Blue Privilege: Cop Gets Speeding Ticket After Running Over Innocent Man, Killing Him

York County, VA – Blue Privilege is rearing its head again in the case of a homeless man struck and killed when an on-duty cop unnecessarily sped through a 35 mph zone on a rainy night. For a normal citizen, this would likely bring a charge of involuntary manslaughter or vehicular homicide. But for Officer Scott George, it means nothing more than a speeding ticket.

York Daily Record reports that George was doing 13 miles over the speed limit, in dark, rainy conditions that would normally call for reducing one’s speed. He was on a non-emergency call to investigate a retail theft, when he struck 74-year-old Raymond Updegraff, a homeless man known as “Rayme” around the area.

A state police investigation concluded that Officer George’s actions only violated traffic rules – not the safety of pedestrians. George promptly pleaded guilty to speeding and has since returned to duty.

In the 14-page rationalization, District Attorney Thomas Kearney wrote:

“Using the definition of ‘probable cause,’ one must ask the question as to whether it is ‘more likely than not’ that the act of travelling 13 miles per hour over the speed limit on a rainy night was a direct or likely cause of the death. In other words, was the death the predictable, expected, likely result of the speeding? The author (Kearney) concludes in the negative believing the requirement for causation cannot be established beyond a reasonable doubt.

“Traveling 13 miles per hour at night time, in the rain, is certainly not a prudent course of action. However, neither does it fit the definition of ‘reckless’ or ‘grossly negligent’ conduct beyond a reasonable doubt. While there exists a deviation from the standard of conduct society expects (traveling at or below the speed limit), the deviation is not a gross deviation.”

Had roles been reversed, it’s safe to assume the average person would easily be charged with manslaughter, vehicular homicide or worse for running over a police officer, even off-duty. The “justice” system far too often proves to be arbitrary, with one’s status being the deciding factor in handing down punishment.

READ MORE:  Graphic Video Shows Cowardly Cops Break into Man"s Home and Kill His Dog After it Ran Away

Blue privilege is becoming so pervasive that states, with the backing of the Trump administration intent on a “law and order” crusade, are enacting ‘Blue Lives Matter’ laws that make yelling at cops or resisting arrest hate crimes.

When cops kill unarmed homeless people – who are often mentally ill – these deaths are routinely treated as “justifiable.” We have documented numerous cases of cops being let off the hook for attacks on homeless people that would be considered barbaric by any rational standard.

Updegraff’s family said they have not received so much as an apology from Officer George. He declined to be interviewed by investigators if state troopers were going to read Miranda rights, and instead provided a written statement.

In the statement, George said he was “not in any hurry” when he killed Updegraff, and said, “The first and only time I saw the pedestrian was immediately before impact with the corner of my car.”

George’s attorney stated that George “has expressed his deepest sympathy for the loss of Mr. Updegraff’s life. He insisted they could have contested the traffic ticket, but by pleading guilty George is “accepting responsibility and providing legal closure for Mr. Updegraff’s family.”

In a final insult, the attorney wrote, “People generally don’t want to accept responsibility for their own actions in today’s society; he did.”

DA Kearney characterized George’s actions as “slight negligence” and there was no reckless conduct in speeding down a dark road on a rainy night. It will be interesting to see if the same rationale is applied in future cases where the perpetrator is a non-cop.

Ohio Accidentally Legalized Running Red Lights, State Doesn’t Turn Into Chaos

Ohio — A bill signed into law this week gives Ohio drivers the green light — to run red lights — seriously.

When a traffic light turns red, you’re obligated to stop your vehicle and wait until it turns green again — unless you live in Ohio, where, this week, running red lights was legalized.

Sufficiently sloppy language in a new law intended to allow bicyclists to treat red lights as stop signs actually permits motorists — at least for the time being — to run a red light in certain situations, and not be ticketed by police.

Because bikes and other light means of transportation do not alert traffic signal weight sensors used at many lights in Ohio, lawmakers sought to permit those who would ordinarily be forced to wait indefinitely to run a red light when safe to do so — but the law accidentally also makes the same provision available for motorists.

“House Bill 154 was introduced in order for riders who believe they have been undetected by the sensors to cross an intersection at their best judgment, much like a stop sign,” RT explains.

“What this bill was designed to do was, in that situation, is allow the bicyclist to make a decision that it’s clear to proceed and go ahead and move through the red light,” Ohio State Patrol Lt. Robert Sellers told Columbus NBC affiliate WCMH-TV.

Sellers advised the legal permission slip to run red lights won’t be around for long — politicians are working to correct the language to specify bicycles with new legislation — so motorists, although legally allowed not to, should treat red lights as they always have.

In the interim, there is a bit of a catch — because legislators intended to compensate for broken traffic lights, motorists caught by police running a red must prove in a court of law the signal was malfunctioning.

“They’ve left a little wiggle room in this,” attorney Steve Palmer told WCMH-TV. “You could argue that the detector wasn’t working or you didn’t think it was working and you could honestly believe that in good faith and comply with this law without stopping at a red light.”

But drivers can still be cited — despite the lax nature of the ostensively impermanent law — particularly for gunning it through a red light, if doing so results in an accident, if the action is otherwise unsafe, or if it cannot be proven the signal was broken.

“Just because there’s this law written, presumably to protect bicyclists, I don’t think that gives any of us the green light, so to speak, to run the red light,” Palmer continued.

While many Ohioans likely welcome the new provision, law enforcement hasn’t exactly cozied to the idea due to concern for driver, cyclist, and pedestrian safety — and confusion over when to issue citations.

Columbus Police Sgt. Nick Konves warned legislators in February the law “makes enforcement and prosecution very difficult and nearly impossible,” reports the Norwalk Reflector.

Where Ohio’s new law flirts with the arbitrariness of traffic regulation, some European cities have altogether done away with traffic lights, signs, lines, curbs, and rules in a radical attempt to make the streets safer for everyone and reduce the number of accidents.

And it worked.

READ MORE:  Homeless Woman Arrested and Charged with Theft for the "Crime" of Charging Her Cell Phone

Called ‘shared space,’ this open city plan would seem counterintuitive to Americans, but the fascinating concept instead fosters caution through, essentially, disorientation. Drivers, pedestrians, cyclists, buses — anyone using the undefined space has to watch for everyone else.

Rather than the pandemonium portrayed in grainy film from the early days of motor vehicles, the shared space concept forces safety and caution by default.

CNN reported years ago the “town of Drachten in the Netherlands was one of the first to experiment the concept in 2002 by removing nearly all traffic signals with the aim of reducing accidents and improving both the town’s quality and popularity. Despite increases in traffic volumes, accident numbers fell from 8.3 per year between 1994 and 2002 to an average of just one per year in 2005.”

In 2008, the German town of Bohmte followed suit, and — where the town had once experienced serious vehicle accidents weekly — in the first four weeks, not a single crash was recorded. In Bohmte, the Daily Mail reported at the time,

“Only two rules remain — drivers cannot go above 30 mph, the German speed limit for city driving, and everyone has to yield to the right, regardless of whether it is a car, a bike or a mother with a pushchair.”

Perhaps Ohio — rather than appending its red light law — should instead consider relegating its traffic lights to the dust bin.