Showing posts with label Hashtags. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hashtags. Show all posts

Sunday, September 17, 2017

Protesters Smash Windows, Throw Bricks At Cops In Second Night Of St. Louis Violence

For the second consecutive night, peaceful daytime protests descended into late-night violence with broken windows and thrown rocks, water bottles and garbage can lids following Friday"s acquittal of a white former police officer in the shooting death of a black suspect. A small group of demonstrators refused to disperse, breaking windows at dozens of businesses and throwing objects at police, who moved in with hundreds of officers in riot gear to make arrests.



According to the Asociated Press, the confrontation took place late Saturday night in the Delmar Loop area of University City, a suburb about 10 miles (16 kilometers) west of St. Louis near Washington University. The area is known for concert venues, restaurants, shops and bars, and includes the Blueberry Hill club where rock legend Chuck Berry played for many years.


A pocket of protesters threw bricks, rocks and projectiles with paint at police as officers tried to disperse the crowds. Nine people were arrested Saturday night during the protests, two police departments in the area said.


Shortly before 11 p.m. at Leland and Delmar, a small group of protesters threw chunks of concrete at police and broke windows at numerous Delmar Loop businesses. A chair was thrown through the window of a Starbucks.



One protester was seen hitting a police SUV with a hammer. Police made more than a half-dozen arrests witnessed by reporters, including a protester who was carried away by officers by his arms and legs.



Earlier in the day, hundreds of protesters marched through the Delmar Loop near nightfall Saturday, as Mayor Lyda Krewson appealed to residents for calm and normalcy going into the second night of protests.


"These are not the images we want to see of our city," Krewson told reporters at an early evening news conference, referring to violence in the Central West End the night before that included damage to her house. "We have some work to do here."


She implored residents to "go about their lives" amid canceled events and uncertainty about how long the unrest would continue. "I know our small-business owners would appreciate seeing you again," she said. "Of course, go to work, of course go out to eat. We shouldn"t be so fearful here."



By shortly after 7 p.m. Saturday, more than a thousand protesters carrying "Black Lives Matter" signs and chanting things like "No Justice, No Profits" were blocking the major intersection at Skinker and Forest Park Parkway near Washington University. Police later closed Delmar for the marchers, who were relatively peaceful going into the evening. Some yelled "F--- the police!" while others shook officers" hands.



As the chaos escalated, scores of police officers in riot gear pushed forward against the demonstrators just after 11 p.m. — about two hours after daytime protest organizers had congratulated their followers on keeping their demonstrations peaceful. By 11:30, about 200 police officers had pushed most of the protesters out of the area and the violence and vandalism appeared to be dissipating. The sidewalks along the vibrant area of restaurants and shops were strewn with glass from broken windows.


University City had been the scene of a peaceful march earlier in the evening to protest the previously discussed ruling on Friday which cleared ex-officer Jason Stockley of first-degree murder in the 2011 shooting of 24-year-old Anthony Lamar Smith. That march ended with organizers calling for people to leave and reconvene Sunday afternoon.


But a few dozen protesters refused to go. Police ordered them to disperse, saying the protest was illegal. Hundreds of police in riot gear eventually moved in with armored vehicles. The demonstrators retreated down a street, breaking windows with trash cans and throwing objects at police.


Among property damage Friday night, police said in a statement, were broken windows and thrown red paint at Krewson"s home near Lake and Waterman; shattered windows at various locations in the area including a Subway sandwich shop, a Walgreen"s, the St. Louis Public Library"s Schlafly Branch, and several local businesses; broken vehicle windows including those on two police vehicles; and 18 fires.


Among numerous canceled St. Louis events for the weekend were planned concerts by U2 and Ed Sheeran, because police couldn"t guarantee security.


* * *


Cori Bush, a social worker and activist who is running for Congress in Missouri"s St. Louis-based 1st District, helped lead the marchers early Saturday evening. At the intersection of Skinker and Delmar boulevards, she called for a six-minute "die-in" for the six years since the fatal police shooting of Anthony Lamar Smith. Bush said city officials and media focused too much on the vandalism in the Central West End late Friday night.


"None of it could"ve happened at all, had there not been a dead body, had there not been a police officer who did something absolutely horrendous," she said on loud speaker to the crowd. "The message is simple: stop killing us," she said. "Black folks say, stop killing us."


* * *


Several protesters were seen in handcuffs, and city and county police later tweeted that they had arrested at least nine people. Police were seen carrying one handcuffed man away from the scene upside down. At least one demonstrator was treated after he was hit with pepper spray.


After the burst of violence ended, a reporter for The Associated Press found at least half of the businesses on one side of the street with broken windows along a two block area.


Sam Thomas, who was helping his friend clean up the glass from the shattered windows of his clothing and accessories boutique, OSO, said he understood why people were angry. The U.S. justice system is broken and needs to be fixed, Thomas said.


"I"m not saying this is the right way to fix it," he said of the damage. "The window isn"t murdered. Nobody is going to have a funeral for the window. We can replace it."


As reported yesterday, on Friday night, nearly three-dozen people were arrested and 11 police officers suffered injuries, including a broken jaw and dislocated shoulder. Five officers were taken to hospitals. Police said 10 businesses were damaged that night, and protesters broke a window and spattered red paint on the home of St. Louis Mayor Lyda Krewson.


Saturday night"s violence also capped a day of noisy but peaceful demonstrations at suburban shopping malls.


Protesters shouted slogans such as "no justice, no profits", "black lives matter" and "it is our duty to fight for our freedom" as they marched through West County Center mall in the suburb of Des Peres, west of St. Louis.



A group also demonstrated at another suburban shopping center, the Chesterfield Mall, and at a regional food festival. Organizers hoped to spread the impact of the protests beyond predominantly black neighborhoods to those that are mainly white.




Organizers Saturday night said they planned a "die in" on Sunday at 3 p.m. near St. Louis Police headquarters on Olive Street.



* * *


Smith"s death is just one of several high-profile U.S. cases in recent years in which a white officer killed a black suspect, including the 2014 killing of Michael Brown in nearby Ferguson that sparked months of angry and sometimes violent protests.


Stockley wasn"t charged until May of last year, which was three years after he left the force a moved to Houston and more than four years after his December 2011 confrontation with Smith. The former police officer shot Smith after Smith fled from Stockley and his partner, who were trying to arrest him for a suspected drug deal. Stockley, 36, testified that he felt he was in danger because he saw Smith holding a silver revolver when Smith backed his car toward the officers and sped away.

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

Tucker Carlson Debates BLM Supporter Over Segregated Blacks-Only Event

Tucker Carlson debated a horribly racist Black Lives Matter supporter last night - compelling his guest to distance herself from the group by the end of the interview...


Last weekend, a New York City BLM group decided to throw an "Exclusively Black" Memorial Day party creating what they called an "Exclusively Black Space."





Being intentional about being around Black People is an act of resistance. This is an exclusively Black Space... -NY BLM Group




Sorry guys...



In response to the event, Fox"s Tucker Carlson hosted an ardent BLM supporter, who defended the segregated event with a series of regressive analogies and outdated race-based identity politics (scroll down for the video).






Tucker: I was confused by this because I thought the whole point of BLM - one of the points would be to speak out against singling people out on the basis of their race and punishing them for that. Because you can"t control what your race is, and yet they seem to be doing that. Explain that to me?



#1 - White Privilege





Lisa: What I say to that is BOO HOO HOO... You white people are angry because you couldn"t use your White Privilege card to get invited to the Black Lives Matters all black memorial day celebration!



Tucker: Well, hold on... [she does not]



#2 - Memorial Day was created by former slaves





Lisa: Memorial day was created by black former slaves in 1865 to honor those individuals who were union soldiers who fought and died for our  freedoms. So Black Lives Matter in that same vein decided to get together with Black folks to make sure that Black folks are celebrated for being murdered by racist terrorists. If you"re mad at that, you just.... [mic cut]



Tucker: I"m not mad at that - I just have a really simple question for you. If you don"t like people excluding others on the basis of their race. And as a society, we agree that"s bad - why are you defending that?



#3 - Every day is "White Day"





Lisa: White folks crack me up... all of the sudden when "we" want one day for black folks to focus on ourselves - but you"ve been having White Day forever!



#4 - Hollywood is racist





Lisa: You"ve had an all white Oscars, all these movies with all white actors - movie after movie after movie, all white TV shows with white casts over and over and over again.



Tucker: I hope you"re not speaking for anyone else. What you"re saying is SO hostile and separatist and crazy. It"s such a basic violation of what I thought we all agree on - which is that you don"t attack people for things you don"t control - namely their race.



#5 - White people are like unruly children at a wedding





Lisa: People give weddings where they exclude children. It doesn"t mean they don"t like children - they don"t know if your kids are gonna be monsters... So in that same vein, black lives matter decided to have one day where they didn"t want white folks that were gonna be off the rails. They don"t know if you"re gonna be behaved.


"Stay your asses out! We wanna celebrate today. We don"t want anybody going against us today."



Tucker: And you can"t celebrate if someone that doesn"t look like you is around? You"re demented, actually. You"re sick. And what you"re saying is disgusting. And if you were a NAZI [Lisa: Ooooh!] I would say the same thing to you. Because what you"re saying is indistinguishable. "I don"t care your opinions, I don"t care your views - your life experience - your intentions... All I care about is the way you look," something that you can"t control. And on that basis alone I"m judging you...



I can"t believe I have to say that out loud!



#6 - America is an inherently racist society





Lisa:  Well unfortunately, when you have a racist society like America, you force individuals to come together collectively to make sure that they have a voice. And that"s unfortunate that the racism has caused people to come together collectively.



Tucker then asks Durden if there"s a single White person in America that she"d let into the event. Perhaps realizing what a total racist she"d been for the last 7 minutes, she distances herself from the BLM decision.





Lisa: Now I"m not Black Lives Matter. Black Lives Matter is a movement. However, however, however - I can respect the decision. It doesn"t mean it"s the decision I would have made. Maybe I would have. Just like a wedding where I might say your kids can"t bring their bad asses at my wedding!



Tucker: Children are not an ethnic group.



See below:



 

Saturday, June 3, 2017

And The 2017 Global Peace Prize Goes To... Black Lives Matter (No, Seriously)

Authored by Mac Slavo via SHTFplan.com,


Every year the Sydney Peace Foundation bestows their Global Peace Prize on extraordinary people who advocate for “true and lasting peace” by ending “war and violent conflict” through addressing “deep injustices and structural inequality.”


Previous years have seen such individuals as Noam Chomsky, Hans Blix and Archbishop Desmond Tutu receive the esteemed prize.


But this year the award is taking a different direction, and rather than being given to a single person, it is being awarded to an entire movement for the first time.


And the winner of the 2017 Global Peace Prize goes to…


Drum roll…


Black Lives Matter.






Black Lives Matter, the movement against racial inequality and police violence in the US which began as a powerful hashtag and became a global rallying cry, will be the 2017 recipient of the Sydney Peace Prize – the first time the often-controversial award has gone to a movement and not an individual.



The prize recognises the work of the amorphous racial justice movement that exists under the catch-all moniker, but has nevertheless managed to unite activists from around the world, including in Australia.



...



The Sydney Peace Prize jury’s citation for this year’s winners applauded the movement “for building a powerful movement for racial equality, courageously reigniting a global conversation around state violence and racism. And for harnessing the potential of new platforms and power of people to inspire a bold movement for change at a time when peace is threatened by growing inequality and injustice.”



Via Sydney Peace Foundation



But as Louder With Crowder points out, peace is not exactly how one would describe the activities engaged in and supported by Black Lives Matter:





It’s like people don’t have internet access. Memories. Basic motor functions. If they did, they’d be able to use the digits sticking out of their hands to peck a few letters into The Google. Just to verify if Black Lives Matter is worthy of an award bestowment. Like a kind of “vetting” process, if you will. Since the Sydney Peace Foundation lacks finger privilege, I did the search for them.


If this is what the Sydney Peace Foundation considers champions of peace, I’d hate to see what they think war is.



In a world where former U.S. President Barrack Obama is awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 for doing absolutely nothing and then subsequently orchestrating campaigns that have led to the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of people across the world it would make perfect sense for the Sydney Peace Foundation to award a similar prize to an organization whose immediate membership and loosely based offshoots advocate for racial segregation, violent protest, and the killing of police officers.


In the eyes of some, peace is war.

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Black Lives Matter Activist: ‘White People Give Your Money, Your House, Your Property’ For Social Change

It"s hard to describe the person featured in this leaked periscope video as anything but unhinged. Whether or not she"s representative of the majority of anti-Trump, Black Lives Matter activists isn"t quantifiable at this time. It is, however, ridiculous to see people supporting this brand of hatred, designed to disrupt the very fabric of western civilization.
 
That being said, whatever happened to dignity and grace? Are those qualities no longer important to the left?
 
In this clip, a Black Lives Matter activist demanded that white people hand over their homes, money and property to pay reparations to black and indigenous people.
 
"The White House must die".
 

 
I find it hard to believe any "normal" democrat wants this sordid brand of activism representing their interests. For the republican party, this is like a gift that keeps on giving. The further entrenched the leftist media and activist organizations become, the more Americans become disgusted by them. Say what you want about the popular vote during the elections, the fact remains -- republicans have been making strident gains over the past 8 years in every facet of government, both national and local -- netting more than 1,000 legislative positions since 2010.
 
In my estimation, the behavior of the left is the result of decades of social engineering, which taught children that everyone was a winner and to avoid dangerous objects, like see-saws or playing dodgeball. They seem to be unable to deal with adversity; and instead of coping with defeat, like any normal well-adjusted person after an appropriate period of mourning, they become unhinged and resort to primeval animalistic behavior.




Content originally generated at iBankCoin.com

Monday, January 16, 2017

Is Tolerance A One-Way Street?

Submitted by Douglass Murray via The Gatestone Institute,


  • When just about every other magazine in the free world fails to uphold the values of free speech and the right to caricature and offend, who could expect a group of cartoonists and writers who have already paid such a high price to keep holding the line of such freedoms single-handed?

  • Most of the people who said they cared about the right to say what they wanted when they wanted, were willing to walk the walk -- to walk through Paris with a pencil in the air. Or they were willing to talk the talk, proclaiming "Je Suis Charlie." But almost no one really meant it.

  • If President Hollande and Chancellor Merkel had really believed in standing up for freedom of expression, then instead of walking arm-in-arm through Paris together with such an inappropriate figure as Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, they would have held up covers of Charlie Hebdo and said: "This is what a free society looks like and this is what we back: everyone, political leaders, gods, prophets, the lot can be satirised, and if you do not like it then you should hop off to whatever unenlightened hell-hole you dream of."

  • The entire world press has internalised what happened at Charlie Hebdo and instead of standing united, has decided never to risk something like that ever happening to them again.

  • For the last two years, we have learned for certain that any such tolerance is a one-way street. This new submission to Islamist terrorism is possibly why, in 2016, when an athlete with no involvement in politics, religion or satire was caught doing something that might have been seen as less than fully respectful of Islam, there was no one around to defend him.

The 7th of this month marked two years to the day since two gunmen walked into the offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris and murdered twelve people. This period also therefore marks the second anniversary of the period of about an hour during which much of the free world proclaimed itself to be "Charlie" and attempted, by walking through the street, standing for moments of silence or re-tweeting the hashtag "Je Suis Charlie" to show the whole world that freedom cannot be suppressed and that the pen is mightier than the Kalashnikov.


So two years on is a good time to take stock of the situation. How did that go? Did all those "Je Suis" statements amount to anything more than a blip on the Twitter-sphere? Anyone trying to answer such a question might start by looking at the condition of the journal everyone was so concerned about. How has it fared in the two years since most of its senior editorial staff were gunned down by the blasphemy police?



A Paris rally on January 11, 2015, after the Charlie Hebdo attack, featuring "Je Suis Charlie" signs. (Image source: Olivier Ortelpa/Wikimedia Commons)


Not well, if a test of the magazine"s wellbeing is whether it would be willing to repeat the "crime" for which it was attacked. Six months after the slaughter, in July 2015, the new editor of the publication, Laurent Sourisseau, announced that Charlie Hebdo would no longer publish depictions of the Prophet of Islam. Charlie Hebdo had, he said, "done its job" and "defended the right to caricature." It had published more Muhammad cartoons in the issue immediately after the mass murder at their offices and since. But, he said, they did not need to keep on doing so. Few people could have berated him and his colleagues for such a decision. When just about every other magazine in the free world fails to uphold the values of free speech and the right to caricature and offend, who could expect a group of cartoonists and writers who have already paid such a high price to keep holding the line of such freedoms single-handed?


Now, at the second anniversary of the atrocity, one of the magazine"s most prominent figures, Zineb El Rhazoui, has announced that she is leaving the magazine. El Rhazoui, who has been described as "the most protected woman in France" because of the security detail she receives from the French state, has announced that Charlie Hebdo has gone "soft" on Islamic radicalism. She told Agence France-Presse that "Charlie Hebdo died on [7 January 2015]." The magazine had previously had a "capacity to carry the torch of irreverence and absolute liberty" she said. "Freedom at any cost is what I loved about Charlie Hebdo, where I worked through great adversity."


Of course, El Rhazoui is an unusual person. And a scarce one in twenty-first century Europe. Which is why she needs the security detail. Most of the people who said they cared about the right to say what they wanted when they wanted, about everything and anything -- including one particularly stern and unamused religion -- were willing to walk the walk: that is, they were willing to walk through Paris with a pencil in the air. Or they were willing to talk the talk, proclaiming "Je Suis Charlie." But almost no one really meant it. If they had, then -- as Mark Steyn pointed out -- those crowds in Paris would not have been parading through the streets holding pencils, but holding cartoons of Mohammed. "You"re going to have to get us all" would have been the message.


And ditto the leaders. If President François Hollande and Chancellor Angela Merkel had really believed in standing up for freedom of expression, then instead of walking arm-in-arm through Paris together with such an inappropriate figure as Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas, they would have held up covers of Charlie Hebdo and said: "This is what a free society looks like and this is what we back: everyone, political leaders, gods, prophets, the lot can be satirised, and if you do not like it then you should hop off to whatever unenlightened hell-hole you dream of. But Europe is not the continent for you."


Instead, in the two years since those gestures, European society went quiet. Of course, there have been regular opportunities to display the modern idea of virtue, often using Charlie Hebdo as the punching bag. Since being alerted to the existence of the magazine by the gunmen, the censorious types who now fill our societies (and who probably do not even buy or read magazines) nevertheless regularly send out social media messages objecting to things to which they have been alerted within the magazine.


So it is that a rude and satirical magazine has found itself repeatedly judged by the humourless morality police of our day and often deemed to be insufficiently reverential about various world events. A Charlie Hebdo cartoon about the Cologne New Year"s Eve sexual assaults was deemed in poor taste. Elsewhere, the publication"s response to an earthquake in Italy failed to hit the single acceptable note in the eyes of some non-readers. Likewise the crash of a Russian jet and other stories that were considered to lack appropriate piety.


Meantime, we are in a situation, as the British author Kenan Malik said of the period after the Satanic Verses affair, of having "internalised" the atrocity. The entire world press -- perhaps especially, in free countries -- has internalised what happened at Charlie Hebdo, and instead of standing united has decided, quietly and in the privacy of their own offices, never to risk something like that ever happening to them again. This new submission to Islamist terrorist demands is possibly why, in 2016, when an athlete with no involvement in politics, religion or satire was caught doing something that might have been seen as less than fully respectful of Islam, there was no one around to defend him. Even the British Prime Minister, Theresa May, asked in the House of Commons to stand up for the right of an athlete not to have his career destroyed because of one fleeting, drunken joke, equivocated:





"This is a balance that we need to find. We value freedom of expression and freedom of speech in this country -- that is absolutely essential in underpinning our democracy.



"But we also value tolerance to others. We also value tolerance in relation to religions. This is one of the issues that we have looked at in the counter-extremism strategy that the Government has produced.



"I think we need to ensure that yes it is right that people can have that freedom of expression, but in doing so that right has a responsibility too -- and that is a responsibility to recognise the importance of tolerance to others."



For the last two years, we have learned for certain that any such tolerance is a one-way street. Our societies had been walking up it. But from the other direction came the Kalashnikov brigade who only had to fire once; in the face of it, the whole civilised world chose to U-turn and run back the other way. Allah"s blasphemy police would be foolish not to push the advantage that such capitulation gives their cause over the months and years ahead.

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Screaming Protesters Kicked Out Of Sessions' Hearing: "You Can't Arrest Me, I'm White"

With opening comments barely underway, several protesters have already been escorted out of Senator Jeff Sessions" confirmation hearing. 


The first interruption came from these lovely gentemen who, dressed in KKK garb, shouted "White people don"t get arrested...white people own this country" as they were quickly escorted by police off the premises.





"You can"t arrest me, I"m white.  White people don"t get arrested.  What do we have to do, wait for the inauguration?"



"You can not take me out of here.  White people own this country."





And here is another angle of the madness, where one protester attributes his interruption to the Black Lives Matter movement.





"Senator Sessions is a racist and he will only continue racist policies.  We need to listen to Black Lives Matter."





Meanwhile, this young lady insists that you just "say no to the Trump fascist regime."





"Say no to the Trump fascist regime.  We have to stop these motherfucking pigs from getting into power."



"You"re a pig!  Stop these fascist pigs from getting into power."





And here is another compilation of the madness so far:


Wednesday, December 28, 2016

Largest Police Union In U.S. Demands Amazon Pull Black Lives Matter Shirts

Submitted by Joseph Jankowski via PlanetFreeWill.com,



The largest police union inside the United States is demanding that Amazon.com pull Black Lives Matter shirts from its inventory because the apparel is “offensive.”


Fraternal Order of Police president, Chuck Canterbury, wrote to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos in an open letter to ask the online retailer to “prohibit the use of the Amazon name and website for the retail” of shirts and sweatshirts with slogans “Bulletproof”, “Black Lives Matter” and “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot,” which Canterbury described as “offensive” and the spread of “urban myths.”



While demanding the apparel be shunned from the popular online retailer, the FOP president applauded the company for “demonstrating the reality of the American dream” and its philanthropic work and expressed his hope that it shares “FOP’s goal of increasing the bonds of trust between the men and women of law enforcement and the communities they serve.”





“I wanted to let you know that my members are very upset that you and Amazon are complicit in the sale of this offensive merchandise,” Canterbury added, cautioning that the sale of the apparel could “damage your company’s good name amongst FOP members and other active and retired law enforcement officers.”



Canterbury, who has served as the FOP president since 2003, went on to express sadness over the fact that some “third party sellers are making money by exploiting racial divisions” in the US.


Neither Amazon or Black Lives Matter have responded to the FOP’s open letter and the “offensive” apparel still remains available for purchase on the Bezos run platform.



Just last week, the FOP sent a letter to Walmart asking the retail giant to pull similar Black Lives Matter apparel. On the same day the letter was received, Walmart said it would remove the shirts which say “Bulletproof,” but not the “Black Lives Matter” shirts.


Since its inception, Black Lives Matter has openly expressed disdain for law enforcement and has even been connected in the murder of police officers across the United States.


Black Lives Matter was founded by militant feminists Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors and Opel Tometi, who cite Marxist revolutionary and convicted cop killer, Assata Shakur, as one of the groups most influential figures.


The movement’s supporters famously celebrated the sniper attack in Dallas earlier in the year which killed 5 police officers.


A BLM leader was caught on tape back in July calling for supporters to shoot police and run them over.





Members of the Black Lives Matter movement have been connected in the murder of 11 police officers since its inception in 2014.