Showing posts with label hate crimes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hate crimes. Show all posts

Friday, December 8, 2017

How the Left Silences Dissent and How We Can Fight Back




Published on Nov 18, 2017





Christine Brim speaking at the American Freedom Alliance Conference: “Crushing Free Speech – How the Left Silences Dissent and How We Can Fight Back”.



Christine Brim has worked in project management, risk assessment, business continuity planning, market research and media production for high-tech start-ups, U.S. government clients and Fortune 500 companies, especially in the IT and aerospace industries. She has published in the areas of policy, communications and logistics. She received her MBA from George Mason University and is certified in knowledge engineering. Previously she served at the Center for Security Policy as a vice president and chief operating officer. She is president of the Center for Policy Communications.








If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please make a donation to support our work.  
You can donate HERE.

The post How the Left Silences Dissent and How We Can Fight Back appeared first on Oath Keepers.

Monday, August 21, 2017

Will Charlottesville Be a Pretext for Toughening Police State Laws?

Will Charlottesville Be a Pretext for Toughening Police State Laws? | police-car | Government Control Special Interests Tyranny & Police State US News


The aftermath of 9/11 transformed America into a police state. Obama continued what Bush/Cheney began – cracking down hard on fundamental freedoms, subverting constitutionally protected rights.


Will Charlottesville be used as a pretext for more of the same? Violence last weekend was reprehensible. Responsible parties should be held fully accountable – federal, state and local laws adequate to handle things.


Attorney General Jeff Sessions opened an investigation into possible hate crime charges. Bipartisan leadership in Congress urged hate crime and terrorist charges against James Fields, accused of mowing down counter-demonstrators, causing one death and numerous injuries.



Federal hate crimes legislation was first enacted in 1968 – defined as threatening to use force “to willfully interfere with any person because of race, color, religion, or national origin and because the person is participating in a federally protected activity, such as public education, employment, jury service, travel, or the enjoyment of public accommodations, or helping another person to do so,” according to the Justice Department.


Additional hate crimes legislation followed in 1988, 1996 and 2009 – expanding the federal definition of this crime. As of mid-July 2016, the Justice Department charged 258 individuals with hate crimes – since 2009 alone.


The so-called Shepard Byrd Act (October 2009) made it a federal crime “to willfully cause bodily injury, or attempt to do so using a dangerous weapon, because of the victim’s actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin,” according to the DOJ.


It expanded previous hate crimes legislation. Is further expansion likely post-Charlottesville? Did Fields commit a hate crime and/or terrorism, or was he solely ideologically motivated against anyone opposed to his point of view?


He already faces murder and other charges. No evidence suggests he targeted individuals for their race, religion, national origin or other factors hate crimes legislation specifies.


The 1968 Civil Rights Act criminalizes use of force to injure or intimidate anyone “participating lawfully in speech or peaceful assembly.”
It usually targets voting rights violations, not incidents like Charlottesville, though it’s appropriate using it to press charges against individuals responsible for violence last weekend.


AG Jeff Sessions called the deadly car ramming attack “domestic terrorism,” saying “we will charge and advance the investigation toward the most serious charges that can be brought…”


So far, Fields is charged with second-degree murder, malicious wounding, and failure to stop at the scene of an accident resulting in a death – under Virginia law.


Will federal hate crime and terrorism charges follow? Will current federal laws be expanded to be harsher? Will civil liberties suffer another body blow? Will tyranny advance further toward becoming full-blown?


US history is littered with repressive laws – Constitutional protections targeted since the 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts restricted First Amendment freedoms. Police state harshness defines US policy, civil liberties grievously harmed. Anything goes in the name of national security is OK.


For the first time in US history, Patriot Act provisions created the crime of domestic terrorism. Section 802 applies to anyone allegedly engaged in “dangerous to human life” actions. US citizens and permanent residents are vulnerable to accusations of violating federal, state, or local laws if they:


• intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
• influence government policy by intimidation or coercion; and/or
• affect government conduct by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.


The devil is in the definition. Peaceful demonstrators can be targeted like violent ones. The First Amendment doesn’t discriminate against points of view hostile to government practices.


Academic, media and speech freedoms are fundamental in all free and open societies. Using Charlottesville or similar violent incidents elsewhere as pretexts to compromise constitutional rights is what tyranny is all about.

Saturday, July 8, 2017

Hate Crimes and Federal Troops in Chicago – KrisAnne Hall

Liberty First is not just a motto, it is a way of life. What happens when your favorite senators pass a resolution to put the federal government in charge of “hate crimes?” What happens when your favorite president wants to “send in the troops” to our local cities and towns? We must be Liberty First or we will be Liberty Lost


H/T: Cal


“The beginning is good, but at or about 51.05 it is excellent because it really breaks down and explains this new “hate crimes” color of law and how it does away from the US Constitution, how it is the abandonment of due process.


It is all apropos, but that is most concerning for LE, military though at this time they do not know or understand it.   It is another directive that has them working AGAINST the US Constitution, has them breaking their Oath.  “Hate crimes” are not crimes.  Crimes like assault, murder, etc are always crimes and the sentencing can be modified by the ‘why’ it was committed.  But when they are sent out to get people for what they say, they work 100% AGAINST our legitimate government.  Most will not understand this because they do not understand the underhanded way this is being done against the American people.  They will think, much like the Patriot Act, Free Trade, etc that the name sounds good, and how it is explained sounds good, but it is actually another way to go beyond and AGAINST the US Constitution, against our legitimate government.”


Original located at, http://krisannehall.com/hate-crimes-f…


Published on Jul 8, 2017 – Hate Crimes and Federal Troops in Chicago. – July 2017 By KrisAnne Hall