Yes, The Purge Is Real

Here is another video talking about the censorship by YouTube, from X22 Report.

The post Yes, The Purge Is Real appeared first on Oath Keepers.

THIS IS THE FACE OF EVIL

The following video comes from SGTReport.

From the video description:

Today You Tube PURGED the Richie From Boston channel. He HAD 150,000 subscribers. You Tube also terminated the Jordan Sather channel. The fascist “Winston Smiths” at You Tube are now targeting investigative journalist Jerome Corsi too. Is this discrimination of political speech legal? I guess it doesn’t matter if you’re an entity under the Google umbrella. Just ask former Google engineer and truth teller James Damore. Questioning the Florida shooting seems to be the common theme that brought these channels down. So in the spirit of stupidity and what ought to be a FREE PRESS, I’m going there too.

YouTube is censoring conservative and non-MSM outlets.

The post THIS IS THE FACE OF EVIL appeared first on Oath Keepers.

False Flag? UN Report: North Korea Sent Syria Chemical Weapons

A leaked United Nations report is claiming that the rogue regime of North Korea sent chemical weapons to Syria. According to the report, 40 items used in chemical warfare and ballistic missiles in the war-torn nation of Syria were sent by North Korea.

It is important to recognize first, that this report was leaked. So far, it isn’t clear who let the information get out, but it could be used as a justification for the United States to get itself deep into another war, and therefore, it’s validity should be questioned.

History does repeat itself; if not identically, then in identical circumstances and events in different nations. History also does not just “happen,” as there are powerful forces at work in every nation. False flags have been used throughout human history: politicians and oligarchs initiate them to follow a hidden agenda. Too often the masses become the “True Believer” of Eric Hoffer. Worked up into a patriotic frenzy, they charge into the fray…little understanding that the great war or the great crusade is orchestrated by smiling bankers and nabobs, securely “in the rear with the gear,” sending men out to die to attain their secret objectives.

In this vein, consider that the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) is not limited to American White Anglo-Saxon Protestants of the United States, but a “conglomerate” of independent nations with the ability to wage war, sustain it, and sell arms. Each independent nation has their own “MIC” but they freely exchange goods and services (what we call arms and “negotiated” conflicts). They march to their own beat but allow themselves to be “guided” by the politicians, the oligarchs (who may or may not actively own industries in the MIC), and the bankers. –SHTFPlan

According to The Guardian, the UN panel of experts monitoring sanctions against North Korea said its investigations into Pyongyang’s transfer of prohibited ballistic missile, conventional arms, and dual-use goods found the previously unreported shipments. It said an unnamed UN member state also reported evidence that Myanmar received a range of conventional weapons from North Korea including multiple rocket launchers and surface-to-air missiles in addition to ballistic missile systems. North Korea’s Ryonhap-2 corporation was involved in a 2008 Syrian ballistic missile program, the report said.

The US is not alone in its accusations that Syria used chemical weapons against its own people. The more than 200-page report to the UN security council, which diplomats expect to be made public in mid-March, details “substantial new evidence” about North Korea’s dealings with Syria, dating back to 2008.

Other information coming from yet another unidentified member state claimed that North Korean technicians “continue to operate at chemical weapons and missile facilities at Barzeh, Adra, and Hama”, the report said. It quoted Syria’s reply to the panel about the reports: “There are no [North Korean] technical companies in Syria and the only presence of some [North Korean] individuals are confined in the field of sports under private individual contracts for training athletics and gymnastics.”

SHTFPlan warned of the potential for a false flag, such as this might be, back on February 15:

The underlying points toward a potential false flag being initiated via the hostilities between Israel, Iran, and Syria.  At the bare minimum, it will generate increased troop deployments and increased military budget expenditures across the board. It may also divert attention away from corruption charges in Israel, continuing ridiculous (and baseless…Democrat-created) accusations of Russian campaign meddling and the administration’s (alleged) campaign monies paid to a porn star. War is the perfect solution because the average citizen has no recourse against the State…because the State answers to no one and not even itself. –SHTFPlan

For all intents and purposes, and directly on the surface, this immediately looks like a false flag. It will be difficult to tell because the only thing we have is the “word” of mainstream media outlets and the United Nations, which should immediately raise all kinds of red flags to the rational human being. It is always important to be critical of information (especially that which they expect you to just believe without evidence or even reading the so-called “report” yourself) that could be used as a justification for yet another war.

Superficial, obvious “reasons” for war are the ones the public swallows, gulping down from the firehose supplied by the ceaseless litany of lies and drivel from the mainstream media. The true reasons can only be found by those willing to not swallow the “crafted narrative.” We must look for the underlying money trails and political agendas of those self-serving leaders…puppet masters who see false flags as tools with State-sponsorship that fulfill their own goals and plans…at the cost (as usual) of We the People. –SHTFPlan

The US government has been looking for a digestible way to go to war with both North Korea and Syria. What a clever and convenient way to wrap this all up in one little UN report. This isn’t to say this IS or IS NOT a false flag, only that it’s important to keep your eyes open and prepare for all possibilities. Never stop asking questions especially when your rights are at stake or global war is possible.

In 2017, The US Government “Lost” $2.2 Million—Every Single Minute

By Matt Agorist

Illustrating the gluttonous nature and disturbing spending habits of the empire that is the United States, the US Treasury released its financial report from 2017 showing that the government lost $1.2 TRILLION dollars in 2017.

Yes, that is TRILLION, with a ‘t’.

The Goldman Sachs insider who was appointed as the Secretary of the Treasury, Steven Mnuchin, celebrated the report, noting that he was “pleased to present the Financial Report of the United State Government,” which showed a loss of $1.2 trillion.

After the opening message celebrating their utter incompetence in managing a budget, the report goes on to note how the US government spent a trillion more dollars than they had. This loss of money will ensure that future generations will be forever burdened with the impossible task of paying back the debt to the Federal Reserve.

According to the report:

The Government’s gross costs of $4.6 trillion, less $431.9 billion in revenues earned for goods and services provided to the public (e.g., Medicare premiums, national park entry fees, and postal service fees), plus $356.5 billion in net losses from changes in assumptions (e.g., interest rates, inflation, disability claims rates) yields the Government’s net cost of $4.5 trillion, an increase of $128.8 billion or 2.9 percent over FY 2016. Deducting $3.4 trillion in tax and other revenues, with some adjustment for unmatched transactions and balances, results in a “bottom line” net operating cost of $1.2 trillion for FY 2017, (an increase of $105.0 billion or 10.0

percent) over FY 2016.

To put this into perspective, the US government lost five times more money than the entire Mexican economy. The loss of $1.2 trillion equates to losing $2,283,105.02 every single minute of 2017—or, $38,051.75 a second.

In 2017, the United States lost over $3 billion every single day and somehow these people think this is sustainable.

What’s so ominous about this loss is the fact that, in 2017, the US government took in a record high $3.3 trillion in taxes and they still managed to lose $1.2 trillion.

As Mnuchin points out in the opening statement, the United States experienced amazing growth, consumer and business confidence are at two-decade highs, and inflation is low and stable. Yet still, they lost $1.2 trillion!

Imagine for a moment what that loss would look like in a recession, or a financial crisis.

As Simon Black points out in an article on Sovereign Man,

If the government loses $1.2 trillion in a GOOD year, how much do you think they’ll lose in a BAD year? How much will they lose when they actually do have a recession to fight? Or another war. Or a major banking crisis?

More importantly, how long can something so unsustainable possibly last?

The answer to that question is, not long.

The national debt is a ticking time bomb. As indicated in their own report, the US government calculated its net worth and the result is mind-boggling.

On their balance sheet, the feds calculated the value of every aircraft carrier, tank, missile, building, national park, government vehicle, all the cash in the bank, all of its property, and then subtracted how much money it owes to the central bank. All the government’s assets, minus what it owes to the bankers equals negative $20.4 TRILLION.

As Black notes, it gets worse:

And according to the government’s own calculations (on page 58), the “total present value of future expenditures in excess of future revenue” for Social Security and Medicare is MINUS $49 TRILLION. Essentially this means that the two largest and most important pension and healthcare programs in the United States are insolvent by nearly $50 trillion. Altogether, the government is in the red by almost $70 trillion.

What’s more, no one in the mainstream media is reporting on this. Everyone is simply riding the runaway train acting like everything will be just fine.

But then again, what else would you expect from an establishment that considers the idea of spending $24,000,000 on a refrigerator for an airplane, a bargain? When presidents spend hundreds of millions of dollars on vacations, it should come as no surprise that our great great grandchildren will be forever in debt to the central bank.

It is also important to point out that in spite of record profits by the world’s largest banks, these same banks are predicting a major stock market collapse. What will happen, then, when the US government has to bail out Wall Street again?

The government is a black hole of spending and debt and the citizens are on the hook for it.

While the outlook may seem bleak, however, those who pay attention and plan for the worst while hoping for the best will use this an opportunity to flourish.

As former Congressman Ron Paul recently said in regard to the inevitable,

I think our stature in the world and our empire will end, and that’s when, hopefully, the doors will be open and [people will] say, ‘Hey, maybe these libertarians have some answers to this.’”

Now may be a good time to get your answers ready.

Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project, where this article first appeared. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Facebook.

The Ghost of Mistakes Past: Islamic Jihadism and France’s Colonial Past

With Daesh militants all but defeated, another battle – one more serious as we may soon find out, has seen western capitals struggle with that very ideology they say to abhor, and yet tacitly supported, as part of their desire to quiet certain geopolitical dynamics in the Greater Middle East region.

France, arguably more predominantly, has wrestled with the repatriation of its ‘Jihadists’ – not all of whom foreign as popular belief would assume. Among France’s most infamous Terror’s militants, sit converts, French born and bred individuals, who, out of ideological inclination embraced Salafi/Wahhabi Islam’s most radical interpretation of the Scriptures: Takfirism.

It is pertinent to note for accuracy’s sake that, Takfirism, and the very concept of Jihad Salafi/Wahhabi clerics advocate, stands antithetical to normative Islam – whether Sunni or Shia. Takfir, which essentially declares an individual’s life forfeited on the basis that he or she is considered to exist outside the realm of Islam, runs again Islam’s most sacred principles of religious freedom, liberty, and above all free will.

While self-defence is indeed enshrined as an inherent Islamic right – and one may posit duty, any affront to a person’s right, dignity, and intrinsic humanity remains a crime, to which no rationalisation could ever be offered. Such reality has not of course prevented men of power to abuse their station by arguing needs over principles so that truths could adhere to their rationale, rather their rationale to espouse Truth.

Religion, while maybe the most powerful catalyst for such cognitive dissonance holds no monopoly … politics and nationalism have too, wielded reason and necessity to run counter to nations and groups’ self-proclaimed beliefs and/or principles.

Colonialism in that context runs parallel to Daesh’s base narrative as it posits ‘liberation’ to rationalise military interventionism and thus justify the violence war inevitably bring in its wake. If Terror has been condemned and decried as a modern-day plague born in a religious vacuum, we ought to realise that its rhetoric is rather ‘conventional’ – at least as far as the rationalisation of violence is concerned. History attests to this.

It is what underpins Terror we ought to address – or maybe better yet map out, before we can ambition to defeat it. Such feat will require we look back at those events, which, compounded across many great decades, led to the rise of Daesh as both a religious and political ideology. If reactionary Jihadism is not indeed a new concept, it was nevertheless revived as a response to a socio-political reality we have yet to admit accountability for.

France’s colonial footprint and the codification of just violence

When France set its eyes upon Algeria back in May 1830, it is freedom from persecution its government advocated to the local populace. And yet, what befell Algerians was indeed servitude. Maybe one France would consider just in the light of the socio-political oppression which existed under the rule of the Ottomans, but that would be to defend slavery from the viewpoint of the enslaver, inferring that precedence should be given to a certain elite.

Such elitism is actually what has fed much of the ideological distortions we grapple with today.

Freedom and Democracy one would like to think are principles which should suffer no such caveats. And yet … yet wars of occupation and colonialism itself were built upon allegations of moral grandeur. What is most interesting is how regimes, governments, and ideological complexes have used eerily similar narrative to support their reasoning

Addressing the French Parliament in 1882, Jules Ferry encapsulated France’s position and ambition as follow: “We must believe that if Providence deigned to confer upon us a mission by making us masters of the earth this mission consists not of attempting an impossible fusion of races but of simply spreading or awakening among the other races the superior notions of which we are the guardians.”

In 1884 Ferry added: “The superior races have a right to dominate the inferior races, to civilize them.”

It is then that this very French notion of ‘mission civilisatrice’ – this mission to civilise the infamous ‘other’ became an institution onto itself, forever the cornerstone, and expression of France’s Republicanism.

A pamphlet issued prior to France’s invasion of Algeria carried the following narrative: “We French, your friends, are leaving for Algiers. We are going to drive out your tyrants, the Turks who persecute you, who steal your goods, and never cease menacing your lives, … our presence on your territory is not to make war on you but only on the person of your pasha. Abandon your pasha: follow our advice. It is good advice and can only make you happy.”

Daesh ideologues argue to this day the ‘morality’ of their aggression in the name of that same elusive concept: Freedom – freedom from the yoke of western civilisation, freedom from religious falsehood (or so they claim), freedom from the enemies, freedom from all they claim holds sway over the ignorant masses.

War as it were has its own language, and it is often it is dressed in claims of peace and security.

France’s North African ambitions and subsequent footing into the Islamic world early 19th century – a world it knew very little about safe maybe from what transpired from Napoleon’s Egyptian adventures, set the tone for centuries of misses, mistrusts, and a resentment which came to feed into Jihadism as the expression of a stolen religious identity and robbed national pride.

Jihadism interestingly enough was, once upon a time, a weapon western capitals had little qualms wielding. On the wake of WW1 Germany was rather keen to see a disintegrating Ottoman Empire call for Jihad against France and Britain so that their respective holds over the Islamic World by way of the colonies would wane. Although such calls were never answered, the logic behind it still holds.

Pan-Islamism remains a powerful dynamic -a devastating one when left in the hands of warlords, as it cuts across national and tribal borders, making its ideologues titans over a sizeable world population. Add to that genuine grievances and a yearning for social-economic empowerment and the rise of Daesh as a trans-national pan-Islamic movement does indeed makes sense.

What is most troubling today is the fact that Daesh’s frontline may soon shift away from the Middle East to a more welcoming landscape right at the heart of the Old Continent. France has borne the brunt of Terror’s fury too many times not to realise that its borders have been already breached.

Unlike Iraq, which, as a nation, found strength in unity through the recognition of its diverse ethno-social political and religious make-up, France stands divided in the conceptualisation of its sovereignty.

France’s difficult colonial past and Paris’ inability to allow its immigrants to find a space within which to find themselves under France’s Republican system has fed a socio-political psychosis that has now reached boiling point. France’s infamous ‘banlieues’ – the violence of late that has transpired from its quarters attest to that.

The rise of the far-right also sits a clear indication of France’s profound social malaise, one which runs parallel to the radicalism of France’s Jihadists.

French President Emanuel Macron warns in his book: Revolution, against those divisions radicals of all flavours have argued to garner support to their respective cause.

“We have an enemy – ISIS. We must fight that enemy relentlessly, both within and without our borders and beyond. However, this in no way provides justification for muddying the issues or being driven apart by tangential quarrels.”

And: “More broadly speaking, the social disintegration that we are currently seeing fuels an identity crisis, which in turn paralyses our ability to act with a single voice.”

How France will address this new challenge will undoubtedly have far-reaching consequences. But before any progress can be made, France will need to own those dynamics it itself architected to the tune of its own territorial ambitions, and intellectual elitism.

What France will do with its Jihadists, and how it will untangle the rationale behind the rise of reactionary Jihadism among its native population will determine much of Europe’s future.

Catherine Shakdam is the Director of Programs of the Shafaqna Institute for Middle Eastern Studies and a political analyst specializing in radical movements, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

FDA’s Lies, Fraud And Corruption

By Catherine J. Frompovich

“’Gee, they relied on a fraud for this application; we should deny it;’ but the FDA Commissioner granted it and put Ketek into the market”!

The drug involved is the antimicrobial agent Sanofi-Aventis makes called Ketek®, which has been linked to dozens of cases of liver injury!

The New England Journal of Medicine published “The FDA and the Case of Ketek” by David B. Ross, MD, PhD, which readers ought to take the time to read to understand how FDA truly has become ‘the handmaiden’ of the pharmaceutical industry and vaccine makers collectively called Big Pharma!  The NEJM article states:

A routine FDA inspection of the practices of the physician who enrolled the most patients — more than 400 — uncovered fraud, including complete fabrication of patient enrollment. The inspector notified FDA criminal investigators, and the physician is currently serving a 57-month sentence in federal prison for her actions. Inspections of nine other sites enrolling high numbers of patients revealed serious violations of trial conduct, raising substantial concerns about the overall integrity of the study. In the end, 4 of the 10 inspected sites were referred for criminal investigation. [CJF emphasis]

According to Constitutional Attorney Jonathan W. Emord, the clinical trial for Ketek never happened; they made it up!  What kind of magical consensus science is the foremost industry in the world supposedly to protect and enhance health up to?  Fraud, fraud and more fraud!  Does that affect vaccines, too?  Does the bear you-know-what in the woods?

Against this backdrop of concerns about both safety and fraud, critical questions also arose about the efficacy of Ketek, which had been examined only in noninferiority trials

Nevertheless, the FDA approved Ketek entirely on the basis of noninferiority trials.  [NEJM]

In the following video, Attorney Emord discusses the Ketek fraud case, which ought to bring healthcare consumers to demand total reforms at FDA, if not its total dismantling in favor of a new federal agency totally free of Big Pharma influences—financial or otherwise, specifically the revolving door policy that exists between former employees of Big Pharma, FDA and the CDC.  Americans deserve better!

https://youtu.be/Tgf-nBeI1g8?t=83

In another video, Attorney Emord is interviewed by Health Ranger Mike Adams regarding

Medical/Health/Drug Censorship Occurs in Countries that Regulate Drugs

An interview with Jonathan Emord, Esq. Apr. 27, 2010

The paradigm has to collapse because it’s contrary to scientific profusion of information in the literature.

Censorship literally sacrifices human life!

https://youtu.be/kbJSxrOxZ-M?t=41

Probably nothing is more profoundly indicative of the actual fraud, deceit and total disregard for U.S. law by the FDA than what Emord wrote in two of his books, which my co-editor Laraine Abbey, RN, and I cited in the 2011 monograph Vaccines & Vaccines: The Need for Congressional Investigation, which was presented to various Congressional committees for action, but apparently fell on deaf ears and blind eyes.

In the Introduction to that monograph, we cited two of Attorney Emord’s books wherein Emord tells his personal experience with an FDA attorney how the FDA deliberately states it will not abide by a legal court order!  That ‘chutzpah’ on the part of FDA should be considered criminal action subject to prosecution of all involved.  What do you think?  If you or I didn’t obey a court order, we’d be slapped with a “contempt of court” and probably find our derrieres sitting in some jail cell for many moons.

In two other well argued, erudite books, Global Censorship of Health Information and The Rise of Tyranny—How Federal Agencies Abuse Power and Pose Risks to Your Life and Liberty, authored by a brilliant constitutional attorney, Jonathan Emord shows how frighteningly lawless some of our regulatory agencies have become.  Emord tells us, “…FDA refuses to honor five decisions holding its censorship unconstitutional.” 1

An attorney in the FDA Chief Counsel’s office regarding a court order to FDA made this really shocking statement, “Jonathan, the FDA will never abide by the Pearson decision.” 2   Despite Jonathan’s noting it was a final and binding decision—an order of the court—the FDA attorney said, “That may be so, but I am telling you the FDA will never abide by that court decision, never, ever.” 3   Emord tells us, “His words pierced to the very core of my being.  Here was an agency’s legal officer telling me that the agency was, intentionally, lawless.” 4

1 Emord, JW. Global Censorship of Health Information (Washington, DC: Sentinel Press, 2010) 16.

2 Ibid. 17

3 Ibid. 17

4 Ibid. 17

With all the documented proof we have on file and in the press of fraud at the FDA and the CDC, WHY are U.S. healthcare consumers being poisoned, prosecuted and denied their rights to health self-determination by two rogue federal health agencies that apparently believe fraud and the new science ‘norm’ “consensus science” literally can be pushed down people’s throats as ‘legal’ prescription drugs not properly investigated or tested; and by vaccines, not properly tested and also fraudulently presented/documented for licensure, which are injected into newborns, infants, toddlers, teens, adults and senior citizens by states mandates, all of which truly are unconstitutional in this constitutional republic,  but yet NO majority of members in Congress has enough backbone to do anything about it. Follow the money?

When will medical tyranny in the USA stop? 

When the CDC and FDA are housecleaned, decontaminated and finally prosecuted for their fraudulent cultures!

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available

How To Stamp Out Cultural Marxism In A Single Generation

There are very few legitimate cultural divisions in the world. Most of them are arbitrarily created, not only by political and financial elites, but also by the useful idiots and mindless acolytes infesting the sullied halls of academia.

It is perhaps no mistake that cultural Marxists in the form of “social justice warriors”, PC busybodies and feminists tend to create artificial divisions between people and “classes” while attacking and homogenizing very real and natural divisions between individuals based on biological reality and inherent genetic and psychological ability. This is what cultural Marxists do: divide and conquer or homogenize and conquer, whatever the situation happens to call for.

They do this most commonly by designated arbitrary “victim status” to various classes, thus dividing them from each other based on how “oppressed” they supposedly are.  The less statistically prominent a particular group is (less represented in a job field, media, education, population, etc.) in any western society based on their color, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, etc., generally the more victim group status is afforded to them by social justice gatekeepers.  Whites and males (straight males) are of course far at the bottom of their list of people who have reason to complain and we are repeatedly targeted by SJW organizations and web mobs as purveyors of some absurd theory called “the patriarchy”.

Although cultural marxism does indeed target every individual and harm every individual in the long run, my list of personal solutions outlined in this article will be directed in large part at the categories of people most attacked by the social justice cult today.

I do not write often about PC cultism and social justice because the movement is only a symptom of a greater problem, namely the problem of collectivism. The only true and concrete social (group) division is the division between collectivists and individualists: between those who believe the individual should be subservient to the group mind and those who believe the group is meaningless without the individual mind.

I have already spoken on the root dangers and logical inconsistencies of the social justice cult in articles such as ‘The Twisted Motives Behind Political Correctness’ and ‘The Future Costs Of Politically Correct Cultism.’

There are many intelligent commentators on the Web who have consistently demolished the PC mob with reason and logic, and I leave that battle to them. In this article I would like to continue my examination but with the goal of presenting some real and tangible solutions. And like most solutions to most problems, it is the individual who is required to draw the line in the sand and change the way he approaches the realm of cultural Marxism. It is not up to groups, organizations or governments.

First, let’s be clear, cultural Marxism has already done most of the damage it can possibly do to our way of life. And by damage, I mean the end of long-standing foundational pillars of society that provide stability and prosperity, including traditional marriage (not government-licensed marriage), family, gender “roles,” etc. (which cultural Marxists openly boast about tearing down).

In Western nations male suicide rates are way up. Women’s proclaimed levels of happiness and contentment are way down, despite the fact that they have had wage equality for decades (yes, the wage gap is a perpetually pontificated Lochness monster-sized myth that was debunked years ago by economists like Thomas Sowell), despite the fact that they have surpassed men in educational participation and despite the fact that they have total control over family planning.

Marriage rates are at historic lows since the 1970s and the rise of social justice activism. Of course, the argument is often presented that economic decline has more to do with this than cultural Marxism. However, setting aside the rising tide of men who fear being bled dry through divorce settlements based on double standards, the West’s economic decline (and thus marriage decline) can be correlated to the increase in overt debt spending. And debt spending is driven directly by socialist legislation, entitlement programs and social welfare addiction, more so even than it can be correlated to military spending.

Therefore, cultural Marxism and its vicious attempts to forcefully “harmonize” wealth through taxation and welfare have indeed caused the very economic conditions by which marriage is made untenable and families are made unstable.

While women become more and more unhappy, men and masculinity are essentially demonized by cultural Marxists (mainly feminists) as “toxic.” This propaganda campaign has been so successful that men in many first world nations are beginning to pursue, for all intents and purposes, an asexual lifestyle safer from collectivist intrusions and judgments.

As if the psychological browbeating were not enough, the chemistry of the male body is also being warped by estrogen-imitating chemicals present in industrial products, plastics and soy-based foods. A decline in normal levels of male testosterone and an ever increasing hormonal feminization of younger generations of men and boys is becoming prevalent.

Indirect chemical influences aren’t the only threat. Direct drugging of boys (with far greater frequency than girls) with psychotropics in order to subdue their natural tendencies towards physicality and frenetic activity is epidemic in public schools, all with the goal of making boys behave more like girls.

Finally, the erasure of free speech and thought is always the holy grail of cultural Marxists; but this is not always done through government power — at least not right away. Social justice cultists rely more on collective pressure and public shaming tactics to engineer an environment in which people feel compelled to self-censor rather than deal with the hailstorm of witch hunters and wagging fingers.

Cultural Marxists do use government force to police what they consider thought crimes, but usually in an incremental manner. One day, it’s the use of government to demand associations, as with a Christian-owned cake business being forced to work for another party that feels entitled to a gay wedding cake. Another day, it might be a public school being forced to allow boys dressed as girls in the girls’ bathroom or locker room. Another day, it might be the implementation of lowered standards and quotas to force businesses to hire people with victim-group status, even if they are unqualified for the job.

All of these actions impede upon the individual freedoms and privacy rights of others, all under the guise of “equality.” And because cultural Marxists need to constantly observe ever greater modes of oppression and inequality in order to justify their existence, the impositions on individual liberty will never end. Today, people may argue that such violations are “minor” and not to be concerned over. It is happening to strangers or distant neighbors, not to them; so why should they care? Liberty movement champions know full well why this thinking is idiotic; the trampling of one person’s individual liberties is the trampling of ALL people’s individual liberties. Totalitarianism is a virus that feeds on one person to the next until everyone is on the menu.

It is not enough anymore to simply continue pointing out the insanity of political correctness; we must also take useful steps toward reversing the destruction already wrought.

And so, here are my solutions, which must be enacted by individuals in their daily lives regardless of the potential backlash. Do you have leftist leaning friends or family members? It doesn’t matter. Are you employed in a workplace crawling with social justice ideologues? Stop seeing them as part of the equation because they do not matter. Worried about losing a relationship if you make a stand? Say good riddance. This is what must be done by free thinkers if they are to counter and reverse the collectivist nightmare of cultural Marxism.

Feel no shame: Social justice relies on shaming tactics, usually by slandering an opponent with a label that does not really apply to him, in order to control his arguments and behavior. If you don’t care about being called a bigot, a racist, a sexist, a misogynist, a homophobe, etc., then there is not really much that they can do to you.

Do not self-censor: This does not mean you should go out of your way to be antagonistic or act like an ass, but the thought police have power only if you give power to them. Say what you want to say when you want to say it, and do it with a smile. Let the PC police froth and scream until they have an aneurism. Cultural Marxists are generally weaklings. They avoid physical confrontation like they avoid logic, so why fear them?

Realize there is no such thing as white privilege or male privilege: In reality, there is only institutionalized “privilege” for victim-status groups. There is no privilege for whites, males, white males or straight white males. When confronted with such claims, demand to see proof of such privilege. Invariably, you will get a long list of first world problems and complaints backed by nothing but easily debunked talking points and misrepresented statistics. People should not feel guilty for being born the way they are, and this includes us “white male devils.”

Demand facts to back claims: Cultural Marxists tend to argue on the basis of opinion rather than fact. Present facts to counter their claims, and demand facts and evidence in return. Opinions are irrelevant if the person is not willing to present supporting facts when asked.

Do not play the game of “unconscious bias”: If social justice cultists can’t counter your position with facts or logic, they will invariably turn to the old standby that you are limited in your insight because you have not lived in the shoes of a – (insert victim group here).  I agree.  In fact, I would point out that this reality of limited perception also applies to THEM as well.  They have not lived in my shoes, therefore they are in no position to claim I enjoy “privilege” while they do not.  This is why facts and evidence are so important, and why anecdotal evidence and personal feelings are irrelevant where cultural Marxism is concerned.

Let cultural Marxists know their fears and feelings do not matter: No one is entitled to have their feelings addressed by others. And, a person’s fears are ultimately unimportant. Whether the issue is the nonexistent “rape culture” or the contempt cultural Marxists feel over private gun ownership, their irrational fears are not our concern. Why should any individual relinquish his liberties in the name of placating frightened nobodies?

Demand that society respect your inherent individual rights: Collectivism’s ultimate propaganda message is that there is no such thing as inherent rights or liberties and that all rights are arbitrary and subject to the whims of the group or the state. This is false. I have written extensively in the past on inherent rights, inborn psychological contents and natural law, referencing diverse luminaries, scientists and thinkers, including Thomas Aquinas, Carl Gustave Jung, Steven Pinker, etc., and I welcome readers to study my many articles on individualism.  Freedom is an inborn conception with universally understood aspects. Period. No group or collective is more important than individual liberty. No artificial society has preeminence over the individuals within that society. As long as a person is not directly impeding the life, liberty, prosperity and privacy of another person, he should be left alone.

Maintain your rights; they do not hurt other people: PC cultists will invariably argue that every person, whether he knows it or not, is indirectly harming others with his attitude, his beliefs, his refusal to associate, even his very breathing.  “We live in a society”, they say, “and everything we do affects everyone else…”.  Don’t take such accusations seriously; these people do not understand how freedom works.

Say, for instance, hypothetically, that I refuse to bake a gay wedding cake for a couple and I am accused of violating their rights in the name of preserving my own. I would immediately point out that no one is entitled to a gay wedding cake, baked by me or anyone else and I have every right to choose my associations based on whatever criteria I see fit. Now, a corrupt government entity may claim I do not have that right. But the fact is I do, and no one — not even government — can force me to bake a cake if I don’t want to. Also, I would point out that the gay couple in question has every right in a free society to bake their OWN damn cake or open their own cake shop to compete with mine. This is how freedom works. It is not based on collective entitlement; it is based on personal responsibility.

Refuse to deny the scientific fact of biological gender: Gender is first and foremost a genetic imperative. Society does not determine gender roles; nature does. A man who chops up his body and takes hormone pills to look like a woman is not and will never be a woman. A woman who tapes down her breasts and gets a short haircut will never be a man. There is no such thing as “transgendered” people. No amount of social justice or wishful thinking will ever allow them to reverse their genetic proclivities. Their psychological and sexual leanings do not change their inborn biological reality.

By extension, we should refuse to play along with this nonsense. I will never refer to a man in a wig and dress as a “woman.” I will never refer to a woman with identity issues as “transgendered.” They are what nature made them, and we should not police our pronouns just to falsely reassure them that they can deny nature.

Deny the illusion of Utopian equality: There is no such thing as pure equality.  Society is not a homogeneous entity, it is an abstraction built around a group of unique individuals.  Individuals can be naturally gifted, or naturally challenged.  But there will always be some people who are more apt towards success than others.

I have no problem whatsoever with the idea of equality of opportunity, which is exactly what we have in this country (except in the world of elitist finance which is purely driven by nepotism).  I do have a problem with the lie of universal equality through engineered means.

Standards of success should not be lowered in order to accommodate the least skilled people to facilitate artificial parity.  For example, I constantly hear the argument that more people with victim group status should be given greater representation in positions of influence and regard within our culture, from science and engineering, to media, to business CEO’s, to politics, etc.  The key word here is “given”, rather than “earned”.  There is nothing wrong with one group of people excelling in a field more than another group, and there is nothing wrong with inequality when it comes to individual achievement.  We must begin refusing to reward people for mediocrity and punishing success simply because the winners are not part of a designated victim group.

If you are a man, embrace your role: I am a man and cannot claim to know what specific solutions women should take to counter cultural Marxism. I would love to read an article written on the subject by a woman in the Liberty Movement.  I will say that men in particular have a considerable task ahead in terms of their personal endeavors if they hope to repair the destruction of social justice.

For thousands of years, men have been the primary industrial force behind human progress. Today, they are relegated to cubicles and customer service, to video games and Web fantasies, to drug addictions and a lack of responsibility. If we have any chance of undoing the damage of cultural Marxism, modern men must take on their original roles as producers, inventors, entrepreneurs, protectors, builders and warriors once again. They should do this for their own benefit, and not for the validation of others.

You don’t have to prove to anyone you do “manly things”, just go out and do them. Most importantly, become dangerous. Men are meant to be dangerous beings. That does not mean we are meant to be indiscriminately violent (just as women aren’t meant to be indiscriminately violent), but we are supposed to be threatening to those who would threaten us. Modern society has NOT removed the need for masculinity and I believe people will begin realizing this the more our culture sinks into economic despair. Train in martial arts, learn tactical firearms handling, go hunting and don’t take lip from people. In my opinion, every man should know how to kill things, even if he never plans on using those abilities.

Home-school your children: It’s simple, if you don’t want your kids propagandized, if you truly want them to be free from collectivist conditioning, then you will make the sacrifice and extract them from public schooling. With the introduction of Common Core into U.S. schools in particular, there is no other recourse but home schooling to prevent the brainwashing of cultural Marxism. If you do not do this, you are relying on the hope that your children will escape with their critical thinking abilities intact. Some do, and some don’t. Others turn into mindless social justice zombies. You can give them an advantage by removing them from a poisonous environment, and that is what matters.

The insane lie that cultural Marxists seem to have conned themselves and others into believing is that their “activism” is somehow anti-establishment. In fact, social justice is constantly coddled and supported by the establishment. From politicians to judges to media pundits to the blogosphere, the overwhelming majority of people in positions of traditional power (even in supposedly conservative circles) have been more than happy to become the enforcers of the social justice warrior agenda, an agenda representing a minuscule portion of the public. There is no establishment for the PC army to fight; the establishment bias works vastly more in favor of their ideology than any other. Cultural Marxists ARE the establishment.

If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here.  We greatly appreciate your patronage.

 

The post How To Stamp Out Cultural Marxism In A Single Generation appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.