As one of the more inept tentacles of the deep state, CNN was just caught staging Fake News in the aftermath of the ISIS claimed London attacks which claimed 7 lives and injured 48.
While ISIS supporters are celebrating the attacks, MSM propagandists are hard at work pushing the "religion of peace" narrative - trotting out hijabbed women and a child to hold signs expressing Muslim outrage at the terrorist attacks.
This wasn"t an "organic" protest against terrorism. These Muslims didn"t just take it upon themselves to print glossy signs and show up. Instead, CNN staged their outrage.
Check it out...
CNN caught staging news!
They even brought "peace group" printed out papers and props.
Coalition-led airstrikes in Syria killed a total of 225 civilians between April 23 and May 23, the highest 30-day death toll for U.S.-led forces since the campaign began,Agence France-Presse reported. That"s nearly double the number of intended targets: The U.S.-led strikes killed 122 ISIS fighters and eight fighters loyal to the Syrian government, the report said.
The rising tide of civilian deaths attributable to coalition forces suggest that May could be the fifth straight month that civilian deaths from coalition-led strikes outpace the civilian death toll from Russian forces, according to the AFP report and an analysis of data from Airwars.org.
Of the 225 civilian deaths, reported to AFP by the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, 44 were children and 36 were women.
The civilian death toll from Russian strikes has declined since it peaked in January. Meanwhile, deaths from U.S.-led strikes have risen dramatically.
“There has been a very big escalation,” Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman told AFP.
The previous deadliest 30-day period for U.S.-led forces was between February 23 and March 23 this year, when 220 civilians were killed, Abdel Rahman told AFP.
The past month"s deaths brought the overall civilian toll from the coalition campaign to 1,481, among them 319 children, AFP reported.
The coalition launched operations against ISIS in Iraq in August 2014, then expanded them to Syria the following month. The Russian intervention began a year later.
However, the rising tide of casualties relative to intended targets could soon shift as the US Military implements a new strategy ordered by President Trump that"s designed to annihilate ISIS in Syria in an effort to prevent foreign fighters from returning home. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said Trump"s order for the military to change up its plans for dealing with ISIS has led to a “tactical shift from shoving ISIS out of safe locations in an attrition fight to surrounding the enemy in their strongholds so we can annihilate ISIS.”
Today, President Trump "changed his mind" about Syria and Assad, due to the horrific pictures showing victims of a chemical weapons attack that killed dozens in the ISIS controlled city of Idlib. The media has been plastering one dead child after the next -- evoking emotional responses from people looking for a villain to bomb. On a much smaller scale, these are the same tactics that were used to draw us into the 9/11 wars, which still persist in all of their horrible, indecorous, calamity, 16 years hence.
Trump has changed his mind.
Before we start send sorties into Syria, trying to take out both Russian and Syrian forces, how about we first see evidence proving this was a government sponsored attack?
Thus far, according to the NY Times, this is all we have -- this one flimsy attestation by "witnesses."
Witnesses said the gas was delivered by a government airstrike. The attacks raised the possibility that the Syrian government used a banned nerve agent, like sarin, after it agreed in 2013 to eliminate its chemical weapons program.
Fox"s Geraldo "Al Capone Punk"d Me from the Grave" Rivera offered his take, stating the obvious. It made no sense for Assad to use chemical weapons, especially after the US made overtures accepting his rule in the country.
Syria: Are people reacting to the pictures of children or from EVIDENCE? The more potent the pictures, the less you question the evidence.
The US Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, gave an overly dramatic speech regarding the attacks -- standing up and showing pictures of dead children, asking Russia "how many children have to die before Russia cares?"
Russian officials have a different account of the events in Idlib. They said Assad attacked an ISIS weapons depot, which had chemical weapons in it.
Can we be sure who is telling the truth? No.
But, thanks to social media, some serious facts have been presented, such as people receiving gas masks two days prior to the attacks and an anti-Assad reporter, writing about a chemical gas attack 24 hours in advance. How can we explain this? Personally, I think we"d be fools to believe anything ISIS or the "moderate rebels" have to say on the matter.
Wow. This anti-Assad "reporter" tweeted about the sarin attack in #Syria 24 hours before it happened. Still think nothing fishy is going on? pic.twitter.com/xrGWemylFW
Let"s examine the timeline and what has just transpired. The war that the neocons have wanted for the past half decade in Syria, displacing Assad for a "pro-western" leader, was just greenlit by Trump. Bannon was booted from the NSC, amidst rumors that Trump"s son in law, Jared Kushner, was leaking info to the Morning Shill, Joe Scarborough. Nikkie Haley sabre rattled Russia, Syria and Iran at the UN. Trump "changed his mind." Rex Tillerson told Russia to "rethink Assad."
