Showing posts with label Internet Censorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet Censorship. Show all posts

Sunday, April 15, 2018

Google’s File on You Could be 10 Times Bigger than Facebook’s – Here’s How you Can Download it

Google


 


By Arjun Walia, Collective-Evolution


The perception of Facebook is at an all time low, and they’re receiving a lot of bad press. Despite the fact that it’s probably well deserved, Facebook has still provided a great opportunity for free speech, the sharing of information we never really hear from the mainstream media, and an overall general voice and measurement regarding the planet’s perception of various events. It seemed to be a democracy of information, but unfortunately, the government has now implemented multiple measures to combat what’s become known as “fake news.” As a result, peoples choice has been taken away from them with regards to what they want to see. The government has stepped in and is playing the role of fact checker, and information verifier.


Edward Snowden had a great response to this, saying that more censorship is not the answer, but instead less censorship, more transparency and critical thought. Have we really become so docile that we need the government to tell us what is a real piece of information and what is fake? Don’t get me wrong, the elite have been doing this for decades, but the world is currently going through a massive transformation, and one aspect of that transformation is to become aware of what was once dark, and bring it to light. Manipulation of information and the spread of false information has always been a big issue, but more so with mainstream media…


The war on fake news only began when alternative media outlets were sharing information, with credible sources, that basically threatened the control structure and perception of the global elite, or those who we deem our ‘leaders.’


When it comes to Facebook and their involvement in massive, and what seems to be, illegal data collection, Snowden remarked:


“Businesses that make money by collecting and selling detailed records of private lives were once plainly described as “surveillance companies.” Their rebranding as “social media” is the most successful deception since the Department of War became the Department of Defense…”


It’s pretty crazy, and it’s also noteworthy to mention that Facebook has the likes of Regina E. Dugan on their team. She’s an American businesswoman, inventor, and technology developer. She served as the 19th Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), then moved over to Google, and now she has a strong position at Facebook.


Connections like this are also, in my opinion, just weird as it doesn’t feel like all that goes on is disclosed.


What’s really going on inside this company and does Zuckerberg really have any say? Or has it simply become a tool for the national security state, collecting data to essentially allow the elite to pin any sort of ‘mishap’ under one’s name, building a case, and taking them down. The scary thing is, if they want dirt on you, they could probably create it. Is Zuckerberg the ‘fall guy?’



It has been said by many close to the company that Facebook’s agendas go far beyond a simple social media network connecting people. Facebook’s former vice president of user growth stated Facebook was “ripping society apart” and ex-Facebook chief Sean Parker said Facebook was built to exploit people’s weaknesses.


But apparently it isn’t just Facebook playing this game, it’s Google, YouTube and other SM networks too. Julian Assange discusses the close relationships between Google and the NSA in his 2014 book: When Google Met WikiLeaks:


Around the same time, Google was becoming involved in a program known as the “Enduring Security Framework” (ESF), which entailed the sharing of information between Silicon Valley tech companies and Pentagon-affiliated agencies “at network speed.” Emails obtained in 2014 under Freedom of Information requests show Schmidt and his fellow Googler Sergey Brin corresponding on first-name terms with NSA chief General Keith Alexander about ESF Reportage on the emails focused on the familiarity in the correspondence: “General Keith . . . so great to see you . . . !” Schmidt wrote. But most reports overlooked a crucial detail. “Your insights as a key member of the Defense Industrial Base,” Alexander wrote to Brin, “are valuable to ensure ESF’s efforts have measurable impact.”


Dylan Curran


Dylan Curran, a privacy consultant ended up downloading all of the data stored on him by Facebook and Google. According to him, the data archive from Google was almost ten times larger than Facebook, and it dated back a decade revealing shocking details about the IT expert.


Below is a tweet he made late last month and here is the thread, under the tweet below, where he shared 20 shocking pictures and examples of exactly what he meant; it’s quite revealing.


Google


According to Curran, the download file was 5.5 G, which is almost 10 times larger than Facebook’s collection of his data.


As website Anti-Media points out:


“Curran’s Google report contained an incredible amount documentation on his web activity, going back over a decade. But perhaps more importantly, Google had also been tracking his real-life movements via his smartphone device or tablet. This included fairly random places he’d frequented, many of the foreign countries and cities he visited, the bars and restaurants he went to while in these countries, the amount of time he spent there, and even the path he took to get there and back.”


With all of this being said, it’s been known that Google silently tracks you everywhere you go and creates a map of your physical movements through its Location History feature. You can deactivate it by going to your timeline and adjusting the preferences.


You can turn off location tracking, voice searches, and other features; you can view and edit your preferences; you can adjust your public profile, and you can download Google’s data hoard to see what they see.


To delete all of your data from not only Google but also a variety of other online services, you can:



  1. Go to Deseat.me and sign in with a Gmail address

  2. Look down the list of synced accounts and decide which you want to delete and which you want to keep

  3. Click the button


What’s The Takeaway?


There are multiple takeaway messages here, one is the fact that we’ve been living in a mass surveillance state, and the justifications for it seem to be a complete lie. It’s not so much for national security purposes, but more so control purposes.


So, at least we are waking up and starting to realize what’s really going on here. Whistleblowers like Edward Snowden have been a big help with that.


When we are not aware, we really leave ourselves open to a lot manipulation. When we are aware, this can’t really take place like it used to. The global elite are having a much harder time slipping products and and so called services, in the form of national security measures, every singe year.


They require our complacency, so our simple awareness, and our state of consciousness, plays a huge role in manifesting a new physical reality.


Secondly, this is nothing to fear. It’s easy to take a “oh no, big brother is watching me” type of stance, but it’s been happening long before it was even disclosed. Fear isn’t really the appropriate action, but it’s an understandable response. When we are told our world doesn’t really operate the way we’ve been taught, and become aware of new information that’s not really ‘nice,’ it can be mentally difficult.


The best part is overcoming that fear, and realizing that everything happening on our planet, including all of this mass surveillance, is simply something coming to the forefront of human consciousness because it doesn’t really resonate with the masses.  It’s actually serving a tremendous opportunity, one of many, for the human race to wake up, it’s nothing to fear, and in some cases, we can celebrate that it’s no longer a ‘conspiracy’ theory.


This is instead an opportunity for us to be aware about and speak up about.


The post Google’s File on You Could be 10 Times Bigger than Facebook’s – Here’s How you Can Download it appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Monday, April 2, 2018

Microsoft Warns Customers: Watch What You Say When Using Our Products – Or Else

Microsoft Warns Customers: Watch What You Say When Using Our Products - Or Else | free-speech-tape-mouth | Free Speech Internet Censorship Science & Technology Special Interests


By Jake Anderson, The Anti-Media | 


We can now add a new Microsoft policy of punishing account users who use “offensive language” while logged into one of their products or services to the growing list of draconian measures employed by tech companies to police online content.


In a release summarizing the new policy, which will go into effect May 1, Microsoft stated:


“In the Code of Conduct section, we’ve clarified that use of offensive language and fraudulent activity is prohibited.”


Microsoft stated that they may temporarily suspend or boot offending users permanently from their products. They also reserve the right to search through user content.


The company’s code of conduct was written to crack down on spam, the transmission of malware, child exploitation, and illegal activity. So far, Microsoft has not been explicit about what will constitute offensive language.


Users expect the policy to have the biggest effect on Xbox Live players, who are known to troll each other during games. But other Microsoft customers worry the new code of conduct could restrict free speech on platforms like Skype and OneDrive.


Civil rights activist Jonathan Corbett challenged the company in a blog post, writing:


“So wait a sec: I can’t use Skype to have an adult video call with my girlfriend? I can’t use OneDrive to back up a document that says ‘fuck’ in it? What’s clear here is that Microsoft is reserving the right to cancel your account whenever they feel like it.”


While users commenting on Reddit claim the policy is really nothing new, many Microsoft customers and tech users fear the move is a pretext for censoring people. It adds to an intensifying debate regarding tech companies and social media companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google tweaking their algorithms to control page reach and enacting measures that restrict creative expression and free speech. Some journalists claim the Big 5 tech companies — Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon — as well as other information gatekeepers, are taking censorship cues from Washington lawmakers and acting as the de facto face of repressive government.


The post Microsoft Warns Customers: Watch What You Say When Using Our Products – Or Else appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Reality Check: Internet Purge of Dissenting Voices? (VIDEO)

Reality Check: Internet Purge of Dissenting Voices? (VIDEO) | internet-social-media-censorship | Internet Censorship Special Interests US News


By Ben Swann, Truth in Media


Is there an Internet purge of conservative voices or voices of dissension online? Some say yes, and that the purge is being pushed by YouTube (owned by Google) and Facebook and Twitter.


We’ve heard about censorship before, but is what is happening now an all-out purge?


Let’s give it a Reality Check you won’t get anywhere else.



You might be a fan, you might be disgusted by him. But there is no doubt that InfoWars founder and radio host Alex Jones is a lightning rod. His YouTube channel has over 2.2 million subscribers and more than 33,000 videos.


Just days ago, Jones claimed that YouTube had begun a process of taking his channel down.


On March 3, CBS reported, “Jones tweeted that he had ‘set up a new channel’ that the ‘SPLC,’ or the Southern Poverty Law Center, wanted censored. In one of the videos on the channel called ‘InfoWars Censored,’ Jones said, ‘We’re live on Facebook, on Twitter, on Periscope, but we cannot go live on the Alex Jones channel — it’s been frozen for the third time in one week.’”


YouTube confirmed to CBS News that some advertisers had asked that their ads be pulled from Jones’ channel but there was “no plan”…“at present” to remove the channel completely.


Of course, all of this comes after YouTube announced in December that it would hire 10,000 new moderators to flag content. And those moderators have been flagging at stunning rate.


But more than flagged, YouTube is outright banning channels. Some YouTube channels recently complained about their accounts being pulled entirely with no advance warning. In this latest case, YouTube seems to have been flagging content that was either deemed as pro-gun or conservative content.


According to The Verge, “YouTube indicated that as the platform ramps up human-powered moderation efforts, new moderators may have mistakenly removed or flagged right-wing videos and channels. Bloomberg reported the news this afternoon, quoting a YouTube spokesperson saying that ‘as we work to hire rapidly and ramp up our policy enforcement teams throughout 2018, newer members may misapply some of our policies resulting in mistaken removals.’ The spokesperson said that YouTube’s policies had not changed, and that ‘we’ll reinstate any videos that were removed in error.’”


So it’s not a conspiracy.


There is no question that human moderators were, in fact, pulling down “right wing” or “conservative content.”


But why? What is really happening here? Because YouTube’s push to control video content, just like Facebook is nothing new. In fact, it has been happening for some time.


Mike Cernovich tweeted that a video he has posted of Antifa protesters chanting death threats at a protest in DC was taken down by YouTube because it violated community guidelines.


To be clear, the video was about 30 seconds of an actual protest in DC. And the language of the protesters violated community guidelines? That is called news, YouTube. But it was not allowed.


Mike Adams, the founding editor of NaturalNews.com, announced March 3:


“YouTube has now deleted the entire Health Ranger video channel, wiping out over 1,700 videos covering everything from nutrition, natural medicine, history, science and current events.”


So why is all of this happening? Is it all because YouTube is trying to control the Internet? Maybe not.


There is, in fact, a very coordinated effort by a number of organizations, like Media Matters for America and the Southern Poverty Law Center to silence voices with which it does not agree.


I know this first hand, as these organizations have attacked me personally trying to silence my voice.


Full disclosure here, I am ideologically a libertarian, neither on the left or the right. But according to these groups, I am “alt-right”—a dog whistle which means white nationalist. I am not, not at all. But that doesn’t stop them from slandering me.


The goal of these organizations is to silence dissent. Not just from the right, but from the left as well.


Anyone who is not part of the establishment structure is attacked.


Facebook is going through a very similar process right now, with increased pressure to control voices on its platform.


Remember in 2016 it was widely reported by several outlets, including Gizmodo:


“Facebook workers routinely suppressed news stories of interest to conservative readers from the social network’s influential ‘trending’ news section, according to a former journalist who worked on the project. This individual says that workers prevented stories about the right-wing CPAC gathering, Mitt Romney, Rand Paul, and other conservative topics from appearing in the highly-influential section, even though they were organically trending among the site’s users.”


Twitter does the same thing. In December, Twitter announced strict enforcement of new rules on “hateful conduct and abusive behavior.”


According to Politico, “That provoked the first objections from some on the right who called the steps a ‘#twitterpurge.’ The company conceded at the time that ‘we may make some mistakes and are working on a robust appeals process.”


So what you need to know is that the YouTube and Facebook purges are not a new problem.


Mainstream media networks and newspapers have routinely pushed narratives in their newsrooms for decades. We all know that.


Yet, for some reason, Facebook and YouTube, which have far more influence than those networks, have chosen to bend to pressure and try to control the narratives on their platforms.


YouTube says its mission is, “to give everyone a voice and show them the world.” But the truth is, they are not.


The problem for any dissenting voice is that if you are using your voice on someone else’s property, i.e., YouTube or Facebook, you will never have control of it. Which is why the next frontier must be decentralized platforms.


Platforms like Dtube and Steemit, built on blockchain, will be future of how content, the good the bad and ugly, will be stored. And the efforts to silence dissenting voices, will actually be the undoing of YouTube and Facebook.


As for those of us who have a voice, you and me, well… if you do not object to YouTube and Facebook purging voices with which you do not agree, then just wait.


Because if you are silent now, it may soon be the voices you do agree with that will also be silenced. And who then will be left to come to that defense?


That’s Reality Check. Let’s talk about it right now on Facebook and Twitter.


The post Reality Check: Internet Purge of Dissenting Voices? (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

List of Banned and Censored YouTube Channels – Various Themes Emerge

List of Banned and Censored YouTube Channels – Various Themes Emerge | censored-YouTube-channels | Free Speech Internet Censorship Special Interests US News

This list of banned and censored YouTube channels shows exactly what the Establishment doesn’t want you to be investigating, exploring, discussing and thinking about.


The list of banned and censored YouTube channels is rapidly increasing, as Google-owned YouTube has been carrying out a censorship blitz to strike many long-standing, hugely popular channels from its platform. Alphabet-Google-YouTube is a giant corporation, and corporations are run for one purpose (profit), so from one perspective, this censorship spree seems self-defeating, since they are deleting many popular channels. Some of these had huge followings of between 100,000 and 500,000 (or more), which may cost YouTube money in the short term. However, to understand this censorship purge you need to understand that the Hidden Hand or the dark force which controls the New World Order also controls Alphabet-Google-Youtube, and is clearly using its reach and power to suppress alternative thought.


YouTube, Google, Facebook, Twitter: Publicly-Funded “Private” Corporations


At first glance, it may seem fair that social media giants like YouTube get to censor people, because they are private companies not public/government companies, right? It’s their platform, right? Not exactly. These social media companies are more like private-public partnerships. They would never have gotten off the ground were it not for the government’s seed money, especially through MIC agencies like DARPA and the CIA. Additionally, these companies are given massive tax breaks every year. Alphabet-Google in particular has a very close relationship with the US Government. In fact, Google just got caught collaborating with the Department of Defense to use AI in analyzing drone footage, according to this Activist Post article by Jake Anderson.


Is it fair for these companies to take so much public help and support, then turn around and disregard the right to free speech as enshrined in the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution and elsewhere?


Censorship on the Fakest of Pretexts


Make no mistake about their actions; this is censorship, pure and simple. The censored YouTube channels were all given fake pretexts and false reasons, but the pattern of censorship is undeniable. Alphabet-Google-YouTube found ways to delete entire channels on the basis that they were breaking YouTube’s nebulous “community guidelines”, or that they were in breach of copyright (relying on allegations of accusers). For some or many of these, YouTube even went back 3+ years to find some piece of supposedly incriminating evidence in a video that had previously been perfectly fine. Any excuse will do.


In a similar vein, the Facebook account of David Icke (with 700,000+ followers) mysteriously disappeared and was taken down for over a week before being magically reinstated. Facebook later said it was a “mistake.” Sure it was. Everyone in the Alternative Media / Independent Media is now fully aware that if they haven’t already been censored, they are about to be. It’s only a matter of time as the Establishment, via its Establishment platforms, purges any anti-Establishment view.



List of Banned and Censored YouTube Channels – Various Themes Emerge | censored-youtube-channels-library-censor-jfk-quote | Free Speech Internet Censorship Special Interests US News

Censored YouTube channels: JFK spoke out against censors.



Using the Censorship Purge Against the Censors


Every crisis has an opportunity, and although this censorship purge will affect the Independent Media in the short term, there are good things to come from it. Firstly, it will force alternative content creators to migrate away from the giant corporate platforms to other places where their views, writing, speech, art and content will never be censored. Many great platforms already exist which are trying to find ways to reward content creators, such as Minds and Steemit. Secondly, as we shall see below, the NWO censors are overplaying their hand by purging so much; the list of censored YouTube channels reveals a pattern of content. So now we can see what they don’t want us to know …


List of Censored YouTube Channels


Thanks to Reddit, we have this list of censored YouTube channels that was posted on March 1st, 2018. However, it is an incomplete list and does not include some big YouTube channels that were censored recently, such as those of Waking Times and Activist Post (where I also write as a contributor). Since march 1st, other YouTube channels have been deleted (such as Natural News / Mike Adams). Some of the channels have been reinstated, but the writing is on the wall; it’s only a matter of time before they get permanently scrapped. Here is the list:



  1. According to Joe

  2. Adamic Amethyst

  3. AmericanEveryman

  4. animal farm

  5. Anti-School

  6. aplaintruth

  7. Arthur Koestler

  8. ashtonbirdie

  9. Back to the Constitution

  10. Barry Soetoro

  11. Blackstone

  12. Bombard’s Body Language *

  13. Brave New World

  14. Charles Walton

  15. Charlton

  16. Colin Flaherty

  17. Crow777 *

  18. Darkness at Noon

  19. David Seaman

  20. Defango *

  21. Destroying the Illusion

  22. Dr. Jerome Corsi

  23. Dr. of Common Sense

  24. Dustin Nemos

  25. Edgy Sphinx

  26. Elliott Marxx

  27. Eric Dubay

  28. Factions of Freedom

  29. FAKE NEWS REPORT

  30. Free Radio Revolution Revived

  31. FromDeath2Life

  32. Gematrianator

  33. HowISeeTheWorld

  34. InTruthbyGrace

  35. Jake Morphonios

  36. Jay Myers

  37. Jim Marrs

  38. Joanne Steen

  39. Johnny Supertramp

  40. JYW420

  41. Kalika from “For the People”

  42. Kearn Kearsy

  43. Kevin K Johnston

  44. Kinningan

  45. Lawarewolf

  46. Liberty Columnist

  47. Mag Bitter Truth

  48. Matrix Breakout

  49. Max Malone

  50. McFly

  51. McSimonius

  52. mgtow is freedom

  53. Mlordandgod

  54. Murdoch Murdoch

  55. Operation Hal

  56. Peekay

  57. Peekay Boston

  58. Psyched Substance

  59. Redd Dog Truth

  60. Richie Allen Show

  61. RichieFromBoston*

  62. Ron Johnson

  63. Russian Vids

  64. Sargon of Akkad *

  65. The Black Child

  66. The Kepler Telescope Channel

  67. The Ochelli Effect

  68. The Paulstaul Service

  69. Titus Frost

  70. TruthmediaRevolution

  71. Urban Moving

  72. Victurus Libertas VL

  73. WAP tech

  74. Willy Myco


As soon as I saw this list, I immediately recognized many of these channels as superb content providers. The owners of these channels are undoubtedly free thinkers willing to push the boundary of what is known and question everything.


Some very interesting themes emerge. Apparently, these are the topics that the NWO manipulators would rather you didn’t think about (topics in bold, censored YouTube channels in parentheses):


– False Flag shootings, including False Flag Hoaxes (Free Radio Revolution Revived, Peekay, Peekay Boston, The Paulstaul Service)


– Flat Earth (Eric Dubai, aplaintruth)


– Nanotechnology/BioweaponsDirected Energy Weapons (aplaintruth)


– Gematria (Gematrianator) (Gematria is the art of assigning or decoding a system of numerical values to words in the belief that words with identical numerical values bear some relation to each other)


– Space fakery / Moon as a Hologram (Crow777 [whom I interviewed here], Russian vids)


– Various Aspects of the Global Conspiracy, e.g. ZionismGeopoliticsExtraterrestrials and the Hidden History of Humanity (Jim Marrs, Richie Allen show, MLordandGod, Destroying the Illusion)


– Fake News (FAKE NEWS REPORT)


– SatanismHollywoodPedophilia (Jay Myers, who process quality conspiracy analysis)


[Many of these topics are covered on The Freedom Articles: here are some links for those that want to research them further:


http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/category/false-flag-staged-terror-events/


http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/category/zionism/


http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/category/geopolitics/


http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/category/ets-ufos-and-the-alien-agenda/


http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/category/satanism/


http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/category/pedophilia/]


Yes, Alphabet-Google-YouTube has a distinct leftwing bias, due to its own ideology (as exposed in the incident where Google fired James Damore), and has been employing the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center, Rothschild connected) to purge rightwing channels. However, this censorship blitz is far beyond left vs. right. It’s all about limiting the possible range of human thought to keep the Control System in place.



List of Banned and Censored YouTube Channels – Various Themes Emerge | censored-YouTube-channels-legal-implications | Free Speech Internet Censorship Special Interests US News

Censored YouTube channels: a tweet by Paul Watson. What are the legal implications?



Final Thoughts


Let’s use this purge of censored YouTube channels to find better platforms that decentralize power, reward content creators and pledge to support free speech no matter what. One solution is the launch of Real.Video as announced by Mike Adams. There are many others out there.


There is no reason we have to let the unlimited diversity of the internet – and the unlimited diversity of humanity – be stymied and controlled, or funneled into giant megalithic platforms that only seek to serve the Establishment.


Sources:


*https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/816mzt/big_alphabetical_list_of_banned_youtube_channels/


*https://www.activistpost.com/2018/03/government-conscripts-google-military-industrial-complex.html


*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/dissolving-old-description-of-reality/


The post List of Banned and Censored YouTube Channels – Various Themes Emerge appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Independent Journalist Exposes How Social Media Companies Are Systematically Silencing Conservative Voices

Independent Journalist Exposes How Social Media Companies Are Systematically Silencing Conservative Voices | Ben-Swann-YouTube-Screenshot | Internet Censorship Special Interests US News


Ben Swann has done it again.  A new video that he just released about the stunning purge of conservative voices that we are now witnessing has already been viewed more than 24,000 times on YouTube alone.  I have been writing about all of this censorship quite a bit recently as well, but up until now I have not revealed the true extent to which it has hit me personally.  Like President Trump and other prominent conservatives, engagement on my personal Facebook profile has fallen dramatically.  We are working like mad to keep engagement up on our official Facebook campaign page, but it has been a real battle, and today Facebook just banned me again from posting to groups for a few days.  The funny thing is that I had barely shared anything recently.  On Twitter, I have been told by a social media expert that my account has been “shadowbanned”, and that probably explains why engagement on Twitter is only a small fraction of what it once was.  Of course dozens of other prominent conservatives are suffering the same kind of censorship, and it is absolutely imperative that we stand up against this unprecedented assault on our ability to communicate with one another.


It has become quite obvious that the big social media giants want to systematically exclude any voices that they do not like from the marketplace of ideas.  In his new video, Ben Swann points a finger at the biggest offenders


“Is there an Internet purge of conservative voices or voices of dissension online?” Swann begins in a recent “Reality Check” report on the issue. “Some say yes, and the purge is being pushed by YouTube, owned by Google, by Facebook, and by Twitter.”


They don’t call them “the thought police”, but that is precisely what the small armies of “moderators” that the social media giants are hiring are turning out to be.  For example, late last year YouTube announced that it would bring on “10,000 new moderators” to “flag content”


“Of course, all of this comes after YouTube announced in December that it would hire some 10,000 new moderators to flag content,” Swann reported. “And those moderators have been flagging at a stunning rate.”


He noted further that in several cases the moderators were pulling entire channels “without any advance warning” whatsoever, and that most of those channels were deemed “either pro-gun or conservative.”


If you have not seen Swann’s new video yet, you can watch it here.  Following the video, other content creators commented on how they have been affected by the recent social media censorship…


-“Hey Ben, just thought I would share my story. I have now been removed from YouTube 6 times in the past few years. I am non-violent, don’t cuss, don’t show blood or gore, and I use mainstream media news clips that usually talk about these large shootings that are being used as a reason to change gun laws. I built my old channels to 10 thousand subscribers and 2.5 Million views twice, only to have my accounts removed.”


-“THEY DELETED MY 300K VIEWS VIDEO SHOWING HOW CNN LIED ABOUT THE CHEMICAL ATTACK IN SYRIA. IT’S HAPPENING, I GOT A STRIKE FOR IT.”


-“They even hit vdeos I had set to private that weren’t even viewable by the public. To keep my channel I deleted over 300 videos spanning back 2 years and that is lot counting the half dozen plus that YouTube yanked.”


-“I received 2 strikes in 48 hours on videos exposing crimes of the US government (that had been up for 2-3 years), which is what all my videos do. I deleted the videos from my channel to save this account for contact reasons but, It still might get deleted anyways.”


-“I deactivated my Facebook. They were instantly removing my comments. My comments had nothing to do with anything, but I did try to post a conservative video in a comment box and after that ALL of my every day comments were instantly removed and marked as spam. I am also Libertarian. I can’t believe Health Ranger’s channel was removed. I think it is awful what they are doing. Taking away support is fine, but don’t take down the channel!”


I believe that it is fundamentally un-American for social media giants to try to use their power to silence conservative voices.


These big tech companies built empires by allowing everyone to have a voice, but now they are systematically attempting to exclude conservatives from the conversation, and we should all find that extremely offensive.


If you want someone in Washington that will fight as hard as he possibly can against this kind of censorship, I hope that you will help us win our race for Congress on May 15th


Donate By Credit Card Online: https://secure.anedot.com/michaelsnyderforcongress/donate


Donate By Paypal: https://donorbox.org/michael-snyder-for-congress


Donate By Check: Make your check out to “Michael Snyder For Congress” and send it to the following address…


Michael Snyder For Congress

PO Box 1136

Bonners Ferry, ID 83805


We are in the middle of the final money bomb of the 2018 primary campaign, and you will be able to track the progress of the money bomb on Swampbomb.com.


If you live in north Idaho, I hope that you will come out for the kickoff event for the last 60 days of our campaign in Sandpoint on the evening of March 15th.  And you can see the remainder of my speaking schedule for the month of March right here.


We are in a battle for the soul of our nation, and the left is fighting dirty.


All throughout history the left has always sought to silence dissenting voices when they have taken power, and now they are trying it in this country.


Of course we are not about to let that happen, and the left is in for a very rude awakening during the 2018 mid-term elections.


The post Independent Journalist Exposes How Social Media Companies Are Systematically Silencing Conservative Voices appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

RED ALERT!!-Truth and Art TV Channel Under Attack By YouTube! (VIDEO)

RED ALERT!!-Truth and Art TV Channel Under Attack By YouTube! (VIDEO) | striek-two-youtube | Free Speech Internet Censorship Multimedia US News


History is upon us. It’s happening everywhere. YouTube channels with conservative views, patriotic views, Trump supporting views and any view that disagrees with the Liberal Left, globalist ideology are all being deleted systemmatically. Truth and Art TV is no different. My channel has no received TWO quick “Community guidelines” strikes over the past 3 days for videos posted over 2-3+ years ago! This leaves the Truth and Art TV YouTube channel ONE strike away from being permanently deleted. The Truth and Art TV YouTube channel is now FROZEN for 2 weeks. During this time I cannot upload any videos. Please help spread the word about my Truth and Art TV BACKUP CHANNEL LINKED HERE Let’s continue to FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT against YouTube and the deep state. They cannot silence us and all of their tactics will backfire on them exponentially.



The post RED ALERT!!-Truth and Art TV Channel Under Attack By YouTube! (VIDEO) appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Are The Social Media Giants Trying To Steal The 2018 Elections By Censoring Conservative Websites?

Are The Social Media Giants Trying To Steal The 2018 Elections By Censoring Conservative Websites? | Steal-Public-Domain | Free Speech Internet Censorship Politics Special Interests


Nobody is disputing the fact that YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other social media giants are censoring conservative material.  In fact, this is probably the largest purge of conservative voices in the history of the Internet.  Obviously this is going to cause large numbers of people to stop using their platforms, so why would they do this?  Well, to some conservatives the answer is obvious.  These social media giants watched Donald Trump use their platforms extremely effectively in 2016, and many believe that they are absolutely determined to never let that happen again.  In fact, Mike Adams of Natural News is completely convinced that there is a concerted effort by these social media giants to steal the 2018 elections…


The realization is suddenly obvious: The Google / YouTube selective “censorship rampage” that has targeted conservative websites and content creators is a brazen, illegal scheme to interfere with U.S. elections and steal the 2018 mid-terms.


The systematic silencing of conservative views is necessary, of course, for Democrats to win enough seats to gain control of the U.S. House of Representatives after the mid-term elections. Once control is established, Democrats will immediately move to impeach President Trump. Although the Senate would not likely prosecute that impeachment, the mere achievement of the U.S. House declaring “impeachment” would be enough to convince most brainwashed news consumers that Trump is somehow a guilty criminal (nobody will remember that Bill Clinton was also impeached by the House). From there, the 2020 presidential election is also stolen, and Democrats land their selected tyrant in the White House just in time for Ginsberg’s retirement from SCOTUS.


If voices on the left were being censored to the same degree as conservative voices, it would be really hard to make such an argument.


But the truth is that the numbers show that conservative voices are being hit extremely hard by the censorship while liberal publishers have been mostly “unaffected”


Facebook’s January 12 announcement that it would begin to de-prioritize news publishers and their posts in users’ News Feeds has had a surprisingly profound and partisan impact. According to The Outline’s analysis of Facebook engagement data obtained from research tool BuzzSumo, conservative and right-wing publishers (such as Breitbart, Fox News, and Gateway Pundit) were hit the hardest in the weeks following the announcement, with Facebook engagement totals for February dropping as much as 55 percent for some, while the engagement numbers of most predominantly liberal publishers remained unaffected.


And this even applies to politicians as well.  For example, President Trump’s engagement on Facebook has fallen 45 percent since the algorithm change…


The algorithm change caused President Donald Trump’s engagement on Facebook posts to plummet a whopping 45%.


In contrast, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) do not appear to have suffered a comparable decline in Facebook engagement.


Top conservative Facebook pages with daily traffic in the millions have seen 75% to 95% drop in traffic.

Young Cons, Western Journalism, SarahPalin.com,Independent Journal ReviewRight Wing News, and several others have seen dramatic loss in traffic.


Needless to say, my website (http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/) has been affected as well.


So what can we do?


We can fight back.  One of the primary ways that we can do that is by electing pro-Trump candidates all over the nation in 2018.  Right now I am engaged in an extremely close race with three guys that did not want Donald Trump to win the Republican nomination in 2016, and I need your help to win on May 15th.


It is fundamentally wrong for the social media giants to pick winners and losers in the marketplace of ideas.  I will fight online censorship as hard as I can in Washington, and if you believe in what we are trying to do I hope that you will stand with us.


Donate By Credit Card Online: https://secure.anedot.com/michaelsnyderforcongress/donate


Donate By Paypal: https://donorbox.org/michael-snyder-for-congress


Donate By Check: Make your check out to “Michael Snyder For Congress” and send it to the following address…


Michael Snyder For Congress

PO Box 1136

Bonners Ferry, ID 83805


Whenever radical leftists have taken power anywhere in the world, they have always tried to shut down free speech.


They want to follow the same formula in the United States, but we are not going to allow them to do that.


There are millions upon millions of red-blooded Americans that still greatly love this nation, and this silent majority is rising up to take our country back.


The post Are The Social Media Giants Trying To Steal The 2018 Elections By Censoring Conservative Websites? appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Modern Newspeak: How Internet Censors Are Making Sure You Hear Only One Side of the Story

Modern Newspeak: How Internet Censors Are Making Sure You Hear Only One Side of the Story | internet-censors | Free Speech Internet Censorship Politics Special Interests


It’s not breaking news that the internet censors have been hard at work to silence voices that are in opposition to the mainstream media agenda. But after the influence that social media had on the last election, things are going to a whole new level. The internet, that last bastion of truly free speech, isn’t very free anymore.


We’re watching the evolution of Newspeak right before our very eyes as the internet strives to silence any voices that oppose their carefully crafted stories of how guns are bad, there are 291 genders, and anyone who isn’t a liberal is an evil Nazi racist.


If you aren’t familiar with the term “Newspeak,” it’s from George Orwell’s prophetic novel, 1984.


“Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by eactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. . . . The process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there’s no reason or excuse for commiting thought-crime. It’s merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won’t be any need even for that. . . . Has it ever occcured to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?” (source)


YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook have all been participating in a full-on purge of not just conservative voices, but the voices of anyone who is loudly anti-establishment. Any internet personality who is pro-gun or anti-socialism can fully expect to be censored. If you go against the agenda, you will be silenced.


Apparently, we have become too discerning for their liking and we can’t be trusted to hear both sides of the story and decide what seems most accurate.


Let me preface this: It isn’t about being a fan of websites like Infowars or Natural News. It’s about being a fan of free speech. It’s about getting the truth instead of a carefully scripted narrative.


In this video, Ben Swann, who is mercifully back from a long, unexplained hiatus, gives us the facts on how the internet censors are striving to ensure we hear only one side of the story.



I’m certainly not in the same category as Mike Adams or Alex Jones, who have hundreds of thousands of followers, but even I have experienced this censorship. Facebook frequently refuses to allow me to pay to boost posts that might be controversial in nature, Back in 2016, I posted an article containing 2 videos, one of which was quickly removed from YouTube. It was about the threat of civil unrest to the Milwaukee suburbs after a cop killed a black man. The media portrayed the man’s sister as warmly trying to prevent the unrest, urging people not to burn down their own neighborhoods. But they cut her rant right before she urged people to burn down the suburbs instead. I quoted her as saying:


Burnin down sh*t ain’t going to help nothin! Y’all burnin’ down sh*t we need in our community. Take that sh*t to the suburbs. Burn that sh*t down! We need our sh*t! We need our weaves. I don’t wear it. But we need it. We need our food. We need our gas. Y’all wanna hurt somebody you take that sh*t further out! (source)


But somehow, I was the one who was in the doghouse for quoting what she said and showing both of the videos. My article was reported as “hate speech” a number of times and Facebook removed it. Not only did they remove it, they banned me from posting for a week, giving me a “warning” about hate speech. I also got put in Facebook jail once when someone asked what Godwin’s Law was and I used the word Nazi because it hurt someone’s feelings who was from Germany when I said the word “Hitler.” I could not make this stuff up.


A lot of you may be wondering why alternative media sources use social media at all, and the answer is – we have to if we want to be heard. If we want to be competitive and we want our stories to be out there, we must go where the people are. And there are millions of people on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.


But purges like this are why it’s particularly important that you sign up for email lists if you want to hear the real stories. (You can sign up for mine right here.) And even then, it isn’t a guarantee you won’t be the victim of censors. During the election, for research purposes, I signed up for both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s email lists. Clinton’s ended up in my inbox without fail, while Trump’s went to my spam folder, no matter how often I marked it as “not spam.”


This is something we have to stop now. We have to speak up and let these social media outlets know that we aren’t going to put up with their censorship and their control of the national narrative.


We’re watching 1984 unfold right before our very eyes.


The post Modern Newspeak: How Internet Censors Are Making Sure You Hear Only One Side of the Story appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Thursday, February 22, 2018

New YouTube Warnings: An Attempt to Dissuade Viewers From Watching RT, PressTV and More?

New YouTube Warnings: An Attempt to Dissuade Viewers From Watching RT, PressTV and More? | new-youtube-warnings | Internet Censorship Mainstream Media Propaganda Special Interests US News World News

New YouTube warnings warn you’re about to watch info / news funded by a foreign government. Is this an attempt to soft censor alternative views online?


New YouTube Warnings have been rolled out recently – but only on some channels, and mostly those which challenge the official narrative. Google (founded by Zionists Sergey Brin and Larry Page), now run by Zionist Eric Schmidt, owns YouTube (run by Zionist Susan Wojcicki). YouTube claims its goal is to “equip users with additional information to help them better understand the sources of news content that they choose to watch on YouTube,” according to Geoff Samek, senior product manager of YouTube News. However, is this the real point? Or is the idea to cast doubt in the viewer’s mind? To get the viewer to think: “Is this information real? Can I trust it? Is it more fake news?” When you watch a video now on YouTube from a media outlet that is not sanctioned by, and in line with, the Anglo-American-Zionist official perspective of the world, you may see one of these new YouTube warnings right beneath the video where the title used to be. The title has actually been pushed further down the page…


New YouTube Warnings on RT, PressTV and Other Alternative Channels


The new YouTube warnings were rolled out on Feb. 2nd 2018. When you go to the YT channel of Iran’s PressTV, you will see this:



“Press TV is funded in whole or in part by the Iranian government”



The warnings were being displayed on RT (Russia Today), however as of today they are not appearing. Has YouTube backed down? Just yesterday it used to say:



“RT is funded in whole or in part by the Russian government”



Some alternative, non-Western media outlets claim they have editorial independence. Is YouTube going to evaluate that claim? Funnily enough (or not), there are few such warnings for the American MSM. PBS (Public Broadcasting Service) gets this new YouTube warning:



“PBS is a publicly funded American broadcaster”


Large media outlets of Britain and Canada got the new YouTube warnings also:



“BBC is a publicly funded American broadcaster”

“CBC is a publicly funded American broadcaster”


But what about other major channels?


New YouTube Warnings: An Attempt to Dissuade Viewers From Watching RT, PressTV and More? | new-youtube-warnings-richard-salant | Internet Censorship Mainstream Media Propaganda Special Interests US News World News


US Establishment MSM Without New YouTube Warnings


However for the YouTube channels of CNN, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, Fox and others, there is no warning. Yet these media outlets, and many others around the world, have been infiltrated many decades ago. They are wholly owned by the CIA, ostensibly an arm of the American government, although in many ways above it. Operation Mockingbird was a CIA project to penetrate and covertly control the media. It began in the 1950s under then CIA director Allen Dulles, the very same one who had a key role in the hit on JFK.


Declassified files show how the CIA totally infiltrated the US MSM. It bought up journalists, reporters and newsmen, and once they were on the CIA payroll, it persuaded them to write CIA-sanctioned pieces, which were then inserted into TV, newspapers and journals everywhere as “news” when they were nothing more than lies and propaganda. Richard Salant, former President of CBS News, once said that our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.”


Former CIA Director William Colby confessed that “The Central Intelligence Agency owns anyone of any significance in the major media.”


Mockingbird was famously exposed in the 1975 Church Committee hearings (see an video excerpt here). Nothing much has changed today. Journalists worldwide are still on the payroll, and some were brave enough to talk about it, such as the late German reporter Udo Ulfkotte, who admitted he was being essentially forced to write anti-Russian pieces to better fit the New World Order narrative.


So why doesn’t YouTube give some warnings under the channels of the MSM, such as:


“CNN is funded in whole or in part by the CIA”


“NBC is funded in whole or in part by the CIA”


“MSNBC is funded in whole or in part by the CIA”


“ABC is funded in whole or in part by the CIA”


“Fox is funded in whole or in part by the CIA”


Don’t hold your breath waiting – you will suffocate.


New YouTube Warnings: An Attempt to Dissuade Viewers From Watching RT, PressTV and More? | new-youtube-warnings-colby-CIA | Internet Censorship Mainstream Media Propaganda Special Interests US News World News


Final Thoughts


Do you really think that the Alphabet-Google-YouTube behemoth want their viewers to be genuinely informed? That they care so much about you and just want to make sure you are getting unbiased news? Or is it more likely the new YouTube warnings are a thinly disguised effort by the technocracy to keep the internet free of alternative views by dissuading viewers from watching certain channels? Smells like more soft censorship. Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.


 


Sources:


*https://youtube.googleblog.com/2018/02/greater-transparency-for-users-around.html


*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDCfTIapds0


*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIaFkR9uriU


The post New YouTube Warnings: An Attempt to Dissuade Viewers From Watching RT, PressTV and More? appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.

Monday, February 5, 2018

U.S. Surveillance Grid is Crafted Nationally toward Global Integration

globalism1


Most of the time a headline is not enough, nor even a “wake-up” call from a Julian Assange or an Edward Snowden. Many times, the headlines or warnings are buried beneath a plethora of duplicitous distractions crafted by the Mainstream Media (MSM) that are tabloid in nature: sensationalism, not focused and objective reporting. But the passage of time tends to turn the conscientious into dullards and dim the memories until they are forgotten.


We all know how October 1, 2016, Obama turned over control of the Internet to ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers). Do you know what their slogan is? “One World, One Internet.”


Using the “social needs” portion of the Hierarchy of Needs pyramid…to foster groupthink and group cooperation, all of American society (from birth to death) is precisely controlled and funneled into a system that will enable the docility of subjects (citizens, if you prefer) and their transition into the global governance and the New World Order (NWO).


Here is a statement made by an ICANN board member regarding the transition from U.S. government control to “stewardship” by a corporation that is supposedly an NPO (Non-Profit Organization). Take note of the language.


“This transition was envisioned 18 years ago, yet it was the tireless work of the global Internet community, which drafted the final proposal, that made this a reality,” said ICANN Board Chair Stephen D. Crocker. “This community validated the multistakeholder model of Internet governance. It has shown that a governance model defined by the inclusion of all voices, including business, academics, technical experts, civil society, governments and many others is the best way to assure that the Internet of tomorrow remains as free, open and accessible as the Internet of today.”


As can be seen, the singsong language contradicts itself: “…multistakeholder model of Internet governance…”   “…a governance model…,”    “…the best way to assure…”  “…the Internet of tomorrow remains as free…as the Internet of today.”


The word “free” is used to describe the Internet in the same sentence as “Internet governance.” No liberty there…except the liberties they take in “taking care of all of this for us,” while they “take care of us,” no doubt. Games.  Games played by the stakeholders. Multistakeholder?  Would that be Prof. Van Helsing in Dracula? Or is it referring to the usual “conga line” of nabobs, such as oligarchs and their front-corporations, and the politicos. The sacred triumvirate of power-broker billionaires to own it all, elected thieves enriched by the billionaires to place it into law that oligarchs and politicos own and control it, and the religious silver-tongued swami’s (pick any denomination) to soothe the serfs and use sacred scripts to assure a smoothly-sailing servitude, with no say-so.


So, the current model of Internet governance assures us that the Internet will always be free…and that is why ICANN currently has one of their main offices in Beijing, right next to State Security of the People’s Republic of China.


Look deeply, and you can see it. A few years ago, L-1 Identity Solutions was tasked with the creation of biometric systems for passports and driver’s licenses by the U.S. government. Let’s take a quote out of Wikipedia to see what L-1 does:


“L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc. is a large American defense contractor in Connecticut. It was formed on August 29, 2006, from a merger of Viisage Technology, Inc. and Identix Incorporated. It specializes in selling face recognition systems, electronic passports such as Fly Clear, and other biometric technology to governments such as the United States and Saudi Arabia. It also licenses technology to other companies internationally, including China.”


How nice: multistakeholders, again. But wait! There’s more!  L-1 isn’t L-1 any longer: it was bought by Safran in 2011 for about $1 billion. This is a French company…a multi-subsidiary holding company, to be exact. “Identity management” is one of the cards they hold in their deck of activities. So, what about L-1 of Connecticut? Well, it shifted into Morpho, the security and identity division of Safran. And then Morpho “morphed” into OT (Oberthur Technologies) Morpho, still specializing in the digital security and biometrics as before.


But the big news in all of this is that an international firm has bought an American firm that is responsible for biometric and digital data in U.S. passports and driver’s licenses.  


In the past two weeks we saw the introduction of H.R. Bill 4760, that includes detailed and lengthy provisions for what amounts to the establishment of national ID cards and passports that ensure complete control of citizens before they exit the borders of the United States.


All these activities point toward a subtle movement and integration of the U.S. into an international interdependency that will eventually lead to all U.S. economic, social, and infrastructure systems being placed under foreign control…toward the abolition of American sovereignty and the destruction of U.S. borders, language, culture, and way of government.


By performing such actions slowly and incrementally, it keeps the activities out of the public eye and the forefront of scrutiny. Work, taxation, consumption, and entertainment…THX-1138 ad infinitum…until cage has been completely constructed. The power-brokers, oligarchs, nabobs, and religious leaders all have assured themselves a “seat at the table” after the United States is carved up, subjugated, and reduced in numbers.


To paraphrase their own words: governance to assure freedom.


You know, governance: all with the barrel of a gun to “help you with your compliance” in the same manner as the governing authorities “assure your freedom.” Night and day, they’re working nonstop to close the cage and implement these systems…while also working to maintain the stultifying theatrics of the Super Bowl, movies to escape from reality, and tabloid non-news to shape and mold public opinion.


Governments, politicians, corporations, and oligarchs do not do these types of things for no reason. Frog in the kettle. They are implementing a global system of surveillance and control, and the United States is the final obstacle for that global governance. The result will not be smiling stewardship…it will be totalitarianism with teeth…. rule by force, not government by consent.  Malthus, More, Marx…and “1984” by Orwell will be only fictitious in the scope of the narrative. The existence of the totalitarian State and all its facets described will be a reality, and when it’s in place, that boot Orwell imagined may very well be trampling upon the face of humanity forever.




Jeremiah Johnson is the Nom de plume of a retired Green Beret of the United States Army Special Forces (Airborne).  Mr. Johnson is also a Gunsmith, a Certified Master Herbalist, a Montana Master Food Preserver, and a graduate of the U.S. Army’s SERE school (Survival Evasion Resistance Escape).  He lives in a cabin in the mountains of Western Montana with his wife and three cats. You can follow Jeremiah’s regular writings at SHTFplan.com or contact him here.


This article may be republished or excerpted with proper attribution to the author and a link to www.SHTFplan.com.

Wednesday, January 31, 2018

Facebook and its Open War on Independent Media


(The Real Agenda News) Facebook excuses its censorship on a plea to “end disinformation” and “sensationalism” on the internet.


It will not be enough to have a large audience or be registered as a medium, Facebook wants to measure the trust that the media possess to prioritize their content on the social network.


As of Friday, more than 2 billion active service profiles will see 4% of content generated by professional pages instead of the current 5% in Facebook’s latest attempt to control what information people have access to and what information they are banned from seeing.


Starting next week, users will have a relevant role when it comes to choosing which media are the ones with the most preponderance, Facebook claims.


The company will ask you how much you trust a medium, with an emphasis on local media and the sources used.


Mark Zuckerberg announced the first changes to give more relevance to what was published by friends and family at the expense of the official pages of brands and media:


“Following the 2018 goal, we want to make sure that time on Facebook is a time well spent,” said Zuckerberg.


In a new message on his wall he explains that he is obsessed with quality information.


“There is too much sensationalism, misinformation and polarization in the world,” he points out as support for a decision that moves the waves in which the media live a little more.


“Social networks allow information to be disseminated faster than ever, but if we do not confront these problems we will end up expanding them,” he says.


The change not only affects media pages, but also the links that particular users put on their wall.


Just as Google does when pondering the value of a medium or page to make it appear before one domain or another, the so-called Google Rank, Facebook will create its own rating system to give more visibility, or less, depending on the reliability.


As in the case of Google, the quantities and ingredients are not provided to discover their secret sauce, as they like to call success formulas in Silicon Valley.


That is perhaps because that is how Facebook, Google and other social media manage to openly censor accounts and alternative media publications.


According to the calculations of the founder, the amount of news will decrease to 20%.


In the last year, the relationship between the media and Facebook has become blurred, especially at the political level, where they have been accused of having a bias in favor of both Republicans and Democrats.


Facebook maintains that this change and its weighting model will be based on objective data, but the size of the media or its political bias will not be taken into account.


Facebook claims that the decision to delegate to the community aims to provide objectivity to the decision:


“We have decided that it is the users who decide broadly what is the most objective”.


The director emphasizes that they will not show the results of the surveys, because it would not give a real version of the whole process.


There are several points that will have weight in this valuation system: the title, who writes it, who speaks and so on.


The post Facebook and its Open War on Independent Media appeared first on The Sleuth Journal.