Showing posts with label US Intelligence Community. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Intelligence Community. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

CIA Files Reveal Decades of US Intel on Iran Came from Hundreds of CIA Psychics

In January, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) bowed to public pressure and published millions of once-classified documents online, so people could browse them “from the comfort of your own home.” On the face of it, this is a win for transparency, but in classic bureaucratic fashion, the documents say a lot without really telling us anything useful.


They are more like an amusing trip through the eccentricities and failures of a spy agency that gained immense power after WWII through virtually unlimited funding and little oversight. Assassinations, coups, drug running, torture, and economic sabotage are not the subject of these documents, but there is plenty about UFOs, a Penthouse interview that never happened, various banal diagrams, and psychics.


That last subject is interesting in light of America’s tumultuous history with Iran, beginning in 1953 when the US and UK overthrew the democratically elected Mossadegh government, installing a puppet dictator to serve western interests.


US intelligence agencies and the Pentagon got their first chance to use the psychic program, initiated in 1975, after Iranian revolutionaries seized the U.S. embassy and took 52 US personnel hostage.


According to the Miami Herald:



“In an operation code-named Grill Flame, half a dozen psychics working inside a dimly lit room in an ancient building in Fort Meade, Maryland, on more than 200 occasions tried to peer through the ether to see where the hostages were being held, how closely they were guarded and the state of their health.



Officially, the psychics worked for U.S. Army intelligence. But the documents in the CIA database make it clear their efforts were monitored — and supported — by a wide array of government intelligence agencies as well as top commanders at the Pentagon.




They were even consulted before the super-secret U.S. military raid that attempted to free the hostages in April 1980, which ended in disaster when a plane and a helicopter collided at a desert staging area.”



Apparently, the CIA was not dissuaded of its fascination with extrasensory mind abilities after Project Mk Ultra – which engaged in illegal human experimentation – was allegedly shut down in 1973.



READ MORE:  Taking a Picture in a National Forest Could Get You a $1,000 Fine, Unless You Buy a $1,500 License



The psychic program was initiated in 1975 as a “foreign assessment” when the CIA heard rumors that China and Russia were experimenting with psychics. The program continued for 20 years under 10 different code names — ‘Grill Flame’ ws one of them.


psychics


It continued despite that fact the psychics had, at best, a questionable rate of success when officials were able to compare psychic reports with information from the freed hostages in 1981. According to an Air Force colonel, only seven of the 202 psychic reports were proven correct, while 59 reports were partly or possibly correct.



The degree to which this was ‘dumb luck’ is unknown, but Army officers contested the pessimistic view. They said 45 percent of the reports were partially accurate, and “that was information that could not be obtained through normal intelligence collection channels. The degree of success appears to at least equal, if not surpass, other collection methods.”



“The debate continues today. “The stuff that the CIA has declassified is garbage,” one of the Grill Flame psychics, Joseph McMoneagle, told the Miami Herald. “They haven’t declassified any of the stuff that worked.” Agreed Edwin May, a physicist who oversaw parapsychology research for government intelligence agencies for 20 years: “The psychics were able to tell, in some cases, where the hostages were moved to. They were able to see the degree of their health. … If you can sit in Fort Meade and describe the health of hostages who are going to be released, so that the right doctors can be on hand, that’s very helpful.”



Others are more skeptical, to put it mildly. “The intelligence agencies might as well get a crystal ball out and stare into space and hope they see something,” said James Randi, a former professional magician who turned his career into debunking ESP and psychics. “It’s a huge waste of time and money and it doesn’t help the hostages one bit.”



Directors of the psychic program scoured outside and inside the ranks of military intelligence officers to find people with a talent for “remote viewing,” or “the mental ability to see across vast distances and through walls and other obstructions.”






READ MORE:  Protecting and Serving: Texas Man Thrown in Jail for Weeks because his Lawn was Overgrown



An early success of the psychic program, prior to the 1979 hostage crisis, was being able to locate a downed plane in the Central African Republic to within 15 miles. The CIA recruited a self-proclaimed psychic from California who went into a trance and wrote down latitudes and longitudes, allowing them to find the plane.


But during the hostage crisis, the ‘remote viewing’ of psychics was often completely wrong, as the Miami Herald further details. Nevertheless, the program continued until 1995, employing 227 psychics and carrying out 26,000 telepathic forays.


The program was shut down after an outside review found that “remote viewing reports failed to produce the concrete, specific information valued in intelligence reporting.”


Intelligence agencies certainly use a great deal of ‘remote sensing’ today, but this refers to satellites or high-flying aircraft scanning the earth in ever-more detailed and diverse ways. With what we know – and don’t know – about the technological capabilities of US spy agencies, psychic powers may not even measure up today.

Thursday, January 12, 2017

BREAKING: Trump Says Head of US Intel Admitted to Him Russia Report is ‘Made Up, Phony Facts’

BuzzFeed faced ridicule and biting criticism after publishing a flimsy and unsubstantiated dossier linking President-elect Donald Trump with the Russian government and cataloguing putatively lewd behavior — without any solid evidence or investigation of the startling accusations.


Now, it appears the decision may be even more foolhardy than it first seemed, as Trump wrote in his first tweet of the day:


“James Clapper called me yesterday to denounce the false and fictitious report that was illegally circulated. Made up, phony facts.Too bad!”




Director of National Intelligence James Clapper did, indeed, discuss the contentious report with the president-elect on Wednesday evening, and released a press statement, in essence, condemning mainstream media’s careless handling of unsubstantiated and sensitive information:



“This evening, I had the opportunity to speak with President-elect Donald Trump to discuss recent media reports about our briefing last Friday. I expressed my profound dismay at the leaks that have been appearing in the press, and we both agreed that they are extremely corrosive and damaging to our national security.


“We also discussed the private security company document, which was widely circulated in recent months among the media, members of Congress and Congressional staff even before the IC became aware of it. I emphasized that this document is not a U.S. Intelligence Community product and that I do not believe the leaks came from within the IC. The IC has not made any judgment that the information in this document is reliable, and we did not rely upon it in any way for our conclusions. However, part of our obligation is to ensure that policymakers are provided with the fullest possible picture of any matters that might affect national security.”



Although Clapper’s statement doesn’t exactly denounce the dossier as “phony facts,” his criticism and the fact intelligence officials have not deemed it “reliable” erode even further BuzzFeed’s feckless and inexplicable choice to run the report.


CNN first alluded to the allegations contained in the dossier, but did not provide the actual pages — but BuzzFeed somehow took that as a cue to print the dossier in full, despite editor-in-chief Ben Smith publicly doubting whether the ruinous information was factual.


Mainstream media outlets rushed to ride the viral wave of controversy sparked by BuzzFeed’s report, though none of the rest provided the actual document. According to the corporate media, this dossier — an unofficial, 35-page compilation of alleged tawdry acts and suggestions Trump maintained communication with Russian government throughout the election — had been produced by a former British intelligence officer and thus must be at least somewhat legitimate.


However, the audacious and abrupt rush to publish the document without a thorough investigation to vet the contents quickly unraveled as the corporate press — who had essentially done as much damage as BuzzFeed by reporting the story without providing the document for the public to evaluate — began lobbing Fake News accusations at each other.


As this study in irony and pitfalls of irresponsible journalism unfolded, Trump held a press conference, his first of the year, to attempt damage control, calling mainstream media’s reporting of “false” and “fake” information “a disgrace.”


That press conference furthered the unseemliness of the day’s events, and was most aptly described by Zero Hedge as “an epic (mutual) trolling between president-elect Trump on one hand and BuzzFeed and CNN, on the other.”


Understandably riled by the brash departure by the press from journalism to articles befitting a tabloid, Trump taunted,



“Buzzfeed, which is a failing pile of garbage … will suffer the consequences, and they already are.”


CNN reporter Jim Acosta, however, bore the brunt of the president-elect’s rage over the salacious allegations, after he repeatedly failed to get Trump’s attention and finally blurted out,


“Since you are attacking us, can you give us a question?”


“Not you,” Trump replied. “Your organization is terrible!”


Unsatisfied, Acosta pressed further, “You are attacking our news organization, can you give us a chance to ask a question, sir?”


“Don’t be rude,” Trump retorted. “I’m not going to give you a question.”


Acosta continued loudly pressing to be granted a question, but Trump sharply rebuked,


“Don’t be rude. No, I’m not going to give you a question. You are fake news!”


Without the backing of the U.S. Intelligence Community or the findings of its own investigations of the allegations concerning the incoming president, CNN and BuzzFeed — and the New York Times, Washington Post and others who followed suit — did, indeed, publish the exact Fake News all those same outlets have been condemning for months.


Now, the head of U.S. Intelligence has essentially said the same. However you characterize the ill-considered choice to print baseless accusations, it’s now clear the corporate media can no longer be considered a reliable source.