Showing posts with label Renters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Renters. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 7, 2017

“Homeless Explosion”: Tech Boom, Surging Rents Creating Homeless Crisis On America’s West Coast

This report was originally published by Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge


tents


America’s liberal left coast states count themselves among the most adamant supporters of controversial pieces of legislation intended to support low-income families. From their stunningly high income tax rates to their $15 minimum wage mandates, states like California and Washington are leading the charge on implementing Bernie’s socialist agenda.


Of course, some of the biggest advocates of that socialist agenda are the billionaire leaders of Silicon Valley’s largest tech companies…which is precisely why it’s so ironic that it’s the “tech boom” being enjoyed by those billionaires that has resulted in surging housing prices and what SFGate described earlier today as a “homeless explosion pushing West Coast cities to the brink.”


Housing prices are soaring here thanks to the tech industry, but the boom comes with a consequence: A surge in homelessness marked by 400 unauthorized tent camps in parks, under bridges, on freeway medians and along busy sidewalks. The liberal city is trying to figure out what to do.


“I’ve got economically zero unemployment in my city, and I’ve got thousands of homeless people that actually are working and just can’t afford housing,” said Seattle City Councilman Mike O’Brien. “There’s nowhere for these folks to move to.”


That struggle is not Seattle’s alone. A homeless crisis is rocking the entire West Coast, pushing abject poverty into the open like never before.


Nationally, homelessness has been trending down, partly because governments and nonprofit groups have gotten better at moving people into housing. That’s true in many West Coast cities, too, but the flow the other direction is even faster.


“So everybody who was just hanging on because they had cheap rent, they’re losing that … and they wind up outside,” said Margaret King, director of housing programs for the nonprofit DESC in Seattle. “It’s just exploded.”


According to stats gathered by the Associated Press, some 168,000 people in California, Oregon and Washington count themselves among the growing tally of homeless folks who can’t afford housing.


Official counts taken earlier this year in California, Oregon and Washington show 168,000 homeless people in the three states, according to an AP tally of every jurisdiction in those states that reports homeless numbers to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. That is 19,000 more than were counted in 2015, although the numbers may not be directly comparable because of factors ranging from the weather to new counting methods.


—During the same period, the number of unsheltered people in the three states climbed 18 percent to 105,000.


Rising rents are the main culprit. The median one-bedroom apartment in the San Francisco Bay Area is more expensive than it is in the New York City metro area, for instance.


—Since 2015, at least 10 cities or municipal regions in California, Oregon and Washington have declared emergencies due to the rise of homelessness, a designation usually reserved for natural disasters.


Of course, when home prices double in a matter of just a few years and are seemingly just as volatile as a tech stock circa March 2000, you know there’s a problem.



Meanwhile, as we pointed out a few weeks ago (see: San Diego’s Deadly Hepatitis A Outbreak Turns “Statewide Epidemic” As “Outbreak Could Last Years”), the homeless crisis in California has resulted in an alarming hepatitis A outbreak that started in San Diego and is now on the verge of reaching statewide epidemic status as cases have spread through homeless tent cities all the way north to Sacramento.


California’s outbreak of hepatitis A, already the nation’s second largest in the last 20 years, could continue for many months, even years, health officials said Thursday.


At least 569 people have been infected and 17 have died of the virus since November in San Diego, Santa Cruz and Los Angeles counties, where local outbreaks have been declared.


Dr. Monique Foster, a medical epidemiologist with the Division of Viral Hepatitis at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told reporters Thursday that California’s outbreak could linger even with the right prevention efforts.


“It’s not unusual for them to last quite some time — usually over a year, one to two years,” Foster said.


Of course, as SFGate points out, local governments on the West Coast are responding to the crisis in the best way they know how, namely by raising taxes…


All along the West Coast, local governments are scrambling for answers — and taxpayers are footing the bill.


Voters have approved more than $8 billion in spending since 2015 on affordable housing and other anti-homelessness programs, mostly as tax increases. Los Angeles voters, for example, approved $1.2 billion to build 10,000 units of affordable housing to address a homeless population that’s reached 34,000 people within city limits.


which should only serve to accelerate the number of businesses relocating to Texas.


Thursday, January 5, 2017

After AirBnB Ban, New Yorkers Show The Country How to Stand Up to Government

January 5, 2017   |   Alice Salles




(ANTIMEDIA) Tacitus, a senator and historian of the Roman Empire, once wrote that when “laws were most numerous, … the commonwealth was most corrupt.”


Much like the people of the Roman Empire, United States residents now suffer due to the country’s overly-regulated system. Too many rules, Tacitus would have repeated, indicate corruption. But America’s love for crony capitalism is deep-rooted and allows special interests the means to leave nothing to chance. The result? Government and its representatives now have more power than ever, and the young individual is poorer today than those of past generations.



As local and state governments chase the same unattainable goal, passing more laws to keep the individual beholden to powerful interests, people working in the shadows seem to thrive — at least, that’s what recent reports on AirBnB hosts in New York suggest.


In October 2016, New York City banned short-term rentals, imposingfines of up to $7,500 for advertising rentals with a term of less than 30 days.” Feeling that the punishment would target AirBnB users the hardest, the company hit back. They filed a lawsuit claiming the law imposes “irreparable harm.” But shortly after, the company decided to drop the case, promising to avoid retaliating “as long as New York City only enforces the new law against hosts and does not fine [AirBnB] itself.


As the ban was signed into law, the future seemed uncertain for New York hosts using the home-sharing app. After all, many could drop their listings altogether due to the city’s threat — and worse, nobody would blame them for it. But as the holiday season approached, AirBnBers remained defiant.


According to the company, there were more than 55,000 rentals in New York City “on the final night of 2016, up from about 47,000 on last New Year’s Eve.” All in all, the AirBnB added, “[t]here were more Airbnb rentals in New York City than anywhere else on the globe as 2016 became 2017.”



While this defiance represents a success for the San Francisco-based short-term rental service, it also demonstrates how much individuals are willing to risk in order to handle their property as they see fit.


But while many still believe the massive demonstration could help persuade local officials to change their minds on the ban, local and federal lawmakers are used to passing — rather than repealing — legislation. Unless something major changes, it’s unlikely that locals will succeed in undoing this ban following the company’s abandonment of the cause. Nevertheless, as the city of New York adds yet another pile of laws to its already heavy books, law enforcement continues to claim is lacks the resources to actually enforce these local rules.



If the goal is to live freely, breaking the laws in such a saturated environment may not be a responsible action if you’re unwilling to spend time in jail or pay a fine, but it is the action many choose to take, anyway. After all, if law enforcement cannot enforce new, invasive laws, locals are better off ignoring them.



This article (After AirBnB Ban, New Yorkers Show The Country How to Stand Up to Government) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alice Salles and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11 pm Eastern/8 pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, please email the error and name of the article to edits@theantimedia.org.