The US Gov’t Killed More Civilians This Month Than All Terrorist Attacks in Europe Over the Last 12 Years

Every time a terrorist attack occurs in Europe, it is met with an abundance of media coverage, and each victim is mourned by the public on a grand scale. However, the concern for the loss of innocent life appears to be almost nonexistent when the United States kills more civilians in one month than terrorist attacks in Europe have killed in the last 12 years.

A group monitoring the Syrian conflict reported on Friday that airstrikes launched by the United States-led coalition in Syria have killed 472 civilians from May 23 to June 23.

In the last 30 days, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that the provinces with the largest death tolls were Deir Ezzor with 222 civilian deaths, including 84 children, and Raqqa with 250 civilian deaths, including 53 children. The Observatory also noted that the latest figure is more than double the previous month, which was around 225 civilian deaths.

As The Free Thought Project has reported, the U.S.-led coalition entered the city of Raqqa for the first time on June 6, in the name of driving out the Islamic State. However, the first few days of the offensive resulted in reports of the coalition using a cluster of airstrikes including illegal chemicals such as white phosphorus on a city with a population of around 200,000 people.

While the U.S. claims its purpose is to defeat ISIS, its actions have been questionable. As Americans celebrated Father’s Day on Sunday, the U.S. shot down a Syrian warplane that was targeting the militants. In response, Russia announced that it is halting cooperation with the U.S. and its allies.

READ MORE:  Saudi Drill or Syrian Invasion? 350,000 Soldiers, 20,000 Tanks & 2,500 Warplanes Amass Near Syria

Just before the dramatic increase in airstrikes, a terrorist attack killed 22 people in Manchester, England, on May 22. Not surprisingly, the Islamic State was eager to take responsibility for the attack.

Secretary of Defense James Mattis used the attack to justify the increase on May 28, claiming that the U.S. had “accelerated” the tactics it was using in Iraq and Syria and is now using a policy of “annihilation.”

“Manchester’s tragic loss underscores the purpose of your years of study and training at this elite school. We must never permit murderers to define our time or warp our sense of normal. This is not normal … Our strategy right now is to accelerate the campaign against Isis. It is a threat to all civilized nations. And the bottom line is we are going to move in an accelerated and reinforced manner, throw them on their back foot. We have already shifted from attrition tactics, where we shove them from one position to another in Iraq and Syria, to annihilation tactics where we surround them. Our intention is that the foreign fighters do not survive the fight to return home to North Africa, to Europe, to America, to Asia, to Africa. We’re not going to allow them to do so. We’re going to stop them there and take apart the caliphate.”

The Manchester Attack is just one example of a loss of innocent life that has been exploited by western media and used for political gain. The loss of 22 innocent lives in England was used by the U.S. to justify going on to take nearly 500 innocent lives that have been blatantly ignored by the media.

READ MORE:  BREAKING: Syria Accuses Israel of Bombing Airport, Vows to Retaliate

Following the Manchester Attack, an attack near London Bridge in June killed eight civilians, bringing the total up to 30 deaths so far in 2017.

In 2016, terrorist attacks in Germany, France and Belgium killed 130 civilians.

In 2015, terrorist attacks in France and Macedonia killed 155 civilians.

In 2011, terrorist attacks in Norway and Belarus killed 92 civilians.

In 2005, a terrorist attack in England killed 52 civilians.

When looking at the last 12 years in Europe, terrorist attacks have taken the lives of 459 civilians. That is still less than the at least 472 civilians that were killed by the U.S. in Syria, just in the last month.

Despite the fact that Americans’ tax dollars are funding the war that has created the sharp increase in civilian deaths, the overwhelming concern that exists among the media and U.S. politicians when it comes to the loss of innocent life in Europe, has been virtually nonexistent when it comes to the loss of innocent life in Syria.

Theresa May’s Electoral Strategy – Fear-Mongering

(image: Reuters/Luke MacGregor)

The only terrorist threats Brits, other Europeans and Americans need fear is from their own governments, no others.

In the wake of the May 22 Manchester blast, Britain’s home secretary Amber Rudd warned about members of an alleged terrorist network still at large – despite no evidence suggesting anything of the kind exists.

Previous high-profile terrorist attacks in Britain, elsewhere in Europe and America were false flags, Manchester most likely the latest.

Instead of the incident helping Theresa May in the polls as she hoped, she’s slipping significantly. One poll showed her lead over Corbyn at five points, four others ranging from a two to six-point advantage, a week-and-a-half before snap elections

Though still likely to win, things appear shaping up to be a close race, a surprise outcome possible – not what May imagined when calling for snap elections on April 18.

Post-9/11, GW Bush’s approval rating soared from around 50% to about 90% overnight. Post-Manchester, May’s sunk.

University of Strathclyde professor of politics John Curtice believes she’s “certainly the overwhelming favorite to win, but crucially we are in the territory now where how well is uncertain.”

“She is no longer guaranteed to get the landslide majority that she was originally setting out to get” – a surprise outcome possible.

If she fails to decisively best David Cameron’s 2015 12-seat majority, her gamble will have failed, her mandate weakened, Tories more vulnerable to losing next time around.

Campaigning suspended post-Manchester was resumed on Friday, focusing heavily on security, Corbyn using it to his advantage instead of May as expected.

Everything reported about alleged suicide bomber Salman Abedi, his family members and associates is suspect, May’s fear-mongering strategy not turning out as expected.

So far, 11 arrests were made, individuals still in custody, despite no evidence connecting them to terrorism. Rudd claiming ISIS wants young Brits “weaponize(d)” is rubbish, an accusation with nothing credible supporting it.

At the same time, lots more incidents like Manchester are likely, in Europe and America, all likely part of a scheme to justify imperial wars and convince people to believe sacrificing freedom enhances security, not realizing they’re losing both.