You Will Be Shocked When You Learn What Planned Parenthood Wants To Teach Preschoolers About Sex

What should we teach children that are three and four years old about sex? If you said “nothing” in response to that question, that was the right answer. Exposing very young children to graphic material about human sexuality at a very early age can be extremely detrimental, but that is precisely what Planned Parenthood wants to do. And I am not just talking about run of the mill sexual education. Planned Parenthood has just released new guidelinesfor educating preschoolers that include entire sections about transgenderism and masturbation. And remember, U.S. taxpayers are paying for all of this, because Planned Parenthood receives about 500 million dollars from the U.S. government every year. The Republicans have control of the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives, and so there is absolutely no excuse for not defunding Planned Parenthood as soon as possible. 

When I first learned about these new guidelines, I was absolutely stunned. Little children that are three and four years old are just learning to put sentences together, and yet Planned Parenthood wants them to start learning about sexuality and gender roles at that age? The following comes from Matt Miller…

New guidelines have been issued on the Planned Parenthood website containing detailed methods for talking to preschoolers about gender roles, sexuality, masturbation, transgenderism, and even ways of determining whether your child is trans or not.

In these new guidelines, there is even a section for parents that are wondering if their little preschooler is transgender. According to Planned Parenthood, parents of a potentially “transgender preschooler” should let them “wear what they want, have the haircut they want, and even use a name that reflects their gender”…

If you think your child might be transgender but don’t know what to do, talking with a counselor or therapist who’s familiar and supportive of LGBTQ identities is a good idea. Talking with other families with trans or gender nonconforming kids can be helpful, too — for both you and your child. There are community groups like PFLAG which may be in your area, and there are also lots of parenting groups online.

It’s also a good idea to talk to your child directly about their gender if you think they might be transgender or gender expansive. Ask them if they’re a boy or a girl, and how they know that to be true. If they are transgender, giving them the power to wear what they want, have the haircut they want, and even use a name that reflects their gender are all going to be really important for them to feel safe, especially once they start going to school. For help talking to your child about this stuff, Gender Spectrum is a good place to start.

This is wrong on so many levels, but if you speak out against these things you might be the one that is branded as a criminal.

In fact, a new law that is moving through the California legislature is so bizarre that it is hard to believe that it is actually real. If you do not use the proper pronoun for transgender senior citizens in California, you could soon be slapped with a huge fine or even be sent to prison. The following comes from Charisma News…

California is on its way to passing a new law that makes it illegal to call transgender senior citizens a pronoun they don’t like. For example, if an elderly person who was born male and lives in a long-term care facility wishes to be called “her” or “she,” the workers there had better do it or face the consequences. The proposed law would even apply to Christian facilities.

SB 219, titled the “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Long-Term Care Facility Resident’s Bill of Rights,” states, “It shall be unlawful for a long-term care facility or facility staff to. … willfully and repeatedly fail to use a resident’s preferred name or pronouns after being clearly informed of the preferred name or pronouns.” It imposes fines and jail time on any long-term care employee who refuses to use transgender pronouns. Fines for repeat offenders could be as high as $1,000 and a jail term of up to a year.

Regardless of what you believe, this is supposed to be a nation that protects free speech.

If you want to stand up against this sort of tyranny, I would encourage you to support my campaign by visiting HelpMichaelWin.com. If I am elected, I promise to fight these kinds of laws as hard as I can.

Already, it is getting to the point where those that believe in traditional values will no longer be able to participate in the wedding industry. For example, a bridal shop in Pennsylvania has been forced to temporarily close its doors because it wouldn’t participate in a gay wedding…

A Christian-owned bridal shop in Pennsylvania has temporarily closed its doors to the public and is now only accepting appointments after its owner received threats because the shop refused to serve a lesbian couple looking for a wedding dress, a source close to the situation told The Christian Post.

This case got national attention, but the owners of the bridal shop have no intention of caving in…

“The owners of W.W. Bridal Boutique reserve the rights afforded to them by the First Amendment of the Constitution to live out our lives according to our faith,” the W.W. Bridal post was quoted as stating. “We will continue to serve our customers based on the tenets of our faith.”

Following the PGN report, nationally recognized left-leaning outlets such as the Huffington Post and Yahoo Style picked up on the article. The shop’s co-owner, Victoria Miller, told the Huffington Post in an email that their refusal was based on a matter of religious beliefs.

Sadly, small businesses such as this one are being slapped with lawsuits all over the nation for not participating in gay weddings, and many small businesses have already been financially ruined by such lawsuits.

If we do not stand up against the forces of political correctness and fight for freedom of speech and freedom of religion, our rights will continually be eroded until they are almost entirely gone.

This is a critical moment in our history, and if we lose this fight the future of our nation will be very bleak indeed.

Why Are Naked Men Being Allowed To Expose Their Bodies In Front Of Young Children During Gay Pride Parades All Over America?

It it okay for naked men to flaunt their completely exposed bodies in front of young children as they march down the street during pride parades? Summer is a time when all sorts of groups hold parades all over America, and even if we disagree with what certain groups have to say they still have a First Amendment right to say it. But nowhere in the U.S. Constitution is there a right to public nudity. Every year completely naked and nearly naked men participate in these parades in cities all over America, and we never hear of anyone getting arrested.

For example, during New York City’s recent annual pride parade many people marched without any clothes on at all…

Hundreds of thousands of people watched marchers in colorful fancy dress – and in some cases no clothes at all – at the Big Apple’s NYC Pride Parade.

Is this legal?

Can we just take our clothes off and march down the street nude in New York City any time we want now?

If not, why weren’t people getting arrested?

Of course out on the west coast things are even worse. During the recent parade in San Francisco, an entire organization known as “the Body Freedom Lovers” proudly marched completely naked…

On this 50th anniversary of the Summer of Love we are proud to march nude in the Gay Pride Parade as the Body Freedom Lovers. We proudly celebrate our bodies as well as the spirit of the 60s that brought us profound spiritual awakenings as well as sexual liberation and body freedom. Just as the gay/bisexual/transgender folks fight for their freedom of choice to do what they please with their own bodies so do we join the same fight to do what we please with our bodies. Not only do we have the right to make love to our lovers in any way we want, we also have the right to dress or undress the way we want. We have no reason to be ashamed of our God-given bodies, just as we have no reason to be ashamed of our God-given desires. We all have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That’s why we demand that the government keep its laws off our bodies! We demand the repeal of the nudity ban that criminalizes the human body in its most natural form. The nudity ban is not only unconstitutional – for it violates our freedom of expression, not only does it go against the Declaration of Independence – for it deprives us of liberty in our pursuit of happiness. The nudity ban goes against the most basic common sense and against nature, our very own human nature.

If they want to march around in their own homes completely naked that is one thing. But at these events there are lots and lots of children. In fact, one mother that was interviewed said that she had been bringing her little daughter to the parade since she was a baby…

“We have been bringing our daughter (now 7) annually since she was a baby,” shares S.F. mom Beth Winegarner. “Yes, there is some nudity and leather but there’s little to no overt sexual stuff as there is at, say, Folsom Street Fair. Kids in general aren’t at all fazed by seeing nudity — after all they like to run around and play with as little on as possible, too.”

Since there is “little to no overt sexual stuff” that somehow makes it okay?

The frightening thing is that this is becoming normalized. Up in Canada, the public is actually given tips on how to prepare their children for what they will see during these events. The following comes from LifeSiteNews…

Last year, Radio Canada offered tips on attending “pride” events with small children. The first bit of guidance is chilling: “Be open-minded. Your kids will probably see boobs and penises. There will be bodies of all shapes, sizes and in all states of undress.”

The sage advice continues, “For parents like Ian Duncan, dad to 3-year-old Carson, this is all part of the appeal. ‘We’re not body shamers,’ he says. ‘It all feeds into my son’s emotional intelligence and sexual development. And it’s never too early to think about that.’”

So why not let everyone walk around completely naked all the time?

Of course the truth is that this is harmful for children, and they instinctively know it. Just consider how one young girl responded to seeing naked men at one of the annual pride parades in Toronto…

Naked men marching in Toronto’s Pride parade, showcasing what supporters cheer on as the advancement of “gay rights” and “sexual liberation.” The naked men march past men, women, and yes even children. Everyone is encouraged to celebrate “diversity.”

Oh, but what’s this? A young girl with blond hair in a turquoise teeshirt knows that something is wrong.

The girl, maybe 8 or 9, doesn’t want to see naked men displaying their genitals. She feels assaulted by what she sees. She implicitly understands that her innocence is threatened by what she sees. She knows something wrong is happening.

She does the most natural thing: She hides her face in her hand to protect herself. She doesn’t want to see the genitals of naked men.

The reason why she covered her eyes was because she knew that she was seeing something that she shouldn’t be seeing.

There is a reason why public nudity has always been against the law, and there is absolutely no reason why anyone needs to march down the street fully undressed.

But this is where our society is going, and that has extremely frightening implications for our future.

Vatican Police ‘Break Up Gay Orgy’ at Home of One of Pope Francis’ Advisors

Vatican police ‘break up gay orgy at home of one of Pope Francis’ advisors (Image: AFP)

The flat belonged to the Holy Office – which is in charge of tackling sexual abuse amongst the clergy.

Vatican police have broken up a gay orgy at the home of the secretary to one of Pope Francis’s key advisers, it has been claimed.

The flat belonged to the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, or Holy Office, which is in charge of tackling sexual abuse amongst the clergy.

Reports in Italy claim the occupant of the apartment is the secretary to Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio – a key aide to the 80-year-old Pope.

Create your own review

Average rating:  

 0 reviews

Rare George Michael Video Resurrected Post-Mortum Shows He Opposed the War Before it Was Cool

Fans, critics, followers, and haters may not know that the late George Michael, UK pop singer who passed away on Christmas Day (2016), was an outspoken anti-war activist. Michael, whose album “Faith” sold 20 million copies, shared his anti-war opinions in an interview with the BBC (2003) just three weeks before the controversial preemptive invasion of Iraq, the contents of which have recently resurfaced.

Speaking with BBC interviewer Tim Sebastian, Michael shared his fears that the U.S. was using the events of 9/11/01 for the purposes of revenge to get back at those who had destroyed the World Trade Center towers. He also targeted former Prime Minister Tony Blair with his criticisms as well. “I’m scared about Mr. Blair and his attitude to the future….September 11^th was so obviously directed at America to provoke a response, and the response was supposed to be revenge,” he said. Michael intimated that the UN coalition against Saddam Hussein was simply a delayed “knee-jerk” reaction, something he considered “pointless.”

Michael, who initially supported and voted for Blair, lost faith in the man after the singer says he “removed idealism from politics”.  Michael stated to go to war with Iraq wasn’t a Christian action to take. “This is not ethical is it? This is a Christian country, with supposedly a Christian leader who somehow thinks the answer to the future is preemptive action,” against Hussein, something Michael likened to the creation of the atomic bomb. Michael told Sebastian that Blair was “bullying the UN” by saying the “UN needs to prove its relevance”, a supposed quote Blair made of the UN.

Michael said he supported Blair until the public simply disagreed with the former prime minister. “I want somebody who leads on his convictions until 90 percent of the public disagrees with him,” he said when asked by Sebastian what kind of Prime Minister Michael would want. Going further Michael said, “You’re not paid to put people’s lives in danger and ignore their opinion on that very subject. No one is paid to do that,” he said remarking the majority consensus in the UK was against the preemptive war against Iraq. “You cannot do this at the moment when the entire fundamentalist terrorist network around the world is waiting for this to legitimize what they want to do,” Michael said sounding a lot like others who said the terrorists were simply attempting to draw major world powers into their idealistic jihadi struggle.

READ MORE:  BOMBSHELL: Declassified Memo Proves the Pentagon had ZERO Evidence of WMDs in Iraq

Sebastian questioned whether or not Michael wanted a serious debate on the subject. Michael responded by saying that was precisely the reason why he wrote the song “Shoot The Dog” and created the animated music video. All he said was done to use humor to be able to engage in conversation about the misguided motives for war in the Middle East. Michael denied his actions were “anti-war” but rather done with the intention to bring the subject “into the mainstream” conversation.

Michael said his lightbulb moment occurred when he was “absolutely aware” after he watched President George W. Bush speaking from Capitol Hill on 9/11/02 when the World Cup was being played and everyone breathed a sigh of relief that no more attacks had taken place. Michael apparently knew he had to speak out against such preemptive attacks and plans for revenge in Arab countries.

When the musician turned activist did eventually come out and speak out against Blair, Bush, the planned Gulf War II, he also got criticized, as Sebastian mentioned, by other musicians. Noel Gallagher, (UK musician) was quoted by the BBC interviewer as saying, “George is now trying to make social comment. This is the guy who hid who he actually was from the public for 20 years. Now all of a sudden he’s going to say something about the world. I find it laughable. That’s before you get to the song (Shoot the Dog) which is diabolical.”

Michael responded by defending his sexual preferences as well as his rights to think for himself. He said, “I think that’s a laughable statement. What the fact that I did not want to share my sexuality with the world in this current media atmosphere…the fact that I did not want to share my sexuality with the world means that I have no right to talk about politics?”

READ MORE:  5 Times Corporate Media Got Caught Publishing Fake News Causing the Death & Suffering of Millions

Michael then called Gallagher an unintelligent man and said his criticisms were lacking credibility. “He’s not someone you should throw quotes at me from really,” but added if they really wanted to get better source criticisms they wouldn’t have to look far. Michael stated Rupert Murdoch, owner of FOX, had repeatedly attacked Michael on a number of occasions, across continents, and in various FOX owned newspaper outlets. “Mr. Murdoch attacked me solidly on SkyNews, in The New York Post, and in The Sun. And what he would do would be he would print these slurs in the New York Post in such a way that when they reprinted them in The Sun…I could only sue on the basis of it being reprinted from the American Source,” a source which was protected by the Freedom of Speech made much harder to sue. Michael said he was upset being called a “pervert” simply for getting caught “cruising” (looking for a sexual partner).

Michael said of his anti-war activism, “This is something that threatens the lives and the lifestyle of people I love. This is a lot more important that trying to discourage people from taking drugs and telling them that they really should pay for their CDs.”

In what is now over a decade old interview, Michael stated the American media was in collusion with the Bush administration to conceal from the American people, facts related to the preemptive strike against Iraq. He said Americans are, “not anywhere nearly as informed by their media as we are.” Michael called for pause in dealing with Saddam Hussein, and for coalition countries to not take action. He also stated that citizens of the UK really did not want a war in their own homeland and said, “I honestly think that the majority of British people have no idea what we’re doing here, on our own with the Americans.”

READ MORE:  Highest-Ranking US Intelligence Officer Openly Admits ISIS Wouldn"t Exist if Not for "Dumb" US War

Of course, history would show that Michael’s comments against the coalition’s invasion of Iraq in 2003 fell on deaf ears. The U.S. invaded Iraq, conquered the Iraqi army killing thousands in the process, removed Saddam Hussein, and touched off a civil war both in Iraq and Afghanistan. The conflict gave rise to millions of jihadi motivated individuals, and when Barack H. Obama encouraged the Arab Spring, Islamic revolutions commenced in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Qatar, and Syria, resulting in the millions strong mass migration of displaced refugees. Who knew one act of retaliation would have created so much chaos? Apparently, George Michael did. Rest in peace George.