Showing posts with label Hawthorne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hawthorne. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

"Rotten To The Core" OSI Shares Plunge 15% After Muddy Waters Unveils Short Position

Muddy Waters" founder Carson Block unveiled his latest short play Wednesday morning. And instead of being another obviously fraudulent Chinese company, Block"s target is OSI Systems, an American firm that manufactures security equipment x-ray machines and metal detectors. The company is best known as the owner of Rapiscan Systems - a division that manufacturers scanning machines used at airports.


In a 13-minute video, Block lays out his research, explaining how he suspects OSI’s executives are guilty of multiple violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for paying kickbacks to local officials who in turn rewarded it lucrative contracts. But as if corruption weren"t enough, Block explains how roughly half of the company’s EBITDA is tied to turnkey contract in Mexico that could disappear as soon as next month.


The company is "rotten to the core" warns Block, "we have smoking gun evidence" as the importance of the contract to the company’s bottom line has been obscured by the fact that it represents only 15% of total revenues.



Tracing the threads of corruption led Block to Albania, Mexico and Puerto Rico, three locations where OSI has won lucrative concessions by offering kickbacks to local government officials - kickbacks that were readily accepted.


“I know this will sound crazy - but Albania is a pretty corrupt place," Block says, before explaining that it was practically "an open secret" that OSI benefited from bribing local officials.



For one of OSI’s concessions in Albania, the company turned over half of the contract to a local shell company for roughly $4.50, according to official documents.


As is typical when Block announces a short, OSI - which has a market cap of about $1.3 billion - was down about 15%.



In a statement provided to Zero Hedge, Block said he’s short OSI because he feels it’s “rotten to the core."


“We are short OSI Systems, Inc. because we think it is rotten to the core. We believe it obtained a major turnkey contract in Albania through corruption. It is likely that OSIS’s accounts are misstated as a result.


 


We believe the pricing of its Mexico turnkey contract does not stand up to scrutiny. This contract is up for renewal in 2018, and we estimate that it accounted for more than 50% of OSIS’s FY2017 EBITDA.


 


Non-renewal or a material reduction in pricing of the Mexico contract would seemingly have a significant impact on OSIS’s profits. Former employees’ statements support our view that OSIS is rotting from the inside."



Block’s latest bet comes on the heels of a stunning victory for his firm. Last month, Huishan Dairy entered provisional liquidation, validating Block’s call - made about 10 months earlier - that the company’s shares would go to zero.


Now, the question is: Will he do it again?
 









Friday, July 21, 2017

Did Elon Musk just confirm that the moon landings were faked?

Mother should I trust the government?
-Pink Floyd, Mother


Elon Musk just announced that SpaceX abandons propulsive landing plans for Red Dragon mission to Mars.


In my opinion, we should not be surprised.  


NASA supposedly used propulsive landing for the Apollo missions to the moon...in 1969.


I ask you to please click the following hyperlinks to read three articles, carefully, watch one 3-1/3 minute video, closely, and then draw your own conclusions about the Apollo Moon landings that we are told occured nearly 50 years ago.



First, an article from RT, today:  





 SpaceX abandons propulsive landing plans for Red Dragon mission to Mars



“The reason we decided not to pursue that heavily is that it would have taken a tremendous amount of effort to qualify that for safety for crew transport,” Musk said. “That’s why we are not pursuing it. It could be something that we bring back later, but it doesn’t seem like the right way to apply resources right now.”



 


Musk added that he did not think that propulsive landing was the best approach.



https://www.rt.com/usa/397023-musk-dragon-mars-propulsive/




Second, my article from ZeroHedge, last year, 2016:





I like velcro and used to drink Tang, but about the moon, was NASA really full of horseshit?



" My premise is that President Kennedy wasn"t an aerospace engineer, he was a politician faced with the Russians and their satellites scaring the shit out of his constituency.  He called our shot, but we couldn"t make it.  So they lied." 



http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-03/i-velcro-and-used-drink-tang-wa...




Third, an article from Physics Professor, Dr. Oleg Oleynik, in 2012, and updated in 2017*:





A Stereoscopic method of verifying Apollo lunar surface images



"Thus, based on the above examples, this study concludes that the Apollo 15 photographic record does NOT depict real lunarscapes with distant backgrounds located more than a kilometre away from the camera."



"These pictures were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective."





http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm



* Hat tip to Medium Giraffe



Fourth, a youtube video of the Apollo 11 astronaut press conference upon returning from the moon, July 20,1969*:





Apollo 11 Television Press Conference





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RcKLAo62Ro



* Hat tip to Cognitive Dissonance





Do these three guys, who supposedly just came back from the moon with two of them landing and returning, look and sound like they just came back from the moon?



And here is the full hour and half press conference. Listen to the actual words and sentence structure as well as the body language, which is screaming out-loud disingenuous...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RcKLAo62Ro




What do you think, now?



Peace, liberty, and prosperity,


h_h