Even though the article turned out to be a hoax, don’t think for a minute it doesn’t express the sentiments and goals of those who published it.
“White Men And The Vote: Why We Took The Blog Down,” The Huffington Post admits in a contrived mea culpa written less as an apology for journalistic malpractice than an exercise in finger-pointing and excuse-making. Huffington Post SA has removed the blog ‘Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?’ published on our site on April 13, 2017.”
“SA”?
South Africa. Nothing like adding a more fuel to an already volatile situation.
Why did they take it down?
Bottom line: It wasn’t for moral reasons, like it might inspire more violence, terror and misery. The simple truth is, they got punked. The author of the article wasn’t a real leftist spouting the requisite subversive and hateful inanities. It was a setup, an intentionally outrageous submission from a fake contributor who succeeded in appealing to HuffPo’s elitist strain of privileged “progressivism” and getting the piece published in a forum that would reach the world.
They didn’t take it down because they found the premise objectionable. Any pretenses of self-righteousness and responsibility now being feigned are just that. If the whole thing hadn’t proven an embarrassing fraud, they’d still be defending the author and the proposals, that:
“[A] denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners … A period of twenty years without white men in the world’s parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared.”
“Gullible Huffington Post Falls for Hoax Article Calling for White Men to be Stripped of Voting Rights,” HeatStreet reported. “They even crowed about how much traffic it was getting and mocked readers for complaining, before suddenly reversing their decision and deleting the post over the weekend.”
That in itself is telling. As someone who has been blogging and writing internet articles for some time, I have experienced being hoaxed myself. No matter how much due diligence you engage in, it can still happen. But the important thing is, you don’t then try to erase the past, at least if you’re honest. You admit where you erred but don’t try to hide it. After all, the whole point behind all of this is to discern the truth. Unless you have an agenda where truth is an inconvenience to be supplanted by historical revisionism (SOP for collectivists)…
To call for stripping white men of their right to vote and of their property is especially dangerous at this time in South Africa, when attacks, torture and murder against whites are on the rise. The government’s response (which is predictable when you recall President Jacob Zuma, singing songs like “Shoot the Farmer, Kill the Boer” and demanding land be confiscated from whites without compensation) is to ramp up confiscation of licensed and registered guns.
Zimbabwe, here they come!
The government knowing who has what is the prerequisite. That’s why the push here for “universal background checks” and renewed demands for things like “one gun a month.”
Oh, but South Africa is different from the United States, right? We have protections they don’t!
The goals are the same. Give it a few years for the cultural terraforming here to become irreversible, particularly if his enemies on both sides of the aisle succeed in torpedoing Donald Trump. Because look at the type of legal “thought” that already exists on the Supreme Court, sure to be joined by more of the same should Republicans blow it and the Democrats take over.
Per sitting Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg:
“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a Constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the Constitution of South Africa,” says Ginsburg, whom President Clinton nominated to the court in 1993. “That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. … It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done. Much more recent than the U.S. Constitution.”
Don’t doubt for a minute that the fake HuffPo piece, to “disenfranchise” (that is, enslave) white males by taking away their property isn’t exactly what the globalists are working toward, and that “progressive journalists” wouldn’t go into eye-rolling ecstasy fantasizing about.
It’s kind of fitting, really, when you think about how founder Ariana Huffington came into the initial bulk of her fortune.
—–
If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, please consider making a donation to support our work. You can donate HERE.
