WATCH: Morgan Freeman Just Endorsed Neocon Plan for WW3, and the Left is Loving It

“We have been attacked. We are at war,” says Morgan Freeman, as he appears in an unscrupulous propaganda video the likes of which have not been seen in the modern era.

Tuesday, The Committee to Investigate Russia, an organization whose advisory board includes James Clapper, the former director of National Intelligence; Charlie Sykes, the conservative political commentator; Max Boot, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations; and Norman Ornstein, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute whose board members include former vice president and neocon war monger, Dick Cheney.

These deep state politicos are joined in their propagandistic endeavor by Hollywood director Rob Reiner and neoconservative media attaché David Frum, the senior editor of The Atlantic.

What more is there to say? pic.twitter.com/sVCbUJOEX2

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) September 19, 2017

Make no mistake that the use of Morgan Freeman, as a tool for the War Party’s agenda, is a purely psychological tactic meant to instill trust in the words he is reading for his deep state puppet masters in an effort to elicit a fear response from the American public. Using such an iconic figure is a strategy by the neocon/neolib alliance to gain trust in the indoctrination being perpetuated by the imperialists — that Russia is the enemy.

The video, starring Morgan Freeman, is rife with nationalist imagery of bald eagles, American flags, and U.S. soldiers, reads as follows:

Imagine this movie script: A former KGB spy, angry at the collapse of his motherland, plots a course for revenge. Taking advantage of the chaos, he works his way up through the ranks of a post-Soviet Russia, and becomes president. He establishes an authoritarian regime, then he sets his sights on his sworn enemy: the United States. And like the true KGB spy he is, he secretly uses cyber warfare to attack democracies around the world. Using social media to spread propaganda and false information, he convinces people in democratic societies to distrust their media, their political processes, even their neighbors.

Advertisment

And he wins.

Vladimir Putin is that spy, and this is no movie script.

We need our president to speak directly to us and tell us the truth. We need him to sit behind the desk in the Oval Office and say, “My fellow Americans. During this past election, we came under attack by the Russian government. I’ve called on Congress and our intelligence community to use every resource available to conduct a thorough investigation to determine exactly how this happened.”

The free world is counting on us for leadership. For 241 years, our democracy has been a shining example to the world of what we can all aspire to. And we owe it to the brave people who have fought and died to protect this great nation and save democracy. And we owe it to our future generations to continue the fight.

Interestingly, Russia is no more of an authoritarian regime than the United States is an authoritarian regime, as it was western politicos that essentially wrote the Russian constitution in an effort to create another subservient vassal nation beholden to the hegemonic dictates of the western alliance and the international banksters they serve.

READ MORE:  VIDEO: Morgan Freeman Explains What"s Wrong With Black History Month in Under 2 Minutes

Furthermore, the entire narrative espoused by Freeman is completely fallacious.

The US government and its western allies are no longer able to indoctrinate the public with group think as they have lost control of the informational gates of society. With the advent of social media, large corporations, beholden to the ruling class, no longer have sole domain over reporting what is taking place both domestically and globally.

The ruling class perceives an informed American pubic as a direct threat to their imperialist agenda, thus a concerted drive to regain control of the informational gates by labeling anything that isn’t reported by the propagandists in the mainstream media as “fake news.”

Simply put, Americans have become disillusioned with a system that claims to safeguard people’s rights, but operates in a wholly different manner than what people are indoctrinated into generally believing.

It becomes easier to blame Russia, than to look in the mirror and realize people no longer trust their own governments due to their coming to understand the ominous realities of such things as the massive domestic spying apparatus revealed by Edward Snowden, legalized theft without conviction in the form of civil asset forfeiture,  the legalization of using propaganda meant for foreign audiences on the American public or the ability of the US government to indefinitely detain American citizens, without trial, under the National Defense Authorization Act, etc.

This is why the bash Russia narrative is rife on both sides of political spectrum. When leftist outlets like Attn: are promoting neocon propaganda, it is time to pay attention.

Essentially, the American public has largely come to understand that the United States government, in many instances, operates in a way that is antithetical to the values they have been taught are American. They have become keenly aware that their system is much more reminiscent of an oppressive regime like the Soviet Union, than one based on liberty, justice, and self-determination.

READ MORE:  Lost Interview Reveals Bush"s Plans to Invade Iraq - 2 Years Before 9/11

Moreover, the assertions put forth by Freeman, regarding America “coming under attack by the Russian government,” has never been substantiated — meaning there has been NO evidence ever presented publicly to prove the non-stop allegations of Russian interference. In fact, a Clinton election staffer wrote a book, Shattered, claiming that the “blame Russia” narrative was concocted by Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and Robby Mook in the first 24 hours after her election loss.

Excerpt from Shattered:

“That strategy had been set within twenty-four hours of her concession speech. Mook and Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”

Even leftist intellectual icon, Noam Chomsky called the “Russiagate” hype “little more than a joke.” In fact, he says that this neo-McCarthyist/anti-Russia propaganda degrades one of the positive aspects of the Trump administration – a drive to reduce hostility with rival nuclear power Russia.

During a panel discussion with Chomsky on Democracy Now, one of the panelists referenced Chomsky’s commentary on the Trump/Russia collusion being “a joke,” and asked him,

“Could you give us your view on what’s happening and why there’s so much emphasis on this particular issue?”

Chomsky, the author of more than 100 books, including “Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media,” in which he breaks down how U.S. corporate media has been weaponized as a means of controlling public opinion by propagandizing the American people, didn’t mince his words, noting:

“It’s a pretty remarkable fact that — first of all, it is a joke. Half the world is cracking up in laughter. The United States doesn’t just interfere in elections. It overthrows governments it doesn’t like, institutes military dictatorships.”

“Simply in the case of Russia alone—it’s the least of it—the U.S. government, under Clinton, intervened quite blatantly and openly, then tried to conceal it, to get their man Yeltsin in, in all sorts of ways,” said Chomsky. “So, this, as I say, it’s considered—it’s turning the United States, again, into a laughingstock in the world.”

The problem is that the neocon/neolib alliance, which reveals there is truly only one party — the war party — believes in the neoconservative Project for a New American Century (PNAC) doctrine, which elicits that America’s Cold War victory gives it supreme position as the global leader, and that position must be used to prevent the rise of any potential rival superpower. Hence, why the majority of US military action since the end of the Cold War has been aimed at client states of potential global competitors Russian and China.

READ MORE:  Cheney, Rothschild, and Fox News" Murdoch to Drill for Oil in Syria, Violating International Law

According to Noam Chomsky:

“Control of thought is more important for governments that are free and popular than for despotic and military states. The logic is straightforward: a despotic state can control its domestic enemies by force, but as the state loses this weapon, other devices are required to prevent the ignorant masses from interfering with public affairs, which are none of their business…the public are to be observers, not participants, consumers of ideology as well as products.”

Sadly, a figure like Morgan Freeman has chosen to operate as a tool for the imperialist war party and their insane agenda of escalation with global nuclear powers. Make no mistake that the ultimate goal, as unrealistic as it is, for these warmongers, is to foment regime change in Russia and China, thus solidifying the United States position as the sole hegemonic power in the world.

As journalist Caitlin Johnstone so eloquently puts it:

As viscerally disturbing as it is to see the actor who played God conducting a brazen psy-op on the American people, it is already a well-documented fact that the CIA, the NSA and the Pentagon have been balls deep in Hollywood for decades. They’re just being more blatant about that collaboration now.

Imperialism is the name of the game, and freedom, democracy, and self-determination do not figure into the equation but are simply great talking points to propagandize an unsuspecting public into believing the US’ militaristic adventurism is to better the world.

Shame on Morgan Freeman his unprincipled stand.

Hopefully, history will judge him accordingly if he doesn’t judge himself first and retract this stance.

Please share this story if you find watching Morgan Freeman shill for the imperialist warmongers sickening!

We need the president to tell the truth about Russia. — Morgan Freeman, Investigate Russia

由 ATTN: 发布于 2017年9月19日

Lost Interview Reveals Bush’s Plans to Invade Iraq – 2 Years Before 9/11

As George W. Bush bathed in extraordinarily high approval ratings following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, plans were already being drawn by his war-mongering cabal to use the event to invade Iraq. The few voices of dissent were drowned in an overwhelming, nauseating tide of nationalistic fervor, completely obscuring all sense of reason.

The administration rolled out a propaganda campaign to convince Americans of the need for pre-emptive war in Iraq, creating a rising sense of inevitability—up to the day of “shock and awe.”

By the time enough Americans realized they’d been duped—with the help of mainstream media from The New York Times to Fox News—it was too late. Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and other neocons hailing from the notorious Project for the New American Century (PNAC) had their agenda of military hegemony well underway.

Bush-friendly historians would have you believe the 43^rd President made his decision to invade Iraq after careful deliberation and input from many voices. Those of us paying attention already knew this was a sham, but now we have even more proof that Iraq’s fate was sealed the moment Bush was “elected.”

Advertisment

According to Bush’s former ghostwriter, Mickey Herskowitz, Bush had dreams of invading Iraq two years before 9/11 when he was running for president, and wasn’t afraid to let them be known..

Herskowitz was interviewed by Russ Baker, who reported:

“Two years before the September 11 attacks, presidential candidate George W. Bush was already talking privately about the political benefits of attacking Iraq, according to his former ghost writer, who held many conversations with then-Texas Governor Bush in preparation for a planned autobiography.

“He was thinking about invading Iraq in 1999,” said author and journalist Mickey Herskowitz. “It was on his mind. He said to me: ‘One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief.’ And he said, ‘My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it.’ He said, ‘If I have a chance to invade…if I had that much capital, I’m not going to waste it. I’m going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I’m going to have a successful presidency.” Herskowitz said that Bush expressed frustration at a lifetime as an underachiever in the shadow of an accomplished father. In aggressive military action, he saw the opportunity to emerge from his father’s shadow. The moment, Herskowitz said, came in the wake of the September 11 attacks. “Suddenly, he’s at 91 percent in the polls, and he’d barely crawled out of the bunker.”

The people surrounding Bush had their own visions of grandiosity. They were reportedly in awe over the public adulation of Margaret Thatcher as she maintained British imperialism in the Western Hemisphere. Dick Cheney and the PNAC gang wanted roses thrown at their own feet for conquering the Middle East.

READ MORE:  Cops and Lawmakers Exposed in Massive $800m Private Prison Bribery Conspiracy

Invading easily defeatable countries was seen as an avenue to success as an American leader, which, as Baker notes, was the modus operandi in the Reagan White House, where Cheney was deeply involved.

“Start a small war. Pick a country where there is justification you can jump on, go ahead and invade.”

Making war is, of course, a common theme in almost every administration since World War 2 birthed the military-industrial complex.

Bush couldn’t have done it without the help of Dick Cheney, often likened to Darth Vader for the callousness with which he discusses US-wrought death and destruction. Cheney, who cut his teeth in the Reagan era helping to invade sovereign Latin American countries, brought a horde of neocons and military-industrial complex goons to the Bush administration, many from PNAC.

It just so happens that PNAC sent a letter in 1998 to President Bill Clinton, advocating for regime change in Iraq and urging Clinton to take a more hardline stance. The Cheneys always had close ties to the Bush family, and neocons found their man in George Jr.

Bush’s statements in 1999 to Herskowitz weren’t the only indicator of Bush’s obsession about invading Iraq and removing Saddam. That same year, during a presidential primary, Bush said of Saddam’s purported weapons stash, “I’d take ’em out, take out the weapons of mass destruction-I’m surprised he’s still there.”

Just after the 9/11 attacks. PNAC sent a letter to Bush calling for a “a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq.” Citing the newly crafted ‘war on terror’ justification—giving the president unheard of powers to carry out unilateral military action around the globe and round up “enemy combatants”—PNAC declared that not invading Iraq would be “an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.”

READ MORE:  Conviction Thrown Out For Alleged Cop Killer, "Misplaced" Evidence was Found in Cop"s Garage

To the already informed, it comes as no surprise that Bush always intended to invade Iraq, and 9/11 provided the perfect excuse. Of course, in the American political-corporate establishment, there is no chance Bush will actually be prosecuted for the massive campaign of lies and deception used to lead America into the full-scale invasion of a sovereign Middle Easter country.

The more important point to remember is that the U.S. can easily be led into wars of aggression–potentially far more dangerous than Iraq–by elected presidents and lawmakers completely willing to deceive the public by capitalizing on fear.

Sowing division among the populace is a primary step to the conquering of public perception. Never underestimate the willingness of desperate “leaders” to provoke or contrive an attack in order to overwhelm the movement of peace and liberty.

Inside The US Government's Plan To Survive Nuclear War (While The Rest Of Us Die)

Authored by Sadie Dingfelder, originally posted at The Washington Post,

In 2011, a staffer at Washingtonian found a government ID in a Metro parking garage and gave it to Garrett M. Graff (the magazine’s editor-in-chief at the time) to track down its owner. “Since I reported about that world, he figured I’d know what to do with it,” Graff says.

Graff immediately noticed something strange.

“The back of the ID had these evacuation instructions on it. And so I got on Google Maps and followed the instructions and they led to a road that very clearly went into the side of a mountain, and you can see on the Google satellite view big concrete bunker doors.”

Raven Rock, a hollowed out mountain near the Maryland-Pennsylvania border, is reportedly one of the undisclosed locations Dick Cheney worked from after 9/11.

That discovery inspired Graff to comb through newly declassified documents to learn more about the U.S. government’s plans in the event of a nuclear war or other catastrophe. His research culminated in the new book “Raven Rock: The Story of the U.S. Government’s Secret Plan to Save Itself — While the Rest of Us Die.”

At first, the government didn’t plan to let “the rest of us die.”

“In the early 1950s, the government really hoped and believed it would be able to save most Americans,” Graff says.

As bombs became more destructive, “plans and ambitions gradually shrunk until, realistically, the best they could hope to do is save the senior leadership.”

Drills and disasters have shown that the federal government is too complex and unwieldy to pluck out of D.C. by helicopter and set up in an underground bunker — though that was, and still is, the basic plan, Graff says.

One such shelter is the mountain fortress Graff tracked down: Raven Rock. Here’s more on it, plus other tidbits from doomsday scenarios past and present.

Raven Rock

This compound, carved out of a mountain near the Pennsylvania-Maryland border, contains several freestanding, multistory buildings (on giant, shock-absorbing springs) for a total of 900,000 square feet of office space. It has its own subterranean water supply, too. Raven Rock is where top government and military officials would hide out in the event of a major attack on Washington, D.C.; it was reportedly one of the “undisclosed locations” former Vice President Dick Cheney worked from in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Mount Weather

Another major underground government complex, Mount Weather has been in use since the 1950s. Located at the border of Loudoun and Clarke counties in Virginia, the 600,000-square-foot bunker inside the mountain was once (and still may be) the official evacuation site for Supreme Court justices, documents such as the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, and the National Gallery of Art’s most valuable paintings.

E-4B ‘doomsday planes’

These custom-built 747s, also known as “Air Force One When It Counts,” are flying war rooms that follow the president when he travels internationally.

When POTUS is stateside, one plane sits ready on a runway at a Nebraska military base, “fully staffed with battle planners and war planners and meteorologists and anything else you might need to run a nuclear war,” Graff says. The planes are protected from electromagnetic pulse attacks with a fine wire mesh, and they can unfurl a 5-mile-long wire that allows communication with nuclear submarines.

Survival crackers

In the 1960s, the U.S. government distributed 150 million pounds of wheat crackers and biscuits to fallout shelters across America. Packages are still routinely found unopened in civic building basements, and apparently they don’t taste great. “I did actually find on eBay a box of them, but I haven’t been brave enough to try them in part because I have watched enough YouTube videos of other people trying them to know how disgusting they actually are,” Graff says.

Button #13

In the late 1970s, the D.C. mayor’s emergency control center at 300 Indiana Ave. NW had a Plexiglas-shielded button that, when pressed, triggered “Emer-zak,” the broadcast of emergency messages to lobbies, elevators and anywhere else served by the Muzak system.

*  *  *

While much of this is known, given the recent "Gotham Shield" nuclear attack drill and Washington D.C."s recent "terror attack drill", one can"t help but wonder if these old bunkers and emergency systems are getting dusted off... just as Hawaiian officials have already demanded.

Obsolete Dick Cheney Reemerges Accusing Russia Of Waging “Act of War” Against U.S.!

For years now we’ve witnessed Dick Cheney make seemingly on-scheduled appearances on the corporate mainstream media platform, voicing his opinion as if he is still relevant. This cycle of giving Cheney a voice and pretending like he is still relevant and that we somehow need to know what he thinks, you may have noticed by now is part of a strange and repeating mainstream media script that has been playing out since the Obama years. It’s the deep state’s best attempt at keeping the Bush administration subliminally and indirectly in command. Think about this for a minute.

And so now, approximately 3 months into the Trump presidency we see Cheney up to his old tricks. Right when you think he went away for good the mainstream media needs you to know that Cheney supports the ongoing unsubstantiated and totally fabricated witch hunt known as the “Russia election tampering” operation created from scratch by the Obama CIA in December of 2016 to get everyone’s attention away from (among other things) Obama and Hillary criminality, the now proven fraudulent birth certificate file posted for years on the White House website and the Wikileaks revelations of corruption and criminality now fully revealed to the world coming out of Washington D.C. including child trafficking and pedophilia.

Now is not the time to let political amnesia interfere with your critical thinking skills. Don’t be fooled by the fake news rhetoric coming out of the Liberal Left and the Neocons who are desperately trying to undermine the Trump presidency. This entire “Dick Cheney” theater is just another chapter in their continued failed attempts to demonize Russia and create the same world war 3 scenario that Hillary Clinton, John McCain and others who are lined up with the globalist plans have wanted badly for long.

And what Dick Cheney is saying now should alarm anyone who is paying attention:

“There’s no question there was a very serious effort made by Mr. [Vladimir] Putin and his government, his organization, to interfere in major ways with our basic fundamental democratic processes,” Cheney said Monday during a speech at the Economic Times’ Global Business Summit 2017 in New Delhi.

“In some quarters, that would be considered an act of war. I think it’s a kind of conduct and activity we will see going forward. We know he’s attempted it previously in other states in the Baltics,” Cheney said, according to video of the remarks.

“Another aspect of Mr. Putin’s conduct is the issue that is now very much in the headlines at home, and that has to do with cyber warfare, cyberattack on the United States – the fact that he took his capabilities in the cyber area and used it to try to influence our election,” Cheney said.

What concerns me the most is that as the war hawk Neocons and their Liberal Left partners continue their attempt to undermine Trump’s presidency and restore their new world order plans for world war 3, most if not all Liberal Left “progressives” are so busy hating Trump that they have no idea this agenda is happening right before our eyes. To these brainwashed Liberals I offer the scenario. Imagine if Obama truly wanted a peaceful relation with a certain nation and then imagine other politicians sworn to oppose Obama and undermine him, imagine these politicians were on TV every day calling for war against this country that Obama and his administration doesn’t want war with. What would Obama supporters be thinking? Of course all of this is imaginary as this scenario never happened during the Obama years but it is certainly happening now as the deep state continues to undermine Trump in broad daylight.

I call upon all readers to try to reconfigure your old view of what used be the so-called “Left versus Right” paradigm and see once and for all that it’s all the same. The Right wing Neocons are very close and ideologically inseparable from the war hawk Liberal Left. Furthermore I call upon readers to think of the new paradigm as one of Globalization and the new world order (think Obama’s civilian armies including ISIS, Bush Jr’s mercenary groups (think Blackwater or Academy) and corruption) versus pro-America which involves many in the U.S. military (think of soldiers like Pat Tillman) and others in the deep state who want America to be great and powerful instead of a global government (globalist Leftist plans). In short it’s pro-America versus pro-globalization. This is the new “Right versus Left” that too many people are not quite getting. Once you restructure your paradigm and shed your old view you’ll see and understand events of today much more clearly.

Yes both sides of the deep state want power and perhaps wars but for different reasons. And yes, all wars are evil and wrong and this is why it is up to the people to hold those on either side of the deep state that wage war (whether it’s pro-America or pro-globalization) and commit crimes accountable. In the end it comes down to the rule of law. The same rule of law the Liberal Left and the globalist want to get rid of forever (think Hillary, Podesta, DNC criminality).

And so as long as people fail to see what is really going on, they (the globalists) will continue lying and rolling out their characters (like Cheney) to amuse their hypnotized audience with more deceit, more lies and more propaganda. This is where we are today and I hope that people are seeing the bigger picture for what it is because understanding the bigger picture is the first step toward truly solving the problems that we face today.

RELATED VIDEO

Dick Cheney Says Russian Meddling in American Election Could Be Considered 'An Act of War'

Congratulations democrats! This is the moment in your life when you come to realize you"ve become one and the same as everything you"ve always hated about humanity. You and Dick Cheney, professional neocon war monger, are in agreement that Russia waged war against America this past election, by way of hacking into John Podesta"s email box and then providing that information to Wikileaks to publish and help humiliate an already beleaguered democratic party.

Bear in mind, the black hats in the CIA have yet to actually prove to the American people an actual connection between Wikileaks and the Russian government. The only evidence they"ve publicly provided us with is laughable circumstantial evidence -- backed up and supported by a sundry of unnamed sources deep from within our intelligence apparatus. But we should strongly consider going to war with a super nuclear power -- because strategically -- that"s the best way to end this charade of humanity once and for all.

But here"s Dick Cheney, the man who started it all -- war in the middle east -- which has cost the lives of at least 1.3 million people (some estimate the total deathtoll could be as high as 4 million since the wars began after 9/11). Total treasury expenditure from the American pleb is in excess of $5 trillion -- but it"s probably more. Some might say Dick Cheney is the single worst human to walk the face of the earth since Pol Pot.

Nevertheless, he"s in agreement that Russian"s actions against our "democratic process", one that was overtly rigged against Bernie Sanders, proven in the Wikileaks, was ian act of war. Fall in line little ducks, poor fat little ducks, and sign up your kids to fight in the coming Moscow offensive --  to defend the honor of John "Pizza map" Podesta.

Content originally generated at iBankCoin.com