Gun-Grabbers Off-Target on Threat of ISIS Call to Arms against Non-Muslim Americans

“Progressives” would have you believe the best way to deal with Islamic terorists on American soil is for citizens to disarm.

“The Islamic State militant group (ISIS) on Wednesday published a propaganda video that showed a one-legged fighter, purportedly American, ordering Muslims living in the United States to use the country’s flexible gun laws to carry out mass-casualty attacks,” Newsweek emphasized.

“Take advantage of the fact that you can easily obtain a rifle or a pistol in America,” the presumed traitor identified as Abu Salih al-Amriki urged. “Spray the kuffar [infidels] with bullets so that their fear of the Muslims rises, and they continue to reveal their hatred towards Islam.”

al-Amriki’s message is emphasized by a tactically-placed photo of semi-auto rifles for sale at a Las Vegas gun shop ( to evoke the Mandalay Bay shootings no doubt) and a confirming statement designed to spook the herd from Nicholas Rasmussen, outgoing director of the National Counterterrorism Center.

“We find ourselves in a more dangerous situation because our population of violent extremists has no difficulty gaining access to weapons that are quite lethal,” Rasmussen told The Washington Post.

Constitutionally-recognized freedom is the problem according to the Obama-appointed insider. It helps to consider that he’s a career policy wonk with a B.A. in social studies from private liberal arts college Wesleyan University, and a Masters in Public and International Affairs from the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton.

This isn’t the first time gun-grabbers have exploited jihadi threats against Americans.

Writing for the “progressive” Huffington Post in 2008, gun-hater John Rosenthal of Stop Handgun Violence cited a “How Can I Train Myself for Jihad?” manual titled, “How Can I Train Myself for Jihad” that “singles out the US for its easy availability of firearms and states that al-Qaeda members in the US can ‘obtain an assault weapon legally, preferably AK-47 or variations’.”

And in 2011, Media Matters and others were making great hay out of an ignorant video-taped call for jihad by Al Qaeda spokesman Adam Gadahn:

“America is absolutely awash with easily obtainable firearms. You can go down to a gun show at the local convention center and come away with a fully automatic assault rifle, without a background check, and most likely without having to show an identification card. So what are you waiting for?”

No you can’t, but you don’t expect the truth to get in the way of the totalitarian lobby agenda, do you?

Left unsaid is what this country is doing welcoming in those who mean to destroy it. Suggest that maybe we ought to hold things up until we can come up with safeguards and not only get accused of being a racist, a xenophobe and an Islamophobe, get ready for Obama-appointed federal judges to rule that  such precautions are “antithetical to American principles.”

Proving once more the truism that for “progressives,” every day is Opposite Day, what they don’t find antithetical are infringements on the right of the people to keep and bear arms.  Their solution…? Forget about the mission statement articulated in the Preamble about “insur[ing] domestic Tranquility, provid[ing] for the common defence … and secur[in]g the Blessings of Liberty,” and focus instead on eviscerating the one thing the Framers considered “necessary to the security of a free State.”

Instead the want to let our enemies in and disarm their countrymen.  There’s a plan.

—–

If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please make a donation to support our work.  You can donate HERE.

—–

David Codrea’s opinions are his own. See “Who speaks for Oath Keepers?”

 

 

The post Gun-Grabbers Off-Target on Threat of ISIS Call to Arms against Non-Muslim Americans appeared first on Oath Keepers.

Europe Is The Prime Example Of What Is Coming To The United States: “This Modern Invasion Makes Saladin’s Armies Pale In Comparison”

Normally this topic is covered “gingerly,” and with the 1^st Amendment of the Constitution having been “subverted” by political-social “correctness” doctrines, it is sure to draw unwanted attention. Europe is the prime example of what is coming to the United States. Countries such as Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, and France…the heart of Warrior-Crusader Europe in Medieval times…have absolutely kowtowed to what is nothing less than a Muslim invasion. This modern invasion makes Saladin’s armies pale in comparison.

The news is reporting the “giveaway” of traditionally Christian lands of European states to Muslim aliens crossing borders ceaselessly: on foot, by train, by plane, by car…by boat. This is a mass exodus in all directions, targeting all nations. Oligarchs such as Soros, and Politicos such as Merkel are fostering this exodus, backed up by the International Court of The Hague.

The socialist-progressives want to destroy the ethnic homogeneity and religion, language, and culture of these nations to usher in globalism with the goal of “railing in and controlling” the Islamist extremists later (an “organizing the organized” strategy of Alinsky).

It will backfire on them. The Islamists will come in and establish a foothold, and anyone that does not submit among the “unbelievers” (the al-Harb, as non-Muslims are called) will be dealt with. Dar al-Harb is the “house of war,” phonetically translated from the Arabic. Take note of a close similarity to dal al-Garb, or “house of the west.” The two are interchangeable, due to the philosophy/doctrine that holds for jihad, or “Holy War,” an institution of warfare meant to extend the rule of Islam into the dar-al-harb…into the lands of the gentile unbelievers.

Guess what? They’re doing it. America is beset from within by communists and socialists under the guise of “progressivism” who wish to completely destroy the borders, language, and culture of the United States. Their plan to use Alinsky’s “organizing the organized” and then deal with the Islamists later?

It is being used by the Islamists on them, in reverse.

Here is what they see: the proof of what is in the heart of the average man. I present to you a “heated discourse” between two individual commenters on Tess Pennington’s Ready Nutrition website. You can visit the comments section under the article How Natural Aids Can Lessen Your Chances of Contracting the Pneumonic Plague. Read this, between commenters “Raj” (the Islamist) and “Yoda Dunbar” (the Christian). The first comment (posted by Raj) was highly profane and “disguised/propped up” with intentional misspelling. We’ll skip it, and proceed to the important parts (complete with pictures):

Raj to Yoda Dunbar: “The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers.”  [Photo posted by Raj]

Yoda Dunbar to Raj:  “You can have all the mosques, etc you like we have the most High God, His Son and the Holy Ghost, we don’t need anymore than that

We pray for your soul to find true salvation, it won’t be granted by terror or intimidation, by pure repentance, get on your knees and ask for forgiveness and to repent, when you do that get back to me, there is more on salvation, you are not ready for the rest.”

Raj to Yoda Dunbar: “There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe – without swords, without guns, without conquests. The 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.”   [Photo posted by Raj]

Yoda Dunbar to Raj: “Guess you have forgotten the crusades, what is it with you people, the World is amazing, yet your kind seems hell bent on making it like it is where you came from, hell Holes, and that is why you are fleeing, instead of being grateful to a Nation for helping you and your kind out, you are angry, all the time too, why so angry? Compare your false entity, he calls for World domination, beheadings, raping little children and women, imposing taxes on those who won’t convert, slavery, the list is long of the abominable thoughts and wished of your entity, whereas our God, tells us to do nothing, he gave us free will, he wants us to love one another like brothers and sisters, he doesn’t want anyone raped, esp children, in the Bible he clearly says, suffer the little children to come unto me. You are on the wrong side of history and faith, let go of the past, stop threatening everyone, let alone getting so offended all the time. Thus ends my communication with you, I wish you well, and can only hope and pray you wake up to the truth before it is too late, there is no 72 virgins waiting, boy what a sales pitch to get ugly angry young Men to commit suicide bombings.”             

Raj to Yoda Dunbar: “It’s a conquest like never before. Conquest of Europe and Canada and then of USA and Australia. European and Canadian don’t need visa to go to USA and Australia. Europe and Canada will be a stepping stone to USA and Australia.”        

These comments are telling. You have each side telling the other about the superiority of its own side. The difference? The difference is plainly evident. Yoda Dunbar is simply didactic, whereas Raj mentions Islam but is telling Yoda Dunbar what the Islamists will do and what they are doing. He’s giving it to us!  By “us,” I mean Americans…exactly what they are doing and planning…with emphasis on the “doing” part! You’re not going to win a religious argument with those who not only believe in what they believe…but will strap dynamite to themselves and self-detonate…within the midst of the “prayer brunch” at the local Christian church.

True Believer by Eric Hoffer covers it all…for those on both sides believing in something more for the sake of establishing an “identity” for themselves and assuring a pulpit with which to peddle ignorance.

The only countries that are fighting the influx in Europe are Italy, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary, and they are under the siege of The Hague (the Court mentioned earlier), as well as having cretins within their own populations trying to destroy their nations from within, as with our nation. In the United States, there is a carefully-constructed policy of ensconcing all of the Islamist extremism and Sharia law into the schools, the universities, and local and state government. They are doing it, and not simply allowing it to happen. We are allowing it to happen, and should not be surprised to wake up one morning to find the United States in a battlefield from coast to coast.

The churches collect their tithes and percentages to fund an ongoing organization and keep everyone under control to the church hierarchies and whatever government is enabling their 501-C-3 tax status. The churches only interests are to preserve their establishments and enable tax-free salaries and profits under the “non-profit” shield. The churches buy property (such as abandoned movie theaters) and expand…not for religious growth, but for growth of the organization.

The Muslims buy property, too…and fill them with guns and train the youth in the Madrasas to hate the west and to die for Islam. 

The extremists can deny it all they want, but the bottom line is this: any land held by the Muslims and then lost to the “al-Harb” is considered a disgrace in the eyes of their Allah and must be retaken back. That applies not just to countries conquered, as in Spain and Portugal during the Middle Ages. That applies to places purchased…any piece of ground dwelt upon or with a mosque upon. Make no mistake: this is a war of conquest of a different kind.

The kind where the conquerors are “invited” in and are conquering lands held by those too blind to realize what is happening until it is too late.

This constitutes just one more threat, along with the fostered civil strife and political discord in the U.S. domestically. Next will most likely be the upholding of the “State of Aztlan,” and the “Reconquista” will be pushed to get the illegals from Central and South America and Mexico into the fray. Gutting the country from within and weakening it, and setting it up for the “Sunday Punch” of a foreign attack. The new emphasis: time for the media and the democrats to initiate the gun-grab…the firearms are the only thing stopping them. All on the march toward globalism.

---

Jeremiah Johnson is the Nom de plume of a retired Green Beret of the United States Army Special Forces (Airborne).  Mr. Johnson is also a Gunsmith, a Certified Master Herbalist, a Montana Master Food Preserver, and a graduate of the U.S. Army’s SERE school (Survival Evasion Resistance Escape).  He lives in a cabin in the mountains of Western Montana with his wife and three cats. You can follow Jeremiah’s regular writings at SHTFplan.com or contact him here.

This article may be republished or excerpted with proper attribution to the author and a link to www.SHTFplan.com.

Is A Tolerant Culture Being Replaced By An Intolerant One?

Authored by Saher Fares via The Gatestone Institute,

• One need not go back centuries to the Muslim conquest of the Christian late classical world -- the medieval Barbary corsair raids, the Ottoman yoke in Central and Eastern Europe or the slave markets of Kaffa in Tatar Muslim Crimea -- to understand that this violence clearly predates the European colonial era, the creation of the modern state of Israel, or the issue of climate change.


• Countries such as China, Nigeria or Kenya that are not Western, not "imperialist", not whatever the excuses that Islamists make, are still spectacularly attacked by similar stabbings. Month on month, there seems almost nowhere that Islamic terror did not strike.


• Volumes of revered Islamic texts establish in great detail the grounds of violence and oppression of non-believers and those deemed heretical. These supposed grounds -- made alive daily in madrassas and mosques across the world before being acted upon by religiously-trained terrorists -- are childishly dismissed by Western liberals as immaterial.


• The first step towards a solution is to question the received knowledge tirelessly dished out by media pundits in the West. What is lacking is simply seeing a huge body of evidence of theological justification for Islamist terror.

How thin can excuses wear every time an atrocity is committed in the name of Islam?

When 13 people were killed and scores more injured this week in a vehicle-ramming attack in Barcelona, Spain, and stabbing men shouting "This is for Allah!" on London Bridge and in Borough Market in June, what the victims least cared about was the Western elite pontificating that the latest atrocity "had nothing to do with Islam".

British Prime Minister Theresa May said, "It is time to say enough is enough" and promised a review of her country"s counter-terrorism strategy.

In the absence, however, of an honest and tempered look at the root causes of this terrorism, sacred or not, and a painful soul-searching by Muslims themselves of the grounds in their religion that give rise to such violence, it will never be "enough".

On June 4, British PM Theresa May said, "It is time to say enough is enough" and promised a review of her country"s counter-terrorism strategy. In the absence, however, of an honest look at the root causes of this terrorism, and a painful soul-searching by Muslims of the grounds in their religion that give rise to such violence, it will never be "enough". (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

One need not go back centuries to the Muslim conquest of the Christian late classical world -- the medieval Barbary corsair raids, the Ottoman yoke in Central and Eastern Europe or the slave markets of Kaffa in Tatar Muslim Crimea -- to understand that this violence clearly predates the European colonial era, the creation of the modern state of Israel, or the issue of climate change.

Only a fortnight ago, 29 Christian Copts were killed for refusing to say, "There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is his prophet" while on a trip to an Egyptian monastery on May 26. Separately, an unconfirmed number of Christians were killed and taken hostage by a mix of Saudi, Pakistani, Chechen, Moroccan and local jihadists in the southern Philippines during the past few weeks. In addition, 90 people were killed in a bombing in Kabul on May 31, and 26 people were killed at an ice cream parlor in Baghdad during Ramadan. None of these massacres had anything to do with "Bush"s war" in Iraq or U.S. President Donald J. Trump"s proposed "Muslim ban".

Countries such as China, Nigeria or Kenya that are not Western, not "imperialist", not whatever the excuses that Islamists make, are still spectacularly attacked by similar stabbings. Month on month, there seems almost nowhere Islamic terror did not strike. In January 2014, there the kidnapping and forced conversion of Christian Chibok girls by Boko Haram in Nigeria. In March 2014, there were stabbings at China"s Kunming Railway Station in by eight terrorists of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement -- male and female attackers pulled out long-bladed knives and stabbed and slashed passengers. In May 2014, there was the shooting at the Jewish Museum in Brussels. In June 2014, there was the murder of 48 people in Mpeketoni in Kenya, and the list goes on for just the first half of 2014 alone.

The slaughter at London"s Parliament Square; the Manchester Arena; the St. Petersburg Metro; Paris"s Bataclan Theater and sports stadium; the three bombings targeting travelers in Brussels; last Christmas"s truck-ramming attack on a packed festival market in Berlin, to name but a few of the further incidents -- all really had nothing to do with avenging the Congolese from the onerous legacy of King Leopold.

Rather, volumes of revered Islamic texts establish in great detail the grounds of violence and oppression of non-believers and those deemed heretical. These supposed grounds -- made alive daily in madrassas and mosques across the world before being acted upon by religiously trained terrorists -- are childishly dismissed by Western liberals as immaterial.

Meanwhile, men, women and children are being offered as human sacrifices on the altar of political cynicism. Divine justice will doubtlessly judge not only the murderers and a creed that often seems bloodthirsty, but also those who insist, against all evidence, that this creed has nothing to do with those deaths.

The first step towards a solution is to question the received knowledge tirelessly dished out by media pundits in the West, and confirmed by too many supposed Muslim "moderates" both at home and abroad. What is lacking is simply seeing a huge body of evidence of theological justification for Islamist terror.

Have the statements by politicians in the 1990s (for example, at the time of Sheikh Omar Abdul-Rahman"s plot against the World Trade Center) changed from those uttered in the wake of 9/11, or again from those repeated after the San Bernardino attack in 2015? Do politicians give their "Islam is a religion of peace" platitudes out of political expediency or even the slightest knowledge of the ideology of Islam? Do they know actually know more about Islam than many of Islam"s learned ulema (scholars), including Ibn Taymiyyah, or the authentic hadith (actions and sayings of Muhammad)? One says:

"Allah"s Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror."" (Sahih Al-Bukhari 122)

How does one read verses in the Quran such as:

"I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers. Smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them. This is because they contended against Allah and His Messenger. If any contend against Allah and His Messenger, Allah is strict in punishment." (8:12-13)?

When it is said that Islam has nothing to do with verses such as these, is that meant to appease Muslims, comfort the victims of Islamic terror or support the comfort of the non-Muslim community? If it is the first, well, as history teaches, appeasement simply does not work. Besides, it would be an offensive to presume that Muslims, all Muslims, are to be held responsible for a creed that, in their own understanding of it, greatly varies from one individual to another. If the denial is intended to comfort victims, it does not. And as for the comfort of the non-Muslim community, what is being served up has to be based on what is visibly true. Should such arguments not first be pitched to try to convince those who are willing to kill and be killed in the name of Islam, rather than to those out to have a good time on a Saturday evening?

Will the time come when reformers in the Islamic world will have louder voices in scrutinizing Islam -- despite the obvious dangers to their lives -- than Western elites, who are merely afraid of being falsely accused of being "Islamophobes"? Why should it be "Islamophobic" to want to defend yourself?

For nearly two years, a prime-time TV program by a young Egyptian reformist, Islam el-Beheiry, has called for an overhaul of the millennium-old compilation of hadiths. He argues that much of it is incompatible with modernity and the best understanding of divinity and prophethood:

"Such tradition has very little good amid a multitude of evil, least of which is the insistence by all the Four Schools of Sunni Islam that Christians can be killed with impunity. A Muslim life is "superior" to that of a non-Muslim. Such is the Ijmaa" (jurisprudence consensus)."

Beheiry was sentenced in May 2015 to five years in prison with hard labor for "defamation of religion" -- thanks to Egypt"s blasphemy law. The sentence was reduced in December 2015 to one year. After serving most of his sentence, he was released on a presidential pardon.

Still, this Ramadan 2017, Beheiry was back again on the screen with a program he calls "The Map", in which he is trying to build a scientific way of judging what he thinks is divine and what is not in the mass of Islamic literature.

Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi, an army general who in 2014 came to power following vast street protests against the short-lived rule of the Muslim Brotherhood, said it was no longer feasible that the Muslim World would set itself "in enmity against the whole world".

Now, in Europe, some rightly ask: If one in a thousand is a bad apple, why should we judge all the apples. One also needs to ask: If one in a thousand apple blows up in my yard, how many more violent incidents will Europe get after bringing in a cartload of millions more? Or, what if the problem is not really with the fruit, but with the tree itself?

Why is a desire to preserve one"s own culture deemed racist? I do not believe that I am better because I am or am not a Muslim. Is it "xenophobic" to ask such questions when the violence keeps edging closer and closer to home? Why should it be "Islamophobic" to want to defend yourself?

I do not fear Muslims, but I fear that a tolerant culture is being replaced by an intolerant, misogynistic, anti-Semitic and supremacist one -- espoused, even semi-consciously, by much of the Islamic world today. It is a world that is being assured by its scholars that such intolerant, misogynistic, anti-Semitic and supremacist manifestations are, in all ages, in the best spirit of Islam.

Is it "Islamophobic" to be angry at such atrocities committed every day, or to be angry at politicians who lie about what Islam is and is not, and merely call their challengers names while failing to do anything to stop the atrocities?

Should European courts and parliaments criminalize free speech that criticizes this understanding of Islam among the bulk of Islamic jurists, when those jurists stand at the head of an assembly-line of suicide bombers targeting Western nationals?

Should those who ask questions about Islamic terror be ostracized by the mainstream media and academia, while those institutions themselves give no answers to the jihadist problem of "holy hate" in our midst?

I do not wish the world to turn against Muslims. I only wish the sages would stop and think if all this really has "nothing to do with Islam." Can we not say, "stop justifying murderers in the name of your religion"?

Can we not simply say that such creeds will not be allowed here in the West, will not be whitewashed, glossed over, or explained away by Westerners through a mixture of cultural cringe and a misguided sense of guilt? Can we not reject jihad, accept apostasy, and be able freely to ask questions in our public spaces, on our television shows, in our schools and on our streets?

Women's March Organizer Calls For Jihad Against "Fascists Reigning In The White House"

Authored by Daniel Lang via SHTFplan.com,

The far-left and radical Islam have made strange bedfellows in recent years. You would think that they’d be completely in opposition to each other, given how different their values are, but the far-left is shockingly tolerant of radical Islam. They’ll rail against what they think is an injustice in their own society, like the patriarchy, the wage gap, or rape culture in the West (all of which are provably false). But they’ll turn a blind eye to radical Islam, which is an actual patriarchy that treats women like chattel, routinely executes gays, and punishes women when they’re raped.

No one embodies this cognitive dissonance more than Linda Sarsour. She was one of the lead organizers of the Women’s March earlier this year, and has since become a rising start among the left. But despite her progressive credentials, she also frequently expresses support for sharia law, and has been known to work with convicted terrorists.

She claims to be an advocate for peace, but some of her statements would suggest otherwise. Last weekend she gave a speech at the Islamic Society of North America Convention, and called for “jihad” against the Trump administration.

“I hope that we when we stand up to those who oppress our communities that Allah accepts from us that as a form of jihad. That we are struggling against tyrants and rulers not only abroad in the Middle East or in the other side of the world, but here in these United States of America where you have fascists and white supremacists and Islamophobes reigning in the White House,” Sarsour said.

“Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our community, it is not to assimilate and please any other people and authority,” she said. “Our obligation is to our young people, is to our women, to make sure our women are protected in our community.”

“Our top priority and even higher than all those other priorities is to please Allah and only Allah,” Sarsour declared.

You can see the speech for yourself below.

Sarsour is emblematic of a trend that we’re seeing on the left these days. They’re becoming attached at the hip with radical Islam, despite the fact that these ideologies don’t seem to have anything in common.

Though these belief systems are very different, they do have a common enemy. What the left and radical Islam share is a hatred for Western civilization and values (hence her call to refuse any form of assimilation). Perhaps they aren’t such strange bedfellows after all.

Government-Funded Martyrs? ISIS Suicide Bomber “Paid $1.24 Million to Blow Himself Up”

It may well be that the West is inadvertently fueling its own demise.

In a turn of bizarre and tragic events, a man who was released from Guantanamo Bay with the help of British legal aid has now killed himself in a suicide bombing that targeted a military facility in Iraq.

The UK-born citizen was compensated handsomely for his time in the notorious prison for terrorists, only to turn around and return to Syria and Iraq to wage jihad.

via the Daily Mail:

A British ISIS suicide bomber has been revealed as a former Guantanamo prisoner who was handed £1million in taxpayers’ money as compensation before fleeing to Syria.

UK national Jamal Udeen al-Harith was photographed moments before blowing himself up in an attack on a military facility near Mosul in Iraq.

The Muslim convert – who changed his name from Ronald Fiddler in 1994 – was sent to Guantanamo Bay in 2002 after he was caught by American forces in Afghanistan.

al-Harith/Fiddler was released a couple of years later, and sued the government for monetary damages after making the case that he was misidentified as a terrorist, and mistreated during captivity.

But ironically, and due to a lapse of securtiy, he returned to the terrorism fight after being reintegrated into to normal life in British society.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents knew or were complicit in his mistreatment and was handed £1million to stay silent.

… [D]espite security services being fully aware of his previous detention, al-Harith, who worked as a web designer for a time, was able to escape the UK in 2014 to fight with ISIS in Syria, leading to his eventual death.

[…]

His journey was revealed following an escape from ISIS-controlled Syria in 2015 by British mother Shukee Begum and her five children.

Somehow, it is as if the West is chasing – and biting – its own tail in the Middle East, eating up all gains that is has won, and ensuring that a cycle of perpetual violence, war and turmoil will continue in the region.

How did things get so twisted that the UK, or U.S. or any other “friendly” country could be funding its own enemies, funding terrorism and sowing the seeds of destruction?

Read more:

As Terror Attacks Hit Home, U.S. Caught “Bombing Syria to Aid ISIS”

Homeland Security “Concerned About Security Breach” From ISIS As Refugees Prepare to Flood America

New Patch for U.S. Troops Fighting ISIS… Looks Like ISIS Logo

US Complains As Putin Bombs its Terrorists: “ISIS Is An Intentional Creation of U.S.”

ISIS Fires American-Made Missiles At Syrian Army: “U.S. Funding, Arming ISIS From the Beginning”

Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.

Please Spread The Word And Share This Post

Author: Mac Slavo
Views: Read by 28 people
Date: February 22nd, 2017
Website: www.SHTFplan.com

Copyright Information: Copyright SHTFplan and Mac Slavo. This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.shtfplan.com. Please contact us for permission to reproduce this content in other media formats.