Showing posts with label Startup company. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Startup company. Show all posts

Friday, September 1, 2017

There's Literally A 'Token' Called "Fuck" That's Up 370% In The Last 24 Hours

Authored by Simon Black via SovereignMan.com,


I vividly remember having a conversation several years ago with a woman about her real estate investments in the United States.


It must have been around 2005 or 2006… the peak of the property bubble.


She was a psychologist from somewhere in the midwest, telling me about how she was flipping off-plan condominiums in Florida.


Basically she would put money down to secure a condo unit in a building before it broke ground, then sell her contract to someone else at a higher price when the building was closer to completion.


I remember as she told me this story she was practically cackling at how quickly and easily she was doubling and tripling her money, and at one point said, “It is just soooo easy for me.”


Those words stuck.


I remember thinking, “Investing isn’t supposed to be easy. There’s supposed to be risk and hard work involved.”


But she wasn’t alone. Legions of amateur investors were piling into the market doing exactly the same thing.


Everyone seemed to be flipping condos. And everyone seemed to be making money.


It didn’t add up.


I remember one investor explaining to me how he would flip his condo contract to someone else when the building was 30% complete. Then that buyer would flip the contract to another investor when the building was 60% complete. Then another sale when the building was 80% complete, etc.





“But who is the person at the end of the line?” I asked. “Someone has to eventually live in all of these condos and be willing to pay the highest price.”



“Oh there will ALWAYS be plenty of people who will live here,” he told me.



To these investors it was a foregone conclusion that required zero analysis: there will always be buyers, no matter how high the price gets.


One of the marks of a good investor is learning from his/her mistakes; when an investment performs poorly, a good investor will try to figure out WHY, and incorporate those lessons into future decisions.


But a GREAT investor will learn from his/her successes.


This is rare. Perhaps it’s part of our human nature. When we succeed, we automatically conclude that we’re really smart.


We seldom examine what really happened. Did we get lucky? Were we riding the wave of a giant bubble? Or, perhaps our analysis was spot-on and we nailed it.


It’s hard to say for sure without some serious self-reflection.


But again, it’s in our nature to presume that we’re brilliant.


And that may be one of the most dangerous things of all… because our infatuation with our own brilliance causes us to do irrational things.


Instead of thinking, “Whew, I got really lucky, I’d better take some money off the table before this market crashes,” we think, “I’m so smart… now I’m going to double down and make even more money.”


It’s like gamblers at the craps table– people delude themselves into believing that they’re on a ‘hot streak’ and ‘can’t lose’, so they keep increasing their bets instead of cashing in their chips.


Eventually the luck runs out… and the money vanishes quickly.


I’m telling you all of this because I see the same thing right now in the “ICO” market.



If you haven’t heard of ICOs, it stands for Initial Coin Offering. It’s a combination of venture capital and cryptofinance.


Traditionally, startup companies have raised the money they’ve needed from angel investors and VC funds.


These days, companies are raising money by selling digital ‘tokens’ to investors, most of whom typically pay in Bitcoin, Ether, or some other cryptocurrency.


Tokens often represent shares in the startup company, just in the same way that Apple stock represents shares in Apple.


And, just like shares of Apple, investors can buy and sell their tokens in the market.


There are countless startup companies now issuing tokens. And, just like the price of the cryptocurrencies themselves, many ICOs have soared in price.


There’s a token issued by Stratis, for example, that is up 101,168% since its ICO last summer. The NXT token is up 672,989%.


Those are not type-o’s.


There’s another token that’s actually called “Fuck” which is up 370% in the last 24 hours.



The returns are absurd… especially considering the assets are priced in Ether or Bitcoin, which have also soared to all-time highs.


So on top of a 1,000% return in Bitcoin, ICO investors have also made a 100,000% return in the token.


But I’m hearing exactly the same cackling that I heard from the real estate bubble days more than a decade ago.


– It’s soooo easy to make money in ICOs.
– It’s a foregone conclusion that the tokens will go up in value.


Sorry, but it just doesn’t compute.


If the tokens represent ownership in a business, then the only thing that matters is whether or not the underlying business performs well.


Does the company have a compelling long-term strategic plan?


More importantly– are the managers successfully implementing the plan and achieving milestones?


Is the company on a path to financial sustainability?


Nobody seems to be paying attention to these details. They just buy tokens with the expectation that the price will rise.


And even if a business performs well, it’s ridiculous to think hat a startup company can be worth 100,000% more in a year. Or nearly 700,000% more in a couple of years.


To put these numbers in context, Peter Thiel invested $500,000 in Facebook back in 2004 as the company’s first big investor. In 2012 he sold most of it for $1 billion.


That’s a return of 200,000% in eight years… pretty tame by ICO standards.


Investing isn’t supposed to be easy, especially when speculating in startup companies. There’s supposed to be risk. Serious analysis. And lots of losers.


It’s not to say that there aren’t any good businesses issuing tokens. But it’s pretty clear this trend is a massive bubble.

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Signs That The Silicon Valley Tech Bubble Is About To Burst

18 months ago there was a seemingly limitless number of Silicon Valley future billionaires buying up multi-million dollar homes and renting out lavish pads.  But if demand for excessively priced real estate is any indication of the health of Silicon Valley"s tech industry then all the venture capitalists who have tripped over themselves to invest in the next "decacorn", or startups worth $10s of billions pre-IPO despite burning billions of cash quarterly, should be getting pretty worried right about now.


As the following chart from Zillow points out, home prices in San Francisco stalled about a year ago and rents have followed a similar path.


San Fran



But home prices aren"t the only thing stalling, according to a note from The Guardian, resumes are also starting to flood into Silicon Valley headhunters from recently unemployed software engineers who were let go after their companies failed to attract its required latest round of financing at a ridiculous valuation.





“We’re starting to get a lot of résumés from [software engineers at] companies where the business model isn’t working and they can’t get funding, so they are closing down or cutting back,” said Mark Dinan, a software recruiter based in the Bay Area, who keeps track of companies’ hirings and firings.



These startups are running out of money because VCs are being more discerning about where they place their money, making fewer, bigger bets.



“The number of investments [in the private market] has fallen by about a third, but the amount of capital is around the same,” said Tomasz Tunguz, a venture capitalist at Redpoint, adding that some of the “fast money” from hedge funds and mutual funds had shifted away from the sector.



“It’s been happening for a couple of years. It’s not as easy to raise capital and VCs are demanding better terms,” added Aswath Damodaran, a professor of finance at the Stern School of Business.



Despite the meteoric rise in the stock market over the past several years, venture capitalists have been forced to pull back on new investments partly because of a slowdown in companies going public. Last year was the slowest for US IPOs since the recession, with the amount raised by technology companies falling 60% from 2015.


Tech IPOs



Meanwhile, if SNAP"s IPO is any indicator of how other potential tech IPOs might be expected to perform, then we wouldn"t hold out hope for public investors to save the venture market from their valuation sins.


SNAP



But, a series of “down rounds” – when a company raises funds by selling shares that are valued lower than the last time they raised funds, leading its overall valuation to fall – may imply that there just isn"t a healthy backlog of companies that are IPO-worthy. CB Insights has tracked more than 100 of these down rounds and exits since 2015, including software company Zenefits, mobile app Foursquare and online music streaming service Rdio.





“It used to be that 95% of [investment] rounds were up, now 20% are down,” Tunguz said.



Then there are the so-called “decacorns” – unicorn startups valued at tens of billions of dollars – such as Airbnb, Uber and Palantir – which some believe are overvalued, but it’s hard to tell until they go public and are forced to reveal details of their underlying finances.



Ride-sharing app Uber, for example, has raised more than $16bn and is valued at more than $69bn. That’s more than automotive giants such as General Motors and Ford, despite the company losing $2.2bn last year.



“The interesting question with Uber is how long they can keep as a private company. They are raising capital like a public company without any of the disclosure and consequences of being a public company,” said Damodaran, who believes the company’s value is overinflated and it’s really worth $23bn.



So, how does this moment compare with the time leading up to the dotcom crash?  Here is the take of one Silicon Valley software recruiter:





“I got here in 97 and it was like it is now – incredibly packed, impossible to commute, high apartment costs,” Dinan said.



"We’re seeing overvalued companies, funded based on hopes and dreams and aspirations and not good business models. Companies counting users and eyeballs rather than profits. There are a lot of similarities.”



Another echo of the dotcom era is what Dinan calls “bad habits” such as the allegations of sexual harassment at Uber and human resources startup Zenefits cheating on mandatory compliance training.



“There was a lot of crazy behaviour in the late 1990s, including sexual harassment. It’s a result of there not being discipline,” Dinan said.



“The [dotcom crash] happened very suddenly and without any warning,” Damodaran said. “When it does happen everyone says they saw it coming. If you saw it coming then why didn’t you get out of it?”



Well, when all else fails there"s always the "negging" option to drive valuation...


Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Uber Has Too Much Debt For IPO (Video)

By EconMatters




We discuss Uber`s massive debt which we estimate around 4 to 4.5 Billion in aggregate, with a total capital raise of 11 Billion. The total debt number is astounding to say the least, but it is the rate of change of the debt number that is mindboggling. I don`t believe Uber has the Financials to go public, and investors risk losing everything at this rate of cash burn over the next three years. Uber may be the biggest high profile startup to file for bankruptcy before they make it to the IPO exit for the payoff for investors.


Uber has a spending problem, reminds me of Napster, quite a disruptor but not a profitable business model, flawed wasted energy, that becomes totally irrelevant and obsolete in five years anyway. Uber is essentially a glorified Ponzi scheme if you really get right down to the crux of the finances of this company. There are going to be sizable losses for all the investors valuing this company at a 62.5 Billion Valuation. That number will mean diddly squat in bankruptcy court!  



© EconMatters All Rights Reserved | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube | Email Digest | Kindle