration causes too much liquid to be drained from inside the cells, the body tries to stop this loss by producing more cholesterol.

  6. Constipation: When chewed food enters the colon, it contains too much liquid to allow stools to form properly, and the wall of the colon reduces it. In chronic dehydration, the colon takes too much water to give to other parts of the body.

  7. Digestive Disorders: In chronic dehydration, the secretion of digestive juices is less.

  8. Gastritis, Stomach Ulcers: To protect its mucous membranes from being destroyed by the acidic digestive fluid it produces, the stomach secretes a layer of mucus.

  9. Respiratory Troubles: The mucous membranes of the respiratory region are slightly moist to protect the respiratory tract from substances that might be present in inhaled air.

  10. Acid-Alkaline Imbalance: Dehydration activates an enzymatic slowdown producing acidification.

  11. Eczema: Your body needs enough moisture to sweat 20 to 24 ounces of water, the amount necessary to dilute toxins so they do not irritate the skin.

  12. Cystitis, Urinary Infections: If toxins contained in urine are insufficiently diluted, they attack the urinary mucousmembranes.

  13. Rheumatism: Dehydration abnormally increases the concentration of toxins in the blood and cellular fluids, and the pains increase in proportion to the concentration of the toxins.

Recommended Daily Amount:


Every day you lose water through your breath, perspiration, urine and bowel movements. For your body to function properly, you must replenish its water supply by consuming beverages and foods that contain water.


So how much fluid does the average, healthy adult living in a temperate climate need?


The Institute of Medicine determined that an adequate intake (AI) for men is roughly 3 liters (about 13 cups) of total beverages a day. The AI for women is 2.2 liters (about 9 cups) of total beverages a day.







Create your own review








Average rating:  

 0 reviews









Saturday, August 19, 2017

"Colossal Fraud": Lawsuit Accuses Poland Spring Of Selling Groundwater

Ever wonder if that bottled mineral water you just spent several dollars on is really mineral water? According to a bombshell new lawsuit filed this week, at least in the case of one company it isn"t.


A group of bottled water drinkers has brought a class action lawsuit against Nestle, the company which owns Poland Spring, alleging that the Maine business has long deceived consumers by mislabeling common groundwater. The lawsuit was filed on Tuesday in a Connecticut federal court and accuses Nestle Waters North America Inc. of a “colossal fraud perpetrated against American consumers” the Bangor Daily News reports.


The plaintiffs claim that falsely labeling its "groundwater" product as pure spring water allowed Nestle to sell Poland Spring water at a premium; as a result the consumers who brought the legal action are seeking at least $5 million in monetary damages for a national class and several state subclasses. They requested a jury trial. The civil suit was brought by 11 people from the Northeast who collectively spent thousands of dollars on Poland Spring brand water in recent years. It seeks millions of dollars in damages for a nationwide class and hinges on whether the sources of Poland Spring water meet the Food and Drug Administration’s definition of a spring.


The 325-page lawsuit, which was filed by lawyers from four firms, claims that none of the company’s Maine water sources meets the federal definition for spring water and that the company has “politically compromised” state regulators. Rather than spring water, Nestle Waters is actually purifying and bottling groundwater, some of which comes from sites near waste and garbage dumps, the suit claims. The legal challenge comes as Nestle is looking to expand its operations in Maine.





For instance, the suit claims that the company’s wells in Poland, Maine, have never been scientifically proven to be connected to a spring and draw in surface water, which cannot legally be called spring water. It further alleges that the company has put water from some of these wells through a purification process that disqualifies it as spring water under federal regulations.



The suit makes similar claims about Poland Spring water sources in Hollis, Fryeburg, Denmark, Dallas Plantation, Pierce Pond Township and Kingfield.



Poland Spring has gotten away with this deception for years, the suit claims, by co-opting state regulators and interweaving its interests with those of state government. Since 1998 the company has generated millions of dollars for Maine through licensing agreements, and since 2003 it has had an executive on the governor-appointed body that oversees the state drinking-water regulation enforcement agency, the suit states.





The court complaint further says that the Maine Drinking Water Program scientist who approved many of the company’s spring water permits spent a decade working with this executive at a private engineering firm and that the agency failed to get independent proof of the springs’ existence.



In response to the lawsuit, a Nestle Waters spokesperson said that its water meets all relevant federal and state regulations on the classification and collection of spring water and that the suit is “an obvious attempt to manipulate the legal system for personal gain.”


“The claims made in the lawsuit are without merit. Poland Spring is 100 [percent] spring water.”


This is not the first time that Nestle Waters has faced such allegations. In 2003, it settled a class action lawsuit alleging that Poland Spring water doesn’t come from a spring. In that case, the company did not admit the allegation but agreed to pay about $10 million in discounts to consumers and charity contributions. In other words, pulling a page from Wall Street, it neither admitted, nor denied guilt.


The full lawsuit is below

Saturday, August 5, 2017

EWG: Most ‘Safe’ U.S. Tap Water Contaminated, Anything But Risk-Free

Your tap water might look crystal-clear, but there are a lot more contaminants floating around in there than you realize. An analysis of 28 million water records from nearly 500,000 American water utilities collected by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) reveals most Americans’ tap water contains contaminants at levels acceptable to the government, but may actually pose health risks to the people. [1]



The government doesn’t bother to impose requirements on hundreds of contaminants. Instead, health guidelines are issued by states and the federal government, but these are mere suggestions and goals. Amazingly, the guidelines are not enforceable by law. However, there is zero tolerance for the presence of any cancer-causing contaminant.

I went to the database and put in every zip code I’ve ever lived in – you can test your water here – and each one tested positive for higher-than-acceptable levels of at least 3 carcinogens, including chloroform. Yummy. The EWG found that tens of thousands of water utilities contain levels of cancer-causing contaminants. What’s more, every single zip code the group looked at turned up some form of contamination.



A senior analyst at EWG, Sonya Lunder said:



“We’re attempting to fill a huge gap here. I have not yet found any that have zero contaminants.” [2]



EWG President Ken Cook said on the group’s website:



“Americans deserve the fullest picture possible of what’s in their tap water. But they won’t get that information from the government or, in many cases, from their utilities. The only place they’ll find that is EWG’s drinking water report.”



Cook noted that even if the contaminants in a water system fall below federal guidelines, that doesn’t mean the water is safe. This is because it has been 20 years since the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) added a new contaminant to its list of regulated contaminants.


Since more than half of the contaminants found in U.S. tap water had no regulatory limit at all, the substances can be legally present even in high concentrations, and utilities must neither test for them nor inform residents about their presence.


Cook stated:



“Just because your tap water gets a passing grade from the government doesn’t always mean it’s safe. It’s time to stop basing environmental regulations on political or economic compromises, and instead listen to what scientists say about the long-term effects of toxic chemicals and empower Americans to protect themselves from pollutants even as they demand the protective action they deserve from government.”



Nneka Leiba, EWG’s Healthy Living Science Director, added:



“One of the challenges for us was to first, get across the message that ‘legal’ isn’t safe.


The legal limits that are set for drinking water often include political and economic compromises. They’re not purely based on health limits, so that’s part of the education process.” [3]


Example of contamination.

Findings from the Analysis


According to the EWG, contaminants detected in the country’s tap water included:


  • 93 linked to an increased risk of cancer. The presence of known or likely carcinogens exceeding established federal or state health guidelines were found in more than 4,000 water systems. The contaminants pose minimal but important health risks, but levels found in tap water are not legally enforceable.

  • 78 associated with brain and nervous system damage.

  • 64 linked to developmental problems in children or fetuses.

  • 45 tied to hormone disruption.

  • 38 that potentially cause fertility problems. [2]

Example of contamination.

Other concerning contaminants discovered by the analysis:


  • Chromium-6, a carcinogen with no federal regulations, was found in the drinking water supplies serving 250 million Americans in all 50 states. If the contaminant sounds familiar, it’s likely because it was made notorious by the film “Erin Brockovich.”

  • 1,4-Dioxane, an unregulated compound detected in tap water that supplies 8.5 million people in 27 states at levels above those the EPA considers to pose a minimal cancer risk.

  • Nitrate was detected in more than 1,800 water systems in 2015, serving 7 million people in 48 states above the level that research by the National Cancer Institute shows increases the risk of cancer – a level just half of the federal government’s legal limit for nitrate in drinking water. Nitrate is common in rural communities, where the chemical comes from animal waste and agricultural fertilizers.

If you want to know what contaminants are in your tap water, the EWG published the database online. Input your zip code and find out why everyone should have a water filtration system.


Sources:



[1] Quartz


[2] Environmental Working Group


[3] Gizmodo



Storable Food





About Mike Barrett:
Author Image
Mike is the co-founder, editor, and researcher behind Natural Society. Studying the work of top natural health activists, and writing special reports for top 10 alternative health websites, Mike has written hundreds of articles and pages on how to obtain optimum wellness through natural health.

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

15 Million Americans may be Drinking Water Contaminated with PFCs

More than 15 million Americans across 27 states may have drinking water contaminated with perfluorochemicals (PFCs) that are used to make non-stick cookware and other products, according to a report published in June 2017. [1]


PFCs have been linked to cancer, thyroid disease, and weakened immune systems. What’s more, prenatal exposure to the chemicals has been linked to low birthweight and future obesity. Even small amounts in drinking water are considered a public health threat.

Research by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and Northeastern University in Boston reveals that drinking water has been polluted with perfluorochemicals from more than 4 dozen industrial and military sources from Maine to California. [2]


In a press release, managing editor of the EWG Bill Walker said:


“It’s remarkable that the richest country on earth can’t guarantee its citizens that their drinking water is completely safe and has no long-term health implications.” [1]


Although the CDC has found perfluorocarbons in the bodies of virtually all Americans and knows that mothers can pass the chemicals to their babies through the umbilical cord, there are currently no federal health regulations for the chemicals in drinking water. [2]


The last time a drinking water contaminant was added to the EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act was 25 years ago. [1]



Two types of PFCs, called PFOA and PFOS, have waterproof and non-stick properties, making them used in the production of cookware, outdoor clothing, food packaging, and firefighting foam. DuPont formerly used the chemicals to make its Teflon non-stick cookware, and PFCs were formerly an ingredient in 3M’s Scotchgard.

Perfluorochemicals were phased out in the U.S. after it was revealed that both companies spent decades covering up the health risks of the substances. [2]


U.S. chemical manufacturers replaced PFOA and PFOS with a different type of PFC that is molecularly different. However, it was not adequately tested for safety before going on the market. The few studies that do exist indicate they’re not much safer than older PFCs.


EWG and the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute at Northeaster collaborated to create an interactive map that, EWG says, “combines federal drinking water data and information on all publicly documented cases of PFAS pollution from manufacturing plants, military air bases, civilian airports and fire training sites.”


Sources:


[1] Time


[2] Environmental Working Group



Storable Food


About Julie Fidler:


Author Image
Julie Fidler is a freelance writer, legal blogger, and the author of Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or the Absolute Worst. She lives in Pennsylvania with her husband and two ridiculously spoiled cats. She occasionally pontificates on her blog.

Thursday, July 27, 2017

America’s Tainted Water Supply: Study Warns Two-Thirds of the U.S. are Drinking Cancer Causing Chromium-6

America’s Tainted Water Supply: Study Warns Two-Thirds of the U.S. are Drinking Cancer Causing Chromium-6 | water-faucet | Environment Special Interests Toxins


The water crisis in Flint, Michigan isn’t the only water supply found sickening its citizens. Recently, more news articles are suggesting that multiple municipal water supplies are being investigated for health compromising chemicals and heavy metals.


It’s time to prepare for the worst-case scenario with this best-selling preparedness manual


TCP, a chemical that causes cancer, has been found in California water supplies and, after further investigation and test data compiled by an activist group show this chemical has been detected by utilities across the country. As well, on the other side of the country, towns in New York and New Jersey are both dealing with chromium-6 being found in their water. Some of you may remember that chromium-6 was the cancer causing metal featured in the movie “Erin Brockovich”. That said, New York and New Jersey are not the only states to have this issue. In fact, the highest levels ever recorded were in Norman (Oklahoma), Honolulu (Hawaii) and Riverside (California).” Source



In a 2016 study, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) released an analysis of more than 60,000 tap water tests conducted nationwide, finding that chromium-6, or hexavalent chromium, is in the tap water of more than 218 million Americans.


America’s Tainted Water Supply: Study Warns Two-Thirds of the U.S. are Drinking Cancer Causing Chromium-6 | map | Environment Special Interests Toxins Interactive map of chromium-6 in U.S. drinking water shows an estimated 218 million Americans served unsafe levels of the chemical. Environmental Protection Agency, UCMR-3


The study concluded that two-thirds of the U.S. are being served water with chromium-6 at, or above, the level that California state scientists consider safe.” Source



Despite the mounting evidence of chromium presence in drinking water and its harmful effects on human health, the problem has not been fully recognized by the state and federal regulatory bodies.


Moreover, if you think that solely drinking bottled water will protect you against chromium-6, think again. Rebecca Sutton, a senior scientist with the EWG and the lead author of a study conducted on carcinogens and harmful pollutants in water supplies stated, “Bottled water is not necessarily any safer than tap water,” said Sutton. “We just don’t have any guarantee that hexavalent chromium isn’t in that water.”


So how can you protect yourself? Sutton says your best bet is buying an effective water filter.


How to Effectively Remove 99.9% of Chromium-6 From Your Water


Until federal regulations are mandated for better drinking water, it is up to you to ensure your family is getting the purest form of water there is. This is one of the many reasons I am such an advocate for Berkey water filtration systems. This water filter is not only ideal to have in times of off grid emergencies, but can be used in everyday life as it removes this dangerous compound and other contaminants found in your water. According to the Berkey website the Black Berkey filter “will remove chromium-6 from tap water at levels greater than 99.9%.”


Don’t take my word for it? Let’s look at some Berkey Water Filter stats:


  • Black Berkey water filter removes chromium-6 from your water, as well as 203 other harmful contaminants including fluoride, heavy metals, pesticides, pharmaceutical drugs, and dangerous microorganisms.

  • Has a top of the line gravity fed filter that exceeds EPA NSF/ANSI standards for filtration.

  • The filter removes 95% of fluoride and arsenic!

  • Removes bacteria and parasites

  • Removes heavy metals like lead and mercury, VOCs (endocrine disruptors) and toxic chemicals like benzene and chlorine to levels higher than 99.99%

Check out the lab results here.


What I love the most is the simplicity and adaptability of using it in my everyday life, as well as in times of emergencies. A complete standalone system that can be setup in less than 10 minutes without any tools. You can have peace of mind with the Berkey water filter knowing that it is providing your family with safe drinking water. As well, it’s the most economical water purification system available as you can purify water for about two cents per gallon and it will last for years.


Hopefully, this article will prove that tainted water is widespread and it is up to you to ensure your family has quality drinking water.



Additional Resources:


https://www.epa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/chromium-drinking-water


http://www.bigberkeywaterfilters.com/blog/chromium/health-risks-of-chromium-6-in-drinking-water/


https://www.ecowatch.com/erin-brockovich-chemical-drinking-water-2010490185.html