Showing posts with label fraudulent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fraudulent. Show all posts

Monday, November 6, 2017

Most Scientific Research Of Western Medicine Untrustable And Fraudulent, Say Insiders And Experts (VIDEO)

Most Scientific Research Of Western Medicine Untrustable And Fraudulent, Say Insiders And Experts (VIDEO) | fraudulent-scientific-research1 | Big Pharma Corporate Takeover Medical & Health Multimedia Science & Technology Sleuth Journal Special Interests

The fraudulent scientific research of Big Pharma is rife, and has been acknowledged as untrustable by medical journal editors, professors, doctors, government officials and former Big Pharma insiders.


Fraudulent scientific research is rife throughout the world due to the power of monetary influence wielded by Big Pharma, the giant cartel of multinational pharmaceutical corporations started over 100 years ago by the Rockefellers. This fraudulent scientific research is now so widespread and pervasive it is become an open secret. There is a long list of medical journal editors, doctors and professors on the “outside”, former Big Pharma employees and executives on the “inside”, as well as government officials somewhere in between, who have stepped forward as whistleblowers and acknowledged the fraud. Money buys favorable research. Period. This is not really surprising, given the history of Rockefeller Western medicine and the fact that Big Pharma’s business model is based on “managing” disease, “treating” symptoms and keeping patients on the hamster wheel, rather than actually healing them completely.



Everyone Knows How the “Game” Works


Whistleblower Dr. Peter Rost, former vice president of Pfizer, a giant Big Pharma company, spelled it out. In the video clip embedded above, taken from the documentary One More Girl, he reveals that everyone knows how the “game” works:



“Universities, health organizations, everybody that I have encountered … are out there …. begging for money. (Big Pharma corporations) use that money to basically buy influence … (Big Pharma provides) grants for various kinds of research … make sure they (scientific researchers) became beholden … Everyone obviously knows this is how things work.”


“They (scientific researchers) are not going to continue to get money unless they’re saying what you (i.e. Big Pharma) want them to say. They know it, you know it, and it’s only maybe the public that doesn’t know it.”



In this way, the almost the entire medical scientific community has been compromised and has become thoroughly untrustworthy.


Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by Medical Journal Editors and Professors


Look at what numerous key experts are saying about this epidemic of fraudulent scientific research. Dr. Richard Horton is the current editor-in-chief of the British Lancet journal, which is respected as one of the best peer-reviewed medical journals in the world. He came out and stated:



“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”



Then look at what Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), had to say about the pervasive fraudulent scientific research:



“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines … I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”



Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, a professor of disease prevention at Stanford University, published a study in a PLoS One paper entitled Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. He found that research conclusions are less likely to be true when study samples sizes are too small, when effect sizes are even smaller, and when there are major variances in study designs, definitions, outcomes and analytical modes. He highlighted the corrupting influence of Big Pharma and concluded that:



“There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false … it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true.”



Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by other Big Pharma Whistleblowers


Most Scientific Research Of Western Medicine Untrustable And Fraudulent, Say Insiders And Experts (VIDEO) | fraudulent-scientific-research-quackery | Big Pharma Corporate Takeover Medical & Health Multimedia Science & Technology Sleuth Journal Special Interests

The pervasive fraudulent scientific research shows that most “solid medical evidence” may in fact be quackery.


Fraudulent scientific research has also been exposed by former executives and employees of the Big Pharma machine. In addition to Dr. Peter Rost, another Big Pharma whistleblower include Dr. John Virapen, author of Side Effects: Death. Confessions of a Pharma-Insider, who admits in this book that he “bribed a Swedish professor to enhance the registration of Prozac in Sweden.” Virapen worked for 35 years in the pharmaceutical industry internationally (most notably as general manager of Eli Lilly and Company in Sweden) where he was responsible for the marketing of several Big Pharma drugs (all of them with side effects). He exposes how Big Pharma invests more than USD$50,000 per physician per year to entice them to prescribe their products, how more than 75% of leading scientists in the field of medicine are “paid for”, and how illnesses are invented by the pharmaceutical industry to increase profit.


Another Big Pharma whistleblower is Gwen Olsen, a former Big Pharma sales rep who really knew how to push for a hard sell. She reveals the underhanded tactics she was taught by Big Pharma executives to ensure doctors were prescribing their drugs. After her niece killed herself while taking antidepressants, she changed her tune and exposed the tactics. Olsen admits that she used bribery and personal connections to sell Big Pharma meds, because she found it very difficult to sell drugs on their own merit, that the true purpose of pharmaceutical drugs is social control, that Big Pharma buys up real cures to disease, or sues companies not to release genuine cures. She also reveals how drug effects or side effects were often separated to avoid full disclosure, e.g. if the effect was on the CNS (Central Nervous System) then Big Pharma would break it down to say dizziness, fatigue, etc. so effects would look smaller.


Sadly, patients were harmed or killed due to Olsen’s (and other drugs reps like her) intentional sidestepping/misinforming physicians about a drug’s effects. Olsen refers to the “Revolving Door Syndrome”, meaning patients who are hospitalized continue to come back repeatedly, and each time lose more of their bodily functions. The drugs were brain damaging, could induce violence and were slowly killing them. Meanwhile, many drugs are found to be not more efficacious than a sugar pill (placebo).


Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by Governmental Whistleblower Too


Lastly, it is also useful to note that fraudulent scientific research has been acknowledged by governmental officials too. Dr. William Thompson of the CDC (the US Center for Disease Control) made headlines last year when he bravely came forth to publicly admit that he had cooked the books and fudged the data regarding vaccines. Here is an excerpt of his public statement from August 27th, 2014:



“My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998.


I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”



Many people were harmed (or killed) by this instance of fraudulent scientific research, especially young black baby boys under the age of 3. Consequences for Thompson or the CDC for this fraudulent scientific research? Basically none. Obama gave him legal immunity – but that’s not surprising since he also singed the NDAA (claiming the right to imprison any American indefinitely without charge or trial) and initiated his weekly Kill Lists.


Don’t Fall for Appeals to “Scientific” or “Clinical” Research when Fraudulent Scientific Research is So Rife


The lesson in all this is clear: don’t believe it when you are told by anyone involved with the Western Medical Establishment that their products are based on sound, valid, scientific, clinical evidence. Fraudulent scientific research is so widespread you can’t know anything for sure. Maybe you have to use Western Medicine, or maybe you don’t, but don’t go in blindly believing everything you’re told.


Sources:


*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrCizlAOBAo


http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960696-1.pdf


http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2004/jul/15/the-truth-about-the-drug-companies/


http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124


*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8ZFUq5hr7E


*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICnKzBMkV9Q


The Big One: CDC whistleblower goes public Now


Obama Admin Grants Immunity To CDC Scientist That Fudged Vaccine Report…Whistleblower Plans To Testify Before Congress



The post Most Scientific Research Of Western Medicine Untrustable And Fraudulent, Say Insiders And Experts (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Sunday, November 5, 2017

Most Scientific Research Of Western Medicine Untrustable And Fraudulent, Say Insiders And Experts (VIDEO)

Most Scientific Research Of Western Medicine Untrustable And Fraudulent, Say Insiders And Experts (VIDEO) | fraudulent-scientific-research1 | Big Pharma Corporate Takeover Medical & Health Multimedia Science & Technology Sleuth Journal Special Interests

The fraudulent scientific research of Big Pharma is rife, and has been acknowledged as untrustable by medical journal editors, professors, doctors, government officials and former Big Pharma insiders.


Fraudulent scientific research is rife throughout the world due to the power of monetary influence wielded by Big Pharma, the giant cartel of multinational pharmaceutical corporations started over 100 years ago by the Rockefellers. This fraudulent scientific research is now so widespread and pervasive it is become an open secret. There is a long list of medical journal editors, doctors and professors on the “outside”, former Big Pharma employees and executives on the “inside”, as well as government officials somewhere in between, who have stepped forward as whistleblowers and acknowledged the fraud. Money buys favorable research. Period. This is not really surprising, given the history of Rockefeller Western medicine and the fact that Big Pharma’s business model is based on “managing” disease, “treating” symptoms and keeping patients on the hamster wheel, rather than actually healing them completely.



Everyone Knows How the “Game” Works


Whistleblower Dr. Peter Rost, former vice president of Pfizer, a giant Big Pharma company, spelled it out. In the video clip embedded above, taken from the documentary One More Girl, he reveals that everyone knows how the “game” works:



“Universities, health organizations, everybody that I have encountered … are out there …. begging for money. (Big Pharma corporations) use that money to basically buy influence … (Big Pharma provides) grants for various kinds of research … make sure they (scientific researchers) became beholden … Everyone obviously knows this is how things work.”


“They (scientific researchers) are not going to continue to get money unless they’re saying what you (i.e. Big Pharma) want them to say. They know it, you know it, and it’s only maybe the public that doesn’t know it.”



In this way, the almost the entire medical scientific community has been compromised and has become thoroughly untrustworthy.


Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by Medical Journal Editors and Professors


Look at what numerous key experts are saying about this epidemic of fraudulent scientific research. Dr. Richard Horton is the current editor-in-chief of the British Lancet journal, which is respected as one of the best peer-reviewed medical journals in the world. He came out and stated:



“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”



Then look at what Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), had to say about the pervasive fraudulent scientific research:



“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines … I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”



Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, a professor of disease prevention at Stanford University, published a study in a PLoS One paper entitled Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. He found that research conclusions are less likely to be true when study samples sizes are too small, when effect sizes are even smaller, and when there are major variances in study designs, definitions, outcomes and analytical modes. He highlighted the corrupting influence of Big Pharma and concluded that:



“There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false … it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true.”



Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by other Big Pharma Whistleblowers


Most Scientific Research Of Western Medicine Untrustable And Fraudulent, Say Insiders And Experts (VIDEO) | fraudulent-scientific-research-quackery | Big Pharma Corporate Takeover Medical & Health Multimedia Science & Technology Sleuth Journal Special Interests

The pervasive fraudulent scientific research shows that most “solid medical evidence” may in fact be quackery.


Fraudulent scientific research has also been exposed by former executives and employees of the Big Pharma machine. In addition to Dr. Peter Rost, another Big Pharma whistleblower include Dr. John Virapen, author of Side Effects: Death. Confessions of a Pharma-Insider, who admits in this book that he “bribed a Swedish professor to enhance the registration of Prozac in Sweden.” Virapen worked for 35 years in the pharmaceutical industry internationally (most notably as general manager of Eli Lilly and Company in Sweden) where he was responsible for the marketing of several Big Pharma drugs (all of them with side effects). He exposes how Big Pharma invests more than USD$50,000 per physician per year to entice them to prescribe their products, how more than 75% of leading scientists in the field of medicine are “paid for”, and how illnesses are invented by the pharmaceutical industry to increase profit.


Another Big Pharma whistleblower is Gwen Olsen, a former Big Pharma sales rep who really knew how to push for a hard sell. She reveals the underhanded tactics she was taught by Big Pharma executives to ensure doctors were prescribing their drugs. After her niece killed herself while taking antidepressants, she changed her tune and exposed the tactics. Olsen admits that she used bribery and personal connections to sell Big Pharma meds, because she found it very difficult to sell drugs on their own merit, that the true purpose of pharmaceutical drugs is social control, that Big Pharma buys up real cures to disease, or sues companies not to release genuine cures. She also reveals how drug effects or side effects were often separated to avoid full disclosure, e.g. if the effect was on the CNS (Central Nervous System) then Big Pharma would break it down to say dizziness, fatigue, etc. so effects would look smaller.


Sadly, patients were harmed or killed due to Olsen’s (and other drugs reps like her) intentional sidestepping/misinforming physicians about a drug’s effects. Olsen refers to the “Revolving Door Syndrome”, meaning patients who are hospitalized continue to come back repeatedly, and each time lose more of their bodily functions. The drugs were brain damaging, could induce violence and were slowly killing them. Meanwhile, many drugs are found to be not more efficacious than a sugar pill (placebo).


Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by Governmental Whistleblower Too


Lastly, it is also useful to note that fraudulent scientific research has been acknowledged by governmental officials too. Dr. William Thompson of the CDC (the US Center for Disease Control) made headlines last year when he bravely came forth to publicly admit that he had cooked the books and fudged the data regarding vaccines. Here is an excerpt of his public statement from August 27th, 2014:



“My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998.


I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”



Many people were harmed (or killed) by this instance of fraudulent scientific research, especially young black baby boys under the age of 3. Consequences for Thompson or the CDC for this fraudulent scientific research? Basically none. Obama gave him legal immunity – but that’s not surprising since he also singed the NDAA (claiming the right to imprison any American indefinitely without charge or trial) and initiated his weekly Kill Lists.


Don’t Fall for Appeals to “Scientific” or “Clinical” Research when Fraudulent Scientific Research is So Rife


The lesson in all this is clear: don’t believe it when you are told by anyone involved with the Western Medical Establishment that their products are based on sound, valid, scientific, clinical evidence. Fraudulent scientific research is so widespread you can’t know anything for sure. Maybe you have to use Western Medicine, or maybe you don’t, but don’t go in blindly believing everything you’re told.


Sources:


*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrCizlAOBAo


http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960696-1.pdf


http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2004/jul/15/the-truth-about-the-drug-companies/


http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124


*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8ZFUq5hr7E


*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICnKzBMkV9Q


The Big One: CDC whistleblower goes public Now


Obama Admin Grants Immunity To CDC Scientist That Fudged Vaccine Report…Whistleblower Plans To Testify Before Congress



The post Most Scientific Research Of Western Medicine Untrustable And Fraudulent, Say Insiders And Experts (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Ripoff Alert: No Aloe was Found in These Aloe Vera Gel Products

Over the summer, like a lot of people, I purchase a bottle of aloe vera gel because, despite my best efforts, I always get sunburned when I work in the garden. Now I know where I’ll never be buying it from again: CVS. Don’t bother picking up a bottle at Walmart or Target, either. A Bloomberg News report from late 2016 shows that none of these store-brands actually contain any aloe.


Source: Bloomberg News

All of the products listed aloe barbadensis leaf juice on the label as either the #1 ingredient or #2 (behind water). However, tests revealed that not a single one contained so much as a drop of aloe vera. [1]


Aloe’s 3 chemical markers – acemannan, malic acid, and glucose – were nowhere to be found in the tests for Walmart, Target, and CVS products conducted by a lab hired by Bloomberg. Instead, the products contained a cheaper ingredient called maltodextrin, a sugar sometimes used to imitate aloe.


Maltodextrin is a white powder usually found in processed foods as a thickener or filler, and in pharmaceuticals as a binding agent. It is also found in canned fruits, snacks, cereal, desserts, instant pudding, sauces, and salad dressings, as well as artificial sweeteners, as it contains fewer calories than sugar. [2]


Read: Health Benefits of Aloe Vera


Aloe vera gel sold at other stores was also shown to be potentially adulterated. The aloe gel sold at Walgreen’s contained 1 chemical marker, malic acid, but not the other 2. Ken Jones, an independent industry consultant based in Chapala, Mexico, says that means the presence of aloe vera can’t be ruled out. [1]


The Testing Process


Bloomberg News tested:


  • Walmart’s Equate Aloe After Sun Gel with pure aloe vera

  • Target’s Up & Up Aloe Vera Gel with pure aloe vera

  • CVS Aftersun Aloe Vera Moisturizing Gel

  • Walgreens Alcohol Free Aloe Vera Body Gel

The lab – which requested anonymity to preserve its business relationships – used a testing technique called nuclear magnetic resonance. In addition to maltodextrin, the test revealed other additives, such as triethanolamine, an emulsifier. Lactic acid, a component which indicates degraded aloe vera, was not detected in any of the samples.


In Denial



Spokesmen for Walmart, CVS, and Walgreen’s said their suppliers confirmed to them that their products were authentic. Target declined to comment. The 4 retailers have 23,000 stores, combined.


The gels supplied to Walmart, Target, and Walgreen’s were all produced by Fruit of the Earth, a Fort Worth, Texas-based aloe brand founded in 1980. The aloe used by Fruit of the Earth was supplied by Ormond Beach, Florida-based Concentrated Aloe Corp., which claims it uses fair trade, organic aloe that is farmed and processed in Guatemala.


Both companies dispute Bloomberg’s findings.


John Dondrea, Fruit of the Earth’s general counsel, said:


“We’ve been in the business a long time and we know where the raw ingredients come from. We stand behind our products.’’


A Walmart representative said:


“We hold our suppliers to high standards and are committed to providing our customers the quality of products they expect. We contacted our suppliers and they stand behind the authenticity of their products.” [3]


In a statement, Walgreen’s said:


“The quality, safety and integrity of our products is of highest priority to us, and we carefully select suppliers who share those priorities as well. Our supplier has assured us that the product’s ingredients match its labeling.”


Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. Well brand alcohol free Aloe Vera Body Gel is displayed for a photograph in Tiskilwa, Illinois, U.S., on Saturday, Nov. 19, 2016. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg

“Tests Not Reliable”


Tim Meadows, president of Concentrated Aloe Corp., argues that nuclear magnetic resonance is not a reliable test for cosmetics because the presence of multiple ingredients can interfere with test results. He said there is no way to accurately test for the presence of aloe vera in finished products. [1]




Meadows also argued that maltodextrin isn’t an adulterant because it can be used in the drying process. Additionally, he said, some methods of processing aloe can remove acemannan, but that doesn’t mean the product is fake. He said:


“Acemannan has been misinterpreted. The cosmetics industry requires highly processed aloe. How that affects acemannan is anybody’s guess.’’


But James Neal-Kababick, director of Flora Research Labs in Grants Pass, Oregon, which tests and researches natural products, said that while it’s true that nuclear magnetic resonance isn’t designed to test for aloe vera in cosmetic products, the lab results still suggest that aloe “is not a major component” of the product.


In fact, Jones reviewed some of the tests and said he didn’t see evidence of aloe or interfering substances.


The Tests Didn’t End There


But the testing didn’t end there, and the results were mixed:


  • ConsumerLab.com tested Fruit of the Earth brand Aloe Vera 100% Gel using nuclear magnetic resonance and found no evidence of aloe.

  • A competing brand, Aubrey Organics, tested the brand and said it did contain markers that indicate aloe. 

As for the aloe gel sold at CVS, the product is supplied by Product Quest Manufacturing LLC of Daytona Beach, Florida. The firm declined to comment.


Target Corp. brand Aloe Vera Gel is displayed for a photograph in Tiskilwa, Illinois, U.S., on Friday, Nov. 18, 2016. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg

Legal Ramifications


Last summer, lawsuits were filed against the 4 retailers by several law firms after separate testing also found no aloe vera in the store-brand products. The firms are seeking class-action status and restitution for all the people who say they got ripped off by the retailers.


In a complaint filed in September in Illinois on behalf of plaintiffs represented by 10 law firms, attorneys wrote:


“No reasonable person would have purchased or used the products if they knew the products did not contain any aloe vera.”


No Reliable Standards


According to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, cosmetic labels should be truthful. Great, right? Who is making sure that companies are being honest? Well, no one. [4]


In a statement, the FDA said that “under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, FDA requires cosmetics marketed on a retail basis to consumers to bear a list of ingredients, in descending order of predominance. However, like other cosmetic labeling, this information is not subject to premarket review by FDA.”


Cosmetic companies can register their products with the FDA’s Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program, but as the name implies, they don’t have to.


The investigation is from 2016, but it’s still a solid reminder to check into any aloe vera products you may purchase for this year’s summer sun.


Sources:


[1] Bloomberg News


[2] Popsugar


[3] Fortune


[4] Mashable



Storable Food


About Julie Fidler:


Author Image
Julie Fidler is a freelance writer, legal blogger, and the author of Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or the Absolute Worst. She lives in Pennsylvania with her husband and two ridiculously spoiled cats. She occasionally pontificates on her blog.

Friday, December 16, 2016

Obama’s birth certificate proven a forgery, fraudulently fabricated document, by forensic investigators on two continents




PHOENIX, Ariz. (INTELLIHUB) — President Barack H. Obama’s birth certificate has been proven to be a “forgery,” a fraudulently “fabricated document,” law enforcement officials and forensic investigators concluded with high certainty after an intense five year investigation.


Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and lead investigator Mike Zullo along with forensic experts on two continents have concluded that President Obama’s birth certificate is not authentic and are seeking to take the matter up with the federal government.


Investigators presented evidence during a press conference Thursday detailing how, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that “nine points of forgery in which words, letters and hand-placed date stamps had been digitally copied and pasted” from another Hawaii State birth certificate to create the fake image posted on the official WhiteHouse.gov website.


Investigators say that the first “five points of forgery were brought over in one group” from another birth certificate while the 4 remaining points were brought over separately to create the complex “forgery.”


birth certificateWhiteHouse.gov

Investigator Mike Zullo told the press, “We don’t know if he [Obama] is a natural born citizen or not” but said the document stands on its own as an elaborate forgery.


Utilizing forensic techniques, both old and new, investigators in both the U.S. and Italy came to the same conclusion about the documents authenticity.


Zullo told the press that his investigation was thwarted early on when officials in Hawaii were unwilling to cooperate on several occasions and even threatened him and others investigating the matter with arrest.


Sheriff Arpaio told the press that his team of experts are holding out on additional and “more sensitive information” which he would not talk about publicly at this time.


If taken through the proper channels and pursued by congress and federal officials Barack Obama may be charged with treason, which holds a penalty of ‘life in prison,’ at a future date.


Sheriff Arpiao plans on turning over the investigation to federal officials within the next month.


Related: Obama’s dark shady past exposed


©2016. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.







Threats of violence, foul language, bullying, etc. will not be tolerated and may be flagged.