Showing posts with label dna test. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dna test. Show all posts

Friday, July 21, 2017

Man Facing Jail for Not Paying Child Support For A Child DNA Proves is NOT His

dna


A court in Houston, Texas, is forcing a father to pay nearly $65,000 in child support payments for a daughter he has only met once—who is actually not his child, according to a DNA test.


Gabriel Cornejo has found himself embroiled in a legal battle after an ex-girlfriend informed him that he has a daughter who is now 16 years old. However, after meeting the girl once, Cornejo told ABC 13 that he pursued a DNA test, and learned that he is not her father.


“I never thought in my whole life I would have to defend myself or something that I am innocent of,” Cornejo said, noting that he is already raising three children of his own, along with two of his brother’s children.


Texas state law punishes nonpayment of child support harder than most. According to the Child Support Division at the Attorney Generals’ Office, Cornejo could be extorted and thrown in prison for failing to pay for a child that is not his. The AG’s office enforces child support through the following ways:


Advertisment



  • Requiring that the employer of the deadbeat dad deduct the child support from his paycheck by withholding the amount from his wages.

  • Intercepting lottery winnings, tax refund checks or any other money that is due from state or federal government sources.

  • Filing liens against property or assets owned by the deadbeat dad.

  • Suspending driver’s, professional or hunting licenses. Laws dealing with child support in Texas state that deadbeat dads who owe more than three months of past-due child support, and who do not have a voluntary repayment schedule, face mandatory license suspension. Usually the individual will initially be given a warning and an opportunity to remedy the situation prior to suspension.

  • Filing a lawsuit against the deadbeat dad and asking a court to enforce the order.

  • Sentencing the delinquent parent to jail time and entering a judgment in the amount of past due child support.


READ MORE:  Irony? Court Violates Cop"s Free Speech, Ruling that His License Plate Can"t Say "OINK"



The child support payments were reportedly mandated after Cornejo’s ex-girlfriend went to court in 2003, and claimed that Cornejo was the only possible father. While the court records suggest Cornejo was sent a subpoena, he claimed he never received one, and he never appeared in court.


As a result, the court issued a default judgment holding Cornejo responsible for 18 years’ worth of child support, which has totaled nearly $65,000 thus far.



A similar case occurred in 1992, when a man named Johnnie Morales appealed a default judgment from the Texas Attorney General that declared him the father of a child, and ordered him to pay child support payments. After Morales denied paternity and refused to submit to a court-ordered DNA test, the court pursued “additional evidence from the mother about Morales’s paternity and financial ability, rendered a default paternity judgment.”


However, in Cornejo’s case, because he never went to court, he claims the default judgment was issued without his knowledge. Carel Stith, the lawyer representing Cornejo’s ex-girlfriend, told ABC 13 that “child support was taken from Cornejo’s paycheck long ago,” and he never fought it.


In contrast, Cornejo’s lawyer Cheryl Coleman insisted, “They say he should have fought back then and he failed to do so. But how can you fight something you don’t know anything about?”



Now, Cornejo is seeking to appeal to a judge to reopen the case. Otherwise, he faces either $65,000 in payments or time in jail under the 2003 court order. He is set to appear in court in August.


As The Free Thought Project has reported, the theme of men facing jail time for failing to pay child support—even when DNA tests prove they are not the fathers of the children in question—is nothing new. In January 2015, Carnell Alexander was facing the same verdict from a court in Detroit.



READ MORE:  LAPD Sets Up Elaborate Sting Operation to Arrest a Man for Selling a $5 Leather Bracelet



Despite the fact that a DNA test proved her was not the father of the child in question, the state declared him the father, and claimed that he owed $30,000 in back child support, based off of the fact that the child’s mother used Alexander’s name on welfare paperwork.


After reports on Alexander’s case garnered massive attention, Attorney Cherika Harris agreed to take on his case. As the suit moved forward, ABC 7 reported that Wayne County dismissed the child support case against Alexander, and he received official notice in December 2016 that he does not owe child support for a child that is not his.

Monday, March 27, 2017

Subway Sues TV Network over Report that its Chicken is 50% Soy

The Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC) recently reported that a DNA test of Subway’s chicken conducted by Trent University in Ontario revealed that the product was made up of approximately 50% soy filler, and the sandwich chain isn’t taking it lying down. The company has decided to file a huge lawsuit against the news network. [1]


A Subway spokesperson said in a statement:


“We have issued a Notice of Action in Canada against the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation that asks for $210 million in damages over allegations made by its program, ‘Marketplace,’ that are defamatory and absolutely false.


Despite our efforts to share the facts with the CBC about the high quality of our chicken and to express our strong objections to their inaccurate claims, they have not issued a retraction, as we requested.” [1]


Source: Kawartha NOW

The segment that aired on February 24, 2017 reported that the DNA test of Subway’s chicken showed that its oven-roasted chicken contained 53.6% chicken and that its chicken strips contained 42.8% poultry. [2]


Subway said in its statement:


“Test results from laboratories in Canada and the US clearly show that the Canadian chicken products tested had only trace amounts of soy, contradicting the accusations made during the broadcast of ‘CBC Marketplace."” [1]




It went on to say:

“Our chicken is 100% white meat with seasonings, marinated and delivered to our stores as a finished, cooked product. We have advised them [CBC] of our strong objections. We do not know how they produced such unreliable and factually incorrect data, but we are insisting on a full retraction. Producing high quality food for our customers is our highest priority. This report is wrong and it must be corrected.” [1]


Read: Subway Removes Harmful Bread Additive Due to Blogger Petition Pressure


Subway franchisee Bob Grewal, who oversees Subway restaurants in Canada near where the DNA-tested chicken was sold, claims that Trent University told Subway officials that “the CBC twisted all the facts.” [2]


However, the president of Trent University, Leo Groarke, is standing by the results. He said in a statement:


“At Trent we are proud to champion independent research. Defending good science is one of the key roles of universities in society. We are proud of the work of our Wildlife Forensic DNA Laboratory, its faculty and staff. It is important to stand up for sound scientific findings, particularly when they are unpopular.” [3]


The CBC is standing by the findings as well and said:


“We believe our journalism to be sound and there is no evidence that we’ve seen that would lead us to change our position.” [2]


Source: RTT News

Grewal also said that the CBC called Subway 2 weeks before the segment and “asked us a very specific question about the soy content in our food’’ – namely, what the percentage was. However, the CBC failed to inform Subway that it had been conducting DNA tests and taste tests with customers, according to Grewal.


He said:


“The fact is these guys sideswiped us. This was purposely done to drive ratings.” [2]


A week after the February 24 report was broadcast, Subway published a rebuttal, saying that it had two independent labs test its chicken – one in the U.S. and one in Canada – and both found only trace amounts of soy. [1]


Sources:


[1] Business Insider


[2] The New York Post


[3] The Peterborough Examiner


Kawartha Now


RTT News (featured image source)





Storable Food


About Julie Fidler:


Author Image
Julie Fidler is a freelance writer, legal blogger, and the author of Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or the Absolute Worst. She lives in Pennsylvania with her husband and two ridiculously spoiled cats. She occasionally pontificates on her blog.