Showing posts with label California State University. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California State University. Show all posts

Thursday, October 19, 2017

Chinese Army Documents Leak Set To Embarrass Beijing

Authored by Jan van der Made via RFI,


In the vaults of Amazon.com’s self publishing market place, a growing series of books exposing China’s dark secrets is seeing the light. Six books with colorful covers, which constitute the “China Secrets” series, introduce a reader to the fascinating world of China’s internal – or neibu – documents. But many questions remain.



Since 2015, unnoticed by the large majority of the China watchers, the books, with titles like The China 1989 Army Documents, Spying against the United States, Spying against India and others can now be bought on Amazon.


Author Ben Keiler [probably a pseudonym] claims the documents are being put before the public “for the first time ever”.


They shed a new and unique light on events as diverse as the 1989 Tian’anmen Square massacre and the martial law imposed in Tibet three months before, the China-India border conflict culminating in hostilities in Bhutan earlier this year


It also offers detailed descriptions of the state of Chinese army intelligence gathering in respect of the US, South Korea, Japan and other countries, since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949.


Real or not?


In total some 500 pages, filled with copies of documents, military maps and tables have been published.


The big question is: are the documents real?


For centuries, sinologists have struggled with the question of authentification of documents.


Andrew Nathan and Perry Link published the Tiananmen Papers in 2001, a book with translated secret documents leaked or provided by “Zhang Liang,” a pseudonym, that minutely describe the policy process that lead to the Tian’anmen crackdown on June 4, 1989 in Beijing.


They said in the preface that the documents went through a meticulous five-stage process of selection before publication was decided, and they still cannot confirm their veracity completely.


Keiler criticizes the lack of access to the original documents in the Tiananmen Papers, saying that they “contain not a single copy of an original [ ] and this fact makes it easy to challenge the content.”


Indeed, Keiler’s 1989 Army documents do show copies of maps and documents that list in minute detail the of the People’s Liberation Army [PLA]’s troops before and during the attack on Tian’anmen Square on June 4, 1989.


The square had been occupied for weeks by students demanding an end to corruption, more transparency and a chance to participate in the politcal process. China"s leaders had imposed martial law, and moved the army against Beijing"s demonstrating civilians.



Internal map showing the advances of the PLA into Tian"anmen Square on June 4, 1989


There is a minute-to-minute army account of how PLA troops fight themselves through the crowds reaching the square and removing the remaining students by 04:00 am, as planned.


In a preceding chapter of the book, Keiler illustrates - again showing highly classified neibu material -  how the PLA crackdown in Tibet, in March 1989, served as an example for the Tian’anmen attack.


The author reproduces PLA policy documents and lists of material, including guns and vehicles used, down to the amount of bullets handed out to the martial law troops who were to control the Tibetan protesters.


Who is Ben Keiler?


None of the Chinawatchers contacted by RFI was familiar with Ben Keiler or his work, but some expressed doubts:


“If the documents were authentic, major publishers would have been interested, and the Chinese Government would have reacted strongly against Amazon. So far I have not seen a prima facie case to do this,” says Steve Tsang, director of the China Institute at the School for Oriental and African Studies [SOAS] in London.


Perry Link, one of the two editors of the Tian’anmen Papers says that “one needs to be skeptical of these things, and yet it would be a mistake to reject them out-of-hand,” while Nathan insists that the documents can’t be authenticated “just by looking at them. It requires a lot of research,” he says.


Others were more forthcoming. Michael Dillon, founder of the Center for Contemporary Chinese Studies at the University of Durham and author of Deng Xiaoping, the Man who Made Modern China, said, after “a preliminary look,” that he found the “level of detail [of the 1989 Army Documents] is convincing,” but admitted that it was not possible to be certain if they were originals.


He also pointed out that the lack of the significant red stamps and handwritten autographs of relevant leaders on some of the documents presented could mean they are just a draft or print out.


"[They]cast doubt on when and how they were issued and used. Even if they are genuine we cannot be sure that they were final drafts,” he says.


But Song Yongyi, librarian with California State University, who himself did extensive work exposing cannibalism during the Cultural Revolution in the Guangxi Autonomous Region, going through massive amounts of secret documents, said that one set of documents about the Korean War looked very familiar to him.


“When I was collecting documents about PRC history, I did see some of them. They are government publications [on] internal and classified level,” he writes in an email to RFI.


Other volumes of the “China Secrets” series dig deep into Chinese intelligence sources, showing the detailed level of knowledge Beijing had of military positions of the Indian army during the 1962 border war, South Korean positions during the 1950-53 Korea war; always with many illustrations of colorful maps and [parts of] documents and extensive commentary.


 What does Keiler want?


The identity of the author, as well the way he obtained the documents is shrouded in mystery.


“Questions regarding who’s behind the China Secrets Series are secret and will not be answered,” he says in the preface.


“Years of efforts and movements of persons went into the effort to make it as difficult as possible to hide the methods and all the persons involved” in obtaining the documents.


The reason: under China’s stringent security laws and regulations, leakers of “state secrets” may face the death penalty.


But Keiler explains why the risk may be taken: in the preface of the China 1989 Army Documents, he says that by exposing details about army units involved in the crackdown, “people responsible can be named and if possible persecuted ... once places, units and names are known and officers can no more hide behind a screen of [a] "state secret" it will become more difficult to find persons ready to use machine guns against civilians the next time such an incident happens in China.”



Internal document showing PLA troops that got rewarded after the 1989 Tian"anmen crackdown


Publication of Chinese intelligence on the US, India, South Korea and other countries would give researchers and, ultimately, politicians, a better insight in how the Chinese military acts under extreme circumstances.


Meanwhile, production goes on. In 2017 some six volumes were produced, and 11 more are on the way.


Among the new books will be the first publication of top secret documents on decoding, China’s 1979 war with Vietnam, a history on Chinese army mapping and a book on the Tibetan uprising in 1959 and the Chinese crackdown.


Until now, the Chinese government has offered no reaction regarding the leaks.

Monday, October 2, 2017

Paul Craig Roberts Warns Americans: "Oligarchic Rule Prevails Regardless Of Electoral Outcomes"

Authored by Paul Craig Roberts,


Do the Wall Street Journal’s editorial page editors read their own newspaper?


The frontpage headline story for the Labor Day weekend was “Low Wage Growth Challenges Fed.” Despite an alleged 4.4% unemployment rate, which is full employment, there is no real growth in wages. The front page story pointed out correctly that an economy alleged to be expanding at full employment, but absent any wage growth or inflation, is “a puzzle that complicates Federal Reserve policy decisions.”


On the editorial page itself, under “letters to the editor,” Professor Tony Lima of California State University points out what I have stressed for years: “The labor-force participation rate remains at historic lows. Much of the decrease is in the 18-34 age group, while participation rates have increased for those 55 and older.”



Professor Lima points out that more evidence that the American worker is not in good shape comes from the rising number of Americans who can only find part-time work, which leaves them with truncated incomes and no fringe benefits, such as health care.


Positioned right next to this factual letter is the lead editorial written by someone who read neither the front page story or the professor’s letter. The lead editorial declares: “The biggest labor story this Labor Day is the trouble that employers are having finding workers across the country.” The Journal’s editorial page editors believe the solution to the alleged labor shortage is Senator Ron Johnson’s (R.Wis.) bill to permit the states to give 500,000 work visas to foreigners.


In my day as a Wall Street Journal editor and columnist, questions would have been asked that would have nixed the editorial. For example, how is there a labor shortage when there is no upward pressure on wages? In tight labor markets wages are bid up as employers compete for workers. For example, how is the labor market tight when the labor force participation rate is at historical lows. When jobs are available, the participation rate rises as people enter the work force to take the jobs.


I have reported on a number of occasions that according to Federal Reserve studies, more Americans in the 24-34 age group live at home with parents than independently, and that it is those 55 and older who are taking the part time jobs. Why is this? The answer is that part time jobs do not pay enough to support an independent existence, and the Federal Reserve’s decade long zero interest rate policy forces retirees to enter the work force as their retirement savings produce no income. It is not only the manufacturing jobs of the middle class blue collar workers that have been given to foreigners in order to cut labor costs and thus maximize payouts to executives and shareholders, but also tradable professional skill jobs such as software engineering, design, accounting, and IT—jobs that Americans expected to get in order to pay off their student loans.


The Wall Street Journal editorial asserts that the young are not in the work force because they are on drugs, or on disability, or because of their poor education. However, all over the country there are college graduates with good educations who cannot find jobs because the jobs have been offshored. To worsen the crisis, a Republican Senator from Wisconsin wants to bring in more foreigners on work permits to drive US wages down lower so that no American can survive on the wage, and the Wall Street Journal editorial page editors endorse this travesty!


The foreigners on work visas are paid one-third less than the going US wage. They live together in groups in cramped quarters. They have no employee rights. They are exploited in order to raise executive bonuses and shareholder capital gains. I have exposed this scheme at length in my book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism (Clarity Press, 2013).


When Trump said he was going to bring the jobs home, he resonated, but, of course, he will not be permitted to bring them home, any more than he has been permitted to normalize relations with Russia.


In America Government is not in the hands of its people. Government is in the hands of a ruling oligarchy. Oligarchic rule prevails regardless of electoral outcomes. The American people are entering a world of slavery more severe than anything that previously existed. Without jobs, dependent on their masters for trickle-down benefits that are always subject to being cut, and without voice or representation, Americans, except for the One Percent, are becoming the most enslaved people in history.



Americans carry on by accumulating debt and becoming debt slaves. Many can only make the minimum payment on their credit card and thus accumulate debt. The Federal Reserve’s policy has exploded the prices of financial assets. The result is that the bulk of the population lacks discretionary income, and those with financial assets are wealthy until values adjust to reality.


As an economist I cannot identify in history any economy whose affairs have been so badly managed and prospects so severely damaged as the economy of the United States of America. In the short/intermediate run policies that damage the prospects for the American work force benefit what is called the One Percent as jobs offshoring reduces corporate costs and financialization transfers remaining discretionary income in interest and fees to the financial sector. But as consumer discretionary incomes disappear and debt burdens rise, aggregate demand falters, and there is nothing left to drive the economy.


What we are witnessing in the United States is the first country to reverse the development process and to go backward by giving up industry, manufacturing, and tradable professional skill jobs. The labor force is becoming Third World with lowly paid domestic service jobs taking the place of high-productivity, high-value added jobs.


The initial response was to put wives and mothers into the work force, but now even many two-earner families experience stagnant or falling material living standards.


New university graduates are faced with substantial debts without jobs capable of producing sufficient income to pay off the debts.


Now the US is on a course of travelling backward at a faster rate. Robots are to take over more and more jobs, displacing more people. Robots don’t buy houses, furniture, appliances, cars, clothes, food, entertainment, medical services, etc. Unless Robots pay payroll taxes, the financing for Social Security and Medicare will collapse. And it goes on down from there. Consumer spending simply dries up, so who purchases the goods and services supplied by robots?


To find such important considerations absent in public debate suggests that the United States will continue on the country’s de-industrialization, de-manufacturing trajectory.

Wednesday, September 27, 2017

Marxist Professor Doubles-Down On "Trump Must Hang" Tweet

Authored by Kyle Perisic via CampusReform.org,


A California State University, Fresno professor is defending his tweet stating that “Trump must hang,” which led to his suspension earlier this year.



Lars Maischak spoke publicly about the incident for the first time in an interview with Politico published Sunday, saying he was merely describing a possible outcome, and was not endorsing violence against President Trump.


Maischak tweeted, “To save American democracy, Trump must hang. The sooner and the higher, the better. #TheResistance #DeathToFascism.”





“You can’t honestly regret saying something that was true just because of the consequences,” Maischak, who openly identifies as a Marxist, told Politico.



“I’m with [Martin] Luther on that one. Here I stand, I cannot help it.”



Maischak then tried to spin the situation into an issue of “academic freedom” and not an incitement of violence by claiming he was just spitballing his ideas over a non-academic social media platform.


After the attack this summer on Congressman Scalise, Fox News referenced Maischak and other left-wingers and said that they “bear responsibility for unsettling political discourse that has crossed the line of civility and could spawn acts such as” the shooting.


Maischak, however, insisted that his tweets were intended for academic purposes only, saying he was only trying to highlight the historical fact that the leaders of fascist governments have often been executed by political opponents.


In addition to the tweet calling for Trump’s execution, Maischak also expressed a desire “for the execution of two Republicans for each deported immigrant.” The tweets were so serious that the FBI investigated Maischak because of them.


While the teacher’s union to which Maischak belongs doesn’t explicitly offer protections for social media use on a personal account, Fresno State’s Faculty Senate is reportedly developing a policy related to such issues, though claims it has nothing to do with Maischak’s case.


Meanwhile, Maischak has conspired that his suspension came as a result from pressure from conservative donors to the school.


Specifically, he believes that Michael Der Manouel—a Fresno State alumnus, donor to the school’s football team, and local talk radio contributor—pressured the school to prevent him from teaching during the spring semester, though his  only evidence of this claim is that Der Manouel and president of the school had a meeting together.

Thursday, May 25, 2017

Suspected Berkeley Antifa Bike Lock Attacker Eric Clanton Arrested For Assault


Eric Clanton, 28, a former Diablo Valley and California State University philosophy professor suspected in the Antifa bike lock attacks was arrested for assault Wednesday afternoon in Oakland.


Clanton is being held on $200,000 bail after being booked into Berkeley City Jail - though police have not said whether the arrest is connected to online investigative efforts which identified Clanton as a person of interest in bike lock attacks





"[Clanton] was arrested on suspicion of use of a firearm during a felony with an enhancement clause and assault with a non-firearm deadly weapon. -East Bay Times"





4chan unmasking


Clanton is the suspected Antifa member going around with a bike lock assaulting Trump supporters. The weaponized autists over at 4chan "unmasked" him based on photographic and video evidence along with publicly available information. 


(Attack at 18 sec)


 






How 4chan did it... 


 



Content originally generated at iBankCoin.com * Follow on Twitter @ZeroPointNow