Showing posts with label Consumer electronics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Consumer electronics. Show all posts

Monday, December 18, 2017

Is The iPhone X Racist?

A woman in the eastern Chinese city of Nanjing has been offered a second refund after faulty facial recognition software on two iPhone X handsets allowed her colleague to unlock them.



As The South China Morning Post reports, the woman, identified only by her surname Yan, told the Jiangsu Broadcasting Corporation that despite activating and configuring each phone’s facial recognition software, her work colleague was able to get into both devices on every attempt.


Yan said the first time it happened, she called the Apple hotline, but the staff would not believe her.


Shen then went with her colleague to the nearest Apple store, where her colleague used facial recognition on the phone to demonstrate the issue to staff, according to the report.


The store said the camera might be faulty and gave Yan a refund. But the new iPhone X that she bought also had the same problem, prompting the shop to offer another refund, the report said.


No details were given about whether the woman decided to purchase a third iPhone X.


Apple did not respond immediately to a request for comment.


So the question is... does the iPhone X (or its operating system) think all young Chinese women look the same? ... and therefore, is it racist?









Saturday, November 4, 2017

Do Not Break Your iPhone X

With the iPhone X, Apple’s re-designed anniversary iPhone, official launch today, we saw the familiar images of people lining up in front of Apple Stores around the world to be among the first ones to get their hands on the new device.



Despite the X’s lofty price – it starts at $999 for the smaller 64 GB model, making it the most expensive iPhone to-date – it’s safe to say that Apple could sell a lot more units on Friday than it can possibly produce by then. When the iPhone X became available for pre-order last Friday, it was sold out within minutes and the estimated delivery time currently stands at 5 to 6 weeks.


But, as Statista"s Felix Richter notes, to all those quick or lucky enough to get an iPhone X anytime soon, our advice is: do not drop it.


Infographic: Do Not Break Your iPhone X | Statista


You will find more statistics at Statista


According to Apple’s official support website, the company’s latest smartphone is just as expensive to repair as it is to acquire.


Repairing the screen alone will set you back $279 or nearly twice what you pay for a new iPhone 8 screen. If you’re unlucky enough to break more than just your screen, you’ll be out $549 to get your phone fixed.


Oops...










Thursday, October 19, 2017

"This Is Very Rare" - Apple Slashes iPhone 8 Supplier Orders By 50% As Demand Dries Up

Following reports this morning that channel checks show iPhone 7 outselling iPhone 8, Taipei-based Economic Daily News reports that orders for iPhone 8 and Plus have been slashed by around 50% for November and December, citing an unidentified official at the supply chain.


As we detailed earlier, a new report by KeyBanc Capital Analyst John Vinh, channel checks have revealed that Apple"s older iPhone 7 models are outselling the recently launched iPhone 8 ahead of the early November debut of the premium iPhone X.



As traditionally new editions of the iPhone have sold quickly as fans queue for the latest upgrade, this time it"s clearly different...



 As pent up demand for the iPhone X is clearly cannibalizing sales, and the surveys add to signs that the iPhone 8 is not proving as popular as its predecessors.





"Many respondents indicated that a meaningful portion of customers are buying iPhone 7 in lieu of the new iPhone 8, given the lack of significant enhancements in the new phone," Vinh wrote in his research report, which relied on channel checks in the United States and United Kingdom.



"Feedback from stores indicate customers are waiting to purchase the iPhone X or to compare the iPhone X before buying the iPhone 8," wrote Vinh, who is rated four out of five stars by Thomson Reuters StarMine for his recommendation accuracy on the Apple stock.



Another reason for the slow uptick of the iPhone 8 could be the modest promotion by U.S. carriers, Vinh said. "While carriers continue to offer promotions for the new iPhone 8, they have been much more modest compared to the iPhone 7 launch last year," he wrote.



Which probably explains why Economic Daily News reports that Apple is now betting all-in on the iPhone X, cutting supplier orders on the iPhone 8 (and 8 Plus) drastically. [via Google Translate]





But the supply chain has said that "this year is quite rare", the new product has just been mass production for about one to three months, was asked to begin to decline, "is the first time in ten years."



Supply chain sources revealed that iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus expectations of 11 - 12 months of shipments of 1 to 1.2 million per month will be substantially reduced, down nearly half of the range, shipment will be only 500-600,000.



So, as we concluded earlier, with Apple bull hopes falling squarely on the shoulders of the iPhone X, a key unknown factor is what the price will be. The much-anticipated iPhone X, a glass and stainless steel device with an edge-to-edge display, will start shipping from Nov. 3 with the 10th-anniversary iPhone priced from $999, Apple"s most expensive mobile till date.

Friday, September 22, 2017

"This Is Embarrassing": 2 People Show Up For iPhone 8 Launch in China

Confirming reports that reception for Apple"s newly launched iPhone 8 may be "underwhelming" to put it lightly, as the phone provides little if any material improvement over its lower-priced predecessor even as sales for hardcore fans will be cannibalized by the iPhone X, is the following report from Hangzhou, China which shows that all of 2 people were waiting in line for the latest gizmo from Tim Cook.




As Chinese media reports, summarized by David Kersten, "note the barricades for the anticipated queue...



... that had to be put away because only 2 people showed up."



Some more details:





I"ve C&P"d this article, clumsily translated by Google, because, being from a Chinese site, it doesn"t adapt well to the Facebook environment, however, the link is provided as are the pictures.



"Embarrassing! IPhone 8 today, Hangzhou, security guards are busy removing the fence.





September 22, the Bank of China iPhone 8 officially opened in the major channels. Hangzhou Apple West Lake shop, more than six in the morning to thirty or forty security. Black fence posture full of a row of rows, turn a few 90 degrees bend. 8:00 to open the door, the door on the two line up. 8:43 security guards began to withdraw fence ...





According to Hong Kong media, and the mainland, Hong Kong, Apple shop customers have no more employees."





With the iPhone 8 a dud, at least in China, AAPL longs are hoping that the reception for the iPhone X in a few weeks will be notably more enthusiastic, or else Apple may have a major problem on its hands.

It's Not Just China: No Lines For New iPhone 8 Virtually Anywhere

Earlier we showed that in a striking lack of enthusiasm for Apple"s latest offering, the iPhone 8 which went on sale today, there were just two people in "line" in front of an Apple store in China: less than the security guards at the same location.



Unfortunately for Tim Cook, it appears that it was not just China as the entire world appears to have gotten collective cold feet when it comes to Apple"s newest gizmo,  because while Apple Stores are usually faced with shockingly long lines on the morning of a new iPhone launch, that wasn"t the case today. Anywhere.


As various reports have pointed out, some Apple Stores have very short lines out front for the iPhone 8, if they have anyone at all. According to Reuters, that there were fewer than 30 people at Apple’s Sydney store, which usually has hundreds out front. And it described a “less lively mood in Asia” than for previous launches.


In California, ABC7 reporter Chelsea Edwards posted a photo from outside of an Apple Store with no one in front of it.



Other photos showed short (or no) lines in Brisbane, London, Leicester, and Ottawa






According to CBS LA, the Pasadena store was also missing a line of eager fans.





Previous releases of the iPhone attracted hundreds of Apple fans waiting in the early morning hours at several stores across Southern California. The Apple Store has a ticketing system, but that never stopped eager iPhone fans from camping out overnight.



But on Friday morning, all was quiet on Colorado Boulevard, except for employees inside the store handing out tickets.




To be sure, some pockets of enthusiasm remained, such as at Apple’s location at the World Trade Center and on Fifth Avenue in New York which did have a line this morning, and there appeared to be a big turnout in Singapore.



As we commented earlier, and the Verge adds, there are reasons this launch might not be getting as much turnout. For one, this is the 10th generation of the iPhone, and hype has probably just died down. People are no longer lining up to buy their first or second smartphone, and this year’s model doesn’t have any revolutionary new features that people are willing to wait overnight for.


Furthermore, in November Apple is launching the next "revolutionary" iPhone — the iPhone X — not the iterative update that’s coming out today. It’s the same reason there wasn’t a rush for the iPhone SE, either.


More concerning is that there are signs that the iPhone X is cutting into iPhone 8 online orders, too. Speaking to BuzzFeed News, Angela Ahrendts, Apple’s retail leader, said “it’s kind of our fault” that lines are going away, because Apple gives customers a choice of where to buy their phone, online or in person. That’s been true for years, though. BuzzFeed also says it saw short lines in Toronto, London, and Los Angeles.


While it is too early to conclude if the sudden disappearance of customers is troubling for Apple"s future says, it is hardly the reception Tim Cook - who carefully cultivates the image of pent up demand by parading the lines of people greeting its every product launch - wanted. Still, more important will be what happens outside Apple stores on November 3rd, when the iPhone X comes out, although with concerns mounting about the public"s receptivity to the phone"s face-scanning technology which has already received scathing criticism among even pro-Apple outlets, some investors are unwilling to wait: AAPL stock is down over 1% today and is about to have its worst week since April 2016.


Wednesday, September 13, 2017

iPhone X So Expensive In India "You Can Fly To Hong Kong, Buy It, Come Back And Save Money"

One day after the most anticipated Apple product launch in 10 years, several problems have emerged for the much hyped iPhone X, face-recognition demo flop notwithstanding: it will be substantially delayed confirming all earlier reports of supply-chain bottlenecks, and it will be expensive, perhaps prohibitively so. The introductory prices of the iPhone 8 and the iPhone 8 Plus have gone up compared to the prices of the iPhone 7 and the iPhone 7 Plus. The iPhone X, meanwhile, will price in the 4 digits well equipped. Addressing this issue, the WSJ has a front page article titled "Apple’s New iPhones Gamble on Allure of Premium Pricing."


In one place that gamble may prove insurmountable. As India Today writes, when it goes on sale in India on November 3, the iPhone X will cost Rs 89,000 for the 64GB version. The top-end variant with 256GB is going to cost Rs 102,000. "In other words, this is one expensive phone, although you can say that the iPhone has always been expensive."


To demonstrate just how expensive, on a purchase price parity basis, the iPhone X will be in India, India Today writes that "the other thing that you can say about the iPhone X is that it is cheaper in some other places. As it always happens, the market where the iPhone X is going to be the cheapest is probably Hong Kong." 





In fact, the iPhone X is so expensive in India, and so cheap in Hong Kong, that you can go Hong Kong, buy the phone, and come back and yet save some money. And this includes the cost of flight ticket to Hong Kong. Just see the math."



iPhone X (256GB) in India: Rs 102,000



iPhone X (256GB) in Hong Kong: Hong Kong Dollar 9,888. This means using the current exchange rate, in Indian currency the price is Rs 80,999.



What does this mean? It is cheaper to go to Hong Kong and buy the iPhone X 256Gb variant there.



The iPhone X will be available from November 3. Now, if you book your flight to Hong Kong today, the cheapest flight in the first week of November that you can book from Indian will cost around Rs 20,000. If you book a flight from Kolkata, you can get a return ticket to Hong Kong for little over rs 17,000. From Bangalore it is around Rs 19,000. From Delhi, around Rs 20,000. From Mumbai it is a little more expensive.



Flight ticket: Air Asia Rs 17,800


iPhone X 256GB: 80,999
Some other expenses: Around Rs 2000 to Rs 3000
Total: Around Rs 1 lakh
Money saved: Around Rs 2000



The report"s conclusion:





Now, we know the whole thing sounds like a joke. And in a way it is. No one is going to go specifically to Hong Kong from India to buy the iPhone. Also, it works best with the 256GB variant. But it does show the ridiculousness of the iPhone prices. and particularly the iPhone X prices, in India. Is it because Apple can"t price the iPhone any cheaper? Is it because Apple wants big profit margins? Is it because of Indian government taxes? Is it because Apple wants to keep the iPhone prices high so that it continues to a status symbol in India? We don"t know. Only Apple can answer these questions, if it wishes to answer them.



For now Apple is ignoring these, and various other pressing questions - including the whole animated poop emoji. Overnight Doug Kass released the following assessment of why this time Apple may have gone too far:





Apple continues to deliver an expensive smartphone relative to its peers, with many features that are already available from its competition and most of which were anticipated, including face recognition, a full-screen interface and no home button.



The only exception to reality versus anticipation was the later-than-expected availability, which is toward the end of the year (orders will be accepted on Oct. 27 and deliveries are slated for Nov. 3). As a result, analysts could take 3 million to 4 million iPhones out of their December quarter projections and reduce full-year 2018 estimates by about $0.40 a share.



However, the new Apple phone will provide an animated poop emoji so you can talk crap to your friends.



The starting price for the 64GB model of the iPhone X is $999 and $1,149 for the 256GB model. The Apple smartphone continues to be a high-priced aspirational product accompanied by a remarkably effective marketing effort that is stretching its status symbol appeal. However, I see little incremental to the latest product offerings, leaving room for disappointment relative to optimistic expectations. (It is why I initiated an Apple put position yesterday morning and added to that position when the stock was up $2 early in the afternoon).



The expectations of an Apple replacement super-cycle accompanied by higher unit volumes and much higher average selling prices, leading to expectations of a "hockey stick" of earnings growth in the coming fiscal year coupled with a general confidence in sustainable growth from there, have spurred a rise of more than 50% in Apple"s one-year forward price/earnings multiple in the last 1 1/2 years.



I clearly have underestimated the strength of and the confidence in the Apple franchise over the last year. Recognition of this has led me to maintain more of a trading-oriented short position, whereas years ago I had more of an investment short position, which proved successful. Nevertheless, I continue to believe that these aggressive "going forward" expectations for Apple and the company"s current valuation remain too ambitious.



But the biggest threat facing the iPhone and perhaps the entire Apple business model, is if its products are no longer perceived as the pinnacle of "coolness." And while it is too early to conclude either way, following yesterday"s disappointing and badly leaked release, many appear to be taking aim at Apple not as the source of brilliant Steve Jobsian innovation and "hipness", but as the target of mockery, scorn and humor. Indeed, as one readers suggested, "The bloom may be coming off the rose.  Even folks in the twittersphere piling on.  In the past there was such a halo around apple, nobody would make fun of them.  Now it seems the opposite."


Iis the idol worship coming to an end? According to these widely publicized reactions to the iPhone release, the answer appears to be yes.

Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Watch Live: Apple Unveils Latest iPhone From Spaceship Campus

Update: This seemed to sum things up in Cupertino perfectly - Steve Wozniak is wandering around. He said he is excited to see the new iPhone features, especially the facial recognition. He likes the feature a lot on his Samsung phone.



1001ET BLACKBERRY ENTERPRISE UPDATED TO AAPL IOS 11 MOBILE OPER SYSTEM


The stock ran up excitedly into the event...


1007ET APPLE TURNS POSITIVE AS PRODUCT EVENT BEGINS


1019ET Apple Watch - *FOSSIL SHARES DIP AS APPLE CLAIMS TOP POSITION IN WATCHES


*  *  *


As we detailed earlier, anticipation is sky high as CEO Tim Cook prepares to unveil Apple"s latest iPhones (and "one more things") from The Steve Jobs Theater at the new Apple "spaceship" Campus.



As CNET reports, for the past eight months, we"ve watched a parade of flagship phone launches, from power players like Samsung with the Galaxy S8 to scrappy players like Motorola with its family of Moto phones. Premium phones with not-so-premium prices like the OnePlus 5 have also competed for our attention.


Meanwhile, rumors about the next iPhone kept trickling out thanks to leakers and established publications alike.


Apple is set to cut through all the noise with the official unveiling of at least one new iPhone (and maybe more), as well as the rumored release of updates to the Apple Watch and Apple TV. There"s also a chance we get more details on the forthcoming HomePod smart speaker.


Watch live here (if you"re on a Mac with Safari).


Live Feed (via CNET):



What are we expecting...


 A weekend leak of some unreleased iOS 11 code may have spoiled all the surprises Apple had in store for tech fiends at tomorrow’s big iPhone event, with John Gruber of Daring Fireball calling the leaker “the least-popular person in Cupertino.”





There is expected to be three new phones. Two will at least be modest upgrades to the iPhone 7, getting beefier chips and the like.



The phone people really care about -- in imagination, if not necessarily spending plans (yet) -- is the 10th anniversary version of the phone.



While Apple was typically quiet about its plans, by now the world has a pretty good sense of the feature set.



The phone is expected to be Apple’s first with an organic light-emitting diode, OLED, display, which will be larger at 5.8 inches, and sharper, than the previous LCD displays.



Hold on to your hats: Apple ditched the home button in the phone, which is expected to now be unlocked through facial-recognition technology.



The phone is also expected to offer wireless charging and 3D sensors that enhance the performance of coming augmented-reality apps.



What will the stock do?


UBS technology analyst Steven Milunovich says there’s a distinct pattern in how Apple’s stock price reacts to these product launches.





“Based on the last five iPhone announcements, the stock has a reasonably consistent pattern: down in the two weeks preceding the event; up/down 1-2% the day of the event; up between the event and launch (phone availability about two weeks later); weak in the two weeks post launch; and then up going into earnings,” he wrote in a note out Tuesday morning.


“We think there is somewhat greater near-term downside risk this time though we expect the stock to outperform over the next 6-12 months.”



Here"s how the stock has moved before, during, and after previous iPhone announcements, relative to the S&P 500:


Monday, September 11, 2017

Middle-Class Chinese Say A $1,000 iPhone Is "Too Expensive"

Apple Inc. had hoped that its iPhone eight might demolish the company’s sales records in China as the country’s burgeoning middle class embraced the phone, thanks in part to its name: Eight is considered a lucky number in Chinese culture, signifying wealth and fortune.


Unfortunately for the world’s most valuable company, this calculus isn’t playing out as well as its massive marketing operation had hoped for one simple reason: The price of the phone is simply too high for most members of the company"s target demographic.


However, Apple investors reacted positively to news Monday that the company"s iPhone 8 would be priced at $1,000 a unit. AAPL was up nearly 2% in early trade.



Two versions of the iPhone 8, along with a third premium model known as the iPhone X, will be officially unveiled at its product launch in Cupertino tomorrow. Details on price points of the new devices and their availability dates are still unknown, though even the cheapest of the latest top-of-the-line model is expected to cost about $1,000.


Unfortunately, the bulls could be a little short-sighted, especially considering that signs of slowing sales in some of Apple’s key growth markets have weighed on its share price in the past.


To wit, Reuters reporters spoke to regular Chinese citizens about the new iPhone – specifically, whether they intended to buy one. For Apple, their response was discouraging.


Here’s Reuters:





“Chinese shoppers, however, are already counting the cost, with the latest model tipped to have a price tag upward of $1,000 - roughly double the average Chinese monthly salary.



“I’ll wait for a drop in price, it’s too expensive,” said Angie Chen, 23, a project manager in Nanjing and iPhone 6 owner.



Chen said she might even wait for the new phone’s successor, when prices will fall. “It’s a nice number to hear, but there’s no rush.”



As Reuters points out, Greater China, which (according to Apple’s definition) includes Taiwan and Hong Kong, accounted for roughly 18 percent of iPhone sales in the quarter ended in July, making it the company’s third-largest market after the US and Europe. Meanwhile, the iPhone’s share of China’s smartphone shipments fell to 9% between January and June, down from 14% in 2015, according to data from Counterpoint Research.


Compounding the problem for the company is the fact that some analysts expect China to be a key driver of sales growth. Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty told Bloomberg that she is watching for especially strong growth in China after the upgradeable, 2-year old iPhone base grew 56% this year, meaning more consumers are choosing to buy successive iPhone models.



Yet sales in China are down 10 percent from a year earlier, extending a nearly three-year series of declines. That contrasts with growth in all other regions. And although the Chinese currency has risen sharply against the dollar in 2017, a dramatic reversal of those gains could be imminent after Chinese authorities eliminated a requirement that sales desks set aside 20% of their revenues from sales of FX derivatives. The policy was intended to make it too costly to short the yuan, helping the PBOC fend of speculators as it sought to slow the currency’s depreciation against the dollar last year. But now, the central bank has ostensible switched off the “no” in the “no vacancy” sign at the yuan short-seller’s motel. And predictably, the yuan saw its largest drop in eight months overnight as the bears piled back in.



All of this means the phone will be more expensive for consumers, further suppressing sales as Chinese consumers stick with popular domestic brands like Xiaomi. But even with the company’s shares trading near all-time highs, despite reports of production problems that could limit supplies of the new models, whether or not another slowdown in China will actually impact the company’s shares remains to be seen.


* * *


In a preview of tomorrow"s product launch, several Apple analysts told Bloomberg what they felt would be the biggest reveals during CEO Tim Cook"s highly anticipated presentation. In terms of new features, while investors will certainly pay close attention to the iPhone"s hardware, the change that has the most significance with long-term implications is the addition of 3D-sensing capabilities that enable augmented reality applications, Gene Munster said.


While AR applications will be backward compatible to the 2015 iPhone 6S, the addition of designated 3D and computer vision hardware on the premium iPhone would be a “big step toward putting AR in the hands of everyday users” and a big step toward the “next generation of computing - beyond the smartphone," according to Munster via Bloomberg.


Performance of facial recognition on the OLED iPhone will be widely scrutinized, as the device probably won’t have a fingerprint sensor for login and Apple Pay usage, according to KeyBanc analyst Andy Hargreaves.


According to RBC analyst Amit Daryananianother, recent surveys suggest “sizable pent up demand” and excitement around the iPhone launch. With more of the hundreds of millions of iPhone users around the world expected to upgrade their devices this year, Daryananianother said the company could experience a "sales supercycle."

Sunday, September 10, 2017

New iPhones are not enough to keep Apple’s stock going, it needs a new category

It is hard to find a bigger Apple stock cheerleader than me. I’ve been writing Apple stock love poems for years. For a long time, it was easy to love the shares because they were unloved by others and it was cheap.


Until recently, when Apple stock was still trading in the low $100s and at single-digit multiples, we were buying current product categories at a discount and were not paying for future product categories.


At today’s price that is not the case anymore. That is true with any company – the more expensive the stock gets, the more clairvoyance investors need to discern the company’s future growth.


At Apple’s size it is very hard for the company to increase its earnings significantly. Macs, iPads, and even iPhones are mature products.


The iPhone may have a few growth spurts left, but not many. It is facing an unavoidable headwind: the elongation of its replacement cycle. The iPhone improved substantially over the years, but as the i-marvels piled up, the incremental improvements that motivated people to buy a new phone every two years or so became less and less significant.


At some point the iPhone will face the fate of the iPad – its replacement cycle long in the tooth and sales stagnant and declining.


Will the iPhone’s sales stop growing in 2018, or 2020? I don’t know, but from a long-term perspective of the company’s valuation, a few years don’t make that much difference.


(A new iPhone is expected to be unveiled next week. The stock fell slightly Wednesday on concern supply disruptions could cause shipping delays with the new phone.)


Services is the only segment that can grow at a double-digit rate for a considerable period of time, but it only represents 13 percent of revenue. Even the Apple Watch doesn’t really move the needle.


They need another genius



But can Apple come up with new product categories? Let’s ponder on this question in the context of the following quote:


“Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.” – Arthur Schopenhauer


Apple has a lot of talented people designing and redesigning products in the categories that Apple already dominates. They are hitting a lot of targets no else can hit. Apple’s brand is as healthy as ever, and so is product satisfaction.


However, to create a new category of products Apple needs to “hit targets no one else can see,” and this requires a genius. But in an organization of this size with a lot of bright and talented people, it also requires a benevolent dictator – someone able to make bold, unconventional decisions (and own them), someone who in addition to everything else is able to inspire others to create what they may think is impossible. Yes, I am referring to the one and only Steve Jobs, he of the “reality distortion field.”



Here is an instance that comes to mind: Jobs asked his engineers to come up with a touchscreen computer – a tablet. They did. It looked like a bulky version of today’s iPad. Steve looked at and said “Let’s put the tablet on ice,” then refocused the company on miniaturizing that tablet and making a phone instead.


It is important to remember that at the time, though Apple was financially healthy, it was not swimming in cash the way it does today. Jobs made a benevolent dictator-like decision: He diverted engineers who were working on the MacOS to work on what would become the iPhone OS, causing the late release of some Mac products. And only years later, after the iPhone was a raging success, Apple brought the iPad back to life. That was Jobs’ Apple.


Now let’s visit Tim Cook’s Apple. The New York Times ran an in-depth article unearthing why Apple has (so far) failed to come up with an electric self-driving car. These few sentences jumped out at me:


“But the car project ran into trouble, said the five people familiar with it, dogged by its size and by the lack of a clearly defined vision of what Apple wanted in a vehicle. Team members complained of shifting priorities and arbitrary or unrealistic deadlines.”


Nokia spent a lot on R&D too



Even Jobs admitted that Cook is not a “product man.” Cook doesn’t have “the vision,” and thus he doesn’t have the authority to be a benevolent dictator. Nor does he have the charisma to project and maintain a reality distortion field.


Today Apple spends almost $12 billion on R&D – double what it spent just a few years ago. But as outside observers, we really don’t know where this money is going. Or more importantly, how productively it is being spent. I vividly remember how Nokia was increasing its R&D spend every year during the last years of its dumb-phone dominance, but all that R&D did not bring forth new products that would have saved the company from its eventual demise. Apple is not facing Nokia-like collapse, but the R&D argument still stands: R&D spend doesn’t always equal great new products.


The NY Times article said that Apple curtailed its ambition to make a car and is now focusing solely on self-driving technology. In other words, Apple is basically pulling out of the electric car space (at least for now).


If Apple develops and licenses its self-driving technology, it will recover some of its losses on investments made to date. But it will not be able to take advantage of the significant competitive advantage that comes with its incredible brand, its distribution network – hundreds of stores (potential car dealerships) sprinkled all over the world – its know-how in battery management, its design prowess, and its i-ecosystem.


We still own a little bit of Apple stock but have sold most of what we owned at current prices. Maybe Apple’s augmented reality products will become a huge success, or maybe the company is working on a brand new category of products that we have not even imagined. It is all possible.


In making investment decisions you never have perfect information. Apple is no exception. At today’s valuation we are paying for genius – Apple’s ability to successfully create and dominate a new, large product category. While the company is run by very talented people who will do a great job getting us excited about the categories of products they are already in, the company’s genius died with Steve Jobs.


Read addition thoughts on Apple, here.


I am the CIO at Investment Management Associates, which is anything but your average investment firm. (Seriously, take a look.)



I wrote two books on investing, which were published by John Wiley & Sons and have been translated into eight languages. (Even in Polish!)



In a brief moment of senility, Forbes magazine called me “the new Benjamin Graham.” (They must have been impressed by the eloquence of the Polish translation.)



Smitten by this article? Don’t let your love remain unrequited. Sign up here to get my latest articles in your inbox.



Monday, July 24, 2017

Five Pieces Of Tech Nostalgia That Shaped The Future

Although many of the devices listed below may be confined to your garages or dusty drawers, as Visual Capitalist"s Chris Matei notes, the influence they had on modern technology is pretty much unsurpassed.


Today’s infographic from Safe Company is a throwback to the 1980s and 1990s, making us nostalgic for the heyday of these popular gadgets.





TECH GOES MOBILE


The gadgets of the 80s and 90s were all about taking existing technology and making it more enjoyable while on the go, rather than solely being useful in the home or office. Even if that meant devices that were “portable” in name only, it was a huge step forward.


Devices like the Game Boy, Walkman, early Nokia phones, and other mobile technologies helped lead engineers to solve the problems that would lay the ground for today’s “world in the palm of your hand”. Improving power consumption efficiency, developing new battery types, reducing size, creating screens that were readable in a variety of light conditions, and even opening up the demand for aftermarket accessories were among these advancements.


BROADENING MEDIA ACCESS


The latter 20th century will be remembered for democratizing access to all kinds of information, both for work and for play. Technologies of the 90s set a precedent for the bite-sized span of modern digital attention. Microsoft’s Encarta encyclopedia suite allowed comprehensive keyword search before the optimization of online alternatives. Simply type a word, and get every piece of information related to it – without the need to purchase updated versions including new data each year. It sounds almost comical to tout these as features in the age of Google, but compare Encarta to the alternative: carrying around a set of Encyclopedias!


On the leisure side, the wildly faddish Tamagotchi feels like a forebear of 2010-era mobile games – cleverly designed to create a cycle of short, addictive bursts of play with a low cost of access. The ever beeping, cutesy reward loop of caring for your Tamagotchi may have annoyed a generation of parents, but it inspired a whole genre of bite-size digital entertainment.


Even the Walkman launched a new frontier of access to media through the creative possibilities of mixtape-making, bootlegging, and sharing tapes. I’m sure anyone who grew up in the 80s and 90s had a shoebox full of favorite tracks taped from radio and vinyl… or was that just me?


OLD TECH, LASTING IMPACT


Though it is easy to downplay the quaint technologies that came nearly thirty years ago, we can’t ignore that its influence is in the DNA of the devices and digital interactions we encounter every day. Go back through your closets, dig out your Game Boy, and take a trip back in time to remember the curiosities and comforts of old-school tech!

Saturday, February 11, 2017

Amazon Discloses Iranian Transactions That May Have Violated US Sanctions, Warns It May Be "Penalized"

In a 10-K filed on Friday afternoon, Amazon disclosed that certain transactions and business ties with Iran may have violated U.S. sanctions, warning that it may be penalized after a regulatory review of the activities.


In the "Other Contingencies" section of its 10-K, Jeff Bezos" company had determined that, between January 2012 and December 2016 it had "processed and delivered orders of consumer products for certain individuals and entities located outside Iran covered by the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act or other United States sanctions and export control laws. The consumer products included books, music, other media, apparel, home and kitchen, health and beauty, jewelry, office, consumer electronics, software, lawn and patio, grocery, and automotive products."


The world"s biggest online retailer also said that it has "voluntarily reported these orders to the United States Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and the United States Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security." and said it will cooperate with a review by the agencies, "which may result in the imposition of penalties."


As Bloomberg, which first spotted the violation, explains, the violations are the result of then-President Barack Obama"s signature of the ITRA in 2012, meant to strengthen trade restrictions on Iran and try to persuade the country to stop its nuclear activities. This law imposes civil penalties and takes other action against foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies engaging in transactions with Iran. In January 2016, the U.S. lifted many of the economic sanctions tied to the nuclear program.


Amazon further clarified the violations which consisted of consumer products sold to individuals and unspecified groups controlled or owned by the Iranian government, among which "consumer products valued at approximately $50 for an Iranian embassy located in a country other than Iran; consumer products valued at approximately $1,300 for an individual designated under Executive Order 13224; consumer products valued at approximately $2,400 for an entity owned or controlled by the Iranian government; and consumer products valued at approximately $250 for an individual who may have been acting for an entity designated under Executive Order 13382 and owned or controlled by the Iranian government. The consumer products included books, other media, apparel, home and kitchen, jewelry, office, toys, consumer electronics, software, health and beauty, pet products, and lawn and patio."


The company also said that is was "unable accurately to calculate the net profit attributable to these transactions" and said it does "not plan to continue selling to these accounts in the future."


The statement concludes with Amazon"s declaration that its "review is ongoing and we are enhancing our processes designed to identify transactions associated with individuals and entities covered by the ITRA."


Why come clean now, and disclose violations that took place as far back as 2012?


Perhaps because Amazon, along with many other tech companies, was a key catalyst behind the recent successful lawsuit against the Trump administration"s immigration executive order. While it is unknown if AG Sessions (or Trump himself) will retaliate against said companies, Jeff Bezos, who has a long "history" with Trump, decided not to take the chance.