Grand Jury Investigated Hillary

(image: Reuters/Adrees Latif)

According to Judicial Watch (JW), newly released State Department documents revealed she “was the subject of a grand jury investigation related to her BlackBerry email accounts.”

Released information followed JW’s lawsuit, “seeking to force Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to take steps to ‘recover emails of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’ “ – along with those of other State Department employees.

JW’s lawsuit was initially filed against John Kerry. “The Trump State Department filing includes details of the agency’s continuing refusal to refer the Clinton email issue to the Justice Department, as the law requires,” JW explained.

Its lawsuit was dismissed at the district court level, revived on appeal by a US District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on December 27, 2016.

As secretary of state, Hillary improperly used her unsecured email server and accounts for official government business. So did her top aides and advisors.

JW president Tom Fitton issued a statement, saying “(t)he FBI convened a grand jury to investigate Hillary Clinton in 2016. Why is this information being released only now?”

It’s “disturbing that the State Department, Justice Department and FBI are still trying to protect Hillary Clinton. President Trump needs to clean house at all these agencies.”

Separately, JW sued to obtain records showing US government funding of George Soros’ Open Society Foundation, saying:

One reason he’s so politically active is because “he is handed a lot of our tax dollars to fund his (destructive) activities.”

He’s gotten millions of USAID dollars. JW sued because the State Department and the agency ignored its February 2017 request, seeking “records (and communications) related to any grants, contracts, or disbursements of funds by the State Department” and USAID to Soros.

In February, JW’s Corruption Chronicles said Washington “quietly spent millions of taxpayer dollars to destabilize the democratically elected, center-right government in Macedonia by colluding with…billionaire…George Soros, records obtained by Judicial Watch show.”

Barack Obama’s US Ambassador to Macedonia, Jess L. Baily, has worked behind the scenes with Soros’ Open Society Foundation to funnel large sums of American dollars for the cause, constituting an interference of the US Ambassador in (the country’s) domestic political affairs in violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.”

“It’s clear from what we have already learned that the Obama administration freely used our tax dollars for political purposes, including support of the Soros operation.”

Trump’s State Department and USAID operate the same way in multiple countries, violating international law – US taxpayers none the wiser.

‘Al-Qaeda is On Our Side in Syria’ — Email Shows Clinton Knew US Worked With Terrorists

Jacob Jeremiah Sullivan is an American policymaker and a senior policy advisor to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 election campaign, who’s been seemingly attached to Clinton’s hip for nearly a decade.

Sullivan was widely rumored to be a front-runner for the position of U.S. National Security Advisor under a Hillary Clinton administration before she lost to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election. He was also Deputy Assistant to the U.S. President Barack Obama and National Security Advisor to U.S. Vice President Joe Biden.

He also served as the Director of Policy Planning at the U.S. Department of State, and as Deputy Chief of Staff to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. He was deputy policy director for Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential primary campaign and a member of the debate preparation team for Barack Obama’s general election campaign. 

For all intents and purposes, it is safe to call Sullivan a well-connected D.C. insider.

Now, according to a recently discovered email from WikiLeaks, he knew the US was working alongside Al-Qaeda in Syria — and, by proxy, so did then-Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.

While it may come as no surprise, to those who’ve been paying attention, that the US has been arming and supporting terrorists in Syria, this email, confirming Clinton’s knowledge of it prior to Obama’s ‘red line’ in 2013, is nothing short of bombshell.

While the United States admittedly gave supplies to the ‘rebels’ as early as 2011, these supplies were all non-lethal, meaning they came in the form of food, trucks, and other rations. However, through covert lines, the CIA quickly began to dump cash, weapons, and eventually heavy artillery into the hands of the ‘moderate rebels’ over the course of the next few years.

What this email shows is that the US knew Al-Qaeda leader al-Zawahiri called on Muslims in Turkey and the Middle East to aid the rebels in the Free Syrian Army. From this day forward, the lines between who Al-Qaeda or the ‘rebels’ actually were — became heavily blurred. But, according to the email, the state department did not care as they knew Al-Qaeda was on their side.

As the email states:

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05789138 Date: 10/30/2015 AL-ZAWAHIRI URGES MUSLIM SUPPORT FOR OPPOSITION (U) Al-Qaida leader al-Zawahiri called on Muslims in Turkey and the Middle East to aid rebel forces in their fight against supporters of Syrian President Asad in an interne video recording. Al-Zawahiri also urged the Syrian people not to rely on the AL, Turkey, or the United States for assistance.euters)

Once this wire went out to multiple departments in the form of an Ops Alert, apparently there may have been some original concern about Al-Qaeda joining the ranks of the US-supported rebels — which were being used by the American Deep State to destabilize Syria on behalf of special interests. However, Sullivan quickly replied to his master, Hillary Clinton, to let her know that Al-Qaeda “is on our side in Syria.”

This email adds credence to the claims of Rep. Tulsi Gabbard — who was forced to take action to stop the US/ISIS collusion in Syria — by proposing a bill to “Stop Arming the Terrorists.” Last month, Gabbard called on President Trump to “end the regime change in Syria,” adding that this is what is causing the refugee crisis. While some were hopeful that Trump may comply, after last week, all hope was lost.

“For years, our government has been providing both direct and indirect support to these armed militant groups, who are working directly with or under the command of terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, all in their effort and fight to overthrow the Syrian government,” Gabbard said in an interview last month.

Shortly after Gabbard proposed this monumental legislation, she received bipartisan support from Sen. Rand Paul. Paul, a Republican, and Gabbard, a Democrat, have symbolically joined hands in calling on the federal government to be more accountable with how and to whom it gives money and material support.

The S. 532, the Stop Arming Terrorists Act, “Makes it illegal for any U.S. federal government funds to be used to provide assistance covered in the bill, including weapons, munitions, weapons platforms, intelligence, logistics, training, and cash, to terrorists.”

Going further, the bill, “Prohibits the U.S. government from providing such assistance covered in the bill to any nation that has given or continues to give such support to terrorists.”

Whether or not this bill will actually pass, or whether or not Trump will veto it after its passage, remains a mystery.

However, thanks to WikiLeaks, US citizens now have a far clearer picture of what is going on, and who exactly, is supporting whom in Syria.

Will Michelle Obama Be The Replacement Nominee If The FBI Email Investigation Ends Hillary Clinton’s Campaign?

“And I certainly hope that Michelle Obama does not become the nominee if Hillary Clinton has to step aside, because Donald Trump would have an exceedingly difficult time defeating her.”

I realize that this headline must sound extremely bizarre, but in this article I will explain why this could actually happen. We have just learned that the FBI has obtained a search warrant that will enable the agency to examine approximately 650,000 emails that are sitting on electronic devices owned by Huma Abedin and her estranged husband Anthony Weiner. Now that the FBI is going through these emails, it is unlikely but still possible that a decision about whether or not to charge Hillary Clinton with a crime could be made by November 8th. Of course the most likely scenario is that Hillary Clinton will not be indicted before election day and that Americans will be voting with this scandal hanging ominously over the Clinton campaign. But if the FBI does quickly take action, it is possible that Hillary Clinton could be forced from the race before election day, and that would require the Democrats to come up with a new candidate.

In fact, there are already calls in the mainstream media for Clinton to willingly remove herself from the race. For example, the following comes from a Chicago Tribune article entitled “Democrats should ask Clinton to step aside“…

So what should the Democrats do now?

If ruling Democrats hold themselves to the high moral standards they impose on the people they govern, they would follow a simple process:

They would demand that Mrs. Clinton step down, immediately, and let her vice presidential nominee, Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, stand in her place.

Democrats should say, honestly, that with a new criminal investigation going on into events around her home-brew email server from the time she was secretary of state, having Clinton anywhere near the White House is just not a good idea.

But what the author of that article does not understand is that Tim Kaine would not automatically take her place if Clinton steps down before the election. In a previous article, I included a quote from a U.S. News & World Report article that explained what would happen if Hillary Clinton was removed from the Democratic ticket for some reason prior to November 8th…

If Clinton were to fall off the ticket, Democratic National Committee members would gather to vote on a replacement. DNC members acted as superdelegates during this year’s primary and overwhelmingly backed Clinton over boat-rocking socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

DNC spokesman Mark Paustenbach says there currently are 445 committee members – a number that changes over time and is guided by the group’s bylaws, which give membership to specific officeholders and party leaders and hold 200 spots for selection by states, along with an optional 75 slots DNC members can choose to fill.

But the party rules for replacing a presidential nominee merely specify that a majority of members must be present at a special meeting called by the committee chairman. The meeting would follow procedures set by the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee and proxy voting would not be allowed.

So if this email scandal forced Hillary Clinton to exit the race at the last minute, a majority of the members of the Democratic National Committee would gather to select a new nominee.

Who would they choose?

Let’s take a look at the top five options…

#1 Tim Kaine

He would seem to be an obvious choice since he is Hillary Clinton’s running mate. But to win a national campaign you need to have name recognition, and most Americans outside of the state of Virginia have very little familiarity with him.

And at this point he has proven to have very little popularity on the campaign trail. In fact, attendance at many of his rallies in key swing states can be measured in the dozens.

So to me it seems unlikely that the DNC would select Kaine as the replacement nominee.

#2 Joe Biden

Vice-President Joe Biden has far more name recognition than Tim Kaine does, and in recent days he has been touting how he believes that he would have actually won the nomination if he would have decided to run…

Vice President Joe Biden said in a recent interview that he believed he could have beat former secretary of state Hillary Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination had he pursued it.

Biden was asked in an interview with CNN Saturday if news that the FBI was re-opening their criminal probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state made him second-guess his decision last year not to run.

But according to the vice president, the short answer is “no.” The only thing that kept him from running, Biden said, was the recent death of his son, Beau.

Unfortunately for Biden, he suffers from many of the same things that Kaine does.

Biden is boring, he is not very good on the campaign trail, and he doesn’t have the sort of charisma that would motivate people to go to the polls in large numbers.

Biden would probably represent the “safest” choice for the Democrats, but he might not be a winning choice.

#3 Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders would seem to be a logical choice since he was the runner-up to Hillary Clinton, but the truth is that there are a lot of things working against Bernie Sanders.

First of all, he does not have any real loyalty to the Democrats. He has previously operated as an independent, and he expressed a desire to return to independent status once the campaign was over.

Secondly, the Democratic establishment very much dislikes him, and that plays a huge role in decisions such as this.

Thirdly, Democratic insiders fear that he would be “another McGovern” and would get absolutely wiped out in a general election.

So even though he is very popular with the radical left, it appears that Sanders would be the least likely choice on this list.

#4 Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth Warren would be very popular with the “Bernie Sanders” wing of the party, and she would enable the party to replace Hillary Clinton with another woman.

So she is definitely a possibility.

But she does lack name recognition, and just like Sanders there would be concern that the Republicans would frame her candidacy as “another McGovern” because of her far left policies.

#5 Michelle Obama

One recent survey found that 67 percent of all Democrats would rather have a third term for Obama than a first term for Hillary Clinton.

And these days Barack Obama’s approval rating is running anywhere from +9 to +11.

So the thought of another Obama in the White House is not as far-fetched as you might think.

Michelle Obama has better name recognition than anyone else on this list, and she is generally very well-liked by the American people. And she has received a tremendous amount of praise for her work on the campaign trail recently. For instance, her recent speech in New Hampshire was lauded as “the most influential speech of the 2016 campaign” in a recent MSN article entitled “In this campaign, Michelle Obama became more than just another political voice“…

The speech, amplified by timing and met with an enthusiastic response, cemented Obama’s place as a star of the presidential race and put a defining stroke not just on how women view Trump, but also on herself as a voice of moral authority. Three months before leaving the White House, she already is among the ranks of public figures who transcend politics and title.

“When you rise to a level like that, you see how much weight your words carry,” said Anita McBride, former chief of staff to Laura Bush and executive in residence at the School of Public Affairs at American University. “We know she didn’t like politics. But she was impassioned by the language that was used, and she feels compelled to speak out. People listen to her.”

If I were the Democrats, Michelle Obama is the one that I would select if a replacement nominee was needed, because she would give them the very best chance of winning against Donald Trump.

Of course the Obamas are just as radical as Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, but the American people have become quite comfortable with them at this point.

And I certainly hope that Michelle Obama does not become the nominee if Hillary Clinton has to step aside, because Donald Trump would have an exceedingly difficult time defeating her.

In the final analysis, none of this is probably going to matter anyway because it is unlikely that the FBI will move quickly enough to force Hillary Clinton out before election day, but there is still a small chance that it could actually happen.

And if it does happen, it is going to turn politics in America completely upside down.

21 Things We’ve Learned About Hillary Clinton From Wikileaks That The MSM Won’t Share…But YOU Can!

Let’s talk about Wikileaks.

First of all, the organization was founded by Julian Assange back in 2006. Their website explains what they are all about:

“WikiLeaks specializes in the analysis and publication of large datasets of censored or otherwise restricted official materials involving war, spying, and corruption. It has so far published more than 10 million documents and associated analyses.”

In the 11 years that they’ve been publishing documents, they have not been disproven a single time. Their record for authentication is perfect. (Learn more here and here.)

So this means that a person would be pretty silly to disregard anything in the reams of information about Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Party, the Clinton Foundation, and the political shenanigans that would put the Machiavellis to shame.

Here are 21 of the most important things that have come out about Hillary Clinton, that unfortunately, no one is reporting on in the mainstream.  In the interest of brevity, each topic has a link to an article that goes deeper into the leak. (In no particular order.)

1. John Podesta, the chairman of the Clinton campaign had a nice cozy dinner with Peter Kadzik, one of the top officials in the Department of Justice…the day after the Benghazi hearing. Kadzik’s son also asked for a job on the Clinton campaign, and, the icing on the corruption cupcake? Kadzik led the effort to nominate Loretta Lynch, who famously met with Bill Clinton on her private plane right before Hillary’s interrogation about Emailgate. (source)


2. We all knew that the Clinton Foundation was just a way for the Clinton family to launder money, and now there’s proof. Zero Hedge writes, “…today’s Wikileaks dump included that memo which reveals, for the first time, the precise financial flows between the Clinton Foundation, Band’s firm Teneo Consulting, and the Clinton family’s private business endeavors.” A pundit called this leak “The Rosetta Stone of the Clinton Foundation,” meaning that with this document, all of their shady financial dealings could be unraveled and translated. (source)


3. Clinton is unable to speak for very long without a podium to lean on. Numerous leaked emails reference how certain interviews have to be kept short because she’d be without one. And this article references a very interesting reason why this may be the case – surprisingly it isn’t related to her health. (source)


4. The leaks also show that Clinton intends to do her best to restrict the Second Amendment. Brian Fallon, the national press secretary for the Clinton campaign, wrote, “Circling back around on guns as a follow up to the Friday morning discussion: the Today show has indicated they definitely plan to ask bout guns, and so to have the discussion be more of a news event than her previous times discussing guns, we are going to background reporters tonight on a few of the specific proposals she would support as President – universal background checks of course, but also closing the gun show loophole by executive order and imposing manufacturer liability.” According to an analysis on The Daily Sheeple, “Imposing manufacturer liability means that after Sandy Hook, Bushmaster and Remington Arms would have been prosecuted for having a hand in the murder of children and school staff members for firearms that were legally sold.” (source)


5. The campaign was concerned that the sexual escapades of Bill Clinton could be likened to those of another disgraced celebrity, Bill Cosby.  Political operative Ron Klain sent an urgent email saying that Hillary should anticipate the following questions, ” How is what Bill Clinton did different from what Bill Cosby did? Is his conduct relevant to your campaign? You said every woman should be believed. Why not the women who accused him? Will you apologize to the women who were wrongly smeared by your husband and his allies?” (source)


6. Clinton’s campaign deliberately leaked an embarrassing photo of  a swimsuit-clad Bernie Sanders to the press, ironically insinuating that it was proof he was bought off by Wall Street. Perez Hilton wrote, “Bernie Sanders lounges at elite Martha’s Vineyard pool, summer 2015 after helping raise money from Wall Street lobbyists.” (source)


7. Clinton admitted she is out of touch with the middle class in a speech to Goldman-Black Rock in 2014. “And I am not taking a position on any policy, but I do think there is a growing sense of anxiety and even anger in the country over the feeling that the game is rigged. And I never had that feeling when I was growing up. Never. I mean, were there really rich people, of course there were. My father loved to complain about big business and big government, but we had a solid middle class upbringing. We had good public schools. We had accessible health care. We had our little, you know, one-family house that, you know, he saved up his money, didn’t believe in mortgages. So I lived that. And now, obviously, I’m kind of far removed because the life I’ve lived and the economic, you know, fortunes that my husband and I now enjoy, but I haven’t forgotten it.” (source)


8. She made this rather NWO remark at a 2013 paid speech to Brazilian bank Banco Itau:  “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.” (source)


9. In a leak of yet another paid speech, this time to the  Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago in 2013, Clinton said that Jordan and Turkey “can’t possibly vet all those refugees so they don’t know if, you know, jihadists are coming in along with legitimate refugees.” Meanwhile, if Clinton has her way, we will be warmly welcoming 65,000 refugees a year, which makes Obama’s 10,000 a year look like small potatoes. (source)


10. Clinton blackmailed the Chinese by telling them that the US would base missiles in the region if they didn’t exert some control over North Korean  aggression. “So China, come on. You either control them or we’re going to have to defend against them,” she purportedly told the audience at a Goldman Sachs conference in June 2013. (source)


11. In May 2015, Clinton was no longer Secretary of State but was ready to announce she was running for President when she was invited to attend a summit in Morrocco.  The implication from the leaked emails was that a $12 million “donation” from the king of Morocco was dependent on Clinton attending the summit. Human Abedin, usually loyal to her boss, had concerns. “If HRC was not part of it, meeting was a non-starter. She created this mess and she knows it. Her presence was a condition for the Moroccans to proceed so there is no going back on this,” Abedin wrote to  Robbie Mook in a November 2014 email. Incidentally, Clinton didn’t attend. Bill and Chelsea went instead and the $12 million donation was not forthcoming. (source)


12. Podesta attacked Clinton’s primary election rival Bernie Sanders for criticizing the Paris climate change agreement. “Can you believe that doofus Bernie attacked it?” said Podesta. (source)


13. Clinton told a Goldman Sachs conference she would like to intervene secretly in Syria. “My view was you intervene as covertly as is possible for Americans to intervene,” she told employees of the bank in South Carolina, which had paid her about $225,000 to give a speech. “We used to be much better at this than we are now. Now, you know, everybody can’t help themselves. They have to go out and tell their friendly reporters and somebody else: Look what we’re doing and I want credit for it.” (source)


14. There is indeed a definite link between the Clinton campaign and what MSM is allowed to say. The campaign has colluded directly with media spokespersons that read like a Who’s Who in American Media: Dan Merica from CNN, Haim Saban of Univision, John Harwood of CNBC and the NY Times, Rebecca Quick of CNBC, Maggie Haberman of NY Times and Politico, John Harris of Politico, Donna Brazile formerly of CNN, Roland Martin of TV-One, Marjorie Pritchard of The Boston Globe, and Louise Mensch of Heat Street. (source)


15. As everyone knows, the DNC deliberately screwed Bernie Sanders out of the nomination (Bonus: Wikileaks also released some of the DNC’s voicemails on the topic).


16. There are emails that prove who is actually pulling HRC’s puppet strings and that puppeteer is George Soros. The shadow government is not just a conspiracy theory – it really exists and Hillary’s job is to keep George Soros happy. (source)


17. Excerpts from her speeches to Wall Street read like a guide to two-faced treachery. In them, she clearly points out that sometimes you “need” to lie. “If everybody’s watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position.”  (source)


18. Wikileaks emails show that back when she still worked for CNN and before she became an employee of the Clinton campaign, Donna Brazile gave Hillary the questions in advance for her “impromptu” CNN Town Hall questions. (source)


19. The campaign got to “approve” articles in influential publications like NY Times, HuffPo, CNN, NBC, CBS, NYT, MSNBC, and Politico, showing a massive collusion with the mainstream media, who has hounded Trump relentlessly in an effort to distract from HRC’s abysmal candidacy. (source)


20. Through the treasure trove of Wikileaks emails, we can gain an accurate picture of how Hillary really feels about us all (spoiler: basket of deplorables, basement dwellers and right wing conspirators) (source)


21. President Obama knew the whole time that her emails were not coming from the secure State Department server. Cheryl Mills wrote to John Podesta, “We need to clean this up – he has emails from her – they do not say state.gov.” You see, Obama’s emails all have to be from”whitelisted”addresses. So someone, somewhere, added her nonsecure email to his whitelist. (source)

And finally, here’s the real reason that treacherous shrew is involved in politics. And let me tell you, it isn’t because she yearns to make things better for anyone but herself. (emphasis mine.)

At the Goldman Sachs Builders and Innovators Summit, Clinton responded to a question from chief executive Lloyd Blankfein, who quipped that you “go to Washington” to “make a small fortune.” Clinton agreed with the comment and complained about ethics rules that require officials to divest from certain assets before entering government. “There is such a bias against people who have led successful and/or complicated lives,” Clinton said. (source)

Together, we cannot be ignored.

I am on a mission between now and the Presidential Election on November 8th and I hope that you will join me.

I am going to work day and night to provide the coverage that the mainstream media is not. It isn’t until we combine all of our voices that we can make people listen to the scandals, the rigging, and the corruption, not only in this election but in the system in general. Please join your voice with mine by liking, sharing, and spreading the word.

Together, we cannot be ignored. Together, we are an army.

Bill And Hillary Clinton, Inc.: For Sale At The Right Price

(image credit: Getty)

After announcing her presidential bid last year, Hillary tried getting Moroccan King Mohammed VI to donate $12 million to the Clinton Foundation in return for a face-to-face meeting and speaking engagement.

Nice work if you can get it. Easy if you’re Bill or Hillary Clinton, money from Morocco’s king one of many examples of their corrupt practices.

Reporting on email content revealed by WikiLeaks, Fox News Ed Henry, said the following:

“Just hours after Hillary Clinton dodged a question at the final presidential debate about charges of ‘pay to play’ at the Clinton Foundation, a new batch of WikiLeaks emails surfaced with stunning charges that the candidate herself was at the center of negotiating a $12 million commitment from King Mohammed VI of Morocco.”

In an email to Hillary’s campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign manager Robby Mook, close Hillary aide Huma Abedin said “this was HRC’s idea.”

“She created this mess and she knows it” – referring to scheduling a pay-to-play deal one month after launching her presidential bid, certain to raise red flags if revealed.

Her advisors were concerned. Abedin emailed “(j)ust to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting (of the Clinton Global Initiative) was her participation. If hrc was not part of it, meeting was a non-starter.”

“This was HRC’s idea. Our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting.”

A compromise was reached. Bill and Chelsea participated, representing Hillary. Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace pressed Robby Mook for an explanation.

Wallace: “Why wasn’t that classic pay-to-play,” he asked?

Mook: “There’s nothing new here” – only in terms of it being commonplace Bill and Hillary practice.

Wallace: “But, Robby, there is some new stuff. Emails show, and I’m going to go through some of them, you were not happy at all (about) the idea of this meeting and her going there.”

Mook: Calling it a scheduling issue, he claimed “(w)e didn’t want her going overseas…before the campaign was kicking off.”

Journalist Bob Woodward called Clinton Foundation practices “corrupt…a scandal. The mixing of speech fees, the Clinton Foundation, and actions by the State Department which she ran are all intertwined…You can’t just say it’s unsavory.”

It’s the kind of stuff landing ordinary people in prison. Bill and Hillary remain unaccountable for years of illegal practices.

Instead of long overdue prosecution, they’re returning to the White House in January for a third co-presidential term as things now stand – apparently rigged to assure it.

How Understanding Sandy Hook Unlocks The Mind, Makes Latest Corruption Leaks Easy To Fathom

It seems everyone is getting all worked up about the ongoing wikileaks and new revelations of corruption in the US political system. But why are so many people shocked at the blatant corruption especially involving the mainstream media, in the Hillary camp and the DNC? Is anything happening that educated truth seekers didn’t already know? Is there anyone who considers themselves politically awakened who didn’t already know the elections are rigged? Or that the debates, campaign tours and interviews for the ruling elite’s chosen puppet (in this case Hillary Clinton) are not staged? Seriously, is there anyone that doesn’t already know that the western corporate mainstream media is corrupt and biased?

All of these “leaks” reveal nothing new whatsoever to vigilant astute truth seekers. Especially to anyone who has been following the Sandy Hook saga. By that of course I’m referring to the December 14, 2012 Sandy Hook “event”. The FEMA drill admitted by Obama’s own insiders and outlined in the December 14, 2012 FEMA manual which describes a mass casualty drill involving children.

Yes, anyone familiar with the Sandy Hook psyop knows exactly how cold, calculating, callous and frankly how evil people blindly committed to the purpose of the state can be. Those aware of the depth of the Sandy Hook psychological operation know that agents working for the state will indeed commit to something they know is a crime because (just as in the now exposed latest DNC voter fraud scandals) they believe and are confident they are above the law due to protection from the state.

Watch those voter fraud videos and listen to Scott Foval and Bob Creamer talk like they are completely above the law. Similarly Sandy Hook criminals including the fake parents involved in the Sandy Hook multi-million dollar scheme believe they are completely above the law as they cry “harassment” whenever they are confronted with their vicious lies. A trick many who consider themselves honest truth seekers have fallen for repeatedly. Then there’s Lenny Pozner, seemingly the ring leader of this underground Sandy Hook mafia who copyright strikes video after video and (video) channel after channel attempting to stop people interested in researching Sandy Hook from discovering information that will convince them that Sandy Hook was a hoax event.

Anyone who has been watching this Sandy Hook underground mafia in action the past few years is probably yawning their way through these recent wikileaks revealing blatant free-for-all corruption and evil and wondering, tell me something I don’t know.

Yes, believe your eyes. The corruption you are now privileged to see and hear about, thanks to the information age we find ourselves in, is just the tip of the iceberg. Now more than ever is the time to open your mind and flush out the fantasies that we live in a democracy or that politicians do what is right. Now is the time to truly see the matrix of lies for what it is. Confront the reality that evil is running wild, that corruption is the norm, that the ruling elite don’t give a crap about you or anyone. Now is the time to open your mind and let the tidal wave of reality wake you up fully to what is happening. Let go the old paradigm which was all based on illusions.

As we swim in one revelation after another about voter fraud, mainstream media betrayal of America and vicious lies and propaganda let’s allow this moment to heal our minds. Let’s not allow mainstream media lies and deceit to seed itself in our minds yet again.

Let’s all learn from recent history and realize that we’ve been played for fools by the mainstream media. The Sandy Hook event, just like many of the shooting and bombing “events” of the past few years were all scripted for many reasons most importantly to take your guns away while the actors make a lot of money.

Here’s the video by Independent Media Solidarity ‘We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook‘. Watch it and let the Sandy Hook story unlock your mind. Realize that we do in fact live in that much of a corrupt world. The evil that surrounds us however is thankfully finally being revealed. Yes some truth seekers say these leaks are scripted but don’t miss the revealed reality (of corruption- they really are that corrupt!) because you are too caught up in diagnosing the intention.

And once you see the true level of corruption we (the people) are dealing with, this consciousness will allow us to move in a brand new direction. This is very much a part of the current global paradigm shift that is happening.

The Sandy Hook event thus acts as a key to consciousness, as I’ve said many times. Go ahead, open the door and come on in, your mind is now unlocked and fully capable of understanding the current day corruption. A new day and a new paradigm is here for better or for worse.

Pathological Liar Hillary’s Convenient Memory Lapses Under Oath

(image credit: Reuters)

Last Thursday, Judicial Watch released responses Hillary gave to 25 JW questions – asked under oath about her email practices, submitted on August 30, her written answers ordered by US District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

She took great pains to obstruct justice without crossing the line, lodging numerous objections to questions asked:

“on the grounds that any discovery…is unwarranted…”

claiming information requested falls “outside the scope of permitted discovery…’

saying questions related to after her tenure as secretary of state

claiming “personal in nature” emails aren’t “within the scope of the permitted topics”

objecting to information requested “about management, retention, and/or preservation of federal records”

taking exception to “provid(ing) information that is not within her personal knowledge”

claiming information requested was “privileged or otherwise protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege…”

objecting to and refusing to provide information relating to “a privilege log”

She objected to the definition of the “Clintonemail.com email system…used to host her…account after her tenure as secretary of state.”

She lodged a similar objection to her account “insofar as it refers to email addresses used by other individuals in the domain name ‘clintonemail.com.’ “

On October 14, a JW press release explained she responded “does not recall” to 20 of the 25 questions, listed below:

“Response 3: Clinton said she does not recall any specific consultations regarding the decision to use the clintonemail.com account for official State Department business.”

“Response 4: Clinton said she does not recall participating in any communications before or during her tenure as Secretary of State concerning to her decision to use a clintonemail.com account to conduct official State Department business.”

“Response 6: Clinton said she does not recall being advised, cautioned, or warned, she does not recall that it was ever suggested to her, and she does not recall participating in any communication, conversation, or meeting in which it was discussed that her use of a clintonemail.com e-mail account to conduct official State Department business conflicted with or violated federal recordkeeping laws.”

Response 7: Clinton said she does not recall considering factors other than convenience in deciding to use a personal e-mail account to conduct official State Department business.”

“Response 8: Clinton said she does not recall whether she had a specific expectation that the State Department would receive FOIA requests for or concerning her e-mail.”

“Response 11: Clinton said she does not recall specifically informing the State Department’s records management personnel about her use of her clintonemail.com e-mail account to conduct official State Department business… And she does not recall interacting with Clarence Finney or employees of the Executive Secretariat’s Office of Correspondence and records.”

“Response 12: Clinton said she does not recall State Department personnel asking her for access to her clintonemail.com e-mail account to search for e-mail responsive to a FOIA request during her tenure as Secretary of State.”

“Response 15: Clinton said she does not recall what precisely she meant by the words ‘address’ or ‘device.’ “

“Response 16: Clinton said she does not recall requesting a State Department-issued Blackberry or a State Department e-mail account in or around August 2011.”

“Response 17: Clinton said she does not recall reviewing Assistant Secretary Bowell’s Information Memo attached as Exhibit D to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories during her tenure as Secretary of State.”

“Response 18: Clinton said she does not recall seeing the June 28, 2011 cable attached as Exhibit E to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories during her tenure as Secretary of State.”

“Response 19: Clinton said she does not recall being advised, cautioned, or warned during her tenure as Secretary of State about hacking or attempted hacking of her clintonemail.com e-mail account or the server that hosted her clintonemail.com account.”

“Response 20: Clinton said she does not recall considering whether to allow the State Department access to her clintonemail.com e-mail account when she was preparing to leave office…She does not recall anyone from the State Department asking her for access to her clintonemail.com e-mail account or asking her to print her work-related e-mails when she was preparing to leave office.”

“Response 21: Clinton said she does not recall considering after she left office whether she could alter, destroy, disclose, or use emails concerning official State Department business.”

“Response 22: Clinton said she does not recall altering, destroying, disclosing, or using any e-mails related to official State Department business from her tenure as Secretary of State in her clintonemail.com account or instructing anyone else to do so after she left office and before her attorneys reviewed the e-mails in her clintonemail.com email account in response to the State Department’s request.”

“Response 25: Clinton said she does not recall having communications with Bryan Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any e-mails in her clintonemail.com email account.

JW president Tom Fitton said Hillary’s memory lapses “show she fears full disclosure about her emails.”

She’s an exposed pathological liar, caught red-handed numerous previous times, including under oath, making her guilty of perjury, yet remaining uncharged.

The fix is in to absolve her of war crimes, racketeering and perjury, serious criminality enough to send ordinary people to prison.

Elevating her to the White House means empowering her to commit far greater crimes than earlier – an ignorant, indifferent public unaware of the unprecedented danger she represents.