Showing posts with label Computer vision. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Computer vision. Show all posts

Monday, December 25, 2017

"My Eyes Popped Out Of My Head": Ohio Woman Receives $284 Billion Electric Bill

The ‘Nightmare Before Christmas’ has nothing on this.


Due to a processing error made by her local power company, one Ohio woman discovered earlier this month – to her abject horror – that she owed Penelec, her power provider, $284 billion, a figure that’s larger than the combined national debts of Hungary and South Africa.


According to The Eerie Times News, Mary Horomanski discovered the error while she was checking her bill online. Initially, she wondered if the hefty charge was due to her Christmas decorations.


“My eyes just about popped out of my head,” said Horomanski, 58. “We had put up Christmas lights and I wondered if we had put them up wrong."


There was, of course, one small silver lining: According to her bill, Horomanski didn’t have to pay the entire $284,460,000 sum until November 2018. Her minimum payment for December was a relatively paltry $28,156. And Penelec hadn’t turned off her electricity – yet.



Fortunately for Horomanski, the issue was quickly resolved when she texted her son, who contacted the power company and told them about the bill. They confirmed that the sum was an error, and that Horomanski owed much, much less. Her online statement was quickly fixed to the correct amount: $284.46.


A spokesman for the power company said he doesn’t know how the error occurred but that it was obviously the result of somebody accidentally moving a decimal point nine digits to the right.


“I can’t recall ever seeing a bill for billions of dollars,” Durbin said. “We appreciate the customer’s willingness to reach out to us about the mistake."


The incident, Horomanski said, prompted her to ask for a different gift from her son this year.


“I told him I want a heart monitor,” she said.


And with that, the Horomanski’s Christmas was saved.  
 









Friday, December 1, 2017

Surveillance State: Stanford Researchers Use AI To Determine Neighborhood"s Bias By Its Cars

A team of researchers at Stanford University have trained artificial intelligence algorithms to observe and study millions of images on Google Street View to determine how people vote by the make of their car. The algorithms were trained to recognize the make, model, and year of every car produced since 1990, in more than 50 million Google Street View images across 200 American cities.



The data on car types and location were then compared against the most comprehensive demographic database in use today, the American Community Survey, and against presidential election voting data to estimate demographic factors such as race, education, income and voter preferences, the Stanford News reported.


Fei-Fei Li, an associate professor of computer science at Stanford and director of the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab, led the team of researchers who published the study on Tuesday in the official journal of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, and found a “simple linear relationship” between cars, demographics and political persuasion.


Li is an expert in computer vision and deep learning, a form of artificial intelligence in which she teaches algorithms to “recognize three-dimensional objects in two-dimensional images”. The algorithms were trained, but more importantly, they became self-aware combing through millions of images on Google Street View in identifying the political preference of a citizen through the car they owned.


“Using easily obtainable visual data, we can learn so much about our communities, on par with some information that takes billions of dollars to obtain via census surveys. More importantly, this research opens up more possibilities of virtually continuous study of our society using sometimes cheaply available visual data,” Li said.


According to the study: "If the number of sedans in a neighborhood is greater than the number of pickups, there is an 88 percent chance that the precinct will vote Democratic. Transpose those numbers to have more pickups than sedans and there is an 82 percent chance a precinct will vote Republican.  



The algorithms worked day and night for two weeks and were able to probe through 50 million images creating 2,657 categories by make, model, and year. Standford News said that “a human working at a relatively high rate of six images a minute would need 15 years to complete the same task”.


Researchers believe their algorithm could be an inexpensive real time solution to the more costly demographic surveys. For example, the American Community Survey costs the U.S. more than $250 million per year a lag time between data collection and publication that could span 2-years. Li’s algorithm is a hopeful to replace the current surveys.


Not so fast, however said Timnit Gebru, first author of the paper and formerly a member of Li’s lab, who does not “see something like this replacing the American Community Survey, but as a supplement to keep the data up to date.” Gebru has high hopes for the technology of extracting critical information in the world around us on inexpensive platforms such as Google Street View.


“If you walk around a neighborhood looking at cars, the density of traffic sometimes tells you things as valuable as the types of cars you see on the streets. We can use all this information in our algorithms,” Gebru said. Li agreed, counterting that “It can help us understand how our society works, the things people need and how we can improve lives,” Li said. “There is great potential to use computer vision technology in a constructive and benevolent way.”


And while AI algos at an elite academic institution are mapping out the political preferences of each American by location, with what one hopes are ultimately benign intentions, one wonders what would happen if the data fell into the wrong hands, or if - gasp - the "election manipulating" Russians were to do a similar analysis using entirely publicly available data? Would America"s next president be an organgutan?









Saturday, October 21, 2017

Marc Faber Responds To Racism Accusations

Having been forced off the boards of Sprott, NovaGold, and Ivanhoe mines and excommunicated from mainstream business media following his comments earlier in the week, Gloom, Boom, & Doom Report writer Marc Faber responds to his racism allegations...


"I have been labeled by the mainstream media as a racist - I don"t think this corresponds at all with reality.


 


I wrote a report about capitalism and socialism and about private property rights, and I also wrote about the tendency nowadays to want to rewrite history.


 


In the US they are trying to tear down statues of people who had a different view from other people at the time... they also tried to tear down statues of Columbus..


 


I think that when you have civilization, when you have culture, you should remember your past.


 


Our past - the white man - has certainly not been glorious, it"s been very cruel with the periods of imperialism and colonialism being very cruel.


 


But the fact is that the white man and the Europeans brought a lot of skills and knowledge and a work ethic that built a very prosperous society... until very recently.


 


I think that to try to deny the fact that the western white man made America great is just not right and for that reason I was attacked very badly."



The conversation then continues to discuss cultural clashes, skin color, religion, confederate statues, African repression, capitalism, gold, bitcoin, Hillary Clinton, the swamp, President Trump, and America"s military-industrial complex running foreign policy.



We suspect Faber"s reponse will do him no favors in this age of ever-increasing virtue-signaling, but he has at least clarified his perspective.









Saturday, October 7, 2017

White House Says Trump's "Calm Before The Storm" Comment Is "Extremely Serious"

Following President Trump"s "calm before the storm" comments last night, reporters tried to ask him once again what he meant today, to which he responded "you"ll see." However, during The White House Press Briefing, Sarah Sanders replied to questions suggesting the President"s comments were "extremely serious," however without offering an explanation.




When asked if Trump was referring to military action when he said "calm before the storm." Sarah Sanders replied "We"re never going to say in advance what the president"s going to do. You"ll have to wait and see." 


Then, in a follow up question "how seriously should America"s public or America"s adversaries take these comments", the White House press secretary said "I think you can take the president protecting the American people always extremely seriously. He"s been very clear that that"s his number one priority."



Earlier in the day, Trump continued the cryptic mystery: shortly after signing a manufacturing executive order, a reporter asked what he meant when he said that a gathering of military leaders at the White House the evening before was "the calm before the storm," U.S. President Donald Trump did not elaborate, and said again, "You"ll find out."


And then he winked.


Sunday, October 1, 2017

Make BaSKeTBaLL GReaT AGaiN!

Seems like their usual M.O. of assisting communism isn"t working as well as it has in the past. Hitting them where it hurts, in their coin purse, is the only way for the average Joe to fight back. Well, besides a counter revolution, which I"m pretty sure they wouldn"t mind as long as they could jet on out of country before their neck is put into a noose.

Tuesday, September 26, 2017

NFL Posts Job Ad For "Crisis Communications Strategist" To Advise League Executives

As the NFL"s feud with President Trump continues to dominate headlines, a feud which has effectively turned ESPN into a politically-themed talk show, the league has decided to recruit additional talent to "provide crisis communications counsel to leagues executives."  Per a job listing posted to Daybook, the NFL says they"re looking for a "Senior Communications Strategist" to be based out of New York City who can assist with "crisis communications" and "devise a strategy and long term vision to strategically position the NFL in the sports marketplace."  Here are some highlights:





Responsibilities:



The senior communications strategist will be responsible for proactively developing plans and strategies aimed at publicly positioning the NFL to key audiences through all communication channels, both traditional and emerging media. They will work closely with communications department leadership to create messaging to reflect the league"s wide variety of priorities and expedite organizational decision-making.



Additionally, the strategist will:


  •  Provide crisis communications counsel to leagues executives.

  • Devise strategy and long term vision to strategically position the NFL in the sports marketplace.

  • Provide guidance to senior leadership, including executive vice presidents and COO to achieve desired reputational results and develop metrics to measure success.


NFL



So, what kind of skills are required for such a position?  Well, you"ll need to be an "expert" in "storytelling" and you"ll need to be "comfortable working in a diverse environment"...so, no Trump-supporting racists allowed, please.





Required Education and Experience:


  •  Bachelor"s degree in related field and a minimum of 8+ years of experience in communications or journalism with expertise in storytelling, issue management and long term planning

  • Successfully demonstrated ability to lead, participate in, and support cross-departmental activities.

  • Strong written and verbal communications skills, excellent organizational skills and strong interpersonal skills.

  • Excellent working knowledge of the PR field including documented experience working in public, fast paced, high-pressure situations.

Other Key Attributes / Characteristics:


  • Strategic Leader: The successful candidate will think and act strategically as a valued member of the communications department and other NFL units.

  • Trusted Advisor: He/she will serve as a credible PR resource to clubs and league executives

  • An individual with intense and dedicated work habits. Someone who takes initiative, speaks his/her mind, and sets high standards in all he/she does.

  • An individual comfortable working in a diverse environment

  • A creative, imaginative individual who has the business acumen, curiosity and ability to define innovative strategy and deliver against it.

  • A person with the highest moral and ethical standards, who can be relied upon to always act in the best long-term interests of the League.

  • A person with the capacity to be a hands-on, sleeves-up team player.

  • Superior judgement and communication skills, as well as political sensitivity both internally and externally

  • Experience in corporate communications, sports or entertainment is preferred.


Of course, rather than prepare for a political war the NFL could also just play football...just a thought.